Synthesis and characterization of diblock,triblock, and multiblock copolymers containing poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate) units

A poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] macroinitiator (PHB‐MI) was obtained through the condensation reaction of poly[(R,S)‐3‐hydroxybutyrate] (PHB) oligomers containing dihydroxyl end functionalities with 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride). The PHB‐MI obtained in this way had hydroxyl groups at two end of the polymer chain and an internal azo group. The synthesis of ABA‐type PHB‐b‐PMMA block copolymers [where A is poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and B is PHB] via PHB‐MI was accomplished in two steps. First, multiblock active copolymers with azo groups (PMMA‐PHB‐MI) were prepared through the redox free‐radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with a PHB‐MI/Ce(IV) redox system in aqueous nitric acid at 40°C. Second, PMMA‐PHB‐MI was used in the thermal polymerization of MMA at 60°C to obtain PHB‐b‐PMMA. When styrene (S) was used instead of MMA in the second step, ABCBA‐type PMMA‐b‐PHB‐b‐PS multiblock copolymers [where C is polystyrene (PS)] were obtained. In addition, the direct thermal polymerization of the monomers (MMA or S) via PHB‐MI provided AB‐type diblocks copolymers with MMA and BCB‐type triblock copolymers with S. The macroinitiators and block copolymers were characterized with ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, cryoscopic measurements, and thermogravimetric analysis. The increases in the intrinsic viscosity and fractional precipitation confirmed that a block copolymer had been obtained. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1789–1796, 2004     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation of PMMA–PS–PMMA via combination of anionic and photoinduced charge‐transfer polymerization

PMMA–PS–PMMA triblock copolymers were prepared by the combination of an anionic mechanism with charge‐transfer polymerization. Polystyrene with aromatic tertiary amino groups at both ends (PS_ba) was synthesized first by the reaction of a living polystyrene macrodianion with excess p‐(dimethylamino)benzaldehyde; then, the PS_ba was constituted into a binary system with benzophenone (BP) to initiate the polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) under UV irradiation. The intermediate and resulting block copolymers were characterized by GPC, IR, and ¹H‐NMR. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2072–2076, 1999     

Synthesis of poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] through atom transfer radical polymerization

A new graft copolymers poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene (PSF‐g‐PS) and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] (PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA)) were successfully prepared via atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) catalyzed by FeCl₂/isophthalic acid in N,N‐dimethyl formamide. The products were characterized by GPC, DSC, IR, TGA and NMR. The characterization data indicated that the graft copolymerization was accomplished via conventional ATRP mechanism. The effect of chloride content of the macroinitiator on the graft copolymerization was investigated. Only one glass transition temperature (T_g) was detected by DSC for the graft copolymer PSF‐g‐PS and two glass transition temperatures were observed in the DSC curve of PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA). The presence of PSF in PSF‐b‐PS or PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA) was found to improve thermal stabilities. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of PMMA‐PTHF‐PMMA and PMMA‐PTHF‐PST linear and star block copolymers

Combination of cationic, redox free radical, and thermal free radical polymerizations was performed to obtain linear and star polytetramethylene oxide (poly‐THF)‐polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)/polystyrene (PSt) multiblock copolymers. Cationic polymerization of THF was initiated by the mixture of AgSbF₆ and bis(4,4′ bromo‐methyl benzoyl) peroxide (BBP) or bis (3,5,3′,5′ dibromomethyl benzoyl) peroxide (BDBP) at 20°C to obtain linear and star poly‐THF initiators with M_w varying from 7,500 to 59,000 Da. Poly‐THF samples with hydroxyl ends were used in the methyl methacrylate (MMA) polymerization in the presence of Ce(IV) salt at 40°C to obtain poly(THF‐b‐MMA) block copolymers containing the peroxide group in the middle. Poly(MMA‐b‐THF) linear and star block copolymers having the peroxide group in the chain were used in the polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) at 80°C to obtain PMMA‐b‐PTHF‐b‐PMMA and PMMA‐b‐PTHF‐b‐PSt linear and star multiblock copolymers. Polymers obtained were characterizated by GPC, FT‐IR, DSC, TGA, ¹H‐NMR, and ¹³C‐NMR techniques and the fractional precipitation method. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 219–226, 2004     

Surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization from Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles to prepare the well‐defined polymer‐Mg(OH)2 nanocomposites

Well‐defined polymer‐Mg(OH)₂ nanocomposites were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The ATRP initiators were covalently attached to the Mg(OH)₂ by esterification of 2‐chloropropionyl chloride with hydroxyl group. The amount of polymer grafted from Mg(OH)₂ can be controlled using a different catalyst system and adding a small amount of polar solvent. The well‐defined diblock copolymer, consisting of poly(styrene) (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were synthesized. The products were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermal gravimetric analysis. The morphologies of PS/PMMA and PS/PMMA/Mg(OH)₂‐g‐PS‐b‐PMMA blends are compared by using a scanning electron microscope. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3680–3687, 2007     

Thermal behavior and properties of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The thermal behavior and properties of immiscible blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with and without PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer at different melt blending times were investigated by use of a differential scanning calorimeter. The weight fraction of PS in the blends ranged from 0.1 to 0.9. From the measured glass transition temperature (T_g) and specific heat increment (ΔC_p) at the T_g, the PMMA appeared to dissolve more in the PS phase than did the PS in the PMMA phase. The addition of a PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends slightly promoted the solubility of the PMMA in the PS and increased the interfacial adhesion between PS and PMMA phases during processing. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the presence of the PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends afforded protection against thermal degradation and improved their thermal stability. Also, it was found that the PS was more stable against thermal degradation than that of the PMMA over the entire heating range. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 609–620, 2004     

Preparation,characterization, and thermal properties of polystyrene‐block‐quaternized poly(4‐vinylpyridine)/Montmorillonite nanocomposites

Polystyrene‐block‐poly(4‐vinylpyridine) (PS‐b‐P4VP) was synthesized by two steps of reversible addition‐fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization of styrene (St) and 4‐vinylpyridine (4VP) successively. After P4VP block was quaternized with CH₃I, PS‐b‐quaternized P4VP/montmorillonite (PS‐b‐QP4VP/MMT) nanocomposites were prepared by cationic exchange reactions of quaternary ammonium ion in the PS‐b‐QP4VP with ions in MMT. The results obtained from X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images demonstrate that the block copolymer/MMT nanocomposites are of intercalated and exfoliated structures, and also a small amount of silicates' layers remained in the original structure; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) results show that the nanocomposites displayed higher glass transition temperature (T_g) and higher thermal stability than that of the corresponding copolymers. The blending of PS‐b‐QP4VP/MMT with commercial PS makes MMT to be further separated, and the MMT was homogeneously dispersed in the polymer matrix. The enhancement of thermal stability of PS/PS‐b‐QP4VP/MMT is about 20°C in comparison with commercial PS. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102:1950–1958, 2006     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

A polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA) diblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization method and blended with a high‐molecular‐weight poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). In this A‐b‐B/C type of diblock copolymer/homopolymer system, semi‐crystallizable PVDF (C) and PMMA (B) block are miscible due to favorable intermolecular interactions. However, the A block (PDMS) is immiscible with PVDF and therefore generates nanostructured morphology via self‐assembly. Crystallization study reveals that both α and γ crystalline phases of PVDF are present in the blends with up to 30 wt% of PDMS‐b‐PMMA block copolymer. Adding 10 wt% of PVDF to PDMS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer leads to worm‐like micelle morphology of PDMS of 10 nm in diameter and tens of nanometers in length. Moreover, morphological results show that PDMS nanostructures are localized in the inter‐fibrillar region of PVDF with the addition of up to 20 wt% of the block copolymer. Increase of PVDF long period by 45% and decrease of degree of crystallization by 34% confirm the localization of PDMS in the PVDF inter‐fibrillar region. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Amphiphilic block copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene: synthesis and self‐assembly

The triblock energetic copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene (PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS) was synthesized successfully through atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene and ring‐opening polymerization of d,l ‐lactide. The energetic macroinitiator GAP‐Br, which was made from reacting equimolar GAP with α‐bromoisobutyryl bromide, firstly triggered the ATRP of styrene with its bromide group, and then the hydroxyl group on the GAP end of the resulting diblock copolymer participated in the polymerization of lactide in the presence of stannous octoate. The triblock copolymer PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS had a narrow distribution of molecular weight. In the copolymer, the PS block was solvophilic in toluene and improved the stability of the structure, the PLA block was solvophobic in toluene and served as the sacrificial component for the preparation of porous materials, and GAP was the basic and energetic material. The three blocks of the copolymer were fundamentally thermodynamically immiscible, which led to the self‐assembly of the block copolymer in solution. Further studies showed that the concentration and solubility of the copolymer and the polarity of the solvent affected the morphology and size of the micelles generated from the self‐assembly of PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS. The micelles generated in organic solvents at 10 mg mL^?1 copolymer concentration were spherical but became irregular when water was used as a co‐solvent. The spherical micelles self‐assembled in toluene had three distinct layers, with the diameter of the micelles increasing from 60 to 250 nm as the concentration of the copolymer increased from 5 to 15 mg L^?1. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of mixing protocol on compatibilized polymer blend morphology

We investigated the effect of mixing protocol on the morphology of compatibilized polymer blends made with premade compatibilizer and reactively formed in‐situ compatibilizer in a custom‐built miniature mixer Alberta Polymer Asymmetric Minimixer (APAM). The compatibilized blends show a finer morphology than uncompatibilized blends if the polymers are mixed together in the dry state and then fed into the mixer. It is found that premelting one polymer, and premixing polymers and compatibilizer, both greatly affect the compatibilized blends' morphology. The effects are complex since the dispersed phase particle size and distribution of the compatibilized blends may be smaller or larger when compared with the uncompatibilized system, depending on the material's physical and chemical properties; for example, diblock molecular weight or the preference of copolymer to migrate to a particular phase can change the final morphology. Good mobility of the copolymer to reach the interface is crucial to obtain a finer morphology. Micelles are observed when a high molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) is used for a PS/PMMA blend. Because of its enhanced mobility, no micelles are found for a low molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) in a PS/PMMA blend. For PS/PE/P(S‐b‐E) blends, finer morphology is obtained when P(S‐b‐E) is first precompounded with PS. Because the block copolymer prefers the PE phase, if the P(S‐b‐E) block copolymer is compounded with PE first, some remains inside the PE phase and does not compatibilize the interface. In the case of reactive blend PSOX/PEMA, premelting and holding the polymers at high temperature for 5 min decreases final dispersed phase particle size; however, premelting and holding for 10 min coarsens the morphology. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:691–702, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Synthesis of methyl methacrylate and N‐aryl itaconimide block copolymers via atom‐transfer radical polymerization

The paper describes the synthesis of block copolymers of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and N‐aryl itaconimides using atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) via a poly(methyl methacrylate)–Cl/CuBr/bipyridine initiating system or a reverse ATRP AIBN/FeCl₃·6H₂O/PPh₃ initiating system. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) macroinitiator, ie with a chlorine chain‐end (PMMA‐Cl), having a predetermined molecular weight (M_n = 1.27 × 10⁴ g mol^?1) and narrow polydispersity index (PDI = 1.29) was prepared using AIBN/FeCl₃·6H₂O/PPh₃, which was then used to polymerize N‐aryl itaconimides. Increase in molecular weight with little effect on polydispersity was observed on polymerization of N‐aryl itaconimides using the PMMA‐Cl/CuBr/Bpy initiating system. Only oligomeric blocks of N‐aryl itaconimides could be incorporated in the PMMA backbone. High molecular weight copolymer with a narrow PDI (1.43) could be prepared using tosyl chloride (TsCl) as an initiator and CuBr/bipyridine as catalyst when a mixture of MMA and N‐(p‐chlorophenyl) itaconimide in the molar ratio of 0.83:0.17 was used. Thermal characterization was performed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic thermogravimetry. DSC traces of the block copolymers showed two shifts in base‐line in some of the block copolymers; the first transition corresponds to the glass transition temperature of PMMA and second transition corresponds to the glass transition temperature of poly(N‐aryl itaconimides). A copolymer obtained by taking a mixture of monomers ie MMA:N‐(p‐chlorophenyl) itaconimide in the molar ratio of 0.83:0.17 showed a single glass transition temperature. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Surface microphase separation in PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films

Well‐defined poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐heptafluorobutyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films was investigated. The microstructure of the block copolymers was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surface composition was studied by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The chemical composition at the surface was determined by the surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films. The increase of the PHFBMA content could strengthen the microphase separation behavior in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films and reduce their surface tension. Comparison between the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymers and the PDMS‐b‐PHFBMA diblock copolymers showed that the introduction of the PMMA segments promote the fluorine segregation onto the surface and decrease the fluorine content in the copolymers with low surface energy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Fe‐mediated SET‐LRP of MMA and St in the presence of air

In this work, well‐defined homopolymers of methyl methacrylate (PMMA) and styrene (PSt) were prepared via single‐electron‐transfer living radical polymerization using CCl₄ as initiator and Fe(0)/N, N, N′,N′‐tetramethyl‐1,2‐ethanediamine as catalyst. The polymerization was conducted at 25 °C in N,N‐dimethylformamide in the presence of air. It proceeded in a ‘living’ manner, as indicated by the first‐order kinetics behavior, and the linear increase of the number‐average molecular weight (M_{n, GPC}) with conversion was close to the theoretical M_{n, theory}. Solvent and additives have a profound effect on the polymerization. In addition, the PMMA and PSt obtained remained of low dispersity. The chain‐end functionality of the obtained homopolymer of PMMA was characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance. A block copolymer of P(MMA‐block‐St) was achieved by using the obtained PMMA as macroinitiator. The living characteristics were further demonstrated by chain extension experiments. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene/poly(4‐vinylpyridine) triblock copolymers by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization and their self‐assembled aggregates in water

Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) was developed for the controlled preparation of polystyrene (PS)/poly(4‐vinylpyridine) (P4VP) triblock copolymers. First, PS and P4VP homopolymers were prepared using dibenzyl trithiocarbonate as the chain transfer agent (CTA). Then, PS‐b‐P4VP‐b‐PS and P4VP‐b‐PS‐b‐P4VP triblock copolymers were synthesized using as macro‐CTA the obtained homopolymers PS and P4VP, respectively. The synthesized polymers had relatively narrower molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n < 1.25), and the polymerization was controlled/living. Furthermore, the polymerization rate appeared to be lower when styrene was polymerized using P4VP as the macro‐CTA, compared with polymerizing 4‐vinylpyridine using PS as the macro‐CTA. This was attributed to the different transfer constants of the P4VP and PS macro‐CTAs to the styrene and the 4‐vinylpyridine, respectively. The aggregates of the triblock copolymers with different compositions and chain architectures in water also were investigated, and the results are presented. Reducing the P4VP block length and keeping the PS block constant favored the formation of rod aggregates. Moreover, the chain architecture in which the P4VP block was in the middle of the copolymer chain was rather favorable to the rod assembly because of the entropic penalty associated with the looping of the middle‐block P4VP to form the aggregate corona and tailing of the end‐block PS into the core of the aggregates. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1017–1025, 2003     

Controllable radical copolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis(trimethylsilyloxy) ethane as initiator

Copolymerization of styrene (St) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) was carried out using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis (trimethylsilyloxy) ethane (TPSE) as initiator; the copolymerization proceeded via a “living” radical mechanism and the polymer molecular weight (M_w) increased with the conversion and polymerization time. The reactivity ratios for TPSE and azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) systems calculated by Finemann–Ross method were r_St = 0.216 ± 0.003, r_MMA= 0.403 ± 0.01 for the former and r_St= 0.52 ± 0.01, r_MMA= 0.46 ± 0.01 for the latter, respectively, and the difference between them and the effect of polymerization conditions on copolymerization are discussed. Thermal analysis proved that the copolymers obtained by TPSE system showed higher sequence regularity than that obtained by the AIBN system, and the sequence regularity increased with the content of styrene in copolymer chain segment. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1474–1482, 2001     

Synthesis of poly(paraphenylene vinylene)—polystyrene‐based rod‐coil block copolymer by atom transfer radical polymerization: Toward a self‐organized lamellar semiconducting material

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was used as a versatile route to well‐defined poly(diethylhexyl‐p‐phenylenevinylene‐b‐styrene) (PPV‐b‐PS) semiconducting block copolymers. For this purpose, original conjugated macroinitiators were synthesized from DEH‐PPV and further used for the copolymerization reaction. The microphase‐separated morphologies obtained with the semiconducting PPV‐b‐PS block copolymer fulfill the basic structural requirements required to build efficient organic photovoltaic devices. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Synthesis and characterization of AB‐type copolymers poly(L‐lactide)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) via a convenient route combining ROP and ATRP from a dual initiator

Diblock copolymers of poly(L ‐lactide)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLLA‐b‐PMMA) were synthesized through a sequential two‐step strategy, which combines ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), using a bifunctional initiator, 2,2,2‐trichloroethanol. The trichloro‐terminated poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA‐Cl) with high molecular weight (M_n,GPC = 1–12 × 10⁴ g/mol) was presynthesized through bulk ROP of L ‐lactide (L ‐LA), initiated by the hydroxyl group of the double‐headed initiator, with tin(II) octoate (Sn(Oct)₂) as catalyst. The second segment of the block copolymer was synthesized by the ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA), with PLLA‐Cl as macroinitiator and CuCl/N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as catalyst, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was chosen as reaction medium due to the poor solubility of the macroinitiator in conventional solvents at the reaction temperature. The trichloroethoxyl terminal group of the macroinitiator was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. The comprehensive results from GPC, FTIR, ¹H‐NMR analysis indicate that diblock copolymers PLLA‐b‐PMMA (M_n,GPC = 5–13 × 10⁴ g/mol) with desired molecular composition were obtained by changing the molar ratio of monomer/initiator. DSC, XRD, and TG analyses establish that the crystallization of copolymers is inhibited with the introduction of PMMA segment, which will be beneficial to ameliorating the brittleness, and furthermore, to improving the thermal performance. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

The synthesis of PHA‐g‐(PTHF‐b‐PMMA) multiblock/graft copolymers by combination of cationic and radical polymerization

A new and promising method for the diversification of microbial polyesters based on chemical modifications is introduced. Poly(3‐hydroxy alkanoate)‐g‐(poly(tetrahydrofuran)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate)) (PHA‐g‐(PTHF‐b‐PMMA)) multigraft copolymers were synthesized by the combination of cationic and free radical polymerization. PHA‐g‐PTHF graft copolymer was obtained by the cationic polymerization of THF initiated by the carbonium cations generated from the chlorinated PHAs, poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHx) in the presence of AgSbF₆. Therefore, PHA‐g‐PTHF graft copolymers with hydroxyl ends were produced. In the presence of Ce⁺⁴ salt, these hydroxyl ends of the graft copolymer can initiate the redox polymerization of MMA to obtain PHA‐g‐(PTHF‐b‐PMMA) multigraft copolymer. Polymers obtained were purified by fractional precipitation. In this manner, their γ‐values (volume ratio of nonsolvent to the solvent) were also determined. Their molecular weights were determined by GPC technique. The structures were elucidated using ¹H‐NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Thermal analyses of the products were carried out using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009