Carboplatin in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A phase II study

Seventy-one patients with epithelial ovarian cancer stage III (n = 56) or IV (n = 15) were treated with carboplatin 300 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 every fourth week. Patients clinically free of tumour after six courses (n = 58) underwent a second-look laparotomy. Seventeen patients were microscopically tumour-free (24% of all) and an additional 10 (14%) had only microscopic cancer. Median time to progression was 19 months. The median survival was 33 months and the estimated 5-year survival 27%. The toxicity was mainly haematological, with leukopenia WHO grade 3-4 seen in 88% and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 42% of the patients. The gastrointestinal toxicity was mild and no renal toxicity was seen. This chemotherapy regimen was effective with acceptable toxicity and could be given on an out-patient basis. The possibility of increasing the efficacy and decreasing the toxicity was discussed.     

Phase I/II trial of dexverapamil, epirubicin, and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cytotoxic regimen consisting of the second-generation chemosensitizer dexverapamil (DVPM), high dose epirubicin, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied. Treatment consisted of oral DVPM at a dose of 1000-1200 mg/day for 3 days, epirubicin administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Day 2 with an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, and a dose of GM-CSF of 400 micrograms administered subcutaneously from Day 5s through 14. Epirubicin dose escalation levels were 90, 105, 120 and 135 mg/m2. Consecutive cohorts of four to eight patients were planned at each dose level. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, specifically granulocytopenia, constituted the dose-limiting toxicity with an MTD of 120 mg/m2 for epirubicin. Despite routine supportive therapy with GM-CSF, four, two, and five patients experienced Grade 4 granulocytopenia during their first two treatment courses at levels 105, 120, and 135 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two, three, and one additional patients during subsequent courses with these levels. Nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon, generally modest, and did not correlate clearly with the anthracycline dose. Dexverapamil-related cardiovascular symptoms occurred frequently, but they never resulted in serious toxicity requiring active medical intervention or permanent discontinuation of therapy. Nine of 28 patients achieved partial responses to this therapy. Stable disease was observed in nine patients, and tumor progress occurred in 10. CONCLUSION: The MTD of epirubicin for this regimen with DVPM and GM-CSF was 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Though it remains uncertain whether the encouraging response activity observed in this disease-oriented Phase I study was, in fact, due to successful modulation of multidrug resistance, these results suggest that this regimen is likely to be an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer, which should be evaluated further.     

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Radiotherapy and concomitant weekly 1-hour infusion of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer--results from a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel (PAC) given as a 1-h I.V. infusion in patients with head and neck cancer concomitant to irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head and neck cancer were enrolled into a prospective, dose-escalating Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the WHO toxicity score. MTD dose was defined when two out of six patients developed DLT. The starting dose of PAC was 20 mg/m2 once weekly I.V. over 60 min, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of three new patients. Radiation therapy was administered in three field technique over 6-7 weeks in 2.0 Gy/daily fractions for 5 consecutive days/week up to total doses of 60-70 Gy. RESULTS: From 1994-1996, 18 patients completing three dose levels were included into the study. Altogether, 101 courses of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity. On the second dose level (30 mg/m2) one of three patients experienced DLT with Grade IV mucositis. On the next dose level with 40 mg/m2 PAC weekly one patient experienced DLT being prolonged Grade III mucositis. From the following three patients required, two patients showed no DLT. The third patient showed mucositis of WHO Grade 4 and died from hemorrhage caused by a rupture of the a pharyngeal wall. Dose level 2 (30 mg/m2) was repeated and one of the three newly treated patients again suffered from mucositis WHO Grade 4. CONCLUSION: When PAC is given weekly as a 1-h infusion concomitant to radiotherapy, MTD is 30 mg/m2 with mucositis being DLT; hematological and further nonhematological toxicity is mild.     

Intensified adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy: a dose-finding study for ambulatory patients with breast cancer

Escalating doses of cyclophosphamide were given every 3 weeks as adjuvant treatment for women operated for breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given with constant doses of methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2; CMF) as an outpatient treatment without the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF). The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 250 mg/m2 starting from the dose of 1,000 mg/m2. Mesna was given to prevent cystitis. The criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were grade IV granulocytopenia lasting for longer than 48 h, granulocytopenic infection or other grade IV toxicities. G-CSF and ofloxacin were used if grade IV granulocytopenia continued for longer than 48 h or if granulocytopenic infection occurred. At the dose level of 1,500 mg/m2 (500 mg/m2/week) 22 (92%) of the 24 patients had grade IV granulocytopenia during the 6 CMF cycles given, but only 3 (13%) had granulocytopenic fever. G-CSF was used in 28% of the cycles at this dose level. Other toxicities included complete alopecia (79%), nausea and vomiting. Sixteen (80%) of the premenopausal women became postmenopausal. At the dose level of 1,750 mg/m2 all 3 patients treated had to be hospitalized after the first cycle due to neutropenic infection (n = 2) or intractable vomiting even though prophylactic G-CSF was used. We conclude that intravenous CMF with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1,500 mg/m2 given at 3-week intervals with the selective use of prophylactic G-CSF is feasible as adjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer

This is a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer patients. The patients, refractory to the PELF regimen (5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin), received weekly 5-FU at the fixed dose of 500 mg/m2, and escalating doses of paclitaxel every 3 weeks with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 given as in 3-h infusion. The dose was escalated by 25 mg/m2 every 3 patients. Fifteen patients entered the study. The upper paclitaxel dose (225 mg/m2) was given to 6 patients. Up to this dose, no severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was recorded. Apart from alopecia, grade 1-2 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients and grade 1-2 neurotoxicity in 2 patients. All patients were evaluable for response (at least 2 cycles): 2 patients achieved an objective response (200 and 225 mg/m2). In 6 patients, treatment resulted in notable relief from symptoms. Out-patient paclitaxel given over 3 h and 5-FU may be combined safely for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. The recommended doses for phase II study are paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and 5-FU 500 mg/m2.     

Phosphatidyl serine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody is exclusive to patients with lupus anticoagulant

In attempt to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen including carboplatin (CBDCA), epirubicin (EPI), and VP-16 in extensive small cell lung cancer, with a higher dose intensity compared with previous experience of our group, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VP-16 when administered in association with CBDCA (300 mg/ m2, i.v., day 1) and EPI (75 mg/m2, i.v., day 1), recycling chemotherapy every 3 weeks, with the support of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A total of 15 patients received three dose levels of VP-16 (mg/m2, i.v., daily on days 1-3): 100 (three patients), 120 (six), and 140 (six). G-CSF was administered subcutaneously at the dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day on days 6-15 of each chemotherapy course. The MTD was established at 140 mg/m2 and myelotoxicity, grade 4 neutropenia with death for sepsis in one case and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three cases, was dose limiting. The recommended dose of VP-16 for a phase II study is 140 mg/m2.     

Pharmacokinetic re-evaluation and phase I study of high dose epirubicin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We performed a phase I trial to evaluate the toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of high dose epirubicin on a three-consecutive-day schedule on Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Fourteen patients were entered in the study. At least three patients were assigned to each different dose level. Epirubicin was given intravenously daily for three day by bolus injection. The dose was started at 60 mg/m2/course and escalated by 30 mg/m2/course. Granulocytopenia was found to be the dose limiting toxicity with a maximum tolerated dose of 150 mg/m2/course. Thrombocytopenia and non-hematological toxicities were mild and well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose was lower than that in Europe and Canada. Partial responses were observed in two out of five patients on 150 mg/m2/course. The recommended phase II dose for high dose epirubicin was demonstrated to be 120 mg/m2/course. A further dose-escalating study of epirubicin in conjunction with the administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor is scheduled for the determination of its antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin), a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumours

Topotecan is a specific inhibitor to topoisomerase I. An oral formulation of topotecan is available with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans. A phase I and pharmacological study of the oral formulation of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was performed in adult patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adult patients with a WHO performance status < or = 2 adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions, with malignant solid tumours refractory to standard forms were entered into the study. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic assay. 29 patients entered the study, all patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses studied in the 29 patients were 1.2, 1.8, 2.3, 2.7 mg/m2/day and a fixed dose of 4 mg/day without surface area adjustment. A total of 109 courses were given. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 2.7 mg/m2/day and consisted of CTC (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria) grade IV granulocytopenia. The regimen was well tolerated. Non-haematological toxicities were mild, including fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in white blood cells versus the area under the curve (AUC(t)) of topotecan lactone (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) which was modelled by a sigmoidal Emax function. The correlation coefficient between the absolute topotecan dose administered and the AUC(t) was R = 0.52 (P = 0.04). Pharmacokinetics of the fixed dose of 4 mg/day were comparable to the 2.3 mg/m2/day dose. DLT in this phase I study of five daily doses of oral topotecan every 21 days was granulocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 2.3 mg/m2/day or alternatively, a fixed dose of 4 mg/day.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of seronegative sacroiliitis

A total of 27 patients with advanced previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with paclitaxel and ifosfamide. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given for 3 h by intravenous infusion on day 1. Ifosfamide 4 g/m2 was given for 4 h by intravenous infusion on day 2. Dosage of the two drugs was modified according to nadir white blood count after each cycle. Involved in the treatment were 17 males and 10 female patients. The median age was 61 years (range 47-71 years) and the median Karnofsky performance status was 70% (range 60-90%), 13 cases were stage IIIb and 14 cases were stage IV. One case was not evaluable due to lost follow-up after a single dose of chemotherapy. There were five cases not determined due to a timing error. Of 21 evaluable cases, eight achieved partial response (PR 38%, confidence interval 18.1-61.5%), seven achieved stable disease, two had a minor response. The median survival time of the whole group was 255 days (range from 38 to 567 days). The major toxicities were myalgia; arthralgia and neuropathies. Throughout the study, only three cases (15%) were treated at dose level 0. After the first cycle, 18 cases were treated at dose level 1, after a second cycle, 13 cases were treated at dose level 2. Three cases with grade 3 leukopenia were seen at dose level 0. At dose level 1, two cases had grade 3 leukopenia. At dose level 2, four episodes of grade 3 leukopenia were noted. It is concluded that paclitaxel can be combined safely with ifosfamide at these dosage levels. The response rates were comparable to the other chemotherapy combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The survival results were acceptable and comparable to the cisplatin-containing regimen. This study indicates that combinations of paclitaxel and/or ifosfamide with other agents, such as gemcitabine and vinorelbine, should be explored.     

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of ipriflavone in healthy volunteers at steady-state. Evaluation of two different dosage schemes

Because of the relative lack of overlapping toxicity, carboplatin (PPL) and cisplatin (CDDP) can be easily combined for treatment of ovarian cancer to increase total platinum dose intensity. Ifosfamide (IFO), one of the most effective single agents in ovarian cancer, has a low hematological toxicity when administered in continuous infusion. From January 1991 to December 1993, 34 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated with chemo- or radiotherapy, were enrolled in a phase I-II study with the aim of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CDDP (on day 8 of a 28-day cycle) in combination with PPL (300 mg/m2 on day 1) and IFO (4,000 mg/m2/24 h by continuous infusion on day 1). The initial dose level of CDDP was 40 mg/m2, which was continuously increased by 10 mg/m2 up to the MTD defined as one dose level below that inducing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least two-thirds of treated patients; no dose escalation was allowed in the same patient. Grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 54 and 49% of patients, respectively. The DLT was reached at 70 mg/m2 and therefore the dose recommended for the phase II study was 60 mg/m2. Complete (CR) plus partial response was observed in 88% of patients with a 21% pathological CR. With a minimum follow-up of 32 months (median 40 months), median progression-free survival and overall survival were 21 and 39 months, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of CDDP, PPL, and IFO provides an effective regimen for ovarian cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Phase I multicenter study of combined high-dose ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Swiss Group for Clinical Research (SAKK)

Ifosfamide and doxorubicin are the most active agents in the treatment of sarcomas and are characterized by a marked dose-response relationship. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of both agents in combination under granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cover. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with untreated sarcomas (soft tissue: n = 20; gynecological: n = 11; bone: n = 2) were treated with ifosfamide 12 g/m2 by continuous i.v. infusion over five days and doxorubicin with dose escalation from 50 mg/m2 i.v. bolus divided on two days, then to 60 mg/m2 bolus divided on three days. Ifosfamide was reduced to 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin was further escalated up to 90 mg/m2. GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously) was started 24 hours after chemotherapy and continued for 10 days. RESULTS: The MTD was reached with the combination of ifosfamide at 12 g/m2 and doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2. But with ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 the MTD was not obtained. While severe leukopenia and granulopenia were observed at all-dose levels, severe anemia was more frequently related to the highest dose of ifosfamide. Severe thrombopenia and mucositis were more commonly observed at the highest dose of doxorubicin. Ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 induced WHO grade 4 leukopenia in 58%, grade 3-4 thrombopenia in 42%, and anemia in 31% of cycles. Mucositis was minor in 50% of cycles. The overall response rate among 31 evaluable patients was 55% (95 confidence interval (CI): 36%-73%), with four (13%) complete responders and 13 (42%) partial responders. Response rates based on soft-tissue sarcomas or gynecological sarcomas alone were similar. Ten patients could be treated by elective surgery and/or radiotherapy. The total group of patients reached a median survival of two years, with 25% (SE 8%) survivors after three years. CONCLUSIONS: The dose level of ifosfamide 10 g/m2 and doxorubicin 90 mg/m2 with supportive GM-CSF is manageable in a multicenter setting and should be further tested in regular phase II trials, including patients with gynecological and soft-tissue sarcomas. Transient toxicity with myelosuppression should be accepted in order to obtain a high antitumor activity of this regimen and a potential improvement in survival.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

High-dose epirubicin is not an alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group

The activity and toxicity of single-agent standard-dose doxorubicin were compared with that of two schedules of high-dose epirubicin. A total of 334 chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced soft-tissue sarcomas received (A) doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 (112 patients), (B) epirubicin 150 mg m(-2) on day 1 (111 patients) or (C) epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day(-1) on days 1, 2 and 3 (111 patients); all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. A median of four treatment cycles was given. Median age was 52 years (19-70 years) and performance score 1 (0-2). Of 314 evaluable patients, 45 (14%) had an objective tumour response (eight complete response, 35 partial response). There were no differences among the three groups. Median time to progression for groups A, B and C was 16, 14 and 12 weeks, and median survival 45, 47 and 45 weeks respectively. Neither progression-free (P = 0.93) nor overall survival (P = 0.89) differed among the three groups. After the first cycle of therapy, two patients died of infection and one owing to cardiovascular disease, all on epirubicin. Both dose schedules of epirubicin were more myelotoxic than doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity (> or = grade 3) occurred in 1%, 0% and 2% respectively. Regardless of the schedule, high-dose epirubicin is not a preferred alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.     

Analysis of FMR1 and flanking microsatellite markers in normal and fragile X chromosomes in Portugal: evidence for a "protector" haplotype

The authors evaluate the combination of three drugs, vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, which have been shown to produce good response rates and a significant gain in survival when any two of them are given together. Seventy-seven untreated patients with inoperable stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer from three centers were included. The combination consisted of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 daily, ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m2 daily, mesna 1,500 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1 and 8. Four cycles were administered every 4 weeks for a total of 267 cycles, before an assessment for toxicity, effective dose intensity, response rate, and survival was made. Toxicity was mainly hematologic (grade 3-4 neutropenia (15.7%), anemia (8.2%), and thrombopenia (2.6%)) but did not require granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Objective response rate was 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 29.5-52.9%) in 68 patients suitable for assessment. The mean time to progression and median survival were 7.7 +/- 1.3 months and 11.6 months, respectively. One-year survival was 47.1%. The effective dose intensity of cisplatin and ifosfamide correlated strongly with survival, whereas stage and performance status did not. This study confirms previously reported favorable results for response and survival rates obtained in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer with the vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination. Respect of a scheduled dose intensity has a clear-cut influence on survival and should be evaluated routinely in future polychemotherapy trials.     

Ifosfamide and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the novel combination of ifosfamide (IFX) and vinorelbine (VNB) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Between March 1993 and November 1994, 44 patients (17 stage IIIB; 27 stage IV) received a regimen consisting of IFX, 2 g/m2 in a 1-h infusion, days 1-3; mesna, 400 mg/m2 in an i.v. bolus at hours 0 and 4 and 800 mg orally at hour 8, days 1-3; and VNB, 35 mg/ m2 in a 20-min infusion, days 1 and 15. During the first course only, a half dose of VNB (17.5 mg/m2) was administered on days 8 and 22. Courses were repeated every 28 days. Forty patients were fully evaluable for response, and 44 were assessable for toxicity. Objective regression was recorded in 13 of 40 patients (33%). No patient achieved a complete response. Thirteen patients presented a partial response (33%); 17 (42%) had no change; and progressive disease was observed in 10 (25%). The median duration of response was 10 months, and the median time to treatment failure for the whole group was 4 months. Median survival was 11 months. The dose-limiting toxic effect was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 25 patients (57%) and was grade 3 or 4 in 8 patients (18%). Twelve patients (27%) developed peripheral neurotoxicity, while five had mild IFX-induced CNS toxicity. Phlebitis was observed in 15 of 30 patients (50%) who did not have central implantable venous systems. The IFX-VNB combination exhibited an activity against NSCLC that was among the highest reported for non-cisplatin-containing regimens, with a toxicity profile that was easily managed.     

Maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity, and efficacy of (131)I-Lym-1 antibody for fractionated radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE: Lym-1, a monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets malignant lymphocytes, has induced remissions in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) when labeled with iodine 131 ((131)I). Based on the strategy of fractionating the total dose, this study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of the first two, of a maximum of four, doses of (131)I-Lym-1 given 4 weeks apart. Additionally, toxicity and radiation dosimetry were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with advanced NHL entered the study a total of 21 times. Thirteen (62%) of the 21 entries had diffuse large-cell histologies. All patients had disease resistant to standard therapy and had received a mean of four chemotherapy regimens. (131)I-Lym-1 was given after Lym-1 and (131)I was escalated in cohorts of patients from 40 to 100 mCi (1.5 to 3.7 GBq)/m2 body surface area. RESULTS: Mean radiation dose to the bone marrow from body and blood (131)I was 0.34 (range, 0. 1 6 to 0.63) rad/mCi (0.09 mGy/MBq; range, 0.04 to 0.17 mGy/ MBq). Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia with an MTD of 100 mCi/m2 (3.7 GBq/m2) for each of the first two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 given 4 weeks apart. Nonhematologic toxicities did not exceed grade 2 except for one instance of grade 3 hypotension. Ten (71 %) of 14 entries who received at least two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 therapy and 11 (52%) of 21 total entries responded. Seven of the responses were complete, with a mean duration of 14 months. All three entries in the 100 mCi/m2 (3.7 MBq/m2) cohort had complete remissions (CRs). All responders had at least a partial remission (PR) after the first therapy dose of (131)I-Lym-1. CONCLUSION: (131)I-Lym-1 induced durable remissions in patients with NHL resistant to chemotherapy and was associated with acceptable toxicity. The nonmyeloablative MTD for each of the first two doses of (131)I-Lym-1 was 100 mCi/m2 (total, 200 mCi/m2) (3.7 GBq/m2; total, 7.4 GBq/m2).     

Acute myocardial infarction in a patient during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatments appear to yield better results in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than radiotherapy alone. The optimal induction chemotherapy regimen remains to be established. In the present study, chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine was used prior to radical radiotherapy in Stage III-B NSCLC. Thirty-three patients were entered prospectively into a Phase II study. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, followed by thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy). Twenty-two percent of the 33 patients had grade 3-4 leukopenia, and there were six episodes (in 4 patients) of neutropenia-associated fever. Gastrointestinal toxicity was generally moderate. Peripheral neuropathy was present in 42% of the patients, although in most of them it was slight. The main radiotherapy toxicity was esophagitis grade I-II. Evaluation of response after the third chemotherapy course showed an objective response in 16 patients (48%), whereas in three patients (9%) the disease progressed during therapy. The median survival of the entire group was 13 months. Cisplatin plus vinorelbine followed by radiotherapy is an effective schedule for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.