Vascular imaging for hemodialysis vascular access planning

Introduction: Central venous catheters (CVC) increase risks associated with hemodialysis (HD), but may be necessary until an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) is achieved. The impact of vascular imaging on achievement of working AVF and AVG has not been firmly established. Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients initiating HD with CVC in 2010–2011, classified by exposure to venography or Doppler vein mapping, and followed through December 31, 2012. Standard and time‐dependent Cox models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) of death, working AVF, and any AVF or AVG. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of preoperative imaging with successful AVF or AVG among 18,883 individuals who had surgery. Models were adjusted for clinical and demographic factors. Findings: Among 33,918 patients followed for a median of 404 days, 39.1% had imaging and 55.7% had surgery. Working AVF or AVG were achieved in 40.6%; 46.2% died. Compared to nonimaged patients, imaged patients were more likely to achieve working AVF (HR = 1.45 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36, 1.55], P < 0.001]), any AVF or AVG (HR = 1.63 [1.58, 1.69], P > 0.001), and less likely to die (HR = 0.88 [0.83‐0.94], P < 0.001). Among patients who had surgery, the odds ratio for any successful AVF or AVG was 1.09 (1.02–1.16, P = 0.008). Discussion: Fewer than half of patients who initiated HD with a CVC had vascular imaging. Imaged patients were more likely to have vascular surgery and had increased achievement of working AV fistulas and grafts. Outcomes of surgery were similar in patients who did and did not have imaging.     

Challenges of long-term vascular access in pediatric hemodialysis: Recommendations for practitioners

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment of end-stage renal disease in children. However, time to transplant varies, making a well-functioning long-term vascular access essential for performing hemodialysis efficiently and without disruption until a kidney becomes available. However, establishing long-term vascular access in pediatric patients can present distinct challenges due to this population's unique characteristics, such as smaller body size and lower-diameter blood vessels. There are three main pediatric long-term vascular access options, which include central venous catheters (CVC), arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and arteriovenous graft (AVG). CVC are currently the most widely used modality, although various studies and guidelines recommend AVF or AVG as the preferred option. Although AVF should be used whenever possible, it is crucial that clinicians consider factors such as patient size, physical exam findings, comorbidities, predicted duration of treatment to decide on the most optimal long-term vascular access modality. This article reviews the three long-term vascular access methods in children and the benefits and complications of each.     

Vascular access for hemodialysis: experience of a team of nephrologists

A survey conducted by Bonucchi et al. underlined the different types of doctors placing arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis in the United States and Europe (in particular Italy). In fact, nephrologists definitely prevail in Italy, where almost 48.8% of nephrologists place an AVF themselves or with the help of a vascular surgeon (26.4%). In Europe, only 35% do so, whereas 89% of AVF are performed by surgeons in the United States. In 98% of the cases occurring at our center, the AVF was placed and reviewed by the nephrologists. This paper reports surgery cases related to the period between January 1983 and September 2006. Over this time, 1386 operations for placing and reviewing vascular access were conducted. Among these, 47 (3.3%) were related to a cuffed central venous catheter (CVC); 1138 (80.2%) related to a distal AVF; 201 (10.6%) related to a proximal AVF; and 51 (3.6%) related to an arteriovenous graft (AVG). In addition, 33 (2.3%) operations performed before January 1983 relating to AV Scribner shunts were included. Arteriovenous fistulas or AVGs were provided to our patients (only 2.6% of them have a CVC), and AVF rescue operations were performed in the shortest possible time with advantages for the patient and his vascular access.     

Factors predicting failure of AV “fistula first” policy in the elderly

An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferential hemodialysis (HD) access. The goal of this study was to identify factors associated with pre‐dialysis AVF failure in an elderly HD population. We used United States Renal Data System + Medicare claims data to identify patients ≥67 years old who had an AVF as their initial vascular access placed pre‐dialysis. Failure of the AVF to be used for initial HD, was used as the outcome. Logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with AVF failure. The study cohort consisted of 20,360 subjects (76.2 ± 6.02 year old, 58.5% men). Forty‐eight percent of patients initiated dialysis using an AVF, while 52% used a catheter or an AVG. The following variables found to be associated with AVF failure when an AVF was created at least 4 months pre‐HD initiation: older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.02), female gender (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.55–1.83), black race (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.26–1.58), history of diabetes (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06–1.39), cardiac failure (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.15–1.37), and shorter duration of pre–end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) nephrology care (OR for a nephrology care of less than 6 months prior to ESRD of 1.22 compared with a pre‐ESRD nephrology follow up of more than 12 months; 95% CI 1.07–1.38). OR for AVF failure for the entire cohort showed similar findings. In an elderly HD population, there is an association of older age, female gender, black race, diabetes, cardiac failure and shorter pre‐ESRD nephrology care with predialysis AVF failure.     

Safety of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for continuous renal replacement therapy: The Michigan experience

Introduction: Arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/AVG) use is widely considered contraindicated for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), yet insertion of hemodialysis (HD) catheters can carry high complication risk in critically ill end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Methods: Single‐center analysis of 48 consecutive hospitalized ESRD patients on maintenance HD who underwent CRRT using AVF/AVG from 2012 to 2013. Primary outcome was access‐related complications. Findings: Mean age was 60 years, 48% were male, and 88% required vasopressor support. Median duration of AVF/AVG use for CRRT was 4 days (range 1–34). Ten (21%) patients had access complications (5 bleeding, 5 infiltration, 1 thrombosis); 5 (10.4%) required catheter placement. Overall 31 (65%) patients survived to hospital discharge and AVF/AVG access was functional at the time of discharge in 29 (94%) patients. Discussion: In our experience, use of AVF/AVG for CRRT can be performed with a low serious complication rate and low risk of access loss, potentially avoiding catheter‐related complications.     

Hypoproteinemia as a prognostic risk factor for arteriovenous fistula failure

Introduction: Any vascular access is of limited duration with many factors which influence survival in patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). Hypoproteinemia as a marker of chronic illness is common among chronic HD patients. Our aim was to analyze the survival of the primary arteriovenous fistula (AVFs) and the risk factors which influence their patency and to test the hypothesis that patients with normal values of serum proteins have lower risk of AVF failure compared to patients with hypoproteinemia. Methods: Seven hundred thirty‐four consecutive patients were included who underwent creation of an AVF. The patients were prospectively followed‐up for 2 years. Only patients with AVF function after a month from its creation were analyzed. The patients were divided into two subgroups, with normal and low serum protein levels (<65 g/L). Findings: At follow‐up 497 (67.7%) AVFs were still functional while 237 (32.3%) AVFs failed due to thrombosis or stenosis. Serum proteins and AVFs created on the forearm were positive predictors while diabetes was a negative predictor of longer AVF survival (P < 0.001; P = 0.003; P = 0.043). When comparing patients with normal and low serum protein levels (<65 g/L), mean survival time was significantly longer in patients with normal serum levels (P < 0.001). Discussion: In this study, hypoproteinemia was an independent prognostic marker for AVF failure at 2 years. Hypoproteinemia, based on our results, is an independent, more sensitive and prognostic marker of possible vascular access failure than the presence of other common factors which influence shorter AVF survival.     

Catheter‐related bacteremia and mortality in frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis

Frequent nightly home hemodialysis (NHHD) has emerged as an attractive alternative to thrice weekly in‐center hemodialysis, albeit with preponderant long‐term hemodialysis catheter used. Sixty‐three NHHD patients from University of Virginia Lynchburg Dialysis Facility were matched 1:2 with 121 conventional hemodialysis patients admitted to Fresenius Medical Care North America facilities from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010. Matching considered age (± 5 years), gender, race, dialysis vintage, and diabetes. The primary end‐point was the combined incidence of bacteremia/sepsis, for up to 20 months or upon changing to a fistula/graft (with catheter removal), transferring to peritoneal dialysis (PD), or at the time of kidney transplant or death. No significant differences were observed in rate of fistula/graft conversion, transfer to PD, transplant, or death between NHHD and in‐center hemodialysis (IHD) groups. For the first catheter used, the rate of catheter‐related sepsis was not significantly different between the NHHD (1.77 per 100 patient months) and IHD (2.03 per 100 patient months; P = 0.21). Combining all catheters, the rate of bacteremia/sepsis per 100 patient months in the NHHD group was 1.51 and in the IHD group was 2.01 (P = 0.35). Median catheter lifespan for the first catheter was 5.6 (1.7～19.0) for NHHD and 4.6 (2.7～7.8) for the IHD group (P = 0.64), and for all catheters used was 5.2 (Q1～Q3 = 1.5～15.2) months in NHHD group, and 4.1 (2.0～6.8) months in IHD group (P = 0.20). The rate of bacteremia and death is not different for up to 20 months in catheter users who dialyze via frequent NHHD vs. thrice weekly IHD.     

Arteriovenous fistula for the 80 years and older patients on hemodialysis: Is it worth it?

Over the last years, the proportion of patients older than 80 years with end‐stage renal disease has been constantly growing. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is known as the best vascular access for hemodialysis, but evidence for its added value is lacking for elderly. We retrospectively identified new vascular access (AVF and central venous catheter) created or installed between June 2005 and June 2008 in patients 80 years and older and in patients between 50 and 60 years. For every new AVF, we calculated primary failure, primary and secondary patency durations. Fifty‐five and 57 patients had a new vascular access in the >80 years old and 50 to 60 years old groups. Among these, 25 and 41 were new AVF in the older and younger groups. Primary failure was more frequent in elderly than in the younger (40% vs. 17%, P = 0.04). Primary patency was not significantly different in both groups (P = 0.06). Secondary patency was shorter in elderly (P = 0.005). Among the older group, the presence of an AVF was not associated with a difference in mortality (46% vs. 60%, P = 0.28), whereas there was a lower mortality in the younger group with AVF (12% vs. 43% P = 0.008). These results indicate lower patency duration in very elderly patients compared to middle‐aged patients. Without leading to the exclusion of patients over 80 years old for AVF creation, it might reinforce the need of a careful selection and evaluation in this population prior to referral.     

CathAway fistula vascular access program achieves improved outcomes and sets a new standard of treatment for end‐stage renal disease

Hemodialysis patients using central venous catheters (CVCs) for vascular access are at greater risk of infection and death vs. arterial venous fistula (AVF). In 2008, DaVita initiated the CathAway quality improvement initiative, a multidisciplinary program to reduce CVC use in favor of AVF. Our retrospective analysis examined CVC use for incident (≤90 days) and prevalent (>90 days) patients receiving hemodialysis in the years 2006 to 2010. Outcomes included annual mean percentage of patients with CVCs, new CVC placements per 100 patient years, CVC survival, and percentage patient days with CVC. Over 152,000 patient records were reviewed. Between 76.2% and 79.7% of incident patients used a CVC annually, but for prevalent patients, the proportion decreased from 41.1% in 2006 to 33.5% in 2010. The number of new CVC placements per 100 patient years increased slightly for incident patients but fell annually from 64.8 in 2006 to 55.2 in 2010 for prevalent patients. The percentage of treatment days with CVCs was stable among incident patients (70.4%–74.3%) but fell among prevalent patients from 26.1% in 2006 to 16.5% in 2010. The mean duration of CVC use in incident patients was between 53.0 days (SD, 27.8) in 2006 and 54.1 days (SD, 28.1) in 2009, and for prevalent patients between 158.9 days (SD, 123.0) in 2006 and 128.1 days (SD, 112.0) in 2010. CathAway significantly decreased CVC use in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Decreasing incident patient use will require improvements in predialysis care.     

Approach to prophylactic measures for central venous catheter‐related infections in hemodialysis: A critical review

Vascular access is the major risk factor for bacteremia, hospitalization, and mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The type of vascular access most associated with bloodstream infection is central venous catheter (CVC). The incidence of catheter‐related bacteremia ranges between 0.6 and 6.5 episodes per 1000 catheter days and increases linearly with the duration of catheter use. Given the high prevalence of CVC use and its direct association with catheter‐related bacteremia, which adversely impacts morbidity and mortality rates and costs among HD patients, several prevention measures aimed at reducing the rates of CVC‐related infections have been proposed and implemented. As a result, a large number of clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta‐analyses have been conducted in order to assess the effectiveness, clinical applicability, and long‐term adverse effects of such measures. In the following article, prophylactic measures against CVC‐related infections in HD patients and their possible advantages and limitations will be discussed, and the more recent literature on clinical experience with prophylactic antimicrobial lock therapy in HD CVCs will be reviewed.     

Improving arteriovenous fistula rate: Effect on hemodialysis quality

Vascular access (VA) is the lifeline for patients with end‐stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis (HD). Tunneled catheters have been associated with increased risk of luminal thrombosis, infection, hospitalization, and high cost. Our aims were to follow the “Fistula First Initiative,” avoid or reduce the rate of catheter insertion, improve the rate of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use, and study the effect of increased AVF use on quality of dialysis and patient's outcome. A VA program has been established in collaboration with an enthusiastic and professional vascular surgery team to manage 358 patients who have been on regular HD treatment for a period ranging from 1 to 252 months. The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 52 ± 15 years with 62% male patients. Over a period of 2 years, 408 procedures were performed. These include 293 AVFs and 56 arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). Other procedures include 39 permanent catheter insertions, 8 AVF aneurysmectomy, removal of 6 AVGs, embolectomy of 4 AVGs, excision of 1 AVG lymphocele, and ligation of 1 AVF. This program resulted in significant increase in AVF rate from 35% to 82%; reduction in catheter rate from 62% to 10.9%; infection rate down from 6.6% to 0.6%; VA clotting down from 5.1% to 1.0%; and increase in average blood flow rate from 214 ± 32 to 298 ± 37 mL/min (P < 0.01). These results have been associated with improved average single pool Kt/V from 0.88 ± 0.19 to 1.28 ± 0.2 (P < 0.01); increased hemoglobin from 9.2 ± 1.2 to 10.9 ± 0.9 g/dL (P < 0.01); improved serum albumin from 3.2 ± 0.5 to 3.7 ± 0.4 g/dL (P < 0.05); reduction in administered erythropoietin dose by 19%; and significant drop in hospitalization rate from 6.1% to 3.8%. These results confirm the great benefits of AVF on quality of HD and patient outcome, and clearly affirm that AVF should always be considered first.     

Long-term outcomes of transposed basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae

The need for reliable, long-term hemodialysis vascular access remains critical. To determine the long-term outcomes of transposed basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae (BVT) and their comparability with other vascular accesses, we determined retrospectively the primary and secondary patency rates in 58 BVT and in a total of 58 arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) at a single center. Fifty-eight BVT were placed in 57 individuals, 69% after prior vascular access failure. Ten BVT failed before initial use and 2 patients expired with functioning accesses before dialysis initiation. In all 58 BVT, 46.8+/-10.8% functioned at 3 years, with median survival 30.8 months. Limiting analyses to the 46 BVT that were ultimately accessed, 3-year primary and secondary patency rates were 38.3+/-7.7% and 56.5+/-12.6%, respectively. Lower ejection fraction (p=0.054) and greater numbers of prior permanent dialysis catheters (p=0.005) were present in those with failed BVT. Compared with AVF, BVT had similar 3-year primary and secondary patency rates. The secondary patency rate was significantly better for BVT vs. AVG over the observation period; at 3 years, the rates were 56.5+/-12.6% vs. 9.1+/-6.0% (p=0.002), respectively. Basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae are valuable hemodialysis accesses. Although nearly 20% of newly placed BVT will not function before first use, those that are functional have median survivals exceeding 6 years, and 38% will not require intervention within 3 years of initial use.     

The influence of comorbidity on the risk of access-related bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients

Access-related bacteremia is an important cause of morbidity in chronic hemodialysis patients. The incidence of bacteremia is higher in patients dialyzing through a tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC) compared with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Our aim was to explore if this is explained by patient comorbidity. Two groups of chronic hemodialysis outpatients were compared: all patients who dialyzed through a TCVC at any time during 2003 and were fit enough to subsequently have a functioning AVF or renal transplant even if it was after 2003 (Group 1; n=93); and all patients who dialyzed through a TCVC in 2003 and were not fit enough to have a functioning AVF or renal transplant (Group 2; n=119). Episodes of bacteremia (n=71) were identified and those not related to access were excluded. Patients in Group 1 were younger than Group 2 (57.5 years vs. 64.8 years; P=0.001). The incidences of bacteremia in Groups 1 and 2 were, respectively, 0.31 and 0.44 episodes per 1000 patient days while dialyzing through an AVF (P=0.77), and 2.21 and 2.27 per 1000 days while dialyzing through a TCVC (P=0.91). The 3-year actual survival from January 1, 2003 to January 1, 2006 was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (80.6% vs. 26.1%; P<0.0001) confirming the higher comorbidity of the patients in Group 2. Patients dialyzing through a TCVC (compared with an AVF) have a significantly higher risk of access-related bacteremia, irrespective of comorbidity.     

Hemodialysis access-related survival and morbidity in an elderly population in South West Thames, UK

Elderly patients form the most rapidly expanding group of hemodialysis (HD) patients in Europe and the United States. There are initiatives to promote an increase in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation. There are concerns that elderly patients may have lower rates of surgical vascular access compared with younger patients due to risks of higher co-morbidities, surgical complications, and higher AVF nonuse rates. The aim of this study was to compare access-related survival and morbidity for dialysis catheters and AVFs and to evaluate the AVF nonuse rate in an elderly population. We have performed a retrospective analysis of access survival and morbidity in patients > or = 70 years of age, either on maintenance HD or predialysis with preemptive formation of surgical access. One hundred and forty-six patients had permanent HD access created during the 18-month study period, from 1 January 2006 to June 2007. There were 89 male and 57 female patients in whom 78 AVFs and 137 tunneled venous catheters were inserted. There was a significantly greater loss of vascular access due to infection in the catheter group compared with the AVF group (P<0.016). Access survival was also significantly prolonged in the AVF group (446 days, 95% confidence interval 405-487) compared with the catheter group (276 days, 95% confidence interval 240-313), P=0.001. The rate of nonuse of AVFs was low (16%). We conclude that an AVF is the preferred form of vascular access in elderly HD patients.     

Clinical effects of buttonhole cannulation method on hemodialysis patients

Although the buttonhole cannulation method is now widely used as an alternative to the rope‐ladder method in most countries, only the latter method is used in Korea. This study was performed to investigate clinical benefit of the buttonhole technique for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thirty‐two patients receiving HD via mature AVF were included and AVF cannulation was performed by 20 experienced nurses. During the 8 weeks, AVFs were cannulated by the rope‐ladder method with 15‐gauge sharp needles. After creating of 2 pairs of tunnel tracks by sharp needles for 7 weeks, AVFs were cannulated by the buttonhole method using 15‐gauge blunt needles during the 16 weeks. Vascular access blood flow rate (BFR), dialysis venous pressure (DVP), and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) were measured within the first week of the two cannulation methods. Cannulation pain, hemostasis time, and nurse's stress were evaluated at the end of the two methods. There were no statistical differences in vascular access BFR (P = 0.139), DVP (P = 0.152), and dialysis adequacy (P = 0.343) between the two methods. However, the buttonhole method shortened hemostasis time (P = 0.001) and decreased cannulation pain (P = 0.001) as well as nurse's stress (P = 0.001) compared with the rope‐ladder method. In conclusion, the buttonhole cannulation method improves hemostasis time, cannulation pain, and nurse's stress without a change in vascular access BFR and dialysis adequacy in HD patients.     

Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in the nose of patients on regular dialysis treatment using hemodialysis catheters

In the hemodialysis population, the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus colonization has been documented to be as high as 80%; effective prophylaxis of vascular access infection and bacteremia is a worthwhile goal in the management of hemodialysis population. Surveillance of 50 hemodialysis patients for S. aureus‐positive nasal cultures was performed by monthly nasal swabs over a 12‐month period. All patients were performing dialysis using hemodialysis catheters thrice weekly. All positive cultures were treated with a prophylactic antibiotic regimen. Thirty‐one patients (62%) had one or more positive cultures. The surveillance period was longer in the S. aureus nasal carriers (p < 0.01). The frequency of positive cultures correlated with the duration of surveillance (p < 0.05). The incidence of S. aureus bacteremia was greater in patients with three or more positive cultures (p < 0.05). This study suggests that continuous surveillance for S. aureus nasal colonization is essential to properly identify all hemodialysis patients using catheters at risk of developing S. aureus bacteremias.     

Ten‐year study of bacteremia in hemodialysis patients in a single center

Background: The incidence of infection in patients on chronic hemodialysis in higher than that of the general population. Infection is known to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. The vascular access is important for hemodialysis, but infection through this route is the most common source of bacteremia and can be lethal to the patients. Despite the high morbidity and mortality of bacteremia in patients on chronic hemodialysis, the clinical characteristics of bacteremia in hemodialysis patients is rarely reported yet in Korea. Methods: We included 696 hemodialysis patients from January 1993 to December 2003 at Uijongbu St. Mary's Hospital. We investigated incidence, source, causative organisms, clinical manifestations, complication, and mortality of bacteremia. We compared clinical factors, morbidity, and mortality between arteriovenous fistula and central venous catheter groups. Results: Total 52 cases of bacteremia occurred in 43 patients. The major source of infection was vascular access (48%). Staphylococcus aureus was most common organism isolated. Major complications were septic shock (9.6%), pneumonia (9.6%), infective endocarditis (3.8%), and aortic pseudoaneurysm (1.9%). Nine patients died from septic shock (n = 4), aspiration pneumonia (n = 2), hypoxic brain injury (n = 1), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1), and rupture of aortic pseudoaneurysm. The central venous catheter group (n = 22) had higher incidences of vascular access as a source of infection (81.8% vs 23.3%, p < 0.001) and staphylococcus as a causative organism (77.2% vs 50.0%, p = 0.042) than the arteriovenous group. Conclusion: This data shows that bacteremia causes high incidence of fatal complications and mortality. Therefore, careful management of vascular access as well as early detection of bacteremia is an important factor for the prevention of infection and proper antibiotic therapy should be started early.     

Why Do So Many Patients Have a Dialysis Catheter and Not Arteriovenous Fistulae or Grafts?

The Dialysis Outcome and Quality Initiative has guidelines for vascular access and states that the dialysis catheter (DC) should be limited to less than 20% of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Our center has found this target difficult to achieve.
Objective:  We wondered what the reasons for use of a DC might be.
Methods:  We noted the number of patients with a DC in place and assessed the reasons why the DC was being used on 8/1/03.
Results:  73 of the 170 (42.9%) patients had a DC on 8/1/03. 24 (32.9%) of the patients refused to have initial arteriovenous fistulae or grafts (AVF/G) or a secondary AVF/G revision or replacement procedure performed after initial AVF/G failure. 15 (20.5%) patients had a maturing AVF/G, 12 (16.4%) had significant medical and/or surgical contraindications for AVF/G placement, 9 (12.3%) patients were awaiting surgical thrombectomy, revision or placement of AVF/G, 6 patients (8.2%) were awaiting transfer to CPD therapy, 4 (5.5%) patients were undecided about having an AVF/G placed, and 1 (1.4%) had acute renal failure and early ESRD recovery was expected. Only 2 (2.7%) patients had no access plan by the nephrology team.
Conclusions:  Patients' refusal for an AVF/G placement and patients with a maturing AVF/G or awaiting surgical revision or placement were the most common reasons for the use of a DC in our center. To significantly impact on the high use of the DC, it would be crucial to better understand the reasons for patients' refusals.     

Creation of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis in octogenarians

Elderly patients, defined as octogenarians and nonagenarians, are an increasing population entering renal replacement therapy. Advanced age appears as an exclusive factor negatively influencing dialysis practice. Elderly patients are referred late for the initiation of hemodialysis and more likely are offered catheters rather than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), which increase mortality and negatively affect quality of life. We present our approach to the creation of vascular access for hemodialysis in this demanding population. In 2006–2012, 39 patients aged 85.9 ± 2.05 with end‐stage renal disease, mainly resulting from ischemic nephropathy, were admitted to the Department of Nephrology to establish permanent vascular access for hemodialysis: preferably AVF. Temporary dialysis catheters were implanted in uremic emergency to bridge the time to fistula creation/maturation. AVF was attempted in 87.2% of the patients. Primary AVF function was achieved in 54% of the patients. Cumulative proportional survival of AVF at months 12 and 24 was 81.5%. Ninety‐four percent of AVF were localized on the forearm: 74% in the distal and 20% in the proximal part. Mean duration of hemodialysis therapy was 20.80 ± 19.45 months. The mean time of AVF use was 15.9 ± 20.2 months. Until present, 38% have been dialyzed using AVF for 31.0 ± 18.8 months. Five patients died with functioning fistula. Eight patients initiated hemodialysis therapy with fistula. During further observation, the use of AVF increased to 62%. Elderly patients should not be denied creation of AVF as a rule. The outcome of AVF benefits more from acknowledging individual vascular conditions rather than age of the patient.     

Effect of alternate night nocturnal home hemodialysis on anemia control in patients with end‐stage renal disease

Nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) has shown promising results in various clinical parameters. Whether NHHD provide benefit in anemia management remains controversial. This study aims to investigate whether anemia and erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent (ESA) requirement are improved in patients receiving alternate night NHHD compared with conventional hemodialysis (CHD). In this retrospective controlled study, a clinical data of 23 patients receiving NHHD were compared with 25 in‐center CHD patients. Hemoglobin level, ESA requirement, iron profile, and dialysis adequacy indexes were compared between the two groups. Hemoglobin level increased from baseline of 9.37 ± 1.39 g/dL to 11.34 ± 2.41 g/dL at 24 months (P < 0.001) and ESA requirement decreased from 103.44 ± 53.55 U/kg/week to 47.33 ± 50.62 U/kg/week (P < 0.001) in NHHD patients. ESA requirement further reduced after the first year of NHHD (P = 0.037). Standard Kt/V increased from baseline of 2.02 ± 0.28 to 3.52 ± 0.30 at 24 months (P < 0.001). At 24 months, hemoglobin level increased by 1.98 ± 2.74 g/dL in the NHHD group while it decreased by 0.20 ± 2.32 g/dL in the CHD group (P = 0.007). ESA requirement decreased by 53.49 ± 55.50 U/kg/week in NHHD patients whereas it increased by 16.22 ± 50.01 U/kg/week in CHD patients (P < 0.001). Twenty‐six percent of NHHD patients were able to stop ESA compared with none in the CHD group. Standard Kt/V showed greater increase in the NHHD group. (1.49 ± 0.36 in NHHD vs. 0.18 ± 0.31 in CHD, P = 0.005). NHHD with an alternate night schedule improves anemia and reduces ESA requirement as a result of enhanced uremic clearance. This benefit extended beyond the first year of NHHD.