Levels of Abstraction in Orangutan (Pongo abelii) Categorization.

Levels of abstraction have rarely been manipulated in studies of natural concept formation in nonhumans. Isolated examples have indicated that animals, relative to humans, may learn concepts at varying levels of abstraction with differential ease. The ability of 6 orangutans (Pongo abelii) of various ages to make natural concept discriminations at 3 levels of abstraction was therefore investigated. The orangutans were rewarded for selecting photos of orangutans instead of humans and other primates (concrete level), primates instead of other animals (intermediate level), and animals instead of nonanimals (abstract level) in a 2-choice touch screen procedure. The results suggest that, like a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) tested previously (Vonk & MacDonald, 2002), orangutans can learn concepts at each level of abstraction, and unlike other nonhumans, most of these subjects rapidly learned the intermediate level discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young, middle-aged, and older adult orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii and Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus).

The ability to select the larger of two quantities ranging from 1 to 5 (relative numerousness judgment [RNJ[) and the ability to select the larger of two pairs of quantities with each pair ranging from 1 to 8 (summation) were evaluated in young, middle-aged, and older adult orangutans (7 Pongo pygmaeus abelii and 2 Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus). Summation accuracy and RNJ were similar to those of previous reports in apes; however, the pattern of age-related differences with regard to these tasks was different from that previously reported in gorillas. Older orangutans were less accurate than the young and middle-aged for RNJ, and summation accuracy was equivalent among age groups. Evidence was found to suggest that the young and middle-aged based their selection of the largest quantity pair on both quantities within each pair during the summation task. These results show a relationship between subject age and the quantitative abilities of adult orangutans. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Gorillas' (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) spatial memory in a foraging task.

The spatial memory of 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) was explored in a simulated foraging task. Trials consisted of 2 parts separated by a delay. In the 1st part, half of the total number of food sites were baited with a highly preferred food, and the subject was allowed to search, find, and consume these items (search phase). During the delay the same locations were again baited. After the delay the animal was reintroduced to the test enclosure and allowed to search through the sites again (re-search phase). In Exp 1, an adult gorilla was very accurate in remembering locations that had previously contained food at delay intervals of 24 hrs or more. In Exp 2, a juvenile gorilla was also accurate in remembering locations that had previously contained food at delays up to 10 min. The adult gorilla appeared to use a counting strategy during the search phase to minimize the number of sites visited. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Response strategies inlist learning by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus × P. abelii).

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) develop strategies to acquire and execute serial lists (K. B. Swartz & S. A. Himmanen, 2001). Serial probe recognition studies of list memory have demonstrated similarities across monkeys and humans (S. F. Sands & A. A. Wright, 1980). The present study extended the investigation of list learning and memory to determine whether orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus × P. abelii) would show evidence of subjective organization of photographic lists in a manner similar to that shown by humans learning a list of unrelated words (E. Tulving, 1962). No evidence for the effective use of a subjective organization strategy was found, but the orangutans developed a right-to-left spatial response strategy, which emerged during the acquisition of 5-item lists. This strategy was an effective way to reduce the load on working memory when presented with a complex array of items. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task: Win-stay versus win-shift strategies.

The spatial memory of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) was explored in 3 experiments with a simulated foraging task. In Experiment 1, individual monkeys foraged among 8 baited food sites. They appeared to use spatial memory to accurately avoid revisiting previously depleted sites. There was no difference in accuracy between the adult monkeys and a juvenile monkey tested on the same task. In Experiment 2, a win–stay paradigm was used. The adult monkey subject very accurately remembered locations that had previously contained food. The monkey tended to visit adjacent correct sites when retrieving food and thus minimized the total distance travelled. In Experiment 3, a win–shift paradigm was used with 2 adult monkeys. Although both monkeys performed at above-chance levels of accuracy on the win–shift task, they made many errors. These results suggest that marmosets may prefer tasks that require a win–stay strategy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Yellow-nosed monkeys' (Cercopithecus ascanius whitesidei) spatial memory in a simulated foraging environment.

The spatial memory abilities of 2 yellow-nosed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius whitesidei), residents in a zoo, were studied in a simulated foraging environment. In the main phases of the study, trials consisted of 2 parts separated by a delay. In the 1st part, 4 food sites were baited with a highly preferred food, and the Ss were permitted to find and consume these items. During the delay, either the same 4 locations were again baited (win-stay problem) or 4 new locations were baited (win-shift problem). The monkeys were very accurate in finding food when they were reintroduced to the test enclosure after the delay, on both types of problem, and with delay intervals of up to 1 hr. In recovering food items the Ss minimized total distance travelled between the sites, which suggests that some species of monkeys, like some species of apes, may use a least-distance strategy in spatial memory tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An obedient orangutan (Pongo abelii) performs perfectly in peripheral object-choice tasks but fails the standard centrally presented versions.

Mulcahy and Call (2009) found that bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) perform significantly better in a peripheral version of the object-choice task compared to the original central version. Orangutans may have failed because they avoided direct eye contact with the experimenter when the cue was given. We investigated this possibility by conducting peripheral and central object choice tasks with an obedient orangutan (Pongo abelii) whom the experimenter could elicit eye contact with in each trial. In contrast to Mulcahy and Call's findings, the subject only failed the object choice task when tested with the central and not the peripheral version. We investigated whether success was because of the greater distance the subject was required to move in order to make a choice in peripheral trials. Results show that this was an unlikely factor in the subject's success. We discuss our findings in relation to previous and future object-choice research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Searching in the middle—Capuchins’ (Cebus apella) and bonobos’ (Pan paniscus) behavior during a spatial search task.

In this study we show that bonobos and capuchin monkeys can learn to search in the middle of a landmark configuration in a small-scale space. Five bonobos (Pan paniscus) and 2 capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were tested in a series of experiments with the expansion test paradigm. The primates were trained to search in the middle of a 4- or 2-landmark configuration, and were then tested with the same configuration expanded. Neither species searched in the middle of the expanded 4-landmark configuration. When presented with a 2-landmark configuration and a constant or variable inter-landmark training distance, the subjects sometimes searched preferentially in the middle of the expanded configuration. We discuss 2 alternative explanations of the results: extracting a middle rule or averaging between different goal-landmark vectors. In any case, compared to adult humans, primates appear highly constrained in their abilities to search in the middle of a configuration of detached landmarks. We discuss some of the factors that may influence the primates’ behavior in this task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

How orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) innovate for water.

We report an observational field study that aimed to identify innovative processes in rehabilitant orangutans’ (Pongo pygmaeus) water innovations on Kaja Island, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. We tested for the basic model of innovating (make small changes to old behavior), 4 contributors (apply old behavior to new ends, accidents, independent working out, social cross-fertilization), development, and social rank. Focal observations of Kaja rehabilitants’ behavior over 20 months yielded 18 probable innovations from among 44 water variants. We identified variants by function and behavioral grain, innovations by prevalence, and innovative processes by relations between innovations, other behaviors, and social encounters. Findings indicate innovating by small changes and some involvement of all 4 contributors; midrank orangutans were the most innovative; and rehabilitants’ adolescent age profile, orphaning, and intense sociality probably enhanced innovativeness. Important complexities include: orangutan innovating may favor certain behavioral levels and narrowly defined similarities, and it may constitute a phase-like process involving a succession of changes and contributors. Discussion focuses on links with great ape cognition and parallels with innovating in humans and other nonhuman species. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparative assessment of handedness for a coordinated bimanual task in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task were assessed in a sample of 31 captive gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and 19 captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and were compared with chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) hand preferences in subjects that were matched on the basis of age, sex, and rearing history. The task required that the apes remove food from the inside edges of a symmetrical polyvinyl chloride pipe presented to them in their home cages. The results indicate significant species differences with chimpanzees showing population-level right-handedness and orangutans showing population-level left-handedness. The gorillas showed a nonsignificant trend toward right-handedness. The results are discussed in terms of possible ecological or biomechanical factors that may influence hand preferences in different ape species. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.

The object-choice task tests animals’ ability to use human-given cues to find a hidden reward located in 1 of 2 (or more) containers. Great apes are generally unskillful in this task whereas other species including dogs (Canis familiaris) and goats (Capra hircus) can use human-given cues to locate the reward. However, great apes are typically positioned proximal to the containers when receiving the experimenter’s cue whereas other species are invariably positioned distally. The authors investigated how the position of the subject, the human giving the cue and the containers (and the distance among them) affected the performance of 19 captive great apes. Compared to the proximal condition, the distal condition involved larger distances and, critically, it reduced the potential ambiguity of the cues as well as the strong influence that the sight of the containers may have had when subjects received the cue. Subjects were far more successful in the distal compared to the proximal condition. The authors suggest several possibilities to account for this difference and discuss our findings in relation to previous and future object-choice research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Posture and reaching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Hand preference in reaching was assessed under 2 postural adjustment conditions in 40 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 6 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). The postural conditions were quadrupedal and upright, during which reaching for food was scored on a minimum of 50 trials. Results indicated no population preference during quadrupedal reaching, but a right-hand population preference was found during upright reaching. There were no significant effects of age or sex on either the direction or strength of hand preference. Early rearing history affected the strength of hand preference but not direction. The results suggest that posture is an important factor in the assessment of hand preference in great apes and may have important evolutionary consequences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Liquid conservation in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and humans (Homo sapiens): Individual differences and perceptual strategies.

Four orangutans (1 juvenile, 2 subadults, and 1 adult) and 10 6–8-yr-old children were tested in 4 liquid conservation tasks of increasing levels of difficulty. Task difficulty depended on the type of transformation (continuous vs discontinuous quantities) and the relative contrast between the shapes of the containers. Results indicate that orangutans did not display conservation in the strict sense; instead they showed "partial" conservation (intermediate reactions according to J. Piaget & B. Inhelder, 1941). In contrast, some of the children provided evidence of conservation in all 4 tasks, showing "true" or logically necessary conservation in the original sense proposed by J. Piaget and B. Inhelder (1941). Although orangutans did not show conservation in the strict sense, as J. Piaget (1955) and others have generally agreed it should be defined, orangutans behaved as individual and creative problem solvers, adopting different perceptual strategies depending on the task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).

The authors tested orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) on object permanence tasks. In Experiment 1, orangutans solved all visible displacements and most invisible displacements except those involving movements into 2 boxes successively. In Experiment 2, performance of orangutans on double invisible displacements and control displacements (assessing simple strategies) was compared. Orangutans did not use the simple strategy of selecting the box visited last by the experimenter. Instead, poorer performance on double invisible displacements may have been related to increased memory requirements. In Experiment 3, squirrel monkeys were tested using the procedure of Experiment 1. Squirrel monkeys solved visible but did not comprehend invisible displacements. Results suggest that orangutans but not squirrel monkeys possess Stage 6 object permanence capabilities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Performance by individual animals of three species of great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, and Pongo pygmaeus) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) was assessed by presenting a food treat inside a clear tube. The subjects readily used a straight stick to obtain the food. When sticks were bundled together, the apes immediately unwrapped the bundle to obtain an individual stick, whereas capuchins attempted to insert the bundled sticks. When a misshapen stick was provided, apes, but not capuchins, showed an improvement in terms of modifying the misshapen stick before insertion. Our results indicate that all these species can solve these tasks. However, only the performance of apes is consistent with emerging comprehension of the causal relations required for the avoidance of errors in the more complex tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Spatial memory of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) for hidden objects in a detour task.

Spatial memory of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) for hidden objects was investigated via a visible displacement problem of object permanence with a detour paradigm. Experiment 1 showed that dogs were able to spontaneously locate a disappearing object in a detour situation. In Experiments 2 and 3, dead reckoning and allocentric spatial information were put in conflict. Results revealed that dogs simultaneously encoded both sources of information when they had to bypass an obstacle to locate a hidden object. Experiment 3 also revealed that, over the course of testing, dogs gradually learned to rely predominantly on allocentric cues when the detour involved several reorientations. The current study reveals that spatial memory of dogs for hidden objects in a detour task was guided by flexibility in processing spatial information. Dogs could simultaneously encode dead reckoning and allocentric information to locate a disappearing object and used them hierarchically according to the complexity of the detour they encountered in the environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cooperative behavior of laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) in an instrumental task.

Cooperation is a cognitively demanding, complex social behavior, found primarily in primates. Here we investigated mutualism in rats (Rattus Norvegicus), a simple form of cooperation in which two subjects work on operant task, receiving immediate and simultaneous sucrose reward for a joint action. To receive the sucrose reward, familiar pairs of rats were required to nose poke simultaneously. Following 44 training days, we examined the relation of social contact and ultrasonic vocalizations to the rat's cooperative behavior by testing the effects of inserting opaque, wire-mesh, or no partition - between subjects. Cooperative behavior (simultaneous nose-poking): (a) increased gradually during initial training; (b) decreased with the opaque partition (restricting visual, acoustic, and physical communication); (c) increased with a wire mesh partition restricting only physical contact); and (d) increased with the number of 50 kHz USV “happy” calls and the intensity of social interaction. The possibility of studying the development of cooperative behavior in laboratory rats using a simple procedure based on commercially available equipment may prove useful in modeling determinants of social behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Imitation in free-ranging rehabilitant orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Made an observational study of spontaneous imitation in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Previous studies may have underestimated great apes' imitative capacities by studying Ss under inhibiting conditions. Ss living in enriched environments (i.e., rehabilitation) were used. A sample of spontaneous imitations was collected, and the most complex incidents were analyzed for the likelihood that true imitation, learning new actions by observing rather than by doing, was involved in their acquisition. From 395 hrs of observation and other reports on 26 orangutans, 354 incidents of imitation were identified. Of these, 54 complex incidents were difficult to explain by forms of imitation based on associative processes grounded in experimental learning alone; they were, however, congruent with acquisition processes that include true imitation. These findings suggest that orangutans may be capable of true imitation and point to critical eliciting factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Plasticity of foraging behavior in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) reared on different diets.

The ontogeny of foraging was studied in 107 neonatal garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) reared on 3 different diets: fish, leafworms, or mixed. Times to approach, capture, handle, and swallow prey were measured during each snake's first feeding and again after 11 to 12 meals. Overall times to consume prey decreased between the first and last tests for the 3 groups, but both prey type and the relative amounts of prey consumed differentially affected the various feeding phases. Approach latencies significantly decreased for snakes fed worms or fish exclusively but not for the mixed-diet snakes. The degrees to which capturing and swallowing latencies decreased differed among diet groups. Diet had little effect on prey handling duration. Sex and litter effects were reduced after feeding experience. These results reveal flexibility in feeding behavior as well as the costs and benefits of experience with multiple prey classes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)