Mechanical properties and morphology of polylactide,linear low‐density polyethylene,and their blends

Melt blending of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and polylactide (PLA) was performed in an extrusion mixer with post extrusion blown film attachment with and without compatibilizer‐grafted low density polyethylene maleic anhydride. The blend compositions were optimized for tensile properties as per ASTM D 882‐91. On the basis of this, LLDPE 80 [80 wt % LLDPE and 20 wt % poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA)] and MA‐g‐low‐density polyethylene 80/4 (80 wt % LLDPE, 20 wt % PLLA, and 4 phr compatibilizer) were found to be an optimum composition. The blends were characterized according to their mechanical, thermal, and morphological behavior. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the presence of compatibilizer enhanced the blend compatibility to some extent. The morphological characteristics of the blends with and without compatibilizer were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The dispersion of PLLA in the LLDPE matrix increased with the addition of compatibilizer. This blend may be used for packaging applications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)–LLDPE blends

In this work, blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared. LLDPE was used as an impact modifier. Since the system was found to be incompatible, compatibilization was sought for by the addition of the following two types of functionalized polyethylene: ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) and maleic anhydride‐grafted EVA copolymer (EVA‐g‐MAH). The effects of the compatibilizers on the rheological and mechanical properties of the blends have been also quantitatively investigated. The impact strength of the PBT–LLDPE binary blends slightly increased at a lower concentration of LLDPE but increased remarkably above a concentration of 60 wt % of LLDPE. The morphology of the blends showed that the LLDPE particles had dispersed in the PBT matrix below 40 wt % of LLDPE, while, at 60 wt % of LLDPE, a co‐continuous morphology was obtained, which could explain the increase of the impact strength of the blend. Generally, the mechanical strength was decreased by adding LLDPE to PBT. Addition of EVA or EVA‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizer to PBT–LLDPE (70/30) blend considerably improved the impact strength of the blend without significantly sacrificing the tensile and the flexural strength. More improvement in those mechanical properties was observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH system than for the EVA system. A larger viscosity increase was also observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH than EVA. This may be due to interaction of the EVA‐g‐MAH with PBT. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 989–997, 1999     

Linear low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends compatibilization prepared by an eccentric rotor extruder: A morphology,mechanical, thermal,and rheological study

In this study, various poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) with maleic anhydride‐grafted LLDPE (LLDPE‐g‐MAH) compatibilizer were melt blended under an elongational flow. A novel extrusion device, eccentric rotor extruder (ERE), was developed to supply such flow during the process. Including morphology, mechanical properties, melting behavior, and rheological behavior were studied. The morphological study showed that the compatibility between LLDPE and PET was greatly improved with LLDPE loading up to 80 wt %. Mechanical tests indicated that LLDPE could toughen PET to some extent. Moreover, a comparison of samples prepared between ERE and conventional extruder was made and demonstrated the sample prepared by ERE can exhibit better mechanical properties. Differential scanning calorimetry results revealed that PET can promote the crystallinity of LLDPE. Rheological behavior indicated that the complex viscosity of the blends exhibited strong shear thinning phenomenon with increasing LLDPE content, particularly in high‐frequency range blend with the LLDPE weight ratio of 80 wt % was more sensitivity to shear rate than neat LLDPE. The G′‐G″ curves of the blends also revealed that the microstructure of the blends changed significantly with the addition of LLDPE which was consistent with the scanning electron micrographs that PET particles became smaller and distributed more uniform with increasing LLDPE content. Furthermore, the blends showed similar stress relaxation mechanism with adding LLDPE content from 60 to 100 wt %. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46489.     

Effects of different compatibilizers on the rheological,thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposites

The influence of two different compatibilizers and their combination (maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene, HDPE‐g‐MA; maleic anhydride grafted linear low density polyethylene, LLDPE‐g‐MA; and 50/50 wt % mixture of these compatibilizers) on the rheological, thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE/organoclay blend‐based nanocomposites was evaluated. Nanocomposites were obtained by melt‐intercalation in a torque rheometer in two steps. Masterbatches (compatibilizer/nanoclay 2:1) were obtained and subsequently diluted in the HDPE/LLDPE matrix producing nanocomposites with 2.5 wt % of nanoclay. Wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), steady‐state rheological properties, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to determine the influence of different compatibilizer systems on intercalation and/or exfoliation process which occurs preferentially in the amorphous phase, and thermomechanical properties. The LLDPE‐g‐MA with a high melt index (and consequently low viscosity and crystallinity) was an effective compatibilizer for this system. Furthermore, the compatibilized nanocomposites with LLDPE‐g‐MA or mixture of HDPE‐g‐MA and LLDPE‐g‐MA exhibited better nanoclay's dispersion and distribution with stronger interactions between the matrix and the nanoclay. These results indicated that the addition of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene facilitates both, the exfoliation and/or intercalation of the clays and its adhesion to HDPE/LLDPE blend. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 1726–1735, 2013     

Polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride to improve wettability of liquid on polyethylene films

Blends of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and LLDPE grafted maleic anhydride (LLDPE‐g‐MA) were prepared by melt mixing. The surface of cast films with different contents and types of maleated PE were characterized through contact angle and wetting tension measurements, as well as attenuated total reflection IR spectroscopy. The tensile properties and light transmission of extruded films, as well as the performance of these films compared with commercial “antifog” films, for greenhouses were determined. The carbonyl polar groups on the surface of LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MA blends increased, and the equilibrium contact angles of water and dimethylformamide decreased when the content of maleated PE increased. Films made with these blends showed a noticeable reduction in water drop formation as the MA content was increased and when using LLDPE‐g‐MA of lower molecular weight. The light transmission through these films under condensation was improved when using increased contents of MA, which promotes better wetting of the water on the surface. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 1802–1808, 2001     

Correlation between the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate/linear low‐density polyethylene blends: Effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization

The effects of the blend composition and compatibilization on the morphology of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends were studied. The blends showed dispersed/matrix and cocontinuous phase morphologies that depended on the composition. The blends had a cocontinuous morphology at an EVA concentration of 40–60%. The addition of the compatibilizer first decreased the domain size of the dispersed phase, which then leveled off. Two types of compatibilizers were added to the polymer/polymer interface: linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and LLDPE‐g phenolic resin. Noolandi's theory was in agreement with the experimental data. The conformation of the compatibilizer at the blend interface could be predicted by the calculation of the area occupied by the compatibilizer molecule at the interface. The effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were analyzed from ?60°C to +35°C. The experiments were performed over a series of frequencies. The area under the curve of the loss modulus versus the temperature was higher than the values obtained by group contribution analysis. The loss tangent curve showed a peak corresponding to the glass transition of EVA, indicating the incompatibility of the blend system. The damping characteristics of the blends increased with increasing EVA content because of the decrease in the crystalline volume of the system. Attempts were made to correlate the observed viscoelastic properties of the blends with the morphology. Various composite models were used to model the dynamic mechanical data. Compatibilization increased the storage modulus of the system because of the fine dispersion of EVA domains in the LLDPE matrix, which provided increased interfacial interaction. Better compatibilization was effected at a 0.5–1% loading of the compatibilizer. This was in full agreement with the dynamic mechanical spectroscopy data. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4526–4538, 2006     

Influence of a compatibilizer on the properties of polyethylene–octene elastomer/starch blends

The effect of a compatibilizer on the properties of corn starch‐reinforced metallocene polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) blends was studied. The compatibility between POE and starch was improved markedly with an acrylic acid‐grafted POE (POE‐g‐AA) copolymer as a compatibilizer. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine the blends produced. The size of the starch phase increased with an increasing content of starch for noncompatibilized and compatibilized blends. The POE/starch blends compatibilized with the POE‐g‐AA copolymer lowered the size of the starch phase and had a fine dispersion and homogeneity of starch in the POE matrix. This better dispersion was due to the formation of branched and crosslinked macromolecules because the POE‐g‐AA copolymer had anhydride groups to react with the hydroxyls. This was reflected in the mechanical properties of the blends, especially the tensile strength at break. In a comparison with pure POE, the decrease in the tensile strength was slight for compatibilized blends containing up to 40 wt % starch. The POE‐g‐AA copolymer was an effective compatibilizer because only a small amount was required to improve the mechanical properties of POE/starch blends. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1792–1798, 2002     

Linear low‐density polyethylene/(soya powder) blends containing polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) as a compatibilizer

Blends were made from linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and various amounts of soya powder. The soya powder content was varied from 5 to 20 wt%. Polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (PE‐g‐MA) was used as a compatibilizer. Tensile strength and elongation at break (EB) decreased with increasing soya powder content. However, Young's modulus increased with the incorporation of soya powder. The addition of PE‐g‐MA as a compatibilizer increased the tensile strength, EB, and modulus of the blends. The interfacial adhesion between soya powder and LLDPE was improved by the incorporation of PE‐g‐MA, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Increasing the content of soya powder reduced the crystallinity of the LLDPE phase. The addition of PE‐g‐MA had no significant effect on melting temperature, but the degree of crystallinity of the LLDPE was increased. The thermal stability of the blends was determined by using thermogravimetric analysis. Thermal stability decreased with increasing soya powder loading. However, the addition of PE‐g‐MA slightly increased the thermal stability of LLDPE/(soya powder) blends. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Covulcanization of LLDPE/EMA blends using dicumyl peroxide

The effect of dicumyl peroxide (DCP) content on the gel fraction, mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and thermal properties of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate (EMA) blends were studied. Gel content of the blends increases with increasing DCP content, and EMA is more prone to crosslinking than LLDPE. Wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to study the effect of DCP crosslinking on percent crystallinity and crystalline structure of the blends and individual components. At lower level of DCP loading, crosslinking process does not have significant effect on the crystalline structure of the LLDPE, which was confirmed from the percent crystallinity and lattice distance value. However, at higher DCP content, percent crystallinity decreases significantly. At lower EMA concentration (<50%), percent crystallinity and lattice distance remain unchanged up to 2 wt % of DCP. For EMA contents of more than 50 wt %, increasing DCP content reduces the crystallinity of the blends and increases the lattice distance. The highest level of mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties was observed for 60/40 LLDPE/EMA blends at 2 wt % DCP. Addition of LLDPE‐g‐MA (3 wt %) as a compatibilizer enhances the properties of the vulcanizates. Blends crosslinked with DCP up to 0.3 wt % can easily be reprocessed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of Ionomeric Compatibilizer on Clay Dispersion in Polyethylene/Clay Nanocomposites

Summary: Linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/clay nanocomposites are obtained and studied by using a zinc‐neutralized carboxylate ionomer as a compatibilizer. LLDPE‐g‐MA is used as a reference compatibilizer. Two different clays, natural montmorillonite (Closite Na⁺) and a chemically modified clay Closite 20A have been used. Nanocomposites are prepared by melt blending in a twin‐screw extruder using two mixing methods: two‐step mixing and one‐step mixing. The relative influence of each compatibilizer is determined by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction structural analysis and mechanical properties. The results are analyzed in terms of the effect of the compatibilizing agent and incorporation method in the clay dispersion, and the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites. Experimental results confirm that the film samples with ionomer show a good mechanical performance only slightly below that of the samples with maleic anhydride (MA). The two‐step mixing conditions result in better dispersion and intercalation for the nanofillers than one‐step mixing. The exfoliation of clay platelets leads to an improved thermal stability of the composite. The oxygen permeability of the clay nanocomposites, using ionomer as a compatibilizer, is decreased by the addition of the clay.

TEM image of a PE/4 wt.‐% Closite 20A nanocomposite formed using ionomer.     

Implications of melt compatibility/incompatibility on thermal and mechanical properties of metallocene and Ziegler–Natta linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends with high density polyethylene (HDPE): influence of composition distribution and branch content of LLDPE

In this paper, the implications of melt compatibility on thermal and solid‐state properties of linear low density polyethylene/high density polyethylene (LLDPE/HDPE) blends were assessed with respect to the effect of composition distribution (CD) and branch content (BC). The effect of CD was studied by melt blending a metallocene (m‐LLDPE) and a Ziegler‐Natta (ZN) LLDPE with the same HDPE at 190 °C. Similarly, the effect of BC was examined. In both cases, resins were paired to study one molecular variable at a time. Thermal and solid‐state properties were measured in a differential scanning calorimeter and in an Instron mechanical testing instrument, respectively. The low‐BC m‐LLDPE (BC = 14.5 CH₃/1000 C) blends with HDPE were compatible at all compositions: rheological, thermal and some mechanical properties followed additivity rules. For incompatible high‐BC (42.0 CH₃/1000 C) m‐LLDPE‐rich blends, elongation at break and work of rupture showed synergistic effects, while modulus was lower than predictions of linear additivity. The CD of LLDPE showed no significant effect on thermal properties, elongation at break or work of rupture; however, it resulted in low moduli for ZN‐LLDPE blends with HDPE. For miscible blends, no effect for BC or CD of LLDPE was observed. The BC of LLDPE has, in general, a stronger influence on melt and solid‐state properties of blends than the CD. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Improved compatibility of PET/HDPE blend by using GMA grafted thermoplastic elastomer

ABSTRACT

Herein, graft-modified ethylene-1-octene copolymer (POE-g-GMA) and styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer (SBS-g-GMA) were found to be excellent reactive compatibilizers for immiscible poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/high-density polyethylene (HDPE) blends via in-situ reaction compatibilization. With increase in compatibilizer amount, uniform phase morphology was observed in all the blends. Thus, exhibiting enhanced mechanical properties, especially, the notched Izod impact strength. In comparison with SBS-g-GMA, compatibilizer POE-g-GMA demonstrated greater impact on the compatibility. The addition of 15% POE-g-GMA produced blends with best mechanical properties. Besides, both POE-g-GMA and SBS-g-GMA enhanced the melt viscosity of PET/HDPE blends.     

Structure and Properties of Maleated Linear Low‐Density Polyethylene and Cellulose Acetate Butyrate Blends

Summary: Blends of M‐LLDPE and CAB were prepared in an internal laboratory mixer with 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 wt.‐% of CAB. Structure and properties of the blends were studied by means of tensile tests, DSC, SEM, extraction with a selective solvent, Raman spectroscopy and XRD. Blends prepared with 5 and 10 wt.‐% of CAB displayed the best mechanical properties. SEM and extraction with a selective solvent followed by Raman spectroscopy showed good interfacial adhesion between CAB and M‐LLDPE. No significant change on the melting temperatures (T_m) of the M‐LLDPE/CAB blends could be observed when compared with the T_m obtained for pure M‐LLDPE. XRD demonstrated that the addition of CAB has no influence on the lattice constants of M‐LLDPE, but the introduction of CAB increased the amorphous region, confirming that the miscibility occurs on the amorphous region of the polyethylene.

SEM image of the cryofracture surface of CAB‐20%.     

Studies on morphology and thermomechanical performance of ABS/PC/organoclay hybrids

In the present research, poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene)/polycarbonate (ABS/PC) blends were prepared in a twin screw extruder. An attempt to reinforce and promote compatibility of the above systems was made by the incorporation of organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT, Cloisite 30B), as well as by the addition of compatibilizer (ABS grafted with maleic anhydride, ABS‐g‐MAH), and the effect of those treatments on the morphology, thermal transitions, rheological, and mechanical properties of the above blends was evaluated. The addition of compatibilizer in ABS/PC blends does not significantly affect the glass transition temperature (T_g) of SAN and PC phases, whereas the incorporation of Cloisite 30B decreases slightly the T_g values of SAN and, more significantly, that of PC in compatibilized and uncompatibilized blends. The T_g of PB phase remains almost unaffected in all the examined systems. The obtained results suggest partial dissolution of the polymeric components of the blend and, therefore, a modified Fox equation was used to assess the amount of PC dissolved in the SAN phase of ABS and vice versa.Reinforcing with OMMT enhances the miscibility of ABS and PC phases in ABS/PC blends and gives the best performance in terms of tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and storage modulus, especially in 50/50 (w/w) ABS/PC blends. The addition of ABS‐g‐MAH compatibilizer, despite the improvement of intercalation process in organoclay/ABS/PC nanocomposites, did not seem to have any substantial effect on the mechanical properties of the examined blends. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:1395–1407, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

A study on PVC/LLDPE blends with solid-state-chlorinated polyethylene as compatibilizer

Chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) prepared by solid-state chlorination was used as compatibilizer for poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends. Effects of CPE molecular structure on stress-strain behaviors, dynamic mechanical properties, and morphologies of PVC/LLDPE blends were studied by using SEM, TEM, DMA, and testing mechanical properties. The results showed that the compatibility of PVC/LLDPE blends was improved with the addition of CPE. Also, adhesion strength between the two phases and mechanical properties of the blends were increased. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 64: 2535–2541, 1997     

Mechanical and thermal properties of calcium carbonate‐filled PP/LLDPE composite

Polymer blends typically are the most economical means to develop new resins for specific applications with the best cost/performance balance. In this paper, the mechanical properties, melting, glass transition, and crystallization behavoir of 80 phr polypropylene (PP) with varying weights of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) at 10, 20/ 20 wt % CaCO₃, 30, 40, and 50 phr were studied. A variety of physical properties such as tensile strength, impact strength, and flexural strength of these blends were evaluated. The compatibility of these composite was examined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to estimate T_m and T_c, and by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) to estimate T_g. The fractographic analysis of these blends was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It has been confirmed that increasing the LLDPE content trends to decreases the tensile strength and flexural strength. However, increasing the LLDPE content led to increases in the impact strength of PP/LLDPE blends. It was also found that up to 40 phr the corresponding melting point (T_m) was not effected with increasing LLDPE content. Each compound has more than one T_g, which was informed that there is a brittle‐ductile transition in fracture nature of these blends, the amount of material plastically deformed on the failure surface seems to increase with the increasing the LLDPE content. And PP/LLDPE blends at temperature (23°C) showed a ductile fracture mode characterized by the co‐existence of a shear yielding process; whereas at lower temperature (−20°C) the fractured surfaces of specimens appear completely brittle. The specimens broke into two pieces with no evidence of stress whitening, permanent macroscopic deformation or yielding. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of the compatibilization of linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐acrylic acid on the morphology and mechanical properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends

A poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) alloy was prepared with a reactive extrusion method. For improved compatibility of the blending system, LLDPE grafted with acrylic acid (LLDPE‐g‐AA) by radiation was adopted in place of plain LLDPE. The toughness and extensibility of the PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends, as characterized by the impact strengths and elongations at break, were much improved in comparison with the toughness and extensibility of the PBT/LLDPE blends at the same compositions. However, there was not much difference in their tensile (or flexural) strengths and moduli. Scanning electron microscopy photographs showed that the domains of PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA were much smaller and their dispersions were more homogeneous than the domains and dispersions of the PBT/LLDPE blends. Compared with the related values of the PBT/LLDPE blends, the contents and melting temperatures of the usual spherulites of PBT in PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA decreased. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 1059–1066, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10399     

Preparation and characterization of grafting styrene onto LLDPE by cyclohexane compatibilization in suspension polymerization

A novel method of grafting styrene onto linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) by suspension polymerization was systematically evaluated. Cyclohexane as a compatibilizer was introduced to swell and activate the surface of LLDPE molecular chain for amplifying the contact point of styrene monomer with LLDPE. A series of copolymer of grafting polystyrene (PS) onto LLDPE, known as LLDPE‐g‐PS, were prepared with different ratios of cyclohexane/styrene monomer and various LLDPE dosages. FTIR and ¹H NMR techniques both confirmed successful PS grafting onto the LLDPE chains. In addition, SEM images of LLDPE‐g‐PS particles showed that the cross‐section morphology becomes smooth and dense with suitable cyclohexane dosages, indicating a better compatibility between LLDPE and PS. The highest grafting efficiency was 28.4% at 10 mL/g cyclohexane and styrene monomer when 8% LLDPE was added. In these conditions, the LLDPE‐g‐PS elongation at break increased by about 30 times compared with PS. Moreover, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) demonstrated that LLDPE‐g‐PS possesses much higher thermal stability than pure PS. Therefore, the optimal amount of cyclohexane as compatibilizer could increase the grafting efficiency and improve the toughness of PS. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41671.     

Structure and oxygen‐barrier properties of (linear low‐density polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer)/linear low‐density polyethylene composite films prepared by microlayer coextrusion

Ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends with 5% LLDPE grafted with 1% maleic anhydride (MAH; EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH), created to increase the interfacial compatibility, were coextruded with pure LLDPE through the microlayer coextrusion technology. The phase morphology and gas‐barrier properties of the alternating‐layered (EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH)/LLDPE composites were studied by scanning electron microscopy observation and oxygen permeation coefficient measurement. The experimental results show that the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers were parallel to each other, and the continuity of each layer was clearly evident. This structure greatly decreased the oxygen permeability coefficient compared to the pure LLDPE and the barrier percolation threshold because of the existence of the LLDPE/EVOH/LLDPE‐g‐MAH blend layers, and the LLDPE layers diluted the concentration of EVOH in the whole composites. In addition, the effects of the layer thickness ratio of the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers and the layer number on the barrier properties of the layered composites were investigated. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42211.     

Tribological,Mechanical Properties,and Morphology of Polyphenylene Oxide/Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Blends

Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene-g-polystyrene was synthesized as a compatibilizer through a suspension-grafting copolymerization method. Various weight ratios of polyphenylene oxide/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene-g-polystyrene/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene blends were prepared by extruding, and mechanical properties, morphology as well as tribological behavior were investigated. Tensile strength, flexural strength, and Rockwell hardness increased with the increasing of the compatibilizer. Impact strength and antiwear properties of the blends were improved significantly by contrast to those of pure polyphenylene oxide. The polyphenylene oxide/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene-g-polystyrene/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene blend of 90/10/0 compared with other ratios as an optimum ratio. In this case, the wear volume and friction coefficient of the blend were 2.6% of PPO and 45% lower than PPO, respectively.