Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, the number of complications associated with the laparoscopic technique, and the effect of leaving a macroscopically normal-looking appendix in place. DESIGN: Three prospective protocols. SETTING: Three departments of surgery, one in Norway and two in Sweden. SUBJECTS: 1043 patients aged 15 years or over. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who were to be operated on. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, and histological appearance of removed appendices, and outcome whether or not the patient was operated on. RESULTS: 819 patients had appendectomies (61% laparoscopically and 39% by conversion to open operation) with a total complication rate of 10%. In 211 patients a diagnostic laparoscopy was done as a single procedure. There were 181 women in this group and 86 of them had gynaecological disorders. The complication rate was 2% among these 211 patients and after a follow up of two years no patients had been readmitted for appendicectomy. 13 patients were subjected to other open procedures. The overall mortality was 0.4%. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy is safe and can be recommended in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, particularly in women. A macroscopically normal-looking appendix can be left in place.     

Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND: High error rates are reported in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. This study was undertaken to discover what additional value laparoscopy has in the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: From April 1995 to November 1996, a diagnostic laparoscopy, before open appendicectomy, was performed in 100 consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Appendicectomy was performed only if the appendix showed signs of inflammation at laparoscopy or if the appendix could not be visualized. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were spared an appendicectomy, and in half of them a new diagnosis was established during laparoscopy. The rate of misdiagnosis was 41% in female patients of reproductive age and 8% in male patients. There were no cases of missed appendicitis in this trial, and all removed appendices showed signs of inflammation at histology. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to rely on the diagnosis made at laparoscopy. Its use for establishing diagnosis before appendicectomy in women of reproductive age is recommended.     

Management of ingested foreign bodies within the appendix: a case report with review of the literature

A case is reported of an elective appendectomy in a patient with known ingestion of a sharp foreign body. The metal drill bit was ingested unintentionally 3 months before presentation at our institution. Plain abdominal films demonstrated the foreign body in the right lower abdominal quadrant. Because the gold dental drill bit was sharp and thought to be lodged in the terminal ileum or cecum, an attempt was made to remove the object during colonoscopy. This attempt was unsuccessful because no drill bit could be detected in the colon or terminal ileum. A laparoscopic exploration was performed, and the foreign body was found to lie in the appendix, after bowel manipulation under fluoroscopic guidance and with direct laparoscopic visualization. A laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was performed. On pathologic examination the drill bit was embedded in the tip of the appendix with signs of intramucosal acute inflammation. Management and indication for surgery of foreign bodies in the appendix are discussed, and we review the related literature. This is the second reported case of a dental drill bit in the appendix causing appendicitis.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Ever since laparoscopy was first applied to the treatment of appendicitis, a controversy has existed as to whether the acknowledged benefits of a minimally invasive approach warrant its preference over the conventional treatment, which historically has had relatively low morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine if laparoscopic appendectomy should be performed preferentially in cases where surgeons are not limited by technical constraints. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 112 patients operated on for suspected appendicitis from June 1995 to July 1996. Forty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and 64 had conventional open appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed using a three-trocar technique and the endoscopic stapler. Results: The histopathological diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed in 82.6% of cases. Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy reduced length of hospital stay (1.54 versus 4.09 days; p < 0.0001) compared to conventional open appendectomy, with no significant difference in hospital cost ($6430 versus $6669; p = ns). Although the total OR time was longer in the laparoscopic group (75.8 versus 60.2 min; p < 0.0001), laparoscopy resulted in both a reduction in length of stay (2.17 versus 6.27 days; p < 0.0001) and hospital cost ($7506 versus $10,504; p < 0.02) for cases of perforated appendicitis. Conversion to open appendectomy was performed in 6% of patients, all of whom had perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that most cases of acute appendicitis with suspected perforation could be managed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay and hospital costs in patients with perforated appendicitis.     

A four-year experience with laparoscopy in the management of appendicitis

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to determine the influences of laparoscopy in the management and outcome of patients with appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 154 consecutive patients who were treated for suspected appendicitis. The pre-operative diagnosis included appendicitis, right lower quadrant pain of unknown etiology, and generalized peritonitis. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was used in 108 patients, including 70 laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and 31 LAs converted to open appendectomy (OA). Forty-six patients had OA. The average operating time for LA was 74.3 minutes and 48.8 minutes with OA. Postoperative complications for LA (7%) included 1 trochar wound hemorrhage, 2 wound infections, and 2 intra-abdominal sepsis; and for OA (9%) were 1 post-operative intra-abdominal hemorrhage, 4 wound infections, 1 wound dehiscence, and 1 intra-abdominal sepsis. Post-operative stay for LA averaged 2.5 days and for OA averaged 4.5 days (P = .0049). LA patients had a considerably faster return to work and/or normal activity than OA patients (P = .00065). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy influenced the management of 29% of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. LA resulted in shorter hospitalization and a more rapid return to work and/or normal activity than OA.     

Perceived side effects and benefits of coronary angioplasty in the early recovery period

BACKGROUND/AIM: Appendicitis and its complications remain a common problem affecting patients of all age groups. Foreign bodies are a rare cause of appendicitis. We tried to define potentially dangerous foreign bodies that may cause appendicitis and summarize general guidelines for their clinical management. METHODS: A 100-year literature review including 256 cases of ingested foreign bodies within the appendix with emphasis on: (1) objects that are more prone to cause appendicitis or appendiceal perforation; (2) foreign bodies that are radiopaque and may be detected during follow-up with plain abdominal films, and (3) guidelines for clinical management. RESULTS: Complications usually occur with sharp, thin, stiff, pointed and long objects. The majority of these objects are radiopaque. An immediate attempt should be made to remove a risky object by gastroscopy. If this fails, clinical follow-up with serial abdominal radiographs should be obtained. If the anatomical position of the object appears not to change and, most commonly, remains in the right lower abdominal quadrant, an attempt at colonoscopic removal is indicated. If this is unsuccessful, laparoscopic exploration with fluoroscopic guidance should be carried out to localize and remove the objects either by ileotomy, colotomy, or by appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Foreign bodies causing appendicitis are rare. However, if stiff or pointed objects get into the appendiceal lumen they have a high risk for appendicitis or perforation. These foreign bodies are almost always radiopaque.     

Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast

PURPOSE: To quantify how frequently mesenteric adenitis clinically mimics appendicitis and to determine its appearance at computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 651 consecutive patients with an admission diagnosis of appendicitis were reviewed to determine how often mesenteric adenitis was the discharge diagnosis. The CT scans of a separate group of 18 patients with a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis were reviewed. These patients were part of a group of 100 consecutive patients prospectively evaluated with CT of the appendix for clinically suspected appendicitis. RESULTS: Fifty of 651 patients (7.7%) with an admission diagnosis of appendicitis had a discharge diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis. Mesenteric adenitis constituted 50 of the 252 (19.8%) discharge diagnoses other than appendicitis. All 18 CT scans of mesenteric adenitis showed three or more nodes that measured at least 5 mm in shortest axis clustered in the right lower quadrant, with a normal appendix identified. Eight patients had associated ileal or ileocecal wall thickening. CONCLUSION: Mesenteric adenitis is an important clinical mimic of appendicitis. It appears at CT as clustered, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes with a normal appendix, and there may be associated ileitis or ileocolitis noted.     

Sexual function before and after transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

The authors describe a case of acute diverticulitis of the appendix presenting as an inflammatory mass in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. The histologic and clinical findings are discussed. This uncommon condition may mimic acute appendicitis, but in most instances it departs from typical appendicitis for later age of appearance, more indolent clinical course and increased tendency to perforation. In these cases the disease may progress with subacute interstitial inflammation, with or without abscess formation, and present as a tumor-like mass of the cecum.     

Can we recognize the pathological character of the appendix during laparoscopy? Prospective study: 81 cases

In a prospective study of 81 patients, the appendix was photographed during a laparoscopy performed for pain in the right iliac fossa. An appendicectomy was performed in 65 patients, for the remaining 16, another cause for the pain was found and the appendix was left in place. The evaluation of the photographed appendix was formed afterwards by a group of 10 surgeons and compared with the histopathological results. In 20 cases (30%) the appendix was normal. In 7 (10%) minimal mucosal inflammation was found and in 38 (60%) acute appendicitis. All the surgeons correctly recognised acute appendicitis. The accuracy of recognition of a normal appendix was 70% overall, and the maximum risk of leaving an early form of appendicitis to evolve was 14%. We propose not removing an appendix judged to be normal during laparoscopy if no other cause for the pain is found. A short course of antibiotics would cover the low risk of allowing a very early appendicitis to develop.     

Right-sided diverticulitis: new diagnostic and therapeutic aspects

Because of its rarity in the Western World, diverticulitis of the ascending colon is often not taken into account in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant or is misdiagnosed as appendicitis. Of five patients who were treated for right-side diverticulitis in our hospital between April 1995 and April 1996, one underwent right hemicolectomy and one laparoscopic diverticulectomy. In three cases we succeeded with antibiotics alone. In three cases the diagnosis was made on the basis of CT-scan, prompted by peridiverticular changes. In one case the diagnosis was made at laparoscopy and confirmed by CT. In one case diagnosis and therapy were carried out only by laparoscopy. From the moment of diagnosis the average stay in hospital was twelve days and no complications occurred. During an average follow-up time of twelve months, all patients remained free of pain. On the basis of the case reports and a literature review we discuss the diagnostic value of CT and laparoscopy as well as the benefit of conservative therapy, which to us--in contrast to other authors--seems appropriate at least for the first bout of uncomplicated diverticulitis.     

Autocatalytic processing of pro-papaya proteinase IV is prevented by crowding of the active-site cleft

BACKGROUND: To establish the value of saline-filled appendiceal ultrasonography in the the diagnosis of clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. METHODS: Saline-filled ultrasonography was performed in 43 patients with an equivocal clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. RESULTS: Sonography diagnosed 31 of 32 patients without acute appendicitis (97%). A normal appendix was visualized in 15 patients (47%), and we identified a normal appendix in 15 of 22 patients (68%) in whom the colon was cleansed with Golytely(R). Sonography diagnosed 10 of 11 patients with acute appendicitis (91%). In three of 10 patients, the findings corresponded to sonographic pitfalls. CONCLUSION: Saline-filled appendiceal ultrasonography enables the detection of a normal appendix and may overcome sonographic pitfalls in acute appendicitis.     

The cul-de-sac approach for appendectomy

Appendectomy through the peritoneal cul-de-sac by a low transverse incision as described herein is perfectly safe and practical. It is also easier and esthetically superior to appendectomy through other surgical approaches and could be routinely used in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. It is particularly valuable in female patients in whom the pelvic organs may need exploration during appendectomy and for whom the postoperative esthetic result may be most gratifying.     

Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis?

OBJECTIVE: To better define the effectiveness of abdominal computed tomographic scanning (ACTS) in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven patients with appendicitis in the differential diagnosis, whose clinical findings were insufficient to perform surgery or to discharge from the hospital, during a 14-month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of ACTS, rate of appendectomies that show no appendicitis (negative appendectomy rate), and frequency of ACTS as a definitive diagnostic test. RESULTS: Forty-nine of the 50 patients with appendicitis were correctly diagnosed by ACTS. Forty-three of the 47 patients without appendicitis were correctly diagnosed by ACTS. Positive predictive value was 92%, negative predictive value was 98%, and accuracy was 96%. The ACTS group had a negative appendectomy rate of 5.8% (3/52), lower than the hospital rate of 14% for the preceding 3 years. The ACTS established an alternative diagnosis in 16 patients, allowed 10 other patients to be discharged early or not admitted, and was the critical diagnostic test in 30 of the patients with appendicitis. Therefore, the ACTS played a definitive role in the treatment of 56 (57.7%) of the 97 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTS was an accurate test in the diagnosis of appendicitis and was of significant benefit in 57.7% of the patients studied. However, it was difficult to predict which patients were most likely to benefit. Expanded selective use of ACTS for patients with clinically indeterminate appendicitis may result in a lower negative appendectomy rate and fewer patient admissions for observation.     

Does this patient have appendicitis?

Appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain for which prompt diagnosis is rewarded by a marked decrease in morbidity and mortality. The history and physical examination are at least as accurate as any laboratory modality in diagnosing or excluding appendicitis. Those signs and symptoms most helpful in diagnosing or excluding appendicitis are reviewed. The presence of a positive psoas sign, fever, or migratory pain to the right lower quadrant suggests an increased likelihood of appendicitis. Conversely, the presence of vomiting before pain makes appendicitis unlikely. The lack of the classic migration of pain, right lower quadrant pain, guarding, or fever makes appendicitis less likely. This article reviews the literature evaluating the operating characteristics of the most useful elements of the history and physical examination for the diagnosis of appendicitis.     

The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy plays a significant role in the evaluation of acute and chronic abdominal pain in the era of therapeutic laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We referred to our personal series of laparoscopy for both acute and chronic abdominal pain. This is a retrospective review of data accumulated prospectively between 1979 and the present. RESULTS: In our series, 387 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopy because of abdominal pain. In a group of 121 patients with acute abdominal pain, a definitive diagnosis was made in 119 cases (98%). Two patients needed laparotomy to confirm the diagnosis; both had a disease process that did not require laparotomy to treat. A definitive therapeutic laparoscopic procedure was performed in 53 cases 944%). In 45 patients (38%), a diagnosis was made that did not require therapeutic laparoscopy or laparotomy to treat. In the remaining 21 patients (17.5%), exploratory laparotomy was needed to treat the condition. In a chronic abdominal pain group of 265 patients, the etiology was established laparoscopically in 201 cases (76%). A definitive therapeutic laparoscopic procedure was performed in 128 patients (48%). There was a normal laparoscopic examination in 64 patients (24%). There was one false negative laparoscopy that required laparotomy to treat 1 month later. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is an accurate modality for the diagnosis of both acute and chronic abdominal pain syndromes. These data support the use of laparoscopy as the primary invasive intervention in patients with acute and chronic abdominal pain.     

Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming the preferred technique for treating acute appendicitis. However, recent literature on adults suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy may increase the risk for postoperative infectious complications in complicated (gangrenous or perforated) cases. This study was undertaken to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children. METHODS: A retrospective review from two institutions was performed for all children treated operatively for complicated appendicitis from January 1994 through November 1996. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases were identified. Twenty-seven children underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, whereas 22 underwent open appendectomy. Seven children underwent conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Operating times and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the laparoscopic and open groups. Postoperative complications developed in 24 children (42.8%). Complications were more frequent after laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy (56% v 18%, P = .002). A postoperative intraabdominal abscess (IAA) developed in 14 children (25%). An IAA occurred in two children after open appendectomy compared with 11 children after laparoscopic appendectomy (9% v 41%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy should be avoided in children who have complicated appendicitis because of the increased risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. The authors propose a prospective, randomized trial to verify this finding.     

Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the accuracy of unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults treated at a community hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Over an 8-month period, 100 consecutive patients with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis were prospectively evaluated. Thin-collimation helical CT scanning was performed after administration of enteric contrast material. CT interpretations were correlated with surgical pathology (45 patients) and clinical follow-up (55 patients). RESULTS: The findings of 33 CT scans were interpreted as positive for appendicitis (29 true-positives and four false-positives), and the findings of 67 were interpreted as negative for appendicitis (66 true-negatives and one false-negative). Sensitivity was 97%, specificity was 94%, accuracy was 95%, positive predictive value was 88%, and negative predictive value was 99%. In the 67 CT scans with negative findings for appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis was made for 36 patients (54%). CONCLUSION: Unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for the evaluation of appendicitis can be implemented in a community hospital. In our study, such imaging achieved excellent accuracy.     

Appendiceal mucocele. Contraindication to laparoscopic appendectomy

Indications and contraindications to laparoscopic surgery continue to be refined. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is frequently selected by patients and surgeons, and clinical studies show it to be a reasonable alternative. In this case study, laparoscopic surgery was used to resect an appendiceal mucocele caused by a nonperforated mucinous adenocarcinoma. Implants of mucinous tumor were found widely disseminated on peritoneal surfaces at laparotomy 9 months later. As a result of this case study, the authors suggest that when an appendiceal mucinous tumor is encountered at laparoscopy, a special situation requiring totally atraumatic appendectomy is indicated. This clinical situation should be considered an indication for conversion to open appendectomy. All appendiceal tumors, including the most benign-appearing adenomas, can result in diffuse peritoneal implantation. This is the first report of an appendiceal mucinous tumor resected by laparoscopy associated with subsequent diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. This patient presentation reaffirms that dissemination of cancer may be associated with laparoscopic resection of structures containing a malignancy.     

The imprinted domain in mouse distal Chromosome 7: reagents for mutagenesis and sequencing

BACKGROUND: Right lower quadrant abdominal pain may pose a diagnostic problem in patients with cystic fibrosis. Abdominal ultrasound examination, used commonly in the diagnostic work-up, may reveal abnormalities of the appendix. However, interpretation of such findings is problematic, because the appearance of the gastrointestinal system during routine examination has not been documented in patients with cystic fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the findings during routine abdominal ultrasound scans in our cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis and in control subjects. METHODS: Abdominal ultrasound scans were performed prospectively during routine clinic visits in a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: Fifty patients aged 10+/-6 years, (range, 0.5-28 years) were examined; 45 had pancreatic insufficiency. Four patients (3 with pancreatic insufficiency) reported right lower quadrant pain at the time of the scan. According to standard ultrasound criteria, the appearance of the appendix was abnormal in 8 patients (16%), 6 had a mucoid appendix, and 2 had a pathologically thickened appendiceal wall. Only 1 of these 8 patients mentioned abdominal pain at the time of the study. Other incidental findings included gallstones (3 patients), intussusception (2 patients), and pancreatic cyst (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities can be observed during routine abdominal ultrasonographic studies in cystic fibrosis. These findings may not be associated with abdominal pain; their clinical relevance needs further investigation.     

Meckel's diverticulum in adults. A 3-decade experience

OBJECTIVE: To review the prevalence, clinic manifestations and characteristics of the adult Meckel's diverticulum in the Hospital Espa?ol de México. BACKGROUND: The Meckel's diverticulum is the most frequent congenital malformation of the gastrointestinal tract. However, only in seldom occasions produces manifestations in adults. METHODS: Retrospective review of 31 years. RESULTS: Meckel's diverticulum was found in only 13 cases. The most common clinical manifestation was pain in the right lower abdominal quadrant; there was not a single case of bleeding. A correct pre surgical diagnosis was done in only one patients. Post surgical course was satisfactory in all patients. CONCLUSION: In adults, the Meckel's diverticulum complications are uncommon, being the most frequent clinical manifestation the pain in the right lower abdominal quadrant and intestinal obstruction.