Roxatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a randomized, double blind, controlled, multicenter study in Thailand

BACKGROUND: Roxatidine acetate is a novel H2-receptor antagonist and several studies have shown that it is effective in healing duodenal ulcers. We evaluated the efficacy of roxatidine in a non-western society with particular different features and its healing of duodenal ulcers was compared in Thailand with that of ranitidine. METHOD: The design was controlled, randomized, double-blind, and multicenter. The study recruited a total of 215 patients who were endoscoped at the start of the trial and then randomized to receive a single capsule of roxatidine acetate, 150 mg, or an identical capsule containing ranitidine, 300 mg, both to be taken at night. Patients were evaluated at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, including endoscopy at the last session, as well as at 6 weeks with repeat endoscopy if the ulcer had not healed. RESULT: Both drugs relieved pain rapidly, usually within a week, and at repeat endoscopy at 4 weeks most ulcers (78%) were healed, 77.0 and 79.5 per cent in ranitidine and roxatidine, and in those patients in whom healing was not completed the healing rate had risen appreciably to 89.8 and 93.8 per cent respectively at 6 weeks. Small ulcers tended to heal quicker than larger ones, but smoking and alcohol intake had no negative effects on the results. CONCLUSION: The study was valid proof that roxatidine, in a single evening dose of 150 mg, was found to be both safe and effective in the rapid healing of duodenal ulcers when compared with 300 mg ranitidine.     

Salmeterol compared with slow-release terbutaline in nocturnal asthma. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, sequential clinical trial. French Multicenter Study Group

The aim of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group clinical trial with a 2-week treatment period was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) with slow-release (SR) terbutaline (5 mg orally, twice daily) in nocturnal asthma. A total of 159 asthmatic adults (FEV, 50-90% of predicted value; sex ratio: 0.87) with at least two nocturnal awakenings during a 7-d run-in period was included in the study. Patients were centrally randomized with a national computer network (Minitel). The main variable (number of awakening-free nights during the last week of treatment) was analyzed according to a sequential method with the one-sided triangular test. The number of awakening-free nights (+/- SD) was significantly higher in the salmeterol group: 5.3 +/- 2.4 vs 4.6 +/- 2.3 (P = 0.006). Salmeterol was significantly more effective than SR-terbutaline in the following factors: number of patients without any awakening during the last week of treatment (50% vs 27%, P = 0.003), mean morning PEF (351 +/- 109 l/min-1 vs 332 +/- 105 l/min-1, P = 0.04), PEF diurnal variation 6 +/- 10% vs 11 +/- 12%, P = 0.01), overall assessment of efficacy by the patient and the investigator (P = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), and daily rescue salbutamol intakes (P = 0.004). In the salmeterol group, significantly fewer patients reported adverse events (16% vs 29%, P = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Roxatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blind controlled multicentre study in Singapore

Roxatidine acetate, a new H2 receptor antagonist, was compared with ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers in a double-blind multicentre study. Eighty-four patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 150 mg roxatidine acetate or 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime. Repeat endoscopy was performed after 4 weeks (25-33 days) and if the ulcer had not healed, another endoscopy was performed after a further 4 weeks of treatment. Using per protocol analysis 73.6% of ulcers treated with roxatidine healed at 4 weeks compared to 72.2% of ulcers treated with ranitidine (P = NS). The healing rates at 8 weeks were 92% with roxatidine and 83.3% with ranitidine (P = NS). Using equivalence tests, the healing rate of roxatidine was found to be equivalent to that of ranitidine within a 20% region. Roxatidine users took significantly less antacids than ranitidine users (P < 0.05). There were no significant adverse effects due to roxatidine or ranitidine. Roxatidine is a safe effective drug in the treatment of duodenal ulcers with a healing rate comparable to that of ranitidine.     

Long-term effects of finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. PROWESS Study Group

OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term effects of finasteride (5 mg/day) and placebo in patients with moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Patients aged 50 to 75 years, with at least two urinary symptoms indicating moderate BPH, and an enlarged prostate, were followed in a 2-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The effects of finasteride versus placebo were assessed by total symptom score (modified Boyarsky), obstructive symptom score, maximal urinary flow rate, prostate volume, and urologic end points (acute urinary retention, BPH-related surgical intervention). RESULTS: Of the 3270 men enrolled, 3168 contributed data to the safety analysis, and 2902 to the efficacy evaluation. Significantly greater improvement with finasteride compared to placebo was observed at 12 and 24 months for total symptom score (mean -2.9 versus -1.9 at 12 months, P < or =0.001; -3.2 versus -1.5 at 24 months, P < or =0.001), obstructive symptom score (mean -1.9 versus -1.3 at 12 months, P < or =0.001; -2.1 versus -1.1 at 24 months, P < or =0.001), maximal urinary flow rate (mean +1.2 versus +0.6 mL/s at 12 months, P = 0.010; +1.5 versus +0.7 mL/s at 24 months, P = 0.002), and prostate volume (mean -14.2 versus +5.4% at 12 months, P < or =0.01; -15.3 versus +8.9% at 24 months, P < or =0.001). Greater improvements in placebo-adjusted total symptom score occurred in men with large prostates than in men with small prostates (mean -2.4 versus -1.1 at 12 months; -3.2 versus -1.3 at 24 months, placebo-adjusted data, P = 0.053). Fifteen of 1450 men (1.0%) in the finasteride group experienced an acute urinary retention event, compared with 37 of 1452 (2.5%) in the placebo group, and the corresponding figures for surgery were 51 of 1450 (3.5%) and 86 of 1452 (5.9%), respectively. The hazard rate for occurrence, computed using the log-rank statistic, decreased by 57% for acute urinary retention and by 40% for surgery accompanied by finasteride therapy compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Finasteride causes long-term symptomatic improvement and reduces the risk of acute urinary retention or surgery. Men with enlarged prostates benefit most from finasteride treatment.     

Comparison of once-daily doses of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg) and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 520 patients, was to compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg once daily) with placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer. METHODS: Treatment with omeprazole or placebo lasted 4 wk; those whose ulcers remained unhealed continued the same treatment regimen for an additional 4 wk. The effects of therapy were determined by endoscopy and assessment of GI symptoms. Safety and tolerability were evaluated through reported adverse events, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: At weeks 4 and 8, the proportion of patients with healed ulcers was significantly greater in the omeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). At week 8, the healing rate was significantly greater in the 40-mg group than in the 20-mg group (82.7 vs 74.8%, p < 0.05). In patients with large ulcers (>1 cm), the 40-mg regimen was associated with a significantly higher healing rate (78.9%) than both the 20-mg regimen (61.4%) and placebo (34.6%) at week 8 (p < 0.05 vs omeprazole 20 mg; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Healing rates in patients with small ulcers were similar for the 40- and 20-mg groups. Omeprazole was well tolerated, with no significant differences versus placebo in the overall incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 40 and 20 mg, administered once daily, healed a significantly greater proportion of patients than did placebo. The 40-mg regimen offered significant advantages over the 20-mg regimen in patients with large ulcers.     

A randomized, double-blind study of the effect of olestra on disease activity in patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease. Olestra in IBD Study Group

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of olestra, a zero-calorie fat substitute that is neither digested nor absorbed, on the well-being and disease state of persons with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (n = 43) or Crohn's disease (n = 46) in remission, with a history of disease of 2 years or longer, were enrolled in this prospective study from nine private practices, three university-based medical centers, and one Veterans Administration medical center in the United States. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive olestra and 45 to receive triglycerides in chips or cookies daily for 4 weeks. At Week 4, patients were classified as in remission, worsened, or relapsed according to an investigator's global assessment based on sigmoidoscopy (for ulcerative colitis) or the Crohn's disease activity index, laboratory findings, and clinical course. RESULTS: At Week 4, the olestra and triglyceride groups did not differ significantly with respect to the percentages of patients who relapsed (P = 0.494; difference = 2.4%; upper 95% CL = 8.8%) or with respect to the percentages of patients who experienced any worsening of their symptoms (P = 0.630; difference = 0.2%; upper 95% CL = 13.3%). Of evaluable patients, 90% (37 of 41) given olestra remained in remission with no worsening, compared with 90% (38 of 42) given triglycerides. Gastrointestinal symptoms were comparable between the treatment groups, and there were no treatment-related laboratory abnormalities. Six patients were excluded from analysis for reasons unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSION: Olestra did not affect the activity of quiescent mild to moderate IBD.     

Sulfasalazine in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Dutch Juvenile Chronic Arthritis Study Group

AIMS: To determine whether left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions calculated from single plane two-dimensional echocardiograms using the algorithm (0.85A2L) correlate with those calculated using the biplane Simpson's method, and whether small changes in volumes and ejection fraction occurring post-infarction could be detected from single-plane as well as from biplane two-dimensional echocardiograms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial two-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained in 371 patients from the DEFIANT II trial a mean of 2 days, 1 week and 6 months post-infarction. Single plane volumes from the apical four chamber and apical long axis correlated closely with biplane Simpson's left ventricular volumes. Both single-plane left ventricular volumes significantly over-estimated biplane Simpson's volumes. Biplane Simpson's ejection fractions were consistently slightly under-estimated from the single-plane images. Differences between biplane Simpson's and single-plane volumes increased independently with increasing left ventricular size and distortion. The small changes in left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction over time were as reliably detected from single plane as from biplane images. CONCLUSION: Single-plane left ventricular volumes over-estimate biplane Simpson's volumes and under-estimate ejection fraction, and these discrepancies are amplified in dilated hearts with abnormal shape.     

Barnidipine, a novel calcium antagonist for once-daily treatment of hypertension: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Dutch Barnidipine Multicenter Study Group

The antihypertensive effects and tolerance of once-daily barnidipine, a novel dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, were evaluated. A total of 190 patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 95-114 mmHg were investigated in this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. After a 4-week single-blind placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to placebo or barnidipine (10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg modified release capsules) once daily for 6 weeks. Nonresponders (sitting DBP > or =90 mmHg and a decrease of < 10 mmHg) were treated for an additional 6 weeks with a dose increase of 10 mg. At each clinic visit, sitting and standing blood pressure and heart rate were measured approximately 24 hours after the last dose of study drug was taken. Compared with placebo, barnidipine lowered blood pressure, with a trend toward a dose-response relationship over the dose range 10-30 mg. A dose increment of 10 mg in nonresponders resulted in additional reductions in blood pressure. At the end of the active treatment period, the responder rates were 41% and 57% for 10 mg and 20 mg barnidipine, respectively. Heart rate in both sitting and standing positions was not affected by barnidipine. Treatment with barnidipine was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was dose related and consistent with vasodilatation. In conclusion, barnidipine (10-30 mg) administered once daily is well tolerated and reduces blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.     

Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group

Intravenously administered ciprofloxacin was compared with imipenem for the treatment of severe pneumonia. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, which included an intent-to-treat analysis, a total of 405 patients with severe pneumonia were enrolled. The mean APACHE II score was 17.6, 79% of the patients required mechanical ventilation, and 78% had nosocomial pneumonia. A subgroup of 205 patients (98 ciprofloxacin-treated patients and 107 imipenem-treated patients) were evaluable for the major efficacy endpoints. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous treatment with either ciprofloxacin (400 mg every 8 h) or imipenem (1,000 mg every 8 h), and doses were adjusted for renal function. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were bacteriological and clinical responses at 3 to 7 days after completion of therapy. Ciprofloxacin-treated patients had a higher bacteriological eradication rate than did imipenem-treated patients (69 versus 59%; 95% confidence interval of -0.6%, 26.2%; P = 0.069) and also a significantly higher clinical response rate (69 versus 56%; 95% confidence interval of 3.5%, 28.5%; P = 0.021). The greatest difference between ciprofloxacin and imipenem was in eradication of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (93 versus 65%; P = 0.009). Stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated the following factors to be associated with bacteriological eradication: absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P < 0.01), higher weight (P < 0.01), a low APACHE II score (P = 0.03), and treatment with ciprofloxacin (P = 0.04). When P. aeruginosa was recovered from initial respiratory tract cultures, failure to achieve bacteriological eradication and development of resistance during therapy were common in both treatment groups (67 and 33% for ciprofloxacin and 59 and 53% for imipenem, respectively). Seizures were observed more frequently with imipenem than with ciprofloxacin (6 versus 1%; P = 0.028). These results demonstrate that in patients with severe pneumonia, monotherapy with ciprofloxacin is at least equivalent to monotherapy with imipenem in terms of bacteriological eradication and clinical response. For both treatment groups, the presence of P. aeruginosa had a negative impact on treatment success. Seizures were more common with imipenem than with ciprofloxacin. Monotherapy for severe pneumonia is a safe and effective initial strategy but may need to be modified if P. aeruginosa is suspected or recovered from patients.     

Efficacy and safety of enalapril versus extended-release nifedipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter 22-week study. Multicenter Cooperative Study Group

The antihypertensive effects and tolerability of single daily doses of enalapril and extended-release nifedipine (nifedipine-ER) were compared in an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 22-week treatment study involving 230 men and women (mean age, 55 years). Following a 3-week washout period, mean +/- SD blood pressure levels were 153 +/- 17/99 +/- 4 mmHg in the enalapril group (n = 117) and 157 +/- 17/100 +/- 5 mmHg in the nifedipine-ER group (n = 113). Beginning at 5 mg once daily for enalapril and 30 mg once daily for nifedipine-ER, the dosage was titrated every 4 weeks for 16 weeks, up to a maximum of 40 mg for enalapril and 120 mg for nifedipine-ER. The treatment goal (satisfactory response) was to lower trough sitting diastolic blood pressure to < 90 mmHg or by at least 10 mmHg to a level of < 100 mmHg. At a mean daily dose of 16 mg of enalapril and 57 mg of nifedipine-ER, more than three quarters of each treatment group achieved a satisfactory response. The mean reductions in trough sitting blood pressure levels at the end of 22 weeks of treatment were 15/11 mmHg for enalapril and 21/13 mmHg for nifedipine-ER. The difference between treatments was significant only for the change in systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). However, enalapril was better tolerated than nifedipine-ER. The numbers of patients with adverse experiences and withdrawals from the study because of an adverse experience were significantly lower for enalapril than for nifedipine-ER (P < 0.05). The incidence of abnormal laboratory findings was small and considered of no clinical importance in either group. These data suggest that enalapril and nifedipine-ER had approximately equal efficacy as once-daily antihypertensive treatments, but enalapril was better tolerated.     

A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson's disease. Ropinirole Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nonergot dopamine agonist ropinirole as an adjunct to L-dopa in a randomized, double-blind trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations. BACKGROUND: L-dopa in the treatment of PD is associated with motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and other adverse effects. The use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD delays recourse to L-dopa and thus delays the possibility of adverse effect onset. METHODS: Ropinirole (n = 95) or placebo (n = 54) was added to L-dopa, and L-dopa was then reduced in a planned manner during the 6-month trial. RESULTS: A significantly greater number of ropinirole patients were able to achieve a 20% or greater reduction in both L-dopa dose and in percent time spent "off" compared with placebo (35.0% versus 13.0%; p = 0.003). The mean daily L-dopa dose was reduced significantly with ropinirole treatment (242 mg versus 51 mg; p < 0.001) as was the percent awake time spent "off" (11.7% versus 5.1%; p = 0.039). There was no difference in the percent of patients who withdrew because of adverse effects (15.8% on ropinirole versus 16.7% on placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Ropinirole permits a reduction in L-dopa dose with enhanced clinical benefit for PD patients with motor fluctuations.     

A multicenter randomized Phase II trial of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-supported, platinum-based chemotherapy with flexible midcycle cisplatin administration in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. PSAMOMA Cooperative Group, Spain

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to platinum-based combination chemotherapy could increase platinum dose intensity and response rates and decrease hematologic toxicity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced ovarian carcinoma (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage IIC-IV) were treated after maximum debulking surgery with cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2, and carboplatin, 350 mg/m2, on Day 1 plus cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, on Day 14 when clinically indicated (adequate bone marrow and renal function). Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy supported with G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously on Days 2-13; Arm B). RESULTS: Between November 1993 and April 1995, 80 patients were included. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for dose intensity calculations. Both groups were well matched with regard to age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histopathologic subtype, tumor grade, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. The dose intensities calculated in mg/m2/week for cyclophosphamide and carboplatin were similar in both groups; however, the dose intensity of cisplatin was higher in Arm B (5.7 mg/m2 vs. 10.3 mg/m2). The occurrence of Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3-4 neutropenia was less common in the G-CSF arm (55% vs. 7.7%). Response rates (52% vs. 68%) and pathologic complete responses (32% vs. 25%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS; The addition of G-CSF to this platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma resulted in a modest increment in platinum dose intensity and appeared to reduce the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia.     

Paroxetine in the treatment of Chinese patients with depressive episode: a double-blind randomized comparison with imipramine

The application of the concept of ray vector fields to optical systems is reexamined. Paraxial or linear optics defines a four-dimensional ray vector field for any optical system: the vector field maps the incident ray vector into the emergent ray vector. In the case of thin systems, including thin astigmatic lenses, one can define a vector field of reduced dimensionality: the vector field is two-dimensional and maps the ray's incident position into the change in reduced direction. When the index of refraction is the same before and after a thin system, the change in reduced direction is the reduced deflection through the system or the reduced prismatic effect. Contrary to what has recently been claimed, this type of two-dimensional vector field does not apply in general to thick systems. However, a number of different types of two-dimensional vector fields can be defined for various particular classes of optical systems. Thick systems differ qualitatively from thin systems. They do not have equivalent thin lenses and cannot generally be replaced by thin lenses. Equations are derived for the change in reduced direction and deflection for a ray through optical systems in general and through separated two- and three-lens systems in particular.     

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefepime hydrochloride plus metronidazole vs the combination of imipenem and cilastatin sodium in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adult patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospitals in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections in whom an operative procedure or percutaneous drainage was required for diagnosis and management. INTERVENTION: Cefepime, 2 g, was administered intravenously every 12 hours (n= 164) in addition to metronidazole, 500 mg (or 7.5 mg/kg) intravenously every 6 hours. Imipenen-cilastatin sodium, 500 mg, was administered intravenously every 6 hours (n= 159). Surgical infection management was determined by the patients' surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: Clinical cure, defined as elimination of all signs and symptoms relevant to the original infection; and treatment failure, defined as persistence, increase or worsening of signs and symptoms resulting in an antibiotic change, requirement of an additional surgical procedure to cure the infection, or a wound infection with fever. RESULTS: Of the initial isolates, 84% were susceptible to cefepime and 92% were susceptible to imipenem-cilastatin. Among the 217 protocol-valid patients, those treated with cefepime+metronidizole were deemed clinical cures (88%) more frequently than were imipenem-cilastatin-treated patients (76%) (P=.02). Using multivariate analysis to adjust for identified clinical risk factors for an adverse outcome (severity of presenting illness, isolation of enterococcus, type of infection, and duration of prestudy hospitalization), there was a trend (P=.06) toward a higher cure rate favoring cefepime+metronidazole. Pathogens were eradicated in significantly (P=.01) more patients treated with combined cefepime and metronidazole (89%) than with imipenem-cilastatin (76%). CONCLUSION: The combination of cefepime plus metronidazole is safe and effective therapy for patients with severe intra-abdominal infections.     

The treatment of severe hypertension with trandolapril, verapamil, and hydrochlorothiazide. Trandolapril/Verapamil Multicenter Study Group

A multiple drug regimen consisting of trandolapril, verapamil and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were sequentially added in an open-label evaluation of patients with severe hypertension. Ninety patients (58 white and 32 black patients) were titrated on one or more drugs and followed for a 19-week maintenance period. Statistically significant (P = 0.001) mean (+/-s.d.) decreases in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 9.0 (+/-9.3) mm Hg for trandolapril, 13.9 (+/-11.0) mm Hg for the trandolapril + verapamil (TV) combination, and 19.0 (+/-12.3) mm Hg when hydrochlorothiazide was added to the combination. The decrease in BP observed on TV combination therapy plus HCTZ was significantly (P = 0.001) greater than the decrease observed for the TV combination, which was significantly (P = 0.001) greater than the decrease observed for trandolapril monotherapy. Clinical responder rates were 44.8%, 56% and 77.7% for trandolapril monotherapy, trandolapril + verapamil combination therapy and triple therapy, respectively. Black and white patients had similar response rates, but black patients appeared to benefit more from the addition of HCTZ; 20% of black patients achieved a post-treatment supine DBP <90 mm Hg compared to 12.8% of white patients. This study demonstrates that the addition of verapamil to trandolapril has an additive effect on BP that is maintained throughout the day.     

Efficacy of famotidine in the healing of active benign gastric ulceration: comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory- or aspirin-induced gastric ulcer and idiopathic gastric ulceration. Long Island Jewish Medical Center Acid-Peptic Study Group

Seventy-one of 85 consecutive patients with endoscopically confirmed active benign gastric ulcers completed an 8-week study to evaluate the effects on healing of famotidine 40 mg given as a single dose at night. The healing rate in the 48 patients in whom the ulcers were associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or aspirin (ASA) use was compared with that in the 23 patients with idiopathic ulcers. Endoscopy, symptom assessments, antacid use, hematology, and serum chemistry were performed at weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Famotidine 40 mg at bedtime healed 63 (89%) of the 71 ulcers at 8 weeks; the healing rate for NSAID/ASA-associated ulcers was 46 (96%) of 48, which was significantly greater than that for idiopathic ulcers (17 of 23; 74%) (P = 0.0119). Of the 54 patients who returned a questionnaire 1 to 2 years after completing the study, 20% were still taking an NSAID/ASA (mainly for cardiovascular prophylaxis). About half of the patients surveyed were taking anti-ulcer medication. None of these patients had experienced any serious ulcer complication. The results of this study suggest that differentiating NSAID/ASA-induced ulcers from idiopathic ulcers may be important with regard to healing rates and duration of therapy.     

Video-laparoscopic staging of gastric cancer. A prospective multicenter comparison with noninvasive techniques

BACKGROUND: The high proportion of gastric carcinomas present in an unresectable stage, together with the emergence of multimodal treatments, increases the usefulness of objective staging methods that avoid unnecessary laparotomies. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of the accuracy of laparoscopy in the staging of 71 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma is presented. Serosal infiltration, retroperitoneal fixation, metastasis to lymph nodes, peritoneal and liver metastasis, and ascites were determined in the staging workup. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated and compared with those obtained with ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy in the determination of resectability was 98.6%. Consequently, over 40% of patients were spared unnecessary laparotomies. Laparoscopy yielded diagnostic indices superior to US and CT for all the tumoral attributes studied. Our technique permits accurate assessment and pathologic verification of liver and the peritoneal and retroperitoneal extent of tumor invasion in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy in gastric adenocarcinoma is a reliable technique that provides accurate assessment of resectability and stage, thus avoiding unnecessary laparotomies in patients in whom surgical palliation is not indicated. A stepwise diagnostic workup combining imaging and minimally invasive techniques is proposed.     

A randomized double-blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Myasthenia Gravis Study Group

Noninvasive alternatives to esophageal pressure (Pes) are needed to evaluate respiratory effort during sleep. Pulse transit time (PTT) is the time taken for pulse pressure to travel from the aortic valve to the periphery. PTT has been shown to be inversely correlated with blood pressure, and can reveal acute changes generated by high pleural pressure swings during pulsus paradoxus. A close relationship has been demonstrated between the increase in Pes and a progressive rise in the amplitude of PTT oscillations. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of PTT for the classification of sleep respiratory events as central or obstructive. Respiratory events occurring during sleep were randomly chosen from 13 unselected male patients (mean apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] = 25.1 per hour of sleep; age = 47.3 yr, body mass index [BMI] = 27.1 kg/m2). Two observers experienced in polysomnography classified 177 events on the basis of the "gold standard method": the measurement of Pes. For 167 events about which the observers agreed, the PTT signal was analyzed visually and independently by the two observers blinded to Pes, in order to reclassify the same sleep respiratory events. The two observers were in agreement for 94.6% of the events scored visually on PTT recordings. We evaluated sensitivity (Se) (Observer 1: 94%, Observer 2: 91%), specificity (Sp) (97% and 95%, respectively), negative predictive value (NPV) (95% and 92%, respectively), and positive predictive value (PPV) (96% and 94%, respectively), of PTT with Pes as the reference. Misclassifications of respiratory episodes were usually due to artifacts or baseline variations of the PTT signal (57%), and occurred during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (42.8%). PTT has shown a high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating obstructive and central respiratory events, and may become the reference noninvasive tool for this purpose.     

Effectiveness and cost of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill intubated patients. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial

We evaluated the effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and its associated morbidity and cost in a mixed population of intubated patients. Two hundred seventy-one consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of five teaching hospitals and who had an expected need for intubation exceeding 48 h were enrolled and received topical antibiotics or placebo. Uninfected patients additionally received ceftriaxone or placebo for 3 d. VAP occurred in 11.4% of SDD-treated and 29.3% of control-group patients (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.8 to 27.9). The incidence of nonrespiratory infections in the two groups was 19.1% and 30.7%, respectively (p = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.7 to 22.7). Among survivors, the median length of ICU stay was 11 d (interquartile range: 7 to 21.5 d) for the SDD-treated group and 16. 5 d (10 to 30 d) for the control group (p = 0.006). Mean cost per survivor was $11,926 for treated and $16,296 for control-group patients. Mortality was 38.9% and 47.1%, respectively (p = 0.57). In decontaminated patients, the prevalence of gram-negative bacilli fell within 7 d from 47.4% to 13.0% (p < 0.001), whereas colonization with resistant gram-positive strains was higher (p < 0. 05) than in the placebo group. In a mixed population of intubated patients, SDD was associated with a significant reduction of morbidity at a reduced cost. Our findings support the use of SDD in this high-risk group.     

Corticosteroids in the treatment of tuberculous pleurisy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

Although several studies on tuberculous (TB) pleurisy suggest that the addition of corticosteroids to anti-TB therapy may have beneficial effects, these agents are not used routinely. To assess the effects of short-term oral prednisone therapy in TB pleurisy, 74 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to treatment with either placebo or prednisone at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg/d for up to 4 weeks with gradual reduction over an additional 2 weeks. All subjects received a standard 3-drug anti-TB chemotherapy regimen for 6 months. TB pleurisy was diagnosed by histologic study and/or culture of pleural biopsy specimens obtained at thoracoscopy. Complete drainage of the effusion was performed simultaneously. Outcome measures were assessed periodically for 24 weeks, including indexes of morbidity and pleural thickening. After randomization, four patients were excluded from the final analysis. Of the 70 patients analyzed, 34 received prednisone and 36 received placebo. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the treatment groups were comparable at the time of hospital admission. Although a statistically significant improvement in symptoms occurred earlier in the prednisone group (8 weeks) than in the placebo group (12 weeks), between-group comparison showed no significant differences at any of the follow-up evaluations. The proportion of subjects in the prednisone group (53.1%) with residual pleural thickening at 6 months did not differ significantly from that of the placebo group (60%). Pleural effusions did not recur in any of the patients. Initial complete drainage of the effusion was associated with greater symptomatic improvement than any subsequent therapy. We conclude that standard anti-TB therapy and early complete drainage is adequate for the treatment of TB pleurisy. The addition of short-term oral prednisone therapy neither results in clinically relevant earlier symptom relief nor confers a beneficial effect on residual pleural thickening.