The effect of felodipine on renal function and blood pressure in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients during the first three months after transplantation

BACKGROUND: Due to their vasodilatory effect, calcium antagonist may have a renoprotective against cyclosporin (CsA)-induced nephrotoxicity and rise in blood pressure (BP) seen in renal transplantation. METHODS: In order to evaluate the effect of the calcium antagonist felodipine on renal function and BP during cyclosporin treatment, 79 CsA-treated renal transplant recipients were investigated during the first 3 months after transplantation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with two parallel groups. Felodipine (ER tablets, 10 mg) or placebo was given prior to transplantation and each day during the study period. The patients were assessed twice, i.e. at 4-6 weeks and at 10-12 weeks after transplantation. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured by constant infusion technique. Tubular function was estimated from clearance of lithium. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after transplantation, felodipine caused a significantly higher RPF [felodipine: 219 +/- 70 ml/min; placebo: 182+/-56 ml/min (mean+/-1 SD); P=0.03]. No differences were found in GFR, filtration fraction (FF), tubular sodium handling, or sodium excretion. Felodipine lowered BP significantly. At 12 weeks after transplantation, felodipine caused a significantly higher GFR (felodipine: 49+/-18 ml/min; placebo: 40+/-16 ml/min; P=0.05) and RPF (felodipine: 225+/-77 ml/min; placebo: 175+/-48 ml/min; P<0.01). No difference was found in FF. Felodipine lowered BP significantly. No differences were found with regard to duration of primary anuria, hospitalization time, number of rejection episodes, plasma creatinine day 7 post-transplant, or treatment doses of CsA. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that in renal transplant recipients treated with CsA, felodipine significantly increased both GFR and RPF 3 months after transplantation when compared with placebo, despite a concomitant lowering of BP. A possible antagonizing affect of felodipine against CsA-induced nephrotoxicity in these patients is suggested.     

Converting-enzyme inhibitor versus calcium antagonist in cyclosporine-treated renal transplants

The influence of antihypertensive treatment on the long-term evolution of arterial pressure and renal function was studied in a prospective controlled trial conducted in renal transplant recipients treated by cyclosporine. Within six months after transplantation, patients were randomly allocated to treatment by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril (ACEI, alone or associated with frusemide; N = 14), or the calcium antagonist, nifedipine (CA, alone or associated with atenolol; N = 11). Glomerular filtration rate (TcDTPA clearance) and effective renal plasma flow (hippuran clearance) as well as 24-hour urinary excretion of electrolytes and albumin were estimated at about 1 and 2.5 years of follow-up. Before initiation of antihypertensive therapy, the two groups were similar with regards to mean arterial pressure (119 +/- 2 vs. 120 +/- 4 mm Hg), effective renal plasma flow (285 +/- 26 vs. 248 +/- 33 ml/min/1.73 m2) and glomerular filtration rate (59 +/- 4 vs. 61 +/- 8 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the ACEI and CA groups, respectively). Both ACEI and CA treatments were associated with no change in renal function, a similar change in mean arterial pressure (ACEI -18 +/- 3; CA -13 +/- 5 mm Hg) and identical trough blood levels of cyclosporine. Urinary albumin excretion did not change significantly in any groups. Of interest, only in the ACEI group did filtration fraction significantly decrease (from 0.22 +/- 0.01% to 0.19 +/- 0.01% at final studies). These results indicate that in cyclosporine-treated transplant recipients, a satisfactory control of hypertension is obtained by chronic ACEI, which is as effective on arterial pressure as a combination of CA and atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Production of less chronic nephrotoxicity by cyclosporine G than cyclosporine A in a low-salt rat model

Chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy during long-term cyclosporine A (CsA) use has led to a search for equally effective but safer analogues. In this study we evaluated one of these analogues, cyclosporine G (CsG), in a rat model of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. CsG has immunosuppressive effects equivalent to CsA when dosed on a weight basis. Pair-fed Sprague-Dawley rats kept on a low-salt rice diet were given CsA 15 mg/kg, CsG 15 mg/kg, CsG 25 mg/kg, or vehicle subcutaneously. After 21 days, CsA animals had a lower glomerular filtration rate, measured by inulin clearance (0.16 +/- 0.04 ml/min/100 g) and higher serum creatinine (0.94 +/- 0.06 mg/dl) than CsG 15 mg/kg (GFR: 0.41 +/- 0.10 ml/min/100 g and serum creatinine: 0.68 +/- 0.09 mg/dl), CsG 25 mg/kg (GFR: 0.39 +/- 0.16 ml/min/100 g) or control rats (GFR: 0.62 +/- 0.06 ml/min/100 g; serum creatinine: 0.56 +/- 0.03 mg/dl), respectively (P < 0.05). The CsA group had considerable cortical and medullary injury (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy), whereas both groups of CsG animals had more limited changes. Despite the same or larger doses of CsG on a weight basis, cyclosporine blood levels were significantly lower in CsG than CsA rats. We conclude that CsG, an analogue of cyclosporine with immunosuppressive activity equivalent to that of CsA, produced less nephrotoxicity in a model of chronic renal injury in rats, using both functional and structural parameters.     

Acute effects of nifedipine in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine or azathioprine

Cyclosporine (CsA) impairs renal function, probably by preglomerular vasoconstriction. Vasodilating substances may therefore be of benefit to ameliorate CsA-induced renal dysfunction. We studied the acute effects on blood pressure and renal function of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine (10 mg orally) in 20 CsA-treated renal transplant patients. In addition, we compared the effects of nifedipine when given immediately before and 4 weeks after elective conversion from CsA to azathioprine. Compared with placebo (n = 14), administration of nifedipine led to a significant decrease in blood pressure and a strong natriuretic and diuretic response. Despite the reduction in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate improved from 60 +/- 20 (mean +/- SD) to 69 +/- 24 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) and renal plasma flow (RPF) increased from 260 +/- 87 to 338 +/- 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). The combination of a decreased blood pressure with an increased RPF was reflected in a sharp decrease in renal vascular resistance (0.34 +/- 0.18 units v 0.23 +/- 0.10 units; P < 0.001). The conversion from CsA to azathioprine by itself led to significant increases in glomerular filtration rate (62 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 v 76 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.05) and RPF (280 +/- 86 mL/min/1.73 m2 v 334 +/- 66 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.05). During treatment with azathioprine an effect of nifedipine on glomerular filtration rate and RPF was no longer observed, although the natriuretic effect was similar on both occasions. The decrease in renal vascular resistance was larger during treatment with CsA than during treatment with azathioprine (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term improvement in renal function after cyclosporine reduction in renal transplant recipients with histologically proven chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine (CsA) nephropathy, which has been unequivocally documented in recipients of heart, heart-lung, liver, or bone marrow transplants, as well as in nontransplant situations, usually results in a progressive deterioration of renal function. In this study, we assessed the potential reversibility of chronic CsA nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three renal transplant patients with biopsy-proven CsA nephropathy associated with long-term CsA administration (27+/-4 months) were followed up for more than 2 years after CsA reduction (18/23 patients) or withdrawal (5/23 patients) and addition of azathioprine. Changes in effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were assessed before and 2 years after CsA reduction, whereas serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, and CsA concentrations were monitored up to 5 years. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, glomerular filtration rate increased from 40+/-3 to 47+/-4 (P<0.05) and effective renal plasma flow from 217+/-23 to 244+/-24 ml/min/1.73 m2 (NS). Mean arterial pressure significantly decreased from 98.7+/-2.9 to 93.1+/-2.7 mmHg (P<0.05). There was no significant change in renal vascular resistance, filtration fraction, or albumin excretion. A significant decrease in serum creatinine was also observed during the whole follow-up (73+/-6.5 months). CsA reduction was followed by only one episode of acute reversible rejection; chronic rejection developed in three patients 2 years or later after CsA reduction. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CsA nephropathy participates in graft dysfunction in a small group of renal transplant recipients. In addition, graft dysfunction may be reversible when CsA dosage is reduced early after diagnosis of chronic CsA nephropathy.     

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and chronic cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction in type 1 diabetes

AIM: This study was designed to evaluate whether the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril could prevent cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction in diabetic patients treated with CsA in monotherapy. DESIGN: Twenty-four recent onset insulin-dependent diabetic patients without prior renal involvement were randomized to receive a 3 month course of either cyclosporine (CsA) alone (7.5 mg/kg. b.i.d. in olive oil) or CsA+enalapril (20mg p.o. oad.). END POINTS: were mean arterial pressure, plasma creatinine, GFR, renal plasma flow, renal vascular resistance, sodium and lithium clearances measured before and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Baseline values were identical in both groups except for mean arterial pressure which was slightly higher in the subjects subsequently receiving CsA + enalapril. Three month treatment with CsA increased significantly mean arterial pressure and renal vascular resistance by 9 and 24% respectively, while decreasing significantly glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow by 17 and 14% respectively. Enalapril was able to prevent the decline in GFR and the increase in blood pressure induced by CsA. This effect was demonstrated despite a similar increase in renal vascular resistance suggesting a dissociation between changes in glomerular filtration rate and renal vascular resistance during angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibition. CONCLUSION: Chronic angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibition could afford some degree of protection against CsA-induced renal dysfunction. Whether these results can be extrapolated to transplant recipients in whom CsA is usually associated to treatment by glucocorticosteroids deserves further evaluation.     

Quality of life before and during antihypertensive treatment: a comparative study of celiprolol and atenolol

BACKGROUND: The well-being of hypertensive patients may be adversely affected by the disease itself, its complications, and other concomitant processes such as anxiety, sedation, and side effects of the prescribed drugs. Some recently developed antihypertensive agents have been suggested to be devoid of these deleterious effects on well-being expressed as quality of life. OBJECT: We compared the effect on quality of life of a standard cardioselective beta-blocker atenolol to the effect of celiprolol as a representative of a new class of selective beta-blockers with vasodilatory properties. One-hundred-thirty-two patients with mild to moderate hypertension were eligible to enter a 28-week double-blind parallel-group study, consisting of a 4-week run-in period on placebo and a 24-week period on dosage-adjusted treatment with either atenolol or celiprolol. RESULTS: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were assessed, as was quality of life perception by a selected test battery including the Quality of Life Questionnaire of Bulpitt and Fletcher [1990]. During celiprolol treatment, supine blood pressure fell from 167/101 (range 120-200/95-116) to 150/92 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). This antihypertensive effect was at least as good with celiprolol as with atenolol. Quality of life perception was comparable for the 2 drugs, although some adverse effects were more frequent during atenolol than during celiprolol, particularly after prolonged treatment. Also patient compliance was better for celiprolol than for atenolol. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the selective beta-blocker with vasodilatory property celiprolol is at least as effective as atenolol and that it has additional advantage in terms of enhancement of some quality of life variables.     

Long-term renal function in heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine therapy

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression with cyclosporine has improved allograft function and reduced both morbidity and mortality in organ transplantation. However, cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity still is a concern. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of cyclosporine on renal function in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who received transplants from 1985 to 1991 and had at least three yearly glomerular filtration rate measurements posttransplantation by 125I-iothalamate clearance method were included in the study. In addition, serum creatinine (before and after transplantation) and cyclosporine doses were analyzed. RESULTS: Maintenance immunosuppression at 1 year consisted of prednisone (0.1 mg/kg/day), azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day), and cyclosporine (12-hour trough level 100 to 150 ng/ml by fluorescence polarization immunoassay). The mean serum creatinine at 1 year was significantly higher than the mean pretransplantation serum creatinine (1.51 +/- 0.32 versus 1.28 +/- 0.38, p < 0.05) and stabilized after the first year. The mean glomerular filtration rate by 125I-iothalamate clearance method was 70.6 +/- 20.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 32 to 105) at 1 year and remained relatively stable during the follow-up period of up to 7 years. Creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula overestimated the true glomerular filtration rate after the third year. The mean cyclosporine dosage was significantly lower after the first-year dose of 3.9 +/- 1.8 mg/kg/day (p < 0.05). Three patients in 39 started hemodialysis at 5, 7, and 10 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the adequacy of renal function is preserved with long-term cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients.     

Effects of cyclosporin A withdrawal on renal function and renal stimulation in liver transplant patients treated with triple-drug immunosuppression for over 2 years

The influence of CsA withdrawal on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) was prospectively studied in nine stable liver transplant recipients. Before CsA withdrawal (test 1), and 6 months thereafter (test 2) the renal function was determined by measuring GFR and the ERPF with 125I-iothalamate and 131I-hippuran respectively. The renal function was also stimulated with dopamine, with an amino-acid infusion and a combination of both. After CsA withdrawal the GFR increased, median from 74 ml min-1 to 90 ml min-1, (P < 0.04). The ERPF also increased, median from 310 ml min-1 to 380 ml min-1, (P < 0.03). In test 1 as well as in test 2 the renal function could be stimulated, especially with dopamine. GFR and ERPF improved, even after more than 2 years of CsA treatment. These results suggest that long-term CsA treatment impairs the renal function, though in these liver transplant patients CsA treatment did not prevent afferent and efferent arteriolar vasodilatation after renal stimulation. This reversible intrarenal vasoconstriction during CsA treatment may predict renal improvement after CsA withdrawal.     

A randomized controlled trial of verapamil on cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in heart and lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressive drug widely used in organ transplantation and in the treatment of autoimmune diseases (1, 2). However, its common nephrotoxic effect is a major limiting factor. Short-term CsA treatment has been shown to cause reversible renal vasoconstriction, whereas long-term treatment can lead to an afferent arteriolopathy and chronic renal failure. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial to examine the short-term renal effects of verapamil in 32 CsA-treated heart or lung transplant recipients. Sixteen patients each were randomized to receive a 6-week course of verapamil or control treatment (atenolol in hypertensive patients and placebo in normotensive patients) 1-2 months after transplantation. An 8-hr sequential clearance study of inulin and p-aminohippuric acid for estimating glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow, respectively, was performed at baseline and at completion of study. The integral area under the curve of the clearance parameter over 8 hr was then calculated to generate a clearance-time index. RESULTS: There was no difference in the clearance-time indices for inulin and p-aminohippuric acid between the two groups at baseline. However, at the completion of study, the within-group change in the glomerular filtration rate clearance-time index was different between the verapamil and control groups (48+/-20 vs. -35+/-17 ml/min/1.73 m2 x hr, respectively; P=0.0038). A similar trend was seen for renal plasma flow, but did not reach statistical significance. Mean arterial blood pressure and whole-blood CsA levels did not differ between the two groups during the study. Verapamil treatment was also associated with a decrease in CsA dose requirement (7.6+/-0.58 mg/kg/day at baseline vs. 4.6+/-0.40 mg/kg/day at completion; P<0.001) without any significant change in trough whole blood CsA levels. Rejection episodes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of verapamil in the heart or lung transplant recipients may therefore provide both renal protective effects and cost savings.     

Caspases mediate tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced neutrophil apoptosis and downregulation of reactive oxygen production

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CSA) has improved patients and organ-graft survival rates, but its chronic nephrotoxicity is still an issue. Although prolonged vasoconstriction could contribute to chronic CsA tubulointerstitial changes by producing chronic ischemia, this relationship has been difficult to demonstrate thus far, and cellular origin and mediators of these structural alterations remain ill-defined. METHODS: As a part of a clinical trial in kidney transplant recipients on triple immunosuppressive therapy (CsA, azathioprine and steroid), which includes renal biopsy as "per protocol," 22 patients enrolled between 12 and 24 months posttransplantation underwent renal hemodynamic evaluation by measuring glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow by the plasma clearance of unlabeled iohexol and the renal clearance of para-aminohippuric acid, respectively. In parallel, the CsA pharmacokinetic profile was also determined. A week later, a protocol biopsy of kidney graft was performed. Light microscopy examination and localization of endothelin-1, RANTES, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression by in situ hybridization in the graft specimens were evaluated and related to the pattern of histologic lesions. RESULTS: Ten out of 22 kidney transplant recipients who underwent the protocol biopsy had CsA nephrotoxicity, eight had chronic rejection, and four had no lesions at histological examination. The total daily exposure to CsA was higher in patients with CsA nephrotoxicity than in those with chronic rejection or no lesions at biopsy. Renal function was preserved in the CsA toxicity group as compared with the chronic rejection group, despite some degree of renal hypoperfusion. Tubular atrophy and striped interstitial fibrosis were found in all patients with light microscopical evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity, whereas glomerular and arteriolar lesions were less frequent. Intense staining for endothelin-1, RANTES, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNAs selectively localized at tubular epithelial cells was found in biopsies taken from patients with CsA nephrotoxicity, but not in the chronic graft rejection group, whose tubuli had only minimal staining for RANTES mRNA on a few occasions. CONCLUSION: Long-term CsA administration to kidney allograft recipients leads to tubulointerstitial injury independently of its vascular effect. The possible contribution to the development of interstitial fibrosis of inflammatory and growth factors released by tubular cells in which CsA accumulates is proposed.     

Low-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with suboptimal renal function

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity can be identified by functional changes and chronic renal damage. CsA-associated renal fibrosis has been related to the overproduction of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, a fibrogenic cytokine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dose reduction without increasing the risk of rejection. METHODS: We studied the impact of CsA dose reduction in association with MMF on renal function and TGF-beta1, production in 16 long-term renal allograft recipients with suspected CsA nephrotoxicity. Two grams/day of MMF were introduced, and CsA dose was reduced to reach whole-blood levels between 40 and 60 ng/ml within 1 month. CsA dose and levels, renal function parameters, and platelet-poor plasma TGF-beta1 levels were evaluated before and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: MMF allowed a decrease in both the mean dose of CsA (3.8+/-1.35 vs. 2.2+/-0.73 mg/kg/day; P<0.01) and CsA levels (148+/-36 vs. 53+/-19 ng/ml; P<0.001). The reduction of CsA was associated with a decrement of serum creatinine levels (210+/-46 vs. 172+/-41 micromol/L; P<0.001) and an increase in both the glomerular filtration rate (32.9+/-12 vs. 39.1+/-14 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02) and renal plasma flow (195+/-79 to 218.6+/-74.02 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02). There was a reduction in plasma TGF-beta1 levels (4.6+/-4.2 vs. 2.0+/-1.4 ng/ml; P=0.003) and CsA levels correlated with TGF-beta1 (r=0.536, P=0.002). No rejection episodes occurred, and an improvement in both systolic (149+/-13 vs. 137+/-12 mmHg; P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (89+/-14 vs. 83+/-10 mmHg; P<0.04) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These short-term results show that MMF introduction allows a CsA dose reduction, which improves renal function, reduces TGF-beta1 production, and improves the control of hypertension, without increasing the incidence of acute rejection.     

Comparison between the effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on proteinuria in nondiabetic renal failure: a double-blind, randomized prospective study

Double-blind, randomized controlled studies of longer than 1 week in duration comparing the antiproteinuric potential of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with that of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are lacking. Therefore, we performed such a study in patients with nondiabetic renal disease and proteinuria. After a 4-week wash-out period in which patients did not use any medication known to affect proteinuria, 21 patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either the calcium channel blocker amlodipine (Amlo, 5 to 10 mg) or the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril (Lis, 5 to 10 mg). Throughout the 16-week study period, blood pressure, creatinine clearances, and proteinuria were measured every 2 weeks. In addition, device-measured blood pressure and renal hemodynamic studies were performed at the start and end of the study. Systolic blood pressure fell in the Lis group from 163+/-7 (SEM) to 140+/-8 mm Hg (P < .01) and from 157+/-10 to 147+/-6 mm Hg in the Amlo group; diastolic blood pressure fell from 101+/-3 to 86+/-7 mm Hg in the Lis group and from 98+/-3 to 91+/-2 mm Hg in the Amlo group. Renal hemodynamics were not affected by amlodipine treatment, whereas a fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was seen in lisinopril-treated patients (from 55+/-11 to 50+/-10 mL/min; P < .01). Amlodipine did not significantly affect proteinuria. Lisinopril induced a decline in the protein-creatinine ratio with a maximal effect reached after 12 to 16 weeks of therapy (from 0.39+/-0.17 to 0.26 +/-0.11 g/mmol; P < .009). In conclusion, we could not demonstrate an antiproteinuric effect of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine, whereas therapy with the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril resulted in a decrease in proteinuria. Amlodipine did not affect renal hemodynamics, whereas lisinopril induced a fall in GFR.     

Cyclosporin does not inhibit the tubular secretion of creatinine

BACKGROUND: The immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin is known to impair renal function. The degree of renal dysfunction is usually estimated from the clearance of creatinine (CCr). Theoretically however, a fall in CCr can be caused by a decrease of GFR, an inhibition of the tubular secretion of creatinine, or the combination of both. CsA has convincingly been shown to decrease GFR, but detailed information on the effects of CsA on tubular secretion of creatinine is lacking. METHODS: We performed two studies to investigate the influence of CsA on tubular creatinine secretion. In study A we simultaneously measured CCr and GFR (using inulin) immediately before and 4 weeks after cessation of CsA therapy in 17 renal transplant patients. In study B, the rise in serum creatinine after administration of cimetidine, which blocks the tubular secretion of creatinine, was compared in renal transplant patients treated with either CsA (in whom secretion might already be inhibited) or azathioprine. RESULTS: Study A: After cessation of CsA there was an increase of GFR (54+/-15 vs 63+/-16 ml/min/1.73 m2, PCr (71+/-21 vs 82+/-23 ml/min/1.73 m2; PCr and GFR (a measure of the relative contribution of tubular secretion to the clearance of creatinine) did not change significantly (1.33+/-0.21 vs 1. 32+/-0.30). Study B: In nine couples of patients matched for GFR the relative rises in serum creatinine after administration of cimetidine were 26+/-21% and 22+/-7% for CsA and azathioprine treated patients respectively (NS). CONCLUSION: CsA does not substantially inhibit the tubular secretion of creatinine. A rise in serum creatinine after administration of CsA can thus be attributed completely to a fall in GFR.     

Cyclosporine-induced hypertension and decline in renal function in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cyclosporine A (CsA; Sandimmun Neoral) on systemic and renal hemodynamics, tubular function, and sodium excretion in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we studied whether CsA enhances the systemic and renal hemodynamic sensitivity to norepinephrine. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers were administered 10 mg/kg CsA or placebo capsules in a double-blind fashion. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), renal vascular resistance (RVR), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal clearances of lithium (CLi) and sodium (CNa) were measured for 8 h after ingestion of the capsules. Norepinephrine (2 microg/kg per h) was infused intravenously for 1.5 h into nine subjects. RESULTS: CsA increased the MAP by 17+/-2 mmHg. The GFR decreased by 18+/-2% (P < 0.001) and the RVR increased by 37+/-4% (P< 0.001) after ingestion of CsA. The CsA-induced increase in MAP preceded the CsA-induced fall in GFR. The rise in MAP was followed by an early 35+/-8/0 increase in CNa (P < 0.001). At the end of the 8 h study period, CNa decreased by 25+/-7% (P < 0.001). Using CLi, it was found that the initial natriuresis had been caused by a relative decrease both in proximal and in distal tubular reabsorption of sodium, whereas the late sodium retention was secondary to the CsA-induced fall in GFR. Infusion of norepinephrine increased the MAP, RVR, and filtration fraction, and decreased the renal plasma flow, without CsA having any additional effect. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that a single oral dose of CsA caused a rise in blood pressure and transient natriuresis, followed by a fall in GFR and antinatriuresis. Thus, the present study confirms and extends earlier observations that renal dysfunction and sodium retention are not the initiating events in CsA-induced hypertension. The study also affords evidence suggesting that such rises in blood pressure are not mediated by an increased sensitivity to norepinephrine.     

Renal hemodynamics after lung transplantation. A prospective study

Renal function impairment is common after solid organ transplantation, due to the nephrotoxicity of cyclosporine. Moreover, in patients with severe respiratory failure, renal function is often impaired. This renal function impairment may predispose patients to further renal function impairment after lung transplantation. Therefore, renal hemodynamics were measured in 44 patients before lung transplantation and 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after transplantation. After transplantation, a decline in renal function occurred, with a progressive fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 33 +/- 4% at 12 months and 42 +/- 9% at 30 months. Effective renal blood flow fell by 22 +/- 5% at 12 months and remained stable thereafter. Changes in effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were less pronounced than those of effective renal blood flow, due to a fall in hematocrit after transplantation. Blood pressure and renal vascular resistance increased significantly, consistent with the effects of cyclosporine. Prior to transplantation, renal function impairment with intense renal vasoconstriction had been found in a subset of the patients. Remarkably, the decrease in renal function after transplantation was less pronounced in patients with renal function impairment prior to transplantation, as indicated by significant negative correlations between pretransplantation GFR and the percentage change in GFR after transplantation, and pretransplantation ERPF and the percentage change in ERPF after transplantation. This suggests that the net course of renal hemodynamics after lung transplantation is the result of the opposed effects of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity and the favorable effects of the normalization of respiratory status. In conclusion, after lung transplantation a decline in renal function occurs that is less pronounced in patients with renal function impairment and intense renal vasoconstriction prior to transplantation. Such a renal function impairment, therefore, should not be considered a contraindication to lung transplantation.     

A longitudinal study of vessel wall properties in normotensive and hypertensive renal transplant recipients

The mechanisms responsible for reduced arterial distensibility in renal transplant recipients remain to be evaluated. The present longitudinal study was aimed to evaluate the effect of hypertension on the evolution of vessel wall properties in renal transplant recipients. The mechanical properties of the common carotid artery were determined in 24 normotensive and 24 treated hypertensive renal transplant recipients 6-12 weeks after transplantation. The measurements were repeated after 2 years. Arterial distension was determined by using a multigate pulsed Doppler system, blood pressure (BP) was measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer. BP was 127 +/- 3/80 +/- 2 mm Hg at entry and 133 +/- 3/82 +/- 2 mm Hg after 2 years in the normotensive group, 146 +/- 4/90 +/- 3 mm Hg at entry and 145 +/- 3/87 +/- 2 mm Hg after 2 years in the hypertensive group (P < 0.01, normotensives vs hypertensives). The distensibility coefficient (DC) decreased significantly after 2 years in the hypertensive group (DC 18.3 +/- 1.3 10(-3)/kPa before, 15.1 +/- 1.2 10(-3)/kPa after 2 years, P < 0.05) whereas no significant change was observed in the normotensive group (DC 19.0 +/- 1.4 10(-3)/kPa before, DC 17.8 +/- 1.3 10(-3)/kPa after 2 years, NS). There was a significant correlation between the change of the distensibility coefficient after 2 years and mean arterial pressure (n = 48, r = 0.42, P < 0.01). The results show that the decrease of arterial distensibility after 2 years is accelerated in hypertensive renal transplant recipients despite effective anti-hypertensive treatment. Since BP levels were not different at entry into the study and after 2 years, differences in distending pressure along cannot explain the more pronounced decrease of arterial distensibility over time in hypertensive renal transplant recipients.     

Fiber growth initiation in hair follicles of goats treated with melatonin

Amphotericin B (AmB) is the drug of choice for most systemic fungal infections, but doses are frequently reduced because of nephrotoxicity. We investigated the role of thromboxane as a mediator for this nephrotoxicity. Vehicle or amphotericin (0.60 mg/kg) was infused into the left renal artery in four groups of rats, and renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured. Group 1 received vehicle for 90 min. Group 2 received vehicle followed by a 30 minute AmB infusion which caused a significant and reversible fall in the RPF and GFR. Group 3 received vehicle followed by AmB infusion, but were infused with a bolus of ibuprofen (20 mg/kg) 45 minutes before AmB. This group exhibited an insignificant attenuation in the fall in RPF and GFR. Group 4 received vehicle followed by AmB, but were infused with a bolus and continuous infusion of the thromboxane receptor antagonist SQ29,548. This group demonstrated an attenuation in the fall in RPF and a significant decrease in GFR compared to AmB control rats. In addition, the rat glomeruli were incubated with AmB (4 ug/ml). Supernatant levels of thromboxane B2 were significantly elevated in the presence of AmB vs buffer alone. We conclude that the reduction in RPF and GFR observed with AmB infusion in the rat is partially mediated by release of thromboxane.     

Radioisotopic evaluation of renal function in cyclosporine-treated pediatric and adult renal transplant recipients and their living donors. A study of 152 donor-recipient pairs

Renal function was studied in 2 groups of renal transplant recipients and their donors by technetium-99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and a gamma camera. The pediatric group (group A) comprised 40 children and their adult kidney donors. The adult group (group B) consisted of 112 consecutive adult renal transplant recipients and their adult donors. All patients received kidneys from living donors and were given the same immunosuppression protocol (PRED plus CSA). Donor glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined before nephrectomy and at a mean period of 30 (range 10-50) months after nephrectomy. The graft GFR was measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and at the most recent follow-up visit. Moreover, the functional reserve of the graft was assessed by infusion of dopamine and an amino acid. The postnephrectomy GFR of donors in groups A and B were 74 +/- 18 and 72 +/- 20 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The GFR of pediatric recipients was significantly lower than that of adult recipients at corresponding time points along the course of follow-up. The mean values of graft GFR were 47.6 +/- 20 and 63.8 +/- 29.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 for pediatric and adult recipients, respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, the graft functional reserve was significantly lower in pediatric recipients. These data demonstrate that adult kidneys transplanted into pediatric recipients have lower GFR than those transplanted into adults, despite corrections for body surface area. Although the reason for this phenomenon is unknown, the observation may have important implications for management of pediatric recipients.     

Low dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and glomerular permselectivity in renal transplant recipients

In this study, we determined the fractional clearance of neutral polydisperse dextrans (theta D) and monodisperse dextran sulfate (theta DS) to describe glomerular size and charge selectivity in 25 renal transplant recipients with proteinuria. Thirteen were treated with low dose lisinopril for six months (group 1) and 12 patients without ACE inhibitor therapy formed group 2. Mean arterial blood pressure was stable (group 1, 112 +/- 4; group 2, 109 +/- 2 mm Hg at baseline and after 6 months) whereas creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow decreased nonsignificantly but were comparable at any time. Lisinopril treatment lowered filtration fraction (22 +/- 2 vs. 19 +/- 2%, P = 0.07) whereas no change was seen in group 2 (20 +/- 2%). The fractional protein excretion (mg urinary protein per day/ml creatinine clearance per day) was stable in group 1, but significantly increased in group 2. The same pattern was found for theta D larger than 56 A. theta DS was stable and consistently elevated in both groups at any time. We conclude that low dose ACE inhibitor treatment in proteinuric renal transplant recipients stabilizes glomerular size selectivity independently of its systemic hemodynamic effects.