Crystallization and melting behavior of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate‐co‐6 mol % butylene succinate)

The crystallization, melting behavior, and spherulitic growth kinetics of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate‐co‐6 mol % butylene succinate) [P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS)] were investigated and compared with those of the homopolymer poly(ethylene succinate) (PES) in this work. The crystal structure of P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) was the same as that of neat PES, but the crystallinity decreased slightly because of the incorporation of the butylene succinate content. The glass‐transition temperature decreased slightly for P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) compared to that for neat PES. The melting point of P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) decreased apparently; moreover, the equilibrium melting point was also reduced. Two melting endotherms were found for P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) after isothermal crystallization; this was ascribed to the melting, recrystallization, and remelting mechanism. The spherulitic growth rate of P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) was slower than that of neat PES at a given crystallization temperature. Both neat PES and P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) exhibited a crystallization regime II to III transition; moreover, the crystallization regime transition temperature of P(ES‐co‐6 mol % BS) shifted to a low temperature compared with that of neat PES. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate) copolyester containing ethylene glycol moieties. Part 1: Crystallization kinetics and melting behavior

A copolyester was characterized to have 91 mol% trimethylene terephthalate unit and 9 mol% ethylene terephthalate unit in a random sequence by using ¹³C NMR. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to investigate the isothermal crystallization kinetics in the temperature range (T_c) from 180 to 207 °C. The melting behavior after isothermal crystallization was studied by using DSC and temperature modulated DSC (TMDSC). The exothermic behavior in the DSC and TMDSC curves gives a direct evidence of recrystallization. No exothermic flow and fused double melting peaks at T_c = 204 °C support the mechanism of different morphologies. The Hoffman-Weeks linear plot gave an equilibrium melting temperature of 236.3 °C. The kinetic analysis of the growth rates of spherulites and the morphology change from regular to banded spherulites indicated that there existed a regime II → III transition at 196 °C.     

Crystallization kinetics and crystalline morphology of poly(ethylene naphthalate) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐bibenzoate)

Copolymers of ethylene glycol with 4,4′‐bibenzoic acid and terephthalic acid are known to crystallize rapidly to surprisingly high levels of crystallinity. To understand this unusual behavior, the isothermal crystallization of poly(ethylene bibenzoate‐co‐terephthalate) in the molar ratio 55:45 (PETBB55) was studied. Poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) was included in the study for comparison. The kinetics of isothermal crystallization from the melt and from the amorphous glass was determined using differential thermal analysis. The results were correlated with the crystalline morphology as observed with atomic force microscopy (AFM). Crystallization of PEN exhibited similar kinetics and spherulitic morphology regardless of whether it was cooled from the melt or heated from the glass to the crystallization temperature. The Avrami coefficient was close to 3 for heterogeneous nucleation with 3‐dimensional crystal growth. The copolymer PETBB55 crystallized much faster than did PEN and demonstrated different crystallization habits from the melt and from the glass. From the melt, PETBB55 crystallized in the “normal” way with spherulitic growth and an Avrami coefficient of 3. However, crystallization from the glass produced a granular crystalline morphology with an Avrami coefficient of 2. A quasi‐ordered melt state, close to liquid crystalline but lacking the order of a recognizable mesophase, was proposed to explain the unusual crystallization characteristics of PETBB55. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 98–115, 2002     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly (butylene terephthalate)–poly (ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate‐co‐sebacate) segmented copolyesters

In this paper, two different analytical methods were applied to investigate nonisothermal crystallization behavior of copolyesters prepared by melting transesterification processing from bulk polyesters involving poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary amorphous random copolyester poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate‐co‐sebacate) (PETIS). The results show that the half‐time of crystallization of copolyesters depended on the reaction time and decreased with the content of ternary polyesters in the amorphous segment. The modified Avrami model describes the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics very well. The values of the Avrami exponent range from 2.2503 to 3.7632, and the crystallization kinetics constant ranges from 0.0690 to 0.9358, presenting a mechanism of three‐dimensional spherulitic growth with heterogeneous nucleation. Ozawa analysis, however, failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of copolyesters, especially at higher cooling rate. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1232–1238, 2003     

Miscibility and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and melting behavior of binary crystalline blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) have been investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscope. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) and the measured T_g fit well with the predicted T_g value by the Fox equation and Gordon‐Taylor equation. In addition to that, a single composition‐dependent cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) value can be observed and it decreases nearly linearly with the low T_g component, PTT, which can also be taken as a valid supportive evidence for miscibility. The SEM graphs showed complete homogeneity in the fractured surfaces of the quenched PET/PTT blends, which provided morphology evidence of a total miscibility of PET/PTT blend in amorphous state at all compositions. The polymer–polymer interaction parameter, χ₁₂, calculated from equilibrium melting temperature depression of the PET component was ?0.1634, revealing miscibility of PET/PTT blends in the melting state. The melting crystallization temperature (T_mc) of the blends decreased with an increase of the minor component and the 50/50 sample showed the lowest T_mc value, which is also related to its miscible nature in the melting state. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Isothermal‐crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)

The isothermal crystallization and crystal morphology of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly (ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blends were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and polarized optical microscopy. The commonly used Avrami equation was used to fit the primary stage of isothermal crystallization. The Avrami exponents were evaluated to be in the range of 3.0–3.3 for isothermal crystallization. The subsequent melting endotherms of the blends after isothermal crystallization showed multiple melting peaks. The crystallization activation energies of the blends with 20 or 40% PTT was ?48.3 and ?60.9 kJ/mol, respectively, as calculated by the Arrhenius formula for the isothermal‐crystallization processes. The Hoffman–Lauritzen theory was also employed to fit the process of isothermal crystallization, and the kinetic parameters of the blends with 20 or 40% PTT were determined to be 1.5 × 10⁵ and 1.8 × 10⁵ K², respectively. The spherulite morphology of the six binary blends formed at 190°C showed different sizes and perfect Maltese crosses when the PTT or PEN component was varied, suggesting that the greater the PTT content was, the larger or more perfect the crystallites were that formed in the binary blends. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3316–3325, 2007     

Crystallization behavior and crystal structure of poly(ethylene‐co‐trimethylene terephthalate)s

A series of random copolymers were synthesized by the bulk polycondensation of dimethyl terephthalate with ethylene glycol (EG) and propane‐1,3‐diol (PDO) in various compositions. Their composition and thermal properties were investigated. The copolymers with 57.7 mol % or more PDO or 14.4 mol % or less PDO were crystallizable, but those with 36–46.2 mol % PDO were amorphous. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior was investigated with varying cooling rates by DSC. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) homopolymers have relatively lower activation energy than their copolymers. PET‐rich copolymers (EG > 85.9%) exhibited PET crystal structure, and exhibited no PTT crystal structure; and PTT‐rich copolymers (PDO > 41.7%) exhibited PTT crystal structure, and exhibited no PET crystal structure. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Sequence analysis and fiber properties of a blend of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐bibenzoate)

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐4,4′‐ bibenzoate) (PETBB) are prepared by coextrusion. Analysis by ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy shows that little transesterification occurs during the blending process. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to more transesterification and a corresponding increase in the degree of randomness, R. Analysis by differential scanning calorimetry shows that the as‐extruded blend is semicrystalline, unlike PETBB15, a random copolymer with the same composition as the non‐ random blend. Additional heat treatment of the blend leads to a decrease in the melting point, T_m, and an increase in glass transition temperature, T_g. The T_m and T_g of the blend reach minimum and maximum values, respectively, after 15 min at 270°C, at which point the blend has not been fully randomized. The blend has a lower crystallization rate than PET and PETBB55 (a copolymer containing 55 mol % bibenzoate). The PET/PETBB55 (70/30 w/w) blend shows a secondary endothermic peak at 15°C above an isothermal crystallization temperature. The secondary peak was confirmed to be the melting of small and/or imperfect crystals resulting from secondary crystallization. The blend exhibits the crystal structure of PET. Tensile properties of the fibers prepared from the blend are comparable to those of PET fiber, whereas PETBB55 fibers display higher performance. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1793–1803, 2004     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Crystallization behavior of spray‐dried and freeze‐dried graphene oxide/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) composites

Two types of graphene oxide (GO) powders were prepared by freeze‐drying or spray‐drying method, and their composites with poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) were prepared by melt blending. The influence of GO powders' type and content on crystallization behavior of PTT was investigated by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). DSC results indicated that the overall crystallization rate of PTT was accelerated by well‐dispersed GO material which acts as a heterogeneous nucleation agent, since the Avrami parameter obtained is near 3. On the contrary, large GO aggregates which is in the minority will hinder the nucleation. Interestingly, large and well‐defined PTT spherulites instead of tremendous stunted spherulites were observed from POM, which means only a small portion of GO powders was acted as nucleation agent. Meanwhile, GO powders had no effect on PTT spherulites growth rate. In addition, the band spacing of PTT spherulites became weaker and wider with increasing GO content. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40332.     

Poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomers as nucleating agent on the crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA) ionomers were synthesized and designed as a new kind of nucleation agent according to the crystallization theory for improving the crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The crystallization behavior of PET with the addition of nucleation agents was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized‐light microscope, and X‐ray diffraction (XRD). Avrami equation and Hoffman–Lauritzen theory are adopted for analyzing isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics, respectively. The results show that the addition of 1 wt % SMA ionomers effectively accelerates the crystallization rate and reduces the fold surface free energy of PET at high temperature regions. PLM results also indicated that the crystals impinge on each other, thus decreasing the spherulite size for PET/SMA ionomers samples compared with PET. XRD measurement revealed that the introduction of SMA ionomers does not change the crystal structure but indeed accelerates the crystallinity of PET. The results clearly demonstrate that our synthesized SMA ionomers are an efficient nucleating agent for PET. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41240.     

Crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(ethylene suberate)

The crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(ethylene suberate) (PESub) were studied in detail with differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction. The Avrami equation could describe the overall isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of PESub at different crystallization temperatures; moreover, the overall crystallization rate of PESub decreased with increasing crystallization temperature. The equilibrium melting point of PESub was determined to be 70.8°C. Ring‐banded spherulites and a crystallization regime II to III transition were found for PESub. The Tobin equation could describe the nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of PESub at different cooling rates, while the Ozawa equation failed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43086.     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and their copolymers poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBET) containing 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40 molar ratios of 1,4‐butanediol/ethylene glycol were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at crystallization temperatures (T_c) which were 35–90 °C below equilibrium melting temperature . Although these copolymers contain both monomers in high proportion, DSC data revealed for copolymer crystallization behaviour. The reason for such copolymers being able to crystallize could be due to the similar chemical structures of 1,4‐butanediol and ethylene glycol. DSC results for isothermal crystallization revealed that random copolymers had a lower degree of crystallinity and lower crystallite growth rate than those of homopolymers. DSC heating scans, after completion of isothermal crystallization, showed triple melting endotherms for all these polyesters, similar to those of other polymers as reported in the literature. The crystallization isotherms followed the Avrami equation with an exponent n of 2–2.5 for PET and 2.5–3.0 for PBT and PBETs. Analyses of the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT and PET had higher growth rate constant G_o, and nucleation constant K_g than those of PBET copolymers. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization and melting behavior of poly(ε‐caprolactone‐co‐δ‐valerolactone) and poly(ε‐caprolactone‐co‐L‐lactide) copolymers with novel chain microstructures

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) characterization of the statistical copolymers of this study showed that the poly(ε‐caprolactone‐co‐L‐lactide)s, with ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL) molar contents ranging from 70 to 94% and ε‐CL average sequence length (l_CL) between 2.20–9.52, and the poly(ε‐caprolactone‐co‐δ‐valerolactone)s, with 60 to 85% of ε‐CL and l_CL between 2.65–6.08, present semi‐alternating (R→2) and random (R～1) distribution of sequences, respectively. These syntheses were carried out with the aim of reducing the crystallinity of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL), needed to provide mechanical strength to the material but also responsible for its slow degradation rate. However, this was not achieved in the case of the ε‐caprolactone‐co‐δ‐valerolactone (ε‐CL‐co‐δ‐VAL). Non‐isothermal cooling treatments at different rates and isothermal crystallizations (at 5, 10, 21 and 37°C) were conducted by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and demonstrated that ε‐CL copolymers containing δ‐valerolactone (δ‐VAL) exhibited a larger crystallization capability than those of L‐lactide (L‐LA) and also arranged into crystalline structures over shorter times. The crystallization enthalpies of the ε‐CL‐co‐δ‐VAL copolymers during the cooling treatments and their heat of fusion (ΔH_m) at the different isothermal temperatures were very large (i.e. ΔH_c > 53 Jg^?1) and in some cases, unrelated to the copolymer composition. In some compositions, such as the 60 : 40, Wide Angle X‐ray Scattering (WAXS) proved that that these two lactones undergo isomorphism and co‐crystallize in a single cell. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42534.     

Crystallization behavior and morphology of double crystalline poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate) copolymers

Double crystalline poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate) copolymers (PTT/PEOT), with PTT content ranging from 16.5 to 65.5 wt%, were synthesized by melt copolycondensation. The morphological transformation of samples from microphase separation to macrophase separation was investigated by gel permeation chromatography and transmission electron microscopy. Differential scanning calorimetry and in situ wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction suggested that all copolycondensation samples displayed double crystalline behavior. The melt‐crystallization peak temperatures (T_{m, c} values) of PTT chains monotonously increased with increasing PTT content and were higher than that of homo‐PTT when the content of PTT was above 30.6 wt%. Interestingly, T_{m, c} values of PEOT chains were also increased with increasing PTT content. Polarized optical microscopy revealed that all copolycondensation samples studied could form ring‐banded spherulites and band spacing increased with increasing T_c values. In addition, band spacing decreased with increasing PTT content at a given T_c. Strangely, although PEOT was the main component in all copolycondensation samples, spherulitic morphology formed by the advance crystallization of PTT did not change after PEOT crystallization. Only a subtle change of quadrant tones was detected. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization kinetics,melting behavior,and morphologies of poly(butylene succinate) and poly(butylene succinate)‐block‐poly(propylene glycol) segmented copolyester

This article investigated the crystallization kinetics, melting behavior, and morphologies of poly(butylene succinate)(PBS) and its segmented copolyester poly(butylene succinate)‐block‐poly(propylene glycol)(PBSP) by means of differential scanning calorimetry, polarized light microscopy, and wide angle X‐ray diffraction. Avrami equation was used to describe the isothermal crystallization kinetics. For nonisothermal crystallization studies, the Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny, and the model combining Avrami equation and Ozawa equation were employed. The results showed that the introduction of poly(propylene glycol) soft segment led to suppression of crystallization of PBS hard segment. The melting behavior of the isothermally and nonisothermally crystallized samples was also studied. Results showed that the isothermally crystallized samples exhibited two melting endotherms, whereas only one melting endotherm was shown after nonisothermal crystallization. The spherulitic morphology of PBSP and wide angle X‐ray diffraction showed that the polyether segments were excluded from the crystals and resided in between crystalline PBS lamellae and mixed with amorphous PBS. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Dynamic mechanical analysis of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)—A comparison with poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene naphthalate)

The fiber properties of PTT have been the subject of several reports, although very few reports describe the properties of molded specimens. In this work, the dynamic mechanical relaxation behavior of compression‐molded PTT films has been investigated. The added flexibility of the PTT was found to lower the temperature of the β‐ and α‐transitions relative to the PET and PEN. The results suggest that the β‐transition is at least two relaxations for PET and PTT due to the increase in the breadth of the relaxation. The results seem to support the hypothesized mechanism of others, in that the β‐transition involves the relaxation of the carbonyl entity and the aromatic C1–C4 ring flips for PTT and PET, and the relaxation of the carbonyl for PEN. The β*‐ and α‐transitions for all three polymers seem to be cooperative in nature. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2791–2796, 2004     

Crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐neopentyl terephthalate‐co‐ethylene isophthalate‐co‐neopentyl isophthalate) copolyester and its application in laminated tin‐free steel

A low crystallinity, the copolyester poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐neopentyl terephthalate‐co‐ethylene isophthalate‐co‐neopentyl isophthalate) (PENIT) was synthesized and applied for laminated tin‐free steel. The structures and thermal properties of the copolyester were characterized by ¹H‐NMR, thermogravimetry analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, and polarized optical microscopy. Differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, and polarized optical microscopy results show that the crystallization ability of the copolyester decreased obviously. Meanwhile, the peel strength, crystallinity, and water‐vapor permeability of the copolyester film were also measured at varied lamination temperatures. The result confirm that an improvement in the lamination temperature led to an increased ratio of amorphous PENIT to crystalline PENIT and decreased structural orientation, and the decrease in the structural orientation sped up the increase in the rate of water‐vapor permeability. On the basis of the purpose of reducing a detrimental effect on the corrosion resistance caused by water permeation, a reasonable lamination temperature was selected. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42308.     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(ethylene isophthalate‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) copolyesters

Poly(ethylene isophthalate‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PEIPET) copolymers of various compositions and molecular weights were synthesized by melt polycondensation and characterized in terms of chemical structure and thermal and rheological properties. At room temperature, all copolymers were amorphous and thermally stable up to about 400°C. The main effect of copolymerization was a monotonic increase of glass transition temperature (T_g) as the content of ethylene terephthalate units increased. The Fox equation accurately describes the T_g–composition data. The presence of ethylene terephthalate units was found to influence rheological behavior in the melt, with the Newtonian viscosity increasing as the content of ethylene terephthalate units increased. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 186–193, 2004