Anxiolytic effects of dopamine receptor ligands: I. Involvement of dopamine autoreceptors

The anxiolytic-like properties of dopamine agonists and antagonists with different receptor profiles were investigated in the ultrasonic vocalization test in rats after subcutaneous administration. Only dopamine D2 receptor agonists inhibited ultrasonic vocalization with the following ED50 values: apomorphine (0.07 mg/kg), quinelorane (0.01 mg/kg), quinpirole (0.04 mg/kg), pramipexole (0.09 mg/kg), roxindole (0.04 mg/kg), talipexole (0.04 mg/kg), (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg/kg), (+/-)-PPHT (0.03 mg/kg), (-)-TNPA (0.06 mg/kg), PD128907 (0.13 mg/kg). The D2 antagonists haloperidol, mazapertine, raclopride, remoxipride, L745870, U99194A, U101958 and S(-)-DS121, the partial agonists PD143188 and preclamol, the selective D1 agonist R(+)-SKF38393 and the D1 antagonist SCH23390, and the uptake inhibitors GBR12909, GBR12935 and indatraline lacked significant inhibitory effects on ultrasonic vocalization. Because at least some of the D2 receptor agonists investigated have selectivity for dopamine autoreceptors, it is speculated that the dopamine autoreceptor may be a target for the development of new antianxiety drugs.     

Motor effects of lamotrigine in naive and dopamine-depleted mice

Lamotrigine (3,5-diamino-6-[2,3-dichlorphenyl]-1,2,4-triazine) has been hypothesised to possess antiparkinsonian activity, by inhibiting the release of glutamate from basal ganglia neurones. This study therefore examined the motor effects of lamotrigine in naive and reserpine-treated mice and its interactions with dopaminergic agonists. In normal mice, lamotrigine (5-80 mg/kg i.p.) decreased spontaneous locomotor activity with high doses (> or = 40 mg/kg) causing moderately severe impairment to posture and gait. In mice treated 24 h beforehand with reserpine (5 mg/kg i.p.), lamotrigine (5-40 mg/kg i.p.) had no effect on akinesia by itself and did not alter the locomotion induced with the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist 2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1 H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SKF 38393, 30 mg/kg i.p.). By contrast, motor responses to the dopamine D2 receptor-selective agonist N-n-propyl-N-phenylethyl-p-(3-hydroxyphenyl)ethylamine (RU 24213, 5 mg/kg s.c.) and to the dopamine precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA, 150 mg/kg i.p. in the presence of benserazide, 100 mg/kg i.p.), were significantly potentiated by 10 and 40 mg/kg i.p. lamotrigine respectively. It is suggested that lamotrigine may enhance the antiakinetic action of L-DOPA in parkinson-like mice by increasing motor responding mediated by dopamine D2 but not dopamine D1 receptors. This interaction profile of lamotrigine with dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mechanisms is opposite to what one sees with antagonists of glutamate receptors.     

Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on cocaine-induced place preference conditioning in preweanling rats

The effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on the reward processes of 10- and 17-day-old rats were assessed using the conditioned place preference paradigm. Conditioning and testing were conducted in a three-compartment chamber, with each end compartment having its own distinct tactile and odor cues (almond and lemon). During six experiments, 10- and 17-day-old rats (age at initial conditioning) were injected intraperitoneally with either saline, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist R(+/-)-SCH 23390 hydrochloride (0.01-1.0 mg/kg), or the dopamine D2 receptor antagonists (+/-)-sulpiride (1-100 mg/kg) or S(-)-eticlopride hydrochloride (0.1-0.5 mg/kg) 30 min prior to being injected with cocaine hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) or saline. After the latter injections, rats were immediately confined in the lemon-scented (nonpreferred) compartment for 30 min. On the alternate conditioning day, rats were injected with saline and confined in the almond-scented compartment. On the third day (i.e., the test day), rats were given saline and allowed free access to the entire chamber for 15 min. The results showed that the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 blocked the cocaine-induced place preference conditioning of both 10- and 17-day-old rats. Surprisingly, the dopamine D2 receptor antagonists sulpiride and eticlopride blocked the place preference conditioning of 10-day-old rats, while leaving the 17-day-old rats unaffected. These results indicate that dopamine D1 receptors are critically involved in the reward processes of preweanling rats, but that the importance of dopamine D2 receptors changes across ontogeny.     

Biphasic locomotor effects of the dopamine D1 agonist SKF 38393 and their attenuation in non-habituated mice

The locomotor stimulatory effects of the dopamine D1 receptor partial agonist SKF 38393 were examined in male C57B1/6J mice. Non-habituated mice showed marked dose-related (3-300 mg/kg, SC) locomotor stimulation. The time-course effect was biphasic at very high doses (100-300 mg/kg), with dose-related locomotor depression followed by dose-related long-term hyperlocomotion. For all doses, locomotor effects were detectable throughout the 4-h test period. To determine whether these effects were mediated by D1 receptor stimulation, effects of SKF 38393 were assessed in combination with behaviorally inactive and active doses (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively) of the selective D1 receptor antagonist SCH 39166. Both doses of SCH 39166 attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by 30 mg/kg of the agonist to a similar degree. However, neither dose was able to reverse either the depressant or the stimulatory effects of 300 mg/kg SKF 38393. These results demonstrate effects of the prototypical D1 agonist previously unobserved, and raise questions concerning the nature of agonist/antagonist interactions at the D1 receptor subtype.     

L-745,870, a subtype selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, does not exhibit a neuroleptic-like profile in rodent behavioral tests

This study examined the high-affinity, selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, L-745,870 (3-([4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2, 3-b]pyridine) in rodent behavioral models used to predict antipsychotic potential and side-effect liabilities in humans. In contrast to the classical neuroleptic, haloperidol, and the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine, L-745,870 failed to antagonize amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice or impair conditioned avoidance responding in the rat at doses selectively blocking D4 receptors. Furthermore, L-745,870 failed to reverse the deficit in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle responding induced by the nonselective dopamine D2/3/4 receptor agonist apomorphine, an effect which was abolished in rats pretreated with the D2/3 receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.2 mg/kg s.c.). L-745,870 had no effect on apomorphine-induced stereotypy in the rat but did induce catalepsy in the mouse, albeit at a high dose of 100 mg/kg, which is likely to occupy dopamine D2 receptors in vivo. High doses also impaired motor performance; in rats L-745,870 significantly reduced spontaneous locomotor activity (minimum effective dose = 30 mg/kg) and in mice, L-745,870 reduced the time spent on a rotarod revolving at 15 rpm (minimum effective dose = 100 mg/kg). Altogether these results suggest that dopamine D4 receptor antagonism is not responsible for the ability of clozapine to attenuate amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and conditioned avoidance responding in rodents. Furthermore, the lack of effect of L-745,870 in these behavioral tests is consistent with the inability of the compound to alleviate psychotic symptoms in humans.     

Strain-dependent effects of dopamine agonists on acetylcholine release in the hippocampus: an in vivo study in mice

The effects of selective D1 or D2 dopamine receptor agonists and the indirect dopamine agonist cocaine on hippocampal acetylcholine release in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains were investigated using intracerebral microdialysis. The D1 SKF 38393 (10, 20, 30 mg/kg, i.p.), the D2 agonist LY 171555 (0.5, 1, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) and cocaine (5, 10, 15 mg/kg, i.p.) all increased, dose-dependently, acetylcholine release in the hippocampus of C57BL/6 mice. Both the D1 agonist and cocaine did not produce any significant effect in DBA/2 mice. In the latter strain, however, LY 171555 produced a decrease in acetylcholine release that was evident after 60 min from injection of the doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, but not at the dose of 2 mg/kg. The effects observed in C57BL/6 mice as well as those produced by low doses of LY 171555 in the DBA/2 strain were consistent with previous results obtained in rats. The present results indicate major strain-dependent differences in the effects of dopamine agonists on hippocampal acetylcholine release in mice. Moreover, they suggest a complex genotype-related neural organization of dopamine-acetylcholine interactions in the mesolimbic system. Finally, the strain differences in the effects of the dopamine agonists on hippocampal acetylcholine release parallel previously reported strain differences in the effects of these substances on memory consolidation.     

Behavioural sensitization of mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptors in chronic fluoxetine-treated rats

A common action of chronic antidepressant treatments is the potentiation of dopaminergic transmission in the limbic system. We now report that chronic, but not acute, treatment with fluoxetine (2.5 mg/kg by intragastric gavage once a day for 21 days) potentiates the locomotor stimulant effect of quinpirole, a selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist. However, neither quinpirole-induced stereotypies nor the sedative effects elicited by low doses of this dopamine receptor agonist are influenced by chronic fluoxetine. These results suggest that fluoxetine, as well as classical antidepressants, sensitize postsynaptic dopamine D2/D3 receptors in the mesolimbic system.     

Place conditioning with the dopamine D1-like receptor agonist SKF 82958 but not SKF 81297 or SKF 77434

While self-administration and place conditioning studies have shown that dopamine D2-like receptor agonists produce reward-related learning, the effects of dopamine D1-like receptor agonists remain equivocal. The present study tested three dopamine D1-like receptor agonists for their ability to induce a place preference. Like control rats treated with amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg i.p.), rats treated with SKF 82958 (+/- -6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-phenyl-1H- 3-benzazepine hydrobromide; 0.05 but not 0.01, 0.025, 0.075, or 0.10 mg/kg s.c. and/or i.p.) during conditioning showed a significant increase in the amount of time spent on the drug-paired side during the drug free test. Neither SKF 81297 (+/- -6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide; 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg i.p.) nor SKF 77434 (+/- -7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride; 0.20, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.) produced place conditioning. Significant increases in locomotion were seen at some doses of all drugs. Results show for the first time that systemic administration of a dopamine D1-like receptor agonist produces a place preference and are consistent with previous findings showing that dopamine D1-like receptor activation produces reward-related learning.     

Emergency coronary artery surgery after failed PTCA: myocardial protection with continuous coronary perfusion of beta-blocker-enriched blood

MK-801 (dizocilpine), a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, induces dystonia in monkeys at doses of 0.08 mg/kg. This syndrome was tested with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist NNC 756, the DA D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 81297, the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole, the anticholinergic biperiden, amphetamine, and the benzodiazepine midazolam in 7 Cebus apella monkeys previously treated with dopaminergic agents. NNC 756 (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), raclopride (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), SKF 81297 (0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg), quinpirole (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), and biperiden (0.125 and up to 1.0 mg/kg), had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. In contrast, both clozapine (2.0 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.4 and 1.0 mg/kg) reduced the dystonia caused by MK-801. Dystonia induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists is easily antagonized by biperiden and dopamine agonists, whereas these drugs had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. It has been proposed that dystonia may be caused by a sudden drop in the output from the basal ganglia that is primarily GABAergic. Midazolam's enhancing effect on the GABAergic tone is consistent with this hypothesis. The effect of clozapine is more difficult to explain, but this drug has a rich pharmacology and suggests an agonistic glutamatergic effect.     

Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the rat: lack of interaction with opioids

The present study examined the effects of several opioid agonists and antagonists in rats trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced, discrimination task. Neither fentanyl, a mu agonist, nor the delta agonist BW 373U86 elicited cocaine-appropriate responding. Although pretreatment with fentanyl failed to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of low doses of cocaine, cocaine reversed the rate-suppressant effects of fentanyl. Although the kappa agonist U50,488H decreased response rates, it did not substitute for cocaine. Injection of U50,488H in combination with the training dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg) reversed the rate-suppressant effects of U50,488H but failed to affect the cocaine cue. Administration of U50,488H (3 mg/kg), in conjunction with several doses of cocaine, did not shift the cocaine dose-response curve. Naltrindole and naltrexone, delta and mu antagonists respectively, did not block the effects of cocaine. Further, naltrindole did not substitute for the cocaine cue. Complete generalization was observed to the dopamine uptake inhibitor bupropion (30 mg/kg). These results suggest that fentanyl and U50,488H, at doses that purportedly influence mesolimbic dopamine levels, do not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Moreover, activation of delta receptors and blockade of mu and delta receptors are similarly ineffective.     

Differential influence of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors on acute opiate withdrawal in guinea-pig isolated ileum

1. The effects exerted by D1 and D2 dopamine agonists and antagonists on the acute opiate withdrawal induced by mu- and kappa-receptor agonists were investigated in vitro. 2. Following a 4 min in vitro exposure to morphine (moderately selective mu-agonist), [D-Ala2, Me-Phe4, Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO, highly selective mu-agonist) or U-50488H (highly selective kappa-agonist) the guinea-pig isolated ileum exhibited a strong contracture after the addition of naloxone. 3. The non-selective dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol when added before or after the opioid agonists, was able dose-dependently to prevent or to reverse the naloxone-induced contracture after exposure to mu- (morphine and DAMGO) and kappa- (U-50488H) opioid agonists. The non-selective dopamine receptor agonist, apomorphine, was able to exert the same effects only at the highest concentration used. 4. The selective D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, sulpiride, was also able to reduce dose-dependently both mu- and kappa-opioid withdrawal, whereas the D1-receptor selective antagonist SCH 23390 did not affect either mu- or kappa-opioid withdrawal. 5. Bromocriptine, a D2 selective dopamine receptor agonist was able to increase significantly, and in a concentration-dependent manner, the naloxone-induced contracture by mu- and kappa-opioid agonists, whereas SKF 38393, a D1 selective dopamine receptor agonist, increased only the withdrawal after morphine or U50-488H. 6. Our data indicate that both D1 and D2 dopamine agonists and antagonists are able to influence opiate withdrawal in vitro, suggesting an important functional interaction between the dopaminergic system and opioid withdrawal at both the mu- and kappa-receptor level. 7. Furthermore, the ability of sulpiride to block strongly opiate withdrawal when compared to SCH 23390, as well as the effect of bromocriptine to increase opiate withdrawal suggest that D2 dopamine receptors may be primarily involved in the control of opiate withdrawal.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in the rat: differential effects of selective and nonselective benzodiazepine receptor agonists

Rats were trained to discriminate between ethanol (1.0 g/kg; 10% v/v) and saline under a fixed ratio 10 schedule of sweetened milk reinforcement. Both diazepam [nonselective, full benzodiazepine (BZ) receptors agonist] and bretazenil (nonselective, partial BZ receptor agonist) produced dose-dependent ethanol-appropriate responding (>75%). Neither diazepam nor bretazenil affected the response rate at the doses producing maximal generalisation from ethanol. In contrast, zolpidem (full BZ1 receptor agonist) and abecarnil (full BZ1/full or partial BZ2 receptor agonist) produced only moderate (<50%) ethanol-appropriate responding when tested up to doses that markedly decreased the overall response rate. These results suggest that: 1) there are no major differences between full and partial, nonselective BZ receptor agonists in their ability to substitute for 1.0 g/kg dose of ethanol; 2) stimulation of BZ1 receptors alone is not sufficient to produce ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in the rat.     

Role of renal interstitial pressure on chronic control of arterial blood pressure

We examined the modulatory effect of serotonergic activities on haloperidol-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatum. Chronic treatment with haloperidol (0.1, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p., 3 weeks) increased the number of dopamine D2 receptors, while no increase was observed with atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine (10 mg/kg) and ORG 5222 (0.25 mg/kg). Chronic treatment with MK 212, a serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C receptor agonist (2.5 mg/kg), or with citalopram, a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (10 mg/kg), potentiated the haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg)-induced up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptor, while that with (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist (0.1 mg/kg), had no influence on the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Co-administration of ritanserin (1 mg/kg), a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, with a low dose of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), but not with a high dose of the agent (0.5 mg/kg), attenuated the dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation. Drug occupation of 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors in vivo examined with use of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) was 69.8% and 45.1%, respectively, after the acute administration of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) plus ritanserin (1 mg/kg). This profile that 5-HT2A receptors were highly occupied compared with dopamine D2 receptors was similar to that of clozapine or ORG 5222. These results suggest that potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonism versus weak dopamine D2 receptor blockade may be involved in the absence of up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors after chronic treatment with clozapine or ORG 5222.     

Motor response to a dopamine D3 receptor preferring agonist compared to apomorphine in levodopa-primed 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine monkeys

The profile of dopamine receptor subtype activation contributing to the therapeutic efficacy and motor response complications of levodopa (nonselective pro-agonist) in Parkinson's disease remains unclear. Potent, selective, short-acting dopamine D2 receptor subfamily agonists show good antiparkinsonian efficacy but produce dyskinesias comparable to levodopa. Nonetheless, agonists displaying higher affinity for dopamine receptors other than the D2 subtype may have a better therapeutic index. To clarify this issue, we compared the nonselective dopamine D1/D2 receptor subfamilies agonist apomorphine to the dopamine D3 receptor preferring agonist [R-(+)-trans-3,4,4a,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopyrano[4 , 3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol] (PD 128,907) in 6 levodopa-primed , 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned parkinsonian monkeys with reproducible dyskinesias. Single s.c. dosing with the lowest fully effective dose of apomorphine (averaging 27.9 +/- 4.5 microg/kg) and PD 128,907 (averaging 41.7 +/- 4.4 microg/kg) yielded equivalent antiparkinsonian efficacy on the behavioral scale and portable activity monitoring used. A comparable significant dose-dependent increase in the response magnitude and duration was seen with two higher doses. The severity of dyskinesia was also similar between the two drugs. When the lower dose for each drug was administered six times at a fixed 90-min interval, both drugs remained efficacious with no significant tolerance observed. The D3 receptor preferring antagonist U-99194A significantly reduced the motor effects of both apomorphine and PD 128,907. Thus, increased D3 receptor tone does not acutely ameliorate dyskinesias in levodopa-primed parkinsonian monkeys. Given the reported lack of affinity of PD 128,907 for central D1 receptors, our data support the concept that the pharmacological activation of D1 receptors is not mandatory for relief of parkinsonism and production of dyskinesia.     

Investigations into the nature of a 7-OH-DPAT discriminative cue: comparison with D-amphetamine

In the present study, separate squads of rats were trained to discriminate either the dopamine D3 receptor preferring ligand 7-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)-tetralin (7-OH-DPAT) (0.03 mg/kg) from saline, or D-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) from saline using a standard operant schedule (FR10 schedule reinforcement). Following stable acquisition of responding, tests of generalisation and antagonism were conducted. A number of dopamine agonists having high dopamine D2-like receptor (D2, D3 or D4) affinity generalised to the 7-OH-DPAT, but not amphetamine, cue. The dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist SKF38393 showed no generalisation to either drug cue. Subsequent correlational analysis suggested that this effect was most likely mediated through the dopamine D3 receptor. The dopamine D2/3 receptor antagonist raclopride significantly attenuated both cues. The failure of these drugs to generalise to amphetamine, suggest that there is little involvement of the dopamine D3 receptor subtype in mediating its discriminative stimulus properties.     

Motor stimulant effects of caffeine in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats are dependent on previous stimulation of dopamine receptors: a different role of D1 and D2 receptors

Caffeine has been reported to induce contralateral rotational behaviour in rats bearing a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway. In order to define the role of dopamine receptors in the mediation of this behaviour, we have evaluated the influence of previous exposure to a dopamine receptor agonist and the importance of the time elapsed from the 6-hydroxydopamine lesion on the rotational behaviour induced by caffeine. Separate groups of rats lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine 2 weeks previously were exposed to four administrations of the D1/D2 receptor agonist apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) (primed) or vehicle (drug-naive). Three days later, all rats received caffeine (30 mg/kg s.c.). Drug-naive 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats did not rotate in response to caffeine, while rats primed with apomorphine rotate contralaterally in response to caffeine. When apomorphine priming was paired to the same environment (hemispherical bowls) where rats received caffeine, rotational behaviour was significantly higher than that obtained in rats primed in an unpaired environment (cylinders). Repeated priming with the D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.2 mg/kg s.c.) induced a totally context-dependent contralateral rotation in response to caffeine, while caffeine contralateral rotation was not dependent from the context after repeated priming with the D1 agonist SKF 38393 [1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1 H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride, 3 mg/kg s.c.]. Caffeine-mediated contralateral rotation was also evaluated in rats lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine 12 weeks previously and exposed to four administrations of apomorphine or vehicle. As for rats repeatedly exposed to vehicle or apomorphine 2 weeks after 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning, caffeine failed to induce contralateral rotation in drug-naive rats, while it did induce a partially context-dependent contralateral rotation in apomorphine-primed rats. Different from rats receiving apomorphine priming 2 weeks after 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning, in 12 week-lesioned rats, caffeine also induced contralateral rotation after one priming with apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.), a condition which fails to induce context-dependent rotation. Administration of selective antagonists of A1 (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), (DPCPX) or A2A (5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-7-(3-phenylpropyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1 ,2,4-triazolo[5c]pirimidine), (SCH 58261) adenosine receptors failed to induce contralateral rotation either alone or in combination in 12 week-6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats repeatedly primed with apomorphine. All together, the results indicate that: (i) caffeine does not induce any contralateral rotation in drug-naive 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats; (ii) priming with a dopamine agonist enables caffeine to induce contralateral rotation, this rotation is, however, context independent only after priming with a selective D1 agonist; (iii) contralateral rotation in response to caffeine is dependent on the time from the 6-hydroxydopamine lesion; (iv) blockade of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors with selective antagonists does not induce contralateral rotational behaviour in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats.     

Opposing roles for dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the regulation of hypothalamic tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons

The purpose of the present study was to characterize pharmacologically dopamine D1 receptor-mediated inhibition of tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons in males rats, and to determine if inhibitory dopamine D1 receptors oppose stimulatory dopamine D2 receptors and account for the inability of mixed dopamine receptor agonists to alter the activity of these neurons. Tuberoinfundibular dopamine neuronal activity was estimated by measuring the concentrations of the dopamine metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) in the median eminence, the region of the hypothalamus containing terminals of these neurons. Administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist (+/-)-1 phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1 H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF38393) decreased median eminence DOPAC and increased plasma prolactin concentrations, whereas administration of the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist ((-)-trans,6,7,7a,8,9,13b-hexahydro-3-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-methyl-5H -benzo[d]naphtho-[2,1 b]azepine (SCH39166) increased median eminence DOPAC concentrations but had not effect on plasma prolactin. The inhibitory effect of SKF38393 on median eminence DOPAC concentrations was blocked by SCH39166. These results demonstrate that acute activation of dopamine D1 receptors inhibits the activity of tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons and thereby increases prolactin secretion, and that under basal conditions dopamine D1 receptor-mediated inhibition of tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons is tonically active. Administration of the dopamine D2 receptor agonist (5aR-trans)-5,5a,6,7,8,9,9a,10-octahydro-6-propyl-pyridol[2, 3-g]quinazolin-2-amine (quinelorane) increased median eminence DOPAC concentrations, and SKF38393 caused a dose-dependent reversal of this effect. Administration of the mixed dopamine D1/D2 receptor agonist R(-)-10,11-dihydroxy-apomorphine (apomorphine) had no effect per se, but blocked quinelorane-induced increases in DOPAC concentrations in the median eminence. These results reveal that concurrent activation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors nullifies the actions of each of these receptors on tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons, which likely accounts for the lack of an acute effect of mixed dopamine D1/D2 receptor agonists on these hypothalamic dopamine neurons.     

Effects of full D1 dopamine receptor agonists on firing rates in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars compacta in vivo: tests for D1 receptor selectivity and comparisons to the partial agonist SKF 38393

Many studies have used the D1 agonist SKF 38393 to characterize D1 receptor influences on firing rates in basal ganglia nuclei in vivo. However, SKF 38393 is a partial agonist and so may not be ideal for delineating D1 receptor effects. This study characterizes the effects of four full D1 agonists, SKF 82958 (chloro-APB), SKF 81297 (6-chloro-PB), dihydrexidine and A-77636, on the firing rates of midbrain dopamine and globus pallidus neurons. Recordings were done in fully anesthetized or paralyzed, locally anesthetized rats, and drugs were given systemically intravenously. Dihydrexidine, SKF 81297 and A-77636 were free of rate effects on midbrain dopamine neurons (up to 10.2 mg/kg) and also did not antagonize the inhibitory effects of quinpirole. In contrast, SKF 82958 strongly inhibited dopamine cells through activation of D2 autoreceptors (ED50 = 0.70 mg/kg). Of these drugs, SKF 82958 also was the only one to increase pallidal unit firing rates when given alone (at 5.0 but not 1.0 mg/kg); the other compounds appeared to be selective for postsynaptic D1 receptors. The results suggest that SKF 82958 may be more properly classified as a mixed D1/D2 agonist. In addition, all four agonists strongly potentiated the pallidal response to quinpirole, demonstrating a D1 receptor potentiation of D2 receptor effects. The results support the role of D1 receptors in the midbrain and globus pallidus as previously characterized with SKF 38393. The similar actions of partial and full D1 agonists in these systems support evidence for a D1 receptor reserve and possibly an effector system other than adenylate cyclase.     

Constitutive activity of a chimeric D2/D1 dopamine receptor

Chimeric D1/D2 receptors were constructed to identify structural determinants of drug affinity and efficacy. We previously reported that chimeras that had D1 receptor transmembrane domain VII together with amino-terminal sequence from the D2 receptor were nonfunctional. D2/D1 chimeras were constructed that contained D2 receptor sequence at the amino- and carboxyl-terminal ends and D1 receptor sequence in the intervening region. Chimeric receptors with D2 sequence from transmembrane domain 7 to the carboxyl terminus together with D2 receptor sequence from the amino terminus through transmembrane helix 4 (D2[1-4,7]) and 5 (D2[1-5,7]) bound [3H]spiperone with high affinity, consistent with the hypothesis that D2 receptor transmembrane domain I or II is incompatible with D1 receptor transmembrane domain VII. D2[1-4,7] and D2[1-5,7] had affinities similar to D1 and D2 receptors for most nonselective dopamine antagonists and had affinities for most of the selective antagonists that were intermediate between those of the parent receptors. D2[1-4,7] and D2[1-5,7] mediated dopamine receptor agonist-induced stimulation and inhibition, respectively, of cAMP accumulation. The more efficient coupling of D2[1-5,7] to inhibition of cAMP accumulation, compared with the coupling of D2[5-7] and D2[3-7], supports the view that multiple D2 receptor cytoplasmic domains acting in concert are necessary for receptor activation of Gi. In contrast, D2[1-4,7], which contains only one cytoplasmic loop (the third) from the D1 receptor, is capable of activating Gs. D2[1-4,7] exhibited several characteristics of a constitutively active receptor, including enhanced basal (unliganded) stimulation of cAMP accumulation, high affinity for agonists even in the presence of GTP, and blunted agonist-stimulated cAMP accumulation. A number of dopamine receptor antagonists were inverse agonists at D2[1-4,7], inhibiting basal cAMP accumulation. Some of these drugs were also inverse agonists at the D1 receptor. Interestingly, several antagonists also potentiated forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation via D2[1-5,7] and via the D2 receptor, which could reflect inverse agonist inhibition of native constitutive activity of this receptor.     

Comparison between beta 3 and beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists as inhibitors of gastric acid secretion

In order to investigate the role of beta 3 adrenoceptors in the regulation of gastric acid secretion we studied the effects of compound SR58611A (a selective agonist for atypical beta adrenoceptors), alone or in combination with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, in the gastric fistula of a conscious cat. The effects of SR58611A were compared with those of clenbuterol, a selective agonist for beta 2 adrenoceptors. Intravenous infusion of SR58611A (0.3-3 mumol/kg/h) caused a dose-dependent, but partial, inhibition of the acid secretory response to 2-deoxy-D-glucose 100 mg/kg i.v., maximum effect not exceeding 40%. Clenbuterol (0.03-0.1 mumol/kg/h) caused a similar effect (maximum inhibition about 50%) at doses approximately 30 times lower. The acid secretion induced by the histamine H2-receptor agonist dimaprit (1 mumol/kg/h) was minimally affected by both beta adrenoceptor agonists. The inhibitory effect of SR58611A (3 mumol/kg/h) on 2-deoxy-D-glucose-induced acid secretion was not modified by pretreatment with the non-selective beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol, administered at doses (1.5 mumol/kg iv) that completely blocked the inhibitory effect of clenbuterol (0.1 mumol/kg/h). In contrast, bupranolol (10 mumol/kg i.v.) (a drug endowed with beta 3 antagonistic properties) prevented the inhibitory effects of both SR58611A and clenbuterol. The present data provide functional evidence that, besides beta 2-, also beta 3-adrenoceptors can have negative effects on gastric acid secretion, particularly when it is stimulated by indirect stimuli, like 2-deoxy-D-glucose. This gastric antisecretory activity may represent an additional mechanism for the physio-pharmacological control of gastric acid secretion.