Self‐Assembly of a Donor‐Acceptor Dyad Across Multiple Length Scales: Functional Architectures for Organic Electronics

Molecular dyads based on polycyclic electron donor (D) and electron acceptor (A) units represent suitable building blocks for forming highly ordered, solution‐processable, nanosegregated D‐A domains for potential use in (opto)electronic applications. A new dyad, based on alkyl substituted hexa‐peri‐hexabenzocoronene (HBC) and perylene monoimide (PMI) separated by an ethinylene linker, is shown to have a high tendency to self‐assemble into ordered supramolecular arrangements at multiple length scales: macroscopic extruded filaments display long‐range crystalline order, nanofiber networks are produced by simple spin‐coating, and monolayers with a lamellar packing are formed by physisorption at the solution‐HOPG interface. Moreover, highly uniform mesoscopic ribbons bearing atomically flat facets and steps with single‐molecule heights self‐assemble upon solvent‐vapor annealing. Electrical measurements of HBC‐PMI films and mesoscopic ribbons in a transistor configuration exhibit ambipolar transport with well balanced p‐ and n‐type mobilities. Owing to the increased level of order at the supramolecular level, devices based on ribbons show mobility increases of more than one order of magnitude.     

Customized Electronic Coupling in Self‐Assembled Donor–Acceptor Nanostructures

Charge transfer processes between donor–acceptor complexes and metallic electrodes are at the heart of novel organic optoelectronic devices such as solar cells. Here, a combined approach of surface‐sensitive microscopy, synchrotron radiation spectroscopy, and state‐of‐the‐art ab initio calculations is used to demonstrate the delicate balance that exists between intermolecular and molecule–substrate interactions, hybridization, and charge transfer in model donor–acceptor assemblies at metal‐organic interfaces. It is shown that charge transfer and chemical properties of interfaces based on single component layers cannot be naively extrapolated to binary donor–acceptor assemblies. In particular, studying the self‐assembly of supramolecular nanostructures on Cu(111), composed of fluorinated copper‐phthalocyanines (F₁₆CuPc) and diindenoperylene (DIP), it is found that, in reference to the associated single component layers, the donor (DIP) decouples electronically from the metal surface, while the acceptor (F₁₆CuPc) suffers strong hybridization with the substrate.