不同品种磷肥在土壤中的退化研究

对钙镁磷肥（FMP）、过磷酸钙（SSP）和部分酸化磷肥（PAPR）在河南郑州西岗沙土和河南西华县潮土中的退化情况进行了研究。     

Unacidulated and Partially acidulated phosphate rock: Agronomic effectiveness and the rates of dissolution of phosphate rock

The agronomic effectiveness of unground North Carolina phosphate rock (PR) and partially acidulated phosphate rocks (PAPR) prepared by acidulation of the PR with 30%, 40% and 50% of the phosphoric acid needed for complete acidulation, was determined in a 4 year field experiment on permanent pastures. The soil developed from volcanic ash, and was highly P retentive. The rate of dissolution in soil of the PR component in PAPR and of PR applied directly was measured, together with bicarbonate extractable P. The priming effect of the monocalcium phosphate (MCP) component of PAPR on root growth was also investigated.Pasture yields showed that even the 30% acidulated PAPR was as effective as fully acidulated triple superphosphate (TSP), mainly due to the high reactivity of the PR used. The 50% acidulated PAPR tended to be superior to TSP. Soluble P in PAPR caused a marked increase in root proliferation, and dry matter yields were greater than predicted from the amounts of MCP and PR in PAPR. Directly applied PR was inferior to TSP in years 1 and 2 but was equal in year 4. (There was no pasture response to application of P fertilizers in year 3.)Dissolution rates of the PRs were determined applying a cubic model to PR dissolution data. The rate of dissolution increased with increasing acidulation and this is tentatively ascribed to increased root proliferation around PAPR granules and acidification of the clover rhizosphere during nitrogen fixation.     

A discussion of the methods for comparing the relative effectiveness of phosphate fertilizers varying in solubility

Because various phosphate (P) fertilizers differ widely in their solubility, it is commonly observed that crop response to P fertilizers varies under the same soil and crop conditions. Furthermore, a major problem encountered in the methods for determining the relative effectiveness (RE) of water-insoluble P fertilizer (e.g., phosphate rock) with respect to water-soluble P fertilizers, e.g., single superphosphate (SSP) and triple superphosphate (TSP), is that their growth response curves are usually nonlinear and often do not share a common maximum yield. In this paper, we review and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the three most commonly used methods for calculating the RE of phosphate rock with respect to TSP (or SSP). The three methods are vertical comparison, horizontal (substitution rate) comparison, and linear-response comparison.     

Preparation,forms and properties of controlled-release phosphate fertilizers

Controlled-release phosphate fertilizers include phosphate rocks (PRs) for direct application, partially acidulated phosphate rocks (PAPRs) and thermal phosphates. Phosphate rocks contain apatite as the main P containing mineral, the composition and the chemical nature of which vary between PRs. Based on the solubility in chemical extractants PRs are broadly grouped into ‘reactive’ and ‘unreactive’. The ‘reactivity’ of PRs is influenced strongly by the extent of carbonate substitution for phosphate in the apatite minerals. Under certain soil and climatic conditions reactive PRs (RPRs) can be used as a source of P for direct application. Partially acidulated phosphate rocks (PAPRs) are produced either by direct partial acidulation of PRs with mineral acids or by mixing PRs with fully acidulated superphosphate reaction mixtures. Partial acidulation of PRs with H₃PO₄ generally results in higher water soluble P contents than those acidulated with H₂SO₄. Mixing of RPRs with superphosphate reaction mixtures sometimes results in the preferential consumption of free acid and thereby increases the amounts of residual unreacted PRs. Thermal phosphates are produced by either heating PRs below melting point both in the presence and the absence of silica (calcined phosphates) or heating PRs with silica above melting point (fused phosphate). These phosphates are alkaline in nature and hence suitable for acidic soils.     

Partially acidulated phosphate rocks: Controlled release phosphorus fertilizers for more sustainable agriculture

Phosphate rocks partially acidulated either with H₃PO₄ or H₂SO₄ were compared against SSP or TSP as phosphate fertilizers for permanent pasture. Eleven field trials were conducted over periods of up to 6 yrs. Fertilizers were surface applied annually. Initial soil pHw values ranged from 5.5–6.3 and Soil P retention from 25% to 97%. The PRs used for partial acidulation were unground or ground North Carolina PR, ground Khouribga PR, and a blend of ground PRs of North Carolina, Arad and Khouribga PRs. From the DM yields, fertilizer substitution values were calculated: fertilizer substitution value was the ratio of total P applied as superphosphate to total P as PAPR required to produce the same DM yield.Rates of dissolution of the PR component of PAPRs were also determined in soils collected from two trials.Agronomic results demonstrated that 30% acidulated phosphoric PAPRs (about 50% of total P as water-soluble P) were as effective as TSP, when the PR acidulated was from unground North Carolina PR. Results from one field trial indicated that when PAPR was from ground North Carolina PR, 20% acidulated product (water-soluble P 30–40% of total P) was equally effective as TSP. Replacement of ground North Carolina PR by a less reactive Khouribga PR did not appear to decrease the yield. Results indicated that per unit P released into soil solution, PAPRs were more efficient fertilizers than TSP. With annual applications, fertilizer substitution value of PAPR 30% tended to increase with time.Sulphuric PAPRs prepared from North Carolina PR were generally inferior to phosphoric PAPRs containing similar amounts of water-soluble P. This was attributed to the presence of CaSO₄ coatings.Abbreviations DM Dry matter - PAPR Partially acidulated phosphate rock - PR Phosphate rock - SSP Single superphosphate - TSP Triple superphosphate     

Induced phosphorus fixation and the effectiveness of phosphate fertilizers derived from Sukulu Hills phosphate rock

A greenhouse study was conducted with two surface, acidic soils (a Hiwassee loam and a Marvyn loamy sand) to measure the effect of increasing P-fixation capacity, on the relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) of phosphate fertilizers derived from Sukulu Hills phosphate rock (PR) from Uganda. Prior to fertilizer application, Fe-gel was added to increase P-fixation capacity from 4.4 to 14.3% for the Marvyn soil and from 37.0 to 61.5% for the Hiwassee soil. Phosphate materials included compacted Sukulu Hills concentrate PR + Triple superphosphate (CTSP) at a total P ratio of PR:TSP = 50:50; 50% partially acidulated PR (CPAPR) from Sukulu Hills concentrate PR made with H₂SO₄; and Sukulu Hills concentrate PR (PRC) made by magnetically removing iron oxide from raw PR ore. Triple superphosphate (TSP) was used as a reference fertilizer. After adjusting soil pH to approximately 6, P sources were applied at rates of 0, 50, 150, and 300 mg total P kg^–1 soil. Two successive crops of 5 week old corn seedlings (Zea mays L.) were grown. The results show that the RAE of the phosphate materials measured using dry-matter yield or P uptake generally decreased as P-fixation capacity was increased for both soils. CTSP was more effective in increasing dry-matter yield and P uptake than CPAPR. PRC alone was an ineffective P source. Soil chemical analysis showed that Bray 1 and Mehlich 1 extractants were ineffective on the high P-fixation capacity Fe-gel amended Hiwassee soil. Mehlich 1 was unsuitable for soils treated with PRC since it apparently solubilizes unreactive PR. When all of the soils and P sources were considered together, Pi paper was the most reliable test for estimating plant available P.     

The role of soil pH in the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers

The influence of soil pH on the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers was investigated in laboratory experiments with reactive North Carolina phosphate rock (PR) in a lateritic soil adjusted to several pH values. Increased soil pH resulted in decreased dissolution as estimated by the increase in exchangeable calcium (Ca) method. The extent of PR dissolution was related to soil pH by an equation of the form Log Ca = a–b pH, and it increased with contact period and rate of PR application. Increased plant available P, as estimated by NaHCO₃ soluble-P (BicP) was about one third of the P dissolved from PR. BicP was related to soil pH by an equation of the form Log Bic P = c–d pH. Dissolution of PR in soil can be considered as a simple chemical reaction between apatite and hydrogen ions supplied by soil constituents.     

Effect of solubility of applied phosphate on the growth of narrow-leafed Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)

The response of narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L. cv. Illyarrie) to phosphorus (P) fertilizer applied as single superphosphate (super), as an elemental-sulphur-enriched, partially acidulated rock phosphate (esparp) and as biosuper, was investigated in a glasshouse pot trial. Measurements of plant yield and P uptake were recorded 41 and 76 days after sowing. Both dry matter production and P uptake from esparp and super were proportional to the amount of water soluble P added to the pots indicating that the non-water-soluble fractions from these fertilizers were not taken up by the lupin plants. A small amount of initially insoluble P from the higher rates of biosuper was taken up by day 76. Thus superphosphate was clearly the most effective P source for this lupin species followed by esparp while biosuper was ineffective. Similar responses were recorded for pod and nodule dry weights. It was concluded that less soluble P sources were not suitable as fertilizers in lupin production due to the poor response in P uptake, dry matter accumulation and nodulation.     

The determination of phosphate availability for some less conventional phosphate fertilisers

More than in the case of the other major fertiliser elements the performance of phosphorus in fertilisers in dependent on the state of chemical combination of the element. As distinct from typical American practice where fully acidulated fertilisers are emphasised, some other countries have moved in part to production of materials of less than full acidulation where some reliance is placed on the reactivity of the original phosphate rock. Solutions of various aliphatic acids and their salts have been used as tests for the availability of phosphorus in fully acidulated fertilisers and, to a degree, for phosphate rocks themselves. Less than fully acidulated products are at present assessed in the same way as fully acidulated materials, but in this and other evaluations problems and anomalies arise which are discussed within the framework of a number of fertiliser systems. Analytical data are adduced which illustrate the effects of some extraneous cations on the results achieved which conflict with some previous opinions. Research towards a fuller understanding of the subject is suggested.     

Dissolution of phosphate rocks in soils. 1. Evaluation of extraction methods for the measurement of phosphate rock dissolution

The dissolution of phosphate rock (PR) in soil was determined by measuring the amount of either the dissolved inorganic phosphate (Pi) and Ca or the residual P and Ca remaining as undissolved PR in the soil. The dissolved Pi was extracted by either 0.5M NaOH or 0.5M NaHCO₃ and the dissolved Ca was extracted using either 0.5M BaCl₂/triethanolamine (TEA) or 1M NH₄OAc. Undissolved PR was extracted by 1M HCl following the extraction with either 0.5M NaOH or 0.5M BaCl₂/TEA.From the mixture of PR with dry soil, the 0.5M NaOH extracted between <0.1 and 4.7% of the undissolved Pi and the 0.5M BaCl₂/TEA extracted between 2.8 to 7.8% of the undissolved Ca. From PR incubated with moist soil, these reagents extracted most of the dissolved Pi or Ca (95 to 99%). The 0.5M NaHCO₃ extracted between < 0.1 to 4.8% of the undissolved Pi and the 1M NH₄OAc extracted between 5.2 to 10.5% of the undissolved Ca from the PR/dry soil mixture. However the extraction of dissolved Pi and Ca from PR incubated with moist soil by these reagents was incomplete (30 to 80%). The 0.5M NaHCO₃ and 1M NH₄OAc extractants tended to underestimate the extent of PR dissolution when the levels of dissolved Pi and Ca were high. The difference between the amounts of 0.5M NaOH extractable Pi (P) and 0.5M BaCl₂/TEA extractable Ca (Ca) in the PR-treated soil and in the soil alone gave a more accurate estimate of the extent of PR dissolution in laboratory incubated soils. However, under field conditions where the Pi and Ca released during the dissolution of PR can be removed by plant uptake and leaching, these two methods, which measure the amount of the dissolution products, may underestimate the extent of dissolution. Under these conditions, the amount of residual P or Ca extracted by 1M HCl is recommended as the best estimate of the amount of undissolved PR remaining in soil.     

Partially acidulated reactive phosphate rock (PAPR) fertilizer and its reactions in soil

PAPR was made by partial acidulation of North Carolina phosphate rock with H₃PO₄. The PAPRs were incubated in bands in columns of two soils of contrasting P retention. The columns were sampled after freezing and sectioning with a cryomicrotome. The movement of P in soil incubated with³³P-labelled PAPR was followed by autoradiography of polished epoxy impregnated sections of the freeze-dried soil column. PAPR solubility was also studied by a sequential dialysis process using distilled deionised water. The acid solution resulting from the dissolution of monocalcium phosphate (MCP) in PAPR moved into the surrounding soil, solubilizing soil minerals and creating a low-pH front with a high concentration of P. Depending on the soil, phosphorus moved 6–14 mm away from the fertilizer/soil interface by mass flow and diffusion in two days. The increase in 0.5 M NaOH extractable P above that of untreated soil showed a maximum at the same position as the pH minimum in the soil. In both soils, the total P movement from the fertilizer band after a two day period for 50% PAPR was comparable to that for 100% acidulation (triple superphosphate), indicating that acidulations above 50% did not necessarily increase the movement of soluble P from the fertilizer pellet. Variations in pH in the fertilizer-affected soil could be explained by the net balance of acidity resulting from incoming acid P solution and release of OH^– during P sorption. The rock residue exhibited a transient loss in solubility which was reversed on subsequent dissolution, suggesting a possible surface alteration.     

Phosphate rock and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as phosphate fertilizers and their dissolution in soil

A field trial was conducted for 3 years to evaluate phosphate rocks and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as fertilizers for permanent pastures. Two reactive phosphate rocks, North Carolina (USA) and Chatham Rise (New Zealand), and an unreactive Florida (USA) were used. The materials were applied to a highly phosphate retentive allophanic soil of medium to high phosphorus status. Single superphosphate was employed as the standard fertilizer. The fertilizers were applied at four rates including a control in the first year and again in the third year. The field design enabled measurement of residual effects as well. All the plots received blanket applications of sulphate. The rate of dissolution of phosphate rock was measured by determining soil inorganic phosphate fractions at the highest rate of fertilizer application.The reactive phosphate rocks applied with or without sulphur were as effective as superphosphate in the first and third year of the trial respectively under low and medium responsive conditions. The Florida rock was at the best only 55% as effective as superphosphate. When applied after granulating with sulphur the value increased to 72%. In the second year there was no greater residual effect from the phosphate rocks compared with superphosphate. However, in the third year reactive phosphate rocks gave a slightly greater residual effect; averaged over rates of application the yield increase was 23% over control compared with 18% for superphosphate.The reactive phosphate rocks, applied with or without sulphur, dissolved at the rate of 44% of that added in the first year and 62% of that remaining in the second year. The corresponding values for Florida rock were 27% and 30%, and for Florida with elemental sulphur 35% and 33%. Over 3 years about 96% of the reactive rocks dissolved compared with 56% and 78% in the case of Florida and Florida with sulphur respectively.     

Differential influence of soil pH on the availability of partially sulphuric and phosphoric acidulated phosphate rocks II. Chemical and scanning elecronmicroscopic studies

Part I of this study showed that the plant availability of P from a reactive phosphate rock (PR), North Carolina PR, partially acidulated with phosphoric acid (Phos-PAPR) increased with decreasing soil pH from pH 6.1 to 5.1, whereas availability from a blend of similarly reactive PRs partially acidulated with sulphuric acid (SA-PAPR) changed little. The present study was carried out to explain the above results. Phosphate sorption maximum of soil as a function of soil pH was determined. Soil samples obtained at the completion of the pot experiment [5] were analysed for inorganic P fractions, and the amounts of PR dissolved from the PAPRs were determined. A leaching study, simulating pot experiment conditions, was conducted to determine the changes in the chemical composition and the spatial distribution of P, S and Ca in the fertilizer residues. The properties of the PAPRs were further characterised by sequential extraction of the fertilizers. Phosphate sorption isotherms indicated a smaller amount of P in solution at lower pH values, which suggested reduced P availability with decreasing soil pH. Dissolution of the residual PR-P was generally greater in Phos-PAPR treatment than in PR applied directly or in the SA-PAPR treatment. PR-P dissolution in Phos-PAPR increased with decreasing pH but not in SA-PAPR. Chemical, electron microprobe, X-ray micro-analysis and X-ray powder diffraction studies of the fertilizer residues obtained from the leaching and sequential extraction experiments showed rapid dissolution of the Ca(H₂PO₄)₂ phase of the fertilizers but the CaSO₄.XH₂O persisting as a cementing phase between the PR particles. The CaSO₄.XH₂O which intially existed mostly in an anhydrous form changed to gypsum. It was concluded that the dissolution of PR-P in the SA-PAPR was impeded by the presence of CaSO₄.XH₂O acting as a physical barrier and also by providing higher Ca in solution than that would exist in a saturated solution of the apatites. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Single superphosphate - reactive phosphate rock mixtures. 3. The use of concentration ratios of elements to identify the nature and amounts of unacidulated rock residues in the mixtures

Water insoluble residues (WIR) of unreactive phosphate rocks in single superphosphate-reactive phosphate rock (SSP-RPR) mixtures are considered to reduce the agronomic value of these mixtures. A technique using concentration ratios of elements to identify the quantities of WIR of ground North Carolina (NC), ground Nauru and as received NC phosphate rocks in a SSP-RPR was developed. Of 22 elements tested P/Sr ratios were found to be the only element ratios that could be used to distinguish between WIR's derived from Nauru and NC. P/Sr ratios in Nauru and NC were markedly different and provided a useful index for differentiating between the two rocks. During acidulation the P/Sr concentration ratio remained essentially constant in the WIR's from both rocks.Using the element ratio technique the percentage of total P in the SSP-RPR sample was determined to be 60-61% water soluble, 5% water insoluble Nauru, 2% water insoluble ground NC and 32-33% water insoluble as received NC.The element ratio technique developed in this study can be applied to partially acidulated P fertilizers made with rocks other than NC and Nauru provided elements which satisfy the same conditions as Sr in this study can be found.     

An evaluation of the agronomic potential of partially acidulated rock phosphates in calcareous soil

The agronomic potential of four partially acidulated rock phosphates (PARP) made from a moderate reactive phosphate rock at 30 or 60 percent acidulation either by sulfuric acid alone or by combination of sulfuric and phosphoric acids was compared with that of monocalcium phosphate (MCP) and ground rock phosphate (RP) on a calcareous soil (Typic Hapluquent, pH 8.5) in greenhouse. Dry weight and P accumulation of successive cuttings of ryegrass shoots were used to evaluate the relative agronomic potential of these fertilizers. Results indicated that PARPs of higher water-soluble P content had similar immediate effectiveness as MCP at two earlier cuttings, however, they produced significantly less total dry matter than MCP did in overall six successive cuttings. PARPs were constantly inferior to MCP in terms of P uptake by plant in all the six cuttings. When compared to RP, on the other hand, PARPs had markedly higher relative effectiveness. RP itself affected neither the dry matter production nor the P uptake by plant as compared to control treatment.Fractionation of residual inorganic P in the soil samples at two time intervals during plant growth indicated that MCP-P mainly transformed to dicalcium phosphate and octacalcium phosphate, and to a less extent to Fe and Al associated P. These forms of P had significant correlation with P accumulation by plant. Raw RP did not subject to transformation after applied to the soil regardless the duration of culture time. No obvious dissolution of unreacted RP in PARP materials was detected. Plant dry matter production and P uptake were mainly correlated with water-soluble P added with the fertilizers. It is suggested from the experiment that although partial acidulation could substantially improved the effectiveness of rock phosphate and the immediate effect of the fertilizer was competitive with MCP, application of PARP to calcareous soils is only of short-term benefits; in a long run this fertilizer is not considered as a desirable source of P in calcareous soils since the unacidulated part in the fertilizer was unable to be solubilized in the alkaline conditions.     

Greenhouse evaluation of agronomic potential of different sources of phosphate fertilizer in a typical concretionary soil of Northern Ghana

The concretionary soils of Northern Ghana, which are near neutral with respect to pH and which comprise mostly lateritic ferruginous nodules are known to sorb significant amounts of phosphate. Instead of imported superphosphate, the use of less expensive indigenous Togo rock phosphate (PR) or partially acidulated (50%) Togo rock phosphate (PAPR-50), are possible alternative phosphate fertilizer options for these soils. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of freshly-applied SSP, PR and PAPR-50, and the effectiveness of the residues of these fertilizers in a glasshouse pot study. Laboratory studies were also undertaken to study the transformation of these fertilizers after their application to the concretionary ferruginous soils. In the greenhouse study, yield of dried tops and the P uptake by the tops of maize var. Dobidi (Zea mays) was used to measure fertilizer effectiveness. One level of P was applied for each fertilizer (26.4 kg P ha^–1). Plants were grown for 28 days. After harvesting the first crop, subsequent cropping was carried out to evaluate the effects of the residual P in the pots. The results showed that increases in dry matter yield of shoot and total P uptake followed the trend SSP > PAPR-50 > PR > control. The relative agronomic effciency (RAE) of PAPR-50 was 58% that of commercial SSP in increasing growth of the crop, while that of PR was only 23%. The residual effect of either PAPR-50 or PR on dry matter yield and total P uptake was found to be negligible compared with SSP, suggesting that apatitic P was poorly effective relative to SSP in the used soils. The P fractionation results confirmed that PR and PAPR-50 did not significantly increase any of the P fractions in either the soil fines or nodules after the first crop. By contrast, application of SSP increased all extractable Pi fractions, most of the P added being recovered from the nodules in forms associated with Fe (hydroxide and residual Pi).It is concluded that, relative to SSP, the P from residues of PAPR-50 and PR are poorly effective in the soils studied for sustainable plant production.     

The agronomic effectiveness of reactive rock phosphate,partially acidulated rock phosphate and monocalcium phosphate in soils of different pH

The initial and residual fertilizer effectiveness of North Carolina RP (rock phosphate), monocalcium phosphate and partially acidulated RP (made from North Carolina RP at 30% acidulation), both granulated and non-granulated, were measured in a glasshouse experiment. Triticale (xTriticosecale) was grown for 30 days on a soil that had been adjusted to three pH values (4.2, 5.2 and 6.2). Two crops were grown with a six month interval between crops. The effectiveness of the different fertilizers was compared using relationships between (1) yield of dried tops and the amount of P applied and (2) P content (P concentration in tissue multiplied by yield) and the amount of P applied. For the first crop, relative effectiveness (RE) of the fertilizers was calculated relative to granulated monocalcium phosphate, the most effective fertilizer. Monocalcium phosphate was not applied to the second crop, so relative residual effectiveness (RRE) was estimated for each fertilizer relative to the residual effectiveness of granulated monocalcium phosphate.The relative effectiveness of granulated monocalcium phosphate (band application) was greater (RE = 1.00) than of North Carolina RP (0.01–0.02) and partially acidulated RP (0.45–0.76) for all three soil pH values for the first crop. Granulation and band application increased the effectiveness of monocalcium phosphate and partially acidulated RP, but reduced the effectiveness of North Carolina RP. Both non-granulated monocalcium phosphate and partially acidulated RP were less effective than granulated partially acidulated RP for both crops. For the second crop granulated monocalcium phosphate was most effective and the RRE of non-granulated partially acidulated RP (0.16–0.32) and North Carolina RP (0.19–0.28) was greater than for non-granulated monocalcium phosphate (0.12). For the more acidic soil the RE of non-granulated North Carolina RP was four times higher than for the high pH soil for the first crop and 60% higher for the second crop, but it was still poorly effective relative to granulated monocalcium phosphate. Granulated North Carolina RP was least effective among all the fertilizers for all soil pH values and for both crops.     

Influence of pH,time and rate of application on phosphate rock dissolution and availability to pastures

Soil Samples were collected from a field experiment conducted to evaluate the agronomic effectiveness of a reactive phosphate rock (PR), Sechura sand, relative to that of monocalcium phosphate (MCP) at different soil pHs and rates of application. The samples were analysed for P soluble in the soil solution and bicarbonate extractable P. The rate of dissolution of PR was calculated from the data on the fractionation of inorganic P. In MCP plots P in the soil solution decreased sharply with time especially at low pHs and high rates of fertiliser application. In PR plots the concentration remained with time at the same as or a slightly higher level than that was found one month after application. Solution concentration of P was lower at very high rates of PR application than at intermediate rates. In both MCP and PR plots bicarbonate extractable P decreased with increasing pH. Bicarbonate extractable P was linearly related to MCP but not to PR applied. The rate of dissolution and the proportion of PR dissolved decreased with increasing rates of PR application but the amount dissolved increased. Phosphate dissolved at high level of PR application did not seem to enhance proportionately either the concentration of P in soil solution or bicarbonate extractable P.     

Evaluation of partially acidulated phosphate fertilisers and reactive phosphate rock for hill pastures

The initial and residual effectiveness of two partially acidulated fertilisers, a single superphosphate (SSP): reactive phosphate rock (RPR) physical mix (SSP:RPR) and a partially acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR), and a RPR, North Carolina, were compared with SSP at two phosphate (P)-responsive sites in hill country. One site had received small annual inputs of SSP (125 kg ha^–1 y^–1) fertiliser for 10 years (LF) and the other site no SSP in the past 5 years (NF). The SSP, PAPR and RPR were applied at 3 rates (20, 40 and 60 kg P ha^–1) and SSP:RPR at one rate (40 kg P ha^–1) once only in the first year. Fertiliser treatments were applied with or without Grasslands Huia white clover (Trifolium repens L.) seed. Initial and residual pasture and legume responses were measured over two years.In the first year, pasture and legume response to applied P was much greater at the LF than NF site. A deterioration in legume content and vigour brought about by withholding fertiliser, rather than a difference in soil-fertiliser reactions, appears to be the main reason for the different response at the two sites in the first year. At the LF site the fully (SSP) and partially (SSP:RPR and PAPR) acidulated fertilisers were far more effective in stimulating legume growth than the RPR, while at the NF site no differences in pasture or legume production were found between fertilisers in the first year. Where fertiliser has been withheld for a number of years the use of SSP appears to be a wasteful and inefficient use of a processed fertiliser.Residual effects of RPR were greater than those of SSP, as shown by the greater yield of legume at both sites in the second year. The residual effectiveness of both the partially acidulated materials was much less than that of the RPR. Mixing and sowing white clover with the fertilisers had some beneficial effects on legume content at the NF site in both years and improved legume production at this site in the second year.     

Comparison of Olsen and Pi soil tests for evaluating phosphorus bioavailability in a calcareous soil treated with single superphosphate and partially acidulated phosphate rock

The Pi test for phosphorus (P) is a new method in which strips of iron oxide impregnated filter paper are used as a sink to sorb and extract P from a soil solution. In a greenhouse experiment, the Olsen and Pi tests were compared for their effectiveness in evaluating P availability to maize on calcareous soils. Phosphate rock from Togo, partially acidulated with H₂SO₄ at 50% acidulation level (PAPR 50% H₂SO₄) and single superphosphate (SSP) were applied at different rates to a calcareous soil (Vernon Clay, pH 8.2, CaCO₃ 18.9%) which was preincubated with KH₂PO₄ to raise plant-available P to different levels. In soils treated with SSP, dry-matter yield of maize correlated equally well with Pi-P and with Olsen-P (r = 0.96^***). P uptake correlated significantly with P_i-P (r = 0.94^***) as well as Olsen-P (r = 0.97^***). Likewise, in soils fertilized with PAPR, significant correlations were found between dry-matter yield and Pi-P (r = 0.97^***) and between dry-matter yield and Olsen-P (r = 0.94^***). When all the data were pooled, Pi-P and Olsen-P correlated equally well with both dry-matter weight (r = 0.97^***) and P uptake (r = 0.94^***). Phosphorus extracted by the Pi test correlated significantly with P extracted by the Olsen test (r = 0.99^***).