Simplified Method for Calculating Lateral Distribution Factors for Live Load Shear

The simplified equal distribution factor (EDF) method for live load shear presented in this study originates from Henry’s method, a method that has been used in Tennessee for nearly forty years. Henry’s method allows for equal distribution of live load effects in all beams. This study focused on a careful examination and modification of Henry’s method by comparing shear distribution factors obtained from Henry’s method with those from finite element analysis and other code-specified methods for actual bridges. Twenty-four Tennessee bridges with six different types of superstructures were used in the study. The effects of structural parameters on the shear distribution factors were also studied. Modification factors to Henry’s method were proposed based on the comparison study. The proposed modification factors include structure type factors that are applied to different types of superstructures and a skew correction factor that is used to account for the effects of skew angle for skewed bridges. With proper modifications, the simplified EDF method can produce very reasonable and reliable distribution factors for live load shear.     

Live Load Radial Moment Distribution for Horizontally Curved Bridges

The present study is designed to determine the effect of major parameters on maximum total bending moments of curved girders, establish the relationship between key parameters and girder distribution factors (GDFs), and develop new approximate distribution factor equations. A level of analysis study using three numerical models was performed to establish an appropriate numerical modeling method on the basis of field test results. A total of 81 two-traffic lane curved bridges were analyzed under HL-93 loading. Two approximate GDF equations were developed based on the data obtained in this study: (1) a single GDF based on total girder normal stress; and (2) a combined GDF treating bending and warping normal stress separately. The two equations were developed based on both an averaged coefficient method and regression analysis. A goodness-of-fit test revealed that the combined GDF model developed by regression analysis best predicted GDFs. The present study demonstrated that radius, span length, cross frame spacing and girder spacing most significantly affect GDFs. The proposed GDF equations are expected to provide a more refined live load analysis for preliminary design.     

Effect of Skewness on the Distribution of Live Load Reaction at Piers of Skewed Continuous Bridges

This paper presents a study of the skewness effect on live load reactions at the piers of continuous bridges. Two prestressed concrete I-beam bridges and one steel I-girder bridge were selected for the study. To evaluate the skew effect, the skew angle of the bridges was varied from 0 to 60°. Live load reaction at support and shear at the beam ends of the selected bridges were determined using finite-element analysis. The comparison of the distribution factors of live load reactions and shear revealed that the distribution factor of reaction at piers was higher than that of shear at beam ends near the same support. The increase in the reaction distribution factor was more significant than that in the shear distribution factor in the interior beam line when the skew angle was greater than 30°. The LRFD shear equations and the Lever rule method could conservatively predict live load reaction distribution for piers in exterior beam lines but underestimate live load reaction distribution in interior beam lines. It is recommended that more research be performed for the distribution factor of live load reaction to quantify the responses.     

Load Configuration and Lateral Distribution of NATO Wheeled Military Trucks for Steel I-Girder Bridges

This paper presents the lateral load distribution of various North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) wheeled military trucks on a simple-span steel I-girder bridge (L = 36?m). The military trucks are classified into the military load classification (MLC) system. The MLC trucks demonstrate different load configurations when compared to the standard HS20 truck in terms of wheel-line spacing, number of axles, and weight. A calibrated three-dimensional finite-element analysis is conducted to examine the MLC load effects. The applicability of the AASHTO LRFD provisions is evaluated using 72 different load models. The wheel-line spacing and weight of the MLC trucks cause different flexural behavior and load distributions of the bridge when compared to those of HS20. The current AASHTO LRFD approach to determine live load distribution factors may be reasonably applicable to the MLC trucks, including approximately 20% of conservative predictions.     

Lateral Load Distribution in Curved Steel I-Girder Bridges

The purpose of this paper is to develop new formulas for live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The formulas are developed by utilizing computer model results for a number of different horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges. The bridges used in this study are modeled as generalized grillage beam systems composed of horizontally curved beam elements for steel girders and substructure elements for lateral wind bracing and cross frames which consist of truss elements. Warping torsion is taken into consideration in the analysis. The effect of numerous parameters, including radius of curvature, girder spacing, overhang, etc., on the load distribution are studied. Key parameters affecting live load distribution are identified and simplified formulas are developed to predict positive moment, negative moment, and shear distribution for one-lane and multiple-lane loading. Comparisons of the formulas with finite element method and grillage analysis show that the proposed formulas have more accurate results than the various available American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials specifications. The formulas developed in this study will assist bridge engineers and researchers in predicting the actual live load distribution in horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges.     

Influence of Parapets and Aspect Ratio on Live-Load Distribution

Significant discrepancies in girder distribution factors have been observed between actual bridge field-testing results and AASHTO code predictions. One of the reasons for the discrepancies is that code methods fail to account for the existence of secondary members such as parapets in bridges. This research investigates the effects of parapets and bridge aspect ratio on live-load moment distribution for bridge girders. The influence on distribution factors of parapets with varying overhang lengths and of aspect ratio with varying roadway width is investigated. To study the effects of parapets and aspect ratios, 34 two-span continuous bridges with a 0° or a 45° skew angle and with varied structure parameters are analyzed using the finite element method. The distribution factors obtained from these analyses are compared with those from the AASHTO methods. The presence of parapets is shown to reduce distribution factors by as much as 36 and 13% for exterior and interior girders, respectively. The effect of parapets is slightly less for skewed bridges. Aspect ratio is shown to have very little effect on distribution factors until the ratio exceeds 1.8.     

LRFD Orthotropic Plate Model for Live Load Moment in Filled Grid Decks

Due to the orthogonal elastic properties and significant two-way bending action, orthotropic plate theory may best be used to describe the behavior of concrete filled grid bridge decks. The current AASHTO LRFD specification employs an orthotropic plate model with a single patch load to predict live load moment in concrete filled grid bridge decks, which may not be conservative. This paper presents alternative equations to predict maximum moments, based on classical orthotropic plate theory, which include multiple patch loads, both the LRFD design truck and tandem load cases, and the two most common deck orientations. The predicted moments are verified through finite-element analyses.     

Sensitivity of Live Load Distribution Factors to Vehicle Spacing

Two slab-on-girder bridge superstructures are analyzed using grillage models. Different live load placement configurations are investigated to determine the sensitivity of live load shear and moment to vehicle spacing. Results from both bridges show that the distribution factors are relatively insensitive to vehicle spacing. Therefore significant computational speedups are available when applying vehicle loads on an influence surface with a fixed spacing.     

AASHTO-LRFD Live Load Distribution for Beam-and-Slab Bridges: Limitations and Applicability

This paper presents a comparison between the live load distribution factors of simple span slab-on-girders concrete bridges based on the current AASHTO-LRFD and finite-element analysis. In this comparison, the range of applicability limits specified by the current AASHTO-LRFD is fully covered and investigated in terms of span length, slab thickness, girder spacing and longitudinal stiffness. All the AASHTO-PCI concrete girders (Types I–VI) are considered to cover the complete range of longitudinal stiffness specified in the AASHTO-LRFD. Several finite-elements linear elastic models were investigated to obtain the most accurate method to represent the bridge superstructure. The bridge deck was modeled as four-node quadrilateral shell elements, whereas the girders were modeled using two-node space frame elements. The live load used in the analysis is the vehicular load plus the standard lane load as specified by AASHTO-LRFD. The live load is positioned at the longitudinal location that produced the extreme effect, and then it is moved transversely across the bridge width in order to investigate all possibilities of one-lane, two-lane and three-lane design loads. A total of 886 bridge superstructure models were built and analyzed using the computer program SAP2000 to perform this comparison. The results of this study are presented in terms of figures to be practically useful to bridge engineers. This study showed that the AASHTO-LRFD may significantly overestimate the live load distribution factors compared to the finite-element analysis.     

Simplified AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design Girder Live Load Distribution in Illinois

Illinois began full transition to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials load and resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge design specifications from the traditional load factor design code or standard specifications in 2002. To facilitate implementation of the new specification, engineers from the Illinois Department of Transportation undertook a series of investigations. The studies focused on interpretation of LRFD for the design of typical bridges in Illinois and the simplification of its procedures for determination of live load lane distributions to primary superstructure girders. Some important presented results from the conducted investigations are believed not only relevant to bridge design in Illinois, but to other states and jurisdictions which employ or will employ LRFD in the near future. The initial simplifications and interpretations focused on concrete deck-on-steel girder bridges and were subsequently expanded to include concrete deck-on-prestressed concrete girder structures. These types of structures comprise a large portion of Illinois’ inventory. Illinois Department of Transportation engineers continue to build on the studies described in the paper such that policies and procedures for other types of typical bridges can be formulated.     

Influence of Secondary Elements and Deck Cracking on the Lateral Load Distribution of Steel Girder Bridges

The AASHTO LRFD load distribution factor equation was developed based on elastic finite element analysis considering only primary members, i.e., the effects of secondary elements such as lateral bracing and parapets were not considered. Meanwhile, many bridges have been identified as having significant cracking in the concrete deck. Even though deck cracking is a well-known phenomenon, the significance of pre-existing cracks on the live load distribution has not yet been assessed. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of secondary elements and deck cracking on the lateral load distribution of girder bridges. First, secondary elements such as diaphragms and parapets were modeled using the finite element method, and the calculated load distribution factors were compared with the code-specified values. Second, the effects of typical deck cracking and crack types that have a major effect on load distribution were identified through a number of nonlinear finite element analyses. It was established that the presence of secondary elements may produce load distribution factors up to 40% lower than the AASHTO LRFD values. Longitudinal cracking was found to increase the load distribution factor by up to 17% when compared to the LRFD value while the transverse cracking was found to not significantly influence the transverse distribution of moment.     

Live Load Distribution Formulas for Single-Span Prestressed Concrete Integral Abutment Bridge Girders

In this study, live load distribution formulas for the girders of single-span integral abutment bridges (IABs) are developed. For this purpose, two and three dimensional finite-element models (FEMs) of several IABs are built and analyzed. In the analyses, the effects of various superstructure properties such as span length, number of design lanes, prestressed concrete girder size, and spacing as well as slab thickness are considered. The results from the analyses of two and three dimensional FEMs are then used to calculate the live load distribution factors (LLDFs) for the girders of IABs as a function of the above mentioned parameters. The LLDFs for the girders are also calculated using the AASHTO formulas developed for simply supported bridges (SSBs). The comparison of the analyses results revealed that LLDFs for girder moments and exterior girder shear of IABs are generally smaller than those calculated for SSBs using AASHTO formulas especially for short spans. However, AASHTO LLDFs for interior girder shear are found to be in good agreement with those obtained for IABs. Consequently, direct live load distribution formulas and correction factors to the current AASHTO live load distribution equations are developed to estimate the girder live load moments and exterior girder live load shear for IABs with prestressed concrete girders. It is observed that the developed formulas yield a reasonably good estimate of live load effects in prestressed concrete IAB girders.     

Shear Live-Load Distribution Factors for I-Girder Bridges

A full scale, single lane test bridge was used to evaluate a typical slab-on-girder bridge’s response to shear. The results of the shear load test provided the means to evaluate the level of detail for a finite element model that is required to accurately replicate the behavior of bridges subject to shear loads. This finite element modeling scheme was then used to evaluate more than 200 finite element bridge models. The bridge models investigated the effects of girder spacing, span length, overhang distance and skew angle on the shear live-load distribution factor. The finite element shear distribution factors were compared with those calculated according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials load and resistance factor design (AASHTO LRFD) specifications. It was found that the AASHTO LRFD procedure accurately predicted the shear distribution factor for changes in girder spacing and span length. However, the LRFD shear distribution factor for the exterior girder was found to be unconservative for certain overhang distances and overly conservative for the interior girder for higher skew angles. Alternative equations are provided for the single and multilane exterior girder correction factor.     

Live-Load Distribution Factors for Prestressed Concrete, Spread Box-Girder Bridge

This study presents an evaluation of shear and moment live-load distribution factors for a new, prestressed concrete, spread box-girder bridge. The shear and moment distribution factors were measured under a live-load test using embedded fiber-optic sensors and used to verify a finite element model. The model was then loaded with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation (AASHTO) design truck. The resulting maximum girder distribution factors were compared to those calculated from both the AASHTO standard specifications and the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. The LRFD specifications predictions of girder distribution factors were accurate to conservative when compared to the finite element model for all distribution factors. The standard specifications predictions of girder distribution factors ranged from highly unconservative to highly conservative when compared to the finite element model. For the study bridge, the LRFD specifications would result in a safe design, though exterior girders would be overdesigned. The standard Specifications, however, would result in an unsafe design for interior girders and overdesigned exterior girders.     

Bridge Safety Evaluation Based on Monitored Live Load Effects

A novel approach to evaluating safety of existing bridges based on monitored structural responses and component conditions is presented in this paper. A limit state equation is developed for the measured strain data from structural health monitoring (SHM). The new concepts of the condition function, α(s,t), and prediction function, ζ(s,t), are introduced. The condition function is utilized to estimate the strains at locations other than the strain gauge locations. This function is related to the structural condition assessment results, strain gauge locations, and failure modes under consideration. The prediction function is used to predict the extreme values of the SHM data in the future. An illustration of the proposed approach is provided on an existing highway bridge in Pennsylvania, which had been monitored from 2001 to 2005 by the Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems Center, a National Engineering Research Center at Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa. This study provides the basis for integrating achievable SHM data into structural safety evaluation, and establishes a valid platform for life-cycle, cost-oriented, and reliability-based infrastructure management systems using structural health monitoring.     

Simplified Moment Redistribution of Hybrid HPS 485W Bridge Girders in Negative Bending

Simplified moment redistribution procedures based on shakedown have recently been approved by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO 2004). These procedures are currently only applicable for homogeneous girders, and thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate whether these procedures can be further applied for hybrid HPS 485W girders. A parametric study is carried out using validated three-dimensional finite-element (FE) analyses to study the inelastic behavior of hybrid HPS 485W girders in negative bending for this purpose. The effective plastic moments obtained from the FE studies are compared with those from the proposed prediction equations, where good correlation is observed. A design example of a three-span slab-on-girder bridge with hybrid HPS 485W girders using both elastic design and the simplified moment redistribution procedures is also presented, where it is shown that the use of moment redistribution procedures results in a negative bending section that is 13% lighter than the corresponding elastic design.     

Flexural Lateral Load Distribution Characteristics of Sandwich Plate System Bridges: Parametric Investigation

The sandwich plate system (SPS) is a relatively new bridge deck system that consists of steel face plates bonded to a rigid polyurethane core. The decks are thin, lightweight, and modular in design and can be tailored to numerous applications. This system provides an excellent alternative for the rapid construction and rehabilitation of bridge decks. With any new system, there exists some uncertainty in the design procedures as a result of the limited population for comparison. This paper presents the results of a finite-element parametric investigation of the lateral load distribution characteristics of SPS bridges. The parametric study primarily focuses on the influence of deck thickness on distribution behavior as compared to conventional reinforced concrete decks. Results from the study demonstrate that the inherent flexibility of a thin SPS deck yields larger distribution factors (up to 20%) than a typical reinforced concrete deck, but these distribution factors can still be conservatively estimated with current AASHTO LRFD methods. Additional comparisons indicate that the distribution behavior of SPS bridges can also be estimated with the equations proposed by the NCHRP 12-62 project.     

Load Distribution for a Highly Skewed Bridge: Testing and Analysis

The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifications provide formulas for determining live load distribution factors for bridges. For load distribution factors to be accurate, the behavior of the bridge must be understood. While the behavior of right-angle bridges and bridges with limited skews is relatively well understood, that of highly skewed bridges is not. This paper presents a study aimed at developing a better understanding of the transverse load distribution for highly skewed slab-on-steel girder bridges. The study involved both a diagnostic field test of a recently constructed bridge and an extensive numerical analysis. The bridge tested and analyzed is a two-span, continuous, slab-on-steel composite highway bridge with a skew angle of 60°. The bridge behavior is defined based on the field test data. Finite-element analyses of the bridge were conducted to investigate the influence of model mesh, transverse stiffness, diaphragms, and modeling of the supports. The resulting test and analytical results are compared with AASHTO’s Load and Resistance Factor Design formulas for live load distribution to assess the accuracy of the current empirical formulas.     

Parapet Strength and Contribution to Live-Load Response for Superload Passages

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of parapets on the live-load response of slab-on-girder steel bridges subjected to superload vehicles and the effects of these loads on the parapets. A superload is a special permit truck that exceeds the predefined weight limitation. The presence of parapets can result in reduced girder distribution factors (GDFs) for critical girders, and this reserve strength can be considered for passage of a superload truck. This reduction is investigated, as well as the effects of discontinuous parapets and the capacity of parapets. Two steel bridges with significantly different geometric proportions were analyzed to evaluate the sensitivity of the structure to the effects of parapets. It was found that the GDFs can be decreased by as much as 30%, depending on the stiffness of the girders and the transverse truck position if the parapets are included in the analysis. The axial forces and bending moments resisted by the parapets were compared with the capacity of the parapets. The parapets and their connection with the deck were found to have adequate strength to accommodate the demand imposed by the superload trucks included in the study. For the discontinuous parapets, the open joint was determined to be acting like a notch, which increases the bottom flange stresses in the positive moment region and the tensile deck stresses in the negative moment region.     

Wheel Load Distribution in Simply Supported Concrete Slab Bridges

This paper presents the results of a parametric study related to the wheel load distribution in one-span, simply supported, multilane, reinforced concrete slab bridges. The finite-element method was used to investigate the effect of span length, slab width with and without shoulders, and wheel load conditions on typical bridges. A total of 112 highway bridge case studies were analyzed. It was assumed that the bridges were stand-alone structures carrying one-way traffic. The finite-element analysis (FEA) results of one-, two-, three-, and four-lane bridges are presented in combination with four typical span lengths. Bridges were loaded with highway design truck HS20 placed at critical locations in the longitudinal direction of each lane. Two possible transverse truck positions were considered: (1) Centered loading condition where design trucks are assumed to be traveling in the center of each lane; and (2) edge loading condition where the design trucks are placed close to one edge of the slab with the absolute minimum spacing between adjacent trucks. FEA results for bridges subjected to edge loading showed that the AASHTO standard specifications procedure overestimates the bending moment by 30% for one lane and a span length less than 7.5 m (25 ft) but agrees with FEA bending moments for longer spans. The AASHTO bending moment gave results similar to those of the FEA when considering two or more lanes and a span length less than 10.5 m (35 ft). However, as the span length increases, AASHTO underestimates the FEA bending moment by 15 to 30%. It was shown that the presence of shoulders on both sides of the bridge increases the load-carrying capacity of the bridge due to the increase in slab width. An extreme loading scenario was created by introducing a disabled truck near the edge in addition to design trucks in other lanes placed as close as possible to the disabled truck. For this extreme loading condition, AASHTO procedure gave similar results to the FEA longitudinal bending moments for spans up to 7.5 m (25 ft) and underestimated the FEA (20 to 40%) for spans between 9 and 16.5 m (30 and 55 ft), regardless of the number of lanes. The new AASHTO load and resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge design specifications overestimate the bending moments for normal traffic on bridges. However, LRFD procedure gives results similar to those of the FEA edge+truck loading condition. Furthermore, the FEA results showed that edge beams must be considered in multilane slab bridges with a span length ranging between 6 and 16.5 m (20 and 55 ft). This paper will assist bridge engineers in performing realistic designs of simply supported, multilane, reinforced concrete slab bridges as well as evaluating the load-carrying capacity of existing highway bridges.