Comparison of intradialytic blood pressure variability between conventional thrice‐weekly hemodialysis and short daily hemodialysis

Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) variability may be associated with increased mortality. We examined the effect of short daily hemodialysis (SDHD) on intradialytic BP variability relative to conventional thrice‐weekly HD (CHD). This is a retrospective cohort study. Subjects were those converted from CHD to SDHD (n=12). All intradialytic BPs were collected on the last month of CHD, and on month 6 of SDHD. Absolute predialysis BP level and intradialytic BP variability were defined as the intercept and average residual terms, respectively, from a mixed‐effects linear regression model of time on BP. Dialysis modality was a predictor variable (CHD vs. SDHD). Outcome variables were intradialytic BP variability and hypotension (BP<90/55 mmHg at any time during HD). In addition to a predictor and outcomes, the demographics, estimated dry weight, and ultrafiltration ratio were examined. The median (range) age of the patients was 48 (34–77); all had hypertension, and 4 (33%) had diabetes. By a mixed effects linear regression model, the intradialytic systolic BP variability was 13.2 (quartile range 9.5–14.0) mmHg and 10.0 (8.3–10.9) mmHg for CHD and SDHD, respectively (P<0.006). Intradialytic diastolic BP variability was also significantly reduced (7.7 [6.4–9.2] vs. 6.1 [5.5–6.6] mmHg, P=0.005). Relative to CHD, less hypotension was observed during treatment on SDHD: the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.36 (0.16–0.81; P=0.008). In this retrospective study, SDHD was associated with less intradialytic BP variability and with fewer episodes of hypotension during treatments. Further studies are necessary to generalize these findings.     

Clinical praxis for assessment of dry weight in Sweden and Denmark: A mixed‐methods study

Overhydration is an independent predictor of mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. More than 30% of HD patients are overhydrated, motivating the development of new methods for assessing hydration status. This study surveyed clinical praxis and local guidelines for dry weight (DW) assessment in Swedish and Danish HD units, and examined if differences in routines and utilization of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and other assistive technology affected frequency of DW adjustments and blood pressure (BP) levels. Cross‐sectional information on praxis, guidelines and routines, plus treatment‐related data from 99 stratified patients were collected. Qualitative data were analyzed with content analysis and interpreted in convergence with statistical analysis of quantitative data in a mixed‐methods design. Local guidelines concerning DW existed in 54% of the units. A BIS device was present in 52%, but only half of those units used it regularly, and no correlations to frequency of DW adjustments or BP were found. HD nurses were authorized to adjust DW in 60% of the units; in these units, the frequency of DW adjustments was 1.6 times higher and systolic BP pre‐HD 8 mmHg lower. There is a wide variation in routines for DW determination, and there are indications that authorization of HD nurses to adjust DW may improve DW assessment. BIS is sparsely used; its implementation may have been delayed by uncertainty over how to manage the device and interpret measurements. Hence, better methods and guidelines for assessing DW and using BIS need to be developed.     

Pre‐ and Post Hemodialysis Procalcitonin Levels and Their Relationships with Immunoregulatory,Proinflammatory Cytokines in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

Arteriosclerosis is characterized by stiffening of arteries. The incremental elastic modulus (Einc) measurement is a good marker of arterial wall stiffness. Arteriosclerosis is characterized by stiffening of arteries. Metabolic, inflammatory, and hemodynamic alterations cause structural changes and vascular complications in end‐stage renal disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factors that may affect the development of arteriosclerosis by measurement of Einc in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thirty‐two patients (16 men and 16 women) on chronic HD with a mean age of 42.2 ± 19.3 (range, 15–80) were included in the study. The carotid Einc was measured to determine arteriosclerosis by high‐resolution echo‐tracking system. Einc measurement was calculated from transcutaneous measurements of carotid arterial internal diameter and wall thickness and carotid pulse pressure. Common carotid compliance (CCC) and distensibility (CCD) were determined from changes in carotid artery diameter during systole and simultaneously measured carotid pulse pressure. Serum levels of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), parathormone (PTH), ferritin, C‐reactive protein (CRP), predialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP), predialysis diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), age, HD duration, CCC, and CCD were correlated with Einc in all patients. A significant positive correlation was found between Einc and age (r = 0.40, p < 0.02), SBP (r = 0.39, p < 0.02), PP (r = 0.40, p < 0.02), Ca (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), CRP (r = 0.38, p < 0.02). As expected, Einc was correlated inversely with CCD (r = ?0.77, p < 0.0001). The correlation between Einc and HD duration, DBP, ferritin, P, PTH, and CCC was not significant. In conclusion, the stiffening of carotid artery in HD patients is related not only to hemodynamic changes (increased SBP and PP) but also to metabolic (increased Ca) and inflammatory (increased CRP) responses. Carotid Einc is an accepted independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Because of the positive correlation between Einc and serum Ca, vitamin D and Ca‐containing P binder should be used carefully in HD patients.     

Monocyte/lymphocyte ratio as a better predictor of cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality in hemodialysis patients: A prospective cohort study

Introduction: Patients with chronic kidney disease, especially those with end‐stage renal disease, have an increased risk of death. Previous studies have suggested neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was related to worse outcome in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) has not been evaluated in HD patients. In this study, we prospectively studied the predictive value of MLR for all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality in HD patients and compared it with NLR. Methods: Patients who had been on a HD treatment for at least 6 months were enrolled. MLR was calculated by dividing the monocyte count by the lymphocyte count. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared by the log‐rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of MLR and other clinical factors on all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Mortality rates for the lowest, middle, and highest MLR tertile group were 3.65, 7.02, and 11.15, respectively per 100 patient‐years. The Kaplan‐Meier analysis revealed that survival rates were significantly different among three MLR groups (P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, MLR was independently associated with all‐cause mortality (HR 4.842; 95% CI, 2.091–11.214; P < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 6.985, 95% CI 1.943–25.115, P = 0.003) as continuous variables. NLR was not an independent predictor of all‐cause nor cardiovascular mortality after adjusted with MLR. Conclusions: The main finding of the study suggest that higher MLR was a strong and independent predictor of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality and overwhelmed NLR among HD patients.     

Death in dialysis

Purpose:  To analyze all patients who died while on hemodialysis from a single institution 1995–2004 and determine factors that influence duration on HD (months). Material and Methods: Review of the EMR from the dialysis unit for demographics, treatment parameters, cause of death, laboratory data. Two main groups those who stop dialysis (SHD) vs non stop dialysis (NSHD) data as mean and SD. Observations done at the start/mid/end of the period on dialysis by Kaplan Meier analysis. Results:  348 deaths, reported SMR for 2000–93(0.36,0.48,0.72,0.79), average comorbidity index 7.1–16.4; 49.1% male; age 67.6(12.3); 58.2% DM, 117(33.6%) stop dialysis. Detail analysis from 2000–2004; 187 deaths; 33.6% catheter, 41.1% AV graft at the time of death; 26% on no BP meds at the end, 64% 1–2 BP meds at the end.  

     

Extracellular Volume Changes and Blood Pressure Levels in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Despite the use of highly efficient antihypertensive drugs (AHD), blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled in the vast majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many of them show no reduction in nocturnal BP, a finding that is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the removal of a fluid overload on BP by monitoring the ambulatory BP during 48 hours in 16 hypertensive HD patients treated with AHD. Our aim was to obtain a gradual reduction in post‐HD body weight (BW) over a period of 3 to 4 months. Methods: During a period of 3–4 months, the postdialysis BW was reduced as the minimal tolerable BW was gradually achieved by slightly increasing the ultrafiltration volume. The Na concentration in the dialysate was reduced from 143–141 mmol/L to 139–138 mmol/L. Extracellular volume (ECV) was measured with a multiple‐frequency bioimpedance analyzer (Xitron 4000B, Xitron Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Based on the change in ECV, the patients were subdivided into two groups: group 1 with a reduction in ECV (n = 10), and group 2 with no reduction (n = 6). At the start of the study, BW, BP, and AHD in group 1 and group 2 were virtually identical. Results: Group 1 showed a significant reduction during the entire 48‐hour period in systolic (156 ± 16 mmHg vs. 140 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.030) and diastolic BP (97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 87 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.026) as well as in mean arterial pressure (MAP, 117 ± 13 vs. 105 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.027). This reduction was more marked during the night (systolic BP 156 ± 15 mmHg vs. 138 ± 14 mmHg, P = 0.007; diastolic BP 97 ± 12 mmHg vs. 85 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.009) than during the day (157 ± 18 mmHg vs. 142 ± 15 mmHg, P = 0.067; diastolic BP 97 ± 13 mmHg vs. 90 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.126). A significant reduction in systolic load also occurred during the entire 48‐hour period (76 ± 24% vs. 46 ± 28%, P = 0.043) as well as in night systolic load (75 ± 21% vs. 41 ± 30%, P = 0.015) and night diastolic load (67 ± 32% vs. 39 ± 31%, P = 0.030). AHD were stopped in eight and reduced in two patients. There were no significant reductions in BP and AHD in group 2. Conclusions: The removal of excess fluid is necessary for adequate BP control and especially for the reduction in elevated BP during the night.     

A study of the extracorporeal rate of blood flow and blood pressure during hemodialysis

Hemodynamic instability is a common problem during hemodialysis (HD). The effect of blood flow rate (BFR) on blood pressure (BP) during HD has not been previously evaluated. Subjects receiving HD for the treatment of renal failure were enrolled (n=34). For each patient, during the last hour of 2 consecutive HD sessions the BFR was set at 200 mL/min for 30 min and at 400 mL/min for 30 min, during which period the fluid removal rate was kept constant. The order of the BFR alterations was randomized. The study procedure was repeated during the next HD session but with reversal of the order of the altered BFR. During each 30-min period, BP was recorded at baseline and subsequently every 10 min. During the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher systolic BP by an average of 4.1 mmHg compared with the BFR of 200 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-7.98; p=0.038). Similarly, during the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher diastolic BP by an average of 3.04 mmHg compared with the BFR of 200 mL/min (95% CI 0.55-5.53; p=0.017). Likewise, during the BFR of 400 mL/min, subjects had a higher mean arterial pressure by an average of 3.44 mmHg (95% CI 0.77-6.11; p=0.012). The findings suggest that during HD, BPs are maintained higher at higher BFRs as compared with lower BFRs.     

Left ventricular mass index and aortic arch calcification score are independent mortality predictors of maintenance hemodialysis patients

To analyze predictive factors for all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, nonfatal CV events (CVE) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, and to compare the effects of standard hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (HDF) on these factors and outcomes. A total of 333 MHD patients were prospectively followed up for 50 ± 15 months and all‐cause death, CV death and CVE were registered. At the baseline, demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the whole population were recorded. Then, patients were stratified into two groups according to the dialysis modalities, HD (n = 268) and HDF (n = 65). At the end of 6th month, clinical and laboratory data were recorded again. The predictive factors at baseline for all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE were analyzed by Cox regression. The effects of HD and HDF on these factors at the 6th month and long‐term outcomes were compared by t‐test and Kaplan–Meier method, respectively. Age, gender, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), aortic arch calcification score (AoACS), hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL, and ferritin >500 ng/mL maintained independent associations with all‐cause mortality. C‐reactive protein (CRP), LVMI, AoACS, and Hb <10 g/dL were associated with CV mortality. Prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), AoACS and LVMI were independent predictors of nonfatal CVE. Higher body mass index (BMI), body weight, total serum cholesterol, Hb concentration, and lower CRP level, LVMI, and AoACS were found in patients on HDF at the end of the 6th month. Improved outcomes with longer survival time for all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE were found in HDF group. Age, gender, LVMI, AoACS, Hb, and ferritin were predictors of all‐cause mortality in MHD patients. CRP, LVMI, AoACS, and Hb were associated with CV mortality. Prior CVD, AoACS, and LVMI were independent predictors of nonfatal CVE. HDF could improve BMI, body weight, total serum cholesterol, Hb, CRP, LVMI, AoACS, and long‐term outcomes, including all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE.     

The Clinical Impact of Increasing the Hemodialysis Dose

Good evidence suggests that improvements in dialysis efficiency reduce morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Dialysis efficiency has also been related to better control of arterial blood pressure (BP), anemia, and serum phosphorus levels, and to improvement in patients' nutritional status. Over a 2‐year period, the present self‐controlled study of 34 HD patients (23 men, 11 women; age, 52.6 ± 14.5 years; HD duration, 55.9 ± 61.2 months) looked at the effect on clinical and laboratory parameters of increasing the delivered dialysis dose under a strict dry‐weight policy. Dialysis dose was increased without increasing dialysis time and frequency. A statistically significant increase was seen in delivered HD dose: the urea reduction ratio (URR) increased to 60% ± 10% from 52% ± 8%, and then to 71% ± 7% (p < 0.001); Kt/V_urea increased to 1.22 ± 0.28 from 0.93 ± 0.19, and then to 1.55 ± 0.29 (p < 0.001). A statistically significant increase in hemoglobin concentration also occurred—to 10.8 ± 1.9 g/dL from 10.4 ± 1.7 g/dL, and then to 11.0 ± 1.3 g/dL (p < 0.05 as compared to baseline)—with no significant difference in weekly erythropoietin dose. Statistically significant decreases occurred in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures during the first year; they then remained unchanged. Systolic blood pressure decreased to 131 ± 23 mmHg from 147 ± 24 mmHg (p < 0.001); diastolic blood pressure decreased to 65 ± 11 mmHg from 73 ± 12 mmHg (p < 0.001). Serum albumin increased insignificantly to 4.4 ± 0.4 g/dL from 4.3 ± 0.4 g/dL, and then significantly to 4.6 ± 0.3 g/dL (p = 0.002 as compared to both previous values). Normalized protein catabolic rate increased significantly to 1.16 ± 0.15 g/kg/day from 0.93 ± 0.16 g/kg/ day (p < 0.001), and then to 1.20 ± 0.17 g/kg/day (p < 0.001 as compared to baseline). We conclude that the increases achieved in average Kt/V_urea per hemodialysis session by increasing dialyzer membrane area, and blood and dialysate flows, without increasing dialysis time above 4 hours, in patients hemodialyzed thrice weekly, coupled with strict dry‐weight policy, resulted in improvements in hypertension, nutritional status, and anemia.     

Intensive dialysis and blood pressure control: A review

The prevalence of hypertension in hemodialysis (HD) patients has increased over the years. In the early days of maintenance HD blood pressure (BP) control was achieved in most patients. As sessions were shortened, the prevalence of hypertension increased. Yet, in principle, dialysis is able to control hypertension. Today, in programs using long HD, most patients are normotensive without antihypertensive medication. The same is true for patients on daily dialysis, but not for those on short thrice‐weekly HD. In all studies reporting BP normalization, dry weight is regularly achieved. Why the poor control of hypertension now? At first sight the shortened session duration is the culprit. This is suggested by several epidemiologic observations and strongly supported by a prospective experience of changing the HD schedule (short to long HD or conversely) in the same group of patients. Recent studies, however, using strict volume control show that BP normalization can be obtained in conventional 3 x 4 hr/week dialysis with relatively low delivered Kt/V_urea. Therefore, prolonging the dialysis time and/or increasing the dialysis dose are not required to achieve BP control. Intensive dialysis most probably normalizes BP by getting the extracellular volume and the amount of sodium in the body back to normal. It acts in conjunction with a moderate dietary sodium restriction and the use of reasonably low dialysate sodium. With this approach improved BP control can be achieved in the vast majority of HD patients.     

The relationship between symptoms and blood pressure during maintenance hemodialysis

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a detrimental complication of maintenance hemodialysis, but how it is defined and reported varies widely in the literature. European Best Practice Guideline and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines require symptoms and a mitigating intervention to fulfill the diagnosis, but morbidity and mortality outcomes are largely based on blood pressure alone. Furthermore, little is known about the incidence of asymptomatic hypotension, which may be an important cause of hypoperfusion injury and impaired outcome. Seventy‐seven patients were studied over 456 dialysis sessions. Blood pressure was measured at 15‐minute intervals throughout the session and compared with post‐dialysis symptom questionnaire results using mixed modeling to adjust for repeated measures in the same patient. The frequency of asymptomatic hypotension was estimated by logistic regression using a variety of commonly cited blood pressure metrics that describe IDH. In 113 sessions (25%) where symptoms were recorded on the questionnaire, these appear not to have been reported to dialysis staff. When symptoms were reported (293 sessions [64%]), an intervention invariably followed. Dizziness and cramp were strongly associated with changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), but not diastolic blood pressure. Nausea occurred more frequently in younger patients but was not associated with falls in blood pressure. Thresholds that maximized the probability of an intervention rather than a session remaining asymptomatic were SBP <100 mmHg or a 20% reduction in SBP from baseline. The probability of SBP falling to <100 mmHg in an asymptomatic session was 0.23. Symptoms are frequently not reported by patients who are hypotensive during hemodialysis, which leads to an underestimation of IDH if symptom‐based definitions are used. A revised definition of IDH excluding patient‐reported symptoms would be in line with literature reporting morbidity and mortality outcomes and include sessions in which potentially detrimental asymptomatic hypotension occurs.     

Inverse association between docosahexaenoic acid and mortality in patients on hemodialysis during over 10 years

We have previously conducted a cohort study to investigate n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in red blood cells (RBCs) and risk of all‐cause mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients over 5 years and found that n‐3 PUFAs, especially docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), might be an independent predictor of all‐cause mortality. In the present study, we extended the study for another 5 years to determine whether DHA levels in RBCs still predict the mortality of HD patients during a 10‐year study period. The study cohort consisted of 176 patients (64.1 ± 12.0 [mean ± standard deviation] years of age, 96 men and 80 women) under HD treatment. The fatty acid composition of patients' RBCs was analyzed by gas chromatography. During the study period of 10 years, 97 deaths occurred. After adjustment for 10 confounding factors, the hazard ratio of all‐cause mortality of the HD patients in the highest DHA tertile (>8.1%) was 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.30–0.91) compared with those in the lowest DHA tertile (<7.2%). However, other n‐3 PUFAs such as eicosapentaenoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid (n‐3) did not reveal any significant correlations. The level of DHA in RBCs could be an independent predictor of all‐cause mortality in HD patients even during a long period of follow‐up.     

Pulmonary hypertension in patients on chronic hemodialysis and with heart failure

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is linked to chronic kidney disease. However, few studies have examined the prevalence, risk factors, or outcomes of PH in patients with chronic hemodialysis and concomitant heart failure. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 160 patients with a history of acute decompensated heart failure after maintenance hemodialysis therapy. All patients were prospectively observed until December 2013 or death. PH was defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mmHg, as determined through echocardiography. Fifty‐one (32%) patients had PH, more of whom were female (70% vs. 52%, P = 0.04). The patients with PH had a lower body mass index (21.8 vs. 23.0, P = 0.03), higher cardiothoracic ratio (55% vs. 52%, P = 0.006), larger left atrium (38.5 vs. 35.7 mm, P = 0.01), and an increased proportion of mitral regurgitation (MR) (73% vs. 38%, P < 0.001) compared with the patients who did not have PH. In the multivariate regression analysis, MR was associated most strongly with PH (odds ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–8.43, P = 0.001). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, PH was related independently to all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.53–6.31; P = 0.002) and combined cardiovascular events (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.66–4.44; P < 0.001) after the model was adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors. PH is related to MR and independently associated with increased all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic hemodialysis and heart failure.     

Categorization of the hemodynamic response to hemodialysis: The importance of baroreflex sensitivity

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The baroreflex arc is under autonomic control and regulates blood pressure. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of impaired baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) to the pathophysiology of IDH. Thirty-four chronic HD (12 IDH-prone, 22 IDH-resistant) patients underwent BRS measurement during HD with relative blood volume monitoring. During analysis, patients were separated into four age-matched groups according to resting BRS≥4.5 ms/mmHg and hemodynamic stability. Resting BRS was extremely heterogenous (geometric mean BRS 5.78±1.41 [range 1.76–41.41] ms/mmHg). Relative blood volume reduction was well matched in all groups (mean reduction in relative blood volume for all patients −6.74%±0.86%, P>0.05). Thirty-seven episodes of IDH occurred in the IDH prone, reduced BRS group. Patients with impaired resting BRS and prone to IDH had markedly different responses to HD as compared to the preserved BRS group, but the total peripheral resistance response was significantly lower than in the IDH-resistant patients (15.9%±2.1% vs. 42.4%±3.0%, respectively, P<0.001). In those patients prone to IDH and with impaired resting BRS, percentage reduction in cardiac output at the end of HD highly correlated with reduction in relative blood volume (r=0.94, P=0.006). Hypotension during dialysis may be an important source of recurrent cardiac injury and early recognition of those patients prone to relative symptomatic and asymptomatic hypotension remains important. Impaired resting BRS and recognition of a suboptimal peripheral pressor response, appear to predict those patients most likely to undergo hemodynamic instability and may assist in the pursuit of this elusive goal.     

Prognostic significance of 25‐hydroxivitamin D entirely explained by a higher comorbidity burden: Experience from a South‐Eastern European Dialysis Cohort

Vitamin D deficiency is still a common problem particularly in the elderly and in individuals with various degrees of renal impairment. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D and death in a large cohort of prevalent patients on hemodialysis (HD) from south‐east Romania, a typical Balkan region. This is an observational prospective study that included a total of 570 patients on maintenance HD. Study patients were classified into three groups by baseline 25(OH)D levels: (1) sufficient 25(OH)D—i.e., >30 ng/mL; (2) insufficient 25(OH)D—i.e., between 10 and 29 ng/mL; and (3) deficient 25(OH)D—i.e., <10 ng/mL. During the follow‐up period of 14 months, 68 patients (11.9%) died, the Kaplan–Meier analysis showing significant differences in all‐cause mortality for chronic kidney disease patients in different 25(OH)D groups (P = 0.002). Unadjusted Cox regression analysis also showed significant differences in survival. The multivariate Cox regression model showed no significant differences in survival according to vitamin D levels. Hazard ratio for death in the “<10 ng/mL” group was 1.619 (P = 0.190) and in the “10–30 ng/mL” group was 0.837 (P = 0.609). In our dialysis population with a high comorbidity burden, low 25(OH)D concentration was not associated with mortality in the adjusted Cox model, suggesting that vitamin D deficiency could represent only a non‐specific marker for a poor health status, with less impact on mortality.     

Pruritus in hemodialysis patients: Results from the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (JDOPPS)

Pruritus affects many patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). In this study, pruritus and its relationship to morbidity, quality of life (QoL), sleep quality, and patient laboratory measures were analyzed in a large sample of Japanese patients undergoing HD. Severity of patient‐reported pruritus symptoms experienced during a 4‐week period was collected from 6480 Japanese patients undergoing HD in three phases of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS; 1996–2008; 60–65 study facilities/phase). Adjusted linear and logistic regressions were used to identify associations of pruritus with treatment parameters and QoL outcomes. Adjusted Cox regressions examined the influence of pruritus severity on mortality. Moderate to extreme pruritus was experienced by 44% of prevalent patients undergoing HD in the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Many patient characteristics were significantly associated with pruritus, but this did not explain the large differences in pruritus among facilities (20–70%). Pruritus was slightly less common in patients starting HD than in patients on dialysis >1 year. Patients with moderate to extreme pruritus were more likely to feel drained (adjusted odds ratio = 2.2–5.8, P < 0.0001), have poor sleep quality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9–3.7, P < 0.0001), and have QoL mental and physical composite scores 2.3–6.7 points lower (P < 0.0001) than patients with no/mild pruritus. Pruritus in patients undergoing HD was associated with a 23% higher mortality risk (P = 0.09). The many poor outcomes associated with pruritus underscore the need for better therapeutic agents to provide relief for the 40–50% of prevalent patients undergoing HD substantially affected by pruritus. Pruritus in new patients with end‐stage renal disease likely results from uremia or pre‐existing conditions (not HD per se), indicating the need to understand development of pruritus before end‐stage renal disease.     

Residual renal function and arterial stiffness mediated the blood pressure change during interdialytic weight gain in hemodialysis patients

Volume overload is thought to be the main cause of hypertension in dialysis patients. However, the effect of interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) in hemodialysis (HD) patients, which was considered as an increase in extracellular water (ECW), on blood pressure (BP) change, was controversial. Our aim was to examine the changes in hemodynamics and arterial stiffness during IDWG in HD patients and attempt to explore the possible mechanism of diverse BP change. Thirty prevalent patients on HD were enrolled. The height, weight, BP, blood chemistry, volume status assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis, hemodynamic parameters obtained by echocardiography, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were collected within 1 hour postdialysis and again just before the next dialysis session. Meanwhile, blood samples were drawn to analyze vasoactive hormones, including renin, angiotensin II, catecholamine, and endothelin. The patients' weights and ECWs during the next predialysis were significantly higher than those during the postdialysis. The BP showed no difference between postdialysis and the next predialysis. There was an obvious increase in cardiac output and decrease in total peripheral resistance as a whole during the next predialysis than that during postdialysis. When patients were divided into the BP increase group (BPI group, 13 patients) and BP decrease group (BPD group, 11 patients) according to the change in systolic BP higher than 10 mmHg, both groups displayed a significant increase in weight, ECW, cardiac output, and a decrease in total peripheral resistance. As compared with the BPI group, patients in the BPD group had significantly lower IDWG, shorter time on dialysis treatment, and higher residual renal function. A decrease in catecholamine and endothelin in the next predialysis was obvious in the BPD group. There was a significant decrease in PWV at the next predialysis in the BPD group while the PWV did not change significantly in the BPI group. Our results showed that the diverse BP change during IDWG was significantly affected by residual renal function, PWV, and vasoactive substances.     

Effects of frequent hemodialysis on blood pressure: Results from the randomized frequent hemodialysis network trials

Hypertension is a common complication of chronic kidney disease and persists among most patients with end‐stage renal disease despite the provision of conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed the effects of frequent HD on blood pressure in the randomized controlled Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. The daily trial randomized 245 patients to 12 months of 6× (“frequent”) vs. 3× (“conventional”) weekly in‐center hemodialysis; the nocturnal trial randomized 87 patients to 12 months of 6× weekly nocturnal HD vs. 3× weekly predominantly home‐based hemodialysis. In the daily trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered predialysis systolic blood pressure by ?7.7 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): ?11.9 to ?3.5] and diastolic blood pressure by ?3.9 mmHg [95% CI: ?6.5 to ?1.3]. In the nocturnal trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered systolic blood pressure by ?7.3 mmHg [95% CI: ?14.2 to ?0.3] and diastolic blood pressure by ?4.2 mmHg [95% CI: ?8.3 to ?0.1]. In both trials, blood pressure treatment effects were sustained until month 12. Frequent HD resulted in significantly fewer antihypertensive medications (daily: ?0.36 medications [95% CI: ?0.65 to ?0.08]; nocturnal: ?0.44 mediations [95% CI: ?0.89 to ?0.03]). In the daily trial, the relative risk per dialysis session for intradialytic hypotension was lower with 6×/week HD but given the higher number of sessions per week, there was a higher relative risk for intradialytic hypotensive requiring saline administration. In summary, frequent HD reduces blood pressure and the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications.