The application of SEAT values for predicting how compliant seats with backrests influence vibration discomfort

The extent to which a seat can provide useful attenuation of vehicle vibration depends on three factors: the characteristics of the vehicle motion, the vibration transmissibility of the seat, and the sensitivity of the body to vibration. The ‘seat effective amplitude transmissibility’ (i.e., SEAT value) reflects how these three factors vary with the frequency and the direction of vibration so as to predict the vibration isolation efficiency of a seat. The SEAT value is mostly used to select seat cushions or seat suspensions based on the transmission of vertical vibration to the principal supporting surface of a seat. This study investigated the accuracy of SEAT values in predicting how seats with backrests influence the discomfort caused by multiple-input vibration. Twelve male subjects participated in a four-part experiment to determine equivalent comfort contours, the relative discomfort, the location of discomfort, and seat transmissibility with three foam seats and a rigid reference seat at 14 frequencies of vibration in the range 1–20 Hz at magnitudes of vibration from 0.2 to 1.6 ms⁻² r.m.s. The ‘measured seat dynamic discomfort’ (MSDD) was calculated for each foam seat from the ratio of the vibration acceleration required to cause similar discomfort with the foam seat and with the rigid reference seat. Using the frequency weightings in current standards, the SEAT values of each seat were calculated from the ratio of overall ride values with the foam seat to the overall ride values with the rigid reference seat, and compared to the corresponding MSDD at each frequency. The SEAT values provided good predictions of how the foam seats increased vibration discomfort at frequencies around the 4-Hz resonance but reduced vibration discomfort at frequencies greater than about 6.3 Hz, with discrepancies explained by a known limitation of the frequency weightings.     

Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

Effects of elastic seats on seated body apparent mass responses to vertical whole body vibration

Apparent mass (AM) responses of the body seated with and without a back support on three different elastic seats (flat and contoured polyurethane foam (PUF) and air cushion) and a rigid seat were measured under three levels of vertical vibration (overall rms acceleration: 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s²) in the 0.5 to 20 Hz range. A pressure-sensing system was used to capture biodynamic force at the occupant-seat interface. The results revealed strong effects of visco-elastic and vibration transmissibility characteristics of seats on AM. The response magnitudes with the relatively stiff air seat were generally higher than those with the PUF seats except at low frequencies. The peak magnitude decreased when sitting condition was changed from no back support to a vertical support; the reduction however was more pronounced with the air seat. Further, a relatively higher frequency shift was evident with soft seat compared with stiff elastic seat with increasing excitation.     

Bedside safety rails: assessment of strength requirements and the appropriateness of current designs

This second paper in a series of studies of the discomfort produced by multi-axis vibration is concerned with rotational seat vibration. The effects of level, frequency and direction of the roll, pitch and yaw vibration of a firm flat seat have been studied in two experiments. At octave centre frequencies in the range 1-31.5 Hz the first experiment determined the levels of roll, pitch and yaw seat vibration which caused discomfort equivalent to 0-5 and l.25m/s²r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration. In the second experiment, comfort contours equivalent to 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration were determined from 18 males and 18 females at preferred third-octave centre frequencies from 1 to 31.5 Hz. In all cases the axis of rotation passed through the centre of the seat surface. There was no vibration of the feet and no backrest.

It was concluded that the shape of equivalent comfort contours need not normally depend on vibration, level. Both individual and group equivalent comfort contours are presented. Although there were significant correlations between subject size and subject relative discomfort it is not thought that these correlations have much practical application. In all three axes the median contours of vibration acceleration increase in proportion to vibration frequency. Sensitivity is greatest for roll vibration and least for yaw vibration of the seat.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m.s^-2 rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m x s(-2) rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

Transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the head

A series of experiments has investigated the transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the heads of seated subjects. Head motion was measured in all six axes using a light-weight bite-bar while seated subjects were exposed to random motion at frequencies of up to 5 Hz at 1.0 rad.s ^?2 r.m.s. Subjects sat on a rigid flat seat in two body postures: ‘back-on’ (back in contact with backrest) and ‘back-off’ (no backrest contact). The influence of the position of the centre of rotation was also investigated.

Motion at the head occurred mostly in the lateral, roll and yaw axes during exposure to roll seat vibration and in the fore-and-aft, vertical and pitch axes during exposure to pitch seat vibration. A reduction in the magnitude of head motion occurred when the subjects sat in a 'back-off' posture compared with a 'back-on' posture. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the lateral axis during roll seat vibration affected vertical and pitch head motion: least head motion occurred when the centre of rotation was in line with the subject's mid-sagittal plane. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the vertical axis during roll seat vibration affected head motion in the mid-coronal plane: roll head motion decreased as the position of the centre of rotation was raised from below the seat surface to above the seat surface. Varying the centre of rotation (along the fore-and-aft and vertical axes) during pitch seat vibration altered head motion in the mid-sagittal plane. Head motion increased with increasing distance of the centre of rotation in front or behind the subject's ischial tuberosities and increased as the seat was raised from below the centre of rotation to above the centre of rotation.     

Equivalent comfort contours for vertical seat vibration: effect of vibration magnitude and backrest inclination

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency and magnitude of vertical seat vibration influence vibration discomfort. Subjects experienced vertical seat vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5-25 Hz at vibration magnitudes in the range 0.016-2.0 ms(-2) r.m.s. Equivalent comfort contours were determined with five backrest conditions: no backrest, and with a stationary backrest inclined at 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90°. Within all conditions, the frequency of greatest sensitivity to acceleration decreased with increasing vibration magnitude. Compared to an upright backrest, around the main resonance of the body, the vibration magnitudes required to cause similar discomfort were 100% greater with 60° and 90° backrest inclinations and 50% greater with a 30° backrest inclination. It is concluded that no single frequency weighting provides an accurate prediction of the discomfort caused by vertical seat vibration at all magnitudes and with all backrest conditions. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Vertical seat vibration is a main cause of vibration discomfort for drivers and passengers of road vehicles. A frequency weighting has been standardised for the evaluation of vertical seat vibration when sitting upright but it was not known whether this weighting is suitable for the reclined sitting postures often adopted during travel.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration

Frequency weightings for predicting vibration discomfort assume the same frequency-dependence at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic studies show that the frequency-dependence of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated how the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort depends on the acceleration and the force at the subject–seat interface. Using magnitude estimation, 20 males and 20 females judged their discomfort caused by sinusoidal vertical acceleration at 13 frequencies (1–16 Hz) at magnitudes from 0.1 to 4.0 ms^? 2 r.m.s. The frequency-dependence of their equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration, but was less dependent on the magnitude of dynamic force than the magnitude of acceleration, consistent with the biodynamic non-linearity of the body causing some of the magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours. There were significant associations between the biodynamic responses and subjective responses at all frequencies in the range 1–16 Hz.

Practitioner Summary: Vertical seat vibration causes discomfort in many forms of transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort over a range of vibration magnitudes and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved.     

Equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft,lateral, and vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 1.0 to 10 Hz

Abstract

Standards assume vibration discomfort depends on the frequency and direction of whole-body vibration, with the same weightings for frequency and direction at all magnitudes. This study determined equivalent comfort contours from 1.0 to 10?Hz in each of three directions (fore-and-aft, lateral, vertical) at magnitudes in the range 0.1 to 3.5?ms^?2?r.m.s. Twenty-four subjects sat on a rigid flat seat with and without a beanbag, altering the pressure distribution on the seat but not the transmission of vibration. The rate of growth of vibration discomfort with increasing magnitude of vibration differed between the directions of vibration and varied with the frequency of vibration. The frequency-dependence and direction-dependence of discomfort, therefore, depended on the magnitude of vibration. The beanbag did not affect the frequency-dependence or direction-dependence of vibration discomfort. It is concluded that different weightings for the frequency and direction of vibration are required for low and high magnitude vibration.

Practitioner summary: When evaluating whole-body vibration to predict vibration discomfort, the weightings appropriate to different frequencies and different directions of vibration should depend on the magnitude of vibration. This is overlooked in all current methods of evaluating the severity of whole-body vibration.     

Subjective response of standing persons exposed to fore-aft,lateral and vertical whole-body vibration

The aims of this study were to propose multiply scale factors for evaluation of discomfort of standing persons and to investigate whether there exist differences between multiplying factors used for evaluation of discomfort of standing persons and those of seated persons exposed to WBV. Twelve male subjects were exposed to twenty-seven stimuli that comprise three acceleration magnitudes (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 m/s² r.m.s.) along fore-aft (x), lateral (y) or vertical (z) direction. The subjects with seated or standing posture on the platform of the vibration test rig rated the subjective discomfort for each stimulus that has frequency contents ranging from 1.0 Hz to 20 Hz with a constant power spectrum density. The order of presentation of the test stimuli was fully randomized and each stimulus was repeated three times. The subjective scale for discomfort was calculated by using the category judgment method. The best combinations of multiplying factors were determined by calculating correlation coefficients of regression curves in-between subjective ratings and vibration magnitudes. In all the directions, body posture significantly influenced on subjective discomfort scales. Particularly in the fore-aft and lateral direction, the upper limit of all the categories for the standing posture resulted in higher vibration acceleration magnitudes than those for the seated posture. In contrast, in the vertical direction, only the upper limit of category “1: Not uncomfortable” for standing posture was observed to be higher than that for seated posture. The best agreement for ISO-weighted vibration acceleration occurred at x factor of 1.8 and y factor of 1.8 in the standing posture and x factor of 2.8 and y factor of 1.8 in the seated posture. The results suggest that seated people respond more sensitively and severely in perception of discomfort to fore-aft and lateral vibration than standing people do while standing people respond more sensitively and severely to vertical vibration than seated people do. Thus the effects of body postures on multiplying factors should be considered in evaluation of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration.Relevance to industryThis study reports differences in subjective response of standing persons to fore-aft, lateral and vertical whole-body vibration. The results obtained in this study propose the fundamental data on the sensitivity to whole-body vibration exposed with standing posture.     

Vibration and comfort HI. Translational vibration of the feet and back

The effects on discomfort of the frequency and direction of the translational vibration of a footrest and flat firm backrest have been studied in two experiments. At frequencies in the range 2.5-63 Hz, the first experiment determined the levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration of the feet of seated subjects which caused them discomfort equivalent to that from 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical vibration of a firm flat seat. The levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration at the back of a seat which were equivalent to 0.8 m/s² r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration were determined in the second experiment. The vibration of the feet or back occurred without simultaneous vibration at the seat.

Individual and group equivalent comfort contours are presented. It is concluded that the data provide a useful initial indication of the relative contribution of foot and back vibration to discomfort. Equivalent comfort contours for foot vibration were similar for all three directions of vibration. The contours for vibration of the back show a high sensitivity to fore-and-aft vibration. The results obtained from two additional studies show that vibration from a backrest and other variations in seating conditions can influence subject comfort.     

Vibration and comfort I. Translational seat vibration

A series of studies of discomfort caused by multi-axis vibration at the seat, feet and back of seated persons is described. This first paper reports on studies with translational seat vibration. Two experiments concerned with the effects of level, frequency and direction of the translational vibration of a firm flat seat are reported.

At octave centre frequencies from 1 to 63 Hz the first experiment determined the levels of fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical seat vibration which caused discomfort equivalent to 0.5 and l.25m/s²r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration. In the second experiment, comfort contours equivalent to 0.8m/s²r.m.s. 10 Hz vertical seat vibration and subject transmissibilities were determined from 18 males and 18 females at preferred third-octave centre frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz. In both studies the feet of subjects were not vibrated and there was no backrest.

It was concluded that the shapes of equivalent comfort contours need not normally depend on vibration level. The forms of both individual and group equivalent comfort contours and seat-to-head transmissibilities are presented. Significant correlations were found between subject characteristics (size and transmissibility) and subject relative discomfort. The males and females produced similar equivalent comfort contours.

Information on the computerized application of the method of constant stimuli which was developed for the series of experiments is presented together with a consideration of alternative methods of determining the central tendency of the data. A method of assessing the effect of vibrator distortion on judgements of equivalent discomfort is also defined.     

The effect of posture and vibration magnitude on the vertical vibration transmissibility of tractor suspension system

The efficiency of suspension seat can be influenced by several factors such as the input vibration, the dynamic characteristics of the seat and the dynamic characteristics of the human body. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of sitting postures and vibration magnitude on the vibration transmissibility of a suspension system of an agricultural tractor seat. Eleven (11) healthy male subjects participated in the study. All subjects were asked to sit on the suspension system. Four (4) different sitting postures were investigated – i) “relax”, ii) “slouch”, iii) “tense”, and iv) “with backrest support”. All subjects were exposed to random vertical vibration in the range of 1–20 Hz, at three vibration magnitudes - 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² r.m.s for 60 s. The results showed that there were three pronounced peaks in the seat transmissibility, with the primary resonance was found at 1.75–2.5 Hz for every sitting postures. The “backrest” condition had the highest transmissibility resonance (1.46), while the “slouch” posture had the highest Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT) values (64.7%). Changes in vibration magnitude for “relax” posture from 0.5 to 2.0 m/s² r.m.s resulted in greater reduction in the primary resonance frequency of seat transmissibility. The SEAT values decreased with increased vibration magnitude. It can be suggested that variations in posture and vibration magnitude affected the vibration transmission through the suspension system, indicating the non-linear effect on the interaction between the human body and the suspension system.Relevance to industry: Investigating the posture adopted during agricultural activities, and the effects of various magnitudes of vibration on the suspension system's performance are beneficial to the industry. The findings regarding their influence on the human body may be used to optimize the suspension system's performance.     

The Effect of Rotational Vibration In Roll and Pitch Axes on the Discomfort of Seated Subjects

An experiment was performed to investigate the effects of vibration level, frequency and foot position on the discomfort of seated persons subjected to sinusoidal vibration in roll and pitch axes. Using the method of category production eight seated subjects adjusted roll and pitch vibrations lo levels described as ‘uncomfortable’ on a given semantic scale. The axes of rotation were located on the same horizontal plane as the ischial tuberosities of the subjects. In each axis subjects assessed the discomfort of six frequencies (1-6, 20, 40. 80, 160, 31-5 Hz) for each of four different heights of a stationary foot-rest and a condition where no foot-rest was used.

For all conditions where a foot-rest was present rotational vibration in roll produced greater discomfort than the same level of rotational vibration in pitch. Sensitivity to relational acceleration decreased with increasing frequency in both roll and pitch axes for all foot positions. Subjects became less sensitive lo rotational vibration in roll and especially pitch as foot height was raised. This was attributed lo the decreased contact between the rotating seal and the thighs at higher foot positions.     

In-vehicle vibration study of child safety seats

This paper reports experimental measurements of the in-vehicle vibrational behaviour of stage 0&1 child safety seats. Road tests were performed for eight combinations of child, child seat and automobile. Four accelerometers were installed in the vehicles and orientated to measure as closely as possible in the vertical direction; two were attached to the floor and two located at the human interfaces. An SAE pad was placed under the ischial tuberosities of the driver at the seat cushion and a child pad, designed for the purpose of this study, was placed under the child. Four test runs were made over a pave’ (cobblestone) surface for the driver's seat and four for the child seat at both 20?km?h^?1 and 40?km?h^?1. Power spectral densities were determined for all measurement points and acceleration transmissibility functions (ATFs) were estimated from the floor of the vehicle to the human interfaces. The system composed of automobile seat, child seat and child was found to transmit greater vibration than the system composed of automobile seat and driver. The ensemble mean transmissibility in the frequency range from 1 to 60 Hz was found to be 77% for the child seats systems as opposed to 61% for the driver's seats. The acceleration transmissibility for the child seat system was found to be higher than that of the driver's seat at most frequencies above 10 Hz for all eight systems tested. The measured ATFs suggest that the principal whole-body vibration resonance of the children occurred at a mean frequency of 8.5, rather than the 3.5 to 5.0 Hz typically found in the case of seated adults. It can be concluded that current belt-fastened child seats are less effective than the vehicle primary seating systems in attenuating vibrational disturbances. The results also suggest the potential inability of evaluating child comfort by means of existing whole-body vibration standards.     

Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration

Subjective response to seated, fore-and-aft direction, whole-body vibration of the type experienced in automobiles was investigated. Fore-and-aft acceleration was measured at the seat guide of a small automobile when driving over two representative road surfaces, and was replicated in a laboratory setting using a whole-body vibration test rig and rigid seat. A single 15 s section of each of the two acceleration time histories was band-pass filtered to the frequency interval from 0.5 to 50.5 Hz, and was used as a base stimulus. Thirteen test stimuli were then constructed for each base stimulus by rescaling to BS 6841 W_d frequency-weighted r.m.s. amplitudes from 0.01 to 0.86 m/s². Two groups of 16 participants (8 male and 8 female in each case) rated the discomfort of the test stimuli. The first group was asked to use the psychophysical method of magnitude estimation while the second used a Borg CR-10 scale. The order of presentation of the test stimuli was fully randomised and each was repeated three times. For each group of participants, regression analysis was used to determine both the individual and the group mean Stevens’ Power Law exponent describing the relationship between stimulus amplitude and subjective response. All mean power exponents were found to be less than unity, with the CR-10 scale having produced smaller exponents than magnitude estimation. The power exponents ranged from 0.66 to 0.91, corroborating the value of 0.84 obtainable from the guidelines of standard BS 6841.The results suggest that the numerical response scale provided in the BS 6841 guidelines is appropriate for use in the case of automobile fore-and-aft vibration, but that the semantic labels under-represent the actual human subjective response in this direction. Psychophysical test method, vibration stimulus range and test participant gender were all found to affect the Stevens’ Power Law exponent achieved from subjective testing. Each factor may therefore require control when attempting to compare human responses to vibration originating from different automobiles.     

The effects of the duration on the subjective discomfort of a rigid seat and a cushioned automobile seat

The subjective discomfort caused by the seat would affect the judgements of discomfort for the seated subjects. However, there have been few studies concerned with the discomfort on the rigid seat in static states, especially for a relatively long duration. This paper investigated the subjective discomfort caused by a rigid seat and a cushioned automobile seat for an hour. Twelve students (eight males and four females) rated the overall discomfort on a category-ratio scale and the local body discomfort on a 6-point rating scale every 10 min caused by two seats in two separate days. The static discomfort increased with increasing time, and the rigid seat caused greater discomfort than the cushioned seat. The local discomfort on the back dominated on the automobile seat, whereas the local discomfort on the buttock area dominated on the rigid seat. We established the empirical equations to predict the relations between the discomfort and duration of the two types of seats, for benchmark in the future studies on vibration and noise discomfort.     

The effect of seat back inclination on spine height changes

The effect of backrest inclination on spinal height changes was tested during static sitting and seated whole-body vibrations. The vibration input was sinusoidal with a frequency of 5 Hz and an acceleration of 0.1 g rms. The backrest inclinations tested were 110 degrees and 120 degrees . The 110 degrees backrest caused less shrinkage than did the 120 degrees during static sitting, whereas the opposite was true when vibration was present, although the differences between the backrests were not statistically significant. Only when the results were compared with results from exposure to unsupported sitting were the differences statistically significant for both static sitting and seated vibrations when the 110 degrees backrest was used and for vibration with the 120 degrees backrest. Thus we conclude that an inclined backrest reduces the effects of vibration. More importantly, emphasis should be placed upon seats and seat materials that can attenuate vibration.     

Fore-and-aft and dual-axis vibration of the seated human body: Nonlinearity,cross-axis coupling,and associations between resonances in the transmissibility and apparent mass

This study examined how the apparent mass and transmissibility of the human body depend on the magnitude of fore-and-aft vibration excitation and the presence of vertical vibration. Fore-and-aft and vertical acceleration at five locations along the spine, and pitch acceleration at the pelvis, were measured in 12 seated male subjects during fore-and-aft random vibration excitation (0.25–20 Hz) at three vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s.). With the greatest magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, vertical vibration was added at 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s. Forces in the fore-and-aft and vertical directions on the seat surface were measured to calculate apparent masses. Transmissibilities and apparent masses during fore-and-aft excitation showed a principal resonance around 1 Hz and a secondary resonance around 2–3 Hz. Increasing the magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, or adding vertical excitation, decreased the magnitudes of the resonances. At the primary resonance frequency, the dominant mode induced by fore-and-aft excitation involved bending of the lumbar spine and the lower thoracic spine with shear deformation of tissues at the ischial tuberosities. The relative contributions to this mode from each body segment (especially the pelvis and the lower thoracic spine) varied with vibration magnitude. The nonlinearities in the apparent mass and transmissibility during dual-axis excitation indicate coupling between the principal mode of the seated human body excited by fore-and-aft excitation and the cross-axis influence of vertical excitation.Relevance to industryUnderstanding movements of the body during exposure to whole-body vibration can assist the optimisation of seating dynamics and help to control the effects of the vibration on human comfort, performance, and health. This study suggests cross-axis nonlinearity in biodynamic responses to vibration should be considered when optimising vibration environments.