Successful myoblast transplantation in primates depends on appropriate cell delivery and induction of regeneration in the host muscle

In a double-blind, cross-over study, we examined the effect of inhaled budesonide (800 microgram twice daily via Turbohaler) on lung function and various markers of airway inflammation including airway responsiveness to methacholine (PC20), exhaled nitric oxide (NO), eosinophils in induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and airway biopsies from 14 patients with mild asthma needing beta2- agonist therapy only. After inhaled steroids, there was a significant increase in FEV1 and PC20, and reduction in exhaled NO. Eosinophils in induced sputum and airway biopsy sections were also significantly decreased, although BAL eosinophil counts remained unchanged. At baseline, significant correlations were observed between exhaled NO and PC20 methacholine (r = 0.64, p < 0.05), exhaled NO and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) variability (r = 0. 65, p < 0.05), sputum eosinophils and FEV1 (r = -0.63, p = 0.05), and sputum eosinophils and log PC20 methacholine (r = -0.67, p < 0. 05). After treatment with inhaled steroids, there was a significant correlation between eosinophils in biopsy sections, and BAL, with log PC20 methacholine. It is likely that these parameters represent different aspects of the inflammatory process, which are all inhibited by inhaled steroids.     

Effect of short- and long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic patients

Increased concentrations of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) occur in patients with asthma, and exhaled NO may be useful for assessing the effect of drug therapy on airway inflammation. Beta2-agonists have been proposed to have both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects. We therefore assessed exhaled NO after beta2-agonists in asthmatic patients. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Firstly, exhaled NO was measured in 18 asthmatics (9 taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS)) before and after nebulized salbutamol (5 mg), or identical placebo (0.9% saline). Exhaled NO and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured at 15 min intervals for 1 h (Study 1). Secondly, the effect of 1 week of treatment with the long-acting beta2-agonist, salmeterol (50 microg b.i.d.), added to either budesonide (800 microg b.i.d.) or placebo, was studied in eight mild asthmatic subjects (Study 2). Exhaled NO was measured by a chemiluminescence analyser, adapted for on-line recording. In Study 1, exhaled NO showed no significant change at any time-point in patients not taking inhaled GCS. In asthmatics on inhaled GCS, exhaled NO increased compared to placebo at 15 and 30 min, but this did not reach statistical significance. In Study 2, treatment with salmeterol increased FEV1, but exhaled NO levels were not significantly changed, either after budesonide treatment (143+/-35 to 179+/-67 ppb), or after placebo (201+/-68 to 211+/-65 ppb). Our results confirm that single high dose salbutamol does not increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics not taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Salbutamol may increase exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids. However, regular use of salmeterol resulted in no change in exhaled nitric oxide, either used alone or in combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids.     

Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids

The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) administered via Turbuhaler once or twice daily on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with mild asthma. One hundred and sixty-three children (mean age 9.9 yrs, 56 females/107 males) with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 103% of predicted, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 87% pred, reversibility in FEV1 3%, fall in FEV1 after exercise 10.4% from pre-exercise value) and not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After a two-week run-in period, the children received inhaled BUD 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed before and at the end of treatment. After 12 weeks of therapy, the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test was significantly less in all three BUD groups (43-5.1%) than in the placebo group (8.6%). Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine with the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 decreased significantly in the BUD 100 microg twice-daily group compared with placebo (ratio at the end of treatment 156%). Changes in baseline lung function (FEV1 and PEF) were less marked than changes in bronchial responsiveness. In conclusion, low doses of inhaled budesonide, given once or twice daily, provided protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with mild asthma and near normal lung function.     

Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Montelukast Asthma Study Group

The leukotrienes are known to be important mediators of bronchial asthma. The ability of montelukast, a potent and selective CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonist, to cause a dose-related improvement in chronic asthma was investigated in a placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. After a two week placebo run-in period, chronic asthmatic patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 40-80% predicted with > or = 15% increase (absolute value) after beta2-agonist were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (placebo or montelukast 2, 10, or 50 mg once daily in the evening) for a three week, double-blind treatment period. For patient-reported end-points (daytime symptom score, use of as needed inhaled beta2 agonist, asthma-specific quality of life) and frequency of asthma exacerbations, montelukast 10 and 50 mg caused similar responses, superior to 2 mg and significantly (p<0.05; linear trend test) different from placebo. All three doses caused improvements in FEV1 and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) that were significantly (p<0.05) different from placebo. Differences (least square mean) between the pooled 10 and 50 mg montelukast treatment groups and placebo were: 7.1% change from baseline in FEV1, 19.23 L x min(-1) in morning PEFR, -0.29 in daytime asthma symptom score (absolute value), and -0.82 in beta2-agonist use (puff x day(-1)). The incidence of adverse experiences was neither dose-related nor different between montelukast and placebo treatments. We conclude that montelukast causes a dose-related improvement in patient-reported asthma end-points over the range 2-50 mg. Montelukast causes benefit to chronic asthmatic patients by improving asthma control end-points.     

Exacerbations of asthma without sputum eosinophilia

BACKGROUND: Sputum analysis provides a non-invasive method of examining the airway secretions of subjects with asthma in order to better understand the inflammatory process. Increased proportions of eosinophils are generally seen in the sputum of subjects with asthma, especially when there is an exacerbation. An unexpected observation in the sputum of subjects with mild exacerbations of asthma is reported. METHODS: Thirty four consecutive subjects with symptoms consistent with a mild exacerbation of asthma were recruited for a treatment study. Inclusion criteria required persistent symptoms of chest tightness, dyspnoea, or wheezing for two weeks (without spontaneous improvement or alteration in dose of inhaled corticosteroid) and a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) that was reversible to more than 75% predicted or known best to ensure the exacerbation was mild. Sputum (spontaneous or induced with hypertonic saline) from all subjects was examined for differential cell counts. Eosinophilic sputum was defined as > or = 4% eosinophils on two occasions or > 10% eosinophils once. Clinical characteristics, sputum differential counts, and measurements of airways obstruction were compared between the subjects with and without sputum eosinophilia. RESULTS: Almost half of the subjects (16 of 34) considered to have mildly uncontrolled asthma had no sputum eosinophilia. In comparison with the subjects who had sputum eosinophilia the non-eosinophilic group had less airways obstruction (FEV1% predicted 88% v 70%) and less severe airways hyperresponsiveness (PC20 methacholine 0.45 mg/ml v 0.13 mg/ml). There was no difference between the groups in the type or prevalence of symptoms, history of recent infections, smoking, relevant allergen exposure, or use of inhaled corticosteroid. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of mildly uncontrolled asthma are not always associated with eosinophilic airways inflammation as measured by sputum analysis. The causes and treatment of the non-eosinophilic condition require further investigation.     

Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on the management of asthma advocate the use of anti-inflammatory treatment in all but mild disease. They define disease control in terms of clinical criteria such as lung function and symptoms. However, the relationship between the clinical control of the disease and inflammation of the airways is not clear. A cross sectional study was therefore undertaken to investigate the relationship between airways inflammation and measures of clinical control and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled steroids. METHODS: Twenty six atopic adults (19-45 years) with mild to moderate asthma (baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > or = 50% predicted, concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) 0.02-7.6 mg/ml) on regular treatment with inhaled steroids entered the study. Diary card recordings during the two weeks before a methacholine challenge test and bronchoscopic examination were used to determine peak flow variability, symptom scores, and use of beta 2 agonists. Biopsy specimens were taken by fibreoptic bronchoscopy from the carina of the right lower and middle lobes, and from the main carina. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on cryostat sections with monoclonal antibodies against: eosinophil cationic protein (EG1, EG2), mast cell tryptase (AA1), CD45, CD22, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, and CD45RO. The number of positively stained cells in the lamina propria was counted twice by using an interactive display system. RESULTS: There were no differences in cell numbers between the three sites from which biopsy specimens were taken. The PC20 for methacholine was inversely related to the average number of total leucocytes, EG1+, and EG2+ cells, mast cells, CD8+, and CD45RO+ cells in the lamina propria. These relationships were similar for each of the biopsy sites. Symptom scores, beta 2 agonist usage, FEV1, and peak flow variability were not related to any of the cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria of the airways seems to persist in asthmatic outpatients despite regular treatment with inhaled steroids. The number of infiltrating leucocytes such as mast cells, (activated) eosinophils, CD8+, and CD45RO+ cells in bronchial biopsy specimens from these patients appears to be reflected by airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, but not by symptoms or lung function. These findings may have implications for the adjustment of anti-inflammatory treatment of patients with asthma.     

Relaxin activates the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells in culture

The effects of usual or low doses of inhaled corticosteroids on airway mucosal inflammation have not yet been examined. We therefore, compared the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg x day(-1) on asthma control outcomes and markers of airway inflammation. Twenty-four adult subjects with mild and moderate asthma were randomized to receive either BDP or placebo for four weeks; then subjects entered a single blind four week placebo run-in period. We found that the BDP group had significantly greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), morning peak flow, and rescue salbutamol use than the placebo-treated group. The improvement in FEV1 largely reversed one week after treatment was stopped. The decrease in the median percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the BDP group from 3.8% to 3.4% was not significant, but because eosinophils increased from 8.4% to 12.7% in the placebo group, there was a significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups during treatment in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase mucin-like glycoprotein, or fibrinogen in induced sputum. The change in FEV1 in the BDP group did not correlate significantly with the change in eosinophil percentage or ECP levels. We concluded that four weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 336 microg x day(-1) was associated with significant improvements in peak flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, and rescue salbutamol use in asthmatic subjects but was not associated with large reductions in markers of eosinophilic inflammation, bronchovascular permeability, or mucus hypersecretion.     

Sonographic analysis of recurrent parotitis in children: a comparative study with sialographic findings

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma show altered surface expression of the adhesion molecules CD11b and L-selectin on airway granulocytes compared with blood granulocytes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether this modulation is related to disease activity or due to transendothelial migration, we compared the CD11b and L-selectin expression on blood and induced sputum eosinophils and neutrophils between patients with asthma and normal subjects. METHODS: Eleven normal subjects (21-43 years), nine patients (21-34 years) with mild atopic asthma and 10 patients (20-47 years) with moderate to severe atopic asthma on regular treatment with inhaled steroids underwent sputum induction by inhalation of nebulized hypertonic saline (4.5%). CD11b and L-selectin expression on granulocytes from blood and DTT-homogenized sputum were analysed by flow cytometry. Eosinophils could be discriminated from neutrophils by using depolarized light scatter. Disease activity was assessed by baseline FEV1 and airway responsiveness to histamine (PC20). RESULTS: Sputum eosinophils showed higher expression of CD11b (P<0.001) and lower expression of L-selectin (P<0.001) compared with peripheral blood eosinophils. CD11b and L-selectin expression on eosinophils from blood or sputum did not differ between the three groups. Similar results were obtained for neutrophils. The PC20 in the patients with moderate-to-severe asthma was related to CD11b expression on blood (R=-0.92, P=0.001) and sputum eosinophils (R=0.75, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometry of induced sputum granulocytes from asthmatic as well as normal subjects is feasible. We conclude that the modulated expression of CD11b and L-selectin on airway granulocytes is not specific for asthmatic airway inflammation, but is probably the result of tissue migration per sé. This implies that CD11b and L-selectin expression on granulocytes in induced sputum cannot be used as marker of disease activity.     

Evaluation of the inhaled glucocorticosteroid effects on non specific bronchial reactivity with particular reference to the late inflammatory phase in atopic asthma patients. II. The effect of regular administration of budesonide R on specific and non-specific bronchial reactivity

The purpose of the study was to determine whether regular administration of budesonide R decreases inflammation, specific and non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic asthma patients. The studies were carried out on 16 patients suffering from mild to moderate allergic asthma, sensitive to D. pteronyssinus allergen. After performance of the specific and non-specific bronchial provocation tests, collection of blood samples for an ECP evaluation, the patients were regularly treated with budesonide R, 2 x 320 micrograms for a period of 8 weeks. At the end of the study the BPTs and blood collection were repeated. BPTs with methacholine and D. pteronyssinus were performed according to Ryan's method. After the allergen challenge, early (EAR) and late asthmatic reaction (LAR) were to be observed. After the therapy non-specific BHR to methacholine expressed as PC20FEV1 and specific BHR to allergen (PD20FEV1D. pteronyssinus) and serum ECP concentrations decreased significantly. Although after the treatment with budesonide R, the patients had to inhale much larger amounts of allergen, in order to induce EAR, the number of LAR did not change significantly. After treatment the LAR appeared about 1 hour later and the decrease in FEV1 was less than previously. We conclude that budesonide R decreases the intensity of the inflammation and BHR.     

Combined use of exhaled hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in monitoring asthma

Oxidative stress contributes to airway inflammation and exhaled hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO) are elevated in asthmatic patients. We determined the concentrations of expired H2O2 and NO in 116 asthmatic (72 stable steroid-naive, 30 stable steroid-treated, and 14 severe steroid-treated unstable patients) and in 35 healthy subjects, and studied the relation between exhaled H2O2, NO, FEV1, airway responsiveness, and eosinophils in induced sputum. Both exhaled H2O2 and NO levels were elevated in steroid-naive asthmatic patients compared with normal subjects (0.72 +/- 0.06 versus 0.27 +/- 0.04 microM and 29 +/- 1.9 versus 6.5 +/- 0. 32 ppb, respectively; p < 0.001) and were reduced in stable steroid-treated patients (0.43 +/- 0.08 microM, p < 0.05, and 9.9 +/- 0.97 ppb, p < 0.001). In unstable steroid-treated asthmatics, however, H2O2 levels were increased, but exhaled NO levels were low (0.78 +/- 0.16 microM and 6.7 +/- 1.0 ppb, respectively). There was a correlation between expired H2O2, sputum eosinophils and airway hyperresponsiveness (methacholine PC20). Exhaled NO also correlated with sputum eosinophils, but not with airway hyperresponsiveness. Our findings indicate that measurement of expired H2O2 and NO in asthmatic patients provides complementary data for monitoring of disease activity.     

The importance of serum IgE for level and longitudinal change in airways hyperresponsiveness in COPD

BACKGROUND: Airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is an important feature of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Little is known about factors that modulate AHR in COPD. OBJECTIVE: To study these factors, we performed a long-term, double-blind, parallel intervention study in 58 male, non-allergic patients with COPD. METHODS: During a period of 2 years, patients were treated with inhaled budesonide (1600 microg/day), inhaled budesonide (1600 microg/day) plus oral prednisolone (5 mg/day), or placebo. PC20 histamine was measured at 4-monthly intervals. The influence of treatment, smoking, age, level of lung function, initial serum IgE level and peripheral blood eosinophils on level and longitudinal change of PC20 histamine was analysed. RESULTS: During follow-up, PC20 decreased in our group, and this decrease was not influenced by treatment. PC20 tended to decrease faster in current smokers than in ex-smokers. PC20 was significantly associated with pre-challenge FEV1 at each time point. Level nor decline of PC20 were significantly related to age. A higher initial serum IgE level was independently associated with a lower PC20. Moreover, a higher initial serum IgE level was associated with a slower annual decline of PC20, regardless of treatment, pre-challenge FEV1, and other modulating factors. No significant associations were found between initial blood eosinophils and level or decline of PC20. CONCLUSION: We conclude that AHR increases over time in non-allergic patients with COPD. Treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid alone or in combination with oral prednisolone does not change this increase. Our study suggests an important role for IgE in the course of the disease, since a higher initial serum IgE level predicts a more favourable course with regard to annual decline of PC20 histamine.     

The effect of salmeterol on nocturnal symptoms, airway function, and inflammation in asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of salmeterol alone in a group of patients with moderate asthma with nocturnal worsening of symptoms. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital specializing in respiratory diseases. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with nocturnal asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to salmeterol, 100 micrograms twice daily, or placebo for 6 weeks with a 1-week washout between treatment periods. Symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and beta 2-agonist use were recorded daily. Spirometry was performed at weeks 1 and 6 of each period at bedtime and at 4 AM, and methacholine challenge was performed at 4 AM followed by bronchoscopy with BAL. BAL fluid analysis included cell count and differential count, eosinophil cationic protein, Charcot-Leyden crystal protein, leukotriene B4, and thromboxane B2. RESULTS: The percentage of nights with awakenings decreased significantly with salmeterol (69.8 +/- 8.7% vs 30.6 +/- 10.8% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.02). The percentage of 24-h days with supplemental inhaled beta 2-agonist use significantly decreased with salmeterol (85.9 +/- 9.4% vs 70.4 +/- 10.1% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in bronchial reactivity, 4 AM FEV1, overnight percentage change in FEV1, or indexes of airway inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol alone improves the number of nocturnal awakenings and supplemental 24-h beta 2-agonist use in nocturnal asthma without significantly altering lung function and airway inflammation.     

Misoprostol has no favorable effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mild asthmatics

Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, has been reported to have antibronchoconstricive and antiinflammatory effects in animal studies. We investigated the effect of misoprostol on FEV1 and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine in mildly asthmatics. 14 mildly asthmatic patients were given 400 mg/day oral misoprostol. Four patients had to left the study either due to the side effects. The remaining 10 patients (all women and mean age was 33.2 +/- 3.3) underwent the histamine challenge test before and after the treatment with misoprostol. Mean values of FEV1 obtained before and after the treatment were as follows respectively: 2.79 +/- 0.17 L; 2.78 +/- 0.18 L. Mean log PC20 values were as follows respectively: 0.60 +/- 0.23 mg/ml; 0.60 +/- 0.14 mg/ml. There was no difference either in FEV1 and log PC20 values before and after the treatment with misoprostol (p > 0.05). As a result administered misoprostol has no favorable effect on expiratory flow rates and BHR in asthmatic patients.     

Cross-tachyphylactic airway response to inhaled bradykinin, kallidin and [desArg9]-bradykinin in asthmatic subjects

Kinins are oligopeptides that may act as mediators in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma by interacting with specific cell surface receptors designated B1 and B2. When administered by inhalation to asthmatic subjects, bradykinin and kallidin, but not [desArg9]-bradykinin, provoke potent bronchoconstriction, thus suggesting a specific effect compatible with the stimulation of B2 receptors. To characterize further the receptor(s) mediating this bronchospastic response we have carried out cross-tachyphylactic studies with inhaled bradykinin, kallidin, and [desArg9]-bradykinin, administered in a randomized double-blind fashion in a group of 10 asthmatic subjects. Inhalation of bradykinin and kallidin, but not [desArg9]-bradykinin, elicited concentration-related falls in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in all the subjects studied. The geometric mean provocation concentrations of inhaled agonists reducing FEV1 by 20% of baseline (PC20) were 0.12 and 0.28 mg.ml-1 for bradykinin and kallidin, respectively. When inhaled at concentrations up to 10.62 mg.ml-1, [desArg9]-bradykinin failed to provoke any significant fall in FEV1 from baseline in any of the subjects studied. Following recovery from the second bradykinin challenge, provocation with kallidin revealed a reduced response to this agonist, the PC20 value increasing from 0.28 to 1.23 mg.ml-1. Similarly, once the airways had recovered from the second kallidin challenge, provocation with bradykinin also showed a reduced response, the PC20Bk increasing from 0.12 to 0.94 mg.ml-1. Surprisingly, despite failing to cause bronchoconstriction, repeated exposures with inhaled [desArg9]-bradykinin reduced the airway response to bradykinin, the PC20Bk increasing from 0.12 to 0.41 mg.ml-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma

We hypothesized that regular use of long-acting beta-agonists could delay recognition of ("mask") increasing airway inflammation. We studied steroid-sparing and "masking" effects of salmeterol versus placebo in 13 asthmatic individuals requiring >= 1,500 microgram inhaled corticosteroid daily. Corticosteroid doses were reduced weekly until criteria were met for an exacerbation or the corticosteroid was fully withdrawn. Subjects were restabilized on their original dose of inhaled corticosteroid for 4 wk before crossover to the alternative treatment. Subjects maintained symptom and peak expiratory flow (PEF) diaries, and underwent weekly spirometric, methacholine challenge, sputum eosinophil, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) measurements. Mean corticosteroid dose was reduced by 87% during salmeterol treatment, versus 69% with placebo (p = 0.04). Sputum eosinophils increased before exacerbation despite stable symptoms, FEV1, and PEF. In the week before clinical exacerbation, sputum eosinophil counts were higher in the salmeterol-treatment arm (19.9 +/- 29.8% [mean +/- SD], versus placebo 9.3 +/- 17.6%; p = 0.006). Five subjects showed > 10% sputum eosinophilia before exacerbation during salmeterol treatment, as compared with two receiving placebo. In this model, salmeterol controlled symptoms and lung function until inflammation became significantly more advanced. We conclude that the bronchodilating and symptom-relieving effects of salmeterol can mask increasing inflammation and delay awareness of worsening asthma.     

Effect of addition of inhaled salmeterol to the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthmatics uncontrolled on high-dose inhaled steroids. European Respiratory Study Group

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. (SM) versus inhaled salbutamol 400 micrograms q.d.s. (SB), both via the Diskhaler, when added to concurrent treatment, in asthmatic patients who were not controlled on high doses of inhaled steroids (> or = 1,500 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or equivalent daily). This was a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind study in which 190 patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 30-75% predicted and 15% reversibility to inhaled bronchodilator were randomized to treatment for 6 weeks. In the SM group, morning PEFR increased from 281 to 315 L-min-1 during treatment and in the SB group from 311 to 315 L.min-1 (p < 0.001). The SM group showed significantly better reduction in diurnal variation, from 39 to 22 L.min-1 during treatment, than the SB group (34 to 37 L.min-1) (p < 0.001). There was a significantly greater improvement in FEV1 in the SM group (from 1.63 to 1.85 L) than in the SB group (from 1.79 to 1.84 L). The SM group had significantly more symptom-free nights than the SB group (p < 0.001), and also more "rescue-free" nights (p = 0.04). The adverse event profile was similar in both groups. This study indicates that in asthmatic patients, not controlled on high-dose inhaled steroids, inhaled salmeterol 100 micrograms b.d. significantly improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms.     

Nedocromil sodium in obstructive airways disease: effect on symptoms and plasma protein leakage in sputum

In patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, there is chronic airway inflammation with increased leakage of plasma proteins into the airway lumen, which can be reduced by inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Nedocromil sodium is an anti-inflammatory drug, and we questioned whether it also affects the leakage of plasma proteins. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study we investigated the effect of 12 weeks of treatment with nedocromil on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), peak flow, symptom scores, and plasma protein leakage in sputum, in 31 patients with obstructive airways disease and sputum production (mean (range) FEV1 61% of predicted (42-87%); geometric mean (range) PC20 0.39 (0.04-2.9) mg x mL(-1)). As a measure for plasma protein leakage we calculated the relative coefficients of excretion (RCE) of proteins from serum to the soluble phase of sputum. There was a small increase in morning and evening peak flow (p<0.05) and a decrease in night-time bronchodilator use (p<0.02) in favour of nedocromil. The RCE of alpha2-macroglobulin to albumin significantly decreased after treatment with nedocromil (p=0.03). The results show limited clinical efficacy of nedocromil in our study group. They further suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of nedocromil extend to inhibition of plasma protein leakage into the airways.     

Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

BACKGROUND: The role of long-acting, inhaled beta2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide. METHODS: After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 microg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days. RESULTS: The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were reduced by 26 percent and 40 percent, respectively, when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The higher dose of budesonide alone reduced the rates of severe and mild exacerbations by 49 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Patients treated with formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide had the greatest reductions -- 63 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Symptoms of asthma and lung function improved with both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide, but the improvements with formoterol were greater. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids, the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy or the use of a higher dose of budesonide may be beneficial. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy improves symptoms and lung function without lessening the control of asthma.     

Comparison between eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: The usefulness and safety of the analysis of blood inflammatory markers in asthma are widely recognized. Recently, the analysis of induced sputum has been proposed as a safe, non-invasive tool in the study of airway inflammation in asthma. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to test whether sputum analysis is more useful than blood analysis in the evaluation of airway inflammation in untreated and treated asthmatic patients. METHODS: Twelve untreated patients with mild to moderate asthma underwent a methacholine challenge test, sputum induction and blood sampling. A group of 14 normal subjects was also evaluated for baseline comparison. The same evaluation was repeated after 3 months of budesonide treatment. Before and after treatment, we tested the relationship of eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood with clinical and functional data. We also compared eosinophilic markers in induced sputum with the same markers in blood. RESULTS: Untreated patients showed a significant relationship between sputum eosinophils and symptom score, and between sputum eosinophilic cationic protein and symptom score, FEV1 and PD20FEV1. No relationship between blood eosinophilic markers and clinical or functional data was observed. In budesonide-treated patients, both sputum and blood eosinophils were significantly lower than in untreated patients, but eosinophil decrease was greater in sputum than in blood. Sputum eosinophilic proteins were also significantly lower in treated patients, whereas serum eosinophilic proteins were low at baseline and remained unchanged after treatment. Sputum eosinophilic markers were lower in normal subjects than in both untreated and treated patients, while blood eosinophils, but not serum eosinophilic cationic protein, were lower in normals than in untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of induced sputum is more useful than the analysis of blood in the evaluation of asthma severity and of the effect of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma.