Rotational Restraint of Pile Caps during Lateral Loading

A pure fixed-head (zero-rotation) condition at the top of a group of laterally loaded piles is seldom achievable in the field, even when piles are installed in a group that is “rigidly” constrained by a stiff concrete pile cap. Assuming complete fixity during design (zero rotation at the pile head) can result in underestimated values of pile-head deflection, and incorrect estimates of the magnitude and the location of maximum bending moments. A simple and practical approach is presented for estimating the moment restraint that is provided by the pile cap at the top of a pile group. The moment restraint, represented by the rotational restraint coefficient (KMθ), serves as a boundary condition for analyzing groups of laterally loaded piles. Full-scale field tests performed on two pile groups with concrete pile caps show that the proposed method for estimating rotational restraint provides results that are in good agreement with measured field performance.     

Soil–Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. I: Field Test

Two full-scale experiments using controlled blasting were conducted in the Port of Tokachi on Hokkaido Island, Japan, to assess the behavior of a single pile, a four-pile group, and a nine-pile group subjected to lateral spreading. The test piles were extensively instrumented with strain gauges to measure the distribution of bending moment during lateral spreading which allowed the backcalculation of the loading conditions, as well as the assessment of damage and performance of the piles. Based on the test results, it was concluded that using controlled blasting successfully liquefied the soil, and subsequently induced lateral spreading in the 4–6% surface slope test beds. The free-field soil displacements in the vicinity of the test piles were over 40 cm for both tests. When compared with the results from the single pile case, the effect of pile head restraint from the pile cap improved overall pile performance by decreasing the displacement of the pile groups and lowering the maximum moments in individual piles within each group. Finally, backcalculated soil reactions indicated that the liquefied soil layer imparted insignificant force to the piles. In the companion to this paper (Part II), an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading is presented.     

Pile Response to Lateral Spreads: Centrifuge Modeling

The paper presents results of eight centrifuge models of vertical single piles and pile groups subjected to earthquake-induced liquefaction and lateral spreading. The centrifuge experiments, conducted in a slightly inclined laminar box subjected to strong in-flight base shaking, simulate a mild, submerged, infinite ground slope containing a 6-m-thick prototype layer of liquefiable Nevada sand having a relative density of 40%. Two- and three-layer soil profiles were used in the models, with a 2-m-thick nonliquefiable stratum placed below, and in some cases also above the liquefiable Nevada sand. The model piles had an effective prototype diameter, d, of 0.6 m. The eight pile models simulated single end-bearing and floating reinforced concrete piles with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and two 2×2 end-bearing pile groups. Bending moments were measured by strain gauges placed along the pile models. The base shaking liquefied the sand layer and induced free field permanent lateral ground surface displacements between 0.7 and 0.9 m. In all experiments, the maximum permanent bending moments, Mmax occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied layers; the prototype measured values of Mmax ranged between about 10 and 300 kN?m. In most cases the bending moments first increased and then decreased during the shaking, despite the continued increase in free field displacement, indicating strain softening of the soil around the deep foundation. The largest values of Mmax were associated with single end-bearing piles in the three-layer profile, and the smallest values of Mmax were measured in the end-bearing pile groups in the two-layer profile. The companion paper further analyzes the Mmax measured in the single pile models, and uses them to calibrate two limit equilibrium methods for engineering evaluation of bending moments in the field. These two methods correspond to cases controlled, respectively, by the pressure of liquefied soil, and by the passive pressure of nonliquefied layers on the pile foundation.     

Centrifuge Model Study of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Clay

A series of centrifuge model tests has been conducted to examine the behavior of laterally loaded pile groups in normally consolidated and overconsolidated kaolin clay. The pile groups have a symmetrical plan layout consisting of 2, 2×2, 2×3, 3×3, and 4×4 piles with a center-to-center spacing of three or five times the pile width. The piles are connected by a solid aluminum pile cap placed just above the ground level. The pile load test results are expressed in terms of lateral load–pile head displacement response of the pile group, load experienced by individual piles in the group, and bending moment profile along individual pile shafts. It is established that the pile group efficiency reduces significantly with increasing number of piles in a group. The tests also reveal the shadowing effect phenomenon in which the front piles experience larger load and bending moment than that of the trailing piles. The shadowing effect is most significant for the lead row piles and considerably less significant for subsequent rows of trailing piles. The approach adopted by many researchers of taking the average performance of piles in the same row is found to be inappropriate for the middle rows, of piles for large pile groups as the outer piles in the row carry significantly more load and experience considerably higher bending moment than those of the inner piles.     

Cyclic Lateral Load Behavior of a Pile Cap and Backfill

A series of static cyclic lateral load tests were performed on a full-scale 4×3 pile group driven into a cohesive soil profile. Twelve 324-mm steel pipe piles were attached to a concrete pile cap 5.18×3.05?m in plan and 1.12?m in height. Pile–soil–pile interaction and passive earth pressure provided lateral resistance. Seven lateral load tests were conducted in total; four tests with backfill compacted in front of the pile cap; two tests without backfill; and one test with a narrow trench between the pile cap and backfill soil. The formation of gaps around the piles at larger deflections reduced the pile–soil–pile interaction resulting in a degraded linear load versus deflection response that was very similar for the two tests without backfill and the trenched test. A typical nonlinear backbone curve was observed for the backfill tests. However, for deflections greater than 5 mm, the load-deflection behavior significantly changed from a concave down shape for the first cycle to a concave up shape for the second and subsequent cycles. The concave up shape continued to degrade with additional cycles past the second and typically became relatively constant after five to seven cycles. A gap formed between the backfill soil and the pile cap, which contributed to the load-deflection degradation. Crack patterns and sliding surfaces were consistent with that predicted by the log spiral theory. The results from this study indicate that passive resistance contributes considerably to the lateral resistance. However, with cyclic loading the passive force degrades significantly for deflections greater than 0.5% of the pile cap height.     

Lateral Resistance of Full-Scale Pile Cap with Gravel Backfill

A static lateral load test was performed on a full-scale 3×3 pile group driven in saturated low-plasticity silts and clays. The steel pipe piles were attached to a concrete pile cap which created a “fixed-head” end constraint. A gravel backfill was compacted in place on the backside of the cap. Lateral resistance was therefore provided by pile–soil–pile interaction, as well as base friction and passive pressure on the cap. In this case, passive resistance contributed about 40% of the total resistance. The log–spiral method provided the best agreement with measured resistance. Estimates of passive pressure computed using the Rankine method significantly underestimated the resistance while the Coulomb method overestimated resistance. The cap movement required to fully mobilize passive resistance in the gravel backfill was about 6% of the cap height. This is somewhat larger than reported in other studies likely due to the underlying clay layer. The p-multipliers developed for the free-head pile group provided reasonable estimates of the pile–soil–pile resistance for the fixed-head pile group once gaps adjacent to the pile were considered.     

Ultimate Lateral Resistance of Pile Groups in Sand

Experimental investigations on model pile groups of configuration 1 × 1, 2 × 1, 3 × 1, 2 × 2, and 3 × 2 for embedment length-to-diameter ratios L∕d = 12 and 38, spacing from 3 to 6 pile diameter, and pile friction angles δ = 20° and 31°, subjected to lateral loads, were conducted in dry Ennore sand obtained from Chennai, India. The load-displacement response, ultimate resistance, and group efficiency with spacing and number of piles in a group have been qualitatively and quantitatively investigated. Analytical methods have been proposed to predict the ultimate lateral capacity of single pile and pile groups. The proposed methods account for pile friction angle, embedment length-to-diameter ratio, the spacing of piles in a group, pile group configuration, and soil properties. These methods are capable of predicting the lateral capacity of piles and pile groups reasonably well as noted and substantiated by the comparison with the experimental results of the writers and other researchers.     

Soil-Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. II: Analysis and Assessment of the p–y Method

This paper presents an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading. The computed responses were compared with the results from the full-scale lateral spreading tests in Japan as presented in the Part I companion paper. The responses of the single piles subjected to lateral spreading were determined by imposing the known free-field soil movement profile to the Winkler spring model. The soil springs of nonliquefied soils used in this study were based upon standard p–y springs whereas zero spring stiffness was used for liquefied soils. For the case of pile groups, they were modeled as an equivalent single pile with a rotational spring at the pile head to simulate effect of pile head restraint. A decrease of soil spring stiffnesses using the p-multiplier approach was used to account for pile group effects. Based on the results of analyses, the computed responses of all sets of the test piles using a single set of baseline soil properties were in good agreement with the measured responses. These results suggest that the p–y analysis method may be used to estimate the behavior of piles subjected to lateral spreading.     

Lateral Behavior of Vertical Pile Group Embedded in Stabilized Earth Slope

An experimental study of the lateral behavior of vertical pile groups embedded in reinforced and nonreinforced sandy earth slopes was carried out. The model tests include studies of group configurations, pile spacing, embedment length of pile, relative densities of sand, and location of pile groups relative to the slope crest. Several configurations of geogrid reinforcement with different lengths, widths, and number of layers were used to reinforce a sandy slope of 1 (V): 1.5 (H). Pile groups of 2×2 and 3×3 along with center-to-center pile spacing of 2D, 3D, and 4.5D and piles with embedment length to diameter ratios of L/D = 12 and 22 were considered. Based on test results, geogrid parameters that give the maximum lateral capacity improvement are presented and discussed.     

Parametric Study of Concrete Integral Abutment Bridges

A parametric study was conducted to extend the results of an experimental program on a concrete integral abutment (IA) bridge in Rochester, MN to other integral abutment bridges with different design variables including pile type, size, orientation, depth of fixity, and type of surrounding soil, fixity of the connection between the abutment pile cap and abutment diaphragm, bridge span and length, and size and orientation of the wingwalls. The numerical results indicated that bridge length and soil types surrounding the piles had a significant impact on the behavior of IA bridges. To select pile type and orientation, there is a need to balance the stresses in the piles with the stresses in the superstructure for long IA bridges or IA bridges in stiff soils. Plastic hinge formation is possible at the pile section near the pile head for combined critical variables, such as long span, compliant piles in weak axis bending, deep girders, and stiff soils. Because large pile curvatures or stresses may be caused due to the rotation of the pile cap during temperature increases, hinged connections between the abutment pile cap and diaphragm are not recommended for the practice of IA bridges. Cast-in-place piles are recommended only for short-span IA bridges because their relatively large bending stiffness can cause large superstructure concrete stresses during temperature changes.     

Numerical Analysis of Laterally Loaded 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 Pile Groups in Sands

The coupled bridge foundation-superstructure finite-element code FLPIER was employed to predict the lateral response of the single piles and 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups founded in both loose and medium dense sands. The p-multiplier factors suggested by McVay et al. for laterally loaded pile groups with multiple pile rows were implemented for the predictions. The soil parameters were obtained through a back-analysis procedure based on single pile test results. The latter, as well as the numerical predictions of both the single and group tests, are presented. It was found that the numerical code FLPIER did an excellent job of predicting the response of both the single piles and the 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups. The latter involved the predictions of lateral load versus lateral deflection of the group, the shears and bending moments developed in the individual piles, and the distributions of the lateral loads in each pile row, which were all in good agreement with the measured results.     

Single Piles in Lateral Spreads: Field Bending Moment Evaluation

The results of the six centrifuge models of instrumented single pile foundations presented in a companion paper, are used to calibrate two limit equilibrium (LE) methods to evaluate bending response and factor of safety against bending failure of piles in the field subjected to lateral spreading. These six models simulate single reinforced concrete piles in two- and three-layer soil profiles, mostly end bearing but including also one floating pile, with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and one model where the liquefiable sand layer was densified locally around the pile to simulate the effect of pile driving. The measured permanent maximum bending moments in the pile, Mmax, invariably occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied soil layers, and in most cases the moments at such boundaries reached their peak Mmax and then decreased during shaking. These values of Mmax before decrease, which were associated with failure of the soil against the deep foundation, are used to calibrate the two proposed LE engineering methods. For the piles where Mmax was controlled by the pressure of the liquefied soil, the measured prototype Mmax in the centrifuge tests ranged between about 100 and 200 kN?m. It is found that a lateral pressure per unit area of pile or pile cap constant with depth (pl) of 10.3 kPa, predicts Mmax of the single piles tested within 15%. For the cases where Mmax was controlled by passive failure of the shallow nonliquefied layer, the prototype Mmax measured at the upper and lower boundaries of the liquefied soil in the centrifuge tests ranged between 160 and 305 kN?m. The Mmax values of 160–270 kN?m measured at the upper boundary were reached during the shaking, and then observed to decrease towards the end of shaking. At the lower boundary, the measured Mmax of 305 kN?m was reached at the end of shaking. Use of passive pressure against the pile of the shallow nonliquefiable soil layer, obtained from the ultimate plateaus (pult) of p-y curves, in conjunction with basic pile kinematic considerations and parameters addressed herein, explains well the development of moments measured in the centrifuge at both the upper and lower boundaries of the liquefied layer. This good accord validates the simplified LE prediction of Mmax at the upper boundary. The two proposed simplified engineering LE methods are used to evaluate bending response and distress of end-bearing and floating piles in the Niigata Family Court House building during the 1964 Niigata earthquake, with good agreement between predicted and observed performance.     

Simplified Approach for the Seismic Response of a Pile Foundation

Pseudostatic approaches for the seismic analysis of pile foundations are attractive for practicing engineers because they are simple when compared to difficult and more complex dynamic analyses. To evaluate the internal response of piles subjected to earthquake loading, a simplified approach based on the “p-y” subgrade reaction method has been developed. The method involves two main steps: first, a site response analysis is carried out to obtain the free-field ground displacements along the pile. Next, a static load analysis is carried out for the pile, subjected to the computed free-field ground displacements and the static loading at the pile head. A pseudostatic push over analysis is adopted to simulate the behavior of piles subjected to both lateral soil movements and static loadings at the pile head. The single pile or the pile group interact with the surrounding soil by means of hyperbolic p-y curves. The solution derived first for the single pile, was extended to the case of a pile group by empirical multipliers, which account for reduced resistance and stiffness due to pile-soil-pile interaction. Numerical results obtained by the proposed simplified approach were compared with experimental and numerical results reported in literature. It has been shown that this procedure can be used successfully for determining the response of a pile foundation to “inertial” loading caused by the lateral forces imposed on the superstructure and “kinematic” loading caused by the ground movements developed during an earthquake.     

Group Interaction Effects on Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay

This paper presents the results of static lateral load tests carried out on 1×2, 2×2, 1×4, and 3×3 model pile groups embedded in soft clay. Tests were carried out on piles with length to diameter ratios of 15, 30, and 40 and three to nine pile diameter spacing. The effects of pile spacing, number of piles, embedment length, and configuration on pile-group interaction were investigated. Group efficiency, critical spacing, and p multipliers were evaluated from the experimental study. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained from the program GROUP. It has been found that the lateral capacity of piles in 3×3 group at three diameter spacing is about 40% less than that of the single pile. Group interaction causes 20% increase in the maximum bending moment in piles of the groups with three diameter spacing in comparison to the single pile. Results indicate substantial difference in p multipliers of the corresponding rows of the linear and square pile groups. The predicted field group behavior is in good agreement with the actual field test results reported in the literature.     

Experimental Testing of Pile-to-Cap Connections for Embedded Pipe Piles

For bridges supported by piles, acceptable system performance under seismic loading depends on effective pile-to-cap connections. A fixed pile-to-cap connection is often desirable to help control deflections during lateral loading when soft soils are present. While reinforcement bar cages that extend from the pile into the cap are effective in providing a fixed pile-to-cap connection, it is more economical to rely on pile embedment to provide fixity and moment resistance. This study investigated embedded pile-to-cap connections for concrete-filled pipe piles. Four full-scale specimens, each consisting of a cap with two piles, were investigated in the field under cyclic loading. The specimens had minimal reinforcement and varying amounts of pile embedment. Results show that the moment resistance of pile-to-cap connections can be significantly greater than what is typically calculated based on the flexural reinforcement and embedment bearing. Excess moment capacity may be explained by friction between the pile and the cap at the connection. This friction mechanism is described and discussed in the context of experimental results from other studies.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Torsionally Loaded Pile Groups

This paper reports a series of centrifuge model tests on torsionally loaded 1×2, 2×2, and 3×3 pile groups in sand. The objectives of the paper are to investigate: (1) the response of the pile groups subjected to torsion; (2) the way in which the applied torque is transferred in the pile groups; (3) the internal forces mobilized in these torsionally loaded pile groups and their contributions to resist the applied torque; and (4) the influence factors that affect the load transfer, such as soil density and pile-cap connection. In these model tests, the group torsional resistances of the pile groups increased monotonically in the test range of twist angles up to 8°. Both torsional and lateral resistances of the individual piles were simultaneously mobilized to resist the applied torque. The torsional resistances were substantially mobilized at small twist angles, while the lateral resistances kept increasing in the whole range of twist angles. Thus, the contribution of the torsional resistances to the applied torque decreased at large twist angles. The piles at different locations in a pile group could develop not only different horizontal displacements, but also different pile–soil–pile interactions and load–deformation coupling effect, hence, the torsional and lateral resistances of the piles are a function of pile location. The soil density had a more significant effect on the torsional resistances than on the lateral resistances of the group piles.     

Static Pushover Analyses of Pile Groups in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground in Centrifuge Tests

Monotonic, static beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) methods are used to analyze a suite of dynamic centrifuge model tests involving pile group foundations embedded in a mildly sloping soil profile that develops liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during earthquake shaking. A single set of recommended design guidelines was used for a baseline set of analyses. When lateral spreading demands were modeled by imposing free-field soil displacements to the free ends of the soil springs (BNWF_SD), bending moments were predicted within ?8% to +69 (16th to 84th percentile values) and pile cap displacements were predicted within ?6 to +38%, with the accuracy being similar for small, medium, and large motions. When lateral spreading demands were modeled by imposing limit pressures directly to the pile nodes (BNWF_LP), bending moments and cap displacements were greatly overpredicted for small and medium motions where the lateral spreading displacements were not large enough to mobilize limit pressures, and pile cap displacements were greatly underpredicted for large motions. The effects of various parameter relations and alternative design guidelines on the accuracy of the BNWF analyses were evaluated. Sources of bias and dispersion in the BNWF predictions and the issues of greatest importance to foundation performance are discussed. The results of these comparisons indicate that certain guidelines and assumptions that are common in engineering design can produce significantly conservative or unconservative BNWF predictions, whereas the guidelines recommended herein can produce reasonably accurate predictions.     

Effect of Soil Permeability on Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading

This paper presents experimental results and analysis of six model centrifuge experiments conducted on the 150?g-ton Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute centrifuge to investigate the effect of soil permeability on the response of end-bearing single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading. The models were tested in a laminar box and simulate a mild infinite slope with a liquefiable sand layer on top of a nonliquefiable layer. Three fine sand models consisting of a single pile, a 3×1 pile group, and a 2×2 pile group were tested, first using water as pore fluid, and then repeated using a viscous pore fluid, hence simulating two sands of different permeability in the field. The results were dramatically different, with the three tests simulating a low permeability soil developing 3–6 times larger pile head displacements and bending moments at the end of shaking. Deformation observations of colored sand strips, as well as measurements of sustained negative excess pore pressures near the foundations in the “viscous fluid” experiments, indicated that an approximately inverted conical zone of nonliquefied soil had formed in these tests at shallow depths around the foundation, which forced the liquefied soil in the free field to apply its lateral pressure against a much larger effective foundation area. Additional p-y and limit equilibrium back-analyses support the hypothesis that the greatly increased foundation bending response observed when the soil is less pervious is due to the formation of such inverted conical volume of nonliquefied sand. This study provides evidence of the importance of soil permeability on pile foundations response during lateral spreading for cases when the liquefied deposit reaches the ground surface, and suggests that bending response may be greater in silty sands than in clean sands in the field. Moreover, the observations in this study may serve as basis for realistic practical engineering methods to evaluate pile foundations subjected to lateral spreading and pressure of liquefied soil.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups with Defects

In this research, centrifuge model pile-load tests were carried out to failure to investigate the behavior of large-diameter bored pile groups with defects. The model piles represented cast-in-place concrete piles 2.0?m in diameter and 15?m in length. Two series of static loading tests were performed. The first series of tests simulated the performance of a pile founded on rock and a pile with a soft toe. The second series of tests simulated the performance of three 2×2 pile groups: One reference group without defects, one group containing soft toes, and one group with two shorter piles not founded on rock. The presence of soft toes and shorter piles in the defective pile groups considerably reduced the pile group stiffness and capacity. As the defective piles were less stiff than the piles without defects, the settlements of the individual piles in the two defective pile groups were different. As a result, the applied load was largely shared by the piles without defects, and the defective pile groups tilted significantly. The rotation of the defective pile groups caused large bending moments to develop in the group piles and the pile caps. When the applied load was large, bending failure mechanisms were induced even though the applied load was vertical and concentric. The test results confirm findings from numerical analyses in the literature.     

Experimental Study of Three-Dimensional Flow Field around a Complex Bridge Pier

In this paper, three-dimensional turbulent flow field around a complex bridge pier placed on a rough fixed bed is experimentally investigated. The complex pier foundation consists of a column, a pile cap, and a 2×4 pile group. All of the elements are exposed to the approaching flow. An acoustic-Doppler velocimeter was used to measure instantaneously the three components of the velocities at different horizontal and vertical planes. Profiles and contours of time-averaged velocity components, turbulent intensity components, turbulent kinetic energy, and Reynolds stresses, as well as velocity vectors are presented and discussed at different vertical and horizontal planes. The approaching boundary layer at the upstream of the pile cap separated in two vertical directions and induced an upward flow toward the column and a contracted downward flow below the pile cap and toward the piles. The contracted upward flow on the pile cap interacts with downflow in the front of the column and deflects toward the side of the pier, which in return produces a strong downflow along the side of the pile cap. The flow at the rear of the pile cap is very complex. The strong downward flow at the downstream and near the top of the pile cap in interaction with the reverse flow behind the column and upward flow near the bed produce two vortices close to the upper and lower corners of the pile cap with opposite direction of rotation. On the other hand, the back-flow from the wake of the pile cap is forced into the top region resulting in a secondary recirculation at the wake of the column. The contracted flow below the pile cap and toward the piles, a strong downflow along the sides of the pile cap at the upstream region, and a vortex flow behind the pile cap and an amplification of turbulence intensity along the sides of the pile cap at the downstream region are the main features of the flow responsible for the entrainment of bed sediments.