Single Piles in Lateral Spreads: Field Bending Moment Evaluation

The results of the six centrifuge models of instrumented single pile foundations presented in a companion paper, are used to calibrate two limit equilibrium (LE) methods to evaluate bending response and factor of safety against bending failure of piles in the field subjected to lateral spreading. These six models simulate single reinforced concrete piles in two- and three-layer soil profiles, mostly end bearing but including also one floating pile, with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and one model where the liquefiable sand layer was densified locally around the pile to simulate the effect of pile driving. The measured permanent maximum bending moments in the pile, Mmax, invariably occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied soil layers, and in most cases the moments at such boundaries reached their peak Mmax and then decreased during shaking. These values of Mmax before decrease, which were associated with failure of the soil against the deep foundation, are used to calibrate the two proposed LE engineering methods. For the piles where Mmax was controlled by the pressure of the liquefied soil, the measured prototype Mmax in the centrifuge tests ranged between about 100 and 200 kN?m. It is found that a lateral pressure per unit area of pile or pile cap constant with depth (pl) of 10.3 kPa, predicts Mmax of the single piles tested within 15%. For the cases where Mmax was controlled by passive failure of the shallow nonliquefied layer, the prototype Mmax measured at the upper and lower boundaries of the liquefied soil in the centrifuge tests ranged between 160 and 305 kN?m. The Mmax values of 160–270 kN?m measured at the upper boundary were reached during the shaking, and then observed to decrease towards the end of shaking. At the lower boundary, the measured Mmax of 305 kN?m was reached at the end of shaking. Use of passive pressure against the pile of the shallow nonliquefiable soil layer, obtained from the ultimate plateaus (pult) of p-y curves, in conjunction with basic pile kinematic considerations and parameters addressed herein, explains well the development of moments measured in the centrifuge at both the upper and lower boundaries of the liquefied layer. This good accord validates the simplified LE prediction of Mmax at the upper boundary. The two proposed simplified engineering LE methods are used to evaluate bending response and distress of end-bearing and floating piles in the Niigata Family Court House building during the 1964 Niigata earthquake, with good agreement between predicted and observed performance.     

Simplified Lateral Load Analyses of Fixed-Head Piles and Pile Groups

The characteristic load method (CLM) can be used to estimate lateral deflections and maximum bending moments in single fixed-head piles under lateral load. However, this approach is limited to cases where the lateral load on the pile top is applied at the ground surface. When the pile top is embedded, as in most piles that are capped, the additional embedment results in an increased lateral resistance. A simple approach to account for embedment effects in the CLM is presented for single fixed-head piles. In practice, fixed-head piles are more typically used in groups where the response of an individual pile can be influenced through the adjacent soil by the response of other nearby piles. This pile–soil–pile interaction results in larger deflections and moments in pile groups for the same load per pile compared to single piles. A simplified procedure to estimate group deflections and moments was also developed based on the p-multiplier approach. Group amplification factors are introduced to amplify the single pile deflection and bending moment to reflect pile–soil–pile interaction. The resulting approach lends itself well to simple spreadsheet computations and provides good agreement with other generally accepted analytical tools and with values measured in published lateral load tests on groups of fixed-head piles.     

Pile Response to Lateral Spreads: Centrifuge Modeling

The paper presents results of eight centrifuge models of vertical single piles and pile groups subjected to earthquake-induced liquefaction and lateral spreading. The centrifuge experiments, conducted in a slightly inclined laminar box subjected to strong in-flight base shaking, simulate a mild, submerged, infinite ground slope containing a 6-m-thick prototype layer of liquefiable Nevada sand having a relative density of 40%. Two- and three-layer soil profiles were used in the models, with a 2-m-thick nonliquefiable stratum placed below, and in some cases also above the liquefiable Nevada sand. The model piles had an effective prototype diameter, d, of 0.6 m. The eight pile models simulated single end-bearing and floating reinforced concrete piles with and without a reinforced concrete pile cap, and two 2×2 end-bearing pile groups. Bending moments were measured by strain gauges placed along the pile models. The base shaking liquefied the sand layer and induced free field permanent lateral ground surface displacements between 0.7 and 0.9 m. In all experiments, the maximum permanent bending moments, Mmax occurred at the boundaries between liquefied and nonliquefied layers; the prototype measured values of Mmax ranged between about 10 and 300 kN?m. In most cases the bending moments first increased and then decreased during the shaking, despite the continued increase in free field displacement, indicating strain softening of the soil around the deep foundation. The largest values of Mmax were associated with single end-bearing piles in the three-layer profile, and the smallest values of Mmax were measured in the end-bearing pile groups in the two-layer profile. The companion paper further analyzes the Mmax measured in the single pile models, and uses them to calibrate two limit equilibrium methods for engineering evaluation of bending moments in the field. These two methods correspond to cases controlled, respectively, by the pressure of liquefied soil, and by the passive pressure of nonliquefied layers on the pile foundation.     

Soil–Pile Response to Blast-Induced Lateral Spreading. I: Field Test

Two full-scale experiments using controlled blasting were conducted in the Port of Tokachi on Hokkaido Island, Japan, to assess the behavior of a single pile, a four-pile group, and a nine-pile group subjected to lateral spreading. The test piles were extensively instrumented with strain gauges to measure the distribution of bending moment during lateral spreading which allowed the backcalculation of the loading conditions, as well as the assessment of damage and performance of the piles. Based on the test results, it was concluded that using controlled blasting successfully liquefied the soil, and subsequently induced lateral spreading in the 4–6% surface slope test beds. The free-field soil displacements in the vicinity of the test piles were over 40 cm for both tests. When compared with the results from the single pile case, the effect of pile head restraint from the pile cap improved overall pile performance by decreasing the displacement of the pile groups and lowering the maximum moments in individual piles within each group. Finally, backcalculated soil reactions indicated that the liquefied soil layer imparted insignificant force to the piles. In the companion to this paper (Part II), an assessment of the potential of using the p–y analysis method for single piles and pile groups subjected to lateral spreading is presented.     

Behavior of Slender Piles Subject to Free-Field Lateral Soil Movement

Soil movements associated with slope instability induce shear forces and bending moments in stabilizing piles that vary with the buildup of passive pile resistance. For such free-field lateral soil movements, stress development along the pile element is a function of the relative displacement between the soil and the pile. To investigate the effects of relative soil-pile displacement on pile response, large-scale load tests were performed on relatively slender, drilled, composite pile elements (cementitious grout with centered steel reinforcing bar). The piles were installed through a shear box into stable soil and then loaded by lateral translation of the shear box. The load tests included two pile diameters (nominal 115 and 178?mm) and three cohesive soil types (loess, glacial till, and weathered shale). Instrumentation indicated the relative soil-pile displacements and the pile response to the loads that developed along the piles. Using the experimental results, an analysis approach was evaluated using soil p-y curves derived from laboratory undrained shear strength tests. The test piles and analyses helped characterize behavioral stages of the composite pile elements at loads up to pile section failure and also provided a unique dataset to evaluate the lateral response analysis method for its applicability to slender piles.     

Behavior of Model Rafts Resting on Pile-Reinforced Sand

Piles in a pile raft are sometimes considered as settlement reducers, not load-carrying members. In design, one often tries to minimize the number of piles. This often results in a high axial stress in the piles that may deter their use due to the limits on pile stress in practice. An alternative is to consider the pile as reinforcement in the base soil, and not as a structural member. Serving as a soil stiffener, the pile can tolerate a lower safety margin against structural failure without violating building codes. Previous numerical studies on the use of disconnected piles as settlement reducers have shown the effectiveness of such piles. This study aims to verify experimentally the effectiveness of such piles through load tests of model rafts resting on pile-reinforced sand. By varying factors such as raft stiffness, pile length, pile arrangement, and pile number, results of the investigation indicate that structurally disconnected piles are effective in reducing the settlement and bending moments in the model rafts.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups with Defects

In this research, centrifuge model pile-load tests were carried out to failure to investigate the behavior of large-diameter bored pile groups with defects. The model piles represented cast-in-place concrete piles 2.0?m in diameter and 15?m in length. Two series of static loading tests were performed. The first series of tests simulated the performance of a pile founded on rock and a pile with a soft toe. The second series of tests simulated the performance of three 2×2 pile groups: One reference group without defects, one group containing soft toes, and one group with two shorter piles not founded on rock. The presence of soft toes and shorter piles in the defective pile groups considerably reduced the pile group stiffness and capacity. As the defective piles were less stiff than the piles without defects, the settlements of the individual piles in the two defective pile groups were different. As a result, the applied load was largely shared by the piles without defects, and the defective pile groups tilted significantly. The rotation of the defective pile groups caused large bending moments to develop in the group piles and the pile caps. When the applied load was large, bending failure mechanisms were induced even though the applied load was vertical and concentric. The test results confirm findings from numerical analyses in the literature.     

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Performance of Laterally Loaded Sleeved Piles in Sloping Ground

Development of urban cities in hilly terrain often involves the construction of high-rise buildings supported by large diameter piles on steep cut slopes. Under lateral loads, the piles may induce slope failure, particularly at shallow depths. To minimize the transfer of lateral load from the buildings to the shallow depths of the slope, an annulus of compressible material, referred to as sleeving, is usually constructed between the piles and the adjacent soil. However, the influence of the sleeving on the pile performance in a sloping ground is not fully studied and understood. To investigate the influence, a 3D numerical analysis of sleeved and unsleeved piles on a cut slope is described in this paper. The influences of relative soil stiffness on the response of sleeved piles are also examined. The load transfer from the laterally loaded sleeved pile to the sloping ground is primarily through a shear load transfer mechanism in the vertical plane. Under small lateral loads, the sleeving can lead to a significant reduction in subgrade reaction on the sleeved pile segment and may considerably increase the pile deflection and bending moments. Under large lateral loads, the influence of the sleeving on pile performance appears to diminish because of the widespread plastic zones developed around the pile.     

Behavior of Pile Groups Subject to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement in Very Soft Clay

A series of centrifuge model tests was conducted to investigate the behavior of pile groups of various sizes and configurations behind a retaining wall in very soft clay. With a 1.2-m excavation in front of the wall, which may simulate the initial stage of an excavation prior to strutting, the test results reveal that the induced bending moment on an individual pile in a free-head pile group is always smaller than that on a corresponding single pile located at the same distance behind the wall. This is attributed to the shadowing and reinforcing effects of other piles within the group. The degree of shadowing experienced by a pile depends on its relative position in the pile group. With a capped-head pile group, the individual piles are forced to interact in unison though subjected to different magnitudes of soil movement. Thus, despite being subjected to a larger soil movement, the induced bending moment on the front piles is moderated by the rear piles through the pile cap. A finite element program developed at the National University of Singapore is employed to back-analyze the centrifuge test data. The program gives a reasonably good prediction of the induced pile bending moments provided an appropriate modification factor is applied for the free-field soil movement and the amount of restraint provided by the pile cap is properly accounted for. The modification factor applied to the free-field soil movement accounts the reinforcing effect of the piles on the soil movement.     

Behavior of Pile Groups Subject to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement

Centrifuge model tests have been conducted on free-head and capped-head pile groups consisting of two, four, and six piles located adjacent to an unstrutted deep excavation in sand. It is found that when two free- or capped-head piles are arranged in a row parallel to the retaining wall, the interaction effect between piles is insignificant. When two piles are arranged in a line perpendicular to the wall, the existence of a front pile would reduce the detrimental effect of excavation-induced soiled movement on the rear pile. In addition, the provision of a pile cap for two piles arranged in a line would exert a significant influence on the behavior of the pile group. For free-head four- or six-pile groups, the induced bending moment decreases as the number of piles increases. Moreover, the interior piles of the pile group always experience lower bending moments than those of peripheral piles as the latter have more exposure to the excavation-induced soil movement and are thus more adversely affected. For the capped-head four- or six-pile groups, it can be established that the provision of a pile cap would help to moderate the pile-group deflection against soil movement as the rear piles, that are located farther away from the wall and thus less affected by the soil movement, would drag the front piles back.     

Pseudostatic Approach for Seismic Analysis of Single Piles

This paper evaluates a simple approximate methodology for estimating the maximum internal forces of piles subjected to lateral seismic excitation. The method involves two main steps: computation of the free-field soil movements caused by the earthquake and the analysis of the response of the pile to the maximum free-field soil movements (considered as static movements) plus a static loading at the pile head, which depends on the computed spectral acceleration of the structure being supported. The applicability of this approach has been verified by an independent benchmark analysis developed by the writers. It is demonstrated that the proposed method yields reasonable estimates of the pile maximum moment and shear. The methodology is then used to obtain the response of the Ohba-Ohashi bridge in Japan to one of the earthquakes that occurred in the 1980s. Good agreement is found between the computed and measured pile moments.     

Dynamic Experiments and Analyses of a Pile-Group-Supported Structure

Experimental data on the seismic response of a pile-group-supported structure was obtained through dynamic centrifuge model tests, and then used to evaluate a dynamic beam on a nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) analysis method. The centrifuge tests included a structure supported on a group of nine piles founded in soft clay overlying dense sand. This structure was subjected to nine earthquake events with peak accelerations ranging from 0.02 to 0.7g. The centrifuge tests and dynamic analysis methods are described. Good agreement was obtained between calculated and recorded structural responses, including superstructure acceleration and displacement, pile cap acceleration and displacement, pile bending moment and axial load, and pile cap rotation. Representative examples of recorded and calculated behavior for the structure and soil profile are presented. Sensitivity of the dynamic BNWF analyses to the numerical model parameters and site response calculations are evaluated. These results provide experimental support for the use of dynamic BNWF analysis methods in seismic soil-pile-structure interaction problems involving pile-group systems.     

Lateral Loaded Pile Response in Liquefiable Soil

This paper provides a new analysis procedure for assessing the lateral response of an isolated pile in saturated sands as liquefaction develops in response to dynamic loading such as that generated during earthquake shaking. This new procedure predicts the degradation in pile response and soil resistance due to the free-field excess porewater pressure generated by the earthquake, along with the near-field excess porewater pressure generated by lateral loading from the superstructure. The new procedure involves the integration of the developing (free- and near-field) porewater pressure in the strain wedge (SW) model analysis. The current SW model, developed to evaluate drained response (a nonlinear three-dimensional model) of a flexible pile in soil, has been extended in this paper to incorporate the undrained response of a laterally loaded pile in liquefied sand. This new procedure has the capability of predicting the response of a laterally loaded isolated pile and the associated modulus of subgrade reaction (i.e., the p–y curve) in a mobilized fashion as a result of developing liquefaction in the sand. Current design procedures assume slight or no resistance for the lateral movement of the pile in the liquefied soil which is a conservative practice. Alternatively, if liquefaction is assessed not to occur, some practitioners take no account of the increased free-field porewater pressure, and none consider the additional near-field porewater pressure due to inertial interaction loading from the superstructure; a practice that is unsafe in loose sands.     

Pile Spacing Effects on Lateral Pile Group Behavior: Analysis

Using the results from three full-scale lateral pile group load tests in stiff clay with spacing ranging from 3.3 to 5.65, computer analyses were performed to back-calculate p multipliers. The p multipliers, which account for reduced resistance due to pile–soil–pile interaction, increased as pile spacing increased from 3.3 to 5.65 diameters. Extrapolation of the test results suggests that group reduction effects can be neglected for spacings greater than about 6.5 for leading row piles and 7–8 diameters for trailing row piles. Based on analysis of the full-scale test results, pile behavior can be grouped into three general categories, namely: (1) first or front row piles; (2) second row piles; and (3) third and higher row piles. p multiplier versus normalized pile spacing curves were developed for each category. The proposed curves yield p multipliers which are higher than those previously recommended by AASHTO in 2000, the US Army in 1993, and the US Navy in 1982 based on limited test data, but lower values than those proposed by Reese et al. in 1996 and Reese and Van Impe in 2001. The response (load versus deflection, maximum moment versus load, and bending moment versus depth) for each row of the pile groups computed using GROUP and Florida Pier generally correlated very well with measurements from the full-scale tests when the p multipliers developed from this test program were employed.     

Note on the Interaction Factor for Two Laterally Loaded Piles

This technical note revisits the interaction factors for two piles under lateral loading by means of a rigorous analytical method. The basic idea of the approach presented is to decompose the problem into an extended elastic soil and two fictitious piles having Young’s modulus equal to the difference between the modulus of the real pile and the surrounding soil. By considering the displacement compatibility condition, the pile–soil interaction problem is found to be governed by a Fredholm equation of the second kind. The displacement and bending moment distribution along the fictitious piles, and consequently, the desired interaction factor at the pile head are obtained. Comparison with existing solutions validates the accuracy of the present formulation and confirms that the conventional interaction factor approach would exaggerate the interaction effect for long flexible piles. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the influences of the pile spacing, pile–soil stiffness ratio, pile slenderness ratio, and departure angle of the loading direction on the calculated results. A set of interaction factor charts is also provided.     

Seismic Behavior of Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Soils: Parametric Study

Nonlinearity of the soil medium plays a very important role on the seismic behavior of soil-pile-structure interaction. The problem of soil-pile-structure interaction is further complicated when the piles are embedded in liquefiable soil medium. A finite-element code was developed in MATLAB to model three-dimensional soil-pile-structure systems. Frequency dependent Kelvin elements (spring and dashpots) were used to model the radiation boundary conditions. A work-hardening plastic cap model was used for constitutive modeling of the soil medium. The pore pressure generation for liquefaction was incorporated by a two-parameter volume change model reported in the literature. In this paper, a 2×2 pile group in liquefiable soil is considered and a parametric study is conducted to investigate its seismic behavior. The effects of loading intensity and stiffness of the soil on the seismic behaviour of the soil-pile system are investigated, considering nonlinearity and liquefaction of the soil medium for a wide range of frequencies of harmonic excitations. The inertial interaction attributable to a structure is analyzed for a system consisting of a four-storied portal frame on the pile group-soil subsystem. The responses of the structure are investigated for harmonic excitation and transient excitations. The importance of consideration of nonlinearity and liquefaction of the soil medium for analysis and design of a pile-supported structure is highlighted. Results from an analysis considering a practical soil-pile problem are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the developed algorithm for a practical problem.     

Parametric Study of Concrete Integral Abutment Bridges

A parametric study was conducted to extend the results of an experimental program on a concrete integral abutment (IA) bridge in Rochester, MN to other integral abutment bridges with different design variables including pile type, size, orientation, depth of fixity, and type of surrounding soil, fixity of the connection between the abutment pile cap and abutment diaphragm, bridge span and length, and size and orientation of the wingwalls. The numerical results indicated that bridge length and soil types surrounding the piles had a significant impact on the behavior of IA bridges. To select pile type and orientation, there is a need to balance the stresses in the piles with the stresses in the superstructure for long IA bridges or IA bridges in stiff soils. Plastic hinge formation is possible at the pile section near the pile head for combined critical variables, such as long span, compliant piles in weak axis bending, deep girders, and stiff soils. Because large pile curvatures or stresses may be caused due to the rotation of the pile cap during temperature increases, hinged connections between the abutment pile cap and diaphragm are not recommended for the practice of IA bridges. Cast-in-place piles are recommended only for short-span IA bridges because their relatively large bending stiffness can cause large superstructure concrete stresses during temperature changes.     

Termination Criteria for Jacked Pile Construction and Load Transfer in Weathered Soils

Pile jacking is a piling technique that provides a noise- and vibration-free environment in the construction site. To improve termination criteria for pile jacking and to better understand the behavior of jacked piles, two steel H piles were instrumented, installed at a weathered soil site, and load tested. A set of termination criteria was applied to the test piles, which includes a minimum blow count from the standard penetration test, a specified final jacking force, a minimum of four loading cycles at the final jack force, and a specified maximum rate of pile settlement at the final jacking force. The two test piles passed all required acceptance criteria. Punching shear failure occurred at the failure load for both piles and the shaft resistance consisted of approximately 80% of the pile capacity. Based on the results of field tests in Hong Kong and Guangdong and several centrifuge tests, a relation between the ratio of the pile capacity Pult to the final jacking force PJ and the pile slenderness ratio is established. The Pult/PJ ratio is larger than 1.0 for long piles but may be smaller than 1.0 for short piles. A regression equation is established to determine the final jacking force, which is suggested as a termination criterion for jacked piles. The final jacking force can be smaller than 2.5 times the design load for very long piles, but should be larger than 2.5 times the design load for piles shorter than 37 times the pile diameter.     

Slope Stabilizing Piles and Pile-Groups: Parametric Study and Design Insights

This paper uses a hybrid method for analysis and design of slope stabilizing piles that was developed in a preceding paper by the writers. The aim of this paper is to derive insights about the factors influencing the response of piles and pile-groups. Axis-to-axis pile spacing (S), thickness of stable soil mass (Hu), depth (Le) of pile embedment, pile diameter (D), and pile group configuration are the parameters addressed in the study. It is shown that S = 4D is the most cost-effective pile spacing, because it is the largest spacing that can still generate soil arching between the piles. Soil inhomogeneity (in terms of shear stiffness) was found to be unimportant, because the response is primarily affected by the strength of the unstable soil layer. For relatively small pile embedments, pile response is dominated by rigid-body rotation without substantial flexural distortion: the short pile mode of failure. In these cases, the structural capacity of the pile cannot be exploited, and the design will not be economical. The critical embedment depth to achieve fixity conditions at the base of the pile is found to range from 0.7Hu to 1.5Hu, depending on the relative strength of the unstable ground compared to that of the stable ground (i.e., the soil below the sliding plane). An example of dimensionless design charts is presented for piles embedded in rock. Results are presented for two characteristic slenderness ratios and several pile spacings. Single piles are concluded to be generally inadequate for stabilizing deep landslides, although capped pile-groups invoking framing action may offer an efficient solution.     

Development of Downdrag on Piles and Pile Groups in Consolidating Soil

Development of pile settlement (downdrag) of piles constructed in consolidating soil may lead to serious pile foundation design problems. The investigation of downdrag has attracted far less attention than the study of dragload over the years. In this paper, several series of two-dimensional axisymmetric and three-dimensional numerical parametric analyses were conducted to study the behavior of single piles and piles in 3×3 and 5×5 pile groups in consolidating soil. Both elastic no-slip and elasto-plastic slip at the pile–soil interface were considered. For a single pile, the downdrag computed from the no-slip elastic analysis and from the analytical elastic solution was about 8–14 times larger than that computed from the elasto-plastic slip analysis. The softer the consolidating clay, the greater the difference between the no-slip elastic and the elasto-plastic slip analyses. For the 5×5 pile group at 2.5 diameter spacing, the maximum downdrag of the center, inner, and corner piles was, respectively, 63, 68, and 79% of the maximum downdrag of the single pile. The reduction of downdrag inside the pile group is attributed to the shielding effects on the inner piles by the outer piles. The relative reduction in downdrag (Wr) in the 5×5 pile group increases with an increase in the relative bearing stiffness ratio (Eb/Ec), depending on the pile location in the group. Compared with the relative reduction in dragload (Pr), Wr at the corner pile is less affected by the group interaction for a given surcharge load. This suggests that the use of sacrificing piles outside the pile group will be more effective on Pr than on Wr. Based on the three cases studied, the larger the number of piles in a group, the greater the shielding effects on Wr. Relatively speaking, Wr is more sensitive to the total number of piles than to the pile spacing within a pile group.