Algorithms for Placing Monitors in a Flow Network

In the Flow Edge-Monitor Problem, we are given an undirected graph G=(V,E), an integer k>0 and some unknown circulation ψ on G. We want to find a set of k edges in G, so that if we place k monitors on those edges to measure the flow along them, the total number of edges for which the flow can be uniquely determined is maximized. In this paper, we first show that the Flow Edge-Monitor Problem is NP-hard. Then we study an algorithm called σ-Greedy that, in each step, places monitors on σ edges for which the number of edges where the flow is determined is maximized. We show that the approximation ratio of 1-Greedy is 3 and that the approximation ratio of 2-Greedy is 2.     

On Cutwidth Parameterized by Vertex Cover

We study the Cutwidth problem, where the input is a graph G, and the objective is find a linear layout of the vertices that minimizes the maximum number of edges intersected by any vertical line inserted between two consecutive vertices. We give an algorithm for Cutwidth with running time O(2 ^k n ^O(1)). Here k is the size of a minimum vertex cover of the input graph G, and n is the number of vertices in G. Our algorithm gives an O(2 ^n/2 n ^O(1)) time algorithm for Cutwidth on bipartite graphs as a corollary. This is the first non-trivial exact exponential time algorithm for Cutwidth on a graph class where the problem remains NP-complete. Additionally, we show that Cutwidth parameterized by the size of the minimum vertex cover of the input graph does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP?coNP/poly. Our kernelization lower bound contrasts with the recent results of Bodlaender et al. (ICALP, Springer, Berlin, 2011; SWAT, Springer, Berlin, 2012) that both Treewidth and Pathwidth parameterized by vertex cover do admit polynomial kernels.     

Vertex Cover Kernelization Revisited

An important result in the study of polynomial-time preprocessing shows that there is an algorithm which given an instance (G,k) of Vertex Cover outputs an equivalent instance (G′,k′) in polynomial time with the guarantee that G′ has at most 2k′ vertices (and thus $\mathcal{O}((k')^{2})$ edges) with k′≤k. Using the terminology of parameterized complexity we say that k-Vertex Cover has a kernel with 2k vertices. There is complexity-theoretic evidence that both 2k vertices and Θ(k ²) edges are optimal for the kernel size. In this paper we consider the Vertex Cover problem with a different parameter, the size $\mathop{\mathrm{\mbox{\textsc{fvs}}}}(G)$ of a minimum feedback vertex set for G. This refined parameter is structurally smaller than the parameter k associated to the vertex covering number $\mathop{\mathrm{\mbox {\textsc{vc}}}}(G)$ since $\mathop{\mathrm{\mbox{\textsc{fvs}}}}(G)\leq\mathop{\mathrm{\mbox{\textsc{vc}}}}(G)$ and the difference can be arbitrarily large. We give a kernel for Vertex Cover with a number of vertices that is cubic in $\mathop{\mathrm{\mbox{\textsc{fvs}}}}(G)$ : an instance (G,X,k) of Vertex Cover, where X is a feedback vertex set for G, can be transformed in polynomial time into an equivalent instance (G′,X′,k′) such that |V(G′)|≤2k and $|V(G')| \in\mathcal{O}(|X'|^{3})$ . A similar result holds when the feedback vertex set X is not given along with the input. In sharp contrast we show that the Weighted Vertex Cover problem does not have a polynomial kernel when parameterized by the cardinality of a given vertex cover of the graph unless NP ? coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the third level.     

Property Testing on k-Vertex-Connectivity of?Graphs

We present an algorithm for testing the k-vertex-connectivity of graphs with the given maximum degree. The time complexity of the algorithm is independent of the number of vertices and edges of graphs. Fixed degree bound d, a graph G with n vertices and a maximum degree at most d is called ε-far from k-vertex-connectivity when at least $\frac{\epsilon dn}{2}$ edges must be added to or removed from G to obtain a k-vertex-connected graph with a maximum degree at most d. The algorithm always accepts every graph that is k-vertex-connected and rejects every graph that is ε-far from k-vertex-connectivity with a probability of at least 2/3. The algorithm runs in $O(d(\frac{c}{\epsilon d})^{k}\log\frac {1}{\epsilon d})$ time (c>1 is a constant) for (k?1)-vertex-connected graphs, and in $O(d(\frac{ck}{\epsilon d})^{k}\log\frac{k}{\epsilon d})$ time (c>1 is a constant) for general graphs. It is the first constant-time k-vertex-connectivity testing algorithm for general k≥4.     

Detecting Fixed Patterns in Chordal Graphs in Polynomial Time

The Contractibility problem takes as input two graphs G and H, and the task is to decide whether H can be obtained from G by a sequence of edge contractions. The Induced Minor and Induced Topological Minor problems are similar, but the first allows both edge contractions and vertex deletions, whereas the latter allows only vertex deletions and vertex dissolutions. All three problems are NP-complete, even for certain fixed graphs H. We show that these problems can be solved in polynomial time for every fixed H when the input graph G is chordal. Our results can be considered tight, since these problems are known to be W[1]-hard on chordal graphs when parameterized by the size of H. To solve Contractibility and Induced Minor, we define and use a generalization of the classic Disjoint Paths problem, where we require the vertices of each of the k paths to be chosen from a specified set. We prove that this variant is NP-complete even when k=2, but that it is polynomial-time solvable on chordal graphs for every fixed k. Our algorithm for Induced Topological Minor is based on another generalization of Disjoint Paths called Induced Disjoint Paths, where the vertices from different paths may no longer be adjacent. We show that this problem, which is known to be NP-complete when k=2, can be solved in polynomial time on chordal graphs even when k is part of the input. Our results fit into the general framework of graph containment problems, where the aim is to decide whether a graph can be modified into another graph by a sequence of specified graph operations. Allowing combinations of the four well-known operations edge deletion, edge contraction, vertex deletion, and vertex dissolution results in the following ten containment relations: (induced) minor, (induced) topological minor, (induced) subgraph, (induced) spanning subgraph, dissolution, and contraction. Our results, combined with existing results, settle the complexity of each of the ten corresponding containment problems on chordal graphs.     

Maximum Series-Parallel Subgraph

Consider the NP-hard problem of, given a simple graph?G, to find a series-parallel subgraph of?G with the maximum number of edges. The algorithm that, given a connected graph?G, outputs a spanning tree of?G, is a $\frac{1}{2}$ -approximation. Indeed, if n is the number of vertices in G, any spanning tree in G has?n?1 edges and any series-parallel graph on?n vertices has at most?2n?3 edges. We present a $\frac{7}{12}$ -approximation for this problem and results showing the limits of our approach.     

Spectral Sparsification in the Semi-streaming Setting

Let G be a graph with n vertices and m edges. A sparsifier of G is a sparse graph on the same vertex set approximating G in some natural way. It allows us to say useful things about G while considering much fewer than m edges. The strongest commonly-used notion of sparsification is spectral sparsification; H is a spectral sparsifier of G if the quadratic forms induced by the Laplacians of G and H approximate one another well. This notion is strictly stronger than the earlier concept of combinatorial sparsification. In this paper, we consider a semi-streaming setting, where we have only $\tilde{O}(n)$ storage space, and we thus cannot keep all of G. In this case, maintaining a sparsifier instead gives us a useful approximation to G, allowing us to answer certain questions about the original graph without storing all of it. We introduce an algorithm for constructing a spectral sparsifier of G with O(nlogn/? ²) edges (where ? is a parameter measuring the quality of the sparsifier), taking $\tilde{O}(m)$ time and requiring only one pass over G. In addition, our algorithm has the property that it maintains at all times a valid sparsifier for the subgraph of G that we have received. Our algorithm is natural and conceptually simple. As we read edges of G, we add them to the sparsifier H. Whenever H gets too big, we resparsify it in $\tilde{O}(n)$ time. Adding edges to a graph changes the structure of its sparsifier’s restriction to the already existing edges. It would thus seem that the above procedure would cause errors to compound each time that we resparsify, and that we should need to either retain significantly more information or reexamine previously discarded edges in order to construct the new sparsifier. However, we show how to use the information contained in H to perform this resparsification using only the edges retained by earlier steps in nearly linear time.     

Faster Parameterized Algorithms for <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">Minimum Fill-in</Emphasis>

We present two parameterized algorithms for the Minimum Fill-in problem, also known as Chordal Completion: given an arbitrary graph G and integer k, can we add at most k edges to G to obtain a chordal graph? Our first algorithm has running time \(\mathcal {O}(k^{2}nm+3.0793^{k})\), and requires polynomial space. This improves the base of the exponential part of the best known parameterized algorithm time for this problem so far. We are able to improve this running time even further, at the cost of more space. Our second algorithm has running time \(\mathcal {O}(k^{2}nm+2.35965^{k})\) and requires \(\mathcal {O}^{\ast}(1.7549^{k})\) space. To achieve these results, we present a new lemma describing the edges that can safely be added to achieve a chordal completion with the minimum number of edges, regardless of k.     

gbase: an efficient analysis platform for large graphs

Graphs appear in numerous applications including cyber security, the Internet, social networks, protein networks, recommendation systems, citation networks, and many more. Graphs with millions or even billions of nodes and edges are common-place. How to store such large graphs efficiently? What are the core operations/queries on those graph? How to answer the graph queries quickly? We propose Gbase, an efficient analysis platform for large graphs. The key novelties lie in (1) our storage and compression scheme for a parallel, distributed settings and (2) the carefully chosen graph operations and their efficient implementations. We designed and implemented an instance of Gbase using Mapreduce/Hadoop. Gbase provides a parallel indexing mechanism for graph operations that both saves storage space, as well as accelerates query responses. We run numerous experiments on real and synthetic graphs, spanning billions of nodes and edges, and we show that our proposed Gbase is indeed fast, scalable, and nimble, with significant savings in space and time.     

Exact Algorithms for Finding Longest Cycles in Claw-Free Graphs

The Hamiltonian Cycle problem is the problem of deciding whether an n-vertex graph G has a cycle passing through all vertices of G. This problem is a classic NP-complete problem. Finding an exact algorithm that solves it in ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(\alpha^{n})$ time for some constant α<2 was a notorious open problem until very recently, when Björklund presented a randomized algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.657^{n})$ time and polynomial space. The Longest Cycle problem, in which the task is to find a cycle of maximum length, is a natural generalization of the Hamiltonian Cycle problem. For a claw-free graph G, finding a longest cycle is equivalent to finding a closed trail (i.e., a connected even subgraph, possibly consisting of a single vertex) that dominates the largest number of edges of some associated graph H. Using this translation we obtain two deterministic algorithms that solve the Longest Cycle problem, and consequently the Hamiltonian Cycle problem, for claw-free graphs: one algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.6818^{n})$ time and exponential space, and one algorithm that uses ${\mathcal {O}}^{*}(1.8878^{n})$ time and polynomial space.     

Improved Approximation Algorithms for the Min-max Tree Cover and Bounded Tree Cover Problems

In this paper we provide improved approximation algorithms for the Min-Max Tree Cover and Bounded Tree Cover problems. Given a graph G=(V,E) with weights w:E→?⁺, a set T ₁,T ₂,…,T _k of subtrees of G is called a tree cover of G if $V=\bigcup_{i=1}^{k} V(T_{i})$ . In the Min-Max k-tree Cover problem we are given graph G and a positive integer k and the goal is to find a tree cover with k trees, such that the weight of the largest tree in the cover is minimized. We present a 3-approximation algorithm for this improving the two different approximation algorithms presented in Arkin et al. (J. Algorithms 59:1–18, 2006) and Even et al. (Oper. Res. Lett. 32(4):309–315, 2004) with ratio 4. The problem is known to have an APX-hardness lower bound of $\frac{3}{2}$ (Xu and Wen in Oper. Res. Lett. 38:169–173, 2010). In the Bounded Tree Cover problem we are given graph G and a bound λ and the goal is to find a tree cover with minimum number of trees such that each tree has weight at most λ. We present a 2.5-approximation algorithm for this, improving the 3-approximation bound in Arkin et al. (J. Algorithms 59:1–18, 2006).     

An Improved FPT Algorithm and a Quadratic Kernel for Pathwidth One Vertex Deletion

The Pathwidth One Vertex Deletion (POVD) problem asks whether, given an undirected graph?G and an integer k, one can delete at most k vertices from?G so that the remaining graph has pathwidth at most 1. The question can be considered as a natural variation of the extensively studied Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) problem, where the deletion of at most k vertices has to result in the remaining graph having treewidth at most 1 (i.e., being a forest). Recently Philip et?al. (WG, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.?6410, pp.?196?C207, 2010) initiated the study of the parameterized complexity of POVD, showing a quartic kernel and an algorithm which runs in time 7 ^k n ^O(1). In this article we improve these results by showing a quadratic kernel and an algorithm with time complexity 4.65 ^k n ^O(1), thus obtaining almost tight kernelization bounds when compared to the general result of Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC, pp.?251?C260, ACM, New York, 2010). Techniques used in the kernelization are based on the quadratic kernel for FVS, due to Thomassé (ACM Trans. Algorithms 6(2), 2010).     

Approximating the Sparsest k-Subgraph in Chordal Graphs

Given a simple undirected graph G = (V, E) and an integer k < |V|, the Sparsest k-Subgraph problem asks for a set of k vertices which induces the minimum number of edges. As a generalization of the classical independent set problem, Sparsest k-Subgraph is ????-hard and even not approximable unless ?????? in general graphs. Thus, we investigate Sparsest k-Subgraph in graph classes where independent set is polynomial-time solvable, such as subclasses of perfect graphs. Our two main results are the ????-hardness of Sparsest k-Subgraph on chordal graphs, and a greedy 2-approximation algorithm. Finally, we also show how to derive a P T A S for Sparsest k-Subgraph on proper interval graphs.     

Matching and spanning in certain planar graphs

Call a connected planar graphG legal if it has at least two nodes, no parallel edges or self-loops and at most two terminals (degree 1 nodes) and all terminals and degree 2 nodes are exterior. This class of graphs arose in connection with a two-dimensional generating system for modeling growth by binary cell division. Showing that any permitted pattern can be generated properly requires a matching or pairing lemma. The vertex set of a legal graph withn nodes can be split intop adjacent pairs ands singletons withs p, resulting in a matching which includes at least \(2\left[ {\frac{n}{3}} \right]\) nodes. This bound is sharp in the sense that there are legal graphs for which this matching is maximum. The matching can be implemented by a linear time algorithm. A legal graph witht terminals and n≥4 nodes has a spanning tree with at most \(\left[ {\frac{{n - t}}{2}} \right] + t\) terminals; this bound is sharp. Such a spanning tree can be constructed by an algorithm which operates in almost linear time.     

The Kernelization Complexity of Connected Domination in Graphs with (no) Small Cycles

In the Parameterized Connected Dominating Set problem the input consists of a graph G and a positive integer k, and the question is whether there is a set S of at most k vertices in G—a connected dominating set of G—such that (i) S is a dominating set of G, and (ii) the subgraph G[S] induced by S is connected; the parameter is k. The underlying decision problem is a basic connectivity problem which is long known to be NP-complete, and it has been extensively studied using several algorithmic approaches. Parameterized Connected Dominating Set is W[2]-hard, and therefore it is unlikely (Downey and Fellows, Parameterized Complexity, Springer, 1999) that the problem has fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms or polynomial kernels in graphs in general. We investigate the effect of excluding short cycles, as subgraphs, on the kernelization complexity of Parameterized Connected Dominating Set. The girth of a graph G is the length of a shortest cycle in G. It turns out that the Parameterized Connected Dominating Set problem is hard on graphs with small cycles, and becomes progressively easier as the girth increases. More precisely, we obtain the following kernelization landscape: Parameterized Connected Dominating Set

• does not have a kernel of any size on graphs of girth three or four (since the problem is W[2]-hard);
• admits a kernel of size 2 ^k k ^3k on graphs of girth at least five;
• has no polynomial kernel (unless the Polynomial Hierarchy collapses to the third level) on graphs of girth at most six, and,
• has a cubic ( $\mathcal {O}(k^{3})$ ) vertex kernel on graphs of girth at least seven.

While there is a large and growing collection of parameterized complexity results available for problems on graph classes characterized by excluded minors, our results add to the very few known in the field for graph classes characterized by excluded subgraphs.     

Node bisectors of Cayley graphs

A node bisector of a graph Γ is a subset Ω of the nodes of Γ such that Γ may be expressed as the disjoint union $$\Gamma = \Omega _1 \dot \cup \Omega \dot \cup \Omega _2 ,$$ , where $\left| {\Omega _1 } \right| \geqslant \frac{1}{3}\left| \Gamma \right|,\Omega _2 \geqslant \frac{1}{3}\left| \Gamma \right|$ , and where any path from Ω₁ to Ω₂ must pass through Ω. Suppose Γ is the Cayley graph of an abelian groupG with respect to a generating set of cardinalityr, regarded as an undirected graph. Then we show that Γ has a node bisector of order at mostc¦G ^1-1/r wherec is a constant depending only onr. We show that the exponent in this result is the best possible.     

Augmenting Edge-Connectivity between Vertex Subsets

Given a directed or undirected graph G=(V,E), a collection ${\mathcal{R}}=\{(S_{i},T_{i}) \mid i=1,2,\ldots,|{\mathcal{R}}|, S_{i},T_{i} \subseteq V, S_{i} \cap T_{i} =\emptyset\}$ of two disjoint subsets of V, and a requirement function $r: {\mathcal{R}} \to\mathbb{R}_{+}$ , we consider the problem (called area-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation problem) of augmenting G by a smallest number of new edges so that the resulting graph $\hat{G}$ satisfies $d_{\hat{G}}(X)\geq r(S,T)$ for all X?V, $(S,T) \in{\mathcal{R}}$ with S?X?V?T, where d _G (X) denotes the degree of a vertex set X in G. This problem can be regarded as a natural generalization of the global, local, and node-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation problems. In this paper, we show that there exists a constant c such that the problem is inapproximable within a ratio of $c\log{|{\mathcal{R}}|}$ , unless P=NP, even restricted to the directed global node-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation or undirected local node-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation. We also provide an ${\mathrm{O}}(\log{|{\mathcal{R}}|})$ -approximation algorithm for the area-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation problem, which is a natural extension of Kortsarz and Nutov’s algorithm (Kortsarz and Nutov, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 74:662–670, 2008). This together with the negative result implies that the problem is ${\varTheta}(\log{|{\mathcal{R}}|})$ -approximable, unless P=NP, which solves open problems for node-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation in Ishii et al. (Algorithmica, 56:413–436, 2010), Ishii and Hagiwara (Discrete Appl. Math., 154:2307–2329, 2006), Miwa and Ito (J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn., 47:224–243, 2004). Furthermore, we characterize the node-to-area and area-to-area edge-connectivity augmentation problems as the augmentation problems with modulotone and k-modulotone functions.     

Finding Induced Paths of Given Parity in Claw-Free Graphs

The Parity Path problem is to decide if a given graph contains both an induced path of odd length and an induced path of even length between two specified vertices. In the related problems Odd Induced Path and Even Induced Path, the goal is to determine whether an induced path of odd, respectively even, length between two specified vertices exists. Although all three problems are NP-complete in general, we show that they can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time for the class of claw-free graphs. Two vertices s and t form an even pair in G if every induced path from s to t in G has even length. Our results imply that the problem of deciding if two specified vertices of a claw-free graph form an even pair, as well as the problem of deciding if a given claw-free graph has an even pair, can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time, respectively. We also show that we can decide in $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time whether a claw-free graph has an induced cycle of given parity through a specified vertex. Finally, we show that a shortest induced path of given parity between two specified vertices of a claw-free perfect graph can be found in $\mathcal {O}(n^{7})$ time.     

Orthogonal Graph Drawing with Flexibility Constraints

Traditionally, the quality of orthogonal planar drawings is quantified by either the total number of bends, or the maximum number of bends per edge. However, this neglects that in typical applications, edges have varying importance. In this work, we investigate an approach that allows to specify the maximum number of bends for each edge individually, depending on its importance. We consider a new problem called FlexDraw that is defined as follows. Given a planar graph G=(V,E) on n vertices with maximum degree 4 and a function $\operatorname{flex}: E \longrightarrow\mathbb{N}_{0}$ that assigns a flexibility to each edge, does G admit a planar embedding on the grid such that each edge e has at most $\operatorname{flex}(e)$ bends? Note that in our setting the combinatorial embedding of G is not fixed. FlexDraw directly extends the problem β-embeddability asking whether G can be embedded with at most β bends per edge. We give an algorithm with running-time O(n ²) solving FlexDraw when the flexibility of each edge is positive. This includes 1-embeddability as a special case and thus closes the complexity gap between 0-embeddability, which is $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard to decide, and 2-embeddability, which is efficiently solvable since every planar graph with maximum degree 4 admits a 2-embedding except for the octahedron. In addition to the polynomial-time algorithm we show that FlexDraw is $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard even if the edges with flexibility 0 induce a tree or a union of disjoint stars.