Electropharmacologic effects of class I and class III antiarrhythmia drugs on typical atrial flutter: insights into the mechanism of termination

BACKGROUND: Acute effects of class I and class III antiarrhythmia drugs on the reentrant circuit of typical atrial flutter are not fully studied. Furthermore, the critical electrophysiologic determinants of flutter termination by antiarrhythmia drugs are not clear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 36 patients (mean age, 53+/-17 years) with clinically documented typical atrial flutter. A 20-pole "halo" catheter was positioned around the tricuspid annulus. Incremental pacing was performed to measure the conduction velocity along the isthmus and lateral wall, and extrastimulation was performed to evaluate atrial refractory period in the baseline state and after intravenous infusion of ibutilide, propafenone, and amiodarone. Efficacy of these drugs in conversion of typical atrial flutter and patterns of termination were also determined. Ibutilide significantly increased the atrial refractory period and decreased conduction velocity in the isthmus at short pacing cycle length. It terminated atrial flutter in 8 (67%) of 12 patients after prolongation of flutter cycle length due to increase (86+/-19%) of conduction time in the isthmus. Propafenone predominantly decreased conduction velocity with use dependency and significantly increased atrial refractory period, but it only converted atrial flutter in 4 (33%) of 12 patients. Amiodarone had fewer effects on atrial refractory period and conduction velocity than did ibutilide and propafenone, and it terminated atrial flutter in only 4 (33%) of 12 patients. Termination of typical atrial flutter was due to failure of wave front propagation through the isthmus, which occurred with cycle length oscillation, abruptly without variability of cycle length, or after premature activation of the reentrant circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Ibutilide, with a unique increase in atrial refractoriness, was more effective in conversion of atrial flutter than were propafenone and amiodarone.     

Conduction properties of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annular isthmus in patients with typical atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: A functional region of slow conduction located in the inferior right atrium has been postulated to be critical to the induction and maintenance of typical human atrial flutter. We reexamined the potential role of functional conduction delay in the annular isthmus between the tricuspid valve and the inferior vena cava; it is within this region that such delays have been postulated to occur, and where interruption of conduction by radiofrequency energy application has been shown to eliminate typical flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with type I atrial flutter (30 counterclockwise, 14 clockwise) were studied. Counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus activation times adjacent and parallel to the tricuspid valve were measured during three conditions: (1) atrial pacing in sinus rhythm, (2) atrial flutter, and (3) entrainment of atrial flutter. During pacing in sinus rhythm at progressively shorter cycle lengths, both counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus activation times remained unchanged; decremental conduction prior to flutter induction or loss of capture was not observed. Counterclockwise isthmus activation time did not significantly differ during flutter (68 +/- 23 msec), inferolateral tricuspid annulus pacing (71 +/- 23 msec), or entrainment of flutter (72 +/- 23 msec). Similarly, clockwise isthmus activation times did not significantly differ between flutter (65 +/- 22 msec), proximal coronary sinus pacing (73 +/- 21 msec), or entrainment of flutter (64 +/- 15 msec). CONCLUSION: Decremental conduction is not characteristic of activation through the isthmus when activation is assessed parallel and adjacent to the tricuspid annulus. Functional slowing or conduction delay does not develop in this region during typical atrial flutter.     

Conduction properties of the crista terminalis in patients with typical atrial flutter: basis for a line of block in the reentrant circuit

INTRODUCTION: Previous mapping studies in patients with typical atrial flutter have demonstrated the crista terminalis to be a posterior barrier of the reentrant circuit forming a line of block. However, the functional role of the crista terminalis in patients with or without a history of atrial flutter is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine whether the conduction properties of the crista terminalis are different between patients with and those without a history of atrial flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 12 patients with clinically documented atrial flutter (group 1) and 12 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia as well as induced atrial flutter (group 2). A 7-French, 20-pole, deflectable Halo catheter was positioned around the tricuspid annulus. A 7-French, 20-pole Crista catheter was placed along the crista terminalis identified by the recording of double potentials with opposite activation sequences during typical atrial flutter. After sinus rhythm was restored, pacing from the low posterior right atrium near the crista terminalis was performed at multiple cycle length to 2:1 atrial capture. No double potentials were recorded along the crista terminalis during sinus rhythm in both groups. In group 1, the longest pacing cycle length that resulted in a line of block with double potentials along the crista terminalis was 638 +/- 119 msec. After infusion of propranolol, it was prolonged to 832 +/- 93 msec without change of the interdeflection intervals of double potentials. In group 2, the longest pacing cycle length that resulted in a line of block with double potentials along the crista terminalis was 214 +/- 23 msec. After infusion of procainamide, it was prolonged to 306 +/- 36 msec with increase of interdeflection interval of double potentials. CONCLUSION: The crista terminalis forms a line of transverse conduction block during typical atrial flutter. Poor transverse conduction property in the crista terminalis may be the requisite substrate for clinical occurrence of typical atrial flutter.     

Detection of BK polyomavirus genotypes in healthy and HIV-positive children

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia which frequently recurs after cardioversion and is relatively difficult to control with antiarrhythmic agents. AIMS: To evaluate the success rate, recurrence rate and safety of radiofrequency, (RF) ablation for atrial flutter in a consecutive series of patients with drug refractory chronic or paroxysmal forms of the arrhythmia. METHODS: Electrophysiologic evaluation of atrial flutter included activation mapping with a 20 electrode halo catheter placed around the tricuspid annulus and entrainment mapping from within the low right atrial isthmus. After confirmation of the arrhythmia mechanism with these techniques, an anatomic approach was used to create a linear lesion between the inferior tricuspid annulus and the eustachian ridge at the anterior margin of the inferior vena cava. In order to demonstrate successful ablation, mapping techniques were employed to show that bi-directional conduction block was present in the low right atrial isthmus. RESULTS: Successful ablation was achieved in 26/27 patients (96%). In one patient with a grossly enlarged right atrium, isthmus block could not be achieved. Of the 26 patients with successful ablation, there has been one recurrence of typical flutter (4%) during a mean follow-up period of 5.5 +/- 2.7 months. This patient underwent a successful repeat ablation procedure. Of eight patients with documented clinical atrial fibrillation (in addition to atrial flutter) prior to the procedure, five continued to have atrial fibrillation following the ablation. There were no procedural complications and all patients had normal AV conduction at the completion of the ablation. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation is a highly effective and safe procedure for cure of atrial flutter. In patients with chronic or recurrent forms of atrial flutter RF ablation should be considered as a first line therapeutic option.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation in type I atrial flutter: preliminary experience of 10 cases

Common atrial flutter results from macroreentry in the right atrium. Catheter ablation of slow conduction, between tricuspid annulus and inferior vena cava (TA-IVC) or tricuspid annulus and coronary sinus ostium (TA-CS os) has been reported to terminate and prevent recurrence of this arrhythmia. We reported 10 consecutive patients, 7 men and 3 women, who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter. The mean age was 59.4 +/- 11.2 years (range 42-82 years). During the paroxysmal atrial flutter, all patients had palpitation, 4 had dyspnea on exertion, 3 patients had syncope and 1 patient had presyncope. The mean duration of symptoms was 5.7 +/- 4.9 years (range 0.5-13 years). Two patients had dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 Ebstein's anomaly and 1 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Four patients (40%) had history of atrial fibrillation (AF) before ablation. The mean cycle length of atrial rhythm was 257.2 +/- 36.6 ms. Ablation was done by anatomical approach and could terminate arrhythmia in 9 patients (90%), 7 from TA-IVC, 2 from TA-CS os without major complication. The mean number of applications was 20.4 +/- 16.9 and turned atrial flutter to normal sinus rhythm in 13.5 +/- 10.7 seconds. Fluoroscopic and procedure times were 38.4 +/- 31.4 and 157.2 +/- 68.8 minutes, respectively. During the follow-up period of 24.0 +/- 28.7 weeks, 2 patients had recurrent atrial arrhythmia, 1 atrial fibrillation and 1 atrial flutter type I, giving the final success rate of 70 per cent. All patients who had recurrence or failure had a history of paroxysmal AF before ablation. In conclusion, radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial flutter type I, using anatomical approach, is an effective treatment to terminate and prevent this arrhythmia in short term follow-up. It may be considered as an alternative treatment in patients with atrial flutter who were refractory to antiarrhythmic agents.     

Role of the tricuspid annulus and the eustachian valve/ridge on atrial flutter. Relevance to catheter ablation of the septal isthmus and a new technique for rapid identification of ablation success

BACKGROUND: Typical atrial flutter (AFL) results from right atrial reentry by propagation through an isthmus between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and tricuspid annulus (TA). We postulated that the eustachian valve and ridge (EVR) forms a line of conduction block between the IVC and coronary sinus (CS) ostium and forms a second isthmus (septal isthmus) between the TA and CS ostium. METHODS AND RESULTS: Endocardial mapping in 30 patients with AFL demonstrated atrial activation around the TA in the counter-clockwise direction (left anterior oblique projection). Double atrial potentials were recorded along the EVR in all patients during AFL. Pacing either side of the EVR during sinus rhythm also produced double potentials, which indicated fixed anatomic block across EVR. Entrainment pacing at the septal isthmus and multiple sites around the TA produced a delta return interval < or = 8 ms in 14 of 15 patients tested. Catheter ablation eliminated AFL in all patients by ablation of the septal isthmus in 26 patients and the posterior isthmus in 4. AFL recurred in 2 of 12 patients (mean follow-up, 33.9 +/- 16.3 months) in whom ablation success was defined by the inability to reinduce AFL, compared with none of 18 patients (mean follow-up, 10.3 +/- 8.3 months) in whom success required formation of a complete line of conduction block between the TA and the EVR, identified by CS pacing that produced atrial activation around the TA only in the counterclockwise direction and by pacing the posterior TA with only clockwise atrial activation. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The EVR forms a line of fixed conduction block between the IVC and the CS; (2) the EVR and the TA provide boundaries for the AFL reentrant circuit; and (3) verification of a complete line of block between the TA and the EVR is a more reliable criterion for long-term ablation success.     

An Italian experience of radiofrequency transcatheter ablation in type-I atrial flutter: the results and follow-up

BACKGROUND: Type I atrial flutter (AF) is a supraventricular tachycardia that is notoriously disabling and resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs. The introduction of an effective non-pharmacologic technique, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF), opened new therapeutic prospects for the management of this arrhythmia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of atrial flutter RF using a successful procedure marker of bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus. METHODS: In the last consecutive 50 patients (pts) who underwent RF procedure for AF at our Center (46 pts during spontaneous or induced AF and 4 in sinus rhythm) after the successful interruption of AF we performed the usual reinduction attempts and well atrial pacing from 2 sites in the right atrium (in 18 pts before and after RF and in 32 only after RF). The sites of pacing were site 1: low lateral right atrium (LRA); site 2: proximal coronary sinus (PCS). The 50 pts consisted of 13 females, 37 males with a mean age of 62.5 +/- 9.7 years (35-83). The end-point for the procedure was: 1) abrupt interruption of AF; 2) inability to reinduce AF; 3) recognition of atrial activation sequence during pacing in LRA and in PCS compatible with conduction block in the isthmus. RESULTS: The RF was successful in terminating AF in all pts after 11 +/- 7 applications of energy. After ablation, sustained AF was no longer inducible by atrial pacing. After RF, during pacing in sinus rhythm from LRA, the lower septum and PCS presented a delayed activation after the His region. Similarly, during pacing from PCS after ablation, the atrial activation sequence was modified: the low lateral right atrium was now activated by a single front after the high lateral atrium. No acute complications were noted in any pts during or after procedure. AF recurred in 9 pts. Four pts now present chronic atrial fibrillation. The mean follow-up period is 14.8 +/- 8 months. All the patients were discharged without antiarrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of successful ablation is the bi-directional conduction block in the isthmus with the evidence of the changes in the right atrial activation sequence during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm in LRA and in PCS before and after RF.     

Clinical study on 6 cases of urosepsis associated with septic shock

A linear lesion created at the right atrial isthmus by radiofrequency current application can successfully eliminate common atrial flutter (AF). The mechanism of unsuccessful cases has not yet been well delineated. This study sought to investigate the cause of unsuccessful cases of radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Sixty-six patients with refractory common AF were referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Radiofrequency current was applied to the right atrial isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid annulus or between the coronary sinus orifice and tricuspid annulus. In 5 (8%) of the 66 patients, a morphological change of the flutter wave was observed in the 12-lead ECG concomitant with the change of the atrial excitation sequence during the delivery of radiofrequency energy without the termination of atrial flutter. In 8 (12%) patients, the morphology of the new AF wave, which was provoked electrically after the termination of the original AF, was different, and the average flutter cycle length also differed in 3 cases (2%). The results of radiofrequency application could be misinterpreted as unsuccessful when the occurrence of another, different type of AF has been overlooked following the elimination of the original AF during the radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure. It is possible that the flutter circuit can take an alternative pathway despite the complete conduction block at the right atrial isthmus.     

Tachycardia-induced change of atrial refractory period in humans: rate dependency and effects of antiarrhythmic drugs

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to shorten the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) and make the atrium more vulnerable to AF. This study investigated the effect of atrial rate and antiarrhythmic drugs on ERP shortening induced by tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy adult patients without structural heart disease were included. For the first part of the study, right atrial ERP was measured with a drive cycle length of 500 ms before and after 10 minutes of rapid atrial pacing using five pacing cycle lengths (450, 400, 350, 300, and 250 ms) in 10 patients. For the second part of the study, the remaining 60 patients were included to study the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on changes in atrial ERP induced by AF. Atrial ERP was measured with a drive cycle of 500 ms before and after an episode of pacing-induced AF. After the patients were randomized to receive one of six antiarrhythmic drugs (procainamide, propafenone, propranolol, dl-sotalol, amiodarone, and verapamil), atrial ERP was measured before and after another episode of pacing-induced AF. In the first part of the study, atrial ERP shortened significantly after 10 minutes of rapid atrial pacing, and the degree of shortening was correlated with pacing cycle length. The second part of the study showed that atrial ERP shortened after conversion of AF (172+/-15 versus 202+/-14 ms, P<0.0001) and that ERP shortening was attenuated after verapamil infusion (-4.6+/-1.2% versus -15.1+/-3.4%, P<0.001) but was unchanged after infusion of the other antiarrhythmic drugs. Furthermore, all of these antiarrhythmic drugs could decrease the incidence and duration of secondary AF. CONCLUSIONS: The atrial ERP shortening induced by tachycardia was a rate-dependent response. Verapamil, but not other antiarrhythmic drugs, could markedly attenuate this effect. However, verapamil and the other drugs could decrease the incidence and duration of secondary AF.     

Characterization of the excitable gap in human type I atrial flutter

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the excitable gap of the reentrant circuit in atrial flutter. BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic substrate of typical atrial flutter has not been well characterized. Specifically, it is not known whether the properties of the tricuspid valve isthmus differ from those of the remainder of the circuit. METHODS: Resetting was performed from two sites within the circuit: proximal (site A) and distal (site B) to the isthmus in 14 patients with type I atrial flutter. Resetting response patterns and the location where interval-dependent conduction slowing occurred were assessed. RESULTS: Some duration of a flat resetting response (mean +/- SD 40.1 +/- 20.9 ms, 16 +/- 8% of the cycle length) was observed in 13 of 14 patients; 1 patient had a purely increasing response. During the increasing portion of the resetting curve, interval-dependent conduction delay most commonly occurred in the isthmus. In most cases, the resetting response was similar at both sites. In three patients, the resetting response differed significantly between the two sites; this finding suggests that paced beats may transiently change conduction within the circuit or the circuit path, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Some duration of a flat resetting response was observed in most cases of type I atrial flutter, signifying a fully excitable gap in all portions of the circuit. The isthmus represents the portion of the circuit most vulnerable to interval-dependent conduction delay at short coupling intervals.     

Right-sided maze procedure for right atrial arrhythmias in congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and flutter, commonly associated with congenital heart anomalies that cause right atrial dilatation, may cause significant morbidity and reduction of quality of life, even after surgical repair of the anomalies. METHODS: In an effort to reduce the incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after repair of right-sided congenital heart disease, we performed a concomitant right-sided maze procedure. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter (n = 12) or chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter (n = 6) aged 10.9 to 68.4 years (mean 34.9 years) underwent a right-sided maze in association with repair of Ebstein's anomaly (n = 15), congenital tricuspid insufficiency (n = 2), and isolated atrial septal defect (n = 1). There were no early deaths, reoperations, or complete heart block. Discharge rhythm was sinus (n = 16) or junctional (n = 2). Follow-up was complete in all 18 patients and ranged from 3.1 to 17.2 months (mean 8.1 months); all are in New York Heart Association class I. Early postoperative arrhythmias developed in 3 patients (all were converted to sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drugs). There were no late deaths or reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of a right-sided maze procedure with cardiac repair in patients having congenital heart anomalies that cause right atrial dilatation and associated atrial tachyarrhythmias is effective in eliminating or reducing the incidence of those arrhythmias.     

Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiological mechanisms for successful catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFI) targeting the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus (IVC-TA) isthmus have not been determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with common AFI were studied. All had inducible common AFI, and 8 of them had both common and reverse AFI. Right atrial (RA) activation sequences were investigated during pacing from sites proximal (low lateral RA) and distal (proximal coronary sinus) to the IVC-TA isthmus both during entrainment of common or reverse AFI and during pacing in sinus rhythm. This was repeated after ablation. During pacing in sinus rhythm from the low lateral RA, the septum was activated by caudocranial and craniocaudal wave fronts. Similarly, during pacing from the proximal coronary sinus, the lateral RA was activated by two wave fronts. Catheter ablation of the IVC-TA isthmus induced dramatic changes in mapping due to the loss of caudocranial wave front in all but 1 patient. The septum and the lateral RA were activated by a single craniocaudal front as during entrainment of reverse or common AFI, respectively. After a follow-up of 8 +/- 2 months, common or reverse AFI occurred in 4 patients. Two had no or only unidirectional changes in the isthmus conduction induced by ablation. The other 2 had a late recovery of conduction. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence that the mechanism of successful AFI ablation targeting the IVC-TA isthmus is local bidirectional conduction block. This change can be used as a new and complementary electrophysiological end point for the procedure. AFI recurrences are associated with failure to achieve a permanent block.     

Conversion efficacy and safety of intravenous ibutilide compared with intravenous procainamide in patients with atrial flutter or fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of ibutilide versus procainamide for conversion of recent-onset atrial flutter or fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Ibutilide fumarate is an intravenous (IV) class III antiarrhythmic agent that has been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo in the pharmacologic conversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Procainamide is commonly used for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (age range 22 to 92 years) with atrial flutter or fibrillation of 3 h to 90 days' (mean 21 days) duration were randomized to receive either two 10-min IV infusions of 1 mg of ibutilide fumarate, separated by a 10-min infusion of 5% dextrose in sterile water, or three successive 10-min IV infusions of 400 mg of procainamide hydrochloride. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients, 120 were evaluated for efficacy: 35 (58.3%) of 60 in the ibutilide group compared with 11 (18.3%) of 60 in the procainamide group had successful termination within 1.5 h of treatment (p < 0.0001). Seven patients were found to have violated the protocol and were not included in the final evaluation. In the patients with atrial flutter, ibutilide had a significantly higher success rate than procainamide (76% [13 of 17] vs. 14% [3 of 22], p=0.001). Similarly, in the atrial fibrillation group, ibutilide had a significantly higher success rate than procainamide (51% [22 of 43] vs. 21% [8 of 38], p=0.005). One patient who received ibutilide, which was found to be a protocol violation, had sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring direct current cardioversion. Seven patients who received procainamide became hypotensive. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the superior efficacy of ibutilide over procainamide when administered to patients to convert either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter to sinus rhythm. Hypotension was the major adverse effect seen with procainamide. A low incidence of serious proarrhythmia was seen with the administration of ibutilide occurring at the end of infusion.     

Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing

OBJECTIVES: We investigated 1) the feasibility, safety and efficacy of multisite right atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF); and 2) the ability of atrial pacing in single- and dual-site modes to increase arrhythmia-free intervals in patients with drug-refractory AF. BACKGROUND: We recently developed and applied a novel technique of dual-site right atrial pacing in an unselected group of consecutive patients with AF requiring demand pacing. A prospective crossover study design was used to evaluate single- and dual-site right atrial pacing modes. METHODS: The frequency of AF during the 3 months before pacemaker implantation was analyzed. Consecutive consenting patients underwent insertion of two atrial leads and one ventricular lead with a DDDR pulse generator. Patients were placed in a dual-site pacing mode for the first 3 months and subsequently mode switched to single site pacing for 3 months. Mode switching was repeated at 6-month intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Atrial pacing resulted in a marked decline in AF recurrences (p < 0.001). During dual-site pacing with an optimal drug regimen, there was no AF recurrence in any patient compared with five recurrences in 12 patients during single-site pacing (p = 0.03). The mean (+/-SD) arrhythmia-free interval before pacing (14 +/- 14 days) was prolonged with dual- (89 +/- 7 days, p < 0.0001) and single-site pacing (76 +/- 27 days, p < 0.0001). Symptomatic AF episodes showed a declining trend during dual- and single-site pacing compared with those during the preimplantation period (p = 0.10). Mean antiarrhythmic drug use for all classes declined from 4 +/- 1.9 drugs before implantation to 1.5 +/- 0.5 (p < 0.01) drugs after implantation. Twelve (80%) of 15 patients remained in atrial paced rhythm at 13 +/- 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that multisite right atrial pacing is feasible, effective and safe for long-term application. Atrial pacing significantly prolongs arrhythmia-free intervals in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Dual-site right atrial pacing may offer additional benefits and should be considered either as the primary mode or in patients unresponsive to single-site pacing.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with common atrial flutter

BACKGROUND: Type 1 atrial flutter is produced by a reentry circuit located in the right atrium that can be interrupted applying radiofrequency in the inferior cava-tricuspid valve isthmus. AIM: To report our experience in the treatment of atrial flutter with radiofrequency ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (eight male) whose ages ranged from 6 to 72 years old were studied. Two patients had an operated congenital cardiopathy, two had high blood pressure, one was subjected previously to radiofrequency ablation due to a left paraspecific pathway, one developed a cardiac failure secondary to tachycardia and three did not have evidences of cardiopathy. RESULTS: In two patients, atrial flutter was not interrupted. In the other seven patients, radiofrequency ablation was successful. There were three relapses in the first month after the procedure, of these, two patients were successfully treated again. After a mean follow up of 4.5 months, these patients are asymptomatic and without antiarrhythmic drugs. Analysis of obtained signals, showed that radiofrequency that interrupted atrial flutter always occurred in zones of double potentials. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for atrial flutter and the zone of successful ablation is associated to the presence of double atrial potentials.     

Coronary sinus pacing initiates counterclockwise atrial flutter while pacing from the low lateral right atrium initiates clockwise atrial flutter. Analysis of episodes of direct initiation of atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: Rapid atrial pacing in sinus rhythm may directly induce atrial flutter without provoking intervening atrial fibrillation, or initiate atrial flutter indirectly, by a conversion from an episode of transient atrial fibrillation provoked by rapid atrial pacing. The present study was performed to examine whether or not the direct induction of clockwise or counterclockwise atrial flutter was pacing-site (right or left atrium) dependent. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the mode of direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing. In 46 patients with a history of atrial flutter, rapid atrial pacing with 3 to 20 stimuli (cycle length = 500 - 170 ms) was performed in sinus rhythm to induce atrial flutter from 3 atrial sites, including the high right atrium, the low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus, while recording multiple intracardiac electrograms of the atria. Direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing was a rare phenomenon and was documented only 22 times in 15 patients: 3, 11, and 8 times during stimulation, respectively, from the high right atrium, low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus. Counterclockwise atrial flutter (12 times) was more frequently induced with stimulation from the proximal coronary sinus than from the low lateral right atrium (8 vs 1, P = .0001); clockwise atrial flutter (10 times) was induced exclusively from the low lateral right atrium (P = .0001 for low lateral right atrium vs proximal coronary sinus, P = .011 for low lateral right atrium vs high right atrium). CONCLUSIONS: Direct induction of either counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter was definitively pacing-site dependent; low lateral right atrial pacing induced clockwise, while proximal coronary sinus pacing induced counterclockwise atrial flutter. Anatomic correlation between the flutter circuit and the atrial pacing site may play an important role in the inducibility of counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter.     

Alveolar ridge reconstruction and/or preservation using root form bioglass cones

OBJECTIVE: Since the 1990's radiofrequency ablation radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter has evolved in its methods and results. We have reviewed the long term outcome in 62 patients with typical (common) or reversed (clockwise) flutter undergoing radiofrequency ablation between 1990 and 1997. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty men and 12 women, aged 22-78 years (57 +/- 12) with flutter recurring after cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs make this series. Flutter was typical in 59 cases and reversed in 3. There was no heart disease in 14, bronchopulmonary disease in 10, coronary disease in 9, cardiomyopathies in 6 and other processes in the remainder. In 5 cases with previous surgery for atrial or ventricular septal defect, Ebstein's anomaly or myxoma, we treated also a macro-reentry tachycardia around the atriotomy in the right atrium. Radiofrequency ablation was directed to the inferior vena cava-tricuspid isthmus in typical and reversed flutter, and to the isthmus between the inferior end of the atriotomy and the inferior vena cava, in the lateral right atrium, in the atriotomy tachycardias. We subdivided our patients in Group 1 (24 patients), treated until the end of 1994, and Group 2 (38 patients) treated since 1995 using specially designed catheters and trying to produce isthmus block as the endpoint of the procedure. RESULTS: Radiofrequency ablation interrupted flutter in 61 of 62 cases (98.4%), and the atriotomy tachycardia in all 5. The number of application in Group 1 was 18.6 +/- 10.1 vs 12 +/- 10 in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Follow-up was 40 +/- 24 months in Group 1 vs 16 +/- 9.5 in Group 2. Flutter recurred in 58% of Group 1 and 13% of Group 2 patients (p < 0.001), usually 1-3 months after radiofrequency ablation and they were successfully treated by new radiofrequency ablation with a small number of applications. There was no recurrence of atriotomy tachycardia. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 14 patients (23%) (11 paroxysmal, 3 persistent), with equal incidence in both groups. At the end of follow-up 85% of the patients were in sinus rhythm, although 6 needed pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction (3) or AV ablation (3). Antiarrhythmic drugs were used by 46% of patients in Group 1 and 26% in Group 2 (p = NS) for atrial arrhythmias or recurrent flutter. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for flutter and macro-reentry atriotomy tachycardia. Progress in methods have improved results significantly. Atrial fibrillation can still be a problem in 20-25% of the patients after flutter control.     

Mechanism and location of atrial flutter in transplanted hearts: observations during transient entrainment from distant sites

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to elucidate the location and mechanism of typical atrial flutter in the transplanted heart. BACKGROUND: Although the F wave morphology in atrial flutter is similar in nontransplanted and transplanted hearts, the surgical incision needed for the atrial anastomosis may create a distinct electrophysiologic substrate of atrial flutter. METHODS: Entrainment from the lateral wall of the right atrium and interatrial septum was used to determine the location of atrial flutter in five patients with a transplanted heart and six patients with a nontransplanted heart. The difference between the first postpacing interval (FPPI) and the flutter cycle length (FCL) was used as an index of proximity to the circuit. RESULTS: In the transplant group, the FPPI was equal to the FCL at sites located close to the tricuspid annulus (TA); the mean differences (+/-SD) were 1 +/- 5 and -1 +/- 2 ms at the lateral wall and interatrial septum, respectively. However, from sites close to the surgical incision at the lateral wall and at the interatrial septum, these differences were significantly longer (29 +/- 12 and 27 +/- 9 ms, respectively, p < 0.05). In the nontransplant group, the FPPI was similar to the FCL at points in the lateral wall and interatrial septum close to the TA (mean difference 7 +/- 6 and 6 +/- 11 ms, respectively) and at sites close to the crista terminalis (CT) in the lateral wall (mean difference 4 +/- 4 ms). However, in sites separated from the TA at the interatrial septum the difference was markedly longer (35 +/- 11 ms, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter in transplanted hearts may best be explained by macroreentry around the tricuspid ring. In non-transplanted hearts a different structure (perhaps the CT?) may be the basis for atrial flutter at the lateral wall.     

Direct conversion of atrial flutter to sinus rhythm with low-output, short-duration transesophageal atrial pacing

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) is useful for terminating paroxysmal non-self terminating atrial flutter (PAF); however, high output pacing of long stimulus duration causes severe symptoms such as chest pain. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of low-output, short-duration TAP on the conversion of PAF. METHODS: We applied low-output (within 15 mA with a pulse duration of 10 ms), short-duration (within 4 s) TAP in 31 patients (50 +/- 19 years) with PAF. Transesophageal pacing was delivered with 10 pulses of burst pacing at intervals that were 20 ms shorter than those of the flutter wave length. When the conversion was unsuccessful, we delivered 20 pulses of burst pacing. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (52%) were converted directly to sinus rhythm and 12 (38%) to atrial fibrillation. Transesophageal pacing was ineffective in 3 (10%) patients. The duration of atrial flutter, maximum flutter wave amplitude, effective pacing intervals, underlying heart diseases, and cardiac function were not different between patients who had direct conversion to sinus rhythm and those converted to atrial fibrillation. The patients who had direct conversion to sinus rhythm had longer flutter wave cycle lengths than those converted to atrial fibrillation (248 vs. 221 ms, p < 0.005). No patient had complications and complained of any symptoms. CONCLUSION: Low-output, short-duration TAP was useful to convert PAF directly to sinus rhythm without side effects.     

Atrial macroreentry involving the myocardium of the coronary sinus: a unique mechanism for atypical flutter

Atrial flutter involving either clockwise or counterclockwise rotation around the tricuspid annulus utilizing the subeustachian isthmus has been well described. However, macroreentrant atrial circuits in atypical atrial flutter in patients who have not undergone previous surgery or without atrial disease are not well defined. We describe a patient without structural heart disease who presented with an atrial macroreentrant rhythm. Entrainment mapping demonstrated a critical isthmus within the coronary sinus. Activation mapping demonstrated double potential throughout the length of the coronary sinus with disparate activation sequences. A circuit involving the myocardium of the coronary sinus, exiting in the lateral left atrium, down the interatrial septum, and reentering into the coronary sinus was identified. Successful ablation of the rhythm was accomplished by a circumferential radiofrequency application within the coronary sinus.