Structural organization and chromosomal localization of the human hepatocyte growth factor activator gene--phylogenetic and functional relationship with blood coagulation factor XII, urokinase, and tissue-type plasminogen activator

BACKGROUND: This study determined the dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia and described the onset, duration, and quality of analgesia when used as the sole analgesic. METHODS: Eighty-four parturients in active labor who requested analgesia were randomized to one of seven treatment groups. They received 5-45 microg intrathecal fentanyl as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique. Visual analog pain scores were recorded before and at intervals after injection patients requested additional analgesia. The occurrence and severity of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were also recorded. Maternal blood pressure was recorded before injection and at intervals after injection. Fetal heart rate was recorded before and 30 min after injection. RESULTS: By 5 min after injection, pain scores were significantly different among groups (P < 0.001). Mean duration of analgesia increased to 89 min as the dose increased to 25 microg. Maternal diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower 10 and 30 min after injection. There was no difference among groups in the incidence of pruritus; nausea and vomiting were uncommon. Fetal heart rates did not change after injection. A dose-response curve indicates that the median effective dose of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia is 14 microg (95% confidence interval, 13-15 microg). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal fentanyl produces rapid, profound labor analgesia with minimal side effects. These data indicate that there is little benefit to increasing the dose beyond 25 microg when it is used as the sole agent for intrathecal labor analgesia.     

Determination of provitamin A of green leafy vegetables by high performance liquid chromatography and open column chromatography

AIM OF STUDY: Intrathecal sufentanil has recently been used in labour as part of a combined spinal epidural technique. This study was conducted to compare its use in combination with bupivacaine for caesarean section with fentanyl added to bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone. METHODS: Sixty ASA I and II patients for non-emergency caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were divided into three groups to receive 15 micrograms fentanyl added to 7.5 mg bupivacaine, 10 micrograms sufentanil added to 7.5 mg bupivacaine and 7.5 mg bupivacaine. Onset time of sensory blockade, side effects, surgical conditions, neonatal outcome and quality of the anaesthetic was assessed. On the first postoperative day, duration of effective analgesia, side effects and patient satisfaction were noted. RESULTS: The duration of effective analgesia of bupivacaine alone was prolonged with the addition of sufentanil and fentanyl by 358% and 256% respectively. No patient in the sufentanil and fentanyl groups required additional intra-operative analgesics compared with 17.6% of patients in the bupivacaine alone group. There was an increase in incidence of desaturation in the sufentanil group (45%) and fentanyl group (5.6%) compared with the bupivacaine only group (0%). The incidence of pruritus was 35% with sufentanil, 27.8% with fentanyl against 0% with bupivacaine alone. CONCLUSION: The addition of 10 micrograms of sufentanil and 15 micrograms of fentanyl to 7.5 mg of bupivacaine prolonged the duration of effective analgesia and improved intra-operative analgesia. However, the incidence of pruritus and episodes of desaturation were increased more with 10 micrograms sufentanil than with 15 micrograms fentanyl.     

Adrenalectomy for a solitary adrenal metastasis from lung cancer

Intrathecal sufentanil provides approximately 2 h of excellent labor analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Epidural sufentanil has received less scrutiny but may provide the same benefits as intrathecal sufentanil. In this study, we compared epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine with an epinephrine test dose with intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil 10 microg with respect to onset and duration of analgesia, degree of motor block, side effect profile, and mode of delivery. Seventy ASA physical status I or II parturients in early labor (< or = 4 cm cervical dilation) were randomized to receive either i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) or epidural sufentanil 40 microg (e.p.) after epidural catheter placement and testing with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine (15 microg). After the administration of analgesia, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. The study period was completed when the patients requested additional analgesia. All patients, except one, achieved adequate analgesia with the initial study dose and satisfactorily completed the study. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Pain relief was rapid for all patients; pain scores were significantly lower at 5 and 10 min in the i.t. group versus the e.p. group. The mean duration of analgesia was similar between the e.p. group (127 +/- 40 min) and the i.t. group (110 +/- 48 min). No patient experienced any motor block. Side effects were similar between the two groups, except for pruritus-both the incidence and severity were significantly more profound at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in the i.t. group. There was no difference in time from analgesic to delivery, incidence of operative or assisted delivery, or cervical dilation at the time of redose. For early laboring patients, epidural sufentanil 40 microg after a lidocaine test dose provides analgesia comparable to that of i.t. sufentanil 10 microg with less pruritus. Implications: We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural sufentanil with a local anesthetic test dose for analgesia during labor. Analgesia was equally good, although the intrathecal group experienced more itching.     

Intrathecal sufentanil compared with epidural bupivacaine analgesia in labour

Epidural analgesia for pain relief during labour has certain disadvantages including slow onset. However, intrathecal sufentanil provides rapid onset and well-controlled analgesia lasting 1-4 h. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesia and the side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural bupivacaine during labour. In a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial 58 parturient women requesting analgesia during labour were studied. The patients received either intrathecal sufentanil 10 micrograms and epidural saline, or intrathecal saline and epidural bupivacaine 20 mg. Visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, level of sedation and the incidence of pruritus and nausea were recorded. Pain scores were significantly lower between 5 and 90 min after injection in patients receiving intrathecal sufentanil. Pruritus was significantly more frequent among those receiving intrathecal sufentanil. The rapid onset and effective analgesia of intrathecal sufentanil may in certain situations be advantageous.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with sufentanil-midazolam for major abdominal surgery

Haemodynamic and endocrine stress responses were compared during total intravenous anaesthesia with sufentanil and midazolam or fentanyl and midazolam in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Twenty-two ASA I and II patients were allocated randomly to receive sufentanil (induction 1.5 micrograms kg-1 plus infusion 1.5 micrograms kg-1 h-1) or fentanyl (induction 10 micrograms kg-1 plus infusion 10 micrograms kg-1 h-1) supplemented with 0.15 microgram kg-1 sufentanil or 1 microgram kg-1 fentanyl as necessary. Midazolam was infused to obtain plasma concentrations of 500-600 ng ml-1. Ventilation was with oxygen-enriched air. The opioid infusion was reduced post-operatively by half and benzodiazepine effects were reversed by titration with flumazenil. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and cardiac index decreased in both groups after induction (cardiac index: sufentanil 4.94 +/- 0.45 to 2.99 +/- 0.18 litre min-1; fentanyl 4.97 +/- 0.45 to 3.71 +/- 0.36 litre min-1), but all returned to baseline during surgery. With sufentanil; mean arterial pressure was lower throughout the study period, and heart rate was lower intra-operatively. Oxygen uptake decreased in both groups after induction (sufentanil 289 +/- 29 to 184 +/- 21 ml min-1; fentanyl 318 +/- 32 to 216 +/- 32 ml min-1) and remained low with sufentanil until flumazenil was given. Adrenaline concentrations increased in both groups but there was no intergroup difference. The median noradrenaline concentration was lower intra-operatively with sufentanil (0.47 nmol litre-1 (range 0.06-6.77)) than with fentanyl (0.73 nmol litre-1 (0.07-4.58)). Cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations increased in both groups. Bradycardia occurred in four patients with sufentanil and in three with fentanyl. There were two cases of marked thoracic rigidity with sufentanil and one with fentanyl.     

Labour analgesia with intrathecal fentanyl decreases maternal stress

PURPOSE: Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) decreases maternal stress as measured by maternal circulating plasma catecholamine concentrations. Intrathecal fentanyl (ITF) provides effective labour analgesia but its effect on maternal epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations is not known. This study assesses whether ITF reduces maternal stress in the same manner as conventional LEA. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy women in active labour received either 25 micrograms ITF (n = 12) or epidural lidocaine 1.5% (n = 12) for analgesia. Venous blood samples were collected before anaesthesia and at five minute intervals for 30 min following anaesthesia for the measurement of plasma Epi and NE by high performance liquid chromatography. Maternal blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), visual analog scores (VAS) to pain and pruritus were recorded at the same time. RESULTS: Both ITF and LEA decreased pain VAS scores, maternal BP, and plasma Epi concentrations with only minimal effects on plasma NE concentrations. Intrathecal fentanyl (ITF) and LEA reduced plasma epi to a similar extent, with ITF reducing the levels slightly faster than LEA. Intrathecal fentanyl(ITF) and LEA reduced plasma Epi concentrations by 52% and 51%, respectively (P value < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that ITF is as effective as LEA in producing pain relief in the labouring patient. Intrathecal Fentanyl (ITF) is also capable of reducing maternal plasma epinephrine concentration, thus avoiding the possibly deleterious side effects of excess amounts of this catecholamine during labour.     

Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction

BACKGROUND: When given as an intravenous bolus for induction of anesthesia, propofol can decrease postintubation hypertension but can also create moderate to severe postinduction, preintubation hypotension. The addition of fentanyl usually decreases the postintubation hypertension but can increase the propofol-induced preintubation hypotension. The goal of the study was to determine the relation between propofol and fentanyl doses and the hemodynamic changes post-induction, preintubation and postintubation. METHODS: Twelve groups of 10 patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, first received fentanyl 0, 2, or 4 micrograms.kg-1 and then 5 min later received propofol 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 mg.kg-1 as an intravenous bolus for induction of anesthesia. Arterial blood pressure was continuously monitored. The trachea was intubated 4 min after propofol administration. RESULTS: The mean decrease in systolic blood pressure after propofol was 28 mmHg when no fentanyl was given, 53 mmHg after 2 microgram.kg-1 of fentanyl (P < 0.05 vs. no fentanyl), and 50 mmHg after 4 micrograms.kg-1 (P < 0.05 vs. no fentanyl; no statistically significant difference 4 vs. 2 micrograms.kg-1). There was no statistically significant difference in hemodynamic response to intubation relative to propofol dose. Hemodynamic response to intubation was decreased by the administration of fentanyl; the mean increase of systolic blood pressure after intubation was 65 mmHg from preintubation value without fentanyl, 50 mmHg after 2 micrograms.kg-1, and 37 mmHg after 4 micrograms.kg-1 (P < 0.05 for 2 and 4 micrograms.kg-1 vs. no fentanyl and for 4 vs. 2 micrograms.kg-1). Hemodynamic changes postintubation were not statistically different with increasing doses of propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic changes after induction with propofol or propofol/fentanyl, pre- or postintubation, are not modified when the propofol dose is increased from 2 to 3.5 mg.kg-1. Maximal hypotension preintubation occurs with a fentanyl dose of 2 micrograms.kg-1, whereas the magnitude of postintubation hypertension is significantly decreased with an increase in the fentanyl dose to 4 micrograms.kg-1.     

Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate

BACKGROUND: A naloxone infusion is effective in reducing epidural and intrathecal opioid-related side effects. The use of naloxone infusion concomitant with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has not been evaluated, probably because of an expected direct antagonism of the systemic opioid effect. The authors compared the incidence of morphine-related side effects and the quality of analgesia from two small doses of naloxone infusion. METHODS: Sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, 2, or 3 who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomies were enrolled in the study. Patients received a standardized general anesthetic. In the postanesthetic care unit, patients received morphine as a PCA. They were randomized to receive either 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) naloxone (low dose), 1 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) (high dose), or saline (placebo) as a continuous infusion. Verbal rating scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus; sedation scores; requests for antiemetic; and morphine use were recorded for 24 h. Blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation were also monitored. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. Both naloxone doses were equally effective in reducing the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared with placebo (P < 0.05 by the chi-squared test). There was no difference in the verbal rating scores for pain between the groups. The cumulative morphine use was the lowest in the low-dose group (42.3 +/- 24.1 mg; means +/- SD) compared with the placebo (59.1 +/- 27.4 mg) and high-dose groups (64.7 +/- 33.0 mg) at 24 h (P < 0.05 by analysis of variance). There was no incidence of respiratory depression (<8 breaths/min) and no difference in sedation scores, antiemetic use, respiratory rate, and hemodynamic parameters among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone is effective in preventing PCA opioid-related side effects. Naloxone infusion at 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) not only attenuates these side effects but appears to reduce postoperative (beyond 4-8 h) opioid requirements. This dosing regimen can be prepared with 400 microg naloxone in 1,000 ml crystalloid given in 24 h to a patient weighing 70 kg.     

Effects of sufentanil on cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial pressure in patients with brain injury

BACKGROUND: The current study investigates the effects of sufentanil on cerebral blood flow velocity and intracranial pressure (ICP) in 30 patients with intracranial hypertension after severe brain trauma (Glasgow coma scale < 6). METHODS: Mechanical ventilation (FIO2 0.25-0.4) was adjusted to maintain arterial carbon dioxide tensions of 28-30 mmHg. Continuous infusion of midazolam (200 micrograms/kg/h intravenous) and fentanyl (2 micrograms/kg/h intravenous) was used for sedation. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, mmHg) was adjusted using norepinephrine infusion (1-5 micrograms/min). Mean blood flow velocity (Vmean, cm/s) was measured in the middle cerebral artery using a 2-MHz transcranial Doppler sonography system. ICP (mmHg) was measured using an epidural probe. After baseline measurements, a bolus of 3 micrograms/kg sufentanil was injected, and all parameters were continuously recorded for 30 min. The patients were assigned retrospectively to the following groups according to their blood pressure responses to sufentanil: group 1, MAP decrease of less than 10 mmHg, and group 2, MAP decrease of more than 10 mmHg. RESULTS: Heart rate, arterial blood gases, and esophageal temperature did not change over time in all patients. In 18 patients, MAP did not decrease after sufentanil (group 1). In 12 patients, sufentanil decreased MAP > 10 mmHg from baseline despite norepinephrine infusion (group 2). ICP was constant in patients with maintained MAP (group 1) but was significantly increased in patients with decreased MAP. Vmean did not change with sufentanil injection regardless of changes in MAP. CONCLUSIONS: The current data show that sufentanil (3 micrograms/kg intravenous) has no significant effect on middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and ICP in patients with brain injury, intracranial hypertension, and controlled MAP. However, transient increases in ICP without changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity may occur concomitant with decreases in MAP. This suggests that increases in ICP seen with sufentanil may be due to autoregulatory decreases in cerebral vascular resistance secondary to systemic hypotension.     

Respiratory arrest following intrathecal injection of sufentanil and bupivacaine in a parturient

PURPOSE: To present a case of respiratory arrest following the use of intrathecal sufentanil and bupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in a healthy labouring parturient. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 20-yr-old term parturient received 10 micrograms sufentanil and 2.5 mg bupivacaine intrathecally as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique for labour analgesia. She had received no previous analgesics. Twenty-three minutes after the intrathecal injection she became unresponsive and suffered a respiratory arrest. Resuscitation included manual bag/mask ventilation with oxygen and intravenous naloxone. CONCLUSION: Respiratory arrest is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication associated with the use of intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia. Vigilance in post-procedure patient monitoring is imperative.     

First record of trypanosomes in Tasmanian bandicoots

Postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is effectively obtained with morphine 0.1-0.3 mg intrathecally, although there may be dose-dependent side effects. We evaluated the quality of analgesia and the incidence of side effects with smaller doses of intrathecal morphine combined with intramuscular (i.m.) diclofenac. One hundred-twenty pregnant patients were allocated into six groups, which received the following treatments: Groups 1, 3, and 5 received 0.1, 0.05, and 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine, respectively, plus 75 mg of i.m. diclofenac every 8 h; Groups 2, 4, and 6 received 0.1, 0.05, and 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine, respectively, plus i.m. diclofenac on demand. Spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pain scores and side effects were evaluated hourly for the first 24 h. Groups 1 and 2 had lower pain scores than Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6. However, only patients in Groups 2, 4, and 6 requested additional analgesics. Severe pruritus was more frequent in Groups 1 and 2. No patient experienced respiratory depression. We conclude that there is no advantage in using doses larger than 0.025 mg of intrathecal morphine if they are combined with systemic diclofenac. IMPLICATIONS: A multimodal approach to pain control may provide good quality analgesia while reducing drug-related side effects. In this study, a very small dose of intrathecal morphine, in association with intramuscular diclofenac, proved effective for controlling pain after cesarean delivery, with a low incidence of morphine-induced pruritus.     

Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr. RESULTS: No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.     

Dose-response relationship of clonidine with epidural administration of ropivacaine in orthopedic procedures of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preliminarydose-range effects of clonidine added to ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs with doses, causing a minimum of cardiovascular side effects. METHODS: 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive in a double-blind fashion a mixture of 1 mg/cm height ropivacaine plus saline or 1 mg/cm ropivacaine plus 25 micrograms, 50 micrograms, 75 micrograms, 100 micrograms or 150 micrograms clonidine for epidural analgesia. The sensory and motor function were determined at defined time intervals for 30 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were controlled and sedation score was judged. The postoperative 2-segment-regression of pin-prick and the onset of pain were recorded. RESULTS: The six groups were comparable in demographic data and in term of onset time. The prolongation of analgesia reached 513 +/- 92 min (p = 0.002) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 460 +/- 148 min (p = 0.073) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 440 +/- 86 min (p = 0.057) for 75 micrograms clonidine compared with 347 +/- 114 min for saline. In an equal manner, 2-segment-regression for pin-prick was extended to 251 +/- 47 min (p = 0.018) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 238 +/- 33 min (p = 0.034) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 229 +/- 29 min (p = 0.027) for 75 micrograms clonidine and 178 +/- 43 min for saline. Heart rate dropped down in all groups. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in the groups with 75, 100 and 150 micrograms clonidine. Sedation score increased continuously from 0.6 +/- 0.5 (saline) to 1.8 +/- 0.8 (150 micrograms clonidine). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 150 micrograms clonidine significantly enhances the duration of analgesia of epidurally administered ropivacaine in a mean of 171 mg. This time interval is longer than the one with 200 mg ropivacaine alone. But, there are side effects in form of decrease of arterial pressure. Cardiovascular monitoring seems to be essential. Because of the enhanced analgesia duration, the time interval for reloading epidural anaesthesia are increased.     

Effectiveness, side effects and costs of postoperative pain therapy: intravenous and epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

PURPOSE: Improvement of the quality of analgesia, reduction of side effects and costs by application of epidural (PCEA) in comparison to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in postoperative pain treatment. METHODS: 62 patients with upper abdominal surgery took part in this randomised prospective study which was approved by the local ethics committee. Epidural catheters were inserted at T 8/9 (group PCEA). General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, sufentanil 2 micrograms/kg, pancuronium, enflurane and O2:N2O = 1:2. Postoperative analgesia consisted of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% + sufentanil 2 micrograms/ml (BS). (bolus 0.05 ml/kg, lockout 10 min) in group PCEA, or of intravenous morphine (bolus 2 mg. lockout 10 min) in group PCA. The following parameters were recorded until the evening of postoperative day 4: pain intensity at rest (VASR, 1-10) and on coughing (VASH, 1-10), blood pressure, heart rate, blood gas analysis, ability to ambulate, pruritus, nausea/vomiting (PONV), patient satisfaction (0-4), time and expenses for postoperative pain treatment. RESULTS: Median VASR (1 vs 2) and VASH (3 vs 4.5) were lower, cough intensity (2 vs 1) and patient satisfaction score (4 vs 3) were higher in PCEA compared to PCA. Ability to ambulate, pruritus, PONV, haemodynamics, paO2 and paCO2 were comparable. Postoperative pain treatment with PCEA was more time-consuming (407 vs 299 min) and expensive (71 vs 40 S/day) than PCA. CONCLUSION: PCEA in comparison to PCA after major abdominal surgery provides superior analgesia with comparable side effects at approximately 80% higher costs.     

Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia--sensory changes, side effects, and fetal heart rate changes

This study was designed to evaluate intrathecal (IT) sufentanil for labor analgesia with respect to sensory changes, side effects, and fetal heart rate (FHR) changes. In Phase I of the study, data regarding duration of analgesia and hemodynamic changes were obtained retrospectively from the labor and anesthetic records of 90 patients who had received IT sufentanil, 10 micrograms in 1 mL of saline, during active labor. In Phase II, an additional 18 parturients who received similar treatment were studied prospectively to document sensory, motor, and hemodynamic changes, as well as the incidence of side effects. In Phase I, analgesia occurred rapidly and lasted 124 +/- 68 min (SD); 19% of patients required no further analgesia before delivery. In Phase II, median time to onset of analgesia was 3 min (range 1-6 min) and mean duration of analgesia was 96 +/- 36 min. Decreased sensation to pinprick and cold occurred within 6 min extending from T4 to L4 (upper and lower median levels) in the majority of patients. All subjects requested additional analgesia within approximately 30 min of recession of sensory changes. Motor strength remained normal throughout. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure [BP] < or = 90 mm Hg or > 20% decrease in systolic BP) occurred in 14% and 11% of patients in Phase I and II, respectively. Perineal itching preceded analgesia in 95% of patients and all subjects experienced mild sedation. FHR changes occurred in 15% of cases but were not associated with adverse neonatal outcome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Osmotic concentration of polypeptides from hemofiltrate of uremic patients

In order to clarify the interactions between various doses of thiopental and fentanyl in producing "balanced anaesthesia", their effects on consciousness, superficial nociception, and respiration and circulation were studied during N2O+O2 inhalation in connection with the induction of anaesthesia. Altogether 60 patients were studied; the drug combinations used were thiopental 5 mg/kg (TP5), thipental 3 mg/kg (TP3), thiopental 3 mg/kg and fentanyl 0.5 micrograms/kg (TP3F0.5), thiopental 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 micrograms/kg (TP2F1), thiopental 1 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg (TP1F2), and fentanyl 3 micrograms/kg (F3). Five minutes after the i.v. supplementation of N2O+O2 anaesthesia, the depth of anaesthesia and analgesia (antinociception) were evaluated from the eyelid reflex and by pinching an inguinal skin fold. Cardiorespiratory parameters were measured during this study period at 1-min intervals. The balance between antinociception and anaesthesia was closest to optimum in groups TP2F1 and TP2F0.5. In pure thiopental groups, the analgesia was poor; only four patients did not respond to the nociceptive stimulus, whereas in group F3 anaesthesia (disappearance of the eyelid reflex) was obtained in only two patients. The respiratory depression was most pronounced in groups receiving 3, 2 and 1 micrograms/kg fentanyl and weakest in groups where only thiopental was used. Blood pressure decreased in all groups but no statistically significant differences were noted. On the basis of the results it seems obvious that attempts to achieve what is called "balanced anaesthesia" by the supplementation of an N2O+O2 mixture with fentanyl only leads to an unnecessarily prnounced respiratory depression, whereas supplementation with thiopental alone does not offer adequate antinociception.     

Comparison of perioperative ketoprofen 2.0 mg kg-1 with 0.5 mg kg-1 i.v. in small children during adenoidectomy

We have investigated if ketoprofen 0.5 mg kg-1 i.v. provided as good analgesia with less adverse effects compared with ketoprofen 2.0 mg kg-1 i.v. in 107 children, aged 1-7 yr, after adenoidectomy, in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study design. A standard anaesthetic method was used and all children received fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1 i.v. during induction. Children in group 2.0 received ketoprofen 2.0 mg kg-1 and children in group 0.5, 0.5 mg kg-1 i.v. during induction. If the child was in pain, fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1 was given i.v. as rescue analgesia. We found that ketoprofen provided good analgesia and only 49% of children required fentanyl in the post-anaesthesia care unit. There were no differences between the groups in the number of fentanyl doses, pain scores or frequency of adverse reactions. No serious adverse reactions occurred.     

A case of acquired petrous cholesteatoma associated with insidious middle ear infection treated by staging the surgical procedures

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of preincision wound infiltration with bupivacaine to wound infiltration at the end of the operation. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 56 ASA status I and II women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 (control) received no local anesthetic infiltration. Group 2 received subcutaneous infiltration with 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% (pH 6.9) 15 minutes prior to incision. Group 3 received wound infiltration with a similar solution at the end of surgery. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 3.0 mg/kg i.v., droperidol 50 micrograms/kg i.v., and sufentanil 0.5 microgram/kg i.v. and maintained with nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen and sufentanil 0.1 microgram/kg IV boluses as required. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia delivery system for 24 hours, followed by oral hydrocodone for 3 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The opioid consumption was recorded for 4 days postoperatively. Pain scores were measured at 4 to 8-hour intervals using 100 mm visual analog scales. There was no difference in either the opioid analgesic requirements or the pain scores between the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wound infiltration, either preincision or postincision, had no clinically significant effect on the pain scores or analgesic requirements following abdominal hysterectomy.     

Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia

BACKGROUND: This series investigated the quality of analgesia and the incidence and severity of side effects of intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia administered over a dose range of 0.0-0.5 mg. METHODS: ONE hundred eight term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at term and given spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive a single dose of intrathecal morphine (0.0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use, incidence and severity of side effects, and need for treatment interventions were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and linear regression analysis for trends among groups. RESULTS: Patient-controlled analgesia use differed significantly between groups; PCA use was higher in the control group than in groups receiving 0.075, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg. Twenty-four-hour PCA morphine use was 45.7 mg lower (95% CI, 4.8-86.6 mg lower) in the 0.075-mg group than the control group. There was no difference in PCA morphine use between the 0.075- and 0.5-mg groups (95% CI, 36.8 mg lower to 45.0 mg higher); despite a fivefold increase in intrathecal morphine dose, PCA morphine use remained constant. There was no difference between control and treatment groups or among treatment groups with respect to nausea and vomiting. Pruritus and the need for treatment interventions increased in direct proportion to the dose of intrathecal morphine (linear regression, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate there is little justification for use of more than 0.1 mg for post-cesarean analgesia. For optimal analgesia, augmentation [corrected] of intrathecal morphine with systemic opioids may be necessary.     

Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient

The effectiveness of two epidural analgesic regimens on the ability to ambulate was compared in women in labor by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One group of patients received epidural fentanyl, a 75-micrograms bolus and an infusion of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/mL at 15 mL/h (FENT, n = 53). A second group received ultra low-dose bupivacaine (0.04%), epinephrine (1.7 micrograms/mL), and fentanyl (1.7 micrograms/mL) (BEF, n = 77), a 15-mL bolus followed by an infusion at 15 mL/h. Adequate analgesia was rapidly obtained in 90.6% of patients in the FENT group and 92.2% of patients in the BEF group (P = 0.89). Seventy percent of patients in the FENT group ambulated versus 68% in the other group. The BEF mixture provided analgesia of longer duration (287 +/- 171 min versus 156 +/- 72 min, P = 0.0001). The number of patients delivering during administration of only their study drug (without needing higher doses of local anesthetics) was 52% for BEF and 21% for FENT (P = 0.0005). Hip flexion weakness precluding ambulation occurred in 17% (P = 0.002) of BEF patients and orthostatic hypotension in 9% (P = 0.08). Neither problem occurred in FENT patients. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Approximately 70% of women receiving epidural analgesia with fentanyl or ultra low-dose bupivacaine, epinephrine, and fentanyl may ambulate safely during labor.