首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
This article describes two different word sense disambiguation (WSD) systems, one applicable to parallel corpora and requiring aligned wordnets and the other one, knowledge poorer, albeit more relevant for real applications, relying on unsupervised learning methods and only monolingual data (text and wordnet). Comparing performances of word sense disambiguation systems is a very difficult evaluation task when different sense inventories are used and even more difficult when the sense distinctions are not of the same granularity. However, as we used the same sense inventory, the performance of the two WSD systems can be objectively compared and we bring evidence that multilingual WSD is more precise than monolingual WSD.  相似文献   

2.
3.
The problem and process of identifying the meaning of a word as per its usage context is called word sense disambiguation (WSD). Although research in this field has been ongoing for the past forty years, a distinct change of techniques adopted can be observed over time. Two important parameters govern the direction in which WSD research progresses during any period. These are the underlying requirement of the kind of sense disambiguation, or the domain, and the robustness of available knowledge in the form of corpora or dictionaries. This paper surveys the progress of WSD over time and the important linguistic achievements that enabled this progress.  相似文献   

4.
针对传统基于义原同现频率的汉语词义排歧算法的“盲目性”,提出一种“双距离”词义排歧算法,即在计算待排歧词各义项与特征词之间的相关系数时,考虑两个距离因素:特征词与待排歧词之间的空间距离;最近选择该义项的同形歧词与该待排歧词之间的空间距离。实验表明,改进的算法是有效的。  相似文献   

5.
词义消歧一直是自然语言处理领域中的关键性问题。为了提高词义消歧的准确率,从目标歧义词汇出发,挖掘左右词单元的语义知识。以贝叶斯模型为基础,结合左右词单元的语义信息,提出了一种新的词义消歧方法。以SemEval-2007:Task#5作为训练语料和测试语料,对词义消歧分类器进行优化,并对优化后的分类器进行测试。实验结果表明:词义消歧的准确率有所提高。  相似文献   

6.
The present paper concentrates on the issue of feature selection for unsupervised word sense disambiguation (WSD) performed with an underlying Naïve Bayes model. It introduces web N-gram features which, to our knowledge, are used for the first time in unsupervised WSD. While creating features from unlabeled data, we are “helping” a simple, basic knowledge-lean disambiguation algorithm to significantly increase its accuracy as a result of receiving easily obtainable knowledge. The performance of this method is compared to that of others that rely on completely different feature sets. Test results concerning nouns, adjectives and verbs show that web N-gram feature selection is a reliable alternative to previously existing approaches, provided that a “quality list” of features, adapted to the part of speech, is used.  相似文献   

7.
词语的歧义问题给语言的自动理解造成了困难,词义消歧研究是解决该问题的方法。当前统计学习的方法在该问题的研究上得到了普遍的应用,然而限于训练语料的规模,统计词义消歧方法还不能获得十分满意的结果。如何在有限规模的训练语料的条件下,提高统计学习的效率,改善学习效果,是有监督词义消歧方法研究上的热点问题。在词语扩展思想的基础上,设计了一种以基于指示词扩展的词义消歧新方法,并通过实验证明该方法可以在不增大训练语料规模的前提下提高有监督词义消歧的精度。  相似文献   

8.
This paper aims to fully present a new word sense disambiguation method that has been introduced in Hristea and Popescu (Fundam Inform 91(3–4):547–562, 2009) and so far tested in the case of adjectives (Hristea and Popescu in Fundam Inform 91(3–4):547–562, 2009) and verbs (Hristea in Int Rev Comput Softw 4(1):58–67, 2009). We hereby extend the method to the case of nouns and draw conclusions regarding its performance with respect to all these parts of speech. The method lies at the border between unsupervised and knowledge-based techniques. It performs unsupervised word sense disambiguation based on an underlying Naïve Bayes model, while using WordNet as knowledge source for feature selection. The performance of the method is compared to that of previous approaches that rely on completely different feature sets. Test results for all involved parts of speech show that feature selection using a knowledge source of type WordNet is more effective in disambiguation than local type features (like part-of-speech tags) are.  相似文献   

9.
There are now many computer programs for automatically determining the sense in which a word is being used. One would like to be able to say which are better, which worse, and also which words, or varieties of language, present particular problems to which algorithms. An evaluation exercise is required, and such an exercise requires a “gold standard” dataset of correct answers. Producing this proves to be a difficult and challenging task. In this paper I discuss the background, challenges and strategies, and present a detailed methodology for ensuring that the gold standard is not fool's gold.  相似文献   

10.
11.
为了提高词义消歧的质量, 对歧义词汇的上下文进行结构分析, 提出了一种利用句法知识来指导消歧过程的方法。在歧义词汇上下文的句法树中, 提取句法信息和词性信息作为消歧特征; 同时, 使用朴素贝叶斯模型作为消歧分类器。利用词义标注语料对分类器的参数进行优化, 然后对测试数据中的歧义词汇进行消歧。实验结果表明, 消歧的准确率有所提升, 达到了66. 7%。  相似文献   

12.
词义消歧要解决如何让计算机理解多义词在上下文中的具体含义,对信息检索、机器翻译、文本分类和自动文摘等自然语言处理问题有着十分重要的作用。通过引入句法信息,提出了一种新的词义消歧方法。构造歧义词汇上下文的句法树,提取句法信息、词性信息和词形信息作为消歧特征。利用贝叶斯模型来建立词义消歧分类器,并将其应用到测试数据集上。实验结果表明:消歧的准确率有所提升,达到了65%。  相似文献   

13.
In this paper, a survey of works on word sense disambiguation is presented, and the method used in the Texterra system [1] is described. The method is based on calculation of semantic relatedness of Wikipedia concepts. Comparison of the proposed method and the existing word sense disambiguation methods on various document collections is given.  相似文献   

14.
Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is the problem of determining the right sense of a polysemous word in a certain context. This paper investigates the use of unlabeled data for WSD within a framework of semi-supervised learning, in which labeled data is iteratively extended from unlabeled data. Focusing on this approach, we first explicitly identify and analyze three problems inherently occurred piecemeal in the general bootstrapping algorithm; namely the imbalance of training data, the confidence of new labeled examples, and the final classifier generation; all of which will be considered integratedly within a common framework of bootstrapping. We then propose solutions for these problems with the help of classifier combination strategies. This results in several new variants of the general bootstrapping algorithm. Experiments conducted on the English lexical samples of Senseval-2 and Senseval-3 show that the proposed solutions are effective in comparison with previous studies, and significantly improve supervised WSD.  相似文献   

15.
为解决词义消歧问题,引入了语义相关度计算。研究并设计了词语相关度计算模型,即在充分考虑语义资源《知网》中概念间结构特点、概念信息量和概念释义的基础上,利用概念词与实例词间的搭配所表征的词语间强关联来进行词语相关度的计算。实验结果表明,该模型得到的语义相关度结果对于解决WSD问题提供了良好的支撑依据。  相似文献   

16.
Concrete concepts are often easier to understand than abstract concepts. The notion of abstractness is thus closely tied to the organisation of our semantic memory, and more specifically our internal lexicon, which underlies our word sense disambiguation (WSD) mechanisms. State-of-the-art automatic WSD systems often draw on a variety of contextual cues and assign word senses by an optimal combination of statistical classifiers. The validity of various lexico-semantic resources as models of our internal lexicon and the cognitive aspects pertinent to the lexical sensitivity of WSD are seldom questioned. We attempt to address these issues by examining psychological evidence of the internal lexicon and its compatibility with the information available from computational lexicons. In particular, we compare the responses from a word association task against existing lexical resources, WordNet and SUMO, to explore the relation between sense abstractness and semantic activation, and thus the implications on semantic network models and the lexical sensitivity of WSD. Our results suggest that concrete senses are more readily activated than abstract senses, and broad associations are more easily triggered than narrow paradigmatic associations. The results are expected to inform the construction of lexico-semantic resources and WSD strategies.  相似文献   

17.
18.
Identifying the correct sense of a word in context is crucial for many tasks in natural language processing (machine translation is an example). State-of-the art methods for Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) build models using hand-crafted features that usually capturing shallow linguistic information. Complex background knowledge, such as semantic relationships, are typically either not used, or used in specialised manner, due to the limitations of the feature-based modelling techniques used. On the other hand, empirical results from the use of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) systems have repeatedly shown that they can use diverse sources of background knowledge when constructing models. In this paper, we investigate whether this ability of ILP systems could be used to improve the predictive accuracy of models for WSD. Specifically, we examine the use of a general-purpose ILP system as a method to construct a set of features using semantic, syntactic and lexical information. This feature-set is then used by a common modelling technique in the field (a support vector machine) to construct a classifier for predicting the sense of a word. In our investigation we examine one-shot and incremental approaches to feature-set construction applied to monolingual and bilingual WSD tasks. The monolingual tasks use 32 verbs and 85 verbs and nouns (in English) from the SENSEVAL-3 and SemEval-2007 benchmarks; while the bilingual WSD task consists of 7 highly ambiguous verbs in translating from English to Portuguese. The results are encouraging: the ILP-assisted models show substantial improvements over those that simply use shallow features. In addition, incremental feature-set construction appears to identify smaller and better sets of features. Taken together, the results suggest that the use of ILP with diverse sources of background knowledge provide a way for making substantial progress in the field of WSD. A.S. is also an Adjust Professor at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales; and a Visiting Professor at the Computing Laboratory, University of Oxford.  相似文献   

19.
This paper ultimately discusses the importance of the clustering method used in unsupervised word sense disambiguation. It illustrates the fact that a powerful clustering technique can make up for lack of external knowledge of all types. It argues that feature selection does not always improve disambiguation results, especially when using an advanced, state of the art method, hereby exemplified by spectral clustering. Disambiguation results obtained when using spectral clustering in the case of the main parts of speech (nouns, adjectives, verbs) are compared to those of the classical clustering method given by the Naïve Bayes model. In the case of unsupervised word sense disambiguation with an underlying Naïve Bayes model feature selection performed in two completely different ways is surveyed. The type of feature selection providing the best results (WordNet-based feature selection) is equally being used in the case of spectral clustering. The conclusion is that spectral clustering without feature selection (but using its own feature weighting) produces superior disambiguation results in the case of all parts of speech.  相似文献   

20.
Corpus-based techniques have proved to be very beneficial in the development of efficient and accurate approaches to word sense disambiguation (WSD) despite the fact that they generally represent relatively shallow knowledge. It has always been thought, however, that WSD could also benefit from deeper knowledge sources. We describe a novel approach to WSD using inductive logic programming to learn theories from first-order logic representations that allows corpus-based evidence to be combined with any kind of background knowledge. This approach has been shown to be effective over several disambiguation tasks using a combination of deep and shallow knowledge sources. Is it important to understand the contribution of the various knowledge sources used in such a system. This paper investigates the contribution of nine knowledge sources to the performance of the disambiguation models produced for the SemEval-2007 English lexical sample task. The outcome of this analysis will assist future work on WSD in concentrating on the most useful knowledge sources.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号