Genetic causes of type 2 diabetes

The characterisation of the intracellular signal transmission regulating the secretion of insulin from the beta cells of the pancreatic islets has enabled the initiation of massive effort to find the genetic causes of beta cell dysfunction in Type II diabetes. The search for genetic determinants began when several genes involved in the mechanisms of insulin secretion were cloned in the human genoma, and when informative polymorphism was described within or in the vicinity of these genes. The rational approach to identify the putative genes causing diabetes would be to examine genes which encode for proteins likely to be important in the beta cell control of insulin secretion. A large number of mutations which cause Type II diabetes have been found recently. Type II diabetes is therefore probably a heterogenous disease, with a polygenic inheritance of a combination of major and minor genes affecting obesity, insulin secretion, and insulin action. Thus, a genotypic classification of Type II diabetes will eventually be possible, and it might also be possible to explain the sometimes puzzling observations made in diabetes research by the heterogeneity of Type II diabetes and the interaction between environmental and genetic factors.     

Insulin resistance implications for type II diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease

PURPOSE: To review information on the implications of insulin resistance for type II diabetes mellitus (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) and coronary heart disease, and to derive guidance from this information for the management of these conditions. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between 1985 and July 1996, and review of the bibliographies of articles obtained through the MEDLINE search and textbooks. STUDY SELECTION: Primary research articles, reviews and perspectives on the epidemiology of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases and on intervention outcomes in these diseases. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design and quality were assessed, with particular attention to methods, study population size and other characteristics. Conclusions of review articles and perspectives were analyzed critically. DATA SYNTHESIS: Type II diabetes is associated with a two- to fourfold excess of coronary heart disease, compared to nondiabetic populations. In most studies, glycemia and duration of clinical diabetes were found to be only weak risk factors for coronary heart disease. Conventional coronary heart disease risk factors such as dyslipidemia and hypertension have been associated with coronary heart disease in type II diabetes subjects. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance have been predictive of the development of type II diabetes and, in some studies, of coronary heart disease. CONCLUSION: Strategies to prevent the development of coronary heart disease in diabetic and possibly prediabetic subjects should emphasize a multifactorial approach, including: a) improved glycemic control; b) aggressive treatment of risk factors for coronary heart disease, including insulin resistance; c) primary prevention of NIDDM; and d) use of glucose lowering agents that improve insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors.     

Predictive value of biological markers in etiopathogenesis of juvenile diabetes--reviewing the role of insulin antibodies

The lack of complete concordance for diseases in monozygotic twins prevents application of genetic markers for a thorough identification of the subjects who will develop the type I diabetes. Furthermore, the impact of the environmental factors precipitating beta cells destruction in genetically sensitive subjects has not been completely enlightened yet. The identification of high risk markers for the development of diabetes is aimed at detection of the early immune response activation markers. Islet cell antibodies are the most valuable markers, whose presence can be discovered even up to 7-8 years prior to the onset of symptoms. They are found in 50-80% of the newly discovered insulin-dependent diabetics. Their prevalence in the general population is 0.5-2%. These are commonly concomitant with insulin antibodies, found in 20-40% of the newly discovered diabetics, as reported in the literature. In our circumstances it was possible to determine the insulin antibodies only. We have concluded that they appear in 13.6% of children with a newly discovered diabetes, presenting a significant marker for predicting the course of the disease.     

An autosomal genomic scan for loci linked to prediabetic phenotypes in Pima Indians

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a common chronic disease that is thought to have a substantial genetic basis. Identification of the genes responsible has been hampered by the complex nature of the syndrome. Abnormalities in insulin secretion and insulin action predict the development of type 2 diabetes and are, themselves, highly heritable traits. Since fewer genes may contribute to these precursors of type 2 diabetes than to the overall syndrome, such genes may be easier to identify. We, therefore, undertook an autosomal genomic scan to identify loci linked to prediabetic traits in Pima Indians, a population with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes. 363 nondiabetic Pima Indians were genotyped at 516 polymorphic microsatellite markers on all 22 autosomes. Linkage analyses were performed using three methods (single-marker, nonparametric multipoint [MAPMAKER/SIBS], and variance components multipoint). These analyses provided evidence for linkage at several chromosomal regions, including 3q21-24 linked to fasting plasma insulin concentration and in vivo insulin action, 4p15-q12 linked to fasting plasma insulin concentration, 9q21 linked to 2-h insulin concentration during oral glucose tolerance testing, and 22q12-13 linked to fasting plasma glucose concentration. These results suggest loci that may harbor genes contributing to type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. None of the linkages exceeded a LOD score of 3.6 (a 5% probability of occurring in a genome-wide scan). These findings must, therefore, be considered tentative until extended in this population or replicated in others.     

Dissecting the genetics of type 1 diabetes: relevance for familial clustering and differences in incidence

A combination of genetic and environmental factors is most likely the cause of Type 1 diabetes. Results from twin data, familial clustering of the disease and difference in incidence according to ethnicity infer the presence of specific disease genes. The genetic component of Type 1 diabetes cannot be classified according to a classical model of inheritance but is due to an interaction between different genes and environmental factors. The major genes are within the HLA region that are responsible for 40% of the genetic susceptibility, although other genes are important (non-HLA genes). To date, more than 10 specific loci have been localized on different chromosomes. The gene involved has been characterized only for two of such loci, IDDM1 and IDDM2, while in the other cases the presence of some susceptibility genes can be envisaged and their identification represents the goal of genetic research in coming years. Fine mapping of the loci will certainly increase our understanding of the genetics of Type 1 diabetes; the limitation in detecting some of the remaining genes by linkage studies can be overcome by association studies. That is possible via the collection of a large number of affected families (over 1000) in homogeneous populations.     

Resistance of NOD mice to salmonellosis

The NOD mouse strain has become one of the most popular animal models for exploring insulin dependent type 1 diabetes. Genetic studies have underlined the polygenic nature of the murine disease. Two such genes were mapped on chromosome 1. One, associated with diabetes onset, is strongly linked with the Lsh, Ity, bcg genes encoding for resistance against L. donovani, S. typhimurium and Mycobacterium. We have undertaken to phenotype NOD mice with regard to one of these resistance genes. After infection with Salmonella abortusovis, we found that NOD mice bore the resistant phenotype/Ityr, which is responsible for early resistance against Salmonella infection.     

Genetic susceptibility to the development of autoimmune disease

1. Autoimmune diseases are common conditions which appear to develop in genetically susceptible individuals, with expression of disease being modified by permissive and protective environments. Familial clustering and data from twin studies provided the impetus for the search for putative loci. Both the candidate gene approach in population-based case-control studies and entire genome screening in families have helped identify susceptibility genes in a number of autoimmune diseases. 2. After the first genome screen in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus it seems likely that most autoimmune diseases are polygenic with no single gene being either necessary or sufficient for disease development. Of the organ-specific autoimmune diseases, genome screens have now been completed in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, the clustering of autoimmune diseases within the same individuals suggests that the same genes may be involved in the different diseases. This is supported by data showing that both HLA (human leucocyte antigen) and CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated-4) appear to be involved in the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and Graves' disease. 3. Genome screens have also been completed in some of the non-organ-specific autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis. Many candidate genes have also been investigated although these are predominantly in population-based case-control studies. 4. Substantial progress has been made in recent years towards the identification of susceptibility loci in autoimmune diseases. The inconsistencies seen between case-control studies may largely be due to genetic mismatching between cases and controls in small datasets. Family-based association studies are being increasingly used to confirm genetic linkages and help with fine mapping strategies. It will, however, require a combination of biology and genetics, as has been necessary with the major histocompatibility complex in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, to identify primary aetiological mutations.     

The genetics of human noninsulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus

Familial aggregation and concordance in monozygotic and dizygotic twins argue strongly for a genetic etiology to noninsulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Nonetheless, studies of pathways implicated by the known physiology have failed to identify gene defects that can explain the genetic susceptibility. In contrast, studies of early onset dominant diabetes have revealed three major loci resulting in diminished insulin secretion. Recently, studies have taken a new approach to map the genes causing typical NIDDM using large numbers of families or sibling pairs. The first reports of these studies have suggested possible loci on chromosomes 1, 2 and 12, but no report has been confirmed. Other studies have examined the quantitative defects that may be precursors of clinical NIDDM such as hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, insulin response to glucose and obesity. These studies have suggested additional loci that may contribute to NIDDM susceptibility, but the genes responsible for most of these loci remain unknown. Studies of NIDDM susceptibility and the role of obesity genes in that susceptibility have entered an exciting new phase, but the challenges of complex disease genetics in humans will have to be conquered to translate this research into preventive or therapeutic benefits.     

Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects

A definitive assessment of the relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in the etiology of NIDDM is hampered by several problems. 1) Due to better methodology, data on insulin resistance are generally more accurate and consistent than data on insulin deficiency. 2) In source data, case-control studies are prone to selection bias, while epidemiological associations, whether cross-sectional or longitudinal, are liable to misinterpretation. 3) Insulin secretion and action are physiologically interconnected at multiple levels, so that an initial defect in either is likely to lead with time to a deficit in the companion function. The fact that both insulin resistance and impaired insulin release have been found to precede and predict NIDDM in prospective studies may be in part a reflection of just such relatedness. 4) Direct genetic analysis is effective in rarer forms of glucose intolerance (MODY, mitochondrial mutations, etc.) but encounters serious difficulties with typical late-onset NIDDM. Despite these uncertainties, the weight of current evidence supports the view that insulin resistance is very important in the etiology of typical NIDDM for the following reasons: 1) it is found in the majority of patients with the manifest disease; 2) it is only partially reversible by any form of treatment (117); 3) it can be traced back through earlier stages of IGT and high-risk conditions; and 4) it predicts subsequent development of the disease with remarkable consistency in both prediabetic and normoglycemic states. Of conceptual importance is also the fact that the key cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle insulin resistance (defective stimulation of glucose transport, phosphorylation, and storage into glycogen) have been confirmed in NIDDM subjects by a variety of in vivo techniques [ranging from catheter balance (118) to multiple tracer kinetics (119) to 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (120)], and have been detected also in normoglycemic NIDDM offspring (121). If insulin resistance is a characteristic finding in many cases of NIDDM, insulin-sensitive NIDDM does exist. On the other hand, given the tight homeostatic control of plasma glucose levels in humans, beta-cell dysfunction, relative or absolute, is a sine qua non for the development of diabetes. If insulin deficiency must be present whereas insulin resistance may be present, is this proof that the former is etiologically primary to the latter? If so, do we have convincing evidence that the primacy of insulin deficiency is genetic in nature? The answer to both questions is negative on several accounts. The defect in insulin secretion in overt NIDDM is functionally severe but anatomically modest: beta-cell mass is reduced by 20-40% in patients with long-standing NIDDM (122). Moreover, the insulin secretory deficit is progressively worse with more severe hyperglycemia (123) and recovers considerably upon improving glycemic control (124). These observations indicate that part of the insulin deficiency is acquired (through glucose toxicity, lipotoxicity, or both). In addition, although insulin deficiency is necessary for diabetes, it may not always be sufficient to cause NIDDM. In fact, subtle defects in the beta-cell response to glucose may be widespread in the population (108, 125) and only cause frank hyperglycemia when obesity/insulin resistance stress the secretory machinery. Conceivably, there could be beta-cell dysfunction without NIDDM just as there is insulin resistance without diabetes. Incidentally, any defect in insulin secretion, whether in normoglycemic or hyperglycemic persons, could be due to other factors than primary beta-cell dysfunction: amyloid deposits in the pancreas (126), changes in insulin secretagogues (amylin, GLP-1, GIP, galanin) (127-130), early intrauterine malnutrition (131). Finally, the predictive power of early changes in insulin secretion for the development of typical NIDDM is generally lower than that of insulin     

Diabetic nephropathy. Its relationship to hypertension and means of pharmacological intervention

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are common chronic conditions which frequently coexist. Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of elevated blood pressure in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Diabetic nephropathy, arterial sclerosis, obesity and association of essential hypertension can be the causes of hypertension in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has revealed that the nocturnal fall of blood pressure is blunted in patients with diabetic nephropathy. A blunted diurnal blood pressure variation is seen in microalbuminuric diabetic patients and even in some normoalbuminuric patients. Accumulating data suggest that normalisation of blood pressure in hypertensive IDDM patients is most important to minimise the loss of kidney function. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been reported to be effective in postponing the development of nephropathy and in slowing its progression. Whether only ACE inhibitors have such beneficial renal effects on diabetic nephropathy is under discussion. While many studies have suggested that insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia are related to an elevated blood pressure in hypertensive patients, there does not seem to be enough evidence to prove that insulin per se can raise blood pressure in humans. Neither an insulin infusion within a physiological range nor sustained hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance (e.g. patients with insulinoma, cystic ovary syndrome) have been associated with an elevated blood pressure. Insulin resistance in some hypertensive patients may be a consequence of a decreased blood flow due to an increased peripheral resistance. Preliminary evidence suggests that low birth weight or impaired fetal growth is related to hypertension and NIDDM. Familial clustering of diabetic nephropathy suggests the contribution of genetic susceptibility and/or environmental inheritance. The frequent association of nephropathy with hypertension has led to research on the genes related to hypertension (ACE, angiotensinogen). Nevertheless, to date no reliable and clinically useful genetic marker has been found. Attempts to correct the metabolic abnormalities derived from diabetes are a new topic in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. The effects of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (antihypercholesterolaemic drugs), aldose reductase inhibitors (inhibitors of the polyol pathway) and glycation inhibitors (inhibitors of formation of advanced glycosylation end-products) on diabetic nephropathy have been evaluated in animal studies and in some clinical trials. Thus far, results with HMG CoA reductase and aldose reductase inhibitors have been somewhat conflicting. The potential therapeutic role of glycation inhibition in the treatment of diabetes deserves further study.     

Variations in the vitamin D-binding protein (Gc locus) are associated with oral glucose tolerance in nondiabetic Pima Indians

Electrophoretic variants of the vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) have been associated with type 2 diabetes as well as with metabolic characteristics that predispose to type 2 diabetes in several populations. The Gc gene that encodes DBP maps to chromosome 4q12, a region that has recently been found to be potentially linked to plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in Pima Indians. Therefore, the gene that encodes DBP was analyzed as a candidate gene for our linkage findings in the Pima Indians. Sequence analysis of the coding exons identified two previously described missense polymorphisms at codons 416 and 420, which are the genetic basis for the three common electrophoretic variants of DBP (Gc1f, Gc1s, and Gc2). These variants in DBP were associated with differences in oral glucose tolerance in nondiabetic Pima Indians.     

Modern views on etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease

The aetiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains, despite vast progress, not fully understood. Four genes involved in the development of the disease have been identified. Three fully penetrant ones (the amyloid beta-protein precursor on chromosome 21, presenilin 1 on chromosome 14, and presenilin 2 on chromosome 1) lead to the development of relatively rare familial form of AD. Together, they account for about half of this early-onset form of the disease. One genetic risk factor--polipoprotein E-4--is associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease while at least two others are proposed. None of these genes can be by now adopted for use as a diagnostic or predictive test for Alzheimer's disease. Apart from the above, some environmental factors are also implicated in pathogenesis of the disease with the amyloid cascade hypothesis being the most commonly accepted as central. In the presented paper we have critically reviewed a literature on etiopatogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and discussed some practical consequences of the progress in understanding the mechanism of the disease.     

The genetic basis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: impaired insulin secretion versus impaired insulin sensitivity

Despite the fact that it is the prevalent view that insulin resistance is the main genetic factor predisposing to development of type 2 diabetes, review of several lines of evidence in the literature indicates a lack of overwhelming support for this concept. In fact, the literature better supports the case of impaired insulin secretion being the initial and main genetic factor predisposing to type 2 diabetes, especially 1) the studies in people at high risk to subsequently develop type 2 diabetes (discordant monozygotic twins and women with previous gestational diabetes), 2) the studies demonstrating compete alleviation of insulin resistance with weight loss, and 3) the studies finding that people with type 2 diabetes or IGT can have impaired insulin secretion and no insulin resistance compared with well matched NGT subjects. The fact that insulin resistance may be largely an acquired problem in no way lessens its importance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Life style changes (exercise, weight reduction) and pharmacological agents (e.g., biguanides and thiazolidendiones) that reduce insulin resistance or increase insulin sensitivity clearly have major beneficial effects (122, 144-146, 153-155).     

Clinical and research issues in breast cancer genetics

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women in the U.S. The risk factors for developing breast cancer include increasing age, a family history of breast cancer, and the lack of a child by age 30. A substantial fraction of breast cancer, however, occurs in women who have no identifiable risk factors. The diagnosis, pathology, treatment, and presymptomatic testing of cancer susceptibility genes are reviewed. Syndromes with an associated risk of breast cancer are described, such as hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia, and Cowden's disease. With the localization of the BRCA1 gene to chromosome 17q21 and the BRCA2 gene to chromosome 13q12, issues surrounding breast cancer susceptibility genetic testing are assuming an ever greater measure of importance. The sensitivity and specificity for molecular testing of cancer susceptibility genes, however, have not been well defined. The progress in presymptomatic genetic testing is further hampered by various factors such as the technical difficulty in distinguishing mutations from polymorphisms, the number of different mutations identified thus far and the possibility of false positive and false negative results. Laboratory quality assurance/quality control issues are of paramount importance to avoid misleading interpretations. Many issues surrounding genetic screening and testing, such as insurance and employment discrimination, privacy, and informed consent, are under active debate, and guidelines and standards are under active development. It is therefore important to proceed with caution, so that irreversible harm resulting from data misinterpretation can be avoided.     

Hypertension and insulin resistance

Non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and obesity are defined as classical insulin resistant states. Essential hypertension is now also considered to be an insulin resistant state, even in absence of NIDDM or obesity, as shown in epidemiological, clinical and experimental studies. Neither the underlying mechanism nor a direct causality between the two phenomena has been detected as yet, but different hypotheses have been postulated where, on the one hand, insulin resistance and hypertension are considered to be causally related and, on the other hand, they are considered to be parallel phenomena due to genetic and acquired factors. The clarification of the connection between hypertension and insulin resistance seems to be of great clinical importance, since they are both independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality from cardiovascular complications. This paper gives an overview of the results of recent research on the possible underlying pathogenetic mechanisms linking hypertension and insulin resistance.     

PAI-1, obesity, insulin resistance and risk of cardiovascular events

Circulating (PAI-1) levels are elevated in patients with coronary heart disease and may play an important role in the development of atherothrombosis. Many clinical studies have indicated that the insulin resistance syndrome, which is a situation predisposing to diabetes and ischemic heart disease, may be a major regulator of PAI-1 expression, especially in determining plasma PAI-1 levels. Central obesity is a characteristic of insulin resistance and is a well recognized risk factor for coronary heart disease. Recently the production of PAI-1 by adipose tissue, in particular by tissue from omentum, has been demonstrated and could be an important contributor to the elevated plasma PAI-1 levels observed in insulin resistant patients. Besides the effect of the metabolic status on plasma PAI-1 levels, the role of a genetic control has been emphasized, but according to recent results obtained in a family segregation study, its participation seems limited. Prospective cohort studies of patients with previous myocardial infarction or angina pectoris have underlined the association between increased plasma PAI-1 levels and the risk of coronary events, but the predictive capacity of PAI-1 disappears after insulin resistance marker adjustments. Taken together these results support the notion that PAI-1 can be a link between obesity, insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease.     

Common amino acid substitutions in insulin receptor substrate-4 are not associated with Type II diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance

The family of insulin receptor substrates (IRS1-4) is defined by proteins with an overall similar structure. IRS-1 and IRS-2 have been shown to have key roles in cellular transmission of the action of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 and various cytokines. We have previously identified amino acid polymorphisms in the human IRS-1 and IRS-2 proteins. Given the documented importance of IRS-1 and -2 in insulin signalling and the implications of distribution of these genes for the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and diabetes, we decided that the most recently identified member of the IRS family, IRS-4, was a relevant candidate to examine for genetic variability which might be associated with subsets of diabetes or insulin resistance. The gene encoding IRS-4 was analysed by the single strand conformation polymorphism technique in 83 Danish Caucasians with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Five amino acid polymorphisms were identified: Leu34Phe, Arg411Gly, Gly584Cys, His879Asp and Lys883Thr. In an association study of 324 patients with Type II diabetes and 267 control subjects with normal glucose tolerance the polymorphism at codon 34 was found with allelic frequencies of 3.9 and 2.3 %, respectively, the variant at codon 411 with allelic frequencies of 3.9 and 5.6%, respectively, and the variant at codon 879 with frequencies of 19.2 and 18.0%, respectively. Each carrier of the codon 34 polymorphism was also a carrier of the codon 411 and codon 879 variants and similarly, carriers of the variant at codon 411 were also carriers of the polymorphism at codon 879. The variants at codon 584 and 883 were each found in only one Type II diabetic patient. The allelic frequencies of the variants at codon 411 and 879 were also determined in 380 young healthy subjects (4.6 and 18.1 %, respectively). The insulin sensitivity index as estimated by Bergman's minimal model of the young healthy subjects carrying either polymorphism was indistinguishable from the carriers of wild-type IRS-4. Moreover, none of the men were heterozygous for the IRS-4 polymorphisms indicating that the gene is located on the X-chromosome. In conclusion, amino acid polymorphisms in human IRS-4 are common in Caucasians but are not associated with Type II diabetes or with insulin resistance in young healthy subjects.     

Insulin dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus in advanced age

In everyday praxis diabetes mellitus diagnosed over the age of fifty years, means generally type 2 diabetes. Authors present cases where diabetes, beginning in advanced age, showed typical classical diabetic symptoms, like polyuria, polydipsia, loss of bodyweight. Apart from these signs a rapid decompensation of carbohydrate metabolism characterises this diabetes form. The most significant features are the rapid decrease of serum immunoreactive insulin and C-peptide levels, what is characteristic for the diminishing insulin secretory capacity. The patients had to be switched to insulin therapy within maximum 6 weeks. These patients can be easily differentiated both from type 2 and from the slowly progressing type 1 subtype. We suppose that the pathomechanism of this type of diabetes differs from the classical insulin-dependent form, beginning in young age.     

A new diarrhea pathogen: entero-adherent-invasive-toxigenic Escherichia coli

The number of Americans with diabetes mellitus has increased 50% since 1983 to 16 million. An interesting and startling factor is that only half of these diabetics are aware they have the disease. Diabetes mellitus can lead to blindness, heart disease, stroke, nerve damage, kidney failure, and periodontal disease. It is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. A metabolic disorder affecting insulin metabolism and associated blood glucose intolerance regulation, diabetes may be classified by the following categories: type I-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus which is commonly found in children and adolescents and type II-non-insulin-dependent or adult-onset diabetes which occurs in patients over forty and is associated with obesity. The dental hygienist's role in education, prevention, and therapeutics has expanded to detection and recognition of oral manifestations of diabetes. The dental hygienist may be the first to recognize the presence of the disease. This article aims to acquaint the dental hygienist with the clinical picture of a dental patient with diabetes mellitus.