Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

Compatibility studies of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)–poly(ether imide)–polycarbonate ternary blends

Binary blends of the sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)–poly(ether imide) (PEI) and SPEEK–polycarbonate (PC), and ternary blends of the SPEEK–PEI–PC, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. SPEEK was obtained by sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone) using 95% sulfuric acid. From the thermal analysis of the SPEEK–PEI blends, single glass transition temperature (T_g) was observed at all the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, double T_gs were observed. From the results of thermal analysis, it is suggested that the SPEEK–PEI blends are miscible and the SPEEK–PC blends are immiscible. Polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) of the SPEEK–PEI blends was calculated from the modified Lu and Weiss equation, and found to range from −0.011 to −0.825 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PC blends, the χ₁₂ values were calculated from the modified Flory–Huggins equation, and found to range from 0.191 to 0.272 with the blend composition. For the SPEEK–PEI–PC ternary blends, phase separation regions that showed two T_gs were found to be consistent with the spinodal curves calculated from the χ₁₂ values of the three binary blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2488–2494, 2000     

Reactively formed ENPT copolymers as compatibilizers in ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide)

The compatibility of ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PEN/PPT/PEI) was studied by examining the transesterification of PEN and PPT. ENPT copolymers were formed in situ as compatibilizers between PPT and PEI components in ternary blends. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) results for ternary blends showed the immiscibility of PEN/PPT/PEI, but ternary blends of all compositions were phase‐homogeneous after heat treatment at 300°C for more than 60 min. Annealing samples at 300°C yielded amorphous blends with a clear, single glass transition temperature (T_g), as the final state. Additionally, ENPT copolymer improved the compatibility of ENPT/PPT/PEI blends, yielding a homogeneous phase in the ENPT‐rich compositions. The morphology of the ENPT/PPT/PEI blends was altered from heterogeneous to homogeneous by controlling the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymers as well as the concentration of the ENPT copolymers. Moreover, a homogeneous phase with a clear T_g was observed when the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymer fell to 70 wt% in the ENPT/PEI = 50/50 blends. Experimental results indicate how the concentration of PPT in the ENPT copolymer affects miscibility in the ENPT/PEI blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:337–343, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Phase and crystallization behavior of solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide)

Results on solution-blended poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) blends are reported. Dichloroacetic acid was used as the cosolvent for blending. PEEK and PEI are confirmed to be miscible in the melt. The glass transition, T_g, behavior obeys the simple Fox equation or the Gordon-Taylor equation with the adjustable coefficient k = 0.86. This agrees with prior data on melt-blended PEEK/PEI blends. The T_g width of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends was found to be broader than that of the pure components. The maximum broadening is about 10°C. The specific volume of the amorphous PEEK/PEI blends shows a slight negative deviation from linearity, indicating favorable interaction between PEEK and PEI. The spherulitic growth and resultant blend morphology at 270°C were studied by a cross-polarized optical microscope. The radial growth rate of PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible melt at 270°C decreases from 3.04 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 90/10 blend to 0.77 μm/min for PEEK/PEI 70/30 blend. The decrease in crystalization rate of PEEK from PEEK/PEI blends is attributable to the increase in blend T_g. A linear growth was observed for PEEK spherulites formed from miscible melt at 270°C in the early growth stage. The spherulitic growth deviated from linearity in the late stage of growth. PEEK spherulites formed from the miscible PEEK/PEI melt at 270°C are essentially volume-filling. The branches of the spherulites become more clear for PEEK spherulites formed from the blend than that formed from pure PEEK melt.     

Miscibility and transesterification in ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide)

Miscibility and morphology of poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PEN/PPT/PEI) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (¹H‐NMR), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). OM and DSC results from ternary blends revealed the immiscibility of PEN/PPT/PEI blends, but ternary blends of all compositions were phase‐homogeneous following heat treatment at 300°C for over 60 min. Annealing samples at 300°C yielded an amorphous blend with a clear and single T_g at the final state. Experimental data from ¹H‐NMR revealed that PEN/PPT copolymers (ENPT) were formed by the so‐called transesterification. The effect of transesterification on glass transition and crystallization was discussed in detail. The sequence structures of the copolyester were identified by triad analysis, which showed that the mean sequence lengths became shorter and the randomness increased with heating time. The results reveal that a random copolymer improved the miscibility of the ternary blends, in which, the length of the homo segments in the polymer chain decreased and the crystal formation was disturbed because of the irregularity of the structure, as the exchange reaction proceeded. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 3840–3849, 2006     

Thermal properties of melt‐blended poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide)

The thermal properties of blends of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by screw extrusion were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. From the thermal analysis of amorphous PEEK–PEI blends which were obtained by quenching in liquid nitrogen, a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and negative excess heat capacities of mixing were observed with the blend composition. These results indicate that there is a favorable interaction between the PEEK and PEI in the blends and that there is miscibility between the two components. From the Lu and Weiss equation and a modified equation from this work, the polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) of the amorphous PEEK–PEI blends was calculated and found to range from −0.058 to −0.196 for the extruded blends with the compositions. The χ₁₂ values calculated from this work appear to be lower than the χ₁₂ values calculated from the Lu and Weiss equation. The χ₁₂ values calculated from the T_g method both ways decreased with increase of the PEI weight fraction. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 733–739, 1999     

Miscibility and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and melting behavior of binary crystalline blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) have been investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscope. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) and the measured T_g fit well with the predicted T_g value by the Fox equation and Gordon‐Taylor equation. In addition to that, a single composition‐dependent cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) value can be observed and it decreases nearly linearly with the low T_g component, PTT, which can also be taken as a valid supportive evidence for miscibility. The SEM graphs showed complete homogeneity in the fractured surfaces of the quenched PET/PTT blends, which provided morphology evidence of a total miscibility of PET/PTT blend in amorphous state at all compositions. The polymer–polymer interaction parameter, χ₁₂, calculated from equilibrium melting temperature depression of the PET component was ?0.1634, revealing miscibility of PET/PTT blends in the melting state. The melting crystallization temperature (T_mc) of the blends decreased with an increase of the minor component and the 50/50 sample showed the lowest T_mc value, which is also related to its miscible nature in the melting state. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Compatibilized poly(ether imide)/amorphous polyamide blends by means of poly(ethylene terephthalate) addition

Compatibilized poly(ether imide)/amorphous polyamide (PEI/a‐PA) blends were obtained in the melt state by substitution of 20% PEI by poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET. The two amorphous phases of the blends comprised both a miscibilized 80/20 PEI/PET blend and an a‐PA‐rich phase in which small amounts of PET and probably PEI were present. The presence of PET in the two phases of most of the blends was the main reason for the clear decrease in the particle size that indicated compatibilization. The smaller interfacial tension of the blends after PET addition also proved that compatibilization had occurred. The deviation of the modulus with respect to the direct rule of mixtures was positive in PEI‐rich blends and negative in the blends very rich in a‐PA. The modulus values were tentatively attributed to a different orientation of the components of the blends in the blends and in the neat state. The clear increases in ductility and the impact strength after PET addition further demonstrated the compatibilization effect of PET. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46: 1292–1298, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends were studied. Four compositions of the blends [PET 25/PMMA 75, PET 50/PMMA 50, PET 75/PMMA 25, and PET 90/PMMA 10 (w/w)] were melt‐blended for 1 h in a batch reactor at 275°C. Crystallization peaks of virgin PET and the four blends were obtained at cooling rates of 1°C, 2.5°C, 5°C, 10°C, 20°C, and 30°C/min, using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). A modified Avrami equation was used to analyze the nonisothermal data obtained. The Avrami parameters n, which denotes the nature of the crystal growth, and Z_t, which represents the rate of crystallization, were evaluated for the four blends. The crystallization half‐life (t_½) and maximum crystallization (t_max) times also were evaluated. The four blends and virgin polymers were characterized using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), a wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction unit (WAXD), and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3565–3571, 2006     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends

The crystallization kinetics of a melt‐miscible blend, consisting of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by solution precipitation, has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy and differential scanning calorimeter. It was found that both the PTT spherulitic growth rate (G) and overall crystallization rate constant (k_n) were depressed, with increasing PEI composition or crystallization temperature (T_c). The kinetic retardation was attributed to the decrease in PTT molecular mobility, and the dilution of PTT concentration due to the addition of PEI, which has a higher glass transition temperature (T_g). According to the Lauritzen–Hoffman theory of secondary nucleation, the crystallization of PTT in blends was similar to that of neat PTT as regime III, n = 4 and regime II, n = 2 growth processes, while the transition point of regime III to II has been shifted from 194°C for neat PTT to 190°C for blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:89–96, 2006. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Lamellar morphology of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) blends studied via small‐angle X‐ray scattering

The lamellar morphology of a melt‐miscible blend consisting of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) prepared by solution precipitation has been investigated by means of optical polarized microscopy (POM) and small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). From the observation under POM, it was suggested that PEI was predominantly segregated into the interlamellar and/or interfibrillar regions upon PTT crystallization since the PTT spherulitic morphologies of blends were volume‐filling. From results of SAXS data analysis, a larger amorphous layer thickness was identified in the blends, showing that some PEI was incorporated inside the interlamellar regions after crystallization. Despite the swelling of the amorphous layer, the amorphous layer thickness was relatively independent of the blend composition. It was concluded that amorphous PEI was located in the interlamellar regions of PTT as the weight fraction of PEI (w_PEI) [≤] 0.1, while amorphous PEI was predominantly segregated into the interfibrillar regions of PTT as w_PEI > 0.1, and the extent of interfibrillar segregation increased with increasing w_PEI. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006     

Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on the solid‐state polymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and end‐capped poly(ethylene glycol) (poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (PEGDME)) of number average molecular weight 1000 g mol^?1 was melt blended with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) oligomer. NMR, DSC and WAXS techniques characterized the structure and morphology of the blends. Both these samples show reduction in T_g and similar crystallization behavior. Solid‐state polymerization (SSP) was performed on these blend samples using Sb₂O₃ as catalyst under reduced pressure at temperatures below the melting point of the samples. Inherent viscosity data indicate that for the blend sample with PEG there is enhancement of SSP rate, while for the sample with PEGDME the SSP rate is suppressed. NMR data showed that PEG is incorporated into the PET chain, while PEGDME does not react with PET. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of nylon 66/ poly(ether imide) blends

The morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of blends of poly(ether imide) (PEI) and nylon 66 over the full composition range have been invesigated. Torque changes during mixing were also measured. Lowertorque values than those calculated by the log-additivity rule were ontained, resulting from the slip at the interface due to low interaction between the componeents. The particle size of the dispersed phase and morphology of the blends were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The composition of each phase was calculated. The blends of PEI and nylon 66 showed phase-seoarated structures with small spherical domains of 0.3 ～ 0.7 μm. The glass transition temperatures (T_gg) of the blends were shifted inward, compared with those of the homopolymers, which implied that the blends were partially imiscible over a range of compositions. T_g1, corresponding to nylon 66-rich phase. This indicated that the fraction of PEI mixed into nylon 66-rich phase increased with decreasing PEI content and that nylon 66 was rerely mixed into the PEI-rich phase. The effect of composition of the secondary relaxations was examined. Both T_β, corresponding to the motion of amide groups in nylon 66. and T_γ′, corresponding to that of either groups in PEI, were shifted to higher temperature, probably because of the formation of intermolecular interactions between the components.     

Thermal properties and morphology of blends of poly(ether imide) and polycarbonate

Blends of poly(ether imide) (PEI) and bisphenol-A polycarbonate (PC) have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Three different molecular weights of polycarbonate have been used in the PEI-PC blends. Blends were prepared by screw extrusion and solution casting with weight fractions of PEI in the blends varying from 0.90 to 0.10. From the measured glass transition temperature (T_g), the maximum decrease of T_g(PEI) is observed for 0.9 weight fraction PEI in the PEI-PC blends. In the study of the morphology, the size of minor component domains (about 0.1 to 0.3 µm) in the 90/10 PEI-PC blend is small compared to the size of minor component domains (about 0.2 to 2.0 µm) in the 10/90 PEI-PC blend. This morphological behavior is attributed mainly to the difference of viscosity ratio between the dispersed phase and continuous phase. No considerable differences in the thermal behavior and morphologies have been observed among the blends of PEI and PC having different molecular weights.     

Role of 2‐hydroxyethyl end group on the thermal degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and reactive melt mixing of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) blends

In an attempt to minimize the acetaldehyde formation at the processing temperatures (280–300°C) and the outer–inner transesterification reactions in the poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET)–poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) melt‐mixed blends, the hydroxyl chain ends of PET were capped using benzoyl chloride. The thermal characterization of the melt‐mixed PET–PEN blends at 300°C, as well as that of the corresponding homopolymers, was performed. Degradations were carried out under dynamic heating and isothermal conditions in both flowing nitrogen and static air atmosphere. The initial decomposition temperatures (T_i) were determined to draw useful information about the overall thermal stability of the studied compounds. Also, the glass transition temperature (T_g) was determined by finding data, indicating that the end‐capped copolymers showed a higher degradation stability compared to the unmodified PET and, when blended with PEN, seemed to be efficient in slowing the kinetic of transesterification leading to, for a finite time, the formation of block copolymers, as determined by ¹H‐NMR analysis. This is strong and direct evidence that the end‐capping of the ? OH chain ends influences the mechanism and the kinetic of transesterification. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of molecular weight on phase structure of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The phase structure of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends was studied in relation to the molecular weight. The samples were prepared by both solution blends, which showed two glass‐transition temperatures (T_g), and melt blends (MQ), which showed a single T_g, depending on the composition of the blends. The T_g of the MQ series was independent of the molecular weight of the homopolymer, although the degree of transesterification in the blends was affected by the molecular weight. The MQ series showed two exotherms during the heating process of a differential scanning calorimetry scan. The peak temperature and the heat flow of the exotherms were affected by the molecular weight of the homopolymers. The strain‐induced crystallization of the MQ series suggested the independent crystallization of PET and PEN. Based on the results, a microdomain structure of each homopolymer was suggested. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2428–2438, 2005     

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and a polyarylate before and after transesterification

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and a copolyester of bisphenol A–terephthaloylisophthaloyl (PAr) (2:1:1) have been studied both before and after transesterification. The physical blends exhibit phase separation in their amorphous states: a pure PET phase and a mixed PAr-rich phase. In spite of this phase separation, PET crystallinity in blends, normalized to PET fraction, surprisingly goes through a maximum at 25% PAr content. The transesterfied copolymers are noncrystallizable and exhibit a single T_g between those of starting polymers, PET and PAr.     

The interchange reaction between poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(m‐xylylene adipamide)

The interchange reaction in blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) (MXD6) has been characterized in terms of changes observed in spectra obtained with a 600‐MHz ¹H‐NMR. The selective degradation of PET components in the blends was carried out in the NMR tubes prior to evaluation. Results indicate that there is no chemical reaction between the PET and MXD6 in the absence of sodium p‐toluenesulfonate catalyst. The presence of the catalyst activates the interchange reaction between these two resins. A mathematical method was applied to calculate the degree of randomness of PET‐MXD6 copolymer. In addition, the reaction degree was found to be affected by exposure temperature, time, shear rate, and catalyst concentration. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Rheology of a textured fluid consisting of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and nylon 6,6

The rheology and development of the texture of immiscible polymer blends based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and nylon 6,6 at composition ratios of 75/25, 50/50, and 25/75 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 were studied. The blends were prepared by mixing in an extruder and by dry blending and mixing between cone-and-plate fixtures in a nitrogen atmosphere. The rheology of these blends was found to be a function of both polymer degradation and the two-phase morphology. An accelerated degradation rate in air was observed for the 75/25 and 50/50 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 blends relative to the neat polymers while the blend at a weight ratio of 25/75 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 displayed a rate of degradation similar to that of the neat polymers. The values of the steady shear viscosity (η), |η^*| storage modulus (G′), and steady-state first normal stress difference (N₁) for melt-blended 75/25 and 50/50 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 samples were lower than those of the neat polymers and were determined to be a consequence of the higher rate of degradation of these blends during extrusion relative to that of the neat polymers. The role played by the two-phase nature on the blends was observed for all samples prepared by dry blending and mixing in cone-and-plate fixtures under a nitrogen atmosphere and for the melt-blended 25/75 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 blend. The two-phase nature of the dry-blended samples and the extruded 25/75 w/w PET/nylon 6,6 sample resulted in values of |η^*|, η, G′, and N₁ which were higher than those of the neat polymers. Transient behavior observed for the blends using stepwise changes of shear rate was found to superimpose when plotted in reduced form, indicating that at rates lower than the longest relaxation time of the neat polymers there was no intrinsic time constant associated with the deformation of the interface in the blends. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.