共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Given a “black box” function to evaluate an unknown rational polynomial
f ? \mathbbQ[x]f \in {\mathbb{Q}}[x] at points modulo a prime p, we exhibit algorithms to compute the representation of the polynomial in the sparsest shifted power basis. That is, we determine
the sparsity $t \in {\mathbb{Z}}_{>0}$t \in {\mathbb{Z}}_{>0}, the shift
a ? \mathbbQ\alpha \in {\mathbb{Q}}, the exponents 0 £ e1 < e2 < ? < et{0 \leq e_{1} < e_{2} < \cdots < e_{t}}, and the coefficients
c1, ?, ct ? \mathbbQ \{0}c_{1}, \ldots , c_{t} \in {\mathbb{Q}} \setminus \{0\} such that
f(x) = c1(x-a)e1+c2(x-a)e2+ ?+ct(x-a)etf(x) = c_{1}(x-\alpha)^{e_{1}}+c_{2}(x-\alpha)^{e_{2}}+ \cdots +c_{t}(x-\alpha)^{e_{t}} 相似文献
2.
Alastair A. Abbott 《Natural computing》2012,11(1):3-11
The Deutsch–Jozsa problem is one of the most basic ways to demonstrate the power of quantum computation. Consider a Boolean
function f : {0, 1}
n
→ {0, 1} and suppose we have a black-box to compute f. The Deutsch–Jozsa problem is to determine if f is constant (i.e. f(x) = const, "x ? {0,1}nf(x) = \hbox {const, } \forall x \in \{0,1\}^n) or if f is balanced (i.e. f(x) = 0 for exactly half the possible input strings x ? {0,1}nx \in \{0,1\}^n) using as few calls to the black-box computing f as is possible, assuming f is guaranteed to be constant or balanced. Classically it appears that this requires at least 2
n−1 + 1 black-box calls in the worst case, but the well known quantum solution solves the problem with probability one in exactly
one black-box call. It has been found that in some cases the algorithm can be de-quantised into an equivalent classical, deterministic
solution. We explore the ability to extend this de-quantisation to further cases, and examine with more detail when de-quantisation
is possible, both with respect to the Deutsch–Jozsa problem, as well as in more general cases. 相似文献
3.
Complexity of Hard-Core Set Proofs 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
We study a fundamental result of Impagliazzo (FOCS’95) known as the hard-core set lemma. Consider any function f:{0,1}n?{0,1}{f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}} which is “mildly hard”, in the sense that any circuit of size s must disagree with f on at least a δ fraction of inputs. Then, the hard-core set lemma says that f must have a hard-core set H of density δ on which it is “extremely hard”, in the sense that any circuit of size
s¢=O(s/(\frac1e2log(\frac1ed))){s'=O(s/(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2}\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon\delta})))} must disagree with f on at least (1-e)/2{(1-\epsilon)/2} fraction of inputs from H. 相似文献
4.
We prove that the concept class of disjunctions cannot be pointwise approximated by linear combinations of any small set of
arbitrary real-valued functions. That is, suppose that there exist functions f1, ?, fr\phi_{1}, \ldots , \phi_{r} : {− 1, 1}n →
\mathbbR{\mathbb{R}} with the property that every disjunction f on n variables has $\|f - \sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r} \alpha_{i}\phi
_{i}\|_{\infty}\leq 1/3$\|f - \sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{r} \alpha_{i}\phi
_{i}\|_{\infty}\leq 1/3 for some reals a1, ?, ar\alpha_{1}, \ldots , \alpha_{r}. We prove that then $r \geq
exp \{\Omega(\sqrt{n})\}$r \geq
exp \{\Omega(\sqrt{n})\}, which is tight. We prove an incomparable lower bound for the concept class of decision lists. For the concept class of majority
functions, we obtain a lower bound of W(2n/n)\Omega(2^{n}/n) , which almost meets the trivial upper bound of 2n for any concept class. These lower bounds substantially strengthen and generalize the polynomial approximation lower bounds of Paturi
(1992) and show that the regression-based agnostic learning algorithm of Kalai et al. (2005) is optimal. 相似文献
5.
Halfspace Matrices 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Alexander A. Sherstov 《Computational Complexity》2008,17(2):149-178
6.
V. R. Fatalov 《Problems of Information Transmission》2010,46(1):62-85
Let w(t) be a standard Wiener process, w(0) = 0, and let η
a
(t) = w(t + a) − w(t), t ≥ 0, be increments of the Wiener process, a > 0. Let Z
a
(t), t ∈ [0, 2a], be a zeromean Gaussian stationary a.s. continuous process with a covariance function of the form E
Z
a
(t)Z
a
(s) = 1/2[a − |t − s|], t, s ∈ [0, 2a]. For 0 < p < ∞, we prove results on sharp asymptotics as ɛ → 0 of the probabilities
|
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏 |
Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司 京ICP备09084417号 |