An ipsilateral superdrainaged transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction

A conventional single pedicled TRAM (transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous) flap is a musculocutaneous flap widely used for breast reconstruction. However, complications such as partial flap necrosis, fat necrosis, and fatty induration may occur as a result of unstable blood flow circulation to the flap. One major factor is venous congestion in the flap. In an effort to obtain more stable TRAM flap blood circulation, we anastomosed the ipsilateral deep inferior epigastric vein of a pedicled TRAM flap to the thoracodorsal vein. This procedure provides superdrainage by means of enhanced venous perfusion. This flap with superdrainage augmentation is referred to as a superdrainaged TRAM flap (12 patients). Changes in cutaneous blood flow were also assessed by measurement of cutaneous blood flow in zone IV using a laser blood flow meter (8 patients). The patients who underwent breast reconstructive surgery using this technique showed no evidence of postoperative complications such as flap necrosis, fat necrosis, or fatty induration. Satisfactory results were obtained during breast reconstruction in patients who had previously undergone a radical mastectomy with resultant large areas of tissue defects. In addition, the two patient groups, 12 patients with superdrainaged TRAM flap and 20 patients with single pedicled TRAM flap, were compared to assess differences in complications. The incidence of partial flap necrosis, fat necrosis, and fatty induration was lower among patients with superdrainaged flap than those with single pedicled flap.     

Clamp subunit dissociation dictates bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme disassembly

A large series of women who had undergone bilateral, pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions were compared with women who had had unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap procedures to determine whether a bilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction had significant additional morbidity. The records of all women who underwent either a bilateral or unilateral pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction through the Emory Clinic from 1987 to 1994 (n = 257) were retrospectively analyzed with respect to general, breast (fat necrosis, flap loss, and cellulitis), and abdominal (hernia, skin loss, and cellulitis) complications. By using logistic regression, risk factors for these complications were determined. The incidence of fat necrosis and partial flap loss was not significantly different among bilateral patients compared with patients with unilateral TRAM reconstructions (10.0 percent versus 12.6 percent, p = 0.64 and 3.8 percent versus 5.5 percent, p = 0.74, respectively). The rate of hernia formation in the bilateral TRAM flap patients (5.4 percent) was similar to that of unilateral patients (3.9 percent, p = 0.80). Significant factors for any complication in both patient populations included obesity, smoking, and prior irradiation. The type of breast reconstruction was not a significant factor for any breast or donor-site complication. A bilateral TRAM reconstruction showed a weak association with general complications. Review of the Emory Clinic experience with unilateral and bilateral pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions from 1987 to 1994 was able to detect no significant additional rate of complications for bilateral pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions compared with unilateral unipedicled TRAM flap procedures.     

Immediate, bilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after mastectomy

Although breast reconstruction has been shown to provide psychological benefits in mastectomy patients, there is reluctance to perform immediate, bilateral TRAM flap reconstruction because of concerns regarding magnitude of the procedure, length of hospitalization, potential complications, and long-term recovery. Between June, 1990 and March 1992, 15 patients underwent immediate, bilateral TRAM flap reconstruction following bilateral mastectomy at the University of Michigan Hospitals. Diagnoses included lobular carcinoma in situ (nine patients), strong family history of breast cancer (five), or bilateral breast cancer (one). Invasive breast cancer was present in three patients. Three modified radical mastectomies and 27 simple mastectomies were performed. Bilateral pedicle TRAM flap reconstruction was carried out at the same time in all patients (30 flaps total). Marginal loss occurred in one flap (3%). Additional complications included marginal necrosis of the abdominal donor site wound (one), wound infection (two), and abdominal donor site hernia (one). Median hospital stay was 7 days. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 4-25 months). All patients have resumed their accustomed pre-operative activity patterns. These findings demonstrate that immediate, bilateral TRAM flap reconstruction is a safe and effective option for breast reconstruction after mastectomy.     

Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps]

The free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is vascularized by the inferior epigastric pedicle. There are many techniques according to the indication. We describe the technique for breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. The rectus muscle is taken between the umbilicus and the arcuate line. The skin paddle, was taken transversely like an abdominoplasty. The incision extends from 1 cm above the umbilicus to include the perforators around it. The mean length of the vascular epigastric pedicle is 6 cm. This study was performed from one hundred dissections.     

The internal burden of lead among children in a smelter town--a small area analysis

Many women who have undergone or will undergo mastectomy request breast reconstruction and feel that it is an important part of their total cancer treatment. Autogenous tissue methods take a place more and more important in breast reconstruction. The autologous latissimus dorsi flap, is a recent method of autologous breast reconstruction. We have done a retrospective study based on a series of 60 consecutive reconstructions operated between march 1993 and april 1995. The advantages of the autologous latissimus dorsi flap are the same of the others autologous breast reconstruction methods: the reconstructed breasts are soft and match an opposite normal breast more successfully than those made with implants. The disadvantages of this technique is mainly the dorsal seroma that was observed in 70% of cases but was easily managed by aspirations. The aesthetics results have been judged by two surgeons as very good in 85% of cases, good in 11.6% and low in 3.3%. The satisfaction rate of the patients in high: 86.6% are pleased and 13.3% are satisfied. The autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction is a safe and reliable technique and provides an excellent alternative to the TRAM flap, when the patient prefer the dorsal donor site or when there are some risk factors to do a TRAM flap. Finally this technique bring a major advance in the field of breast reconstruction, immediate or delayed.     

Relationship between imaging and pathological features and clinical factors in surgical cases of temporal lobe epilepsy]

The advantages of the free TRAM flap over the conventional Tram flap are known. The use of its main pedicle--the deep inferior epigastric system--improves the blood supply, decreasing the risk of skin and fat necrosis. The harvesting of 5-7 cm of muscle, and the preservation of its lateral border decreases the risk of abdominal wall bulge or hernias. Delayed breast reconstructions in patients submitted to radiotherapy were performed by end to side anastomosis between flap vessels and axillary vessels, avoiding the thoracodorsal irradiated vessels, and improving the blood flow. Ten patients were submitted to breast reconstruction by free TRAM flaps. There was one total flap necrosis, and one delayed healing around the periumbilical suture. Neither skin nor fat necrosis were seen. One patient developed an abdominal wall bulge. Two patients presenting tumor metastasis abandoned the plastic surgery outpatient clinic. Two patients refused the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction. The outcome of five NAC reconstructions was very good, breasts being symmetrical without an opposite breast operation.     

Short- and long-term treatment with indometacin causes renal phospholipid alteration: a possible explanation for indomethacin nephrotoxicity

The authors report their experience of the use of a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in reparative surgery after total or partial mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. The series, including 101 cases, was separated into four groups on the basis of the context: I--thoracic radionecrosis (5 cases); II--chest wall cover (24 cases); III--immediate breast reconstruction (57 cases); deferred breast reconstruction (15 cases). The well-known vascular reliability of this pediculated flap was confirmed here by the low incidence of necrosis (3%), always marginal. Other complications were not attributable to the flap itself but to concomitant radiodystrophic skin lesions and the presence of the prosthetic implant in the case of breast reconstruction.     

Immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction in an obese patient with relapsing benign phyllodes tumor: report of a case

The authors present a case of relapsing benign phyllodes cystosarcoma of the breast in an obese female treated with a simple mastectomy and an immediate reconstruction using a bipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. After a brief review of treatment options for phyllodes tumors, they discuss the advantages of TRAM flap breast reconstruction, suggesting that it may also be applied in obese patients.     

Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM

Free TRAM flap transfer is now routinely offered to patients requiring breast reconstruction. This study compares results of conventional superior-pedicled TRAM flaps and free TRAM flaps in bilateral breast reconstructions. A total of 92 breasts were reconstructed in 46 patients. Eighteen patients had free TRAM flap reconstructions, and 28 patients were reconstructed with conventional TRAM flaps. Comparison of average operative blood loss and average operative time for the two techniques showed blood loss of 575 cc and an operative time of 9.6 hours for the free TRAM reconstructions and a blood loss of 313 cc and an operative time of 6.6 hours for the conventional TRAM reconstructions. For free TRAM flap reconstructions, both blood loss and operative time decreased significantly between the first and second group of nine patients: from 819 to 360 cc of blood loss and from 10.5 to 8.9 hours of operative time. Partial flap loss (skin and fat necrosis) and fat necrosis only occurred in 13 and 7 percent, respectively, of conventional TRAM flaps, but neither occurred in free TRAM flaps. However, early in the series, three free flaps were lost in two patients, requiring implant placement. Bilateral breast reconstruction using the free TRAM flap may offer a lower complication rate than the conventional TRAM flap by virtue of improved blood supply and less abdominal wall disruption. Surgeons, however, are forewarned that this procedure has a steep learning curve, and surgeons lacking microsurgical expertise may be better served by the conventional TRAM flap.     

Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients

This article presents our technique of autologous breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi flap and studies the advantages, disadvantages, and results that can be expected. A consecutive sample of 100 patients was studied. The average length of follow-up was 20 months (range 8 to 44 months), and all of the subjects were reviewed in consultation without loss to follow-up. The supplementary volume of the latissimus dorsi was obtained from five fatty zones: fat on the cutaneous paddle, fat taken from the surface of the muscle, the scapular fat pad, the anterior fatty zone, and the supra-iliac fat pad. This technique must be measured against the transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap, free or pedicled, when the patient needs an autologous breast reconstruction. It can be used when the TRAM flap is contraindicated (this corresponds to 45 percent of patients of our sample) or when the dorsal donor site is preferred (55 percent of cases of our sample). The major complications are rare (1 percent partial necrosis and 1 percent total necrosis of the flap). The minor complications are represented mainly by the dorsal seroma. This is the main drawback of the technique, as it occurs in 79 percent of cases and regularly in obese patients. In view of this frequency, patients should be warned of its likely occurrence. The dorsal donor-site morbidity is relatively low; 4 percent of dorsal sequelae were classed as moderate, and 96 percent were considered low. The scapular sequelae have been classed as low in 97 percent of cases, and temporary scapular sequelae aggravation has been noted in 3 percent. Results of breast reconstruction using this technique are most encouraging. The level of patient satisfaction is high; 87 percent of them were deeply satisfied, 10 percent were satisfied, and only 3 percent were poorly satisfied. This group of poorly satisfied subjects (3 percent) consists of patients who suffered a serious postoperative complication. The aesthetic results have been judged excellent by surgeons in 85 percent of the cases, good in 12 percent of the cases, and poor in 3 percent of the cases; no result has been judged bad. This technique of breast reconstruction by autologous latissimus dorsi brings a major advance in breast reconstruction. The best indications of this technique are when one can bury the cutaneous paddle: cases of skin-sparing mastectomy, cases where the latissimus dorsi flap can be combined with an abdominal advancement flap, and cases of conversion of implant reconstruction to an autologous reconstruction.     

Dermal autografts for fascial repair after TRAM flap harvest

To find an alternative to synthetic mesh closure of abdominal fascial defects after transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap harvest, dermal autografts were removed from tissue to be discarded and used for fascial closure. Dermal grafts have been used for herniorrhaphy and fascial repair after TRAM harvest previously, but have never been systematically studied. The dermal autograft technique was used in 24 patients to repair or reinforce anterior rectus sheath or external oblique fascia after TRAM harvest for breast reconstruction. During the same period, 25 other patients underwent TRAM breast reconstruction with abdominal wall closure by other methods. All patients were followed by serial physical examinations given by the operating surgeon. Average follow-up in the dermal autograft group was 12.6 versus 12.0 months in the second group. In the dermal autograft group, two patients complained of bulging of the anterior abdominal wall; one developed a true hernia, away from the location of the dermal autograft. In the second group, two patients experienced bulging. Wounds and infectious complications were similar in both groups. Dermal autografts are a useful alternative to mesh repair or direct closure of fascial defects after TRAM flap harvest.     

Fate of the TRAM flap after abdominoplasty in a rat model

During a classical abdominoplasty, all musculocutaneous perforators from the deep inferior epigastric vessels are normally divided. Even if somehow neovascularization could relink the abdominal skin and rectus abdominis muscles, reestablishing these same discrete perforators would be unlikely because of the barrier effect of the abdominal wall fascia. Therefore, a lower transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap intuitively should not regain sufficient vascularity for viability after a prior abdominoplasty, and a history of the latter should be expected to be a major contraindication for this procedure. Nevertheless, anecdotal observations of successful lower TRAM flaps following abdominoplasty seem to contradict our basic principles, which may need better further elucidation. Consequently, this two-stage study in Sprague-Dawley rats was undertaken, initially performing an abdominoplasty in all rats. This was followed 1 or 10 months later by the creation of an unipedicled superiorly based TRAM flap that incorporated virtually all of the abdominal skin. From our identical historical TRAM flap control (n = 5) except without prior abdominoplasty, 72.8 +/- 12.83 percent of this area survived. TRAM flaps raised 1 month after the abdominoplasty (n = 6) had 2.2 +/- 3.4 percent or essentially no viability. Unexpectedly, the long-term group (n = 7) demonstrated 13.7 +/- 10.0 percent viability, ranging from 0 to 30 percent. Both groups of TRAM flaps after abdominoplasty had a flap survival area significantly less than that of the control by two-tailed group t test (p < 0.001), and that of the long-term group area was significantly greater than that of the short-term (p = 0.022). Lead oxide studies 10 months after abdominoplasty revealed no irrefutable evidence of the reestablishment of rectus abdominis perforators to the integument, although obviously some reconnections had formed at the microcirculatory level to partially revascularize some flaps. The range of viability of the long-term rat TRAM flaps documented that for the majority, surviving surface area was minuscule even following a delay equivalent to a human decade after abdominoplasty (1 rat month - 1.1 human years), yet rarely sufficient revascularization did indeed occur, which could explain the prior unusual clinical successes. However, the basic principle that a TRAM flap raised following a classical abdominoplasty at any time would be a risky maneuver seems to still be a valid concept.     

The mastectomy specimen as a model for TRAM flap fabrication in immediate breast reconstruction

Traditionally, most of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap shaping takes place after transfer of the flap to the chest. As skin-sparing mastectomies become more commonplace, flap tailoring becomes a more difficult and lengthy process due to lack of exposure through these small incisions. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed on 40 patients using the mastectomy specimen as a model for TRAM flap fabrication. Detailed measurements of the specimen were taken and a template was created as a guide for shaping the flap. All flaps were shaped on the abdomen, and additional tailoring was not necessary after transfer to the chest. Significant differences in weight were recorded between the shaped flap and the specimen. Size, shape, and orientation were found to be more reliable parameters in matching the flap to the specimen than approximating their weights. This approach allows for greater accuracy in shaping the flap, reduces operative time, and avoids flap manipulation after transfer.     

Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared skin-sparing mastectomy and traditional mastectomy both followed by immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Skin-sparing mastectomy is used increasingly in the treatment of breast cancer to improve the aesthetic results of immediate reconstruction. The oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of this procedure have never been analyzed closely. METHODS: Institutional experience with 435 consecutive patients who underwent total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction from January 1989 through December 1994 was examined. Mastectomies were stratified into skin-sparing (SSM) and non-skin-sparing (non-SSM) types. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven SSMs and 188 non-SSMs were performed. The mean follow-up was 41.3 months (SSM, 37.5 months, non-SSM, 48.2 months). Local recurrences from invasive cancer occurred after 4.8% of SSMs versus 9.5% of non-SSMs. Sixty-five percent of patients who underwent SSMs had nothing performed on the opposite breast versus 45% in the group of patients who underwent non-SSM (p = 0.0002). Native skin flap necrosis occurred in 10.7% of patients who underwent SSMs versus 11.2% of patients who underwent non-SSMs. CONCLUSIONS: Skin-sparing mastectomy facilitates immediate breast reconstruction by reducing remedial surgery on the opposite breast. Native skin flap necrosis is not increased over that seen with non-SSM. Skin-sparing mastectomies can be used in the treatment of invasive cancer without compromising local control.     

The peritoneal free flap: an anatomic study

In view of a possible clinical application of an isolated microvascular peritoneal flap, an anatomic study was performed in order to determine the peritoneal vascular territory of the deep inferior epigastric artery. For this, the deep inferior epigastric artery was injected unilaterally with Araldite in 30 embalmed cadavers and bilaterally with india ink in 15 fresh cadavers. In 70 percent of the embalmed cadavers, a constant pattern of three branches from the deep inferior epigastric artery could be identified. The peritoneal vascular supply is not derived solely from these three branches but also from multiple small branches sprouting directly from the main stem of the deep inferior epigastric artery and from segmental and muscular branches. Therefore, classification of peritoneal branches arising from the deep inferior epigastric artery seems to be of little clinical importance. In all cases, the india ink injected in the deep inferior epigastric artery colored a similar territory of the parietal peritoneum. Considering the magnitude of the peritoneal vascularization by the deep inferior epigastric artery, implementation of an isolated free or pedicled peritoneal flap seems to be possible. Such a microvascular peritoneal flap vascularized by the deep inferior epigastric artery may be used, for example, for reconstruction of mucosal defects in the head and neck region.     

The transversus and rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal (TRAMP) composite flap for vulvovaginal reconstruction

The transversus and rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal (TRAMP) flap, a novel composite flap supplied by the deep inferior epigastric vessels, was used successfully for partial vulvovaginal reconstruction following anterior and posterior exenteration. The full potential of the TRAMP flap in vulvovaginal reconstruction is being investigated further.     

Internal mammary artery and vein supercharge in TRAM flap breast reconstruction

To improve the blood supply of the pedicled flap we have performed an additional microvascular augmentation to this type of breast reconstruction procedure since 1991. The ipsilateral deep inferior epigastric pedicle is anastomosed to the internal mammary artery and vein (IMAV supercharge). In 19 of 20 patients this technique proved to be feasible. For the venous anastomoses the 3M microvascular anastomosis system facilitated the procedure. In one patient the venous anastomosis failed due to the small calibre of two internal mammary veins. In a majority of the cases rapid improvement of flap perfusion could be observed as the direct result of the supercharging. The IMAV supercharged flap is quite comparable with the free flap as regards to the operative procedure. Disadvantages are a slightly more extensive dissection and less freedom in positioning the flap due to the presence of the superior muscular pedicle. The main advantage is that the supercharge procedure minimises the risk of total flap loss. Further technical improvement may be obtained by the use of a contralateral vascular pedicle dissected with muscle-sparing techniques.     

Breast reconstruction for malignant or premalignant disease

In ten patients breast reconstruction was done after surgical treatment for a premalignant or malignant breast disease. In six of these, prophylactic subcutaneous mastectomy and implant reconstruction were carried out, and in the remaining four reconstruction was done after simple or modified radical mastectomy. It is suggested that these procedures should be considered by those physicians and surgeons who undertake evaluation and treatment of breast disease in women. Breast reconstruction should be considered and offered to patients who suffer from the severe personal and emotional trauma attendant to surgical operation for breast disease.     

One-year reproducibility and stability of the signal amplitude ratio and other variables of the electromyogram: test-retest of a shoulder forward flexion test in female workers with neck and shoulder problems

BACKGROUND: The role of elective contralateral mastectomy (ECM) in women with early-stage breast cancer who elect or require an ipsilateral mastectomy and desire immediate bilateral breast reconstruction (IBR) is an intellectual and emotional dilemma for both patient and physician. In an attempt to clarify the rationale for this approach, we reviewed our experience with ECM and IBR and evaluated operative morbidity, the incidence of occult contralateral breast cancer, and patterns of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 155 patients with primary unilateral breast cancer (stage 0, I, or II) and negative findings on physical and mammographic examinations of the contralateral breast who underwent ipsilateral mastectomy and simultaneous ECM with IBR between 1987 and 1995. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 25 to 69 years). Clinical stage at diagnosis was stage 0, I, and II in 19.4%, 54.2%, and 26.4% of patients, respectively. Factors likely to influence the use of ECM were family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (30%), any family history of breast cancer (56%), difficulty anticipated in contralateral breast surveillance (48%), associated lobular carcinoma in situ (23%), multicentric primary tumor (28%), significant reconstructive issues (14%), and failure of mammographic identification of the primary tumor (16%). Skin-sparing mastectomies were performed in 81% of patients. Overall, 70% of patients underwent reconstruction using autogenous tissue transfer. Reoperations for suspected anastomotic thrombosis were performed in seven patients. Two patients experienced significant partial or complete flap loss. Histopathologic findings in the ECM specimen were as follows: benign, 80% of patients; atypical ductal hyperplasia, 12% of patients; lobular carcinoma in situ, 6.5% of patients; ductal carcinoma in situ, 2.7% of patients; and invasive carcinoma, 1.3% of patients. Eighteen patients (12%) had evidence of locoregional or distant recurrences, with a median follow-up of 3 years. In one patient (0.6%), invasive ductal carcinoma developed on the side of the elective mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECM and IBR cannot be justified if the only oncologic criterion considered is the incidence of occult synchronous contralateral disease. However, in a highly selected population of young patients with a difficult clinical or mammographic examination and an increased lifetime risk of developing a second primary tumor, ECM and IBR is a safe approach.     

Reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy for carcinoma

During the last 5 years, 80 patients underwent reconstruction of the breast as a primary or secondary procedure after mastectomy for carcinoma. Breast mounds were reconstructed with the silicone breast implant. A Silastic implant corrected the infraclavicular axillary deformity after radical mastectomy. The nipple-areolar complex was created either with a nipple-areolar graft from the contralateral breast or with a labial free graft in a bilateral breast reconstruction. If the contralateral breast was large or ptotic, reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy was performed. Subcutaneous mastectomy or total mastectomy of the other breast with insertion of the silicone breast implant was the method of choice for a group of high-risk patients.