An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma

Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma.     

Combined use of exhaled hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in monitoring asthma

Oxidative stress contributes to airway inflammation and exhaled hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO) are elevated in asthmatic patients. We determined the concentrations of expired H2O2 and NO in 116 asthmatic (72 stable steroid-naive, 30 stable steroid-treated, and 14 severe steroid-treated unstable patients) and in 35 healthy subjects, and studied the relation between exhaled H2O2, NO, FEV1, airway responsiveness, and eosinophils in induced sputum. Both exhaled H2O2 and NO levels were elevated in steroid-naive asthmatic patients compared with normal subjects (0.72 +/- 0.06 versus 0.27 +/- 0.04 microM and 29 +/- 1.9 versus 6.5 +/- 0. 32 ppb, respectively; p < 0.001) and were reduced in stable steroid-treated patients (0.43 +/- 0.08 microM, p < 0.05, and 9.9 +/- 0.97 ppb, p < 0.001). In unstable steroid-treated asthmatics, however, H2O2 levels were increased, but exhaled NO levels were low (0.78 +/- 0.16 microM and 6.7 +/- 1.0 ppb, respectively). There was a correlation between expired H2O2, sputum eosinophils and airway hyperresponsiveness (methacholine PC20). Exhaled NO also correlated with sputum eosinophils, but not with airway hyperresponsiveness. Our findings indicate that measurement of expired H2O2 and NO in asthmatic patients provides complementary data for monitoring of disease activity.     

BAL neutrophilia in asthmatic patients. A by-product of eosinophil recruitment?

Although neutrophil number may be increased in the airways of patients with asthma, its pathogenetic role in this disorder remains unclear. We evaluated BAL of 8 normal control subjects, 30 +/- 2 years of age, and 24 patients with mild asthma: 17 patients with allergic asthma, 24 +/- 1 years of age, and 7 patients with nonallergic asthma, 30 +/- 1 years of age. The BAL of asthmatic patients showed increased numbers of neutrophils (p < 0.01), eosinophils (p < 0.01), and ciliated epithelial cells (p < 0.05) and increased concentrations of myeloperoxidase (MPO) (p < 0.01) compared with control subjects. Positive correlations were observed between the number of BAL neutrophils and eosinophils (Rs = 0.780, p < 0.0001) and between BAL neutrophil numbers and BAL MPO levels (Rs = 0.40, p < 0.05). No correlations were found between the following: (1) BAL eosinophils or neutrophils and BAL epithelial cells (p > 0.05, each comparison); (2) BAL neutrophils or eosinophils and log Pd15 methacholine (MCh) (p > 0.05, each comparison); or (3) BAL epithelial cells or log Pd15 MCh and BAL MPO (p > 0.05, each comparison). Dividing the patient population into two groups, allergic asthmatics and nonallergic asthmatics, similar BAL neutrophil, eosinophil, and epithelial cell numbers and similar MPO levels were found (p > 0.05, each comparison). In addition, the correlations between BAL neutrophils and eosinophils showed similar significance in the two patient subgroups (p > 0.05, each comparison). These results suggest that, both in allergic and nonallergic asthma, airway recruitment and activation of neutrophils occur as does parallel eosinophil migration. However, airway neutrophils do not seem to contribute significantly to epithelial cell injury or to airway hyperresponsiveness in the steady state.     

Sonographic analysis of recurrent parotitis in children: a comparative study with sialographic findings

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma show altered surface expression of the adhesion molecules CD11b and L-selectin on airway granulocytes compared with blood granulocytes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether this modulation is related to disease activity or due to transendothelial migration, we compared the CD11b and L-selectin expression on blood and induced sputum eosinophils and neutrophils between patients with asthma and normal subjects. METHODS: Eleven normal subjects (21-43 years), nine patients (21-34 years) with mild atopic asthma and 10 patients (20-47 years) with moderate to severe atopic asthma on regular treatment with inhaled steroids underwent sputum induction by inhalation of nebulized hypertonic saline (4.5%). CD11b and L-selectin expression on granulocytes from blood and DTT-homogenized sputum were analysed by flow cytometry. Eosinophils could be discriminated from neutrophils by using depolarized light scatter. Disease activity was assessed by baseline FEV1 and airway responsiveness to histamine (PC20). RESULTS: Sputum eosinophils showed higher expression of CD11b (P<0.001) and lower expression of L-selectin (P<0.001) compared with peripheral blood eosinophils. CD11b and L-selectin expression on eosinophils from blood or sputum did not differ between the three groups. Similar results were obtained for neutrophils. The PC20 in the patients with moderate-to-severe asthma was related to CD11b expression on blood (R=-0.92, P=0.001) and sputum eosinophils (R=0.75, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometry of induced sputum granulocytes from asthmatic as well as normal subjects is feasible. We conclude that the modulated expression of CD11b and L-selectin on airway granulocytes is not specific for asthmatic airway inflammation, but is probably the result of tissue migration per sé. This implies that CD11b and L-selectin expression on granulocytes in induced sputum cannot be used as marker of disease activity.     

Differential effects of NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists on the activity of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase activity in the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway of the rat

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is elevated in asthmatics, and varies with disease severity. We postulated that a respiratory virus infection increases exhaled NO levels in asthma, and examined the relationship between the virus-induced changes in exhaled NO and in airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine. In a parallel study, seven patients underwent experimental rhinovirus 16 (RV16) inoculation at days 0 and 1, whilst seven patients received placebo. Exhaled NO was measured at baseline (day 0) and at days 1, 2 and 3 after inoculation. Histamine challenges were performed prior to (day -7) and after inoculation (day 3), and were expressed as provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20). Following RV16 infection there was a significant increase in NO at days 2 and 3 as compared to baseline (median change (range): 4.2 (7.5) parts per billion (ppb), p=0.03, and 3.0 (10.1) ppb, p=0.02, respectively). Furthermore, PC20 decreased significantly following RV16 infection (mean+/-SD change in doubling dose: -0.65+/-0.54, p=0.02), whereas PC20 did not change in the placebo group (p=0.1). There was a significant correlation between the RV16-induced changes in exhaled NO levels at day 2 and the accompanying changes in PC20 at day 3 (rank correlation coefficient (rs): 0.86, p=0.01). Hence, the greater the increase in exhaled NO, the smaller the decrease in PC20. We conclude that rhinovirus infection increases exhaled nitric oxide levels in asthmatics, and that this increase is inversely associated with worsening of airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine. These results suggest that viral induction of nitric oxide synthase within the airways may play a protective role in exacerbations of asthma.     

Treatment of recurrent corneal erosion using phototherapeutic keratectomy with the excimer laser

Tachyphylaxis to methacholine has been reported in nonasthmatic subjects. In a recent study on the prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and atopy, we performed duplicate methacholine inhalation tests at a 60-min interval, in subjects with symptomatic asthma (n = 33), asymptomatic AHR (AAHR) (n = 72) and in a group of normal subjects (n = 130); 135/235 subjects were atopic. All subjects had a respiratory questionnaire, allergy skin prick tests, blood eosinophil counts and determination of total serum IgE level. In asthmatic subjects, PC20 just failed to be significantly higher on a second methacholine challenge (p = 0.09); when they were stratified according to severity of AHR and use of inhaled corticosteroids, we observed a significant increase in PC20 on the second test in asthmatic subjects with mild AHR not using corticosteroids (p < 0.01). In normal controls, PC20 methacholine was slightly increased on rechallenge (p < 0.01) as it was in those with AAHR (p < 0.01). There was no relationship between the magnitude of the change in PC20 and age, sex, baseline airway responsiveness, percent fall in FEV1 on the first challenge, atopic score, blood eosinophil counts and serum IgE levels. In conclusion, tachyphylaxis to methacholine is observed in normal or mild asthmatic subjects not using inhaled corticosteroids and in subjects with AAHR; however, in most subjects this change is of a small magnitude.     

Respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, airway responsiveness, and bronchoalveolar lymphocyte subsets in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A respiratory questionnaire was completed and spirometry, tests for lung volumes, diffusion capacity for CO, and methacholine bronchial challenge were performed in 24 outpatients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), aged 44-79, presenting in different stages of their disease. In 10 patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was also obtained. Ten of twenty-four patients had symptoms consistent with chronic bronchitis, unrelated both to smoking history and to the clinical stage. Abnormal values (< 2 SD) were found in 4 patients for total lung capacity (TLC), in 9 for vital capacity (VC), 8 for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), 11 for MEF50, 15 for MEF25 and in 7 for diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. Seven of nineteen patients had PD20FEV1 at less than 1,600 micrograms of methacholine chloride. There was a significantly negative correlation between white blood cell count and VC (r = 0.41, P < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between PD20FEV1 and FEV1/VC (r = 0.61, P < 0.01). The mean and SEM for BAL cells/ml was 463 (71.8) x 10(3). No leukemic cells but a marked increase in T lymphocytes (32.5 +/- 7.8%) were found in BAL fluid. There were significantly negative correlations between the number of BAL CD3+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.61, P < 0.05), and between the number of BAL CD8+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with B-CLL have a high prevalence of respiratory symptoms, small airway dysfunction and CD8 "alveolitis" related to airway responsiveness; despite the well-known lung interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in B-CLL, leukemic cells are not found in BAL fluid.     

The advantages of the lateral decubitus position after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric tetracaine

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is widely prevalent in asthmatic patients. Eosinophilic airway inflammation is considered to be a major factor in the pathogenesis of asthma. However, the effects of eosinophilic airway inflammation on EIB have been elucidated insufficiently. To examine the relationship between the severity of EIB and eosinophilic inflammation, sputum induction and exercise challenge were performed in 21 asthmatic patients. Significantly higher percentages of eosinophils and levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were found in induced sputum in EIB-positive asthmatics (median (range), eosinophils: 23.5 (11.0-61.0)%; ECP: 1,475 (74.8-17,701) ng x mL(-1)) than in EIB-negative asthmatics (eosinophils: 6.0 (1.0-41.5)% (p=0.006); ECP: 270.6 (10.8-7,700) ng x mL(-1) (p=0.049)). There was a significant correlation between the severity of EIB and the sputum eosinophil percentage (r=0.59, p=0.009) and the level of ECP (r=0.47, p=0.037). The area under the curve of the forced expiratory volume in one second for 30 min after exercise correlated with the percentage of eosinophils (r=0.60, p=0.008) and the level of ECP (r=0.45, p=0.04). There was no correlation between airway responsiveness to methacholine on the one hand and EIB, sputum eosinophils or ECP on the other. In conclusion, these results provide evidence that the severity of bronchoconstriction evoked by exercise is more closely related to eosinophilic airway inflammation than airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic patients.     

Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on the management of asthma advocate the use of anti-inflammatory treatment in all but mild disease. They define disease control in terms of clinical criteria such as lung function and symptoms. However, the relationship between the clinical control of the disease and inflammation of the airways is not clear. A cross sectional study was therefore undertaken to investigate the relationship between airways inflammation and measures of clinical control and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled steroids. METHODS: Twenty six atopic adults (19-45 years) with mild to moderate asthma (baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > or = 50% predicted, concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) 0.02-7.6 mg/ml) on regular treatment with inhaled steroids entered the study. Diary card recordings during the two weeks before a methacholine challenge test and bronchoscopic examination were used to determine peak flow variability, symptom scores, and use of beta 2 agonists. Biopsy specimens were taken by fibreoptic bronchoscopy from the carina of the right lower and middle lobes, and from the main carina. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on cryostat sections with monoclonal antibodies against: eosinophil cationic protein (EG1, EG2), mast cell tryptase (AA1), CD45, CD22, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, and CD45RO. The number of positively stained cells in the lamina propria was counted twice by using an interactive display system. RESULTS: There were no differences in cell numbers between the three sites from which biopsy specimens were taken. The PC20 for methacholine was inversely related to the average number of total leucocytes, EG1+, and EG2+ cells, mast cells, CD8+, and CD45RO+ cells in the lamina propria. These relationships were similar for each of the biopsy sites. Symptom scores, beta 2 agonist usage, FEV1, and peak flow variability were not related to any of the cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria of the airways seems to persist in asthmatic outpatients despite regular treatment with inhaled steroids. The number of infiltrating leucocytes such as mast cells, (activated) eosinophils, CD8+, and CD45RO+ cells in bronchial biopsy specimens from these patients appears to be reflected by airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, but not by symptoms or lung function. These findings may have implications for the adjustment of anti-inflammatory treatment of patients with asthma.     

Effect of inhaled PGE2 on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects

Previous studies have suggested that the endogenous release of inhibitory prostanoids limits the bronchoconstrictor response to repeated exercise. The aim of our study was to determine whether inhaled prostaglandin (PG)E2 attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or methacholine airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Eight subjects with mild stable asthma and exercise bronchoconstriction were studied on 4 separate days, 48 h apart. Subjects inhaled PGE2 or placebo in a randomized, crossover, double-blind fashion, 30 min prior to an exercise challenge or a methacholine challenge. PGE2 inhalation significantly attenuated exercise bronchoconstriction. The mean maximal %fall in FEV1 after exercise was 26% (SEM 3.7%) after placebo, and was 9.7% (SEM 2.7%) after PGE2 (p < 0.001). PGE2 also significantly reduced the duration of exercise bronchoconstriction (p = 0.034). However, PGE2 did not significantly attenuate methacholine airway responsiveness. The geometric mean methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was 0.77 (%SEM 1.48) after placebo day, and 1.41 (%SEM 2.20) after PGE2 (p = 0.30). These results demonstrate that inhaled PGE2 markedly attenuates exercise bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects and suggest that this effect is not occurring through functional antagonism of airway smooth muscle.     

Beclomethasone given after the early asthmatic response inhibits the late response and the increased methacholine responsiveness and cromolyn does not

BACKGROUND: Single doses of inhaled beclomethasone or inhaled cromolyn, given before allergen inhalation, inhibit allergen-induced late asthmatic responses (LARs) and increased airway responsiveness (delta log methacholine PC20). We hypothesized that when given 2 hours after allergen, beclomethasone might work better than cromolyn. METHODS: In 10 patients with mild, stable, atopic asthma with LARs or delta log PC20 or both, we performed a double-blind, double-dummy, random-order trial comparing a single dose of inhaled beclomethasone (500 micrograms), cromolyn (20 mg), and placebo, administered 2 hours after allergen challenge on LAR and delta log PC20. RESULTS: The treatment effect on LAR was significant (p < 0.001). The LAR after beclomethasone (7.3% +/- 6.1%) was significantly less than after cromolyn (20.4% +/- 15.2%) or placebo (26.4% +/- 8.2%); cromolyn was not different from placebo. There was a borderline treatment effect on delta log PC20 (p = 0.056) with beclomethasone (0.12 +/- 0.31) less than placebo (0.37 +/- 0.39) but not less than cromolyn (0.34 +/- 0.18). CONCLUSION: Beclomethasone (500 micrograms) administered 2 hours after allergen challenge markedly inhibited the LAR and had a small effect on allergen-induced airway responsiveness. Cromolyn (20 mg) was not effective on maximal LAR; a small effect on the early part of the LAR was suggested.     

Exhaled nitric oxide is higher both at day and night in subjects with nocturnal asthma

Nitric oxide in exhaled air is thought to reflect airway inflammation. No data have been reported so far on circadian changes in NO in subjects with nocturnal asthma. To determine whether exhaled NO shows a circadian rhythm inverse to the circadian rhythm in airway obstruction in subjects with nocturnal asthma, we conducted a study involving six healthy controls, eight individuals without nocturnal asthma (4-h to 16-h variation in peak expiratory flow [PEF] <= 15%), and six individuals with nocturnal asthma (4-h to 16-h PEF variation > 15%). Smoking, use of corticosteroids, and recent respiratory infections were excluded. NO concentrations were measured at 12, 16, 20, and 24 h, and at 4, 8, and 12 h of the next day, using the single-breath method. At the same times, FEV1 and PEF were also measured. Mean NO concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with nocturnal asthma than in subjects without nocturnal asthma, and higher in both groups than in healthy controls at all time points. Mean exhaled NO levels over 24 h correlated with the 4-h to 16-h variation in PEF (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Exhaled NO did not show a significant circadian variation in any of the three groups as assessed with cosinor analysis, in contrast to the FEV1 in both asthma groups (p < 0.05). At 4 h, mean +/- SD NO levels were higher than at 16 h in subjects with nocturnal asthma; at 50 +/- 20 ppb versus 42 +/- 15 ppb (p < 0.05); other measurements at all time points were similar. Differences in NO and FEV1 from 4 h to 16 h did not correlate with one another. We conclude that subjects with nocturnal asthma exhale NO at higher levels both at night and during the day, which may reflect more severe diurnal airway-wall inflammation. A circadian rhythm in exhaled NO was not observed. NO levels did not correspond to the circadian rhythm in airway obstruction. The small increase in NO at 4 h may indicate an aspect of inflammation, but it is not associated with increased nocturnal airway obstruction.     

Potentiating effect of inhaled acetaldehyde on bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that acetaldehyde induces bronchoconstriction indirectly via histamine release. However, no study has been performed to assess whether acetaldehyde worsens bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic subjects so this hypothesis was tested. METHODS: Methacholine provocation was performed on three occasions: (1) after pretreatment with oral placebo and inhaled saline (P-S day), (2) after placebo and inhaled acetaldehyde (P-A day), and (3) after a potent histamine H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine and acetaldehyde (T-A day) in a double blind, randomised, crossover fashion. Nine asthmatic subjects inhaled 0.8 mg/ml acetaldehyde or saline for four minutes. After each inhalation a methacholine provocation test was performed. RESULTS: Methacholine concentrations producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20-MCh) on the P-A day (0.48 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.08) and T-A day (0.41 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.77) were lower than those on the P-S day (0.85 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.54). There was no change in the PC20-MCh between the P-A and T-A days. A correlation was observed between the logarithmic values of PC20-MCh (log PC20-MCh) on the P-S day and the potentiating effect of acetaldehyde on the methacholine responsiveness [(log PC20-MCh on P-A day)-(log PC20-MCh on P-S day)] (rho = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Acetaldehyde induces bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma by mechanisms other than histamine release.     

Elevated levels of expired breath hydrogen peroxide in bronchiectasis

Airway inflammation is important in the development and progression of many lung diseases, including bronchiectasis. Activation of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils, eosinophils, and macrophages induces a respiratory burst resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). We have measured exhaled H2O2 in patients with documented bronchiectasis and investigated whether the concentration of H2O2 is related to the disease severity, as defined by lung function. We also investigated whether the concentrations of expired H2O2 were different in bronchiectatic patients who received inhaled corticosteroids compared with steroid-na?ve patients. In 37 patients with bronchiectasis (mean age, 45 +/- 2.5 yr; FEV1, 59 +/- 3% pred), mean H2O2 concentration in exhaled breath condensate was significantly elevated as compared with the values in 25 age-matched (mean age, 42 +/- 2 yr) normal subjects (0.87 +/- 0.01 versus 0.26 +/- 0.04 microM, p < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between H2O2 and FEV1 (r = -0.76, p < 0.0001). Patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids had values of H2O2 similar to those of steroid-na?ve patients (0.8 +/- 0.1 versus 0.9 +/- 0.1, p > 0.05). We conclude that H2O2 is elevated in exhaled air condensate of patients with bronchiectasis and is correlated with disease severity. Measurement of H2O2 may be used as a simple noninvasive method to monitor airway inflammation and oxidative stress.     

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is reduced shortly after bronchoconstriction to direct and indirect stimuli in asthma

Exhaled NO is increased in patients with asthma and may reflect disease severity. We examined whether the level of exhaled NO is related to the degree of airway obstruction induced by direct and indirect stimuli in asthma. Therefore, we measured exhaled NO levels before and during recovery from histamine and hypertonic saline (HS) challenge (Protocol 1) or histamine, adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), and isotonic saline (IS) challenge (Protocol 2) in 11 and in nine patients with mild to moderate asthma, respectively. The challenges were randomized with a 2-d interval. Exhaled NO and FEV1 were measured before and at 4, 10, 20, and 30 min after each challenge. NO was measured during a slow VC maneuver with a constant expiratory flow of (0.05 x FVC)/s against a resistance of 1 to 2 cm H2O. Baseline exhaled NO levels were not significantly different between study days in Protocol 1 (mean +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 1.8 ppb [histamine] versus 5.4 +/- 2.1 ppb [HS], p = 0.4) or in Protocol 2 (7.9 +/- 4.7 ppb [histamine], 8.3 +/- 5.2 ppb [AMP], and 7.2 +/- 3.7 ppb [IS], p = 0.7). A significant reduction in exhaled NO was observed directly after HS (mean +/- SEM: 39.2 +/- 3.9 %fall) and AMP challenge (32.3 +/- 7.3 %fall) (MANOVA, p < 0.001), respectively, whereas exhaled NO levels tended to decrease after histamine challenge. Isotonic saline challenge did not induce changes in exhaled NO (p = 0.7). There was a positive correlation between %fall in FEV1 and the %fall in exhaled NO after histamine, HS, and AMP challenge as indicated by the mean slope of the within-subject regression lines (p <= 0.04). We conclude that acute bronchoconstriction, as induced by direct and indirect stimuli, is associated with a reduction in exhaled NO levels in asthmatic subjects. This suggests that airway caliber should be taken into account when monitoring exhaled NO in asthma.     

Relaxin activates the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells in culture

The effects of usual or low doses of inhaled corticosteroids on airway mucosal inflammation have not yet been examined. We therefore, compared the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg x day(-1) on asthma control outcomes and markers of airway inflammation. Twenty-four adult subjects with mild and moderate asthma were randomized to receive either BDP or placebo for four weeks; then subjects entered a single blind four week placebo run-in period. We found that the BDP group had significantly greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), morning peak flow, and rescue salbutamol use than the placebo-treated group. The improvement in FEV1 largely reversed one week after treatment was stopped. The decrease in the median percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum in the BDP group from 3.8% to 3.4% was not significant, but because eosinophils increased from 8.4% to 12.7% in the placebo group, there was a significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups during treatment in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase mucin-like glycoprotein, or fibrinogen in induced sputum. The change in FEV1 in the BDP group did not correlate significantly with the change in eosinophil percentage or ECP levels. We concluded that four weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 336 microg x day(-1) was associated with significant improvements in peak flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, and rescue salbutamol use in asthmatic subjects but was not associated with large reductions in markers of eosinophilic inflammation, bronchovascular permeability, or mucus hypersecretion.     

Nedocromil sodium in obstructive airways disease: effect on symptoms and plasma protein leakage in sputum

In patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, there is chronic airway inflammation with increased leakage of plasma proteins into the airway lumen, which can be reduced by inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Nedocromil sodium is an anti-inflammatory drug, and we questioned whether it also affects the leakage of plasma proteins. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study we investigated the effect of 12 weeks of treatment with nedocromil on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), peak flow, symptom scores, and plasma protein leakage in sputum, in 31 patients with obstructive airways disease and sputum production (mean (range) FEV1 61% of predicted (42-87%); geometric mean (range) PC20 0.39 (0.04-2.9) mg x mL(-1)). As a measure for plasma protein leakage we calculated the relative coefficients of excretion (RCE) of proteins from serum to the soluble phase of sputum. There was a small increase in morning and evening peak flow (p<0.05) and a decrease in night-time bronchodilator use (p<0.02) in favour of nedocromil. The RCE of alpha2-macroglobulin to albumin significantly decreased after treatment with nedocromil (p=0.03). The results show limited clinical efficacy of nedocromil in our study group. They further suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of nedocromil extend to inhibition of plasma protein leakage into the airways.     

A review of the effectiveness of Cimicifuga racemosa (black cohosh) for the symptoms of menopause

1. Environmental contact with cold air is a common cause of respiratory distress in obstructive lung disease, and direct and reflex changes in bronchial calibre are well documented with this stimulus when it is inhaled or contacts the exposed skin respectively. It is now known that skin chilling does not amplify the effects of breathing cold air, but it is not established if this lack of interaction is unique, or applies to other forms of airway constrictors. 2. To provide data on this issue, 10 subjects with atopic asthma underwent methacholine bronchoprovocations with and without chilling of the integument of their heads and thoraces for 30 min. Chilling was accomplished with a specially designed thermal garment. Spirometry as well as core and skin temperatures were serially monitored during all experiments. 3. In the control phase (no cooling), integumental temperatures rose slightly, the forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s (FEV1.0) did not change, and the mean provocative concentration of methacholine required to reduce the FEV1.0 by 20% (PC20 meth) was 0.47 +/- 0.17 mg/ml (2.4 +/- 0.87 mmol/l). In the cold trial, the temperature of the back fell 5.1 +/- 1.7 degrees C to 28.7 +/- 1.8 degrees C (P < 0.01), core temperatures did not change, and airway obstruction developed (delta FEV1.0 = -6.7 +/- 2.1%; P < 0.05). The PC20 meth, however, was unaltered [PC20 meth = 0.45 +/- 0.13 mg/ml (2.3 +/- 0.66 mmol/l); P = 0.85]. 4. These results demonstrate that although skin cooling produces mild airway obstruction in subjects with asthma, it does not change the response to non-specific bronchoconstrictors such as methacholine.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness after cervical spinal cord injury

Cervical spinal cord injury results in interruption of sympathetic airway innervation, which originates from the upper thoracic spine, whereas parasympathetic nerve supply, arising in the vagal nuclei of the brainstem, remains intact. To assess the effect of such an altered neural environment on airway reactivity, bronchoprovocation testing was performed on eight subjects with nonacute traumatic lesions of the cervical spine, all of whom were lifetime nonsmokers without history of respiratory symptoms prior to their injury. Bronchial challenge was subsequently repeated after pretreatment with the anticholinergic agent, ipratropium bromide, an inhibitor of airway muscarinic receptors. All subjects demonstrated hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (the concentration of methacholine producing a fall in FEV1 of 20 percent from baseline [PC20] = 1.42 +/- 1.61 [SD] mg/ml). Airway hyperreactivity was completely blocked by pretreatment with inhaled ipratropium bromide (mean PC20 > 25 mg/ml [p < 0.0001]). The bronchial hyperresponsiveness observed in this population most likely reflects the loss of sympathetic airway innervation and resultant unopposed cholinergic bronchoconstrictor tone which results from transection of the cervical spine. Blockade of methacholine hyperresponsiveness with ipratropium bromide suggests a muscarinic receptor-mediated phenomenon.     

Increased LTB4 metabolites and PGD2 in BAL fluid after methacholine challenge in asthmatic subjects

The bronchoconstrictor potency of inhaled methacholine is widely used to assess airway responsiveness. However, evidence has accumulated that methacholine inhalation challenge may lead to an inflammatory response in the lower respiratory tract. We therefore compared cellular, leukotriene and prostanoid profiles in bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) obtained five hours after methacholine challenge to control lavages without prior challenge. Eight subjects with asymptomatic to mild bronchial asthma and nine nonatopic healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Without prior challenge, the percentage of BAL eosinophils was higher in the asthmatic subjects ((mean +/- SD), 1.1 +/- 0.9%) than in the control subjects (0.1 +/- 0.1%. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4), and its omega-oxidation products (20-OH-LTB4 and 20-COOH-LTB4) were the only leukotrienes detectable in the baseline BAL fluids in five of the eight asthmatic patients. After methacholine challenge, no change in BAL cell profile occurred, but in the asthmatic patients, the total amounts of LTB4 and its omega-oxidation products rose from 0.52 +/- 0.50 ng.ml-1 (pre-challenge) to 1.55 +/- 1.32 ng.ml-1 (post-challenge), and prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) rose from 49.1 +/- 15.7 (pre-challenge) to 94.4 +/- 25.4 pg.ml-1 (post-challenge), with no change in 6-keto-PGF1 alpha, thromboxane B2 (TXB2), and prostaglandins F2 alpha and E2 (PGF2 alpha and PGE2). In the healthy controls, no consistent change in BAL cell profile and mediators occurred after methacholine provocation. We conclude that inhaled methacholine stimulates LTB4 and PGD2 release in asthmatics, but not in healthy controls, without affecting the number of inflammatory cells in BAL fluid.