Comparison in survival between hepatic metastases of gastric and colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND/AIM: The outcome after hepatectomy and non-surgical treatment of liver metastases from gastric and colorectal malignancies are reported. METHODOLOGY: Between April 1988 and March 1994, 176 patients with metastatic liver cancer were treated at the First Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital. RESULTS: All patients received multi-disciplinary treatment, and 51 underwent hepatectomy. The survival after hepatectomy for metastatic liver cancer from a colorectal primary was better than that for gastric cancer. The survival after hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) therapy for metastases from gastric cancer was better than that for colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection may be the best treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. HAI may be a better option for liver metastases from gastric cancer.     

Treatment of colorectal cancer: hepatic metastasis

Almost one-third of patients dying from colorectal cancer have tumor limited to the liver. Systemic chemotherapy is the appropriate palliative management of patients with metastases to the liver and other sites. For many patients with isolated hepatic metastases, systemic chemotherapy is also the most appropriate treatment. However, results with systemic chemotherapy indicate that one-third or less of patients will respond to such treatments, and long-term survival is rare. In this report we provide information concerning the natural history of colorectal hepatic metastases, followed by the expected benefits with systemic chemotherapy. This information provides background for the regional therapeutic strategies of surgical resection, cryosurgery, and hepatic artery chemotherapy. We discuss the selection factors appropriate for such treatments, morbidity and mortality, and the potential long-term benefits of such approaches. The last section focuses on surgical considerations in hepatic resection and hepatic artery chemotherapy.     

Functional role of CD95 ligand in concanavalin A-induced intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte cytotoxicity

OBJECTIVE: To update the analysis of technical and biologic factors related to hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis in a large single-institution series to identify important prognostic indicators and patterns of failure. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical therapy for colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver is the only potentially curable treatment. Careful patient selection of those with resectable liver-only metastatic disease is crucial to the success of surgical therapy. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. Variables examined included sex, stage of primary lesion, size of liver lesion(s), number of lesions, disease-free interval, ploidy, differentiation, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, and operative factors such as resection margin, use of cryotherapy, intraoperative ultrasound, and blood loss. RESULTS: Surgical margin, number of lesions, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels significantly control prognosis. Patients with only one or two liver lesions, a 1-cm surgical margin, and low CEA levels have a 5-year disease-free survival rate of more than 30%. Disease-free interval, original stage, bilobar involvement, size of metastasis, differentiation, and ploidy were not significant predictors of recurrence. The pattern of failure correlates with surgical margin. Routine use of intraoperative ultrasound resulted in an increased incidence of negative surgical margin during the period examined. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection or cryotherapy of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer is safe and curable in appropriately selected patients. Biologic factors, such as number of lesions and carcinoembryonic antigen levels, determine potential curability, and surgical margin governs the patterns of failure and outcome in potentially curable patients. Optimization of selection criteria and surgical resection margins will improve outcome.     

Resection for multiple metastatic liver tumors after portal embolization

BACKGROUND: Five patients with bilateral multiple liver metastases (3 to 12 lesions) from colorectal cancer who underwent extensive liver resection after portal embolization are described. METHODS: Portal embolization of the right portal branch was performed 9 days to 8 months before hepatic resection. The location and number of metastases were determined by intraoperative ultrasonography at the time of liver resection to accomplish complete resection of the tumors. Extended right lobectomy was carried out in four patients, two of whom underwent additional wedge resection of nodules located in the left lateral segment. The other patient underwent right lobectomy associated with local resection of the tumor in the left lobe. RESULTS: The postoperative course in the five patients was uneventful, with no serious complication or liver dysfunction. Although one patient died of recurrence 28 months after liver resection, the remaining four patients were alive and free of cancer between 36 and 74 months after hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of bilateral multiple (four or more) metastatic liver lesions from colorectal cancer is not considered a contraindication for hepatic resection if thorough examination of the liver is performed with intraoperative ultrasonography and the surgical risk is minimal. Portal embolization appears effective for increasing the safety of hepatectomy for patients with small metastases who require major right-sided resection combined with wedge resection of the left lobe.     

Determinants of survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer

Hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This retrospective review study was undertaken in an attempt to identify factors that influence patient survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. From January 1978 to December 1993, a total of 301 patients underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. Of those, 245 patients had one resection, 44 had two resections, and 12 had three resections. For all patients the overall median survival was 20.6 months, operative mortality was 1.1%, and overall morbidity was 17.2%. Average hospital stay was 9 days. Statistical analysis included univariate analysis using log rank comparisons, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression. The statistically significant factors that influenced survival were distribution of liver metastases, unilobar versus bilobar (p = 0.0001), resected versus nonresected (p < 0.0001), and tumor-free surgical margins versus positive margins (p = 0.001). Surprisingly, the disease-free interval and the original stage of the primary tumor did not predict survival (p = not significant). Other factors that had no influence on survival were type of resection, size and number of liver metastases, ABO blood group, and the number of perioperative blood transfusions. For those patients who underwent resection of unilobar metastases with tumor-free margins, the 5-year survival rate was 29% with a median survival of 35 months and eight survivors > 7 years. In addition, one patient with bilobar disease had survival > 7 years and five patients who had resection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic cancer simultaneously had survival > 3 years. Our data support the concept that patients with unilobar metastatic disease who undergo surgical resection with tumor-free surgical margins can be afforded a significant opportunity at long-term survival with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. Also, certain patients with bilobar or extrahepatic disease (or both) who undergo complete resection can enjoy a long-term survival. In these subgroups of patients resection should be considered on an individual basis.     

Cryosurgical ablation of hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND: Cryosurgical ablation of hepatic tumors relies on nonspecific tissue necrosis due to freezing as well as microvascular thrombosis. Patients with selected primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies who are not candidates for surgical resection are afforded potentially curative benefit using this technique. METHODS: Forty patients underwent cryosurgery for hepatic malignancy related to colorectal metastasis (n = 27), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8), metastatic breast (n = 2), metastatic neuroendocrine (n = 2), and metastatic ovarian carcinoma (n = 1). Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was used in all patients to help locate the tumor and guide the cryosurgical trocar to the lesions. RESULTS: Indications for cryosurgical ablation included bilobar and centrally located disease, poor medical risk, insufficient hepatic reserve, and involved margin after wedge resection. Major complications included hepatic parenchyma cracking requiring transfusion in 5 patients, 1 postoperative biliary stenosis, and 1 inferior vena cava injury. There were 3 postoperative deaths from non-hepatic-related events. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis the estimated overall survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (60% at 18 months) was compared with patients with colorectal metastases (30% at 18 months). Nine patients (23%) are currently free of disease with an average follow-up of 17.7 months. The pattern of failure was identified at the site of cryosurgical ablation in 2 of 88 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Cryosurgical ablation of selected hepatic malignancies is a safe and viable treatment for patients not amenable to surgical resection.     

Is resection of pulmonary and hepatic metastases warranted in patients with colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Conventional management of stage IV colorectal carcinoma is palliative. The value of resecting both liver and lung colorectal metastases that occur in isolation of other sites of metastasis is undetermined. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to (1) assess the efficacy of resecting both hepatic and pulmonary metastases, (2) investigate the influence of the sequence and timing of metastases, and (3) identify the profile of patients likely to benefit from both hepatic and pulmonary metastasectomy. Patients and methods: Of 48 patients identified with resection of colorectal cancer and, at some point in time, both liver and lung metastases, 25 patients underwent metastasectomy (resection group). The remaining 23 patients comprised the nonresection group. Risk factors for death were identified by multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Median survival was longer after the last metastatic appearance in the resection group (16 months) than in the nonresection group (6 months; P <.001). The pattern of risk also differed; it peaked at 2 years and then declined in the resection group but was constant in the nonresection group. In the resection group, patients with metachronous resections survived longer after colorectal resection (median, 70 months) than patients with synchronous (median, 22 months) or mixed resections (median, 31 months; P <.001). Risk factors for death included older age, multiple liver metastases, and a short disease-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients with solitary metachronous metastases to the liver, then the lung, and long disease-free intervals are more likely to benefit from resection of both liver and lung metastases. Patients with risk factors also had better survival with resection than without resection.     

A pilot study of cryochemotherapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

Cryosurgery of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma is a form of local therapy for unresectable disease. After curative resection, failures occur in the liver, and at extrahepatic sites. This pilot study evaluated the toxicity and tolerance to cryotherapy and intraoperative chemotherapy for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. If after exploratory celiotomy for potential curative resection of hepatic metastases the patient was deemed unresectable because of location and/or number of lesions, cryosurgery and intraoperative chemotherapy with systemic 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 and leucovorin 500 mg/m2 was performed. Four patients were treated with cryochemotherapy. All patients developed toxicity. Two patients developed grade II leukopenia on Postoperative Days 2 and 12, and grades II and III diarrhea on Postoperative Days 5 and 7, respectively. Grade III hyperbilirubinemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient on Postoperative Days 3 and 7. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, postoperative ileus, and grade II mucositis occurred in one patient each. All patients had delays and dose reductions on their subsequent chemotherapy treatments secondary to toxicity. Two patients had disease progression, one had stable disease. and one is "disease free." Combining the tumoricidal effects of chemotherapy and cryosurgery is in theory a good concept. However, the toxicity of 5-FU and leucovorin is enhanced by this approach.     

Cytoablative therapy with combined resection and cryosurgery for limited bilobar hepatic colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Cryosurgery can be employed in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases when the tumor size and the number of metastases are limited. However, local recurrence can result from incomplete ablation. We proposed a trial of complete cytoablation with a combined approach of cryosurgery and hepatic resection for patients with bilobar hepatic metastases. METHODS: Seven patients underwent cryosurgery alone (CRYO). Seven additional patients underwent combined resection and cryosurgery (CRYO+RES) for bilobar metastases. RESULTS: In the CRYO group, 5 of 7 patients had at least one centrally located tumor. All 5 of these patients had early recurrence at the site of ablation. In the CRYO+RES group complete ablation was achieved in 7 of 7. Two (28.6%) of these patients developed local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Cytoablation of hepatic metastases can be safely achieved with combined hepatic resection and cryosurgery in selected patients. Long-term survival data are necessary before advocating widespread application of this approach.     

Gene expression of mouse S100A3, a cysteine-rich calcium-binding protein, in developing hair follicle

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To discuss the causes, clinical manifestations, and consequences of diarrhea in the patient with cancer; to describe the oncology nurse's role in the assessment, management, and treatment of cancer-related diarrhea. DATA SOURCES: Synthesis of published peer-reviewed data, professional experience. DATA SYNTHESIS: The many causes of cancer-related diarrhea include specific types of cancer and specific anticancer treatment regimens (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy). Poorly controlled diarrhea may result in a range of physiologic and psychological effects that extend beyond the patient to significant others and caregivers. Comprehensive assessment of diarrhea is the foundation for the appropriate use of pharmacologic and supportive therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Diarrhea, much like fatigue, is a symptom that only recently has become a focus of oncology nursing research and focused intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses can significantly influence the quality of care given to patients who develop diarrhea as a symptom of cancer or as a sequela of cancer therapy. As such, oncology nurses are challenged to maintain current knowledge of the causes and available treatment strategies for cancer-related diarrhea. Nurses need to rely on their experiential skill and a working knowledge of published research to identify patients at risk. They also must communicate effectively with patients and caregivers in every practice setting about the nature of diarrhea and its causes, as well as develop appropriate interventions for each individual.     

Indication of prophylactic hepatic arterial-infusion chemotherapy after hepatic resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to clarify the indication of prophylactic hepatic arterial-infusion chemotherapy (PHAIC) after hepatic resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Sixty-one patients underwent curative hepatectomy, and 27 of them were treated with PHAIC using implantable port. According to clinicopathological factors of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases, the prognoses were analyzed. In conclusion, PHAIC was not useful for patients who had distant lymph node metastases (paraaortic lymph node) from primary cancer.     

Randomized trial of surgery versus surgery followed by adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases of colorectal cancer. German Cooperative on Liver Metastases (Arbeitsgruppe Lebermetastasen)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) on survival relative to resection alone in patients with radical resection of colorectal liver metastases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Nearly 40% to 50% of all patients with colorectal carcinoma develop liver metastases. Curative resection results in a 5-year survival rate of 25% to 30%. Intrahepatic recurrence occurs after a median of 9 to 12 months in up to 60% of patients. The authors hypothesized that adjuvant intraarterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) might decrease the rate of intrahepatic recurrence and improve survival in patients with radical resection of colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: Between April 5, 1991, and December 31, 1996, patients with colorectal liver metastases from 26 hospitals were stratified by the number of metastases and the site of the primary tumor and randomized to resection of the liver metastases followed by adjuvant HAI of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2 per day for 5 days as a continuous 24-hour infusion) plus folinic acid (200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days as a short infusion), or liver resection only. RESULTS: The first planned intention-to-treat interim analysis after inclusion of 226 patients and 91 events (deaths) showed a median survival of 34.5 months for patients with adjuvant therapy versus 40.8 months for control patients. The median time to progression was 14.2 months for the chemotherapy group versus 13.7 months for the control group. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities (World Health Organization), mainly stomatitis (57.6%) and nausea (55.4%), occurred in 25.6% of cycles and 62.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: According to this planned interim analysis, adjuvant HAI, when used in this dose and schedule in patients with resection of colorectal liver metastases, reduced the risk of death at best by 15%, but at worst the risk of death was doubled. Thus, the chance of detecting an expected 50% improvement in survival by the use of HAI was only 5%. Patient accrual was therefore terminated.     

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy for liver cancer over a period of 8 years

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy was performed for 27 patients with primary (3), metastatic liver cancer (21), and 3 other cases, over a period of 8 years. Chemotherapy was performed by intermittent hepatic arterial infusion of 5-FU or FAM (in case of metastatic tumor from colorectal cancer), FAM (from gastric cancer), and CDDP or Farmorubicin (HCC). Hepatic resection was performed in 10 cases of metastatic tumor from colorectal cancer, and 8 cases of 10 were curative operation. The 5-year survival rates of curative liver resection group, and non-curative liver resection or non-resection group were 57.1% and 12.5%, respectively. As is the case with metastatic cancer from gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis was poor except for one CR case of HCC. We concluded that hepatic arterial chemotherapy may be recommended for a curative resected case of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer.     

Identification of autolysosomes directly associated with proteolysis on the density gradients in isolated rat hepatocytes

BACKGROUND: More than 40% of patients who undergo curative resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma can be expected to have recurrence of the disease. The most frequent sites of recurrence are the liver (33% of patients) and lung (22%). Interest has therefore focused on treating hepatic or pulmonary metastases, or both, to improve the outcomes of these patients. Although surgical resection has become an increasingly accepted treatment for resectable localized hepatic or localized pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma, the value of aggressive surgery for the removal of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases from patients with primary colorectal carcinoma remains to be clarified. METHODS: Data on 30 patients who had undergone resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma were included in the study. RESULTS: Independent, significant prognostic features were found to be the time that hepatic or pulmonary metastases occurred and the distribution of pulmonary metastases. Median survival times were 30 months (range, 7-108 months) after resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases and 48.5 months (range, 11-149 months) after excision of the primary colorectal tumor. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival after resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases was 86.7%, 49.3%, and 43.8%, respectively. No perioperative mortality occurred. There were three cases of minor morbidity, which the authors considered acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma may help to prolong the survival of a small group of patients with these metastases.     

CT of calcified liver metastases in colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence, characteristics and prognostic significance of calcification within colorectal hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CT in 265 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer was performed. Four groups were defined: (a) calcification within liver metastases prior to therapy, (b) noncalcified liver metastases with development of calcification on therapy, (c) noncalcified liver metastases, and (d) advanced local tumour without liver metastases. The number of calcified deposits in each patient was documented. A marker lesion was analysed for character, distribution and percentage of calcification. Survival between the four groups was compared. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (11%) patients had calcified liver metastases at presentation and 10 (4%) developed calcification during chemotherapy. Analysis of a marker lesion showed that the most frequent characteristic was fine calcification with a variable distribution. The most frequent change on treatment was alteration in the extent of calcification. Calcification developing on treatment was usually central. There was no difference in survival between groups 1, 2 and 3, but groups 1, 2 and 3 had a shorter survival than group 4. CONCLUSION: Calcification of liver metastases shows a variable pattern and may develop or change during therapy. Liver metastatic calcification may not carry any prognostic significance in colorectal cancer.     

The approach to the patient with single and multiple liver metastases, pulmonary metastases, and intra-abdominal metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Recurrent colorectal carcinoma constitutes a major health care problem, with 90,000 patients diagnosed annually with metastatic disease. Recent advances have offered treatment to selected patients with liver, lung, and intra-abdominal metastases. Resection of liver secondary tumors improves 5-year survival from 0% to approximately 30% and offers the only possibility for cure. As experience mounts, hepatic surgery can be performed with quite acceptable morbidity and mortality. Adjuvant therapies are being developed that may improve results with surgery alone. Cryoablation is a new technique that appears to effectively eradicate liver tumors, but its role remains to be defined. In patients with unresectable disease, the benefit of hepatic artery infusion of chemotherapy is unproven. Resection of pulmonary metastases significantly improves survival in patients with solitary nodules. Consistent data regarding the benefit of pulmonary metastatectomy in patients with multiple nodules are not available. Combined cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy is being investigated as a treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Although selected patients may benefit, this combined treatment modality appears to be less effective in patients with colorectal cancer than with other types of cancer.     

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

The lack of other effective treatment for colorectal liver metastases makes hepatic resection a primary treatment consideration. Between January 1980 and December 1990, 26 selected patients with liver colorectal metastases who underwent hepatic resection were reviewed. The age, sex, site of primary lesion, histological grade, lymph node involvement, location, size, and number of hepatic metastases, type of hepatic resection, and preoperative CEA blood levels were documented. Complete removal with histologically negative resection margins were accomplished in 24 patients. The extent of resection performed was hepatic lobectomy in 12 patients. Segmentectomy in eight patients, and wedge resection in four patients. The 5-year survival rate was 30.5 per cent. Patients with metachronous metastases showed a better survival rate than those with synchronous lesions--46.6% versus 13.6% respectively (P = 0.08). None of the other factors studied showed a significant effect on survival. All patients were followed from the time of hepatic resection to the time of this study or death. During a median follow-up of 30.9 months, 20 patients developed recurrence of their disease (60 per cent in the liver). There was no perioperative mortality. Morbidity arose in 66.6 per cent of patients, with a majority of the complications being minor. We conclude that hepatic resection can be performed safely enough to be recommended in selected patients.     

Management strategies for colorectal liver metastases--Part II

Liver metastases are relatively common in colorectal cancer and a small proportion of patients may benefit from resection of these liver metastases. In a selected subgroup of patients, 5-year survival rates of 25-35% may be achieved following liver resection. These survival figures compare favourably with those of patients with untreated liver secondaries. In the second part of this review the surgical and non-surgical treatment options for treating colorectal liver metastases are examined in detail.     

Current data of the science and medical practice: evaluation of the discrepancies

Eleven patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer survived more than 5 years after the resection were reviewed. There were 3 (27.3%) disease-free survivors, the longest survival period was 7 years and 2 months. Compared with 41 survivors of less than 5-year duration after resection, it was shown that close follow-up after resection of the primary cancer, detecting early subclinical hepatic metastases, preoperative lower level of CEA, tumor less or equal to 5 cm in size, single metastatic nodule and radical resection were important factors influening long-term survival (P < 0.05). It is of the opinion that early diagnosis, early resection and re-resection after detecting subclinical local recurrence and metastases play important role in improving long-term response.     

Emerging strategies in the management of cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review advances in understanding the biology of cancer that will lead to new prognostic indicators and approaches for treating cancer and its metastases and to explore the implications of these developments for oncology nurses. DATA SOURCES: Published papers, abstracts, research result, package inserts, books, and personal experience. DATA SYNTHESIS: Understanding is evolving that cancer is a genetic disease that occurs when a single cell and its progeny are remarkably changed by a series of genetic mutations. A new paradigm for managing cancer is emerging that is based on new prognostic indicators, intracellular and intercellular communication, and biologic control. Potential new therapeutic strategies include gene-directed therapy, control of cellular proliferation, exploitation of cell death, inhibition of metastasis, and reversal of multidrug resistance. Many of these therapies are only beginning to enter phase I/II clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: With continued progress, doctors will be able to identify patients with the highest likelihood of experiencing recurrent or progressive disease and formulate therapeutic strategies specific for their disease and even for their individual genetic makeup. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: To remain abreast of these new and increasingly sophisticated treatments, oncology nurses must be knowledgeable about cell and cancer biology, human genetics, the immune system, a how advances in these fields are forming the foundation for new therapies. Nurses with creativity and drive will continue to lead the way in developing management strategies for patients receiving these new therapies.