The vibration discomfort of standing people: relative importance of fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration

Few studies have compared the discomfort caused by vibration in different directions, and few have investigated the vibration discomfort of standing people. This study was designed to compare the discomfort experienced by standing people exposed to sinusoidal vibration in the fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical directions. Using the method of magnitude estimation, 12 subjects estimated the discomfort caused by 4-Hz sinusoidal vibration at 10 different magnitudes. At 4 Hz, subjects were less sensitive to lateral vibration than to fore-and-aft vibration (K_y/K_x = 0.71), and more sensitive to vertical vibration than to horizontal vibration (K_z/K_x = 1.95; K_z/K_y = 2.77). Previous findings showing how the discomfort of standing people depends on the frequency of fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration were used to define frequency weightings that reflect relative sensitivity to vibration in each direction. The frequency weightings differ from those appropriate for seated people, and differ from the weightings for standing people in current standards that were mostly derived from understanding of the discomfort of seated people.     

Effects of horizontal whole-body vibration and standing posture on activity interference

Standing people are exposed to whole-body vibration in many environments. This paper investigates the effects of horizontal whole-body vibration and standing posture on task performance. Sixteen participants were exposed to random vibration (up to 4 Hz) whilst performing a timed pegboard task in two standing postures. Objective and subjective indicators of performance were used. Time taken to complete the task increased progressively with increases in vibration magnitude. The fore-and-aft posture generally showed greater performance decrements and postural interruptions (>1.0 ms^?2 root mean square) than the lateral. For both postures, performance was better during y-axis vibration than during x-axis vibration. Subjective ratings showed similar trends to time data. Impairments due to dual axis exposure were well predicted using root sum of squares calculations based on single axis components. These results indicate that best performance for those standing in moving environments will be achieved if individuals adopt a lateral posture with the most severe vibration in the y-axis.

Statement of Relevance: People have a need to work during transportation, either working for the transport provider or as a passenger. All modes of transport result in travellers being exposed to horizontal motion. This study demonstrates that task disturbance is affected by the orientation of the standing person to the vibration and, therefore, vehicle layouts can be optimised.     

The influence of seat backrest angle on perceived discomfort during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration

National and International Standards (e.g. BS 6841 and ISO 2631-1) provide methodologies for the measurement and assessment of whole-body vibration in terms of comfort and health. The EU Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive (PAVD) provides criteria by which vibration magnitudes can be assessed. However, these standards only consider upright seated (90°) and recumbent (0°) backrest angles, and do not provide guidance for semi-recumbent postures. This article reports an experimental programme that investigated the effects of backrest angle on comfort during vertical whole-body vibration. The series of experiments showed that a relationship exists between seat backrest angle, whole-body vibration frequency and perceived levels of discomfort. The recumbent position (0°) was the most uncomfortable and the semi-recumbent positions of 67.5° and 45° were the least uncomfortable. A new set of frequency weighting curves are proposed which use the same topology as the existing BS and ISO standards. These curves could be applied to those exposed to whole-body vibration in semi-recumbent postures to augment the existing standardised methods. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Current vibration standards provide guidance for assessing exposures for seated, standing and recumbent positions, but not for semi-recumbent postures. This article reports new experimental data systematically investigating the effect of backrest angle on discomfort experienced. It demonstrates that most discomfort is caused in a recumbent posture and that least was caused in a semi-recumbent posture.     

Predictive discomfort of non-neutral head-neck postures in fore-aft whole-body vibration

It seems obvious that human head-neck posture in whole-body vibration (WBV) contributes to discomfort and injury risk. While current mechanical measures such as transmissibility have shown good correlation with the subjective-reported discomfort, they showed difficulties in predicting discomfort for non-neutral postures. A new biomechanically based methodology is introduced in this work to predict discomfort due to non-neutral head-neck postures. Altogether, 10 seated subjects with four head-neck postures--neutral, head-up, head-down and head-to-side--were subjected to WBV in the fore-aft direction using discrete sinusoidal frequencies of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Hz and their subjective responses were recorded using the Borg CR-10 scale. All vibrations were run at constant acceleration of 0.8 m/s2 and 1.15 m/s2. The results have shown that the subjective-reported discomfort increases with head-down and decreases with head-up and head-to-side postures. The proposed predictive discomfort has closely followed the reported discomfort measures for all postures and rides under investigation. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Many occupational studies have shown strong relevance between non-neutral postures, discomfort and injury risk in WBV. With advances in computer human modelling, the proposed predictive discomfort may provide efficient ways for developing reliable biodynamic models. It may also be used to assess discomfort and modify designs inside moving vehicles.     

Objective and subjective responses of seated subjects while reading Hindi newspaper under multi axis whole-body vibration

Train passengers often read newspapers while traveling. Vibration is one of the key factors that may occasionally inhibit this activity. An experimental study was, therefore, conducted to investigate the extent of interference perceived in reading task by seated subjects in two postures under random vibration. 30 healthy male subjects were exposed to vibration magnitudes of 0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 m/s² in mono, dual and multi axis in the low frequency range 1–20 Hz. The task required subjects to read a given paragraph of Hindi national newspaper, in two seated postures (lap posture with backrest support and table posture with leaning over the table). The reading performance was evaluated by both degradation in performance in terms of time required to complete the task and subjective rating using Borg CR10 scale. Both the methods of reading performance evaluation exhibit progressive increase with an increase in vibration magnitude for both the subject postures in all the direction of vibration and are found to be higher in lateral and vertical direction among mono axes. The effects of multi axis vibration on perceived difficulty have been found to be similar to dual axes vibration and greater than mono axes vibration; however degradation in reading performance in multi axis vibration was also found to be similar to that for lateral direction. A comparison of the effect of postures by both evaluation methods revealed that the reading performance was adversely affected for table posture in all direction of vibration, however for lap posture, only the X-axis vibration effect was more severe.

Relevance to industry

Available ride comfort standards for vehicles do not include the effects of vibrations on passenger activities. Assessment of activity discomfort would be useful for vehicle design optimization to facilitate activity comfort.     

Subjective discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 2–100 Hz

Current standards assume the same frequency weightings for discomfort at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic and psychological studies show that the frequency-dependence of objective and subjective responses of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated the discomfort of seated human body caused by vertical whole-body vibration over the frequency range 2–100?Hz at relatively high magnitudes from 1.0 to 2.5?ms^?2 r.m.s. Twenty-eight subjects (15 males and 13 females) judged the discomfort using the absolute magnitude estimation method. The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing vibration magnitude was highly dependent on the frequency, so the shapes of the equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration and no single frequency weighting would be appropriate for all magnitudes. The equivalent comfort contours indicated that the standards and previous relevant studies underestimated the vibration discomfort at frequencies greater than about 30?Hz.

Practitioner Summary: The discomfort caused by vertical vibration at relatively high frequencies can be severe, particularly at relatively great magnitudes in transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort at 2–100?Hz, and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved at relatively high frequencies.     

Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support

The biodynamic response of human body seated without a back support and exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been standardized in ISO 5982 and DIN 45676 in terms of driving-point mechanical impedance and apparent mass. A comparison of ranges defined in two standards, however, reveal considerable differences in both the magnitude and phase. Greater differences are more evident for the three body mass groups, which suggests the lack of adequate reference values of biodynamic responses of seated human subjects of different body masses. In this experimental study, the biodynamic responses of seated humans within three different body mass ranges are characterized under different magnitudes of vibration and three different sitting postures in an attempt to define reference values of apparent mass for applications in mechanical-equivalent model development and anthropodynamic manikin design. Laboratory measurements were performed with adult male subjects of total body mass in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg (nine subjects for each mass group) seated with and without an inclined back support and exposed to three different magnitudes of white-noise vertical vibration (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² unweighted rms acceleration) in the frequency range between 0.5 and 20 Hz. The measured data were analyzed to derive the mean magnitude and phase responses for the three body masses, posture and excitation conditions. The mean magnitude responses of subjects within three mass groups were compared with idealized ranges defined in ISO 5982 and mean values described in DIN 45676 for no back support condition. The results revealed significant differences between the mean measured and standardized magnitudes, suggesting that the current standardized values do not describe the biodynamic responses of seated occupant of different masses even for the back not supported condition. The mean measured responses revealed most important effect of body mass, irrespective of the sitting posture. The reference values of apparent mass responses of seated body subject to vertical whole-body vibration are thus defined for three mass groups and different back support conditions that may be considered applicable for ranges of excitations considered. The responses of the body seated without a back support, also revealed notable influences of excitation magnitude, particularly on the primary peak frequencies.     

Equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft,lateral, and vertical whole-body vibration in the frequency range 1.0 to 10 Hz

Abstract

Standards assume vibration discomfort depends on the frequency and direction of whole-body vibration, with the same weightings for frequency and direction at all magnitudes. This study determined equivalent comfort contours from 1.0 to 10?Hz in each of three directions (fore-and-aft, lateral, vertical) at magnitudes in the range 0.1 to 3.5?ms^?2?r.m.s. Twenty-four subjects sat on a rigid flat seat with and without a beanbag, altering the pressure distribution on the seat but not the transmission of vibration. The rate of growth of vibration discomfort with increasing magnitude of vibration differed between the directions of vibration and varied with the frequency of vibration. The frequency-dependence and direction-dependence of discomfort, therefore, depended on the magnitude of vibration. The beanbag did not affect the frequency-dependence or direction-dependence of vibration discomfort. It is concluded that different weightings for the frequency and direction of vibration are required for low and high magnitude vibration.

Practitioner summary: When evaluating whole-body vibration to predict vibration discomfort, the weightings appropriate to different frequencies and different directions of vibration should depend on the magnitude of vibration. This is overlooked in all current methods of evaluating the severity of whole-body vibration.     

The vibration discomfort of standing people: evaluation of multi-axis vibration

Few studies have investigated discomfort caused by multi-axis vibration and none has explored methods of predicting the discomfort of standing people from simultaneous fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration of a floor. Using the method of magnitude estimation, 16 subjects estimated their discomfort caused by dual-axis and tri-axial motions (octave-bands centred on either 1 or 4 Hz with various magnitudes in the fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical directions) and the discomfort caused by single-axis motions. The method of predicting discomfort assumed in current standards (square-root of the sums of squares of the three components weighted according to their individual contributions to discomfort) provided reasonable predictions of the discomfort caused by multi-axis vibration. Improved predictions can be obtained for specific stimuli, but no single simple method will provide accurate predictions for all stimuli because the rate of growth of discomfort with increasing magnitude of vibration depends on the frequency and direction of vibration.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration

Frequency weightings for predicting vibration discomfort assume the same frequency-dependence at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic studies show that the frequency-dependence of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated how the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort depends on the acceleration and the force at the subject–seat interface. Using magnitude estimation, 20 males and 20 females judged their discomfort caused by sinusoidal vertical acceleration at 13 frequencies (1–16 Hz) at magnitudes from 0.1 to 4.0 ms^? 2 r.m.s. The frequency-dependence of their equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration, but was less dependent on the magnitude of dynamic force than the magnitude of acceleration, consistent with the biodynamic non-linearity of the body causing some of the magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours. There were significant associations between the biodynamic responses and subjective responses at all frequencies in the range 1–16 Hz.

Practitioner Summary: Vertical seat vibration causes discomfort in many forms of transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort over a range of vibration magnitudes and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved.     

Fore-and-aft and dual-axis vibration of the seated human body: Nonlinearity,cross-axis coupling,and associations between resonances in the transmissibility and apparent mass

This study examined how the apparent mass and transmissibility of the human body depend on the magnitude of fore-and-aft vibration excitation and the presence of vertical vibration. Fore-and-aft and vertical acceleration at five locations along the spine, and pitch acceleration at the pelvis, were measured in 12 seated male subjects during fore-and-aft random vibration excitation (0.25–20 Hz) at three vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s.). With the greatest magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, vertical vibration was added at 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s. Forces in the fore-and-aft and vertical directions on the seat surface were measured to calculate apparent masses. Transmissibilities and apparent masses during fore-and-aft excitation showed a principal resonance around 1 Hz and a secondary resonance around 2–3 Hz. Increasing the magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, or adding vertical excitation, decreased the magnitudes of the resonances. At the primary resonance frequency, the dominant mode induced by fore-and-aft excitation involved bending of the lumbar spine and the lower thoracic spine with shear deformation of tissues at the ischial tuberosities. The relative contributions to this mode from each body segment (especially the pelvis and the lower thoracic spine) varied with vibration magnitude. The nonlinearities in the apparent mass and transmissibility during dual-axis excitation indicate coupling between the principal mode of the seated human body excited by fore-and-aft excitation and the cross-axis influence of vertical excitation.Relevance to industryUnderstanding movements of the body during exposure to whole-body vibration can assist the optimisation of seating dynamics and help to control the effects of the vibration on human comfort, performance, and health. This study suggests cross-axis nonlinearity in biodynamic responses to vibration should be considered when optimising vibration environments.     

The relative discomfort of noise and vibration: effects of stimulus duration

How noise discomfort and vibration discomfort depend on duration has not previously been compared. For five durations (2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 s), the subjective equivalence of noise and vibration was investigated with all 49 combinations of 7 levels of noise and 7 magnitudes of whole-body vertical vibration. The rates of increase in discomfort with increasing duration were similar for noise and vibration, whereas they are currently assumed to be 3 dB per doubling of noise duration and 1.5 dB per doubling of vibration duration. The discomfort caused by low levels of noise was masked by high magnitudes of vibration, and the discomfort caused by low magnitudes of vibration was masked by high levels of noise. As stimuli durations increased from 2 to 32 s, the influence of vibration on the judgement of noise discomfort decreased, whereas the influence of noise on the judgement of vibration discomfort was unchanged.     

The vibration discomfort of standing persons: evaluation of random and transient motions

The discomfort of standing people experiencing steady-state vibration can be predicted from the root-mean-square (rms) of the frequency-weighted acceleration, but alternative methods are advocated for evaluating motions containing transients. Using the method of magnitude estimation, 20 standing subjects estimated the discomfort caused by octave-bandwidth random vibrations at two centre frequencies (1 and 8 Hz) in each of three directions (fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical). For motions having seven different crest factors (i.e. the ratio of the peak to the rms value), the vibration magnitude required for similar discomfort, and a method predicting this equivalence, were determined. The rms method (with an exponent of 2) and the root-mean-quad method (exponent of 4) tended to, respectively, underestimate and overestimate the discomfort of high-crest factor motions. The optimum evaluation method had an exponent of about 3.0 for 1-Hz motions and 3.5 for 8-Hz motions. Current standards do not provide reliable indications of when vibration discomfort can be predicted by an rms measure.

Statement of Relevance: Current standards recommend alternatives to the root-mean-square method (exponent of 2.0) for predicting the discomfort caused by transient vibration. The alternatives include the root-mean-quad or vibration dose value (exponent of 4.0) and peak values. An exponent of 2.0 underestimates, but an exponent of 4.0 slightly overestimates, the discomfort of transients experienced by standing people. Peak values are not appropriate.     

Subjective response to whole-body vibration The effects of posture

In an investigation of the effects of posture on subjective responses to whole-body vibration, 20 undergraduate subjects produced equal sensation contours adopting three postures each on different occasions. The postures adopted were standing, sitting upright and sitting slouched.

The results indicated significant differences in the contour shapes from the three postures, and the level set in the sitting postures were significantly lower than in the standing posture. No difference was obtained between the two sitting postures.

Implications of these findings are discussed regarding the role of transmissibility in subjective response to vibration, and the necessity to produce different standards for different postures.     

Effects of work surface height on muscle activity and posture of the upper extremity during simulated pipetting

In order to examine the effects of work surface height (WSH) on muscle activity, posture and discomfort during simulated pipetting, an experimental study was conducted using electromyography, electrogoniometry, video techniques and also qualitative data. The experimental design consisted of one independent variable (WSH with six heights) and 13 dependent variables. The levels of muscle strain and discomfort were significantly lower at the shoulder when the WSHs were low but thumb muscle activities and neck flexion levels were markedly higher at these WSHs compared to higher WSHs. To reduce shoulder strain, without raising thumb and neck strain beyond acceptable limits, the findings suggest that the height of a laboratory workbench should be at the level of the pipette tip when held in a standing position with the hand at elbow height. It was also found that pipetting should not be done in a seated posture.

Practitioner Summary: An experimental study was conducted to examine the effects of work surface height on upper extremity muscle activity, posture and discomfort during simulated pipetting. The findings suggest that the laboratory workbench height should be at the pipette-tip level when held in a standing position with the hand at elbow height.     

The vibration of inclined backrests: perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back in the z-axis of the body

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency of vibration influence the perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back (vertical vibration when sitting upright, horizontal vibration when recumbent). Subjects experienced backrest vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5 to 25 Hz at vibration magnitudes up to 24 dB above threshold. Absolute thresholds, equivalent comfort contours, and the principal locations for feeling vibration were determined with four backrest inclinations: 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90° (recumbent). With all backrest inclinations, acceleration thresholds and equivalent comfort contours were similar and increased with increasing frequency at 6 dB per octave (i.e. velocity constant). It is concluded that backrest inclination has little effect on the frequency dependence of thresholds and equivalent comfort contours for vibration applied along the back, and that the W _d frequency weighting in current standards is appropriate for evaluating z-axis vibration of the back at all backrest inclinations.

Statement of Relevance: To minimise the vibration discomfort of seated people, it is necessary to understand how discomfort varies with backrest inclination. It is concluded that the vibration on backrests can be measured using a pad between the backrest and the back, so that it reclines with the backrest, and the measured vibration evaluated without correcting for the backrest inclination.     

Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective workload during whole-body vibration exposure while seated in upright and twisted postures with and without armrests

There is little knowledge on performance during vibration exposure combined with occupational hazards such as bent or twisted postures. In addition, little information is available on the effective use of armrests during performance-related tasks. This paper investigates the influence of sitting in different working postures on the reaction time and perceived workload of subjects exposed to whole-body vibration. Twenty-one subjects were exposed to 1–20 Hz random vibration in the vertical and fore-and-aft directions. A choice reaction time task was completed while seated in four posture conditions: upright or twisted, with and without armrests. Following the task, participants completed the NASA TLX workload assessment. Posture combined with whole-body vibration exposure had a significant influence on the ability to perform the task. The combined environmental stressors significantly degraded the performance; not only did their reaction times become compromised, the participants’ workload demand also increased. The most severe decrement in performance and workload was experienced while seated in a twisted posture with no armrest support. The inclusion of armrests significantly improved the participants’ ability to complete the task with a lower workload demand.

Relevance to industry

Twisted postures have been observed in a variety of machine operations and it is important to determine their influence on operator workload. Many off-road machines have suspension seats fitted with armrests; this paper demonstrates that armrest support provides additional benefits for off-road machine operators under combined environmental stressors.     

(Abstracts)Changing Industrial Demands

Abstract

The frequency dependence of discomfort caused by vertical mechanical shocks has been investigated with 20 seated males exposed to upward and downward shocks at 13 fundamental frequencies (1–16 Hz) and 18 magnitudes (±0.12 to ±8.3 ms^?2). The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing shock magnitude depended on the fundamental frequency of the shocks, so the frequency dependence of equivalent comfort contours (for both vertical acceleration and vertical force measured at the seat) varied with shock magnitude. The rate of growth of discomfort was similar for acceleration and force, upward and downward shocks, and lower and higher magnitude shocks. The frequency dependence of discomfort from shocks differs from that of sinusoidal vibrations having the same fundamental frequencies. This arises in part from the frequency content of the shock. Frequency weighting W_b in BS 6841:1987 and ISO 2631-1:1997 provided reasonable estimates of the discomfort caused by the shocks investigated in this study.

Practitioner Summary: No single frequency weighting can accurately predict the discomfort caused by mechanical shocks over wide ranges of shock magnitude, but vibration dose values with frequency weighting W_b provide reasonable estimates of discomfort caused by shocks similar to those investigated in this study with peak accelerations well below 1 g.     

The Evaluation of Discomfort Produced by Multiple Frequency Whole-Body Vibration

Abstract

The discomfort produced by multiple frequency whole-body vertical vibration has been studied in three expriments. Subjects were required to adjust the level of a 10 Hz sinusoidal vibration such that it produced a degree of discomfort equivalent to that caused by a variety of multiple frequency stimuli including motions containing predominant beats and up to four sinusoidal components. The levels of the 10 Hz vibration equivalent to the complex motions were always well predicted by the root mean square of the levels of 10 Hz equivalent to the individual sinusoidal components in the complex motion. Tho equivalent discomfort of the multiple frequency motions could therefore be determined by weighting the vibration spectrum with an electronic network having a frequency response given by the manner in which discomfort due to vibration varies with vibration frequency. The possibility of inhibition occurring in the response to multiple frequency motions was investigated and it was concluded that tho complexity inherent in methods based on models of inhibition was unnecessary. The present findings have been compared with the procedures for assessing multiple frequency motions given in the current International Standard on the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration.     

Study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration

The influence of whole-body vertical vibration on the dynamic human–seat interface pressure is investigated using a flexible grid of pressure sensors. The ischium pressure and the overall pressure distribution at the human–seat interface are evaluated as functions of the magnitude and frequency of vibration excitation, and seated posture and height. The dynamic pressure at the seat surface is measured under sinusoidal vertical vibration of different magnitudes in the 1–10 Hz frequency range. Two methods based on ischium pressure and ischium force are proposed to study the influence of seat height, posture and characteristics of vibration. The results of the study reveal that the amplitude of dynamic pressure component increases with an increase in the excitation amplitude in almost entire frequency range considered in this study. The dynamic components of both the ischium pressure and the ischium force reveal peaks in the 4 to 5 Hz frequency band, the range of primary resonant frequency of the seated human body in the vertical mode. The mean values of the dynamic ischium pressure and the ischium force remain constant, irrespective of the excitation frequency and amplitude. The magnitudes of mean pressure and force at the human–seat interface, however, are dependent upon the seat height and the subject's posture. The inter-subject variability of the static ischium pressure and effective contact area are presented as functions of the subject weight and subject weight-to-height ratio. It was found that heavy subjects tend to induce low ischium pressure as a result of increased effective contact area.

Relevance to industry

Pressure distribution at the human–seat interface has been found to be an important factor affecting the seating comfort and work efficiency of various workers. The study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vibration is specifically critical to the comfort, work efficiency and health of vehicle drivers, who are regularly exposed to vibration. The results reported in this paper will be useful to study dynamic response of the interface pressure and design vehicle seats.