Isoxazole‐Based‐Scaffold Inhibitors Targeting Cyclooxygenases (COXs)

A new set of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors endowed with an additional functionality was explored. These new compounds also contained either rhodamine 6G or 6,7‐dimethoxy‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline, two moieties typical of efflux pump substrates and inhibitors, respectively. Among all the synthesized compounds, two new COX inhibitors with opposite selectivity were discovered: compound 8 [N‐(9‐{2‐[(4‐{2‐[3‐(5‐chlorofuran‐2‐yl)‐4‐phenylisoxazol‐5‐yl]acetamido}butyl)carbamoyl]phenyl‐6‐(ethylamino)‐2,7‐dimethyl‐3H‐xanthen‐3‐ylidene}ethanaminium chloride] was found to be a selective COX‐1 inhibitor, whereas 17 (2‐[3,4‐bis(4‐methoxyphenyl)isoxazol‐5‐yl]‐1‐[6,7‐dimethoxy‐3,4‐dihydroisoquinolin‐2‐(1H)‐yl]ethanone) was found to be a sub‐micromolar selective COX‐2 inhibitor. However, both were shown to interact with P‐glycoprotein. Docking experiments helped to clarify the molecular aspects of the observed COX selectivity.     

Discovery of 7‐Aryl‐Substituted (1,5‐Naphthyridin‐4‐yl)ureas as Aurora Kinase Inhibitors

As part of our research projects to identify new chemical entities of biological interest, we developed a synthetic approach and the biological evaluation of (7‐aryl‐1,5‐naphthyridin‐4‐yl)ureas as a novel class of Aurora kinase inhibitors for the treatment of malignant diseases based on pathological cell proliferation. 1,5‐Naphthyridine derivatives showed excellent inhibitory activities toward Aurora kinases A and B, and the most active compound, 1‐cyclopropyl‐3‐[7‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)‐1,5‐naphthyridin‐4‐yl]urea ( 49 ), displayed IC₅₀ values of 13 and 107 nM against Aurora kinases A and B, respectively. In addition, the selectivity toward a panel of seven cancer‐related protein kinases was highlighted. In vitro ADME properties were also determined in order to rationalize the difficulties in correlating antiproliferative activity with Aurora kinase inhibition. Finally, the good safety profile of these compounds imparts promising potential for their further development as anticancer agents.     

Evaluating p97 Inhibitor Analogues for Their Domain Selectivity and Potency against the p97–p47 Complex

We previously found that p97 ATPase inhibitors 2‐(2‐amino‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N‐benzyl‐8‐methoxyquinazolin‐4‐amine ( ML240 ) and 2‐(2H‐benzo[b][1,4]oxazin‐4(3H)‐yl)‐N‐benzyl‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydroquinazolin‐4‐amine ( ML241 ) specifically target the D2 domain of wild‐type p97. In addition, one of the major p97 cofactors, p47, decreases their potencies by ～50‐fold. In contrast, N²,N⁴‐dibenzylquinazoline‐2,4‐diamine ( DBeQ ) targets both the D1 and D2 domains and shows only a four‐ to sixfold decrease in potency against the p97–p47 complex. To elucidate structure–activity relationships for the inhibitors, we screened 200 p97 inhibitor analogues for their ability to inhibit the ATPase activity of either or both of the D1 or D2 domains, as well for their effects on p47 potency. The selectivity of 29 of these compounds was further examined by eight‐dose titrations. Four compounds showed modest selectivity for inhibiting the ATPase activity of D1. Eleven compounds inhibited D2 with greater potencies, and four showed similar potencies against D1 and D2. p47 decreased the potencies of the majority of the compounds and increased the potencies of five compounds. These results highlight the possibility of developing domain‐selective and complex‐specific p97 inhibitors in order to further elucidate the physiological roles of p97 and its cofactors.     

Fluorophore‐Labeled Cyclooxygenase‐2 Inhibitors for the Imaging of Cyclooxygenase‐2 Overexpression in Cancer: Synthesis and Biological Studies

A group of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2)‐specific fluorescent cancer biomarkers were synthesized by linking the anti‐inflammatory drugs ibuprofen, (S)‐naproxen, and celecoxib to the 7‐nitrobenzofurazan (NBD) fluorophore. In vitro COX‐1/COX‐2 inhibition studies indicated that all of these fluorescent conjugates are COX‐2 inhibitors (IC₅₀ range: 0.19–23.0 μM ) with an appreciable COX‐2 selectivity index (SI≥4.3–444). In this study the celecoxib–NBD conjugate N‐(2‐((7‐nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol‐4‐yl)amino)ethyl)‐4‐(5‐(p‐tolyl)‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)benzenesulfonamide ( 14 ), which displayed the highest COX‐2 inhibitory potency and selectivity (COX‐2 IC₅₀=0.19 μM ; SI=443.6), was identified as an impending COX‐2‐specific biomarker for the fluorescence imaging of cancer using a COX‐2‐expressing human colon cancer cell line (HCA‐7).     

PET Imaging of T Cells: Target Identification and Feasibility Assessment

Imaging T cells using positron emission tomography (PET) would be highly useful for diagnosis and monitoring in immunology and oncology patients. There are, however, no obvious targets that can be used to develop imaging agents for this purpose. We evaluated several potential target proteins with selective expression in T cells, and for which lead molecules were available: protein kinase C isozyme θ (PKC θ), lymphocyte‐specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck), zeta‐chain‐associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70), and interleukin‐2‐inducible T‐cell kinase (Itk). Ultimately, we focused on Itk and identified a tool molecule with properties suitable for in vivo imaging of T cells: (5aR)‐5,5‐difluoro‐5a‐methyl‐N‐(1‐((S)‐3‐(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)(tetrahydro‐2H‐pyran‐4‐yl)methyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)‐1,4,4a,5,5a,6‐hexahydrocyclopropa[f]indazole‐3‐carboxamide ( 23 ). Although it does not have the optimal profile for clinical use, this molecule indicates that it might be possible to develop Itk‐selective PET ligands for imaging the distribution of T cells in patients.     

Structure‐Guided Discovery of Antitubercular Agents That Target the Gyrase ATPase Domain

In this study we explored the pharmaceutically underexploited ATPase domain of DNA gyrase (GyrB) as a potential platform for developing novel agents that target Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this effort a combination of ligand‐ and structure‐based pharmacophore modeling was used to identify structurally diverse small‐molecule inhibitors of the mycobacterial GyrB domain based on the crystal structure of the enzyme with a pyrrolamide inhibitor (PDB ID: 4BAE ). Pharmacophore modeling and subsequent in vitro screening resulted in an initial hit compound 5 [(E)‐5‐(5‐(2‐(1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐2‐yl)‐2‐cyanovinyl)furan‐2‐yl)isophthalic acid; IC₅₀=4.6±0.1 μm ], which was subsequently tailored through a combination of molecular modeling and synthetic chemistry to yield the optimized lead compound 24 [(E)‐3‐(5‐(2‐cyano‐2‐(5‐methyl‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐2‐yl)vinyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)benzoic acid; IC₅₀=0.3±0.2 μm ], which was found to display considerable in vitro efficacy against the purified GyrB enzyme and potency against the H₃₇Rv strain of M. tuberculosis. Structural handles were also identified that will provide a suitable foundation for further optimization of these potent analogues.     

Structural Determinants of the Selectivity of 3‐Benzyluracil‐1‐acetic Acids toward Human Enzymes Aldose Reductase and AKR1B10

The human enzymes aldose reductase (AR) and AKR1B10 have been thoroughly explored in terms of their roles in diabetes, inflammatory disorders, and cancer. In this study we identified two new lead compounds, 2‐(3‐(4‐chloro‐3‐nitrobenzyl)‐2,4‐dioxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrimidin‐1(2H)‐yl)acetic acid (JF0048, 3 ) and 2‐(2,4‐dioxo‐3‐(2,3,4,5‐tetrabromo‐6‐methoxybenzyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimidin‐1(2H)‐yl)acetic acid (JF0049, 4 ), which selectively target these enzymes. Although 3 and 4 share the 3‐benzyluracil‐1‐acetic acid scaffold, they have different substituents in their aryl moieties. Inhibition studies along with thermodynamic and structural characterizations of both enzymes revealed that the chloronitrobenzyl moiety of compound 3 can open the AR specificity pocket but not that of the AKR1B10 cognate. In contrast, the larger atoms at the ortho and/or meta positions of compound 4 prevent the AR specificity pocket from opening due to steric hindrance and provide a tighter fit to the AKR1B10 inhibitor binding pocket, probably enhanced by the displacement of a disordered water molecule trapped in a hydrophobic subpocket, creating an enthalpic signature. Furthermore, this selectivity also occurs in the cell, which enables the development of a more efficient drug design strategy: compound 3 prevents sorbitol accumulation in human retinal ARPE‐19 cells, whereas 4 stops proliferation in human lung cancer NCI‐H460 cells.     

The Discovery of Potent Nonstructural Protein 5A (NS5A) Inhibitors with a Unique Resistance Profile—Part 1

Nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) represents a novel target for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Daclatasvir, recently reported by Bristol–Myers–Squibb, is a potent NS5A inhibitor currently under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials. While the performance of daclatasvir has been impressive, the emergence of resistance could prove problematic and as such, improved analogues are being sought. By varying the biphenyl‐imidazole unit of daclatasvir, novel inhibitors of HCV NS5A were identified with an improved resistance profile against mutant strains of the virus while retaining the picomolar potency of daclatasvir. One compound in particular, methyl ((S)‐1‐((S)‐2‐(4‐(4‐(6‐(2‐((S)‐1‐((methoxycarbonyl)‐L ‐valyl)pyrrolidin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazol‐5‐yl)quinoxalin‐2‐yl)phenyl)‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐3‐methyl‐1‐oxobutan‐2‐yl)carbamate ( 17 ), exhibited very promising activity and showed good absorption and a long predicted human pharmacokinetic half‐life. This compound represents a promising lead that warrants further evaluation.     

Design,Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Antagonists: Molecular Basis of FXR Antagonism

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) plays an important role in the regulation of cholesterol, lipid, and glucose metabolism. Recently, several studies on the molecular basis of FXR antagonism have been reported. However, none of these studies employs an FXR antagonist with nonsteroidal scaffold. On the basis of our previously reported FXR antagonist with a trisubstituted isoxazole scaffold, a novel nonsteroidal FXR ligand was designed and used as a lead for structural modification. In total, 39 new trisubstituted isoxazole derivatives were designed and synthesized, which led to pharmacological profiles ranging from agonist to antagonist toward FXR. Notably, compound 5s (4′‐[(3‐{[3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)‐5‐(2‐thienyl)isoxazol‐4‐yl]methoxy}‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]biphenyl‐2‐carboxylic acid), containing a thienyl‐substituted isoxazole ring, displayed the best antagonistic activity against FXR with good cellular potency (IC₅₀=12.2±0.2 μM ). Eventually, this compound was used as a probe in a molecular dynamics simulation assay. Our results allowed us to propose an essential molecular basis for FXR antagonism, which is consistent with a previously reported antagonistic mechanism; furthermore, E467 on H12 was found to be a hot‐spot residue and may be important for the future design of nonsteroidal antagonists of FXR.     

1‐(1H‐Indol‐3‐yl)ethanamine Derivatives as Potent Staphylococcus aureus NorA Efflux Pump Inhibitors

The synthesis of 37 1‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethanamine derivatives, including 12 new compounds, was achieved through a series of simple and efficient chemical modifications. These indole derivatives displayed modest or no intrinsic anti‐staphylococcal activity. By contrast, several of the compounds restored, in a concentration‐dependent manner, the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus strains that were resistant to fluoroquinolones due to overexpression of the NorA efflux pump. Structure–activity relationships studies revealed that the indolic aldonitrones halogenated at position 5 of the indole core were the most efficient inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump. Among the compounds, (Z)‐N‐benzylidene‐2‐(tert‐butoxycarbonylamino)‐1‐(5‐iodo‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethanamine oxide led to a fourfold decrease of the ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration against the SA‐1199B strain when used at a concentration of 0.5 mg L ^?1. To the best of our knowledge, this activity is the highest reported to date for an indolic NorA inhibitor. In addition, a new antibacterial compound, tert‐butyl (2‐(3‐hydroxyureido)‐2‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethyl)carbamate, which is not toxic for human cells, was also found.     

Evaluating p97 Inhibitor Analogues for Potency against p97–p37 and p97–Npl4–Ufd1 Complexes

We previously found that the p97 cofactor, p47, significantly decreased the potency of some ATP‐competitive p97 inhibitors such as ML240 [2‐(2‐amino‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N‐benzyl‐8‐methoxyquinazolin‐4‐amine] and ML241 [2‐(2H‐benzo[b][1,4]oxazin‐4(3H)‐yl)‐N‐benzyl‐5,6,7,8 tetrahydroquinazolin‐4‐amine]. In this study, we aimed to evaluate inhibitor potencies against two additional p97 cofactor complexes, p97–p37 and p97–Npl4–Ufd1. We focused on these two cofactor complexes, because the protein sequence of p37 is 50 % identical to that of p47, and the Npl4–Ufd1 heterodimer (NU) is the most‐studied p97 cofactor complex. We screened 200 p97 inhibitor analogues for their ability to inhibit the ATPase activity of p97 alone and of p97–p37 and p97–NU complexes. In contrast to the effect of p47, p37 and NU did not significantly change the potencies of most of the compounds. These results highlight differences among p97 cofactors in influencing p97 conformation and effects of inhibitors on p97 complexes, as compared to p97 alone. Continued efforts are needed to advance the development of complex‐specific p97 inhibitors.     

Development of Photoactivatable Allosteric Modulators for the Chemokine Receptor CXCR3

The CXCR3 receptor, a class A G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR), is involved in the regulation and trafficking of various immune cells. CXCR3 antagonists have been proposed to be beneficial for the treatment of a wide range of disorders including but not limited to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The structure‐based design of CXCR3 ligands remains, however, hampered by a lack of structural information describing in detail the interactions between an allosteric ligand and the receptor. We designed and synthesized photoactivatable probes for the structural and functional characterization, using photoaffinity labeling followed by mass spectrometry, of the CXCR3 allosteric binding pocket of AMG 487 and RAMX3, two potent and selective CXCR3 negative allosteric modulators. Photoaffinity labeling is a common approach to elucidate binding modes of small‐molecule ligands of GPCRs through the aid of photoactivatable probes that convert to extremely reactive intermediates upon photolysis. The photolabile probe N‐[({1‐[3‐(4‐ethoxyphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐yl]ethyl}‐2‐[4‐fluoro‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]‐N‐{1‐[4‐(3‐(trifluoromethyl)‐3H‐diazirin‐3‐yl]benzyl}piperidin‐4‐yl)methyl]acetamide ( 10 ) showed significant labeling of the CXCR3 receptor (80 %) in a [³H]RAMX3 radioligand displacement assay. Compound 10 will serve as an important tool compound for the detailed investigation of the binding pocket of CXCR3 by mass spectrometry.     

Ligand‐Biased and Probe‐Dependent Modulation of Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 Signaling by Negative Allosteric Modulators

Over the last decade, functional selectivity (or ligand bias) has evolved from being a peculiar phenomenon to being recognized as an essential feature of synthetic ligands that target G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). The CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) is an outstanding platform to study various aspects of biased signaling, because nature itself uses functional selectivity to manipulate receptor signaling. At the same time, CXCR3 is an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and cancer. Herein we report the discovery of an 8‐azaquinazolinone derivative (N‐{1‐[3‐(4‐ethoxyphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐yl]ethyl}‐4‐(4‐fluorobutoxy)‐N‐[(1‐methylpiperidin‐4‐yl)methyl]butanamide, 1 b ) that can inhibit CXC chemokine 11 (CXCL11)‐dependent G protein activation over β‐arrestin recruitment with 187‐fold selectivity. This compound also demonstrates probe‐dependent activity, that is, it inhibits CXCL11‐ over CXCL10‐mediated G protein activation with 12‐fold selectivity. Together with a previously reported biased negative allosteric modulator from our group, the present study provides additional information on the molecular requirements for allosteric modulation of CXCR3.     

Optimization of Diarylthiazole B‐Raf Inhibitors: Identification of a Compound Endowed with High Oral Antitumor Activity,Mitigated hERG Inhibition,and Low Paradoxical Effect

Aberrant activation of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK)‐mediated pathway components, RAF‐MEK‐ERK, is frequently observed in human cancers and clearly contributes to oncogenesis. As part of a project aimed at finding inhibitors of B‐Raf, a key player in the MAPK cascade, we originally identified a thiazole derivative endowed with high potency and selectivity, optimal in vitro ADME properties, and good pharmacokinetic profiles in rodents, but that suffers from elevated hERG inhibitory activity. An optimization program was thus undertaken, focused mainly on the elaboration of the R¹ and R² groups of the scaffold. This effort ultimately led to N‐(4‐{2‐(1‐cyclopropylpiperidin‐4‐yl)‐4‐[3‐(2,5‐difluorobenzenesulfonylamino)‐2‐fluorophenyl]thiazol‐5‐yl}‐pyridin‐2‐yl)acetamide ( 20 ), which maintains favorable in vitro and in vivo properties, but lacks hERG liability. Besides exhibiting potent antiproliferative activity against only cell lines bearing B‐Raf V600E or V600D mutations, compound 20 also intriguingly shows a weaker “paradoxical” activation of MEK in non‐mutant B‐Raf cells than other known B‐Raf inhibitors. It also demonstrates very good efficacy in vivo against the A375 xenograft melanoma model (tumor volume inhibition >90 % at 10 mg kg^?1); it is therefore a suitable candidate for preclinical development.     

From Type I to Type II: Design,Synthesis, and Characterization of Potent Pyrazin‐2‐ones as DFG‐Out Inhibitors of PDGFRβ

Reversible protein kinase inhibitors that bind in the ATP cleft can be classified as type I or type II binders. Of these, type I inhibitors address the active form, whereas type II inhibitors typically lock the kinase in an inactive form. At the molecular level, the conformation of the flexible activation loop holding the key DFG motif controls access to the ATP site, thereby determining an active or inactive kinase state. Accordingly, type I and type II kinase inhibitors bind to so‐called DFG‐in or DFG‐out conformations, respectively. Based on our former study on highly selective platelet‐derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) pyrazin‐2‐one type I inhibitors, we expanded this scaffold toward the deep pocket, yielding the highly potent and effective type II inhibitor 5 (4‐[(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl]‐N‐[3‐[[6‐oxo‐5‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrazin‐3‐yl]methyl]phenyl]benzamide). In vitro characterization, including selectivity panel data from activity‐based assays (300 kinases) and affinity‐based assays (97 kinases) of these PDGFRβ type I ( 1 ; 5‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐phenyl)‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrazin‐2‐one) and II ( 5 ) inhibitors showing the same pyrazin‐2‐one chemotype are compared. Implications are discussed regarding the data for selectivity and efficacy of type I and type II ligands.     

Structure–Activity Relationships of 1,2‐Disubstituted Benzimidazoles: Selective Inhibition of Heme Oxygenase‐2 Activity

Devising ways to up‐ or down‐regulate heme oxygenase activity is attracting much interest as a strategy for the treatment of a variety of disorders. With a view of obtaining compounds that exhibit high potency and selectivity as inhibitors of the heme oxygenase‐2 (HO‐2) isozyme (constitutive) relative to the heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) isozyme (inducible), several 1,2‐disubstituted 1H‐benzimidazoles were designed and synthesized. Specifically, analogues were synthesized in which the C2 substituent was the following: (1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl, (N‐morpholinyl)methyl, cyclopentylmethyl, cyclohexylmethyl, or (norborn‐2‐yl)methyl. Compounds with the cyclic system in the C2 substituent being a carbocyclic ring, especially cyclohexyl or norborn‐2‐yl, and the N1 substituent being a ring‐substituted benzyl group, especially 4‐chlorobenzyl or 4‐bromobenzyl, best exhibited the target criteria of high potency and selectivity toward inhibition of HO‐2. The new candidates should be useful pharmacological tools and may have therapeutic applications.     

Mono‐, Di‐ and Tetra‐Cationic Surfactants as Carbon Steel Corrosion Inhibitors

Corrosion inhibition of three new synthesized cationic surfactants, N‐(2‐(((Z)‐4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)amino)ethyl)‐N‐(2‐((E)‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylene)amino)ethyl)dodecan‐1‐aminium bromide I(4N), N¹,N²‐didodecyl‐N¹‐((Z)‐4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)‐N²‐(2‐((E)‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylene)amino)ethyl)ethane‐1,2‐diaminium bromide II(4N) and 1‐dodecyl‐4‐((E)‐((2‐(dodecyl(2‐(dodecyl((Z)‐4‐(1‐dodecylpyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)ammonio)ethyl)ammonio)ethyl)imino)methyl)pyridin‐1‐ium bromide IV(4N) on carbon steel was investigated by weight loss, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and polarization measurements. Results show that the synthesized cationic surfactants inhibit corrosion of carbon steel in 1 M HCl. The inhibitive action occurs by virtue of adsorption on the metal surface following a Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. Polarization curves reveal that the investigated cationic surfactants can be classified as mixed inhibitor types. The variations in the corrosion inhibition efficiency between three cationic surfactants are correlated with their chemical structures, with more hydrophobic surfactants yielding higher inhibition efficiency.     

Design,Synthesis, and in vitro Biological Evaluation of 3,5‐Dimethylisoxazole Derivatives as BRD4 Inhibitors

BRD4 has been identified as a potential target for blocking proliferation in a variety of cancer cell lines. In this study, 3,5‐dimethylisoxazole derivatives were designed and synthesized with excellent stability in liver microsomes as potent BRD4 inhibitors, and were evaluated for their BRD4 inhibitory activities in vitro. Gratifyingly, compound 11 h [3‐((1‐(2,4‐difluorophenyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)methyl)‐6‐(3,5‐dimethylisoxazol‐4‐yl)‐4‐phenyl‐3,4‐dihydroquinazolin‐2(1H)‐one] exhibited robust potency for BRD4(1) and BRD4(2) inhibition with IC₅₀ values of 27.0 and 180 nm , respectively. Docking studies were performed to illustrate the strategy of modification and analyze the conformation in detail. Furthermore, compound 11 h was found to potently inhibit cell proliferation in the BRD4‐sensitive cell lines HL‐60 and MV4‐11, with IC₅₀ values of 0.120 and 0.09 μm , respectively. Compound 11 h was further demonstrated to downregulate c‐Myc levels in HL‐60 cells. In summary, these results suggest that compound 11 h is most likely a potential BRD4 inhibitor and is a lead compound for further investigations.