Intimal hyperplasia thickness at follow-up is independent of stent size: a serial intravascular ultrasound study

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the thickness of the intimal hyperplasia (IH) layer that accumulates within Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on stent size. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative angiographic (QCA) studies were performed after stent implantation and at follow-up (5.4 +/- 3.8 months) in 161 patients with 177 lesions treated with 221 Palmaz-Schatz stents. Stent and lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured. IH CSA and thickness at follow-up were calculated and compared with stent CSA and circumference. Maximum IH CSA and thickness were measured at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA; mean IH CSA and thickness was averaged over the length of the stent. Maximum IH CSA measured 4.8 +/- 2.4 mm2, and mean IH CSA measured 2.8 +/- 2.2 mm2. Maximum IH thickness (at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA) measured 0.60 +/- 0.36 mm, and mean IH thickness (over the length of the stent) measured 0.30 +/- 0.19 mm. There was a weak, but significant correlation between mean and maximum IH CSA versus stent CSA (r = 0.215, p <0.0001 and r = 0.355, p <0.0001, respectively). However, there was no correlation between mean or maximum IH thickness versus stent CSA (r = 0.018, p = 0.643 and r = 0.056, p = 0.463, respectively) or stent circumference (r = 0.002, p = 0.956 and r = 0.069, p = 0.361, respectively). IH thickness was found to be independent of the stent size. This explains the known higher frequency of restenosis in smaller stents compared with larger stents.     

Stent recoil: comparison of the Wiktor-GX coil and the Palmaz-Schatz tubular coronary stent

Wiktor-GX coil stents and Palmaz-Schatz 154A tubular stents were implanted in a consecutive series of 40 patients and 45 arteries undergoing successful primary stent placement in de novo lesions treated with single stents in order to compare the acute recoil of a coil stent to a tubular stent in native coronary arteries. Acute stent recoil was determined by measuring the difference between the maximum inflated diameter of the stent deployment balloon and the minimum lumen diameter after stent deployment. There was no difference between the two groups for reference vessel diameter, nominal balloon diameter, maximum inflated balloon diameter, maximum inflation pressure, or poststent vessel minimum lumen diameter. Acute recoil averaged 0.15 +/- 0.2 mm for the Wiktor-GX and 0.13 +/- 0.1 for the Palmaz-Schatz (P = 0.58). In this series of patients, there was no significant difference between the acute recoil of the coil stent compared to the tubular stent.     

Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?

It is unclear whether new devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation improve long-term outcomes compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and de novo coronary artery lesions of type A or type B except for complete occlusive lesions investigated by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A total of 146 patients with stable angina and simple lesions were assigned to either conventional balloon angioplasty (62 patients), DCA (50 patients), or Palmaz-Schatz implantation (34 patients). The acute results and late outcomes were assessed by coronary angiography. The results of the three procedures were similar with respect to procedural success and complications. Patients who underwent stenting or DCA had a larger immediate increase in the diameter of the lumen and a larger luminal diameter immediately after the procedure than those who underwent balloon angioplasty. At six months follow-up, the patients treated by stenting continued to have a larger luminal diameter and a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with balloon angioplasty (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.85 +/- 0.83 mm, p < 0.005; 5.9% vs 29%, p < 0.05) and DCA (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.90 +/- 0.96 mm, p < 0.05; 5.9% vs 24%, NS). The patients treated with balloon angioplasty had a smaller late loss than those treated with DCA or Palmaz-Schatz stent. The patients treated with DCA had a larger loss index than those treated with balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent. Stenting was a significant factor in decreasing the rate of restenosis by logistic regression analysis, compared with balloon angioplasty. The angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received other treatments. This study suggests that even lesions stable for treatment by balloon angioplasty and DCA can also be treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.     

Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine whether oversized implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent provides a more favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in chronic total occlusions than does conventional coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis and reocclusion remain major limitations of balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Enforced mechanical remodeling by implantation of the oversized Wallstent may prevent elastic recoil and improve accommodation of intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Lumen dimension was measured by a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography system (CAAS II). These measurements (before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up) were compared between the groups with Wallstent implantation (20 lesions, 20 patients) and conventional balloon angioplasty (266 lesions, 249 patients) for treatment of chronic total occlusion. Acute gain (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that before intervention), late loss (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that at follow-up) and net gain (acute gain minus late loss) were examined. RESULTS: Wallstent deployment was successful in all patients. High pressure intra-Wallstent balloon inflation (mean +/- SD 14 +/- 3 atm) was performed in all lesions. Although vessel size did not differ between the Wallstent and balloon angioplasty groups, acute gain was significantly greater in the Wallstent group (2.96 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.34 mm, p < 0.0001). Although late loss was also significantly larger in the Wallstent group (0.81 +/- 0.95 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05), net gain was still significantly greater in this group (2.27 +/- 1.00 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.69 mm, p < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) occurred at 6 months in 29% of lesions in the Wallstent group and in 45% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5150). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the oversized Wallstent, with full coverage of the lesion length, ensures resetting of the vessel size to its original caliber before disease and allows greater accommodation of intimal hyperplasia and chronic vessel recoil. Wallstent implantation provides a more favorable short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than does conventional balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions.     

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome of the new, less shortening Wallstent in native coronary arteries

BACKGROUND: The new, less shortening, self-expanding Wallstent is characterized by longitudinal flexibility, a protective membrane, a low profile, and a customized range of diameters (3.5 to 6.0 mm). The recent modification of the braiding angle of the Wallstent has resulted in a new device with less shortening on expansion and a concomitant reduction in radial force. We hypothesized that the enforced mechanical remodeling produced by the selection of an oversized Wallstent might result in improved accommodation of subsequent reactive intimal hyperplasia and prevention of chronic recoil of the vessel. METHODS AND RESULTS: To prove this hypothesis, we recently implanted 44 new, less shortening Wallstents in 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients with acute or threatened closure after balloon angioplasty, according to a strategy of oversizing of Wallstent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length. The initial and 6-month follow-up angiograms were analyzed with a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) system. Acute gain (minimal luminal diameter [MLD] post minus MLD pre) and late loss (MLD post minus MLD at follow-up) were examined. Stent deployment was successful in 44 of 44 attempts (100%). Nominal stent diameter used was 1.40 mm larger than the maximal vessel diameter. One patient (3%) with a dilated but unstented lesion proximal to the stented segment sustained a subacute occlusion on day 1 associated with myocardial infarction. Event-free survival at 30 days after stent implantation was 97% (34 of 35 patients). Of the 34 patients eligible for 6-month angiographic follow-up, 3 who were asymptomatic declined repeat angiography. MLD (and percent diameter stenosis [% DS]) changed from 0.83 +/- 0.50 mm (72%) pre through 3.06 +/- 0.48 mm (15%) post to 2.27 +/- 0.74 mm (28%) at follow-up. Acute gain was 2.23 +/- 0.63 mm, and late loss was 0.78 +/- 0.61 mm. Angiographic restenosis ( > 50% DS) was observed in 5 of 31 patients (16%) at 6 months, all of whom underwent repeat angioplasty. Thus, the overall event-free survival at 6-month follow-up was 83% (29 of 35 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The oversized Wallstent implantation with complete coverage of the lesion length conveyed a favorable 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome. The large acute gain obtained by the Wallstent afforded greater accommodation of the subsequent late loss. The enforced mechanical remodeling by oversized new Wallstents may result in prevention of acute and chronic recoil of the vessel wall and subsequently a lower restenosis rate at follow-up.     

Relationship between age of blastocyst formation and interferon-tau secretion by in vitro-derived bovine embryos

The quantitative analysis of a three-dimensional (3-D) intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) image data set permits a more comprehensive assessment of coronary arterial segments. The 3-D image sets are generally acquired during continuous motorized pullbacks. However, the cyclic changes of vascular dimensions and the cyclic spatial displacement of the ICUS transducer relative to the vessel wall can result in characteristic image artifacts, which may limit the applicability of quantitative automated analysis systems. This limitation may be overcome by an ECG-gated image acquisition. In the present study we acquired in vivo (1) nongated and (2) ECG-gated 3-D ICUS image sets of 15 human atherosclerotic coronary arteries and performed a computer-assisted contour detection of the lumen and total vessel boundaries. Total vessel and lumen volumes measured significantly larger in the nongated versus ECG-gated end-diastolic image sets (753+/-307 mm3 vs. 705+/-305 mm3; 411+/-154 mm3 vs. 388+/-165 mm3, both: P < 0.05). Both end-diastolic and systolic measurements were available in nine arteries, showing a larger total vessel and lumen volume at systole (664+/-221 mm3 vs. 686+/-227 mm3, P=0.03; 384+/-164 mm3 vs. 393+/-170 mm3, P=0.08). The differences observed may be of particular interest for volumetric ICUS studies, addressing presumably small differences in vessel or lumen dimensions.     

Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups

With the increasing clinical application of new devices for percutaneous coronary revascularization, maximization of the acute angiographic result has become widely recognized as a key factor in maintained clinical and angiographic success. What is unclear, however, is whether the specific mode of action of different devices might exert an additional independent effect on late luminal renarrowing. The purpose of this study was to investigate such a difference in the degree of provocation of luminal renarrowing (or 'restenosis propensity') by different devices, among 3660 patients, who had 4342 lesions successfully treated by balloon angioplasty (n = 3797), directional coronary atherectomy (n = 200), Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (n = 229) or excimer laser coronary angioplasty (n = 116) and who also underwent quantitative angiographic analysis pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. To allow valid comparisons between the groups, because of significant differences in coronary vessel size (balloon angioplasty = 2.62 +/- 0.55 mm, directional coronary atherectomy = 3.28 +/- 0.62 mm, excimer laser coronary angioplasty = 2.51 +/- 0.47 mm, Palmaz-Schatz = 3.01 +/- 0.44 mm; P < 0.0001), the comparative measurements of interest selected were the 'relative loss' in luminal diameter (RLoss = loss/vessel size) to denote the restenosis process, and the 'relative lumen at follow-up' (RLfup = minimal luminal diameter at follow up/vessel size) to represent the angiographic outcome. For consistency, lesion severity pre-intervention was represented by the 'relative lumen pre' (RLpre = minimal luminal diameter pre/vessel size) and the luminal increase at intervention was measured as 'relative gain' (relative gain = gain/ vessel size). Differences in restenosis propensity between devices was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate models were constructed to determine relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up, taking account of relative lumen pre-intervention, lesion location, relative gain, vessel size and the device used. In addition, model-estimated relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up at given relative lumen pre-intervention relative gain and vessel size, were compared among the four groups. Significant differences were detected among the groups both with respect to these estimates, as well as in the degree of influence of progressively increasing relative gain, on the extent of renarrowing (relative loss) and angiographic outcome (relative lumen at follow-up), particularly at higher levels of luminal increase (relative gain). Specifically, lesions treated by balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (the predominantly 'dilating' interventions) were associated with more favourable angiographic profiles than directional atherectomy or excimer laser (the mainly 'debulking' interventions). Significant effects of lesion severity and location, as well as the well known influence of luminal increase on both luminal renarrowing and late angiographic outcome were also noted. These findings indicate that propensity to restenosis after apparently successful intervention is influenced not only by the degree of luminal enlargement achieved at intervention, but by the device used to achieve it. In view of the clinical implications of such findings, further evaluation in larger randomized patient populations is warranted.     

The feasibility of intracarotid adenosine for the manipulation of human cerebrovascular resistance

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting (CS) in a consecutive series of patients. BACKGROUND: Although stenting in highly selected patient groups reduces restenosis, the results of stenting in a heterogeneous patient group and the effects of clinical and procedural factors on stent restenosis are currently unclear. METHODS: We analyzed the 6-month angiographic outcome of 500 lesions in 463 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS. Clinical, qualitative and quantitative angiographic variables were correlated with restenosis assessed as both a binary and a continuous variable. RESULTS: Restenosis, defined as the presence of >50% diameter stenosis in the dilated segment, was present in 105 (26%) of the 405 lesions with angiographic follow-up. The mean late lumen loss during the follow-up period was 0.79+/-0.64 mm. Implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.0001) and a high acute gain (p < 0.0002) were independently associated with a higher late lumen loss. In contrast, the use of high inflation pressure (p < 0.02) and Palmaz-Schatz stents (p < 0.005) was independently associated with a lower late lumen loss. When restenosis was defined as a qualitative variable, implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.001), stenosis length (p < 0.01), small reference diameter (p < 0.02) and stent type other than Palmaz-Schatz (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of restenosis. None of the clinical variables tested was associated with restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting in an unselected patient group is associated with an acceptable restenosis rate. Although some risk factors were identified, the risk of restenosis was not related to most of the variables tested. This suggests that the superiority of CS over balloon angioplasty, in terms of restenosis, might also apply to subgroups of patients that were not included in the recent randomized studies.     

Restenosis rate after intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stent implantation

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients fulfilling intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for optimal coronary stent implantation show a reduction in the restenosis rate at 6 months. IVUS guidance for stent dilation may be associated with facilitated stent implantation and an increased acute luminal gain, but it has not yet been determined, whether and to what extent this procedure is associated with a reduction in the restenosis rate. IVUS-guided optimization of Palmaz-Schatz stent placement was performed in 125 consecutive patients, 64 of whom fulfilled IVUS-criteria for optimal stent placement. Another 125 patients served as the non-IVUS control group. In 107 patients (86%) of the non-IVUS control group and 105 patients (84%) of the IVUS group, angiographic follow-up was performed. The IVUS group of patients revealed a significantly lower restenosis rate of 20.9% as compared with 29.9% in the control group (P = 0.033). Patients that met IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement had a larger minimal lumen diameter immediately after stent implantation (3.13 +/- 0.44 vs. 2.95 +/- 0.47 mm; P = 0.045) and at 6-month follow-up (2.23 +/- 0.78 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.76 mm; P = 0.019) as well as a significantly lower restenosis rate (13.5% vs. 28.3%; P = 0.038) as compared with patients that did not fulfil these criteria. Our data suggest that patients fulfilling IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement demonstrate a reduced risk for the development of restenosis. Thus, IVUS investigation identifies factors predictive of restenosis after coronary stent placement.     

Coronary stents: In vitro aspects of an angiographic and ultrasound quantification with in vivo correlation

BACKGROUND: The validity of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) after stent placement has been questioned because the optical density of a metallic stent, added to the density of a contrast-filled lumen, could affect border definition. METHODS and RESULTS: We deployed 3.0- and 4.0-mm Palmaz-Schatz, Wiktor, Multilink, NIR, and InStent stents in precision-cast phantoms. Central lumens of 2.0 mm were created. There was no difference between the "true" diameters of any stented lumen by both QCA and quantitative ultrasonic (QCU) measurement poststenting. QCA systematic error (SE) varied from 0.01 for the Wiktor stents to 0.14 mm for the Palmaz-Schatz stents; the random error (RE) was 0.03 to 0.14 mm. QCU SE varied from 0.05 to 0.11 mm, and RE ranged from 0.01 to 0.07 mm. At the next stage, 4.0-mm Wiktor and Palmaz-Schatz stents were deployed into the phantom lumens; 1.5-, 2.0-, 2.5- and 3.0-mm lumens were created inside the stents. QCA and QCU measurements of 1.5- to 2.5-mm residual lumens were overestimated by 0.1 to 0.3 mm. In the 3. 0-mm residual lumen within the Wiktor stent, QCA underestimated the luminal size by -0.1 mm. There was no QCA inaccuracy for a 3.0-mm lumen within the Palmaz-Schatz stent. In patients, in 25 stented segments in both the Palmaz-Schatz and Wiktor groups, there was no difference between QCA and QCU diameters. CONCLUSIONS: QCU is sufficiently precise for the assessment of the coronary lumen after stenting. QCA can be used as an accurate method of poststent assessment, except when a very mild recurrence within a highly opaque stent is measured. In that instance, QCA may underestimate the luminal diameter.     

Treatment of ostial lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery with Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent

We evaluated acute and long-term clinical and angiographic results of elective Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation for left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) ostial stenosis in 23 consecutive patients. Eight patients had stable angina, 14 had unstable angina, and 1 had recent myocardial infarction. Sixteen patients had single-vessel, 5 had double-vessel, and 2 had triple-vessel disease. Clinical success without major complications (death, acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting) was obtained in all cases and technical success in 20 cases (86.9%). After stenting, minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.05 +/- 0.45 mm to 2.89 +/- 0.52 mm (p < 0.001), and percent diameter stenosis decreased from 65.49% +/- 13.36% to 2.94% +/- 19.93% (p < 0.001). One case of subacute thrombosis and no major bleeding occurred. Twenty patients were followed-up for 6 months, during which no acute cardiac event (death, acute myocardial infarction) was observed. Eighteen patients were eligible for follow-up coronary angiography; restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) was observed in 4 (22.2%). Minimal lumen diameter was 1.77 +/- 0.55 mm, percent diameter stenosis was 39.66% +/- 17.62%, late loss was 1.01 +/- 0.69 mm, net gain was 0.79 +/- 0.55 mm, and loss index (late loss/acute gain) was 0.53 +/- 0.37. This study suggests that elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and successful treatment of LAD ostial lesions and provides a large increase in lumen diameter.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA in the rat prostate: detection and quantitation by competitive reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

Conventional balloon angioplasty treatment of aorto-ostial stenoses in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts is associated with a low primary success rate, a high complication rate and a high incidence of restenosis. The short-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions was compared with that of balloon angioplasty. Thirteen patients underwent stent implantation for 13 de novo lesions (four in the left main coronary trunk, two in the right coronary artery, seven in the vein graft) between January 1994 and December 1995. Fourteen patients underwent balloon angioplasty for 14 de novo lesions (five in the left main coronary trunk, four in the right coronary artery, five in the vein graft between January 1986 and April 1992. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Initial success was obtained in all patients in the stent group, compared with 71% of the balloon angioplasty group. Insufficient dilation was the main cause for such failure in the balloon angioplasty group. Baseline reference diameters were similar (3.40 +/- 0.65 mm in the stent group vs 3.36 +/- 0.42 mm in the balloon angioplasty group) and there was no difference in baseline minimal luminal diameter (1.41 +/- 0.74 vs 1.08 +/- 0.56 mm). Minimal luminal diameter was significantly greater in the stent group than in the balloon angioplasty group at both post-procedure and follow-up examinations (post: 3.36 +/- 0.58 vs 2.69 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.01; follow-up: 2.33 +/- 0.96 vs 1.52 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05). There was no subacute occlusion in either group. The overall angiographic restenosis rate (> 50% stenosis) was lower in the stent group (17%) than in the balloon angioplasty group: the restenosis rates of native lesions were 0% in the stent group and 40% in the balloon angioplasty group; those of saphenous vein graft lesions were 33% in the stent group and 50% in the balloon angioplasty group. Although the number of patients was limited, these results suggest that Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and effective strategy for treating aorto-ostial lesions in both native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.     

Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.     

Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)

OBJECTIVES: A study was set up to validate the safety and feasibility of intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting without subsequent anticoagulation, and its impact on the 6 months restenosis rate. METHODS: The study was designed to be multicentred, prospective, and observational. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients with stable angina and a de novo coronary artery lesion were enrolled. In four patients, the implantation of a Palmaz-Schatz (with spiral bridge) stent had failed. One of these four patients died 3 days following bypass surgery. In two other patients, intravascular ultrasound assessment was not performed. One hundred and twenty-five of the remaining 155 patients (81%) were treated with aspirin (100 mg x day(-1)), because all three criteria for optimized stent expansion were met. Twenty-two of the remaining 38 patients (25%), in whom at least one criterion was not met were treated with aspirin and acenocoumarol (3 months, INR 2.5-3.5), while 16 patients only received aspirin. Stent thrombosis was documented in two patients (1.3%) for which repeat angioplasty was performed. During the hospital stay, there were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions. Five patients (3.2%) sustained a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. During the follow-up period (198+/-38 days, complete for all patients, except one), one patient (0.6%) sustained a Q-wave myocardial infarction, one (0.6%) underwent bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty was performed in nine patients (5.7%). In two of the nine patients, repeat angioplasty involved another lesion. Therefore, the target lesion revascularization rate during follow-up was 4.5% (seven patients). At quantitative coronary angiography, the minimal lumen diameter (mean+/-SD) increased from 1.12+/-0.34 mm before to 2.89+/-0.35 mm after stenting. Repeat angiography at 6 months was performed in 144 patients (92%). The minimal lumen diameter at follow-up was 2.12+/-0.67 mm. Restenosis (diameter stenosis of 50% or more) was documented in 12 patients or 8.3%. When the two patients with documented stent thrombosis are included, the restenosis rate amounts to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that, in selected patients, stents can safely be implanted without the use of systemic anticoagulation, provided optimal stent expansion is achieved. The exact role of intravascular ultrasound in the achievement of these results needs to be established by appropriately designed studies. In the meantime, intravascular ultrasound coupled with the Palmaz-Schatz stent incorporating a spiral bridge, may have contributed considerably to the immediate angiographic outcome, which in turn may explain the favourable clinical and angiographic outcome at 6 months.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

Balloon-expandable stent repair of severe coarctation of aorta

Experimental studies have shown that stents implanted at the aorta become incorporated within the aortic wall and can be further expanded in growing animals. This study evaluates the feasibility and immediate results of balloon-expandable stent implantation in 10 patients with severe coarctation of aorta. The ages of the patients ranged from 1 month to 43 years; 1 was an infant, 8 were children (mean age 5.3 +/- 4 years), and 1 was an adult. All had an unfavorable anatomy for balloon angioplasty; 9 had isthmus hypoplasia. Balloon predilation was first performed and its immediate effect evaluated. Then a balloon-expandable stent that was 30 mm long and covered the isthmus and coarctation levels was deployed, and it was further expanded to the preselected final diameter (12 +/- 4 mm). A final hemodynamic and angiographic evaluation was then obtained. Full deployment of an incompletely expanded and distally displaced stent in the infant led to aortic disruption that was controlled by a second stent covering the disrupted zone and the isthmus. After balloon angioplasty alone was done, the mean gradient (43 +/- 12 vs 31 +/- 10 mm Hg) and the percentage stenosis (72% +/- 11% vs 54% +/- 11%) had an insufficient decrease. However, after stent implantation was done, the gradient almost disappeared (mean 2 +/- 3 mm Hg). The angiographic stenosis disappeared in 7 patients and was markedly reduced in 3. The ratio of isthmus/descending aorta changed from 0.65 +/- 0.14 to 1 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Validation of the in vivo intravascular ultrasound measurement of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia volumes

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to validate the in vivo intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurement of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (IH) volumes. BACKGROUND: Because stents reduce restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty, stent use has increased significantly. As a result, in-stent restenosis is now an important clinical problem. Serial IVUS studies have shown that in-stent restenosis is secondary to intimal hyperplasia. To evaluate strategies to reduce in-stent restenosis, accurate measurement of in-stent neointimal tissue is important. METHODS: Using a porcine coronary artery model of in-stent restenosis, single Palmaz-Schatz stents were implanted into 16 animals with a stent:artery ratio of 1.3:1. Intravascular ultrasound imaging was performed at 1 month, immediately prior to animal sacrifice. In vivo IVUS and ex vivo histomorphometric measurements included stent, lumen and IH areas; IH volumes were calculated with Simpson's rule. RESULTS: Intravascular ultrasound measurements of IH (30.4+/-11.0 mm3) volumes correlated strongly with histomorphometric measurements (26.7+/-8.5 mm3, r=0.965, p < 0.0001). The difference between the IVUS and the histomorphometric measurements of IVUS volume was 4.1+/-2.7 mm3 or 15.8+/-11% (standard error of the estimate=0.7). Both histomorphometry and IVUS showed that IH was concentric and uniformly distributed over the length of the stent. Intravascular ultrasound detected neointimal thickening of < or =0.2 mm in 5 of 16 stents. Sample size calculations based on the IVUS measurement of IH volumes showed that 12 stented lesions/arm would be required to show a 50% reduction in IVUS-measured IH volume and 44 stented lesions/arm would be required to show a 25% reduction in IH volume. CONCLUSION: In vivo IVUS measurement of IH volumes correlated strongly with ex vivo histomorphometry. Using volumetric IVUS end points, small sample sizes should be necessary to demonstrate effectiveness of strategies to reduce in-stent restenosis.     

Bovine endometrial retinol-binding protein secretion, messenger ribonucleic acid expression, and cellular localization during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and efficacy of stent placement in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and renal artery stenoses, which are difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Preliminary experience with stent placement suggests improved results over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Balloon-expandable stents were placed in 100 consecutive patients (133 renal arteries) with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Sixty-seven of the patients had unilateral renal artery stenosis treated and 33 had bilateral renal artery stenoses treated with stents placed in both renal arteries. RESULTS: Angiographic success, as determined by quantitative angiography, was obtained in 132 (99%) of 133 lesions. Early clinical success was achieved in 76% of the patients. Six months after stent placement, the systolic blood pressure was reduced from 173 +/- 25 to 147 +/- 23 mm Hg (p < 0.001); the diastolic pressure from 88 +/- 17 to 76 +/- 12 mm Hg (p < 0.001); and the mean number of antihypertensive medications per patient from 2.6 +/- 1 to 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8.7 +/- 5.0 months in 67 patients revealed restenosis (>50% diameter narrowing) in 15 (19%) of 80 stented vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is an effective treatment for renovascular hypertension, with a low angiographic restenosis rate. Stent placement appears to be a very attractive therapy in patients with lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty such as renal aorto-ostial lesions and restenotic lesions, as well as after a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result.