共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
O2/CO2气氛下煤粉燃烧反应动力学的试验研究 总被引:8,自引:2,他引:8
在热重分析仪上进行了模拟空气气氛及不同O2浓度(21%、30%、40%、80%)的O2/CO2气氛下3种不同品质煤粉(龙岩无烟煤、贵州烟煤、元宝山褐煤)的燃烧特性试验,确定了3种煤粉的燃烧特征参数并进行了动力学分析.结果表明,O2/CO2气氛下煤粉的燃烧分布曲线与O2/N2气氛下有明显不同,在相同O2浓度的条件下,O2/CO2气氛下煤粉燃烧速率低,燃尽时间长;随着O2浓度的增加,燃烧DTG曲线向低温区偏移,着火温度及燃尽温度降低,燃尽时间缩短,可燃性指数及燃尽指数明显提高;O2/CO2气氛下煤粉燃烧基本属于一级反应,动力学参数随燃烧气氛与煤质变化的不同有较大差异. 相似文献
2.
煤粉与生物质混燃的低温着火特性 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
利用自制的管式炉恒温热重测量实验台研究了掺混比、温度、煤种以及生物质种类等因素对煤粉与生物质混燃时低温着火特性的影响,并对煤粉与生物质混燃时的低温着火活化能进行了计算.结果表明:随着掺混比的增大,混合物的燃烧速率加快且燃尽程度提高;温度升高能改善煤粉与生物质混合物的燃烧特性;掺混生物质对难燃煤的着火特性影响比对易燃煤更明显;对于某一煤种,掺混水分和挥发分含量高的生物质,燃烧初期的失重速率加快;掺混灰分含量越多的生物质,在燃烧后期对煤粉的促燃作用越差;燃烧反应活化能随着生物质掺混比和温度区间的增大而减小. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
采用热重分析法研究富氧燃烧(O_2/CO_2)气氛、O_2体积分数和煤粉活性对褐煤、烟煤、无烟煤3种煤粉燃烧性能的影响,并进行分温度区间的燃烧反应动力学分析。结果表明:褐煤和无烟煤发生非均相着火,烟煤发生均相-非均相着火;相比空气气氛,O_2体积分数相同的O_2/CO_2气氛下煤粉的着火温度和燃尽温度升高,燃尽时间延长;在O_2/CO_2气氛下,当O_2体积分数增大时,煤粉着火温度和燃尽温度降低,燃尽时间缩短;相同气氛下,煤粉活性显著影响其着火和燃尽;根据综合燃烧特性指数判断,增大O_2体积分数显著改善了煤粉的燃尽特性;在低温区,煤粉燃烧属于0.3级反应,在高温区则为1~2.5级反应。 相似文献
7.
为了研究煤粉与生物质气混燃对锅炉燃烧特性以及燃烧产物的影响,基于Aspen软件搭建了生物质气化模型,得到气化效率最高时的生物质气;基于Fluent软件搭建生物质气与煤粉的混合燃烧模型,在保证锅炉总输入热不变的情况下,分析煤粉锅炉掺烧10%不同的生物质气的锅炉炉膛温度分布和主要的烟气组分。结果表明:在分别掺烧10%的松木气、秸秆气和木屑气后相对于纯煤粉燃烧,炉膛燃烧区温度由1 843 K下降到1 789 K,炉膛出口烟温增大,O_2和CO出口体积分数增大,CO_2出口体积分数降低,NO_x出口质量浓度值由原来的548 mg/Nm~3降到500 mg/Nm~3以下。 相似文献
8.
何天荣 《锅炉压力容器安全技术》2003,(2):1-4
综合介绍了水煤浆、水煤浆技术,水煤浆应用于煤粉锅炉燃烧、雾化特性、燃烧器喷嘴、保证着火和稳定燃烧的一些措施,以及低污染燃烧技术等在国内外的研究和开发情况。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Effects of coal characteristics to performance of a highly efficient thermal power generation system based on pressurized oxy‐fuel combustion
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《国际能源研究杂志》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Because of its fuel flexibility and high efficiency, pressurized oxy‐fuel combustion has recently emerged as a promising approach for efficient carbon capture and storage. One of the important options to design the pressurized oxy‐combustion is to determine method of coal (or other solid fuels) feeding: dry feeding or wet (coal slurry) feeding as well as grade of coals. The main aim of this research is to investigate effects of coal characteristics including wet or dry feeding on the performance of thermal power plant based on the pressurized oxy‐combustion with CO2 capture versus atmospheric oxy‐combustion. A commercial process simulation tool (gCCS: the general carbon capture and storage) was used to simulate and analyze an advanced ultra‐supercritical(A‐USC) coal power plant under pressurized and atmospheric oxy‐fuel conditions. The design concept is based on using pure oxygen as an oxidant in a pressurized system to maximize the heat recovery through process integration and to reduce the efficiency penalty because of compression and purification units. The results indicate that the pressurized case efficiency at 30 bars was greater than the atmospheric oxy‐fuel combustion (base line case) by 6.02% when using lignite coal firing. Similarly, efficiency improvements in the case of subbituminous and bituminous coals were around 3% and 2.61%, respectively. The purity of CO2 increased from 53.4% to 94% after compression and purification. In addition, the study observed the effects of coal‐water slurry using bituminous coal under atmospheric conditions, determining that the net plant efficiency decreased by 3.7% when the water content in the slurry increased from 11.12% to 54%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
16.
An investigation of thermal behaviour of biomass and coal during co‐combustion using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《国际能源研究杂志》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
The thermal behaviour and kinetic analysis of biomass (cypress wood chips and macadamia nut shells) and Australian bituminous coal during combustion were studies using the thermogravimetric technique with four different heating rates under an air atmosphere. Each type of biomass was blended with coal at mass ratios (biomass:coal) of 95:5, 90:10, 85:15 and 80:20 to investigate the effect of coal as a supplementary fuel on thermal behaviour during the combustion process. Combustion of the individual samples and the blends took place in three steps comprising dehydration, devolatilisation and char oxidation. During co‐combustion, the thermal decomposition behaviour of the blends followed that of the weighted average of the individual samples in the blends. In kinetic analysis, thermal decomposition of biomass and coal appeared to take place independently, and thus, the activation energy of the blends can be calculated from that of the two components. No evidence for any significant synergetic effects or thermal interaction was found between either type of biomass and the coal during co‐combustion based on the lack of deviation from expected behaviour of the blends. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.