Impact Factors for Curved Continuous Composite Multiple-Box Girder Bridges

The results from a parametric study on the impact factors for 180 curved continuous composite multiple-box girder bridges are presented. Expressions for the impact factors for tangential flexural stresses, deflection, shear forces and reactions are deduced for AASHTO truck loading. The finite-element method was utilized to model the bridges as three-dimensional structures. The vehicle axle used in the analysis was simulated as a pair of concentrated forces moving along the concrete deck in a circumferential path with a constant speed. The effects of bridge configurations, loading positions, and vehicle speed on the impact factors were examined. Bridge configurations included span length, span-to-radius of curvature ratio, number of lanes, and number of boxes. The effect of the mass of the vehicle on the dynamic response of the bridges is also investigated. The data generated from the parametric study and the deduced expressions for the impact factors would enable bridge engineers to design curved continuous composite multiple-box girder bridges more reliably and economically.     

Impact Factors for Horizontally Curved Composite Box Girder Bridges

This paper presents a method for determining the dynamic impact factors for horizontally curved composite single- or multicell box girder bridges under AASHTO truck loading. The bridges are modeled as three-dimensional structures using commercially available software. The vehicle is idealized as a pair of concentrated forces, with no mass, traveling in two circumferential paths parallel to the curved centerline of bridges. An extensive parametric study is conducted, in which over 215 curved composite box girder bridge prototypes are analyzed. The key parameters considered in this study are: Number of cells, number of lanes, degree of curvature, arc span length, slope of the outer steel webs, number and area of bracing and top chord systems, and truck(s) speed and truck(s) positioning. Based on the data generated from the parametric study, expressions for dynamic impact factors for longitudinal moment, reaction, and deflection are proposed as function of the ratio of the arc span length to the radius of curvature. The results from this study would enable bridge engineers to design horizontally curved composite box girder bridges more reliably and economically. Furthermore, the results can be used to potentially increase the live-load capacity of existing bridges to prevent posting or closing of the bridge.     

Dynamic Analysis of Curved Continuous Multiple-Box Girder Bridges

The use of horizontally curved composite multiple-box girder bridges in modern highway systems is quite suitable in resisting torsional and warping effects induced by highway curvatures. Bridge users react adversely to vibrations of a bridge and especially where torsional modes dominate. In this paper, continuous curved composite multiple-box girder bridges are analyzed, using the finite-element method, to evaluate their natural frequencies and mode shapes. Experimental tests are conducted on two continuous twin-box girder bridge models of different curvatures to verify and substantiate the finite-element model. Empirical expressions are deduced from these results to evaluate the fundamental frequency for such bridges. The parameters considered herein are the span length, number of lanes, number of boxes, span-to-radius of curvature ratio, span-to-depth ratio, end-diaphragm thickness, number of cross bracings, and number of spans.     

Lateral Load Distribution in Curved Steel I-Girder Bridges

The purpose of this paper is to develop new formulas for live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The formulas are developed by utilizing computer model results for a number of different horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The bridges used in this study are modeled as generalized grillage beam systems composed of horizontally curved beam elements for steel girders and substructure elements for lateral wind bracing and cross frames which consist of truss elements. Warping torsion is taken into consideration in the analysis. The effect of numerous parameters, including radius of curvature, girder spacing, overhang, etc., on the load distribution are studied. Key parameters affecting live load distribution are identified and simplified formulas are developed to predict positive moment, negative moment, and shear distribution for one-lane and multiple-lane loading. Comparisons of the formulas with finite element method and grillage analysis show that the proposed formulas have more accurate results than the various available American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials specifications. The formulas developed in this study will assist bridge engineers and researchers in predicting the actual live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges.     

Simply Supported Curved Cellular Bridges: Simplified Design Method

The use of curved composite bridges in interchanges of modern highway systems has become increasingly popular for economic and aesthetic considerations. Bridges with a concrete deck composite with a steel multicell section can adequately resist torsional and warping effects induced by high curvature. Although current design practices in North America recommend few analytical methods for the design of curved multicell box girder bridges, economical requirements in the design process point to a need for a simplified design method. This paper summarizes the results from an extensive parametric study, using the finite-element method, in which simply supported curved composite multicell bridge prototypes are analyzed to evaluate the moment and deflection distributions between girders, as well as the axial forces expected in the bracing system, due to truck loading as well as dead load. Results from tests on four, 1∕12 linear-scale, simply supported curved composite concrete deck-steel multicell bridge models are used to substantiate and verify the analytical modeling. The parameters considered in the study are cross-bracing system, aspect ratio, number of lanes, number of cells, and degree of curvature. Based on the data generated from the parametric study, expressions for moment and deflection distribution factors are deduced. Expressions for the maximum axial force in bracing members are also derived. An illustrative design example is presented.     

Effect of Multilanes on Wheel Load Distribution in Steel Girder Bridges

This paper presents the results of a parametric study that investigated the effect of multilanes and continuity on wheel load distribution in steel girder bridges. Typical one- and two-span, two-, three-, and four-lane, straight, composite steel girder bridges were selected for this study. The major bridge parameters chosen for this study were the span length, girder spacing, one- versus two-spans, and the number of lanes. These parameters were varied within practical ranges to study their influence on the wheel load distribution factors. A total of 144 bridges were analyzed using the finite-element method. The computer program, SAP90, was used to model the concrete slab as quadrilateral shell elements and the steel girders as space frame members. Simple supports were used to model the boundary conditions. AASHTO HS20 design trucks were positioned in all lanes of the one- and two-span bridges to produce the maximum bending moments. The calculated finite-element wheel load distribution factors were compared with the AASHTO and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 12-26 formulas. The results of this parametric study agree with the newly developed NCHRP 12-26 formula and both were, in general, less than the empirical AASHTO formula (S∕5.5) for longer span lengths [>15.25 m (50 ft)] and girder spacing >1.8 m (6 ft). This paper demonstrates that the multiple lane reduction factors are built into the newly developed distribution factors for steel girder bridges that were presented in the NCHRP 12-26 final report. It should be noted that AASHTO LRFD contains a similar expression that results in a value that is 50% of the value in the equations developed as a part of NCHRP 12-26. This is due to the fact that AASHTO LRFD consider the entire design truck instead of half-truck (wheel loads) as the case in the NCHRP 12-26 report and the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. Therefore, this paper supports the use of the new distribution factors for steel girder bridges developed as a part of NCHRP 12-26 and consequently the distribution factors presented in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.     

Full-Scale Test and Analysis of a Curved Steel-Box Girder Bridge

Since the first edition of the AASHTO Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges was published in 1980, there have been two more editions including many revisions to the specifications. Some changes were based on valid research results and others were based on limited or uncertain research results and information. The current edition of the specifications contains provisions that may result in unreasonably conservative load capacity ratings. In this paper, the results of field tests and analyses conducted on the Veterans’ Memorial curved steel-box girder bridge are discussed. Test and analytical results show: (1) current AASHTO guide specifications regarding the first transverse stiffener spacing at the simple end support of a curved girder may be too conservative for bridge load capacity ratings; (2) current AASHTO guide specifications may greatly overestimate the dynamic loadings of curved box girder bridges with long span lengths; and (3) a plane grid finite-element model of about 20 elements per span in the longitudinal direction can be used to analyze curved multigirder bridges with external bracings located only over supports. The research results are instructive and applicable to bridge design and bridge load-rating activities.     

Distribution Factors for Curved Continuous Composite Box-Girder Bridges

The use of horizontally curved composite box-girder bridges in modern highway systems has become increasingly popular for economic as well as for aesthetic considerations. Based on a recent literature review on the design of box-girder bridges, it was observed that a simple design method for curved bridges, based on load distribution factors for stresses and shears, is as yet unavailable. This paper presents the results of an extensive parametric study, using a finite element method, in which the structural responses of 240 two-equal-span continuous curved box-girder bridges of various geometries were investigated. The parameters considered in this study included span-to-radius of curvature ratio, span length, number of lanes, number of boxes, web slope, number of bracings, and truck loading type. Based on the data generated from this study, empirical formulas for load distribution factors for maximum longitudinal flexural stresses and maximum deflection due to dead load as well as AASHTO live loading were deduced. An illustrative design example is presented.     

Distribution of Wheel Loads on Continuous Steel Spread-Box Girder Bridges

Composite concrete-steel spread (multispine) box girder bridges remain one of the most common types constructed. Current design practices in North America recommend few analytical methods for the design of such bridges in simply supported construction. However, the effects of continuous construction have not been dealt with fully. In designing a continuous bridge, it is important to determine the maximum negative and positive stresses, maximum reactions, and shears in the bridge subjected to various loadings. This paper presents an extensive parametric study using a finite-element model in which 60 continuous bridge prototypes of various geometries, each subjected to various loading conditions, are analyzed for the distribution of flexural stresses, deflection, shears, and reactions. The parameters considered in the study are span length, number of spread boxes, and number of lanes. Distribution factors for maximum flexural stresses, deflection, shears, and reactions, suitable for design, are deduced for AASHTO truck loading. Results from tests on five box girder bridge models verify the finite-element model. A design example is presented to illustrate the use of the deduced formulas for the distribution factors.     

Live Load Distribution Formulas for Single-Span Prestressed Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Girders

In this study, live load distribution formulas for the girders of single-span integral abutment bridges (IABs) are developed. For this purpose, two and three dimensional finite-element models (FEMs) of several IABs are built and analyzed. In the analyses, the effects of various superstructure properties such as span length, number of design lanes, prestressed concrete girder size, and spacing as well as slab thickness are considered. The results from the analyses of two and three dimensional FEMs are then used to calculate the live load distribution factors (LLDFs) for the girders of IABs as a function of the above mentioned parameters. The LLDFs for the girders are also calculated using the AASHTO formulas developed for simply supported bridges (SSBs). The comparison of the analyses results revealed that LLDFs for girder moments and exterior girder shear of IABs are generally smaller than those calculated for SSBs using AASHTO formulas especially for short spans. However, AASHTO LLDFs for interior girder shear are found to be in good agreement with those obtained for IABs. Consequently, direct live load distribution formulas and correction factors to the current AASHTO live load distribution equations are developed to estimate the girder live load moments and exterior girder live load shear for IABs with prestressed concrete girders. It is observed that the developed formulas yield a reasonably good estimate of live load effects in prestressed concrete IAB girders.     

Development and Implementation of a Continuous Strain Monitoring System on a Multi-Girder Composite Steel Bridge

This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a long-term strain monitoring system on a three-span, multisteel girder composite bridge located on the interstate system. The bridge is part of a network of bridges that are currently being monitored in Connecticut. The three steel girders are simply supported, whereas the concrete slab is continuous over the interior supports. The bridge has been analyzed using the standard AASHTO Specifications and the analytical predictions have been compared with the field monitoring results. The study has included determination of the location of the neutral axes and the evaluation of the load distributions to the different girders when large trucks cross the bridge. A finite-element analysis of the bridge has been carried out to further study the distribution of live load stresses in the steel girders and to study how continuity of the slabs at the interior joints would influence the overall behavior. The results of the continuous data collection are being used to evaluate the influence of truck traffic on the bridge and to establish a baseline for long-term monitoring.     

Literature Review in Analysis of Box-Girder Bridges

The curvilinear nature of box girder bridges along with their complex deformation patterns and stress fields have led designers to adopt approximate and conservative methods for their analyses and design. Recent literature on straight and curved box girder bridges has dealt with analytical formulations to better understand the behavior of these complex structural systems. Few authors have undertaken experimental studies to investigate the accuracy of existing methods. This paper presents highlights of references pertaining to straight and curved box girder bridges in the form of single-cell, multiple-spine, and multicell cross sections. The literature survey presented herein deals with: (1) elastic analysis, and (2) experimental studies on the elastic response of box girder bridges.     

Stability Bracing Requirements for Steel Bridge Girders with Skewed Supports

Cross frames and diaphragms are critical elements for the stability of I-shaped steel bridge girders during construction. The AASHTO specifications are relatively vague with regards to the stability design requirements of the braces. Spacing limits that have been used in past AASHTO specifications have been removed from the Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification, which instead requires the bracing to be designed by a rational analysis. Whereas the AASHTO specification does not define what constitutes a rational analysis, stability bracing systems must possess adequate stiffness and strength. The commercially available software packages that are typically used in bridge design generally do not have the capabilities to determine the adequacy of the bracing from a stability perspective. This paper outlines the stability bracing requirements for bridges with normal and skewed supports. The effects of support skew on the stiffness and strength requirements for stability bracing are addressed. Solutions that are available for systems with normal supports were modified to account for the effects of the support skew angle. Two orientations of the intermediate bracing were considered: parallel to the skew angles and perpendicular to the longitudinal girder axis. The solutions are presented and compared with finite-element results. The design solutions have good agreement with the finite-element solutions.     

Strength of Stiffened Flanges in Horizontally Curved Box Girders

Longitudinal stiffeners are often attached to increase the buckling strength of thin-walled box girder flanges. The minimum required rigidity for longitudinal stiffeners for curved box girder flanges is given by the AASHTO “Guide specifications for horizontally curved steel girder highway bridges.” However, this requirement is simply adopted from the current AASHTO specifications for straight stiffened flanges. The validity of this requirement has been questioned in a series of recent studies. The effect of important design parameters on the minimum required stiffener rigidity is investigated numerically in this study by examining the prebuckling stress distribution and elastic and inelastic buckling stresses of horizontally curved stiffened flanges. In order to characterize and quantify the analytically collected data, a series of parametric studies were performed. A new equation for the minimum required rigidity for the longitudinal stiffeners is derived from regression analyses. Through the evaluation of a few selected case studies and a design example, the validity and reliability of the proposed new equation is demonstrated.     

Construction of a Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge. Part II: Inconsistent Detailing

The erection of horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges tends to be more complex than the erection of straight steel I-girder bridges. The erection of a curved steel I-girder bridge can be further complicated when the cross-frame members and girders are detailed inconsistently in an effort to force bridge components into some desirable geometric condition. Inconsistent detailing involves the intentional specification of cross-frame members that are either too long or too short to align with girder connector plates properly so as to force the girders into a given position, resulting in connection misalignments that must be resolved by applying external forces to the bridge components. The current research investigates the erection of a recently constructed horizontally curved steel I-girder bridge and highlights the fact that practice of inconsistent detailing can lead to very formidable and costly fit-up problems in the field; especially when girder sizes are large.     

Evaluation of Load Distribution Factor by Series Solution for Orthotropic Bridge Decks

In bridge engineering, the three-dimensional behavior of a bridge system is usually reduced to the analysis of a T-beam section, loaded by an equivalent fraction of the applied live load, which is called the live load distribution factor (LDF). The LDF is defined in the both the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the LRFD Specifications primarily for concrete slabs and has inherent applicable limitations. This paper provides explicit formulas using series solutions for LDF of orthotropic bridge decks, applicable to various materials but intended for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) decks. The present formulation considers important parameters that represent the response characteristics of the structure that are often omitted or limited in the AASHTO Specifications. A one-term series solution is proposed based on the macroflexibility approach, in which the bridge system is simplified into two major components, deck and stringers. The governing equations for the two components are obtained separately, and the deflections and interaction forces are solved by ensuring displacement compatibility at stringer lines. The LDF is calculated as the ratio of the single stringer interaction force to the summation of total stringer interaction forces. To verify this solution, a finite-element (FE) parametric study is conducted on 66 simply supported concrete slab-on-steel girder bridges. The results from the series solution correlates well with the FE results. It is also illustrated that the series solution can be applied to predict LDF for FRP deck-on-steel girder bridges, by favorable comparisons among the analytical, FE, and testing results for a one-third-scale bridge model. The scale test specimen consists of an FRP sandwich deck attached to steel stringers by a mechanical connector. The series solution is further used to obtain multiple regression functions for the LDF in terms of nondimensional variables, which can be used for simplified design purposes.     

Load Distribution for a Highly Skewed Bridge: Testing and Analysis

The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifications provide formulas for determining live load distribution factors for bridges. For load distribution factors to be accurate, the behavior of the bridge must be understood. While the behavior of right-angle bridges and bridges with limited skews is relatively well understood, that of highly skewed bridges is not. This paper presents a study aimed at developing a better understanding of the transverse load distribution for highly skewed slab-on-steel girder bridges. The study involved both a diagnostic field test of a recently constructed bridge and an extensive numerical analysis. The bridge tested and analyzed is a two-span, continuous, slab-on-steel composite highway bridge with a skew angle of 60°. The bridge behavior is defined based on the field test data. Finite-element analyses of the bridge were conducted to investigate the influence of model mesh, transverse stiffness, diaphragms, and modeling of the supports. The resulting test and analytical results are compared with AASHTO’s Load and Resistance Factor Design formulas for live load distribution to assess the accuracy of the current empirical formulas.     

Influence of Skew Angle on Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges

The effect of a skew angle on simple-span reinforced concrete bridges is presented in this paper using the finite-element method. The parameters investigated in this analytical study were the span length, slab width, and skew angle. The finite-element analysis (FEA) results for skewed bridges were compared to the reference straight bridges as well as the American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard Specifications and LRFD procedures. A total of 96 case study bridges were analyzed and subjected to AASHTO HS-20 design trucks positioned close to one edge on each bridge to produce maximum bending in the slab. The AASHTO Standard Specifications procedure gave similar results to the FEA maximum longitudinal bending moment for a skew angle less than or equal to 20°. As the skew angle increased, AASHTO Standard Specifications overestimated the maximum moment by 20% for 30°, 50% for 40°, and 100% for 50°. The AASHTO LRFD Design Specifications procedure overestimated the FEA maximum longitudinal bending moment. This overestimate increased with the increase in the skew angle, and decreased when the number of lanes increased; AASHTO LRFD overestimated the longitudinal bending moment by up to 40% for skew angles less than 30° and reaching 50% for 50°. The ratio between the three-dimensional FEA longitudinal moments for skewed and straight bridges was almost one for bridges with skew angle less than 20°. This ratio decreased to 0.75 for bridges with skew angles between 30 and 40°, and further decreased to 0.5 as the skew angle of the bridge increased to 50°. This decrease in the longitudinal moment ratio is offset by an increase of up to 75% in the maximum transverse moment ratio as the skew angle increases from 0 to 50°. The ratio between the FEA maximum live-load deflection for skewed bridges and straight bridges decreases in a pattern consistent with that of the longitudinal moment. This ratio decreased from one for skew angles less than 10° to 0.6 for skew angles between 40 and 50°.