Thrombolysis following myocardial infarct. European Secondary Prevention Study

For evaluation of the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, all cases of ten Zurich hospitals (278, 184 men and 94 women) in the period from 1 January to 31 March 1993 were analyzed retrospectively. 223 patients were released from hospital, 55 died. A follow-up was done 6 months after the patient's discharge by means of a questionnaires to the family doctor (return rate: 65.9%). 48.5% of patients were referred to hospital within the first 6 h. after onset of symptoms, 64% within the first 12 h. 28% (n = 76) of the patients received a thrombolytic therapy, of which 91% (n = 69) got streptokinase and 9% (n = 7) got tissue plasminogen activator. In 81% of the cases the thrombolytic therapy was done within the first hour in hospital, in accumulated 97% of the cases within two hours. In the age group under 65 years (39% of the patients, n = 109), 48 patients received thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0). In the age group between 65 and 74 years (24.5 % of the patients, n = 68), 19 patients received thrombolysis (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42-0.99; p < 0.05), and in the age group over 74 years (36.5% of the patients, n = 101), 9 patients were received thrombolysis (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.28; p < 0.0001). 31% of the patients (n = 46) received a coronary angiography, 15% (n = 22) had coronary angioplasty, and 11% (n = 1) received coronary bypass surgery. There is evidence that there should be more importance attached to early hospitalization, if acute myocardial infarction is suspected. Thereby age alone should be considered as a contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. The issue of assumed underuse of thrombolytic therapy should be investigated all over Switzerland.     

Evaluation of drug treatment of myocardial infarction in public hospitals of Andalusia. GAUME (Andalusian Group for performance of Studies on Drug Utilization)

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed over the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of AMI in the clinical practice, with special emphasis in thrombolytic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective drug utilization survey, collecting data from 26 hospitals belonging to the Andalusian Health Service, Spain, during one month period. Pharmacologic treatment in the first 24 h was obtained. RESULTS: Out of 379 patients recruited, 52.8% received thrombolytic therapy, although another 19% could have obtained some benefit from that therapy. Alteplase was the most frequently used thrombolytic (65.5%). The regimen prescribed was mainly that followed in GUSTO Study (45.8%) or double bolus (43.5%). In a high percentage of patients the thrombolytic selection was not made according to the results of the literature. Women and patients older than 75 years were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy. There was a high utilization of aspirin (89.7%), nitrates (84.4%) and heparin (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed in a higher percentage of patients than is reported in other trials. In spite of that, thrombolytics should have been used in more patients. As alteplase does not have a definitive benefit over streptokinase, protocol is needed when selecting a thrombolytic agent.     

Randomized comparison of direct thrombin inhibition versus heparin in conjunction with fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-IIb Trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) Investigators

OBJECTIVES: We sought to show that hirudin might interact differently with streptokinase (SK) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), which could reduce the incidence of death or reinfarction at 30 days. BACKGROUND: In a large-scale trial of patients with acute coronary syndromes, hirudin provided modest benefit compared with heparin. However, the interaction with thrombolytic agents was not specifically assessed. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction and electrocardiographic ST segment elevation were treated with thrombolytic therapy and randomly assigned to receive hirudin or heparin. RESULTS: A total of 2,274 patients received t-PA, and 1,015 received SK. Baseline characteristics were balanced by antithrombin assignment. Among SK-treated patients, death or reinfarction at 30 days occurred more often in those treated with adjunctive heparin (14.4%) rather than hirudin (8.6%, odds ratio [OR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20 to 2.66, p = 0.004). Among t-PA-treated patients, the rates were 10.9% with heparin and 10.3% with hirudin (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.38, p = 0.68; for treatment heterogeneity: chi-square 4.20, degrees of freedom [df] 1, p = 0.04). After adjustment for baseline differences between thrombolytic groups, the rates were 9.1% for SK with hirudin, 10.3% for t-PA with hirudin, 10.5% for t-PA with heparin and 14.9% for SK with heparin (for treatment heterogeneity: chi-square 4.5, df 1, p = 0.03), suggesting that the beneficial treatment effect of hirudin was limited to the SK-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hirudin interacts favorably with SK but not t-PA, highlighting the importance of thrombin activity after SK therapy and the potential for simulating the effects of a more potent fibrinolytic agent through direct antithrombin therapy.     

Does PTCA in acute myocardial infarction affect mortality and reinfarction rates? A quantitative overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is often performed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) either as an adjuvant to thrombolytic therapy or instead of thrombolysis. The effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction has remained unclear, with the available randomized trials indicating inconsistent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized trials was conducted to assess the effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction rates. Data from 7 trials in which primary PTCA was evaluated and 16 trials in which PTCA after thrombolysis was studied were included in this overview, comprising a total of 8496 patient. The trials represented different approaches to the timing of PTCA after AMI. The trials of PTCA after thrombolytic therapy were also categorized according to the different protocols with respect to the routine or elective character of PTCA in the invasive group. A reduction in short-term (6 week) mortality (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33, 0.94) and in the combined outcome of short-term mortality and nonfatal reinfarction (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.80) was observed in the trials comparing primary PTCA with thrombolytic therapy. In contrast, in trials in which an approach of thrombolysis and PTCA was compared with thrombolytic therapy alone, there was no important difference in early mortality, with an apparent reduction in mortality between 6 and 52 weeks. The lower mortality between 6 and 52 weeks among 6-week survivors seemed to be restricted to the subgroup of trials in which PTCA was used as a routine strategy (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Although the analyses of the various categories of trials suggest that primary PTCA may be more beneficial than thrombolytic therapy in AMI, these data should be interpreted cautiously unless confirmed by larger studies. In contrast, the addition of various other strategies of PTCA to thrombolytic therapy does not convincingly indicate a clinically different outcome than if a more conservative strategy is followed, in which PTCA is used only if clinically indicated. Some specific strategies, however, such as rescue PTCA in high-risk patients with occluded arteries, may be of benefit.     

Management and outcomes for black patients with acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators

Data from a national registry of myocardial infarction patients from June 1994 to April 1996 were analyzed to compare the presenting characteristics, acute reperfusion strategies, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among black and white patients. Blacks presented much later to the hospital after the onset of symptoms (median 145 vs 122 minutes, p <0.001), were more likely to have atypical cardiac symptoms (28% vs 24%, p <0.001), and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms during the initial evaluation period compared with whites (37% vs 31%, p <0.001). Also, blacks were less likely to receive intravenous thrombolytic therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.71 to 0.80), coronary arteriography (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95), other elective catheter-based procedures (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96), and coronary artery bypass surgery (adjusted OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.75) than their white counterparts. Despite these differences in treatment, there were no significant differences in hospital mortality between blacks and whites.     

Predischarge two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular thrombosis after acute myocardial infarction in the GISSI-3 study

Left ventricular (LV) thrombosis can be found in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). No wide multicenter trial on AMI has provided information about LV thrombosis until now. The protocol of the GISSI-3 study included the search for the presence of LV thrombosis in patients from 200 coronary care units that did not specifically focus on LV thrombosis. We examined the GISSI-3 database results related to 8,326 patients at low to medium risk for LV thrombi in which a predischarge echocardiogram (9 +/- 5 days) was available. LV thrombosis was found in 427 patients (5.1%): 292 of 2,544 patients (11.5%) with anterior AMI and in 135 of 5,782 patients (2.3%) with AMI in other sites (p <0.0001). The incidence of LV thrombosis was higher in patients with ejection fraction < or = 40% (151 of 1,432 [10.5%] vs 276 of 6,894 [4%]; p <0.0001) both in the total population and in the subgroup with anterior AMI (106 of 597 [17.8%] vs 186 of 1,947 [9.6%]; p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that only the Killip class > I and early intravenous beta-blocker administration were independently associated with higher LV thrombosis risk in the subgroup of patients with anterior AMI (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 2.39; odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.72, respectively). In patients with anterior AMI, oral beta-blocker therapy given or not given after early intravenous beta-blocker administration does not influence the occurrence of LV thrombosis. The rate of LV thrombosis was similar in patients treated or not treated with nitrates and lisinopril both in the total population and in patients with anterior and nonanterior AMI. In conclusion, in the GISSI-3 population at low to medium risk for LV thrombi, the highest rate of occurrence of LV thrombosis was found among patients with anterior AMI and an ejection fraction < 40%. Killip class > I and the early intravenous beta-blocker administration were the only variables independently associated with a higher predischarge incidence of LV thrombosis after anterior AMI.     

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-outcome optimization methods

Early reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce the extent of myocardial necrosis and to improve short and long term prognosis. Gender, smoking, age and site of infarct location may be regarded as prognostic factors for the outcome of AMI and of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase (STK). The aim of this study was to identify factors, which are related to the results of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. 156 patients (122 males and 34 females) treated with STK were retrospectively analyzed: they were subdivided into 3 groups according to the presumed success of thrombolytic therapy based on the accepted clinical and angiographic TIMI flow criteria. Group 1 = successful (88 patients), group 2 = probably successful (20 patients) and group 3 = failed thrombolysis (48 patients). Multiple regression analysis showed that Killip class (p = 0.0005), time from pain onset to thrombolysis initiation (p = 0.02) and the time of the day in which thrombolysis began (p = 0.037) are independent major predictive factors for successful thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. Gender, age, smoking and some risk factors are not of similar predictive power. These results may guide us in the optimization of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI, different dose regimens for different times of day and probably preference for primary PTCA in the early morning hours.     

Admission to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities :impact on long-term costs and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Admission to a hospital with a capability for cardiac procedures is associated with a higher likelihood of referral for a cardiac procedure but not with a better short-term clinical outcome. Whether there are differences in long-term mortality and resource consumption is not clear. We sought to determine whether elderly Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities have lower long-term hospital costs and better outcomes than patients admitted to hospitals without such facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot in Connecticut, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files. The study sample included 2521 patients with acute myocardial infarction covered by Medicare from 1992 to 1993. The cardiac catheterization rate was higher in the hospitals with facilities (38.6% versus 26.9%; P<0.001), but the revascularization rate was similar (20.5% versus 19.5%) during the initial episode of care and at 3 years (29.7% versus 29.7%). Mortality rates were similar for patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals at 30 days (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.42) and at 3 years (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26). The adjusted readmission rates were significantly lower among patients admitted to hospitals with cardiac catheterization facilities (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94). However, the overall mean days in the hospital for the 3 years after admission was 25.9 for patients admitted to hospitals with facilities and 24.6 for the other patients (P=0.234). Adjusting for baseline patient characteristics, there was no significant difference in the 3-year costs between patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: With higher rates of cardiac catheterization and lower readmission rates, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities did not have significantly different hospital costs compared with patients admitted to hospitals without these facilities. There was also no significant difference in short- or long-term mortality rates.     

Therapy of acute myocardial infarct (1994-1996) at non-university hospitals in Switzerland (CHAMI Study)

The CHAMI study (Confederatio Helvetica Acute Myocardial Infarction) recorded the therapies administered for acute myocardial infarction in 520 consecutive patients between October 1994 and February 1996 at 10 non-academic hospitals in Switzerland. The patients in this group consisted of 363 men and 157 women with an average age of 63.2 years. The prescribed medications administered from the day of hospital admission until the day of discharge were recorded. In the acute phase, the patients were given the following therapy: thrombolytic agents 40%, i.v. nitrates 65%, i.v. beta-blockers 22%, aspirin 95%, oral beta-blockers 36%, ACE inhibitors 14%. Impressive was the lower distribution of thrombolytic agents and beta-blockers among the older patients (age > 70) (thrombolytic agents 52.1% vs 28.4%; oral beta-blockers 44.0% vs 29.1%) and in particular among women (thrombolytic agents 26.8% vs 46%; oral beta-blockers 29.3% vs 39.7%) in men. Therapy at hospital discharge consisted, inter alia, of aspirin (73%), beta-blockers (54%), ACE inhibitors (3%), and lipid lowering agents (10%). The hospital mortality was 12.6%. The CHAMI study provided the participating hospitals with a quality control comparison with other participating centers and impressively demonstrated with the example of the lipid lowering agents, that the significance of secondary prophylaxis is assigned too little importance in contrast to acute therapy.     

Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the relative clinical utility of direct coronary angioplasty compared with that of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The relative merits of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and direct coronary angioplasty as treatment for acute myocardial infarction are incompletely understood, and randomized trials of these treatments have been extremely limited. METHODS: One hundred patients with ST segment elevation presenting to a single high volume interventional center within 6 h of the onset of chest pain were randomized to receive either streptokinase (1.2 million U intravenously over 1 h) or immediate catheterization and direct coronary angioplasty. Patients were excluded for age > or = 75 years, prior bypass surgery, Q wave infarction in the region of ischemia or excessive risk of bleeding. All patients were then treated with aspirin (325 mg orally/day) and heparin (1,000 U intravenously/h) for 48 h until catheterization was performed to determine the primary study end point, namely, infarct-related artery patency at 48 h. Secondary end points were in-hospital death, left ventricular ejection fraction at 48 h and time to treatment. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups. Overall patient age was 56 +/- 10 years, 83% of patients were male, 11% had prior infarction, 40% had anterior infarction and 97% were in Killip class I or II. Although time to treatment was delayed in the angioplasty group (238 +/- 112 vs. 179 +/- 98 min, p = 0.005), there was no difference in 48-h infarct-related artery patency or left ventricular ejection fraction (patency 74% vs. 80%; ejection fraction 59 +/- 13% vs. 57 +/- 13%; angioplasty vs. streptokinase, p = NS for both). There were no major bleeding events, and the mortality rate with angioplasty (6%) and streptokinase (2%) did not differ (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intravenous thrombolytic therapy might be preferred over coronary angioplasty for most patients because of the often shorter time to treatment.     

Current status of neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Randomized trials are the optimal approach for evaluations of treatment efficacy but may not always be feasible. We study the adequacy of the case-control design in evaluating efficacy in a situation where the investigated therapy, namely the administration of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of eclampsia in patients with preeclampsia, has a suspected strong protective effect. A total of 66 cases of eclampsia were ascertained from among deliveries occurring between 1977 and 1992 at two hospitals in Houston, Texas. Randomly selected preeclamptic controls were matched to cases based on hospital and month of delivery. Magnesium sulfate administration prior to seizure occurrence had a strong protective effect against eclampsia in patients with preeclampsia (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05). This protective effect remained when controls were stratified by the degree of severity of preeclampsia (mild-to-moderate OR, 0.03, 95% CI, 0.01-0.09 and severe OR, 0.005; 95% CI, 0.0005-0.04) and when cases were stratified by the timing of the first seizure (antepartum and intrapartum seizures OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.003-0.05 and postpartum seizures OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.005-0.15). The effect also remained after adjustment for other important predictors in a multivariate logistic regression model (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.38). The results of this study are in support of a recent randomized trial on the efficacy of magnesium sulfate as a prophylactic agent against eclampsia. Although there are serious potential sources of bias in this study, the magnitude of the protective effect of magnesium sulfate minimizes the likelihood that this effect can be explained by bias. Observational studies could be appropriate complements or alternatives to randomized trials in situations where a strong treatment effect is expected.     

Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of immediate survival and survival to discharge for adult patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and to identify demographic and clinical variables associated with these outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The MEDLARS database of the National Library of Medicine was searched. In addition, the authors' extensive personal files and the bibliography of each identified study were searched for further studies. Two sets of inclusion criteria were used, minimal (any study of adults undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and strict (included only patients from general ward and intensive care units, and adequately defined cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation). Each study was independently reviewed and abstracted in a nonblinded fashion by two reviewers. The data abstracted were compared, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus discussion. For the subset of studies meeting the strict criteria, the overall rate of immediate survival was 40.7% and the rate of survival to discharge was 13.4%. The following variables were associated with failure to survive to discharge: sepsis on the day prior to resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] 31.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 515), metastatic cancer (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.2, 12. 6), dementia (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1, 8.8), African-American race (OR 2. 8; 95% CI 1.4, 5.6), serum creatinine level at a cutpoint of 1.5 mg/dL (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2, 3.8), cancer (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2, 3.0), coronary artery disease (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.4, 0.8), and location of resuscitation in the intensive care unit (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.4, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: When talking with patients, physicians can describe the overall likelihood of surviving discharge as 1 in 8 for patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 1 in 3 for patients who survive cardiopulmonary resuscitation.     

Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, Holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the ability of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and clinical variables to identify patients at risk of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND: Most studies of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter ECG monitoring in risk stratification after myocardial infarction preceded the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: A consecutive series of 301 survivors of myocardial infarction, 205 (68%) of whom received thrombolytic agents, underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography (1st 48 h, day 6 and discharge), Holter ECG monitoring (days 6 to 7) and radionuclide left ventriculography (days 7 to 14). Median follow-up time was 1.03 years. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (4.3%) had an arrhythmic event (sudden death in 11, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 2). The 25-Hz high pass filtered signal-averaged ECG at discharge was 64% sensitive (95% confidence intervals [CI] 36% to 92%) and 81% specific (95% CI 76% to 86%). High grade ventricular ectopic activity on the Holter ECG was only 38% sensitive (95% CI 12% to 64%) and 74% specific (95% CI 71% to 77%). Left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.4 was the best test for prediction of arrhythmic events (sensitivity 75% [95% CI 50% to 100%] and specificity 81% [95% CI 76% to 85%]). In multivariate analysis, in rank order, digoxin therapy at discharge, an abnormal 25-Hz signal-averaged ECG before discharge, absence of angina before index infarction and previous infarction were predictive of arrhythmic events. With digoxin therapy excluded, ejection fraction was an independent predictor. Discriminant analysis identified a high risk group (12% of the study patients) with an event rate of 26%. CONCLUSIONS: The signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction are each independently predictive of arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction, but the Holter ECG is not. A combination of clinical and investigative variables, including the signal-averaged ECG, best identifies patients at highest risk.     

Cost finding in the diagnostic imaging service

Antibiotic prophylaxis after basilar skull fractures remains controversial. Previous studies have not clearly delineated the utility of prophylactic antibiotics in this setting. We undertook this study to determine if antibiotic prophylaxis after basilar skull fractures prevented meningitis. We performed a formal systematic review of previously published studies after a computerized search with use of the MEDLINE data base (1970-1996). Fourteen studies were identified, and 12 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Study design and quality were assessed by two independent investigators with use of a predetermined protocol. A total of 1,241 patients with basilar skull fractures were included; 719 patients received antibiotics, and 522 patients did not receive antibiotics. Overall results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis did not prevent meningitis among patients with basilar skull fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68-1.94; P = .678). Patients with basilar skull fractures and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were analyzed separately (OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.75-2.41; P = .358), as were children (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.07-14.90; P = 1.000). Antibiotic prophylaxis after basilar skull fractures does not appear to decrease the risk of meningitis.     

Thoracic transplantation in 1998

Sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for suicidal ideation have been less studied than risk factors for parasuicide and suicide. No reports on associations between therapy satisfaction and suicidal ideation among psychiatric patients have been published. In this study we compared a group of patients with suicidal ideation (n = 84) with a randomly selected group of nonsuicidal patients (n = 166) in community-based psychiatric services. Patients with suicidal ideation felt a need for psychiatric treatment more often than nonsuicidal patients. They were also more likely to receive antidepressive medication, and weekly therapy sessions were more common among them. A wish to change therapist (OR 15.6, 95% CI 3.6-67.8), hopeless future orientation (OR 14.8, 95% CI 4.5-48.9), severe depression as evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (OR 14.0, 95% CI 4.3-45.2) and dysthymia (OR 12.8, 95% CI 1.7-97.3) were the factors most strongly associated with suicidal ideation in multivariate analysis. A wish to change therapist is an expression of therapy dissatisfaction, which may therefore be among the factors most strongly associated with suicidal ideation in psychiatric patients. To help prevent suicidality among psychiatric patients special attention to therapy factors is needed.     

Usefulness of ST-segment depression in non-infarct-related electrocardiographic leads in predicting prognosis after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

This study investigated both the in-hospital and long-term prognostic significance of ST-segment depression in non-infarct-related leads in patients who received thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated 221 consecutive patients who were admitted with their first AMI and underwent thrombolysis. Patients were followed for an average of 31 months and were classified into 3 groups: group 1 included 51 patients with persistent ST-segment depression, group 2 had 97 patients with transient ST-segment depression, and group 3 consisted of 73 patients without ST-segment depression (absent). Group 1 had significantly worse long-term survival during follow up by Kaplan-Meier analysis (55%) versus group 2 (81%) and group 3 (94%) (p = 0.0004) and higher event rates. This prognostic significance seemed to be maintained in both the anterior and inferior wall AMI groups. Multivariate analysis, using the Cox model, showed that Killip class, in-hospital left ventricular ejection fraction, and the persistence of ST-segment depression on the predischarge electrocardiogram (group 1) were independent predictors of survival. ST-segment depression in non-infarct-related leads on the predischarge electrocardiogram is an independent risk factor for worse long-term survival after anterior as well as inferior AMI treated with thrombolytic therapy.     

Improvement in long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction after the introduction of intravenous thrombolytic therapy

Survival rate from a "thrombolytic" period of 351 patients above 66 years of age with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was compared with that of 289 patients from a "prethrombolytic" period. The two groups were comparable regarding sex, age, previous AMI, cerebrovascular events, morbidity and mortality during admission. Survival rates after four years were 45.0% in the "thrombolytic" group and 38.4% in the "prethrombolytic" group (p = 0.047, log rank test). Using the Cox proportional hazard analysis, thrombolytic therapy was shown to be an independent prognostic predictor in "the thrombolytic population" with a relative risk of death from day 30 to end of follow-up of 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.2-0.8). No interaction was found between age and thrombolysis. Although only one-fifth of the patients with AMI were eligible for thrombolysis, this treatment may have contributed to the improved long-term survival.     

Improved posterobasal segment function after thrombolysis is associated with decreased incidence of significant mitral regurgitation in a first inferior myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the association between wall motion abnormalities and the occurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with a first inferior or posterior myocardial infarction and to reassess the role of thrombolytic treatment in these patients. BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that thrombolytic therapy reduces the incidence of significant mitral regurgitation in patients with a first inferior myocardial infarction, but the mechanisms responsible for this decrease were not clear. METHODS: Wall motion score on two-dimensional echocardiography (16 segments) and mitral regurgitation grade (0 to 3) on Doppler color flow imaging were assessed in 95 patients (in 47 after thrombolysis) at 24 h, 7 to 10 days and 1 month after myocardial infarction. Significant mitral regurgitation was defined as moderate or severe (grade 2 or 3). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of an advanced wall motion abnormality of the posterobasal segment of the left ventricle was the most significant independent variable associated with significant mitral regurgitation: odds ratio (OR) 15.0, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 165.6 at 24 h; OR 2.8, CI 0.9 to 9.3 at 7 to 10 days; OR 4.2, CI 1.2 to 11.4 at 1 month. Thrombolysis reduced the prevalence of advanced wall motion abnormalities in the posterobasal segment at 24 h (55% vs. 75%, OR 0.5, CI 0.2 to 0.99), 7 to 10 days (44% vs. 73%, OR 0.3, CI 0.1 to 0.7) and 1 month (36% vs. 56%, OR 0.4, CI 0.2 to 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between advanced wall motion abnormalities in the posterobasal segment and significant mitral regurgitation. In this study group, thrombolysis reduced the prevalence of advanced wall motion abnormalities in the posterobasal segment and thereby reduced the incidence of significant mitral regurgitation.