Model Checking Games for the Quantitative μ-Calculus

We investigate quantitative extensions of modal logic and the modal μ-calculus, and study the question whether the tight connection between logic and games can be lifted from the qualitative logics to their quantitative counterparts. It turns out that, if the quantitative μ-calculus is defined in an appropriate way respecting the duality properties between the logical operators, then its model checking problem can indeed be characterised by a quantitative variant of parity games. However, these quantitative games have quite different properties than their classical counterparts, in particular they are, in general, not positionally determined. The correspondence between the logic and the games goes both ways: the value of a formula on a quantitative transition system coincides with the value of the associated quantitative game, and conversely, the values of quantitative parity games are definable in the quantitative μ-calculus.     

Conceptual modeling in full computation‐tree logic with sequence modal operator

In this paper, we propose a method for modeling concepts in full computation‐tree logic with sequence modal operators. An extended full computation‐tree logic, CTLS*, is introduced as a Kripke semantics with a sequence modal operator. This logic can appropriately represent hierarchical tree structures in cases where sequence modal operators in CTLS* are applied to tree structures. We prove a theorem for embedding CTLS* into CTL*. The validity, satisfiability, and model‐checking problems of CTLS* are shown to be decidable. An illustrative example of biological taxonomy is presented using CTLS* formulas. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

模态转移系统的三值逻辑模型检验

分析了现有的模型检验技术应用于模态转移系统的三值逻辑公式的模型检验中存在的问题.提出了把模态转移系统转换成Kripke结构的算法以及三值逻辑公式转换成2个二值逻辑的算法,经过转换后可用现有的模型检验技术进行模型检验.用该算法转换后,状态数、转移数和原子命题数目与原模型呈线性关系,没有增加模型检验的复杂度.     

Multi-valued autoepistemic logic

We generalize Moore's autoepistemic logic to multi-valued autoepistemic logic, where the set of truth-values can be any complete lattice. Multi-valued autoepistemic extensions can be characterized by admissible belief interpretations which are the conrete approximations of extensions and are appropriate to be computed and manipulated. We prove that multi-valued autoepistemic extensions are exactly the theories of maximal multi-valued Kripke models. The class of stratified theories is investigated and it is shown that stratified theories have exactly one multi-valued autoepistemic extension. Finally we present a sequent calculus for multi-valued logic which serves as a tool for a decision procedure for multi-valued autoepistemic logic.     

A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks

In this paper, we propose a logic of argumentation for the specification and verification (LA4SV) of requirements on Dung??s abstract argumentation frameworks. We distinguish three kinds of decision problems for argumentation verification, called extension verification, framework verification, and specification verification respectively. For example, given a political requirement like ??if the argument to increase taxes is accepted, then the argument to increase services must be accepted too,?? we can either verify an extension of acceptable arguments, or all extensions of an argumentation framework, or all extensions of all argumentation frameworks satisfying a framework specification. We introduce the logic of argumentation verification to specify such requirements, and we represent the three verification problems of argumentation as model checking and theorem proving properties of the logic. Moreover, we recast the logic of argumentation verification in a modal framework, in order to express multiple extensions, and properties like transitivity and reflexivity of the attack relation. Finally, we introduce a logic of meta-argumentation where abstract argumentation is used to reason about abstract argumentation itself. We define the logic of meta-argumentation using the fibring methodology in such a way to represent attack relations not only among arguments but also among attacks. We show how to use this logic to verify the requirements of argumentation frameworks where higher-order attacks are allowed [A preliminary version of the logic of argumentation compliance was called the logic of abstract argumentation?(2005).]     

Syntactic codes and grammar refinement

We callsyntactic coding a technique which converts syntactic principles or constraints on representations into grammatical rules which can be implemented in any given rule grammar. In this paper we show that any principle or constraint on output trees formalizable in a certain fragment of dynamic logic over trees can be coded in this sense. This allows to reduce in a mechanical fashion most of the current theories of government and binding into GPSG-style grammars. This will be exemplified with Rizzi'sRelativized Minimality.     

A New Research into Default Logic

In previous papers some important properties of extensions of general default theories were given. In order to dedicate further research to default logic, a characterization of extensions is presented again and some new algorithms for reasoning tasks in default logic are presented in this paper. A class of default theories, auto-compatible default theory, is also developed. We show that the characterization and notions of compatibility and auto-compatibility, suitably applied to logic programs, yield some sufficient conditions of existence of answer sets. All these essentially develop the theories of Reiter and his followers.     

Structuring Metatheory on Inductive Definitions

We examine a problem for machine supported metatheory. There are true statements about a theory that are true of some (but only some) extensions; however, standard theory-structuring facilities do not support selective inheritance. We use the example of the deduction theorem for modal logic and show how a statement about a theory can explicitly formalize the closure conditions extensions should satisfy for it to remain true. We show how metatheories based on inductive definitions allow theories and general metatheorems to be organized this way and report on a case study using the theory FS₀.     

Stable and extension class theory for logic programs and default logics

The stable model semantics (cf. Gelfond and Lifschitz [1]) for logic programs suffers from the problem that programs may not always have stable models. Likewise, default theories suffer from the problem that they do not always have extensions. In such cases, both these formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning have an inadequate semantics. In this paper, we propose a novel idea-that of extension classes for default logics, and of stable classes for logic programs. It is shown that the extension class and stable class semantics extend the extension and stable model semantics respectively. This allows us to reason about inconsistent default theories, and about logic programs with inconsistent completions. Our work extends the results of Marek and Truszczynski [2] relating logic programming and default logics.     

和与积数迷的符号化模型检测

和与积是一个著名的数迷问题.采用公告逻辑对该问题进行建模,将其Kripke模型符号化表示为多智能体有限状态程序,并在其上采用一种基于局部命题解释系统语义的知识逻辑符号化模型检测算法计算该问题的所有解.在时态逻辑模型检测器NuSMV基础上扩展实现了本文算法,然后在相同实验平台上用动态认知建模工具DEMO对该问题进行求解.实验表明,我们的算法不仅结果正确,而且在运行效率上与DEMO相比占有绝对优势.     

Tabling for non‐monotonic programming

Non‐monotonic extensions add power to logic programs. However, the main logic programming language, Prolog, is widely recognized as inadequate to implement these extensions due to its weak termination and complexity properties. By extending Prolog’s SLD resolution with tabling, Prolog can be improved in several ways. Tabling can allow a logic programming system to compute the well‐founded semantics for programs with bounded term depth, and to do so with polynomial data complexity. By exploiting these properties, tabling allows a variety of non‐monotonic extensions to be efficiently implemented, and used to solve practical problems. In this paper we describe tabling as it is implemented in the XSB system and show how it can be used to construct meta‐interpreters (or preprocessors) for two sample formalisms: the Well‐Founded Semantics with Explicit Negation, and Generalized Annotated Logic Programs. We also describe how non‐monotonic extensions are used in practical applications such as psychiatric diagnosis, extraction of information from poorly structured textual data, and model checking. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Considerations on default logic: an alternative approach1

In the following paper we analyze Reiter's default logic and suggest modifying the notion of an extension for default theories. This modification leads to two important properties which are not guaranteed in Reiter's formalism: the existence of extensions and semimonotonicity.     

Some Results on Default Logic

In the previous paper,some important properties of extensions of general default theories were given.In order to further explore default logic,a characterization of extensions is presented.And a class of defaults,so-called Auto-compatible Default Theory,is also introduced.All these essentially develop the theories of Reiter and his followers.     

Clausal resolution in a logic of rational agency

A resolution based proof system for a Temporal Logic of Possible Belief is presented. This logic is the combination of the branching-time temporal logic CTL (representing change over time) with the modal logic KD45 (representing belief ). Such combinations of temporal or dynamic logics and modal logics are useful for specifying complex properties of multi-agent systems. Proof methods are important for developing verification techniques for these complex multi-modal logics. Soundness, completeness and termination of the proof method are shown and simple examples illustrating its use are given.     

T-Resolution: Refinements and Model Elimination

T-resolution is a binary rule, proposed by Policriti and Schwartz in 1995 for theorem proving in first-order theories (T-theorem proving) that can be seen – at least at the ground level – as a variant of Stickel's theory resolution. In this paper we consider refinements of this rule as well as the model elimination variant of it. After a general discussion concerning our viewpoint on theorem proving in first-order theories and a brief comparison with theory resolution, the power and generality of T-resolution are emphasized by introducing suitable linear and ordered refinements, uniformly and in strict analogy with the standard resolution approach. Then a model elimination variant of T-resolution is introduced and proved to be sound and complete; some experimental results are also reported. In the last part of the paper we present two applications of T-resolution: to constraint logic programming and to modal logic.     

Deciding Regular Grammar Logics with Converse Through First-Order Logic

We provide a simple translation of the satisfiability problem for regular grammar logics with converse into GF², which is the intersection of the guarded fragment and the 2-variable fragment of first-order logic. The translation is theoretically interesting because it translates modal logics with certain frame conditions into first-order logic, without explicitly expressing the frame conditions. It is practically relevant because it makes it possible to use a decision procedure for the guarded fragment in order to decide regular grammar logics with converse. The class of regular grammar logics includes numerous logics from various application domains. A consequence of the translation is that the general satisfiability problem for every regular grammar logics with converse is in EXPTIME. This extends a previous result of the first author for grammar logics without converse. Other logics that can be translated into GF² include nominal tense logics and intuitionistic logic. In our view, the results in this paper show that the natural first-order fragment corresponding to regular grammar logics is simply GF² without extra machinery such as fixed-point operators.