Differential contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to early-onset breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes predispose women to breast cancer. BRCA1 mutations are found in approximately 12 percent of women with breast cancer of early onset, and the specific mutation causing a deletion of adenine and guanine (185delAG), which is present in 1 percent of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, contributes to 21 percent of breast cancers among young Jewish women. The contribution of BRCA2 mutations to breast cancer of early onset is unknown. METHODS: Lymphocyte specimens from 73 women with breast cancer diagnosed by the age of 32 were studied for heterozygous mutations of BRCA2 by a complementary-DNA-based protein-truncation assay, followed by automated nucleotide sequencing. In addition, specimens from 39 Jewish women with breast cancer diagnosed by the age of 40 were tested for specific mutations by an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Definite BRCA2 mutations were found in 2 of the 73 women with early-onset breast cancer (2.7 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 9.6 percent), suggesting that BRCA2 is associated with fewer cases than BRCA1 (P=0.03). The specific BRCA2 mutation causing a deletion of thymine (6174delT), which is found in 1.3 percent of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, was observed in 1 of the 39 young Jewish women with breast cancer (2.6 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09 to 13.5 percent), indicating that it has a small role as a risk factor for early-onset breast cancer. Among young women with breast cancer, there are BRCA2 mutations that cause truncation of the extreme C terminus of the protein and that may be functionally silent, along with definite truncating mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Germ-line mutations in BRCA2 contribute to fewer cases of breast cancer among young women than do mutations in BRCA1. Carriers of BRCA2 mutations may have a smaller increase in the risk of early-onset breast cancer.     

A physical map of two clusters containing the genes for six proinflammatory receptors

The genes encoding for six receptors involved in the proinflammatory response lie on different chromosomes. Two receptors for N-formylpeptides (FPR1, FPR2), one homologue of these (FPRL2), and the receptor for complement fragment C5a (C5aR) are encoded by four genes mapped to human chromosome 19. The genes encoding two receptors for Interleukin-8 (IL8RA, IL8RB) have been located on human chromosome 2. In this report we describe the physical linkage between these genes in two different clusters. DNA fragments obtained by digestion with several restriction enzymes were separated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Nylon filters were hybridized with probes corresponding to the complete translated sequences of these genes. These probes were obtained from a human neutrophil cDNA-library. The four genes on chromosome 19 are contained in a 200 kilobase (kb) fragment. Both Interleukin-8 receptors are on a 150 kb fragment. The complete translated sequences for these genes were amplified from genomic DNA, indicating that they are contained in a single exon.     

Germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a breast and ovarian cancer patient

Nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated as a modulator of the vascular effects of angiotensin II (ANG II) in the kidney. We used a NO-sensitive microelectrode to study the effect of ANG II on NO release, and to determine the effect of selective inhibition of the ANG II subtype I receptor (AT1) with losartan (LOS) and candesartan (CAN). NO release from isolated and perfused renal resistance arteries was measured with a porphyrin-electroplated, carbon fiber. The vessels were microdissected from isolated perfused rat kidneys and perfused at constant flow and pressure in vitro. The NO-electrode was placed inside the glass collection cannula to measure vessel effluent NO concentration. ANG II stimulated NO release in a dose-dependent fashion: 0.1 nM, 10 nM and 1000 nM ANG II increased NO-oxidation current by 85+/-18 pA (n = 11), 148+/-22 pA (n = 11), and 193+/-29 pA (n = 11), respectively. These currents correspond to changes in effluent NO concentration of 3.4+/-0.5 nM, 6.1+/-1.1 nM, and 8.2+/-1.3 nM, respectively. Neither LOS (1 muM) nor CAN (1 nM) significantly affected basal NO production, but both AT1-receptor blockers markedly blunted NO release in response to ANG II (10 nM): 77+/-6% inhibition with LOS (n = 8) and 63+/-9% with CAN (n = 8). These results are the first to demonstrate that ANG II stimulates NO release in isolated renal resistance arteries, and that ANG II-induced NO release is blunted by simultaneous AT1-receptor blockade. Our findings suggest that endothelium-dependent modulation of ANG II-induced vasoconstriction in renal resistance arteries is mediated, at least in part, by AT1-receptor-dependent NO release.     

Effect of BRCA1 and BRCA2 on the association between breast cancer risk and family history

BACKGROUND: The discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 has led to a reassessment of the association between family history of breast/ovarian cancer and breast cancer risk after controlling for carrier status for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We examined whether family history of breast cancer remains a predictive risk factor for this disease after carrier status for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations is taken into consideration. METHODS: The data are from 4730 case subjects with breast cancer and 4688 control subjects enrolled in the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. The probability of being a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene carrier was calculated for each woman. Among predicted noncarriers, logistic regression was used to assess the relationship (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between case or control status and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Estimates of age-specific breast cancer risk are presented by predicted carrier status. RESULTS: Among predicted noncarriers, case subjects were 2.06 times (95% CI = 1.69-2.50) and 1.24 times (95% CI = 1.17-1.32) more likely to report a first-degree or second-degree family history of breast cancer, respectively, than were control subjects. Case subjects were 1.99 times (95% CI = 1.63-2.44), 1.66 times (95% CI = 1.18-2.38), and 2.23 times (95% CI = 0.21-24.65) more likely to report an affected mother, sister, or both, respectively, than were control subjects. A family history of ovarian cancer was not statistically significantly associated with breast cancer risk. Noncarriers were predicted to have a lifetime risk of 9% of developing breast cancer compared with a 63% risk for carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with a moderate family history of breast cancer, i.e., predicted noncarriers of BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations, family history remains a factor in predicting breast cancer risk. In families with breast and ovarian cancers, the aggregation of these two cancers appears to be explained by BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-carrier probability.     

A linkage analysis of D17S74 (CMM86) in thirty-five families with premenopausal bilateral breast cancer

We report here results of a linkage analysis of a marker in 35 families in which the proband had premenopausal bilateral breast cancer. This group is of particular interest given their high family risk and the question of etiological heterogeneity. Probands were ascertained from cancer registries in Los Angeles County and Connecticut and major hospitals in Montréal and Québec. Assuming no residual heterogeneity and summing lod scores over all families, we obtained strong evidence against tight linkage (e.g., lod score at theta = 0.000001 is -3.39). To address the issue of heterogeneity, we performed admixture and predivided sample analyses. Using an admixture model we were able to reject the hypothesis of no linkage versus that of linkage with homogeneity (P = 0.045). However, we were unable to reject the hypothesis of no linkage versus linkage with heterogeneity (P = 0.119) or to distinguish between linkage with homogeneity and linkage with heterogeneity (P = 0.500). Predivided sample analyses based upon age of onset, pathological characteristics, time between diagnoses of the breast cancers in each bilateral proband, and the span of ages at diagnoses within a family did not discriminate between apparently linked and unlinked families.     

Identification of missense and truncating mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic and familial breast and ovarian cancer

Bone loss after oophorectomy of adult rats is more rapid and complete in the metaphysis than in the epiphysis of the femur, particularly in the proximal region of the metaphysis distant from the growth plate. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of prepubertal oophorectomy, on femoral cancellous bone acquisition during growth. Rats were oophorectomized (OVX) or sham operated at 3 weeks of age and killed at intervals up to 78 weeks for scanning electron microscopy and histomorphometry of the distal femur. Differences in cancellous bone architecture between the two groups was evident after 6 weeks of age. Relatively minor differences were found in the part of the metaphysis near the growth plate and in the epiphysis, with less trabeculae in the primary spongiosa and 1 to 2 less trabeculae/mm in the secondary spongiosa. However, as metaphyseal growth proceeded, trabeculae were present for a greater distance up the femoral shaft in controls than in OVX rats, with mean BV/TV in the proximal part of the metaphysis increasing from 1.4% at 6 weeks to 13.4% at 20 weeks in controls, with no increase in the OVX rats. We find that the lack of ovarian hormones increases the rate of destruction of trabeculae near the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.     

Aberrant methylation of the BRCA1 CpG island promoter is associated with decreased BRCA1 mRNA in sporadic breast cancer cells

A series of N-substituted 4-amino-2,2-diphenylbutyramide derivatives was prepared as part of a search for subtype-selective antimuscarinic agents. The representative compound KRP-197, bearing a 2-methylimidazole ring as a surrogate of aliphatic amine, was found to be a highly potent and both M1- and M3-selective antimuscarinic agent.     

BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: To define the incidence of BRCA1 mutations among patients seen in clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer, we analyzed DNA samples from women seen in this setting and constructed probability tables to provide estimates of the likelihood of finding a BRCA1 mutation in individual families. METHODS: Clinical information, family histories, and blood for DNA analysis were obtained from 263 women with breast cancer. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing were used to identify BRCA1 mutations. RESULTS: BRCA1 mutations were identified in 16 percent of women with a family history of breast cancer. Only 7 percent of women from families with a history of breast cancer but not ovarian cancer had BRCA1 mutations. The rates were higher among women from families with a history of both breast and ovarian cancer. Among family members, an average age of less than 55 years at the diagnosis of breast cancer, the presence of ovarian cancer, the presence of breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman, and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry were all associated with an increased risk of detecting a BRCA1 mutation. No association was found between the presence of bilateral breast cancer or the number of breast cancers in a family and the detection of a BRCA1 mutation, or between the position of the mutation in the BRCA1 gene and the presence of ovarian cancer in a family. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with breast cancer and a family history of the disease, the percentage with BRCA1 coding-region mutations is less than the 45 percent predicted by genetic-linkage analysis. These results suggest that even in a referral clinic specializing in screening women from high-risk families, the majority of tests for BRCA1 mutations will be negative and therefore uninformative.     

The role of ethnicity in cancer susceptibility gene polymorphisms: the example of CYP1A1

Individual susceptibility to cancer from environmental agents may be influenced by polymorphic metabolic genes such as CYP1A1. The CYP1A1 gene contains four major polymorphisms identified to date. A modern nomenclature system, used with other genes, is presented to clarify the identity of these polymorphisms. The various CYP1A1 alleles exhibit population frequencies that depend on ethnicity. The association of these alleles with cancer at several sites has also been found to depend on racial or ethnic origin of the study population. Statistical considerations, such as the need for large studies when the power to detect a rare polymorphism is low, and ethnic differences in genetic linkage disequilibrium are among possible reasons for ethnic-specific effects on cancer susceptibility related to metabolic gene polymorphisms. New efforts to determine population frequencies of such polymorphisms are essential for future research in this area.     

Frequent microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in the region including BRCA1 (17q21) in young patients with gastric cancer

It is known that nearly 5% of gastric carcinomas arise under the age of 40. To elucidate genetic alterations in these patients, we performed studies using microsatellite assay in 27 gastric cancers under 35 years of age, composed of 5 well and 22 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. We detected replication errors (RERs) in 18 (67%) of 27 tumors, but no germline mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2), except fory 3 somatic mutations in the hMLH1 gene. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at D17S855, located on chromosome 17q21 (BRCA1), was detected in 8 (40%) of 20 informative cases. In 12 (44%) of 27 cases, LOH on chromosome 17q12-21 including the BRCA1 was found in several neighboring markers in this region, while no mutation was found in the BRCA1 gene. Four (40%) of 10 scirrhous type gastric cancers exhibited wide allelic deletions on chromosome 17q12-21. These results overall suggest that young gastric cancer patients display highly frequent micro-satellite instability that might be due to defect of DNA repair system rather than hMLH1 and hMSH2. In addition, chromosome 17q12-21 including BRCA1 locus may contain a candidate for tumor suppressor gene, particularly in scirrhous type gastric cancers arising in young patients.     

EMS1 gene expression in primary breast cancer: relationship to cyclin D1 and oestrogen receptor expression and patient survival

The EMS1 and CCND1 genes at chromosome 11q13 are amplified in about 15% of primary breast cancers but appear to confer different phenotypes in ER positive and ER negative tumours. Since there are no published data on EMS1 expression in large series of breast cancers we examined the relationship of EMS1 expression with EMS1 gene copy number and expression of mRNAs for cyclin D1 and ER. In a subset of 129 patients, where matched tumour RNA and DNA was available, EMS1 mRNA overexpression was associated predominantly with gene amplification (P = 0.0061), whereas cyclin D1 mRNA overexpression was not (P = 0.3142). In a more extensive series of 351 breast cancers, there was no correlation between cyclin D1 and EMS1 expression in the EMS1 and cyclin D1 overexpressors (P = 0.3503). Although an association between EMS1 mRNA expression and ER positivity was evident (P = 0.0232), when the samples were divided into quartiles of EMS1 or cyclin D1 mRNA expression, the increase in the proportion of ER positive tumours in the ascending EMS1 mRNA quartiles was not statistically significant (P = 0.0951). In marked contrast there was a significant stepwise increase in ER positivity in ascending quartiles of cyclin D1 mRNA (P = 0.030). A potential explanation for this difference was provided by the observation that in ER positive breast cancer cells oestradiol treatment resulted in increased cyclin D1 gene expression but was without effect on EMS1. The relationship between EMS1 expression and clinical outcome was examined in a subset of 234 patients with median follow-up of 74 months. High EMS1 expression was associated with age > 50 years (P = 0.0001), postmenopausal status (P = 0.0008), lymph node negativity (P = 0.019) and an apparent trend for worse prognosis in the ER negative subgroup. These data demonstrate that overexpression of EMS1 mRNA is largely due to EMS1 gene amplification, is independent of cyclin D1 and ER expression and, in contrast to cyclin D1, is not regulated by oestrogen. Independent overexpression of these genes may confer different phenotypes and disease outcomes in breast cancer as has been inferred from recent studies of EMS1 and CCND1 gene amplification.