Problems with parsimony in sequences of biased base composition

In almost all eradication regimens, which contain antibiotics and bismuth derivatives, the administration of acid suppressing drugs for 4-6 weeks is recommended for healing of duodenal ulcer. The aim of this multicenter double blind study is to elucidate the effect of two classic antibiotics tetracycline (CAS 60-54-8) and metronidazole (CAS 443-48-1) alone or combined with ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) on the healing of duodenal ulcer and eradication of Helicobacter Pylori. Patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized to two treatment groups: group A received either ranitidine 4 x 150 mg or tetracycline 4 x 500 mg or metronidazole 3 x 250 mg for 2 weeks. Group B received 4 x placebo + tetracycline and metronidazole as in group A for 2 weeks. A final endoscopy was performed after 8 weeks. Four biopsy specimens were obtained from the antrum (two) and corpus (two) for both urease test and hematoxylin stain for detection of H. pylori. Out of 201 patients entering the study 156 completed the study (78 in A and 78 in B). The healing rate of duodenal ulcer was 98.7% in group A and 97.5 in group B. The eradication rate was only 33.3% in group B but 64% in group A (p < 0.001), when additionally ranitidine was given. The present study shows that treatment with the two antibiotics tetracycline and metronidazole alone results in a very low H. pylori eradication, but almost complete healing of duodenal ulcer after 8 weeks. Prolonged administration of antisecretory drugs in eradication regimens containing two antibiotics is not necessary for duodenal ulcer healing. However, the addition of H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors to antibiotics increases the eradication rate.     

CT in Fournier''s gangrene

BACKGROUND: Few outcome studies directly compare Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with maintenance H2-antagonist therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. AIM: To examine prospectively the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy with ranitidine maintenance therapy over 1 year in patients with confirmed chronic duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with active H. pylori infection were randomized to receive ranitidine, 150 mg/day initially (58 patients), or omeprazole, 40 mg/day, amoxycillin 2 g/day and metronidazole 1.2 g/day for 14 days, or omeprazole 40 mg/day and clarithromycin 1.5 g/day, for 14 days (if penicillin-allergic). Symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale (GSRS) and SF36 quality of life index. RESULTS: 13C urea breath testing confirmed overall treatment success in 100% of patients (58/58) per protocol and 95.1% (58/61) on an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 and 12 months there were no differences in any GSRS symptoms between treatment groups. SF36 analysis showed a perceived health improvement at 4 and 12 months in patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, despite successful H. pylori eradication, one-fifth of patients still required antisecretory therapy. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, chronic duodenal ulcer patients were at least as well symptomatically as when taking maintenance ranitidine. They perceived that their health had improved, but a subgroup was still acid-suppression dependent.     

One-week use of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been widely used in combination with amoxycillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To study the effects of 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. METHOD: Patients with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were prospectively randomized to receive either RBC with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (RAC), or omeprazole with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (OAC). No additional ulcer healing drug was used after the 1-week medication. Patients were assessed for H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and side-effects after receiving the therapies. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were recruited to this study, with 50 patients randomized to each treatment group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, duodenal ulcers were completely healed in 45 (90%) patients in the RAC group and 43 (89.6%) in the OAC group (P = 1.0). H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 47 (94%) in the RAC group and 42 (87.5%) in the OAC group (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the severity of side-effects experienced by the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: One-week RBC-based triple therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. The therapeutic effects are comparable to a 1-week course of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.     

One-week therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole or ornidazole, followed by 3 weeks' treatment with omeprazole, eradicates Helicobacter pylori equally and heals duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the efficacy of 'triple' 1-week regimens--omeprazole, clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (metronidazole or ornidazole)--followed by omeprazole, for an additional 3 weeks, on Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer (DU) healing, in a country with a high resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole. DESIGN: Open, prospective, two-centre study. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with active duodenal ulcer (DU), diagnosed by endoscopy and found to be infected with H. pylori (modified Giemsa stain and CLO test, Delta West, Australia), were included in the study. Three triple-drug regimens, given for 7 days, were used. (1) omeprazole (Om) 20 mg once a day, plus clarithromycin (Cl) 250 mg twice daily, plus ornidazole (Or) 500 mg twice daily (O1COr); (2) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus Or 500 mg twice daily (OCOr); and (3) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus metronidazole (M) 500 mg twice daily (OCM). Two hundred and three consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were included in the study, randomly assigned as follows: 50 patients (group A1: 32 men, 18 women, age 23-77 years) on O1COr; 47 patients (group A2: 29 men, 18 women, age 27-77 years) on OCOr; and 106 (group B: 71 men, 35 women, age 18-83 years) on OCM. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed endoscopically, 8-9 weeks after the start of treatment. H. pylori was considered eradicated if both histology and rapid urease test (six biopsies, antrum-body) were negative. RESULTS: Eleven patients were lost to follow-up; 192 patients were analysed. Group A1: 48; group A2: 44; group B: 100. 'Per-protocol' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 90-93% (P = 0.901); ulcer healing, 90-98% (P = 0.300). 'Intention to treat' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 85-88% (P = 0.887); ulcer healing, 86-91% (P = 0.657). Compliance was excellent, no serious side effects were observed and no patients withdrew due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the H. pylori eradication and the healing rate among the groups. It seems that twice daily omeprazole is no better than single daily dosage and that ornidazole is as effective as metronidazole. In addition, in the studied population which is believed to have a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, all the regimens used were effective.     

One-week antibiotics versus maintenance acid suppression therapy for Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer bleeding

Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Our aim was to compare the effect of anti-Helicobacter therapy with maintenance treatment of H2-receptor antagonist in the prevention of relapses of ulcer and bleeding. Patients with bleeding duodenal or gastric ulcers and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either a one-week course of triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline plus ranitidine or a six-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day. After the ulcers healed, the antibiotic-treated patients were not given any medication, whereas the ranitidine-treated patients continued to receive a maintenance dose of 150 mg/day. One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized to receive anti-Helicobacter therapy and 124 patients to receive long-term ranitidine. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 98.2% in those who received triple therapy and 6.1% in those who received ranitidine (P < 0.0001). At the six-week follow-up, ulcer healing was documented in 88.2% in those who received triple therapy and 86.1% in those who received ranitidine (P = 0.639). Recurrent ulcer developed in nine of the ranitidine-treated patients and three of them presented with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient in the antibiotic group developed recurrent ulcer without rebleeding (P = 0.01). It is concluded that eradication of H. pylori is sufficient for the prevention of recurrent bleeding ulcers.     

Does smoking influence the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and duodenal ulcer healing with different regimens?

To determine the effect of smoking on Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing, we investigated 232 patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer. Patients were given one of seven different treatment protocols and divided into three groups according to smoking habits. Group 1 (n = 128) consisted of non-smokers, group 2 (n = 65) of mild smokers (5-20 cigarettes/day) and group 3 (n = 39) of heavy smokers (> 20/day). The eradication of H. pylori and ulcer healing rate was controlled eight weeks later after ceasing the therapy. The overall eradication rate was 66% in all patients and 68%, 66%, 59% in each group, respectively. The eradication rates showed no statistical difference between groups. Complete ulcer healing was achieved in 84% of all patients and ulcer healing rate between groups did not show any significance (85%, 83% and 82% respectively). These results suggest that smoking status does not influence the eradication of H. pylori and duodenal ulcer healing rates at eight weeks in patients on different treatment schedules.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing with daily lansoprazole, plus 1 or 2 weeks co-therapy with amoxycillin and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor based combination therapy is one standard strategy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the eradication and duodenal ulcer healing efficacy of two 2-week, single dose, lansoprazole based combination therapies. METHODS: Healthy adult patients with endoscopically confirmed, H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease (3 mm > ulcer < 20 mm) were eligible for the study. All patients received a 14 day course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., and were randomized to receive either 7 or 14 days of amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Patients were endoscoped at entry and 14-17 days later. Symptomatic, unhealed patients received a further 14 days of therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. Eradication was confirmed a minimum of 28 days after cessation of all therapy by urease reaction and histological assessment of gastric body and antral biopsies (three biopsies each site). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to a treatment arm, of which 58 could be included in an intention-to-treat and key-point-available analysis. H. pylori eradication rates were identical, at 93% (95% CI: 73-98% (1 week), 78-99% (2 week)). In the combined group, all but 13 ulcers were healed at 2 weeks; six required further therapy because of symptoms, while six of the seven asymptomatic patients went on to heal. CONCLUSION: An eradication regimen, based on a 2-week course of single dose lansoprazole with 1 week of antibiotic co-therapy, is effective in eradicating H. pylori, while the 2 weeks of acid suppression is usually effective in duodenal ulcer healing.     

New one-week, low-dose triple therapy for the treatment of duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial therapy is the recommended treatment for duodenal ulcer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The eradication of bismuth-based triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and amoxicillin is limited by low compliance, drug resistance and side-effects. Two-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has a higher eradication rate but is costly. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, patient compliance and cost of short-term PPI-based triple therapy with those of bismuth-based triple therapy. METHODS: Ninety patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori infection, proven with the 13C-urea breath test and CLO test (Campylobacter-like organism test) were treated randomly in three therapeutic groups: Group A, DeNol 120 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and metronidazole 250 mg four times a day orally for 14 days; Group B, omeprazole 20 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 500 mg four times a day for 14 days; Group C, omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for seven days. Nizatidine 150 mg twice a day was given continuously following the end of anti-H pylori therapy for each group. Two months later, endoscopy, the CLO test and 13C-urea breath test were repeated to assess the eradication rate of H pylori and the ulcer-healing rate. Drug tolerance was evaluated by patients themselves by daily recording of any side-effects. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the entire course of therapy and evaluation for H pylori infection. The H pylori eradication rates in Groups A, B and C were 75% (21/28), 93% (26/28) and 89% (25/28), respectively (p = 0.466). The ulcer healing rate was 86% (24/28) in Group A and 89% (25/28) in Groups B and C (p = 0.764). A total of 74 patients (88%) were free from symptoms at the end of the triple therapy. Symptom relief was faster in patients with PPI-based triple therapy (Groups B and C) (days 3 and 4) than for patients with bismuth-based triple therapy (day 5). The cost of Group C therapy was lower than that for Groups A and B. There were no major side-effects in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effected for the eradication of H pylori. A therapeutic regime of one week's duration with lower cost, good compliance and mild side-effects may offer a good choice for treatment of duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori infection in clinical practice.     

Short-term low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection has been achieved using various therapy regimens, but the efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor pantoprazole as part of these regimens has not yet been widely tested. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 1-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer. METHODS: In an open single-centre prospective study, 71 patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection received pantoprazole 40 mg o.m. for 4 weeks, and during the first week a combination antimicrobial treatment comprising tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. H. pylori eradication was defined as concordant negative histology and rapid urease test performed at endoscopy 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment, confirmed 4 weeks later by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (93%) completed the trial and five patients were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured in 61 out of the 66 patients who completed the trial (per-protocol analysis: 92.4%, 95% CI: 83.2-97.5%; intention-to-treat analysis: 85.9%, 95% CI: 75.7-93.0%). At final endoscopy, 65 out of 66 patients had healed ulcer (98.5%). Mild adverse events occurred in six patients (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: One-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy is a simple, effective and well-tolerated regimen for ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

Triple therapy with sucralfate is not effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori and does not reduce duodenal ulcer relapse rates

OBJECTIVES: The most used therapeutic schedule to eradicate Helicobacter pylori is the "triple therapy," which is based on the simultaneous use of a bismuth salt and two antibiotics. Sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate, is supposed to have an antibacterial activity and is said to reduce the bacterial density of H. pylori. This randomized, prospective clinical trial compares the efficacy of an alternative oral triple therapy consisting of sucralfate, tinidazol, and tetracycline with a conventional therapy using ranitidine, with respect to H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing and recurrence in a 12-month follow-up. METHODS: Forty-three patients with active duodenal ulcers diagnosed at endoscopy were enrolled to receive either 1 g of sucralfate four times daily for 30 days, 500 mg of tetracycline four times daily, and 500 mg of tinidazol three times daily, for 10 days (group A; n = 23) or 150 mg of ranitidine twice daily for 30 days (group B; n = 20). The groups were age- and sex-matched and balanced for tobacco use and H. pylori status. Compliance assessed by post-treatment interviews was considered high (all patients declared that they had ingested at least 80% of the drugs). RESULTS: Both therapies were efficient in healing ulcers (group A, 95%; group B, 90%), the relapse rates were high in both groups (group A, 77%; group B, 89%), and the alternative triple therapy eradicated H. pylori in only 4% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Alternative oral triple therapy presented no significant advantage over ranitidine treatment of active ulcer disease.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori reduces the rate of rebleeding in peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether therapy designed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection resulted in a reduction in rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Patients presenting because of major upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from peptic ulcer and whose ulcers healed in a study in which they were randomized to receive ranitidine alone or triple therapy plus ranitidine were followed up regularly with endoscopy. No maintenance anti-ulcer therapy was given after ulcer healing. METHODS: Patients received ranitidine, 300 mg, or ranitidine plus triple therapy. Triple therapy consisted of tetracycline, 2 g; metronidazole, 750 mg; and bismuth subsalicylate, 5 or 8 tablets (151 mg bismuth per tablet), and was administered for the first 2 weeks of treatment; ranitidine therapy was continued until the ulcer had healed or 16 weeks had elapsed. After ulcer healing, no maintenance antiulcer therapy was given. Development of ulcer recurrence with or without recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with major upper gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic ulcer were studied; 17 received triple therapy and 14 ranitidine alone. Major rebleeding occurred significantly (p = 0.031) more often in those in the ranitidine group (28.6%), compared with none (0%) in the triple therapy group. CONCLUSION: Eradication of H. pylori infection reduces the rate of ulcer recurrence and rebleeding in complicated ulcer disease.     

"Eight drugs in one day" chemotherapy in a nonfamilial bilateral retinoblastoma with recurrent cerebrospinal fluid metastases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the addition of bismuth subnitrate to a dual oral therapy regimen with omeprazole plus amoxycillin could improve Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: Fifty consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients were randomly enrolled to receive either (A) bismuth subnitrate (300 mg q.d.s.), omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.), or (B) omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.). Both groups (n=25 each) received the medication for 14 days. H. pylori status was reassessed 30 days after completion of the therapy in order to evaluate eradication rates. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded from the study (three patients from each group). One patient from Group B withdrew from the study because of side-effects. The addition of bismuth subnitrate to omeprazole and amoxycillin significantly improved its efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, with 72% (18/25) eradication in Group A and 52% (13/25) in Group B (P=0.027). The addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy was also capable of improving the healing of peptic ulcers when compared with dual oral therapy alone (100%, 8/8 vs. 58%, 4/7; P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy enhances H. pylori eradication, and improves healing of peptic ulcers.     

Erosive duodenitis: prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and response to eradication therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with erosive duodenitis (ED), the associated gastric histological lesions and their response to eradication therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics. METHODS: A prospective study was made of 57 patients with ED (mean age 46 +/- 16 years, 72% males). At endoscopy, biopsies from gastric antrum and body were obtained for histological study (haematoxylin and eosin). A 13C-urea breath test was also performed. Omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus two antibiotics (amoxycillin 1 g twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, metronidazole 500 mg twice daily) were administered for 1 week. Endoscopy and breath test were repeated 1 month after completing therapy, and the breath test was performed again at 6 months. RESULTS: All patients were H. pylori positive. Overall eradication was achieved in 86% (95% CI 75-93%). Duodenal erosion healing was obtained in 45 patients (79%). Healing was achieved in 86% (CI 73-93%) of cases with successful eradication therapy, but only in 3/8 (37%; CI 8.5-75%) patients with therapy failure (P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, H. pylori eradication was the only variable which correlated with erosion healing (odds ratio 10; CI 2-51; P < 0.01). Histological improvement, in both the gastric antrum and body, was demonstrated when eradication was achieved (P < 0.001). Six months after diagnosis H. pylori absence was confirmed in all patients with initial therapy success (all of them asymptomatic), and infection was confirmed in the eight patients who were H. pylori positive after therapy (six of them symptomatic). At 6-month follow-up, endoscopy was normal in 6/7 H. pylori-negative patients with previously persistent ED, while erosions were still present in 4/5 H. pylori-positive patients with previously persistent ED. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence (100%) of H. pylori infection in patients with ED was observed. A 1-week twice daily therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin plus amoxycillin or metronidazole) was very effective in H. pylori eradication, duodenal erosion healing, symptomatic improvement, and in disappearance of associated histological gastritis. These observations suggest that ED should be considered a variant form of duodenal ulcer disease and treated accordingly; that is, with H. pylori eradication therapy.     

Increase of serum tumor marker concentrations by interferon-alpha

BACKGROUND: The effect of infection by Helicobacter pylori on gastric physiology in duodenal ulcer subjects is controversial. There is evidence that the infection is associated with abnormalities in gastrin homeostasis. Consistent changes in pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretory status have proved difficult to establish. This may be because patients have been studied too soon after Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIMS: To study the immediate and longer term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in duodenal ulcer subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer disease were studied. Ulcers were healed with sucralfate 2 g bd or ranitidine 300 mg nocte. Helicobacter pylori eradication was attempted with bismuth-based "Triple Therapy", and the nine patients in whom the organism was successfully eradicated were followed and studied over the 12-month period. Acid secretion was studied at entry (prior to the initiation of therapy), following healing, following eradication and 12 months later. Basal, low dose (0.1 microgram/kg) and high dose (6 micrograms/kg) pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was determined. RESULTS: Whilst there was a tendency for basal and low dose-stimulated acid secretion to fall following eradication, in this study only the reduction in high dose-stimulated acid secretion achieved significance following eradication (entry mean = 59.6, post eradication mean = 49.6, p < 0.03). This effect of eradication on high dose pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was also seen at the 12-month study (mean = 48.9, p < 0.02 versus entry). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that maximally stimulated acid secretion is modestly, albeit significantly, reduced following Helicobacter pylori eradication and that this effect persists.     

Lansoprazole. An update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. It has proved effective in combination regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and as monotherapy to heal and relieve symptoms of gastric or duodenal ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. After initial healing, it may be used to prevent recurrence of oesophageal erosions or peptic ulcers in patients in whom H. pylori is not the major cause of ulceration and to reduce basal acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages are 15 to 60 mg/day, although dosages of < or = 180 mg/day have been used in patients with hypersecretory states. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, short term lansoprazole monotherapy was similar to omeprazole and superior to histamine H2 receptor antagonists in achieving healing rates > 90%. Lansoprazole was as effective a component of H. pylori eradication regimens as omeprazole, tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) or ranitidine. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in symptom relief and healing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and tended to relieve symptoms more rapidly than omeprazole, although initial healing was similar. As maintenance treatment, lansoprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in relieving symptoms and preventing relapse. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in healing and relieving symptoms of oesophageal erosions associated with Barrett's oesophagus; healing was maintained for a mean of 2.9 years in > or = 70% of patients. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in prophylaxis of redilatation of oesophageal strictures. After > or = 4 years of use in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole 60 to 180 mg/day effectively controlled basal acid output. Dosages may be reduced in some patients once healing and symptom relief has been achieved. Preliminary studies of lansoprazole in patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia or stress ulcers show promise. Although studies show lansoprazole is potentially effective in treating gastrointestinal bleeding, future studies should assess patients' H. pylori status. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, diarrhoea, dizziness and nausea appearing to be the most common adverse effects. Tolerability of lansoprazole does not deteriorate with age and the drug is well tolerated in long term use (< or = 4 years) in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or reflux disease. Thus, lansoprazole is an important alternative to omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in acid-related disorders. In addition to its efficacy in healing or maintenance treatment, it may provide more effective symptom relief than other comparator agents.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the eradication of Helicobacter pylori as treatment for duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer in Spain. METHODS: A decision model was used to compare the cost per cured patient and the cost per patient without recurrence in one year for four treatment strategies: 1) intermittent antisecretory therapy, 2) initial antisecretory therapy and H. pylori eradication if ulcer recurrence, 3) initial H. pylori eradication with antibiotics and antisecretory drugs, 4) antisecretory therapy followed by continuous maintenance therapy with ranitidine. Clinical variables were obtained from published studies made in Spain. RESULTS: Initial H. pylori eradication is the cheapest strategy (74,702-82,028 ptas per cured patient) and the most effective (83.3-85.2% patients without recurrence in one year). Intermittent antisecretory therapy is one of the most expensive (94,891-105,324 ptas per cured patient) and the less effective (12% patients without recurrence in one year). CONCLUSION: Initial eradication of H. pylori is the treatment of choice in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

Low- versus high-dose azithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical trial which evaluated the effectiveness of triple therapy containing low- and high-dose azithromycin to treat Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: From March 1997 to March 1998, patients infected with H. pylori were assigned to receive either: Treatment 1: ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) (400 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g b.d.) for 10 days with azithromycin 500 mg o.m. for 3 days: or Treatment 2: RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days with azithromycin 1 g o.m. for 3 days. H. pylori eradication was established by a urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Side-effects and compliance were assessed using a diary. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven per cent of patients were treated for active peptic ulcer disease or a history of peptic ulcer disease. Treatment 1 cured H. pylori in 44% and 44% by per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. The corresponding eradication rates for Treatment 2 were 79% and 75%. Two patients taking Treatment 2 dropped out of the study because of side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: With RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days, azithromycin at a dose of 1 g/day for 3 days was significantly better at curing H. pylori infection than azithromycin 500 mg/day for 3 days.     

The impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on peptic ulcer healing

OBJECTIVE: Current literature was reviewed analyzing the outcome of peptic ulcer healing in relation to the results of the posttherapeutic Helicobacter pylori (HP) status. METHODS: Literature was reviewed along with an analysis of 60 studies, comprising a total of 4329 patients. RESULTS: Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication was found to induce a better response in peptic ulcer healing, regardless of diagnosis: gastric ulcer 88% vs 73% (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, p < 0.01), duodenal ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 5.6, p < 0.0001), and peptic ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 6.6, p < 0.0001), for patients having their HP infection successfully cured versus those remaining HP-positive, respectively (Fisher's exact test). For all evaluated time points (< or = 6, 7-8, and 10-12 wk after beginning treatment), HP-negative patients had higher healing rates than HP-positive patients (95% vs 82%, 94% vs 69%, and 96% vs 78% with corresponding OR of 4.2, 6.5, and 7.4, all p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). The use of concomitant acid suppression therapy during initial HP eradication provided a benefit on peptic ulcer healing only for patients with persistent HP infection (improved healing rates of 78% vs 67%; otherwise rates were 94-96%). Likewise, prolonged acid inhibition in HP treatment failures after the initial HP treatment phase resulted in 7-20% improved healing rates, whereas patients becoming HP-negative did not profit. CONCLUSION: Successful HP eradication therapy accelerates peptic ulcer healing even without concomitant acid suppression.     

Animal model of human medulloblastoma: clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathological findings after intra-cisternal injection of MHH-MED-1 cells into nude rats

OBJECTIVES: It was our goal to evaluate the efficacy and safety and patient compliance with omeprazole-based dual and triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with H. pylori infection and associated active peptic ulcer were included. H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histological analysis. Patients were randomized among three treatments: group 1 (56 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, for 2 weeks; group 2 (61 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, and metronidazole, 500 mg bid, for 1 week; and group 3 (58 patients): omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, and clarithromycin, 500 mg bid, for 1 week. Ulcer healing and cure of infection were evaluated at 4 to 6 weeks after cessation of therapy. Eradication rate was calculated per-protocol and by an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: At posttreatment endoscopy, duodenal ulcer was healed in 98.3% of patients. Eleven patients (6%) were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was treated successfully in 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41%-69%) of patients of group 1; 86% (95% CI = 77%-95%) of group 2 (p < .001 vs. group 1); and 93% (95% CI = 85%-100%) of group 3 (p < .001 vs. group 1). On intention-to-treat analysis, eradication was 52%, 80%, and 86% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A good compliance was observed in more than 90% of patients of all groups. Side effects were reported by 7% of patients in group 1, 9% in group 2, and 11% in group 3. None of the patients stopped therapy because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-therapy omeprazole-amoxicillin for 2 weeks is associated with significantly lower eradication rate than is 1-week omeprazole-based triple therapies. Triple therapy is well-tolerated and produces side effects similar to those of dual therapy. The highest cure rate of H. pylori infection was achieved with triple therapy of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 1 week.     

Age-dependent eradication of Helicobacter pylori with dual therapy

BACKGROUND: Combined treatment using an acid-inhibiting drug with antibiotics can cure Helicobacter pylori infection. However, eradication rates are highly variable, especially if a proton pump inhibitor is used with amoxycillin. Therefore it is important to define factors/predictors of the clinical outcome. METHODS: In a single-blind study, 60 H. pylori-positive patients prospectively matched for diagnosis (erosive gastritis, duodenal and gastric ulcer), age (above and below 50 years) and smoking habits were randomly treated (each group n = 20) for 2 weeks with amoxycillin (1 mg b.d.) and either omeprazole (20 mg b.d.), lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) or ranitidine (300 mg b.d.). Intragastric pH and plasma levels of the administered drugs were monitored over a dosing interval of 12 h. RESULTS: The overall eradication rates were 45% (intention-to-treat, ITT, 27/60) or 47% (per protocol 27/58); they did not differ (ITT) between omeprazole (50%), lansoprazole (40%) and ranitidine (45%). Median pH and time at which intragastric pH was above 4 was slightly lower for ranitidine (4.0 +/- 1.7; 51 +/- 25%) than for omeprazole (5.4 +/- 1.1: 77 +/- 25%; P < 0.05) or lansoprazole (4.4 +/- 1.6: 68 +/- 32%). Plasma concentrations of amoxycillin were comparable in all three treatment groups. Post-treatment H. pylori status was not dependent on those levels, or the drug-induced extent or duration of increased intragastric pH. However, H. pylori-eradicated patients were significantly (P < 0.05) older (56 +/- 13 years) than patients still H. pylori-positive (47 +/- 14 years). In addition, in patients older than 50 years (n = 33), eradication was higher (P < 0.01) than in patients (n = 25) below 50 years (65 vs. 24%). Eradication rate was highest (75-83%) in subgroups of patients (> 50 years and history of peptic ulcer or smokers). Neither activity/grade of peptic ulcer or erosive gastritis nor initial diagnosis were predictors for clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The age of patients must be regarded as a major determinant of H. pylori eradication rate and may represent an important factor contributing to the highly variable clinical results.