Tear evaporation rates: What does the literature tell us?

Purpose

A previous literature review reported tear evaporation rates (TERs) from studies conducted on rabbits and humans between 1941 and 2003. Closer examination of the presented data revealed inaccuracies in the reporting of some values. This paper presents updated tables of TERs using values from the original papers cited in the review, in addition to incorporating new studies published between 2003 and 2016.

Dry eye and Meibomian gland dysfunction with meibography in patients with lamellar ichthyosis

Purpose

To evaluate the dry eye findings and Meibomian gland dysfunction as demonstrated with meibography in patients with lamellar ichthyosis.

Hot towels: The bedrock of Meibomian gland dysfunction treatment – A review

BackgroundMeibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) reduces quality-of-life and hinders work productivity of millions of patients, with high direct and indirect societal costs. Thickened meibum obstructs the glands and disrupts ocular surface health. Heating the eyelids to soften and express meibum from the glands can be beneficial. The most accessible method for eyelid warming uses heated, wet towels. However, the efficacy of this treatment is reliant on the methodology, and evidence-based best-practice recommendations are needed.PurposeTo evaluate the literature on hot towels in MGD treatment and recommend a best-practice protocol for future research and patient treatment.MethodsStudies were identified through PubMed on the May 28, 2021, with the search terms: (warm* OR heat* OR thermal* OR towel OR wet towel) AND (meibomian OR MGD OR eyelid OR “dry eye” OR DED). All relevant original articles with English full-text were included.ResultsThe search yielded 903 results, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria. Across studies, hot towels were found to be effective at reducing ocular symptoms. However, without reheating, the temperature quickly fell below the therapeutic range, which was deemed to be between 40 °C and 47 °C. Towels heated to around 45 °C and reheated every-two minutes were most effective at increasing eyelid temperature, comparable or better than several commercially available eyelid warming devices. No adverse effects were reported in the studies.ConclusionHot towel treatment effectively warms the eyelids and reduces ocular symptoms, but must be standardized, and towels reheated to achieve maximum benefit. Future research should assess patient satisfaction with different hot towel treatment methods that reheat or replace the towel at least every-two minutes, to establish which methods yield the greatest compliance. Guidelines or clinical recommendations that do not mention the need for regular reheating during hot towel compress treatment should be updated to include this.     

The effect of non-ablative thermomechanical skin treatment (Tixel®) on dry eye disease: A prospective two centre open-label trial

PurposeTo determine the effects of a thermo-mechanical action-based peri-orbital fractional skin treatment (Tixel®) on dry eye disease.MethodsThis prospective, controlled, open labelled study was conducted at two study centres: Midland Eye, Solihull, UK, and Vallmedic Vision, Andorra. Participants were screened at the baseline visit (visit-1), received three Tixel® treatments at 2-weeks intervals including further assessment (visits 2, 3 and 4). Participants were followed up for three months post-treatment (visit 5). Vision, intraocular pressure (IOP), dry eye symptomatology were assessed, including the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) and tear osmolarity as well as detailed ophthalmic assessments.ResultsSeventy-four participants (41 in Birmingham and 33 in Andorra) with periorbital wrinkles and moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED) were enrolled. The mean age was 59.3 ± 13.3 years and 57 were females. No adverse events, no change in vision (p = 0.310) or IOP (p = 0.419) were observed. Tixel treatment was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvement in the DED symptoms, which was supported by a reduction of 21.40 ± 15.08 (P < 0.001) of the OSDI index. Non-invasive tear break-up time improved by 2.10 ± 0.91 s (p < 0.001) in the Birmingham cohort and 6.60 ± 2.13 s (p < 0.001) in the Andorra cohort. Tear osmolarity reduced from 299.8 ± 13.3 mOsm/L to 298.8 ± 15.6 mOsm/L following the Tixel treatment (p = 0.271).ConclusionsThermo-mechanical action-based peri-orbital fractional skin treatment Tixel® could be an attractive, safe and effective treatment for DED. This treatment is associated with high clinical and statistically significant improvement in DED signs and symptoms with no adverse events.     

The effect of thermo-mechanical device (Tixel) treatment on evaporative dry eye disease – A pilot prospective clinical trial

PurposeTo examine the effects of treatment with a thermomechanical skin device to the eyelid area on the clinical signs and symptoms of patients who suffer from dry eye disease (DED) secondary to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).MethodsForty patients aged 45 years or older with DED due to MGD were recruited. Both eyes (n = 80) of each patient received three treatments with the Tixel device (Novoxel®, Israel), with each treatment separated by a 2-week period. Treatment was applied across the upper and lower eyelids, with the same intensity, tip protrusion distance, and contact duration. Two additional follow-up visits were performed at 2-week intervals after treatment cessation. DED status was evaluated during each visit via SPEED II questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining score (CSS), MGD score, and frequency of lubricant use. Visual acuity (VA) was recorded during first and last visits.ResultsMean age was 64.3 ± 12.4 years and 72.5 % (n = 29) were female. 45 % (n = 18) had a history of blepharitis, 12.5 % (n = 5) had chalazia, and 17.5 % (n = 7) suffered from allergic conjunctivitis. Mean follow-up time was 2.1 ± 0.6 months. Comparing the first and last visits, all parameters showed significant improvement after Tixel treatment: mean SPEED II scores (16.5 ± 5.9 to 11.8 ± 6.7, p < 0.001), CSS (2.0 ± 1.3 to 0.5 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), TBUT (2.7 ± 0.8 s to 6.5 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.001), MGD score (2.7 ± 0.5 to 1.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001), and rate of lubricant use (3.4 ± 2.4 per day to 1.9 ± 2.0, p < 0.001). VA also improved (0.10 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.08 ± 0.10 logMAR, p < 0.05). No major side effects were observed.ConclusionsIn this pilot study Tixel treatment induced significant improvement of signs and symptoms among patients with DED due to MGD. Benefits persisted for at least one month. Further randomized controlled double-blinded studies are needed.     

The eyelids and tear film in contact lens discomfort

Purpose

To investigate characteristics of the eyelid margins, meibomian glands and the tear film of contact lens wearers, and to determine whether these characteristics were related to symptoms of contact lens discomfort.