首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Analysis of the turbine deblading in an HTGR with the CATHARE code   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
The direct coupling of a Gas Cooled Reactor (GCR) with a closed gas-turbine cycle leads to a specific dynamic plant behaviour. This behaviour is described and illustrated through computer analyses performed at CEA with the computer code CATHARE. This analysis requires a 1D code able to simulate the whole reactor, including the core, the vessel, the piping and the components (turbine, compressors, heat exchangers).This paper is devoted to deblading accidents. The problems and solutions encountered in various types of gas-turbines are presented: aero engines, steam turbines (EDF-Porcheville steam turbine accident feedback) and finally the feedback from previous High Temperature Gas Reactor experiments (EVO helium loop, HHT project and other HTR projects) are displayed. From this literature survey, some recommendations are drawn for a future High Temperature Reactor. It is shown that for safety reasons in case of deblading, a horizontal shaft aligned with the reactor vessel is recommended for the turbomachinery.This paper presents simulations of different scenarii performed with CATHARE code:
(a) Turbine deblading with and without reactor trip. In these calculations, a pessimistic assumption has been made: all turbine blades break off.
(b) Total flow blockage. The flow area is entirely blocked by the turbine blades.
(c) Partial flow blockage. Previous conclusions consider the worst cases of deblading and total flow blockage. An intermediate case based on a partial deblading has also been performed.
CATHARE results illustrate that the loss of turbine blades is accompanied by abrupt changes in the Power Conversion System and reactor flow conditions: large axial pressure drop, reverse flow through the core and high rate de-pressurization.  相似文献   

4.
An alternative way of reprocessing nuclear fuel by hydrometallurgy could be using treatment with molten salts, particularly fluoride melts. Moreover, one of the six concepts chosen for GEN IV nuclear reactors (Technology Roadmap - http://gif.inel.gov/roadmap/) is the molten salt reactor (MSR). The originality of the concept is the use of molten salts as liquid fuel and coolant. During the running of the reactor, fission products, particularly lanthanides, accumulate in the melt and have to be eliminated to optimise reactor operation. This study concerns the feasibility of the separation actinides-lanthanides-solvent by selectively electrodepositing the elements to be separated on an inert (Mo, Ta) or a reactive (Ni) cathodic substrate in molten fluoride media. The main results of this work lead to the conclusions that:
The solvents to be used for efficient separation must be fluoride media containing lithium as cation.
Inert substrates are suitable for actinide/lanthanide separation; nickel substrate is more suitable for the extraction of lanthanides from the solvent, owing to the depolarisation occurring in the cathodic process through alloy formation.
  相似文献   

5.
Chemical interactions between UO2 fuel and Zircaloy cladding up to 2350°C are described. UO2/Zircaloy single effects tests have been performed with short LWR fuel rod segments in inert gas and under oxidizing conditions. The reaction kinetics of molten Zircaloy cladding with solid UO2 fuel has been investigated with UO2 crucibles containing molten Zircaloy. The UO2/Zircaloy reactions obey parabolic rate laws. The oxygen uptake by solid Zircaloy due to chemical interaction with UO2 occurs nearly as quickly as that from the reaction with steam or oxygen.To study the competing effects of the external and internal cladding oxidation under realistic boundary conditions and the influence of the uncontrolled temperature escalation due to the exothermic steam/Zircaloy reaction on the maximum cladding temperature, single rod and bundle experiments have been performed. Electrically heated fuel rod simulators, including absorber rod material (Ag, In, Cd alloy), guide tubes and grid spacers are used. The maximum measured cladding temperature during the temperature escalation was about 2200°C. The failure temperature of the absorber rods and the extent of bundle damage depends on the guide tube material (Zircaloy or stainless steel) and varies between 1200 and 1350°C. The molten materials and liquid reaction products can relocate and form large coherent lumps on solidification, which may result in complete blockage of the fuel rod bundle cross section. In the future, 7 × 7 bundle experiments of 2 m overall length will be performed in the new CORA facility to study, in addition, the influence of quenching on fuel rod integrity.  相似文献   

6.
Dissolution of UO2 crucibles by molten Zircaloy-4 (Zry) was investigated in the temperature range of 2,223-2,373 K and for specimens having UO2/Zry mole ratios between 7 and 18.2. The uranium concentration in the Zry melt rapidly increased during initial reaction time and approached saturated values, depending on reaction temperature and UO2/Zry mole ratio. Kinetics of uranium concentration increase in the melt was analyzed based on a natural convection mass transfer model that takes into account the change of contact surface area/melt volume ratio with reaction time. The saturated uranium concentration in the Zry melt was inversely proportional to the U02/Zry mole ratio. An empirical correlation of saturated uranium concentration in the Zry melt was obtained as a function of UO2/Zry mole ratios and reaction temperature. This study of the empirical correlation was intended to estimate maximum UO2 fuel dissolution by molten Zry cladding during severe fuel damage accidents for three different reactor type fuels.  相似文献   

7.
The severe fuel damage (SFD) research at Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe started with the single rod experiments [Hagen, S., Malauschek, H., Peck, S.O., Wallenfels, K.P., 1983. Temperature Escalation in PWR Fuel Rod Simulator Bundles due to the Zircaloy/steam Reaction Test ESBU-1. Test Results Report, FZK-3508] already before the TMI-2 accident revealed that the knowledge on accident initiation and progression was scarce. The general focus on primary circuit research was the understanding of the relevant processes and their interactions, and of possibilities for countermeasures. However, even today, the most prominent countermeasure, the flooding of a degraded core, is not yet completely understood, namely the influence of adverse effects such as enhanced core degradation and hydrogen spikes under the most probable scenarios.Our work shows that the design basis accident procedures of core reflood can be extended to peak core temperatures of approx. 2200 K, if sufficient reflood mass flow rate can be supplied. Assuming an initial core heat-up rate of 0.5 K/s, this gives only approx. 12 min additional time with respect to design basis accidents (DBA) cases, but moreover a strategy for a successful core reflood is seen to be feasible before a large in-core pool is formed, that might be uncoolable.  相似文献   

8.
9.
10.
This research is focused on using Thorium-Plutonium MOX fuel in the inner fuel pins of the CANDU fuel bundles for plutonium incineration and reduction of uranium demand and to reduce coolant void reactivity. The delayed neutron fraction and the power distribution amongst the fuel elements of the fuel bundle have been considered as main safety parameters.The 700 MWe Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR-700) was selected as a case study. The inner eight UO2 fuel pins of the ACR-700 fuel bundle are replaced by Thorium-Plutonium MOX fuel pins in the proposed design with 3% reactor grade PuO2. This amount represents 23.4 w/o of the fuel in the bundle. The outer two fuel rings (35 pins) enrichment is reduced from 2.1 w/o U-235 to 2 w/o U-235. The simulation using MCNP6 showed that about 27% reduction of uranium demand can be achieved. The proposed fuel bundle eliminate the use of burnable poisons in the central pin that was used for negative coolant void reactivity and more reduction in the coolant void reactivity was achieved (about 3.5 mk less than the reference fuel bundle). The power distribution throughout the fuel bundle is more flat in the proposed fuel bundle. Use of this fuel bundle reduces the delayed neutron fraction from 540 pcm in the reference case to 480 pcm in the proposed case.  相似文献   

11.
D. Magallon   《Nuclear Engineering and Design》2006,236(19-21):1998-2009
The formation of corium debris as the result of fuel-coolant interaction (energetic or not) has been studied experimentally in the FARO and KROTOS facilities operated at JRC-Ispra between 1991 and 1999. Experiments were performed with 3–177 kg of UO2–ZrO2 and UO2–ZrO2–Zr melts, quenched in water at depth between 1 and 2 m, and pressure between 0.1 and 5.0 MPa. The effect of various parameters such as melt composition, system pressure, water depth and subcooling on the quenching processes, debris characteristics and thermal load on bottom head were investigated, thus, giving a large palette of data for realistic reactor situations.Available data related to debris coolability aspects in particular are:
• Geometrical configuration of the collected debris.
• Partition between loose and agglomerated (“cake”) debris.
• Particle size distribution with and without energetic interaction.
These data are synthesised in the present contribution.  相似文献   

12.
The main objective of the European Validation of the Integral Code ASTEC (EVITA) project is to distribute the severe accident integral code ASTEC to European partners in order to apply the validation strategy issued from the VASA project (4th EC FWP). Partners evaluate the code capability through validation on reference experiments and plant applications accounting for severe accident management measures, and compare results with reference codes.The basis version V0 of ASTEC (Accident Source Term Evaluation Code)—commonly developed and basically validated by GRS and IRSN—was made available in late 2000 for the EVITA partners on their individual platforms. Users’ training was performed by IRSN and GRS. The code portability on different computers was checked to be correct. A “hot line” assistance was installed continuously available for EVITA code users. The actual version V1 has been released to the EVITA partners end of June 2002. It allows to simulate the front-end phase by two new modules:
• for reactor coolant system 2-phase simplified thermal hydraulics (5-equation approach) during both front-end and core degradation phases,
• for core degradation, based on structure and main models of ICARE2 (IRSN) reference mechanistic code for core degradation and on other simplified models.
Next priorities are clearly identified: code consolidation in order to increase the robustness, extension of all plant applications beyond the vessel lower head failure and coupling with fission product modules, and continuous improvements of users’ tools.As EVITA has very successfully made the first step into the intention to provide end-users (like utilities, vendors and licensing authorities) with a well validated European integral code for the simulation of severe accidents in NPPs, the EVITA partners strongly recommend to continue validation, benchmarking and application of ASTEC. This work will continue in Severe Accident Research Network (SARNET) in the 6th Framework Programme where ASTEC plays a key role as the reference European integral code.  相似文献   

13.
The concept of “containment” is to provide a series of physical barriers between the radioactive products of the fission process and the public. All nuclear reactors have several such barriers and LMFBRs have more than most. These barriers are, successively:
1. fuel, which retains fission products;
2. fuel cladding, which encloses the fuel;
3. sodium coolant, which absorbs fission products released through fuel caldding;
4. primary coolant boundary, which has energy absorption and leakage control capabilities;
5. containment building, hereafter referred to as containment, which provides the final engineered barrier for control of radioactive releases;
6. exclusion distance, which provides space for natural attenuation of radioactive releases before reaching the public.
These barriers, along with the design approaches and features which protect their integrity under normal and accident conditions, assure that the public is adequately protected from the potential hazards of radioactivity residing in the core. It is only in the case of hypothesized core disruptive accidents (HCDAs) that these successive barriers can be sufficiently threatened as to pose a significant threat to the public. These HCDAs involve an extremely low probability sequence of successive failures resulting in core cooling imbalances which lead to fuel overheating. Under such conditions, the fuel and cladding barriers can be lost and energy sources can be generated which threaten the primary coolant boundary and containment. This paper addresses current perspectives on containment of HCDAs with emphasis on the approach and programs in the US.  相似文献   

14.
In-reactor experiments were performed in Nuclear Safety Research Reactor of Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute to study the failure behavior of stainless steel clad fuel rods under a simulated reactivity initiated accident (RIA) condition. A single test fuel rod with stainless steel cladding was contained in a capsule filled with water at room temperature and atmospheric pressure and irradiated by pulsing power simulating an RIA. It was revealed through the experiments that the failure mechanism of the stainless steel clad fuel rod was cladding melting, which was different from oxygen-induced embrittlement observed in the Zircaloy clad fuel rod in the same test condition, and the failure threshold energy was determined to be about 240cal/g·UO2 (–1,000 kJ/kg·UO2), which was about 20 cal/g·UO2 (–85 kJ/kg·UO2) lower than that of the Zircaloy clad fuel rod. It was also found that the mechanical energy was generated by explosive vaporization of coolant due to molten fuel-coolant interaction as a consequence of the fuel rod failure accompanying fuel pellet fragmentation at an energy deposition of nearly 380 cal/g·UO2 (–1,600 kJ/kg·UO2) or more.  相似文献   

15.
The paper summarizes the dominant effects which finally ensure the core coolability of a pressurized water reactor in a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA).The main results are summarized as follows:
• — The cooling effect of the two-phase mixture which is intensified during reflooding increases temperature differences on the cladding tube circumference and thus limits the mean circumferential burst strains to values of about 50%.
• — An unidirected flow through the fuel rod bundle during the refill and reflooding phases causes maximum cooling channel blockage of about 70%.
• — The coolability of deformed fuel elements can be maintained up to flow blockages of about 90%.
All effects investigated indicate that in a LOCA no impairment of core coolability and public safety has to be expected.  相似文献   

16.
As part of the re-inspection of the reactor pressure vessel of the nuclear power plant, the low-frequency-eddy current technique was implemented during the 1995 outage. Since then, this inspection technique and the testing equipment have seen steady further development. Therefore, optimization of the entire testing system, including qualification based on the 1995 results, was conducted. The eddy current testing system was designed as a ten-channel test system with sensors having separate transmitter and receiver coils. The first qualification of the testing technique and sensors was performed using a single-channel system; a second qualification was then carried out using the new testing electronics. The sensor design allows for a simultaneous detection of surface and subsurface flaws. This assumes that testing is performed simultaneously using four frequencies. Data analysis and evaluation are performed using a digital multi-frequency regression analysis technique The detection limits determined using this technique led to the definition of the following recording limits for testing in which the required signal-to-noise ratio of 6 dB was reliably observed.
• Detection of surface connected longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• notch, 3 mm deep and 10 mm long, for weave bead cladding;
• notch, 2 mm deep and 20 mm long, for strip weld cladding.
• Detection of embedded planar longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• ligament of 7 mm for 8 mm clad thickness and 3 mm;
• ligament for 4 mm clad thickness, notch starting at the carbon steel base material with a length of 20 mm.
• Detection of embedded volumetric longitudinal and transverse flaws:
• 3 mm diameter side-drilled hole (SDH) for 8 mm clad thickness; ligament, 4 mm. For 4 mm clad thickness: diameter, 2 mm SDH; ligament, 2 mm. All SDHs are 55 mm deep.

Article Outline

1. Problem
2. Objective
3. Execution and results
3.1. Test instrument and electronics
3.2. Performance demonstration (qualification)
3.3. Summary of results and assessment of the qualification
3.4. Flaws open to the surface
3.5. Planar flaws in the cladding and sub-clad flaws
3.6. Volumetric flaws in the clad
3.7. Additional evaluations
4. Qualification results
5. Results from the 1999 outage

1. Problem

The reactor pressure vessel is equipped with a stainless steel (austenitic) cladding for corrosion protection. This cladding can only protect if no flaws are present at the surface or in the volume. The verification of the integrity of the cladding is currently conducted using state-of-the-art ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonic testing has an excellent capacity of proof for these types of flaws, but it generally cannot distinguish between flaws at the clad surface, in the clad volume, or at the clad-to-base material interface. Using the low-frequency (LF)-eddy current technique, these differences can be documented. For this reason, the LF-eddy current technique was developed and also supported by those who employ diverse testing technology in addition to ultrasonic testing for this type of testing.

2. Objective

The goal of the qualification described in this paper was the optimization and verification of the test procedure and test equipment based on the test systems currently used and, in addition, implementation of the results achieved with the newly built WS98 test electronics, a ten-channel eddy current testing system. The completion of the tasks should be performed in accordance with the ENIQ qualification guidelines. Following the successful qualification, the test system will be utilized during the 1999 reactor pressure vessel outage at the Stade nuclear power plant (KKS). The project started in August 1998, leaving approximately 6 months for the set-up of the equipment, system performance demonstration (qualification), and to compile the required documentation.

3. Execution and results

The following essential parameters for the qualification of the testing technique were determined by the test situation:
• sensor size of, maximum, 40 mm×40 mm×30 mm (L×W×H) for NF-absolute sensors;
• sensor size of, maximum, 60 mm×30 mm×30 mm for T/R sensors;
• frequency range, 0.5–20 kHz;
• effective coil width, ≥10 mm (6 dB drop);
• gain (amplification), up to 100 dB;
• long-term stability of the test instrument and electronics.

3.1. Test instrument and electronics

The eddy current instrument is designed for single-channel or multi-channel automated testing of the surface areas of piping systems, pressure vessels, and forgings for both mobile testing services in the field and also for use in stationary facilities in the area of manufacturing testing or inservice inspections.The instrument can easily be adapted to the requirements of the respective test situation due to its modular design. This is accomplished by increasing the testing electronics to the necessary number of sensor and/or frequency channels.The design of the eddy current electronics and the data flow can be seen in Fig. 1.  相似文献   

17.
The results of a reactivity-initiated accident experiment, designated RIA-ST-4, are discussed and analyzed with regard to molten fuel-coolant interaction (MFCI). In this experiment, extensive amounts of molten UO2 fuel and zircaloy cladding were produced and fragmented upon mixing with the coolant. Coolant pressurization up to 35 MPa and coolant overheating in excess of 940 K occurred after fuel rod failure. The initial coolant conditions were similar to those in boiling water reactors during a hot startup (that is, coolant pressure of 6.45 MPa, coolant temperature of 538 K, and coolant flow rate of 85 cm3/s). It is concluded that the high coolant pressure recorded in the RIA-ST-4 experiment was caused by an MFCI and was not due to gas release from the test rod at failure, Zr/water reaction, of UO2 fuel vapor pressure. The high coolant temperature indicated the presence of superheated steam, which may have formed during the expansion of the working fluid back to the initial coolant pressure; yet, the thermal-to-mechanical energy conversion ratio is estimated to be only about 0.3%.  相似文献   

18.
The 2006 CHF look-up table   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
CHF look-up tables are used widely for the prediction of the critical heat flux (CHF). The CHF look-up table is basically a normalized data bank for a vertical 8 mm water-cooled tube. The 2006 CHF look-up table is based on a database containing more than 30,000 data points and provides CHF values at 24 pressures, 20 mass fluxes, and 23 qualities, covering the full range of conditions of practical interest. In addition, the 2006 CHF look-up table addresses several concerns with respect to previous CHF look-up tables raised in the literature. The major improvements of the 2006 CHF look-up table are:
• An enhanced quality of the database (improved screening procedures, removal of clearly identified outliers and duplicate data).
• An increased number of data in the database (an addition of 33 recent data sets).
• A significantly improved prediction of CHF in the subcooled region and the limiting quality region.
• An increased number of pressure and mass flux intervals (thus increasing the CHF entries by 20% compared to the 1995 CHF look-up table).
• An improved smoothness of the look-up table (the smoothness was quantified by a smoothness index).
A discussion of the impact of these changes on the prediction accuracy and table smoothness is presented. The 2006 CHF look-up table is characterized by a significant improvement in accuracy and smoothness.  相似文献   

19.
The code system, SEMER, was recently developed to evaluate the economic impact of various nuclear reactors and associated innovations. Models for nearly all fossil energy-based systems were also included to provide a basis for cost comparisons.Essentially, SEMER includes three types of model libraries: the global model, for a rapid estimation of various nuclear and fossil energy-based systems, the detailed models, for the finer cost evaluation of individual components and circuits in a PWR type of reactor and the fuel cycle models, for PWRS, HTRs and FBRs, allowing the cost estimations related to all the steps in the nuclear fuel cycle, including reprocessing and disposal.This paper summarises our on-going investigations on new developments in, and on the validation of, the SEMER system.Details of the modelling principles, and the results of validation carried out in the context of an EDF/CEA Joint Protocol Agreement, are also presented.First results of this validation are highly encouraging:
• Relative errors for the total kWh or overnight and investment costs are less than 5% for large PWR systems operating in France or other countries.
• These errors are less than 3% for small-sized compact PWRs and they are of the order of 4–7% for HTRs (as compared to IAEA estimations).
• For fossil energy-based power plants, the relative error, even with slightly different cost breakdown between SEMER and that of existing installations, is from 5 to 20%.
• Similarly, errors on the nuclear fuel cycle costs are about 1–4%, compared to published reference values.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The models
2.1. The global models
2.2. The detailed models
2.3. The fuel cycle model
3. Cost modelling principles
3.1. Input data and output
3.1.1. Input data
3.1.2. Output
3.1.3. Interest during construction
3.2. An illustrative example of power cost calculations
4. The fuel cycle model
4.1. An illustrative example of fuel cycle calculations
5. Validation
5.1. Validation results for nuclear reactors
5.2. More recent validation of operating power plants
5.3. Circuits, tubes and components
5.4. Fuel cycle costs comparisons
6. Conclusions
References

1. Introduction

This paper describes some of the salient features of the economic evaluation models, integrated in CEA’s code system, SEMER (Système d’Evaluation et de Modélisation Economique de Réacteurs).The basic aim of this development is to furnish top management and project leaders a simple tool for cost evaluations enabling the choice of competitive technological options.In the particular context of CEA’s R&D innovative programme, it was imperative to include this economic dimension in order to assess the economic interest of the proposed innovations and to search for other promising areas of R&D, leading to nuclear power cost reductions.SEMER is actually used in the form of a totally machine-independent and user friendly interface in the JAVA language.

2. The models

There are three distinct categories of models in the SEMER system.

2.1. The global models

These models are designed for a quick overall economic estimation. Current version of SEMER includes models for:
Nuclear power plants, such as PWR of the 1400 MWe type (double confinement and four loops), PWR of the 900 MWe type (single confinement, three loops), HTGR (high temperature, gas-cooled reactor), LTR (integral nuclear reactor for heat production), NP (compact PWR) and PWR-C (modular integral PWR such as the SIR concept).
Conventional, fossil energy-based power plants, such as pulverised (or fluidised bed), coal-fired plant, with desulphurisation treatment, oil-fired plant, gas-fired plant and diesel plants of all types. Also included are gas turbine plants, plant with a simple gas turbine, plant with a combined cycle gas turbine (“indoor” and “outdoor” constructions).

2.2. The detailed models

This option allows detailed cost estimations by individual modelling of reactor components, circuits and associated buildings, etc. In the present version, only the following models for PWR are available:
Reactor components, such as civil engineering of associated buildings and structures, reactor vessel, steam generator with U-tubes, steam generator with straight tubes, the pressuriser, primary circuit pumps, the travelling crane, cooling tower, cooling tower with mechanical ventilation, turbine-driven pumps, pump motors, centrifugal pumps, air ejectors, heat exchanger casing, special tubes in stainless steel and special tubes in black steel, with internal coating in stainless steel.
Reactor circuits, including: (1) basic circuits, such as primary circuit connecting the core, pressuriser, primary pumps and steam generator and secondary circuit connecting the steam generators and turbines; and (2) auxiliary circuits, such as steam generators blow-off circuit, steam generator emergency feed-water circuit, confinement spray system, chemical and volumetric control system, emergency core cooling system, component cooling system, water make-up and boron circuit, nuclear sampling system, drain, vent and exhaust circuits, residual heat removal system, effluent control and rejection system and diverse other circuits inside and outside the reactor building.
For the economic evaluation of an innovative PWR, the detailed models allow to take into account the specificities of the new concept and thus bring corrections to the global model, available in the SEMER library and considered having the closest analogies to the innovative PWR to be evaluated. This approach was used in Nisan et al. (2002) to evaluate the AP-600.

2.3. The fuel cycle model

In addition to the above, SEMER also incorporates a detailed model for the fuel cycle cost calculations of a nuclear reactor, treating all the stages of the nuclear fuel cycle from ore extraction to ultimate disposal, with the following options:
• Uranium oxide (UOX) cores.
• 100% mixed, uranium–plutonium oxide (MOX) cores.
• Cores with first loading in UOX, then equilibrium core in MOX.
• Mixed cores with x% MOX fuelled assemblies (under development).
• HTR cores and fast reactor (EFR type) cores.
Several options regarding the treatment of the fuel cycle front- and back-ends are also available:
• Global treatment as in the IAEA WREBUS study (IAEA, 1992).
• Detailed treatment as in the OECD study (OECD, 1994). This is the default option.
• A combination of the above, with a semi-detailed calculations, including the specific treatment and costs for B and C type of wastes, as used by the French Ministry of Industry, DIGEC and by EDF (DIGEC, 1997).
• The CEA model, derived from feed-back of experience for front- and back-end operations.
It should be noted that the standard OECD option includes all the steps in the fuel cycle from the mine to final disposal. The WREBUS option only considers a global value for the fuel cycle back-end. The EDF model (detailed in Table 10) is in between. Finally, in the CEA model, all the costs concerning the front-end, the fabrication and enrichment and the back-end (reprocessing, then final disposal) are expressed as polynomial expressions derived from the costs of a large number of real cases.

3. Cost modelling principles

The basic principle governing the development of models in the SEMER system is the fact that, for most projects, especially in their preliminary phases, it is sufficient to first make a relative cost estimation by the simplest and fastest methods available. The results obtained are then further refined in the final stages of the project when relevant choices of options and technologies are almost fixed. The only condition is that consistent estimating techniques be used so that alternatives can be compared on the same basis, and comparisons can also be made between competing projects.This principle was first used in the chemical and petrochemical industries where continued development over several decades has produced simple but powerful methods for cost evaluations (Popper, 1970).These methods were adapted to nuclear reactors and further developed at CEA during the last 20 years. They have been successfully applied, in particular for the cost assessment of nuclear submarine reactors, operating large-sized PWRs, new small- and medium-sized reactor concepts as well as for a variety of technologies and components, utilising nuclear or fossil energies.The basic steps involved in the development of such methods are:
1. The power plant cost is first carefully decomposed into several “cost modules”. This method was first proposed in the early 1970s for chemical plant cost estimations (Guthrie and Grace, 1970). An estimating module represents a group of cost elements (or items) having similar characteristics and relationships. Each of these elements can be made to represent a given function in the overall module (e.g. site acquisition and development, major process equipment such as a heat exchanger, a pressure vessel, etc.).
2. A detailed study is then made to make an inventory of the various generic models1 which bear a sufficient number of analogies with the module that one would like to assess. Thus, for example, the cost evaluation model for the PWR pressure vessel was developed from the available models for the stainless steel lined high pressure reservoirs used in the industry.
3. The cost Ci of an element i in a given module is then mathematically expressed in the form of simple equations of the type:
(1)
Ci=Ai+(Bi×Pin)
where A, B and n are the so-called “adjustment coefficients” and P is power or capacity (electric power of a reactor, for example).
4. The adjustment coefficients are then obtained by applying well-known mathematical techniques (a least-squares fit of a data base, for example) for a large number of values for P.
5. To qualify the algorithms, developed as above, the models are more finely tuned from the results of published data, taking into account the use of field materials, field labour and other industrial factors.
6. Finally, a validation of the model is undertaken by comparison with the “real” values from existing installations.
The SEMER system was basically developed for the assessment of innovations in reactor systems, made in the context of the French Nuclear Power Programme. The adjustment coefficients were then obtained from available data bases for experimental, operating or nuclear submarine PWRs and the fossil energy-based electricity producing systems. This is the main reason that the basic costs of most items need to be expressed in French Francs (FF) which are then converted into Euros or US dollars. Some information on other reactor types, e.g. HTRs, was also obtained from external sources such as the IAEA. In its current form, SEMER remains nonetheless highly oriented towards PWR type of technology.However, because of the inherent generic nature of the built in models, they can be easily adapted to treat other reactor systems. One could, for example, use the model for combined cycle gas turbines, to develop part of the models for HTRs with direct cycles.

3.1. Input data and output

3.1.1. Input data
Efforts were made to harmonise the input and output data for all power plant types, with only minor and easily comprehensible modifications in the input data.Examples of input data panels, for the global models of a nuclear reactor and a fossil fuelled plant, are summarised in Table 1.  相似文献   

20.
In the framework of the French V/HTR fuel development and qualification program, the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA) and AREVA are conducting R&D projects covering the mastering of UO2 coated particle and fuel compact fabrication technology. To fulfill this task, a review of past knowledge, of existing technologies and a preliminary laboratory-scale work program have been conducted with the aim of retrieving the know-how on HTR coated particle and compact manufacture:
• The different stages of UO2 kernel fabrication GSP process have been reviewed, reproduced and improved.
• The experimental conditions for the chemical vapor deposition of coatings have been defined on dummy kernels and development of innovative characterization methods has been carried out.
• Former CERCA compacting process has been reviewed and updated.
In parallel, an experimental manufacturing line for coated particles, named GAIA, and a compacting line based on former CERCA compacting experience have been designed, constructed and are in operation since early 2005 at CEA Cadarache and CERCA Romans, respectively. These two facilities constitute the CAPRI line (CEA and AREVA PRoduction Integrated line).The major objectives of the CAPRI line are:
• to recover and validate past knowledge,
• to produce representative HTR TRISO fuel meeting industrial standards,
• to permit the optimization of reference fabrication processes for kernels and coatings defined previously at a laboratory-scale and the investigation of alternative and innovative fuel design (UCO kernel, ZrC coating),
• to test alternative compact process options and
• to fabricate and characterize fuel required for irradiation and qualification purpose.
This paper presents the status of progress of R&D conducted on HTR fuel particles and compact manufacture by early 2005 and the potential of the laboratory-scale HTR fuel CAPRI line.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号