Training for the future of psychology practice.

This article responds to the Eby et al. (this issue, pp. 57–68) paper on issues and dilemmas for the future of training for psychology practice. The author addresses these issues and discusses them in regards to our identity as psychologists and changes in training needed in light of the recent passage of federal health care reform legislation. The changes in health care include the importance of training to work in integrated health care systems, primary care, using electronic health records, and dealing with health disparities. Training recommendations from the 2009 APA Presidential Task Force on the Future of Psychology Practice are presented. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

La psychologie et la santé.

This article traces the historical development of Canadian medicare and its significant influence on shaping not only the clinical services provided within Canada's public health care system but also its major impact on the nation's overall health research agenda. Particular emphasis is placed on how this has influenced the development and role of psychology in the public health care system. It is argued that all psychologists, whether their work is focused on the applied or experimental areas of the discipline, have much to offer Canadians across the entire health care spectrum. Nevertheless, psychological services in the public health care system, and particularly in hospitals, have mainly developed within and continue to be primarily focused around mental health. Services in nonmental health areas of health have been more limited, although their importance is well recognized. The current situation partly reflects the limited training in general health issues that clinical psychologists-in-training generally receive in many graduate school programs in Canada. However, it also reflects the overall influence of medicare on the development of Canada's health care system. Medicare has tended to focus the activities of Canada's health care system primarily on treating illness rather than on preventing it and/or maintaining health. Also, medicare has oriented Canada's health care system mainly toward delivering medical services rather than providing more comprehensive health services (e.g., the "medically necessary" criterion for funding). However, times are changing. The growing emphasis among health policymakers in Canada on illness prevention and health promotion (e.g., the creation of the federal government Public Health Agency of Canada in 2004) will significantly expand psychology's role across all areas of health. Psychology education and training programs are urged to seriously examine whether psychology practitioners and researchers are being adequately prepared at present for the much broader array of future interdisciplinary professional, research, and educational activities and responsibilities that will emerge. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology and health.

This article traces the historical development of Canadian medicare and its significant influence on shaping not only the clinical services provided within Canada's public health care system but also its major impact on the nation's overall health research agenda. Particular emphasis is placed on how this has influenced the development and role of psychology in the public health care system. It is argued that all psychologists, whether their work is focused on the applied or experimental areas of the discipline, have much to offer Canadians across the entire health care spectrum. Nevertheless, psychological services in the public health care system, and particularly in hospitals, have mainly developed within and continue to be primarily focused around mental health. Services in nonmental health areas of health have been more limited, although their importance is well recognized. The current situation partly reflects the limited training in general health issues that clinical psychologists-in-training generally receive in many graduate school programs in Canada. However, it also reflects the overall influence of medicare on the development of Canada's health care system. Medicare has tended to focus the activities of Canada's health care system primarily on treating illness rather than on preventing it and/or maintaining health. Also, medicare has oriented Canada's health care system mainly toward delivering medical services rather than providing more comprehensive health services (e.g., the "medically necessary" criterion for funding). However, times are changing. The growing emphasis among health policymakers in Canada on illness prevention and health promotion (e.g., the creation of the federal government Public Health Agency of Canada in 2004) will significantly expand psychology's role across all areas of health. Psychology education and training programs are urged to seriously examine whether psychology practitioners and researchers are being adequately prepared at present for the much broader array of future interdisciplinary professional, research, and educational activities and responsibilities that will emerge. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychological consultation with primary care physicians: Obstacles and opportunities in the medical setting.

This article discusses the relationship between psychologists and primary care physicians and describes the training and practice of physicians in the areas of mental and behavioral health care. Issues affecting the relationship between psychologists and primary care physicians are then reviewed. Different models of psychological consultation are discussed, and an integrated behavioral systems model of psychological consultation is presented as a potentially effective model for consultation with primary care physicians. This model provides a framework for psychologists to function as coproviders of primary health care services. Practical strategies to enhance collaboration between psychologists and primary care physicians in private practice are discussed. The need for more research on primary care and for the inclusion of psychologists in managed care and health care reform are also highlighted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The changing workforce: The role of health psychology.

Because the federal government is the largest payer of all health costs, unbridled increases in the health workforce have profound fiscal implications. Recent efforts to control health spending through modifications of health delivery systems are related to the consequences of the unlimited production of health professionals. However, the federal government has established processes to review physician workforce changes, and these mechanisms have become important in accessing federal training monies. Psychologists have no concerted workforce policy and receive little federal training money. Moreover, other health professionals have attained statutory authority to perform and provide the same services as psychologists. This diffusion of professional functions impedes the ability to assess the status of the workforce and the development of psychology as a health profession. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Divided No More: Psychology's Role in Integrated Health Care.

Health-care providers increasingly recognize the need to address behavioural and emotional influences on physical health in order to provide quality and cost-effective services. As behaviour change experts, psychologists can be critically important in new models of integrated care that focus on both physical and psychological health. However, to be effective, psychologists must be prepared to address the major issues facing health-care systems today and be willing to re-examine and modify current modes of education and practice. This article describes important trends affecting health care and the ways in which psychologists could contribute. Lastly, two psychologists involved in new models of integrated care describe their training and the challenges and rewards of their current activities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Investing in our future: Unrealized opportunities for funding graduate psychology training.

Purpose: Changes in the health care environment have brought challenges and opportunities to the field of psychology. Practitioners have been successful in modifying service models to absorb losses of financial support for behavioral health care, due to managed care and public policy changes, while simultaneously managing the growing need for these services. However, in this reactive mode of responding to evolutions in the health care system, the field of psychology has at times lost sight of the long-term vision required to promote psychology's inclusion in the health care system of the future. In particular, a focus on training psychologists and ensuring the availability of funding to support these activities must be a priority in planning for the future. This article provides an overview of federal programs that currently offer funding for psychology training, as well as other opportunities for federal funding that have been unrealized. Details regarding advocacy efforts that were required to secure available sources of funding are given, followed by consideration of strategies for taking advantage of existing resources and prioritizing advocacy for additional funding. Conclusion: Funding for psychology training provides an avenue for increasing the number of well-trained psychologists who can serve patients' mental and behavioral health needs and thereby improve health outcomes. Moreover, capitalizing on available funding opportunities for psychology training and promoting efforts to expand these opportunities will help ensure that the field of psychology is positioned to remain an important contributor to the health care system of the future. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Children's mental health problems and services: Current federal efforts and policy implications.

This article discusses the current federal role in the collection of information about the mental health problems of children and the provision of mental health services to children. It also describes the federal programs that help finance mental health services, support their coordination, and provide funding for research and training of mental health researchers and clinicians. Recent changes in federal policy are also described. This article, and the Office of Technology Assessment report on which it is based, conclude that although it is in some ways considerable, the federal role in providing mental health services to children is fragmented. This lack of cohesive policies toward children and across service programs may create difficulties for those who would move public policy toward the continuum of care that many observers conclude is needed to address children's mental health needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Acquiring CMS funding for an APA-accredited postdoctoral psychology fellowship program.

In 2001 Congress reinterpreted existing legislation allowing hospital based, postdoctoral psychology training programs that were accredited by the American Psychological Association (APA) to file for and receive allied health reimbursement through the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS). This became effective on March 13, 2001 (Health Care Financing Administration, 2001). Historically physician and other allied health training programs have received government funding, while psychology training has been nonfunded. This new legislation symbolized a shift in federal health policy and recognized psychology as a valuable discipline within the health care system. This article discusses several postdoctoral programs' successful approach in obtaining CMS funding and encourages other eligible programs to pursue it as well. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Roles of the federal and state governments in outcomes assessment

Both federal and state governments have mandates to collect, analyze, and disseminate health care information. The federal government is the single largest payer for health care and health services research. Its agencies, the Healthcare Finance Administration (HCFA) and the Agency for Healthcare Policy Research (AHCPR) play a major role in shaping information strategies for all health care stakeholders. State governments are among those stakeholders and are fertile grounds for experimentation, change, and learning. Building effective federal-state partnerships and public-private partnerships can help foster innovation in health data collection and analysis, as well as identify new strategies for information dissemination.     

Psychology and health care.

Recent advances in health care psychology are noted, especially those involving the conceptualization and treatment of lifestyle and chronic health problems. The contributions to health care psychology of community psychology, brief psychological treatments, behavioral medicine, and health psychology are outlined. The central task of both organized psychology and individual psychologists is to create an underlying structure of clear boundaries and standards for clinical practice and training in health care psychology. Initially, this task should involve an inventory of Canadian psychologists currently providing health care services and the nature and amount of those services. Subsequently, a need exists for the profession to examine and create guidelines in psychological service delivery, professional role models, training, and scientific methods pertaining to general health care. (French abstract) (27 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

A perspective on the nation's antitrust policies: Implications for psychologists.

In response to significant change in the health care market, federal antitrust agencies recently examined their past policies and future directions for antitrust law enforcement in the health care industry. This article reviews how the federal antitrust laws have been used to both aid and restrict the practice of psychology, psychologists' dealings with managed care, and the limits of antitrust law enforcement efforts. Finally, we argue that narrowly crafted antitrust reform would provide practicing psychologists and other health professionals with some degree of countervailing bargaining power in their negotiations with managed care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Physician domination in the health care industry: The pursuit of antitrust redress.

Argues that the exclusion of qualified practitioners from the medical staffs of hospitals and the exclusion of psychological services from federal and commercial health care programs threaten the independent and autonomous practice of psychology in any national health insurance program. If psychological services are to be made available to consumers through such a program, psychologists must act now to preserve their status as independent professionals. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Federal involvement in mental health care for the aged: Past and future directions.

Reviews federal legislative trends in mental health services for the elderly under the Reagan administration. The consolidation of 21 health programs into 4 block grants is considered for its impact on elderly mental health care, and Congress's support of important programs such as clinical training, social research, and research on Alzheimer's disease is discussed. Severe limitations for reimbursement of mental health care under Medicare are considered. It is concluded that Community Mental Health Centers under the Reagan administration will further limit non-revenue-producing services such as prevention, consultation, and education as they exhaust their 8-yr federal funding support, and it is unlikely that Medicaid will increase its coverage of services for the mentally ill. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Primary Care Psychology Training on Campus: Collaboration Within a Student Health Center.

Applied psychological services are being implemented into the primary care treatment milieu to improve patient treatment and reduce health care costs. Unfortunately, few psychologists have training specifically oriented to working in this setting. A predoctoral training program wherein psychology graduate students may obtain practicum experience working in a student health center on a university campus is described. The theoretical underpinnings of this training are based on the integrated primary care models of K. Strosahl (1997) and K. Strosahl, N. Baker, M. Braddick, M. Stuart, and M. Handley (1997), which emphasize integration of psychological and medical treatment, brief intervention, consultation, and expedited referral for longer term cases. Though many issues remain, integrated primary care offers promise for improved health care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology and HMOs: New partnership or new adversary?

Discusses the provision of psychological services in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) with regard to the level of the legal recognition of the autonomous functioning of psychologists. Professional concerns over the role of psychologists in HMOs and over incentives to provide quality mental health care in such organizations are also discussed. The need is stressed for psychologists to be recognized as autonomous providers under the basic federal health programs. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychological Treatments.

Psychology has recently identified itself as a health care profession and codified this change in the bylaws of the American Psychological Association. Although psychologists make a number of contributions to the nation's health-and mental health-the most identifiable activity focuses on treating physical or psychological pathology with psychological interventions. Recently, health care policymakers have established that evidence supporting the efficacy of these interventions is more than sufficient for their inclusion in health care systems around the world. To promote faster and more widespread dissemination of these interventions specifically targeting problems severe enough to be included in health care systems and to solidify the identification of psychology as a health care profession, perhaps it is time for a change in terminology. It is proposed that psychologists label these procedures psychological treatments so as to differentiate them from more generic psychotherapy, which is often used outside of the scope of health care systems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Review of Madness and government: Who cares for the mentally ill?.

Reviews the book, Madness and government: Who cares for the mentally ill? by Emory A. Foley and Steven S. Sharfstein (1983). This book is a fascinating factual account of the struggle to develop community intervention alternatives to the 100-year domination of the state hospital system in the United States. It is the story of the efforts of "Washington's Noble Conspirators," who struggled for more than 20 years after World War II to expand the amount of federal support of medical research, to get federal money into the care of people with mental disorders, and to obtain federal support for the training of mental health personnel and research into the whole area of mental health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology's response to the graying of America.

Asserts that changes set in motion by major public health advances early in the century have increased the demand for knowledge about the aging process, especially the psychological aspects of aging. There is need for basic and applied research on aging in areas such as memory; federal support should be provided for training at the predoctoral level; and information on the psychological aspects of aging should be transmitted to society, policy makers, and members of other professions who serve the elderly. Knowledge of aging as a biological, psychological, and social process is applicable in fields such as industry, education, and engineering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Psychology and primary health care for children.

There is an emerging consensus among those responsible for primary health care to children that such care should not only include medical concerns but also should assist parents with common problems of development and behavior. Psychologists are increasingly included among the personnel of medical groups that provide primary care to children. A model for this relatively new type of practice is described. Such pediatric primary-care settings also offer new research opportunities for psychologists. An important public policy issue concerns how comprehensive primary health care, including psychological services, can be made accessible to all children, and how research to evaluate such services and improve their efficacy can be encouraged. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)