Physical diagnosis skills of physicians in training: a focused assessment

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proficiency of emergency medicine (EM) trainees in the recognition of physical findings pertinent to the care of the critically ill patient. METHODS: Fourteen medical students, 63 internal medicine (IM) residents, and 47 EM residents from three university-affiliated programs in Philadelphia were tested. Proficiency in physical diagnosis was assessed by a multimedia questionnaire targeting findings useful in emergencies or related to diseases frequently encountered in the ED. Attitudes toward diagnosis not based on technology, teaching practices of physical examination during EM training, and self-motivated learning of physical diagnosis also were assessed for all the EM trainees. RESULTS: With the exception of ophthalmology, the EM trainees were never significantly better than the senior students or the IM residents. They were less proficient than the IM residents in cardiology, and not significantly different from the IM residents in all other areas. For no organ system tested, however, did they achieve less than a 42.9% error rate (range: 42.9-72.3%, median = 54.8%). There was no significant improvement in proficiency over the three years of customary EM training. The EM residents who had received supervised teaching in physical diagnosis during training achieved a significantly higher cumulative score. The EM residents attributed great clinical importance to physical diagnosis and wished for more time devoted to its teaching. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the recently reported deficiencies of physical diagnosis skills among physicians in training. The results are particularly disturbing because they relate to EM trainees and concern skills useful in the ED. Physical diagnosis should gain more attention in both medical schools and residency programs.     

Predoctoral training in collaborative primary care: An exam room built for two.

Psychologists have discovered new training and practice opportunities by collaborating with family physicians. This article describes a collaborative practicum experience in which predoctoral psychology students teamed with family medicine residents to provide care for family medicine outpatients. Psychology students improved their clinical skills and reported learning valuable collaborative skills. Family medicine residents increased their postpracticum mental health diagnoses and their mental health referrals and changed their attitudes about providing mental health care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

A strategy for improving patient satisfaction by the intensive training of residents in psychosocial medicine: a controlled, randomized study

PURPOSE: To use a controlled, randomized design to assess the effect on patient satisfaction of an intensive psychosocial training program for residents. METHOD: Twenty-six first-year residents, in two internal medicine and family practice community-based programs affiliated with the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, were randomly assigned during 1991 and 1992 to a control group or a one-month intensive training program. Experiential teaching focused on many psychosocial skills required in primary care. A 29-item questionnaire administered before and after the residents' training evaluated their patients' satisfaction regarding patient disclosure, physician empathy, confidence in physician, general satisfaction, and comparison of the physician with other physicians. Analyses of covariance with groups and gender as factors and pre-training patient satisfaction scores as the covariate evaluated the effect of the training. RESULTS: The patients of the trained residents expressed more confidence in their physicians (p = .01) and more general satisfaction (p = .02) than did the patients of controls. The effect of training on patient satisfaction with patient disclosure (p < .01) and physician empathy (p < .05) was greater for female than for male residents. CONCLUSION: The intensive psychosocial training program for residents improved their patients' satisfaction.     

Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of resident and attending physician gender on the evaluation of residents in an internal medicine training program. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large urban academic internal medicine residency program. PARTICIPANTS: During their first 2 years of training, 132 residents (85 men, 47 women) received a total of 974 evaluations from 255 attending physicians (203 men, 52 women) from 1989 to 1995. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measurements were the numerical portions of the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation form. Separate analyses were performed for each of the nine evaluation dimensions graded on a scale of 1 to 9. The primary outcome was the difference in the average scores received by each resident from male versus female attending physicians. RESULTS: Compared with female trainees, male residents received significantly higher scores from male attending physicians than from female attending physicians in six of the nine dimensions: clinical judgment, history, procedures, relationships, medical care, and overall. Similar trends, not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, were observed in the other three categories: medical knowledge, physical exam, and attitude. These differences ranged from 0.24 to 0.60 points, and were primarily due to higher grading of male residents by male attending physicians than by female attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In one academic training program, we found a significant interaction in the grading process between the gender of internal medicine residents and the gender of their attending evaluators. This study raises the possibility that subtle aspects of gender bias may exist in medical training programs.     

Factors associated with family physicians' involvement in research in Israel

OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that encourage or deter family medicine physicians and residents in Israel from participating in research. METHOD: In October 1995, a questionnaire containing items on demographic variables, research attitudes, and academic and research activities in primary care settings was mailed to a random sample of 200 family medicine physicians and residents (out of approximately 600) employed by the General Sick Fund, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel. The questionnaire also contained items regarding difficulties in participating in research and asked for opinions about several general statements about research in family practice. RESULTS: In all, 190 physicians responded, for a response rate of 95%. Based on their responses, the respondents were divided into four groups by amount of research involvement. Univariate analysis using the chi-square test was used for the comparison of variables among the four groups. The respondents reporting greater knowledge of and involvement in research were, by and large, men (p = .01) who were qualified specialists with academic status (p < .00001). They also taught students (p = .0005) and residents (p < .0005), participated in more conferences (p < .0005), and while in residency training had had a mentor who encouraged involvement in research (p = .0001). CONCLUSION: Research is essential to family medicine with regard to both primary care practice and academic activities, its development, however, has been inhibited. Given the results of this preliminary study, family medicine residency programs would be well advised to assign a research mentor to every resident; also, time and resources should be devoted to research in postgraduate training programs. Perhaps more important, women physicians in Israel should be encouraged to participate more actively in research, and support for them in their special needs should be made available.     

Training for rural family medicine: a cooperative venture of government, university, and community in Alberta

Training, recruiting, and retaining family physicians in rural areas are issues that have attracted the attention of governments, university training programs, medical governing bodies, and rural communities. In this article, the authors describe a cooperative venture between government, university, and community in the province of Alberta to train medical students and residents in rural areas. The Rural Physician Action Plan (RPAP) was developed in the early 1990s to improve the recruitment and retention of physicians in rural areas. The RPAP is coordinated by a committee composed of representatives of the Alberta government, the Alberta Medical Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, and the faculties of Medicine at the University of Alberta and the University of Calgary. Residents in the University of Alberta Department of Family Medicine are required to do 20 weeks of blocktime training in a community practice, and under the auspices of the RPAP rural training sites were identified and rural rotations developed. Faculty development activities were developed for the community physicians who would host the residents. The RPAP funds 24 third-year residency positions, equally divided between the University of Calgary and the University of Alberta. Beginning in 1994, undergraduate medical students at the University of Alberta were required to complete a four-week family medicine rotation, with a majority of students being posted to rural training sites. The extent to which the RPAP has helped to recruit and retain physicians in rural areas is not clear. The provincial Ministry of Health evaluated the RPAP in 1995 and concluded that, at a minimum, without the RPAP the province would have suffered a net loss of rural physicians. The communities have been very accepting and supportive of the students and residents.     

Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: differences between family practice and general internal medicine

OBJECTIVES: This study compared patient health status, patient satisfaction, and physician practice style between family practice and internal medicine. METHODS: New adult patients (n = 509) were prospectively and randomly assigned to family practice or internal medicine clinics at a university medical center and followed for 1 year of care. Practice styles were characterized by the Davis Observation Code. Self-reported health status (Medical Outcomes Study, Short Form-36) and patient satisfaction also were measured. RESULTS: There were no significantly different changes in self-reported health status or patient satisfaction between family practice and internal medicine physicians during the course of the study. Family practice initial encounters, however, were characterized by a style placing greater relative emphasis on health behavior and counseling, whereas internists used a more technical style. Improved health status scores after treatment were predicted by a practice style emphasis on counseling, whereas improvements in patient satisfaction scores were predicted by a style of care stressing patient activation. Although this is the first known randomized trial studying this issue, the conclusions are limited by a 38% loss of patients from enrollment to care and a loss of 18% at the 1-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in practice styles between family physicians and internists; however, it was the physician's behavior, not specialty per se, that affected patient outcomes. A practice style emphasizing psychosocial aspects of care was predictive of improvements in patient health status, whereas a practice style emphasizing patient activation was predictive of improvements in patient satisfaction.     

Isotopic ventriculography in healthy young volunteers. Their response to different types of stress

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study determined the perceived characteristics of family practice residency training programs that produce a high percentage of graduates who provide maternity care. METHODS: We surveyed a Delphi panel of 28 family practice maternity care experts. RESULTS: Consensus was reached after the third survey. The characteristics of the family medicine faculty and teaching service were rated as most important. Other essential characteristics were an adequate obstetrical training volume; mutual respect between obstetric and family medicine faculty and residents; support for family practice maternity care from obstetricians, administration, and nursing staff; and family physicians being accepted in the community as maternity care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Family practice residency programs that produce a high percentage of graduates who provide maternity care have a unique, family practice maternity care-friendly environment. Residency programs wishing to increase the percentage of their graduates who provide maternity care should ensure that their faculty support family practice maternity care, are competent in maternity care, and model maternity care in their own practices. They should strive to ensure an adequate volume of obstetrical cases for resident education and work toward educating patients and local obstetricians, nursing staff, and hospital administration regarding family practice maternity care.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery of malignant and benign intracranial lesions utilizing a patient rotator

The objective of this survey was to demonstrate whether a primary care track internal medicine residency program emphasizing community-based health care of the urban sick poor trains physicians who will continue to practice in general internal medicine or similar fields. Thirty-five primary care residents (100% of graduates) who trained from 1976 through 1993 in the Adult Primary Care Track of the Internal Medicine Residency Program at St. Vincent's Hospital, New York were used as participants.     

Results of the 1995 National Resident Matching Program: family practice

The 1995 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results broke records in the number of positions filled in family practice residencies, with an increase of 11.8% over 1994 figures (2,563 vs 2,293) and an increase of 12.5% in positions filled with US seniors (2,081 vs 1,850). This is the largest number of US seniors choosing family practice in the NRMP's history. In keeping with the trend that began in 1992, 7% more positions were filled on July 1, 1995, than were filled at the same time in 1994 (3,252 vs 3,040). Internal medicine residencies matched 74 more US seniors in 1995, and pediatric residencies matched 84 more US seniors. Given the anticipated career choices of students entering residency training in the generalist disciplines (95% of students matching in family practice, 60% of students matching in pediatrics, and 45% of students matching in internal medicine), it is expected that 33.5% of the class of 1995 (Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical schools) will practice as generalists. First-year positions offered in family practice through the NRMP increased 6%, and the number of Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs increased 3% (421 vs 410). With continued increased interest in family practice as a career choice and the need for more family physicians, support for the nation's family practice residency programs continues to be of critical importance.     

Physician awareness of alcohol use disorders among older patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine primary care physicians' awareness of, and screening practices for, alcohol use disorders (AUDs) among older patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey of a national sample of primary care physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians randomly sampled from the Masterfile database of the American Medical Association and stratified by specialty as family practice physicians, internal medicine physicians, and either family practice or internal medicine physicians with geriatric certification. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 171 physicians were contacted: 155 (91%) agreed to participate, and responses were analyzed from 150 (50 family practice, 50 internal medicine, 50 with geriatric certification). The median prevalence estimate of AUDs among older patients was 5% for each group of physicians. In contrast to published prevalence rates of AUDs ranging from 5% to 23%, 38% of physicians reported prevalence estimates of less than 5%, and 5% cited estimates of at least 25%. Compared with the other groups, the physicians with geriatric certification were more likely to report no regular screening (42% vs 20% for family practice vs 18% for internal medicine, p = .01), while younger (<40 years) and middle-aged physicians (40-55 years) reported higher annual screening rates relative to older physicians (>55 years) (77% vs 60% vs 44% respectively, p = .03). Among physicians who regularly screened (n = 110), 100% asked quantity-frequency questions, 39% also used the CAGE questions, and 15% also cited use of biochemical markers. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians may "underdetect" AUDs among older patients. The development of age-specific screening methods and physician education may facilitate detection of older patients with (or at risk for) these disorders.     

Survey reveals physicians'' experiences with cults

In late June 1992, a stratified random sample of Pennsylvania physicians (5,400) were mailed a two-page questionnaire asking about experiences with destructive cults, either personal, professional, or both. Professional experience was defined as "with patients or their families," and personal experience was defined as "with self, family, or friends." The survey sample group was drawn from primary care physicians (family practice, general practice, internal medicine, and pediatrics) and psychiatrists. Surveys were returned by 1,396 participants, a 26 percent rate of return. A number of the returned surveys (173) included personal observations and comments.     

Market influences on internal medicine residents' decisions to subspecialize

BACKGROUND: Managed care reduces the demand for internal medicine subspecialists, but little empirical information is available on how increasing managed care may be affecting residents' training choices. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increased managed care penetration into an area where residents train was associated with a decreased likelihood that residents who completed general internal medicine training pursued subspecialty training. DESIGN: Secondary logistic regression analysis of data from the 1993 cohort of general internal medicine residents. SETTING: U.S. residency training sites. PARTICIPANTS: 2263 U.S. medical school graduates who completed general internal medicine residency training in 1993. MEASUREMENTS: The outcome variable (enrollment in subspecialty training) was derived from the Graduate Medical Education Tracking Census of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Health maintenance organization (HMO) penetration (possible range, 0.0 to 1.0; higher values indicate greater penetration) was taken from the Interstudy Competitive Edge Database. Individual and medical school covariates were taken from the AAMC's Student and Applicant Information Management System database and the National Institutes of Health Information for Management Planning, Analysis, and Coordination system. The U.S. Census division was included as a control covariate. RESULTS: 980 participants (43%) enrolled in subspecialty training. Logistic regression analyses indicated a nonlinear association between managed care penetration into a training area and the odds of subspecialization. Increasing managed care penetration was associated with decreasing odds of subspecialization when penetration exceeded 0.15. The choice of subspecialty training increased as HMO penetration increased from 0 to 0.15. CONCLUSIONS: Local market forces locally influenced the career decisions of internal medicine residents, but the influence was small compared with the effects of age and sex. These results suggest that market forces help to achieve more desirable generalist-to-specialist physician ratios in internal medicine.     

The service-education linkage: implications for family practice residency programs and community and migrant health centers

INTRODUCTION: Access to quality primary health care for our country's underserved populations is a challenge for both the government and physicians. The Division of Medicine, through funding priorities and other initiatives, is encouraging family practice educators to train residents and students for work in community and migrant health centers (C/MHCs) in underserved areas. The objective of this research was to study linkages between family practice residency programs and C/MHCs and determine the reasons for affiliation, disadvantages and advantages, predictors of successful linkages, and common errors in the linkage agreement. METHODS: We conducted in-depth telephone interviews with the directors of 13 of the 19 family practice residency programs identified as having linkages with C/MHCs. RESULTS: All interviewees at residency programs indicated that their programs had a mission to serve underserved patients. The most commonly cited constraining factor cited by both residency programs and C/MHCs was financial support for residents, on-site faculty, and support staff. Many programs reported that residents training at the C/MHC were able to gain a community health perspective and practice community-oriented primary care. Finally, financing the relationship involved many different approaches, ranging from the residency paying all of the salaries, to a sharing of salaries by the residency, state, and/or hospital, to C/MHC paying the salaries either through its own funds or through grant support. DISCUSSION: These data provide an assessment of the current issues that family practice residencies must address to implement service-education linkages. They provide an empirical basis to outline the steps involved in forming a linkage between a residency and a C/MHC.     

Resident training in nursing home care: survey of successful educational strategies

OBJECTIVE: To identify educational strategies for resident training in nursing home care deemed successful by a large number of programs. DESIGN: A mail survey with three follow-up mailings. PARTICIPANTS: Directors of accredited internal medicine and family practice residency programs. MEASUREMENTS: Open- and closed-ended questionnaire eliciting curricular content, instructional strategies, and evaluation techniques from programs offering a nursing home experience. Identification of barriers to implementation of a nursing home curriculum and recommendations for success were requested. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 814 surveys mailed, 537 were returned for a response rate of 66%. Nursing home experiences were required in 86% of family practice residency programs but in only 25% of internal medicine programs. Most geriatric medicine curricular content areas were taught in the nursing home; however, relatively little emphasis was given to rehabilitation, organization, and financing of health care, and coordination of care between acute and chronic settings. Direct patient care, bedside rounds, and lectures were the most common instructional strategies reported. Evaluation approaches included faculty observations, resident attendance, and chart reviews with written and skill-based examinations infrequent. Availability of faculty and conflict with other rotations were identified as the principal barriers to implementation of nursing home rotations. An organized nursing home curriculum supervised by enthusiastic faculty using a longitudinal rotation format with resident involvement in an interdisciplinary team was recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Educational strategies exist for successful implementation of a residency nursing home curriculum. Greater priority must be given to training residents in nursing home care and developing nursing home faculty to substantially increase the number and quality of physicians who practice in this setting.     

Physicians' perceptions of the role of psychology in medicine.

Surveyed 80 physicians at the University of Kansas Medical Center on their perceptions of psychology's role in medicine. The sample included residents and staff physicians from 4 medical specialities: family practice, internal medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry. It was found that the problems perceived as having the largest psychological component were depression, alcoholism, obesity, and headaches. Medical problems seen as having minimal psychological components were cancer, heart disease, and arthritis. Ss expressed an interest in treating the psychological components of medical illness themselves. They also reported that they would consult psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers on an equal basis for treating these problems. (13 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Internal medicine training in ambulatory gynecology. A house of staff survey

OBJECTIVES: Practicing internists commonly provide gynecologic care, yet internists receive little formal training in ambulatory gynecology. To evaluate current residency training, we surveyed house staff perceptions of their training in gynecology. METHODS: Data were collected from house staff at five Portland, Ore, internal medicine training programs by questionnaire using a Likert scale about training in 24 gynecologic and five nongynecologic internal medicine problems. Responses were compared by level of training, institution, and gender. RESULTS: Responses were received from 195 (89%) of 221 residents. House staff reported less than adequate training in gynecology, particularly in the areas of family planning and medical complications of pregnancy, while reporting much superior training in the traditional medicine problems. CONCLUSIONS: House staff in internal medicine report little training in the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic problems. Training in family planning may be particularly deficient. Residency programs must seek effective teaching strategies to address this deficiency.     

Early ambulatory experience in the undergraduate education of family physicians

A number of benefits have been claimed for early ambulatory experience in the training of family physicians, although few practical examples have been reported. This paper describes an approach to the education of first and second year medical students interested in family medicine which places heavy emphasis on community-based ambulatory care. During the first year, an elective introductory preceptorship permits students to participate in the office practice of a family physician in a limited role. Seminars are offered concurrently to provide integrating principles and perspective. In the second year, a nine-month-long continuity clerkship is offered in which students gain intimate contact with a small panel of families and practice the skills of primary care in the offices of family physicians. Clinical experience is accompanied by weekly seminars and integrated with elements of the required curriculum. Selected evaluation data are presented, which attest to the achievement of course objectives and provide support for the claim that this approach is beneficial to students seeking careers in primary care.