Increased neopterin in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes

The effect of aprotinin on Schistosoma mansoni miracidial penetration process, by its direct topical application on Biomphalaria alexandrina snails, was studied The snails were exposed to S. mansoni miracidial suspension which was mixed with aprotinin at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 20 Kallikrein inactivator units (KIU)/ml of applied solution. Results showed that aprotinin had marked inhibitory effect on miracidial penetration of the snails. The concentration that resulted in 50% inhibition of the miracidial penetration into B. alexandrina snails (LD50) was 2.4 KIU/ml while (LD96) was 20 KIU/ml of the applied solution. Thus, aprotinin may be one of the important methods in the control of schistosomiasis.     

Pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes

Coronary artery diseases may categorized into asymptomatic disease, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, and sudden coronary death. Unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death are known as the acute coronary syndromes. Coronary atheroma is unstable in the patients with acute coronary syndromes. Stable plaques will be unstable when dynamic alterations occur. The alterations are plaque rupture, plaque hemorrhage, coronary thrombosis and vasospasm. They act each other. We analysed the histopathology of coronary arteries who died of acute myocardial infarction in 85 cases. It showed that the risk factors of plaque rupture are clusters of form cells, eccentric plaque with soft lipid rich core, and thinning of fibrous cap in atheroma. Most of these cases ruptured at edge of the atheroma.     

Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes

Many advances in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes have been realized over recent years. In ST elevation myocardial infarction, new aggressive thrombolytic regimens improve early reperfusion and improve survival. The current focus is on bolus thrombolysis, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, and low-molecular-weight heparin as adjuncts. In unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, two major advances are IIb/IIIa inhibition and low-molecular-weight heparin, each of which significantly improves the outcome of patients and which have just been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Following acute coronary syndromes, cholesterol lowering with statin drugs has a major effect, even in the large group of patients with average cholesterol levels. Use of clopidogrel, a more potent antiplatelet agent than aspirin, appears to decrease recurrent ischemic events, which has highlighted the potential benefits of oral IIb/IIIa inhibitors, which are much more potent antiplatelet agents. An additional focus has been on ensuring that patients actually receive the currently available medications. With a great number of new medical treatments, the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes has improved and will continue to improve as we enter the next millennium.     

Myocardial perfusion imagings in acute coronary syndromes

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) is one of the most important clinical tools for the evaluation of chronic coronary artery disease. In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), resting MPI was applied in several emergency hospitals in Japan for the purpose of differential diagnosis, estimation of area at risk or myocardial stunning. It was also reported that the severity and the poor prognostic outcome could be predicted using myocardial fatty acid imaging in patients with ACS. However, benefits and clinical utilities of MPI in ACS remains still under clinical investigation with cost-effective aspect.     

Procoagulant and proinflammatory activity in acute coronary syndromes

Free-living elderly people aged > or = 65 y were recruited to assess riboflavin and vitamin B-6 intakes and status and the effect of riboflavin supplementation on biochemical indicators of these 2 vitamins. The status of riboflavin (erythrocyte glutathione reductase activation coefficient; EGRAC) and vitamin B-6 (plasma pyridoxal-5'-phosphate; PLP) were determined in a total sample of 92 subjects, from whom dietary intake data were obtained by using the diet history method (n = 83). Although dietary intakes of both vitamins were considered to be adequate according to current reference values, abnormal EGRAC and plasma PLP values were identified in 49% and 38% of subjects, respectively, with 21% having suboptimal status for both nutrients. A subgroup of subjects from the initial sample (n = 45) was assigned in a double-blind manner to receive either 1.6 or 25 mg riboflavin or placebo daily for 12 wk. In those subjects with a baseline EGRAC or plasma PLP value falling outside the currently accepted threshold value for adequacy, low-dose riboflavin supplementation improved status of the limiting nutrient significantly (P<0.0001 and P = 0.020 for EGRAC and plasma PLP responses, respectively). We conclude that a high proportion of healthy elderly people may have suboptimal status for these nutrients despite apparently adequate dietary intakes. Furthermore, we showed that riboflavin supplementation at physiologic doses corrects biochemical abnormalities of not only EGRAC, but also plasma PLP, confirming the biochemical interdependency of these vitamins and suggesting that riboflavin is the limiting nutrient.     

Advances in antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes

In the third of this series of clinical updates on recent advances in medication, RICHARD GRAY summarises the established benefits, safety and clinical side effects of the antidepressant mirtazapene.     

Unstable atherosclerotic plaque and acute coronary syndromes

Acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) participate significantly in cardiovascular and general morbidities and mortalities. Their common pathogenetic mechanism resides in the disturbance of the integrity of atherosclerotic plaque by a fissure, rupture, or ulceration and the origin of unstable atherosclerotic plaque by the formation of thrombi, which together with vasoconstriction, causes a varying degree of the dynamic obstruction of the coronary artery. Thrombogenesis takes place in coincidence with the factors of vascular wall, rheologic, thrombotic (proaggregatory and procoagulatory), and antithrombotic (antiaggregatory and anticoagulatory-fibrinolytic) factors. The formation of unstable atherosclerotic plaque is a critical point of the dissociation of both stable and unstable myocardial ischaemiae. The prevention and therapy of atherosclerosis must be complex, namely antiatherogenic, however most of all endothelium-protective, or cellulo-protective, antilipidogenic and antithrombogenic. They cannot be alternative; one therapy will not substitute another. Regarding the importance of even residual thrombosis and thrombin, new antithrombotic substances are being intensively investigated.     

Lipoprotein(a) as a risk predictor for cardiac mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes

AIMS: Raised lipoprotein(a) concentrations are considered to be a risk factor for atherothrombotic diseases. We examined whether baseline concentrations were a risk factor for an adverse outcome in patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred and nineteen patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndromes were studied and followed prospectively for a median of 3 years. The prognostic significance of a baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of > or = 30 mg x dl(-1) or lower for subsequent cardiac death was assessed in patients with myocardial infarction (266) and unstable angina (197) and compared with other variables in regression models. In patients with myocardial infarction, a baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of > or =30 mg x dl(-1) was associated with a 62% increase in subsequent cardiac death compared to the lower concentration group (29.8% vs 18.6%, Log rank P=0.04). In a multivariate regression model a baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of > or = 30 mg x dl(-1) retained its significance as an independent predictor of cardiac death (P=0.037). In patients with unstable angina, baseline concentrations of > or = 7.9 mg x dl(-1) were found to be significant predictors of cardiac death in univariate (P=0.021) and multivariate (P=0.035) regression models. CONCLUSION: Baseline lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes are associated with an increased risk of cardiac death. For patients with myocardial infarction a concentration of > or = 30 mg x dl(-1) appears appropriate as a risk discriminator; for patients admitted with unstable angina, however, much lower concentrations of lipoprotein(a) appear to be prognostically important.     

Management of unstable coronary syndromes in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafts following coronary angiography

A recent survey of psychiatric research indicates religion has been given little attention, and when it has been considered, the measures have been simplistic. The present study was designed to describe the religious needs and resources of psychiatric inpatients. With the use of a multidimensional conception of religion and two established instruments, 51 adult psychiatric inpatients were surveyed about their religious needs and resources. For comparison, 50 general medical/surgical patients, matched for age and gender, were also surveyed. Eighty-eight percent of the psychiatric patients reported three or more current religious needs. Although there were no differences in religious needs between the two patient groups, there were significant differences in religious resources. Psychiatric patients had lower spiritual well-being scores and were less likely to have talked with their clergy. Religion is important for the psychiatric patients, but they may need assistance to find resources to address their religious needs.     

Endothelin and big endothelin in coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes

Endothelin (ET), the most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor with mitogenic potency, is generated from its precursor big-endothelin (BET) in a proteolytic process and discussed as a pathogenetic factor in coronary artery disease and in the acute coronary syndromes. Several studies documented elevated plasma endothelin concentrations in acute myocardial infarction, but conflicting results were reported in patients with stable and unstable angina. Only few studies determined big endothelin, although it half-life and plasma concentrations are higher in comparison to endothelin. ET and BET levels (Radioimmunoassay, Biomedica GmbH, Vienna) were determined in patients with stable angina (SAP, n = 20), unstable angina (IAP, n = 12), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 12) and healthy subjects (NP, n = 11). The concentrations of ET and BET (median (minimum-maximum) in fmol/ml) of the patients with stable angina (SAP: ET 0.7 (0.3-1.1); BET 1.7 (0.7-2.9)), unstable angina (IAP: ET 1.0(0.5-1.7); BET 2.5 (1.3-4.1)) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI: ET 1.2 (0.6-2.3); BET 3.6 (3.2-5.3)) showed a significant difference compared to controls (NP: ET 0.5 (0.4-0.7); BET 1.4 (1.1-1.7)) (SAP vs. NP: ET p < 0.01; BET p < 0.05; IAP and AMI vs. NP: ET and BET p < 0.001). Also, the concentrations of the peptides differed significantly dependent on the clinical severity of coronary artery disease (AMI vs. SAP: ET and BET p < 0.001; AMI vs. IAP: BET p < 0.05; IAP vs. SAP: ET p < 0.05; BET p < 0.01). Twelve of 15 patients with big endothelin concentrations over 3 fmol/ml suffered acute myocardial infarction. Seven of 12 patients with AMI showed elevated ET and BET concentrations before the increase of creatinecinase. There was no correlation between number of risk factors per patient, cholesterin and subfractions, severity of CAD classified in one-two-three-vessel disease or coronary score according to modified criteria of the American Heart Association (AHA). We conclude that in patients with coronary artery disease endothelin and big endothelin levels are elevated and related to the clinical and not to the morphological severity of coronary artery disease. Big endothelin is the more sensitive parameter in comparison to endothelin and indicates a severe course of myocardial ischemia in patients with unstable angina. The development of assays with the possibility of a quick determination of the peptides may be valuable for risk stratification of acute coronary events.     

Tirofiban. A review of its use in acute coronary syndromes

Tirofiban is an intravenously administered nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist which specifically inhibits fibrinogen-dependent platelet aggregation and prolongs bleeding times in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation returns to near-baseline levels within 4 to 8 hours after cessation of a tirofiban infusion, a finding consistent with the drug's elimination half-life of approximately 2 hours. Three large clinical trials have shown that, when administered with a standard heparin and aspirin regimen, tirofiban reduces the risk of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularisation. In PRISM-PLUS, a study involving 1915 patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI, administration of intravenous tirofiban (0.4 microgram/kg/min loading dose for 30 minutes followed by a 0.10 microgram/kg/min infusion) with heparin for at least 48 (mean 71.3) hours reduced the 7-day risk of the composite end-point of MI, death and refractory ischaemia by 32% compared with heparin alone. The between-group risk reduction remained significant at 30 days (22%) and 6 months (19%). Similarly, in high-risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty in RESTORE, the addition of tirofiban (10 micrograms/kg bolus in the 3 minutes prior to intervention followed by 0.15 microgram/kg/min for 36 hours) to a standard heparin regimen significantly reduced the risk of ischaemic complications by 38% on day 2 and 27% on day 7 compared with heparin alone. Although interim analysis in PRISM-PLUS showed that the use of tirofiban without heparin increased the 7-day risk of death compared with heparin alone, this finding was inconsistent with the effects of tirofiban on the risk of death in PRISM, a study involving 3232 patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI. Tirofiban is generally well tolerated. Bleeding complications were the most commonly reported events associated with tirofiban in clinical trials, but the rate of major bleeding in tirofiban recipients was not significantly different from that reported with heparin. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 90,000 cells/microliter) occurred slightly more frequently with tirofiban (with or without heparin) than with heparin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban reduces the risk of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI and high-risk patients undergoing revascularisation when used against a background of heparin and aspirin. Furthermore, the drug has an acceptable tolerability profile. Therefore, intravenous tirofiban is likely to be used as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes including high-risk patients undergoing revascularisation.     

Treatment with beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive treatment with cyclosporin A (CsA) improves the survival of renal allografts, but is associated with renal vasoconstriction and hypertension. Previous reports suggest that the calcium-channel blockers nifedipine and amlodipine may improve graft function in CsA-treated patients. We have compared the effects of amlodipine (5-10 mg once daily) and nifedipine retard (10-40 mg twice daily) on renal function and blood pressure in renal transplant recipients treated with CsA. METHODS: This was a multicentre, two-way, crossover study in 27 evaluable hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency following renal transplantation, who were maintained on a stable dose of CsA. Patients received either amlodipine (5-10 mg once daily) or nifedipine retard (10-40 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks, and were then crossed over to the other treatment for a further 8 weeks. RESULTS: Trends were seen during amlodipine treatment towards larger improvements, in serum creatinine (by 8% of baseline on amlodipine vs 4% on nifedipine), lithium clearance (13% vs 2%), and glomerular filtration rate 11% vs 7%). Effective renal plasma flow was increased by 11% of baseline on nifedipine vs 9% on amlodipine. There were no significant differences between treatments. Amlodipine and nifedipine lowered systolic blood pressure to a similar extent (21 mmHg vs 15 mmHg respectively, P=0.25), but amlodipine was more effective than nifedipine in lowering diastolic blood pressure (13 mmHg vs 8 mmHg, P=0.006). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Once-daily amlodipine is at least as effective as twice-daily nifedipine retard in controlling blood pressure and does not adversely affect graft function in hypertensive renal allograft recipients.     

Emergent coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome

The incidence of emergent CABG in patients with acute coronary syndrome has been decreasing, because thrombolytic therapy and/or catheter intervention have proved to be done faster and more efficient. The present indication of CABG is mostly limited to patients with left main trunk lesion or severe triple vessel disease, whose PTCA is failed with persistent chest pain or unstable hemodynamic condition. The factors associated with an increased hospital mortality are ejection fraction < 30%, age > 70 years, presence of cardiogenic shock, and cardiac index < 1.5. The interval between operation and AMI is not a significant risk factor. The prognosis of the operative survivors is relatively good. The use of the internal thoracic artery graft does not influence on the early outcome as far as the preoperative hemodynamic condition is stable. To get better surgical results, improvements in intraoperative myocardial protection and in postoperative cardiac support are imperative.     

C-reactive protein as a marker for acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: For several years, acute coronary syndromes have been perceived as causing the most hospital admissions, and even hospital mortality. The syndrome of unstable angina frequently progresses to acute myocardial infarction but its pathogenesis is poorly understood, and prognosis determination is still problematic. We tested the hypothesis that measurement of the C-reactive protein in patients admitted for chest pain could be a marker for acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 110 patients admitted with suspected ischaemic heart disease, but without elevated serum creatine-kinase levels at the time of hospital admission. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on their final diagnosis: group 1 comprised patients with unstable angina; group 2 patients with acute myocardial infarction. We measured the C-reactive protein at the time of hospital admission. The concentration of C-reactive protein was elevated in 59% of the patients with a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, and in 5% of the patients with a final diagnosis of unstable angina, (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that C-reactive protein levels measured at the time of admission in patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease could be a marker for acute coronary syndromes, and helpful in identifying patients at high risk for acute myocardial infarction. Measurement of C-reactive protein may have practical clinical significance in the management of patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndromes.