Characteristics of impact modified polystyrene/organoclay nanocomposites

The poor impact resistance of Polystyrene (PS) was enhanced by the addition of elastomeric material, SEBS‐g‐MA. To prevent the reduction in strength and stiffness, organoclay Cloisite® 25A was used as filler and introduced into the matrix by a corotating twin screw extruder. Throughout the study, the clay content was kept at 2 wt%, whereas the content of SEBS‐g‐MA was varied between 5 and 40 wt%. It was found that Cloisite® 25A displays well dispersion in the ternary nanocomposites and the degree of dispersion increases with the elastomer content. The elastomeric phase has a greater viscosity than pure PS. Thus, as expected, at low elastomer contents, it forms the dispersed phase in the matrix as droplets. Transmission electron microscopy results show that the clay layers reside at the interphase between PS and elastomer and also inside the elastomeric phase. Owing to the location of the clay particles, the average elastomer domain size in ternary nanocomposites are found to be greater than that in the relative binary blends of PS‐(SEBS‐g‐MA). Moreover, with the organoclay addition, phase inversion point shifts to lower elastomer contents. The mechanical test results showed that the nanocomposites containing 15 and 20 wt% SEBS‐g‐MA have the optimum average domain size that results in high‐impact strength values without deteriorating the tensile properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1853–1861, 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Physical and mechanical properties of nanocomposite barrier film containing encapsulated nanoclay

Waterborne poly(styrene‐co‐butyl acrylate) was prepared via miniemulsion polymerization in which nanoclay (Cloisite® 30B, modified natural MMT) in different concentrations was encapsulated. Scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy confirmed the encapsulation and intercalated‐exfoliated structure of Cloisite® 30B within poly(styrene‐co‐butyl acrylate). The effect of nanoclay content on water vapor permeability, water uptake, oxygen permeability, thermal, and mechanical properties of thin films containing 1.5, 2.56, 3.5, and 5.3 wt % encapsulated Cloisite® 30B in poly(styrene‐co‐butyl acrylate) was investigated. The presence of encapsulated Cloisite® 30B within the polymer matrix improved tensile strength, Young's modulus, and toughness of the nanocomposites depending on the nanoclay content. Water vapor transmission rate, oxygen barrier properties, and thermal stability were also improved. The results indicated that the incorporation of Cloisite® 30B in the form of encapsulated platelets improved physicomechanical properties of the nanoclay‐polymer composite barrier films. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Preparation and characterization of low density polyethylene/ethylene methyl acrylate glycidyl methacrylate/organoclay nanocomposites

The effects of organoclay type, compatibilizer, and the addition order of components during melt‐blending process on the morphology and thermal, mechanical, and flow properties of ternary nanocomposites based on low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) were investigated. As a compatibilizer, ethylene/methyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate (E‐MA‐GMA), as organoclays Cloisites® 15A, 25A, and 30B were used. All samples were prepared by a corotating twin screw extruder, followed by injection molding. The highest increase of the basal spacing for ternary nanocomposites was obtained in LDPE/E‐MA‐GMA/Cloisite® 30B nanocomposites with interlayer spacing of 59.2 Å. Organoclay and compatibilizer addition did not influence the melting/crystallization behavior of the compositions, and both compatibilizer and organoclays had no significant nucleation activity in LDPE. Among the ternary nanocomposites, the maximum increase in tensile strength and tensile modulus values was observed for nanocomposites containing organoclay Cloisite® 15A. The improvement with respect to neat LDPE was 43% for tensile strength and 44% for tensile modulus. According to the mechanical analysis, the best sequence of component addition was the one in which LDPE, organoclay, and compatibilizer were simultaneously fed to the extruder in the first run, and the product of the first run was extruded once more. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Morphology and flame‐retardancy properties of ternary high‐impact polystyrene/elastomer/polystyrene‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide composites

The effects of elastomer type on the morphology, flammability, and mechanical properties of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS)/polystyrene (PS)‐encapsulated magnesium hydroxide (MH) were investigated. The ternary composites were characterized by cone calorimetry, mechanical testing, and scanning electron microscopy. Morphology was controlled with poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS) triblock copolymer or the corresponding maleinated poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA). The HIPS/SEBS/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited separation of the filler and elastomer, whereas the HIPS/SEBS‐g‐MA/PS‐encapsulated MH composites exhibited encapsulation of the filler by SEBS‐g‐MA. The flame‐retardant and mechanical properties of the ternary composites were strongly dependent on microstructure. The composites with an encapsulation structure showed higher flame‐retardant properties than those with a separation structure at the optimum use level of SEBS‐g‐MA. Furthermore, the composites with a separation structure showed a higher modulus and impact strength than those with an encapsulation structure. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Influences of compatibilizers on rheology and mechanical properties of propylene random copolymer/styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer/organic‐montmorillonite nanocomposites

Propylene random copolymer (PPR)/styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS)/compatibilizer/organic‐montmorillonite (OMMT) quaternary nanocomposites and PPR/compatibilizer/OMMT ternary nanocomposites were prepared via two‐stage melt blending and influences of compatibilizers, maleic anhydride (MA) grafted styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), poly(octene‐co‐ethylene) (POE‐g‐MA), or propylene block copolymers (PPB‐g‐MA), on rheology and mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were investigated. The results of X‐ray diffraction measurement and transmission electron microscopy observation showed that OMMT layers were mainly intercalated in the nanocomposites except for the mainly exfoliated structure in the quaternary nanocomposites using POE‐g‐MA as compatibilizer. The nanocomposites exhibited pseudo‐solid like viscoelasticity in low frequencies and shear‐thinning in high shear rates. As far as OMMT dispersion was concerned, POE‐g‐MA was superior to SEBS‐g‐MA and PPB‐g‐MA, which gives rise to the highest viscosities in both the ternary and quaternary nanocomposites. The quaternary nanocomposites containing POE‐g‐MA were endowed with balanced toughness and rigidity. It was suggested that a suitable combination of compatibilizer and SEBS was an essentially important factor for adjusting the OMMT dispersion and distribution, the rheological and mechanical performances of the nanocomposites. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Processing and properties of modified polyamide 66-organoclay nanocomposites

Binary polyamide 66 nanocomposites containing 2 wt % organoclay, polyamide 66 blend containing 5 wt % impact modifier, and ternary polyamide 66 nanocomposites containing 2 wt % organoclay and 5 wt % impact modifier were prepared by melt compounding method. The effects of E-GMA and the types of the organoclays on the interaction between the organoclay and the polymer, dispersion of the organoclay, morphology, mechanical, flow, and thermal properties of the nanocomposites were investigated. Partial exfoliation and improved mechanical properties are observed for Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 25A nanocomposites. On the other hand, the organoclay was intercalated or in the form of tactoids in Cloisite® 30B nanocomposites. Components of the nanocomposites containing Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 25A were compounded in different addition orders. Mixing sequence of the components affected both the dispersion of the organoclay and the mechanical properties drastically. SEM analyses revealed that homogeneous dispersion of the organoclay results in a decrease in the domain sizes and promotes the improvements in the toughness of the materials. Melt viscosity was also found to have a profound effect on the dispersion of the organoclay according to MFI and XRD results. Crystallinity of the nanocomposites did not change significantly. It is only the type of the constituents and their addition order what dramatically influence the nanocomposite properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2008     

Mechanical properties of wollastonite‐reinforced polypropylene composites modified with SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA elastomers

Mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene/wollastonite/styrene rubber block copolymers (iPP/wollastonite/SRBC) composites were studied as a function of elastomeric poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) triblock copolymer (SEBS) and SEBS grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) content from 0 to 20 vol%. Microphase morphology was stronger influenced by SRBC elastomers than by different wollastonite types. Higher encapsulation ability of SEBS‐g‐MA than SEBS caused more expressive core‐shell morphology and consequently higher notched impact strength as well as yield parameters, but lower Young's modulus. Higher ductility of the composites with SEBS than with SEBS‐g‐MA has been primarily caused by better miscibility of the polypropylene chains with SEBS molecules. Surface properties of components and adhesion parameters also indicated that adhesion at SEBS‐g‐MA/wollastonite interface, which was stronger than the one at the SEBS/wollastonite interface, influenced higher encapsulation of wollastonite particles by SEBS‐g‐MA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1873–1880, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Mechanical and rheological properties of PP/SEBS/OMMT ternary composites

The microstructure and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/OMMT binary nanocomposites and PP/styrene‐6‐(ethylene‐co‐butylenes)‐6‐styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS)/OMMT ternary nanocomposites were investigated using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and rheology and electromechanical testing machine. The results show that the organoclay layers are mainly intercalated and partially exfoliated in the PP‐based nanocomposites. The additions of SEBS and OMMT have no significant effect on the crystallization behavior of PP. At the same time, it can be concluded that the polymer chains of PP and SEBS have intercalated into the organoclay layers and increase the gallery distance after blending process based on the analytical results from TEM, XRD, and rheology, which result in the form of a percolated nanostructure in the PP‐based nanocomposites. The results of mechanical properties show that SEBS filler greatly improve the notched impact strength of PP, but with the sacrifice of strength and stiffness. OMMT can improve the strength and stiffness of PP and slightly enhance the notched impact strength of PP/PP‐g‐MA. In comparison with neat PP, PP/OMMT, and PP/SEBS binary composites, notched impact toughness of the PP/SEBS/OMMT ternary composites significantly increase. Moreover, the stiffness and strength of PP/SEBS/OMMT ternary nanocomposites are slightly enhanced when compared with neat PP. It is believed that the synergistic effect of both SEBS elastomer and OMMT nanoparticles account for the balanced mechanical performance of the ternary nanocomposites. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Phase structure and morphology of wollastonite‐reinforced polypropylene composites modified with SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA elastomers

Supermolecular structure of isotactic polypropylene/wollastonite/styrenic rubber block copolymers composites were studied as a function of elastomeric poly‐ (styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) triblock copolymer (SEBS) and the SEBS grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) content (from 0 to 20 vol%) by optical, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Wollastonite particles disturbed the spherulitization of polypropylene matrix. Both elastomers affected the crystallization of polypropylene matrix mainly by solidification effect. Although SEBS‐g‐MA encapsulated wollastonite particles more expressive than SEBS forming thus core‐shell morphology in higher extent, scanning electron micrographs indicated more constrained wollastonite particles in fractured surfaces of composites with SEBS elastomer. Moreover, SEBS‐g‐MA disorientated wollastonite particles and affected reorientation of the polypropylene crystallites stronger than SEBS elastomer. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:2145–2154, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and properties of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer/clay nanocomposites: I. Effect of clay content and compatibilizer types

BACKGROUND: Polymer/clay (silicate) systems exhibit great promise for industrial applications due to their ability to display synergistically advanced properties with relatively small amounts of clay loads. The effects of various compatibilizers on styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS)/clay nanocomposites with various amounts of clay using a melt mixing process are investigated. RESULTS: SEBS/clay nanocomposites were prepared via melt mixing. Two types of maleated compatibilizers, styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer grafted maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA), were incorporated to improve the dispersion of various amounts of commercial organoclay (denoted as 20A). Experimental samples were analyzed using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Thermal stability was enhanced through the addition of clay with or without compatibilizers. The dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties indicated enhanced interaction for the compatibilized nanocomposites. In particular, the PP‐g‐MA compatibilized system conferred higher tensile strength or Young's modulus than the SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilized system, although SEBS‐g‐MA seemed to further expand the interlayer spacing of the clay compared with PP‐g‐MA. CONCLUSION: These unusual results suggest that the matrix properties and compatibilizer types are crucial factors in attaining the best mechanical property performance at a specific clay content. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

Impact modified polyamide‐6/organoclay nanocomposites: Processing and characterization

The effects of melt state compounding of ethylene‐butyl acrylate‐maleic anhydride (E‐BA‐MAH) terpolymer and/or three types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A, 25A, and 30B) on thermal and mechanical properties and morphology of polyamide‐6 are investigated. E‐BA‐MAH formed spherical domains in the materials to which it is added, and increased the impact strength, whereas the organoclays decreased the impact strength. In general, the organoclays increased the tensile strength (except for Cloisite 15A), Young's modulus and elongation at break, but the addition of E‐BA‐MAH had the opposite effect. XRD patterns showed that the interlayer spacing for the organoclays Cloisite 25A and Cloisite 30B increased in both polyamide‐6/organoclay binary nanocomposites and in polyamide‐6/organoclay/impact modifier ternary systems. TEM analysis showed that exfoliated‐intercalated nanocomposites were formed. The crystallinities of polyamide‐6/organoclay nanocomposites were in general lower than that of polyamide‐6 (except for Cloisite 15A). In ternary nanocomposites, crystallinities generally were lower than those of polyamide‐6/organoclay nanocomposites. Cloisite 15A containing ternary nanocomposites had higher tensile and impact strengths and Young's modulus than the ternary nanocomposites prepared with Cloisite 25A and Cloisite 30B, owing to its surface hydrophobicity and compatibility with the impact modifier. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

The supermolecular structure of isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene blends

The supermolecular structure of binary isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene (iPP/PS) injection‐molded blends were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and optical microscopy. The combination of different methods gives a possibility of analysis of relation between the phase transformation in polypropylene and crystallization parameters. Effect of compatibilization of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) block copolymers in the iPP/PS blends on the structure, nucleation, crystal growth, solidification, and the phase morphology was analyzed. We found that the β‐crystallization tendency of polypropylene matrix can be enhanced by adding atactic polystyrene. However, the incorporation of SEBS‐g‐MA into iPP/PS blends resulted in an important decrease in β‐content of iPP. It is evident that the presence of compatibilizing agent caused a very significant reduction of the α‐spherulite growth rates and the crystal conversion as well as increases of half‐time crystallization in comparison with the iPP/PS systems. The relation between kinetic parameters of crystallization process and polymorphic structure of iPP in blend systems has been satisfactorily explained. Moreover, a strong effect of processing parameters on the β‐phase formation was observed. The results clearly show that at a higher temperature of mold and lower injection speed, the amount of β‐phase of iPP matrix slightly decreases. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Clay‐containing block copolymer nanocomposites with aligned morphology prepared by extrusion

Clay‐containing nanocomposites of polystyrene‐b‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐polystyrene (SEBS) copolymers having cylindrical domains were obtained by melt extrusion using a tape die. One type of sample (SEBS‐MA) had maleic anhydride attached to the middle block. Two types of organoclays were added, namely Cloisite 20A and Cloisite 30B. Small angle X‐ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses showed that the addition of 20A clay to SEBS and SEBS‐MA resulted in nanocomposites with intercalated and partially exfoliated structures, respectively. The addition of 30B clay to SEBS and SEBS‐MA promoted the formation of composites containing relatively large micron‐sized and partially exfoliated clay particles, respectively. Our TEM analysis revealed that clay particles embedded in SEBS are preferably in contact with the polystyrene cylindrical domains, while in SEBS‐MA they are in contact with the maleated matrix. The extrusion processing promoted alignment of the axes of the polystyrene cylinders along the extrusion direction in all samples, and the basal planes of the clay particles were mostly parallel to the main external surfaces of the extruded tapes. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Interfacial modification of high impact polystyrene magnesium hydroxide composites effects on flame retardancy properties

High impact polystyrene (HIPS)/magnesium hydroxide (MH) composites were prepared by melt‐blending. Two kinds of interfacial modifiers were used in this research, maleinated poly[styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA) triblock copolymer and PS. The effects of the use levels of SEBS‐g‐MA on the flame retardancy of HIPS/elastomer/MH based on unmodified and PS‐modified surface were investigated by TEM, FTIR, and combustion tests (horizontal burning test and cone calorimetry). The combustion results showed that comparing composites containing unmodified MH, the flame retarding properties of composites containing PS‐modified MH were obviously improved. The increased performance can be explained that the PS covered on the surface of MH could further improve dispersion of the filler in matrix. Furthermore, there existed a critical thickness of interfacial boundary for optimum flame‐retarding properties in both ternary composites based MH and PS‐modified MH. When the interfacial boundary relative thickness is less than 0.53, the introduction of SEBS‐g‐MA can improve the dispersion degree, leading the improvement of flame retardancy properties. However, with the increase of interfacial boundary thickness, the SEBS‐g‐MA coating around MH acted as a heat and mass transfer barrier, leading to the reduction of flame retardancy. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effects of compatibilizers and testing speeds on the mechanical properties of organophilic montmorillonite filled polyamide 6/polypropylene nanocomposites

In the present study, the fracture properties of different types of organophilic montmorillonite (OMMT) filled polyamide 6/polypropylene nanocomposites was investigated. Two types of compatibilizers, i.e., maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MA) and maleic anhydride grafted styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) were used to compatibilize these systems. The tensile properties were studied through tensile test at two different testing speeds; 50 and 500 mm/min whereas the fracture properties were determined using single‐edge‐notch‐3 point‐bending (SEN‐3PB) specimens at three different testing speeds; 1, 100, and 500 mm/min. The presence of both PP‐g‐MA and SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilizers improved the tensile and fracture properties of nanocomposites due to the compatibilizing effect of both compatibilizers. SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilizer seemed to be more effective in improving the fracture toughness of nanocomposites than PP‐g‐MA especially at high testing speed. This was due to the elastomeric nature of SEBS‐g‐MA, which can provide a better toughening effect than the relatively harder PP‐g‐MA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 50:1493–1504, 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Influence of silica nanoparticles functionalized with poly(butyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate)‐g‐diaminodiphenyl sulfone on the mechanical and thermal properties of bismaleimide nanocomposites

The silica nanoparticles functionalized with poly(butyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate)‐g‐diaminodiphenyl sulfone (P(BA‐co‐GMA)‐g‐DDS)) were prepared via atom transfer radical polymerization and ring open reaction, and characterized by Fourier transform infrared and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Subsequently, the influence of SiO₂ content on the mechanical and thermal properties for the bismaleimide (BMI) resin nanocomposites modified with pristine SiO₂ and SiO₂‐P(BA‐co‐GMA)‐g‐DDS) was investigated. It was found that SiO₂‐P(BA‐co‐GMA)‐g‐DDS) was more effective as a modifier than pristine SiO₂. The most significant improvement of the impact strength (+108.7%) and flexural strength (+64.5%) was obtained with SiO₂‐P(BA‐co‐GMA)‐g‐DDS) at 0.5 wt% content. Moreover, the thermal properties of nanocomposites were distinctly improved with the addition of functionalized SiO₂. The reasons for these changes were discussed in this article. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:2154–2159, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Tough polyamide 6/core–shell blends prepared via in situ anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam by reactive extrusion

In this study, the molten ε‐caprolactam (CL) solution of maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polystyrene (PS) containing catalyst and activator were introduced into a twin screw extruder, and polyamide 6 (PA6)/SEBS/PS blends were successfully prepared via anionic polymerization of CL by reactive extrusion. The mechanical properties measurements indicated that both the elongation at break and notched Izod impact strength of PA6/SEBS/PS (85/10/5) blends were improved distinctly with slight loss of tensile and flexural strength as compared to that of pure PA6. The images of transmission electron microscopy showed that a core–shell structure with PS core and poly (ethene‐co‐1‐butene) (PEB) shell was formed within the PA6 matrix. Fourier transform infrared was used to investigate the formation mechanisms of the core–shell structure. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2705–2710, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on the morphology and mechanical and thermal properties of polystyrene/polyamide 1212 blends

Polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 1212 (PA 1212) blends were compatibilized with a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA was beneficial to the dispersion of PA 1212 in the PS matrix because of the reaction between them. The variation of the fraction of SEBS‐g‐MA in the blends allowed the manipulation of the phase structure, which first formed a sheetlike structure and then formed a cocontinuous phase containing PA 1212/SEBS‐g‐MA core–shell morphologies. As a result, the mechanical properties, especially the Charpy notched impact resistance, were significantly improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data indicated that the strong interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PA 1212 in the blends retarded the crystallization of PA 1212. The heat distortion temperature of the compatibilized blends was improved in comparison with that of the unmodified blend, probably because of the apparent increase in the glass‐transition temperature with an increasing concentration of SEBS‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 1354–1360, 2005     

Effect of clay type and polymer matrix on microstructure and tensile properties of PLA/LLDPE/clay nanocomposites

Polylactide (PLA)/linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE), (PLA/LLDPE), blends and nanocomposites were prepared by melt mixing process with a view to fine tune the properties. Two different commercial‐grade nanoclays, Cloisite® 30B (30B) and Cloisite® 15A (15A) were used. A terpolymer of ethylene, butylacrylate (BA) and glycidylmethacrylate (GMA) was used as a reactive compatibilizer. The influence of type of clay on the morphology and mechanical properties of two PLA‐rich and LLDPE‐rich blend systems was studied. Morphological analysis using X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy revealed that the organoclay layers were dispersed largely at the interface of PLA/LLDPE. Decreasing the PLA content changed the morphology from droplet‐in matrix to coarse co‐continuous. In comparison with 30B, due to less affinity of 15A towards compatibilizer and PLA phase, the reduction of the size of dispersed phase was less than that of the equivalent 30B composites. The mechanical results demonstrated that the composites containing both types of organoclay exhibited higher modulus but lower elongation and tensile strength as compared to the neat blends. The injection molded nanocomposites were shown to have the sequential fracture behavior during tensile test. The tensile testing results on the neat blends and nanocomposites showed significant increase in elongation at break and decrease in the modulus as compared with the neat PLA. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 749‐758, 2013     

Polymericaly modified clays to preparation of polystyrene nanocomposite by nitroxide mediated radical polymerization and solution blending methods

Polymericaly modified clays that contain an oligomeric poly(styrene‐co‐chloromethyl styrene) ammonium salt have been prepared and used to preparation of polystyrene (PS) nanocomposites. First, PS and poly(styrene‐co‐chloromethyl styrene) [P(St‐co‐CMSt)] were synthesized by nitroxide mediated living free radical polymerization (NMRP) by TEMPO iniferter .Then the copolymer was coupled with N, N‐dimethyl hexadecyl amine to prepare polymeric modifier by anion exchange of chlorine group of chloromethyl styrene (CMSt) by quaternary amine. The synthesized polymeric modifier was mixed with nanoparticle of silica to change the property of clay surface from hydrophilic to hydrophobic via cation exchange of Na⁺ with alkylammonium ions. For synthesizing of nanocomposites, we used polymericaly modified montmorillonite and PS that was synthesized by NMRP technique. Intercalated nanocomposites and in some cases, exfoliated or mixed intercalated/exfoliated nanocomposites of all of these polymers have been produced by solution blending method. The prepared materials were characterized by X‐ray diffraction, Transmission electron microscopy, Fourier‐transform infrared, ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance, and gel permeation chromatography techniques. Effect of layered silicates on thermal properties and glass transition temperature of PS was investigated using TGA and DSC techniques. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:1127–1134, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers