Risk of myocardial infarction, angina and stroke in users of oral contraceptives: an updated analysis of a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine has shown less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine, and comparatively low muscle-blocking properties could constitute another advantage when used epidurally for obstetric pain relief. We aimed primarily to compare maternal and foetal drug disposition following continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine or bupivacaine. METHODS: Twenty-four full-term, nulliparous women were randomized to continuous epidural infusion (10 ml/h) of ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml for labour pain relief in a double-blind, parallel-group design. Maternal blood samples were collected up to 24 h after the end of infusion as well as taken from the umbilical cord at the time of delivery. Sensory and motor block as well as analgesia were assessed. All the women were monitored by cardiotocography and neonatal assessment was performed. RESULTS: The sensory block was adequate for both drugs. Higher plasma levels (total and free) were seen with ropivacaine, although the infusion with bupivacaine continued on average for about 2 hours longer. However, the ratios between maternal and umbilical blood concentrations were similar for both drugs. Normal neonatal Apgar and neonatal adaptive capacity scores (NACS) were found in both groups. CONCLUSION: A continuous epidural infusion of 25 mg/h ropivacaine or bupivacaine both produced good labour pain relief. Higher total and free plasma concentrations were seen for ropivacaine. The ratios between maternal and umbilical plasma levels were similar for both drugs.     

Comparison between extradural infusion of ropivacaine or bupivacaine for the prevention of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty

We have compared the analgesia and motor block produced by extradural infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after total knee arthroplasty. Fifty-two patients received 8 ml h1 of either 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% bupivacaine by extradural infusion for 24 h after operation. Analgesia was assessed by postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and morphine consumption. At rest these were low in both groups; median VAS was 0-13.3 mm for the ropivacaine group and 0-0.5 mm for the bupivacaine group. Over the 24 h of the infusion, the estimated (ropivacaine bupivacaine) difference in wound pain at rest was 5.6 mm (P = 0.017) and on passive movement 11.6 mm (P = 0.016). Median morphine consumption was 30.7 mg in the ropivacaine group and 20.5 mg in the bupivacaine group. In the ropivacaine group, 50% of patients compared with 19% in the bupivacaine group had no motor block 2 h after operation, increasing to 88% for ropivacaine and 56% for bupivacaine by 24 h. Bupivacaine produced significantly more frequent and intense motor block over the 24 h (P = 0.015).     

Schizophrenia and the dopamine-beta-hydroxylase gene: results of a linkage and association study

PURPOSE: A dose-finding study to investigate the use of epidural infusions of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia following orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind study. Surgery was performed using a combination of a lumbar epidural block utilizing ropivacaine 0.5% and a standardized general anaesthetic. Postoperatively, an epidural infusion of the study solution (saline, ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3%) was started at the rate of 10 ml.hr-1 and continued for 21 hr after arrival in the PACU. Analgesia was supplemented with PCA morphine (dose = 1.0 mg, lock-out = 5 min). RESULTS: Forty-four patients completed the study. The ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% groups required less morphine over the 21 hr than the saline group (P < 0.01). The VAS pain scores were also lower in the three ropivacaine groups (P < 0.001). The ropivacaine groups maintained sensory anaesthesia to pinprick when compared with saline (P < 0.05). The motor block in the 0.3% group was significantly higher than the saline group at all times (P < 0.05), and higher than the 0.1% group at eight hours (P < 0.01), while the 0.2% group had higher Bromage scores than saline at 4 and 21 hr (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of continuous epidural infusions of ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% at 10 ml.hr-1 improved postoperative pain relief and decreased PCA morphine requirements in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. The 0.1% and 0.2% concentrations produced similar sensory anaesthesia with less motor blockade than the 0.3% concentration.     

Comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Part 1: To measure ropivacaine levels in the mother and infant at delivery after continuous lumbar epidural infusion. Part 2: To compare epidural ropivacaine to epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia in regard to effectiveness, motor blockade, and maternal and neonatal effects. DESIGN: Part 1: Open-labelled, non-blind study. Part 2: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Labor and delivery units of two academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Part 1: 20 ASA physical status I and II parturients in active labor. Part 2: 81 ASA physical status I and II parturients in active labor. INTERVENTIONS: For Part 1, 8 to 12 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered through a lumbar epidural catheter to achieve a T10 dermatomal sensory level. An infusion of 0.25% ropivacaine, 8 to 10 ml/hr, maintained this sensory level. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples obtained at delivery were analyzed for ropivacaine concentration. For Part 2, anesthetic management was similar to that previously described except patients were randomized to receive either 0.25% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine. Onset, regression, maximal spread of sensory block, and onset and degree of motor blockade were measured. Contraction pain as assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), maternal blood pressure, and heart rate were determined every 5 minutes until a stable VAS-contraction score was achieved, and every 30 minutes thereafter. Neonatal assessment included Apgar scores and neurologic and adaptive capacity scores (NACS) at 15 minutes, 2 hours, and 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For Part 1, the total and free maternal arterial concentrations of ropivacaine at delivery were 0.64 +/- 0.14 microgram/ml and 0.10 +/- .02 microgram/ml, respectively; the umbilical venous total and free concentrations were 0.19 +/- 0.03 microgram/ml and 0.12 +/- 0.07 microgram/ml, respectively (n = 12). The umbilical arterial and venous concentrations did not differ for both the free and total concentrations. For Part 2, there was no difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in the variables measured. Umbilical cord gases and Apgar scores were not different between the two groups; NACS were higher at 15 minutes and 2 hours in the ropivacaine group (p < 0.05) than the bupivacaine group. CONCLUSION: Both ropivacaine and bupivacaine produced excellent analgesia for labor with no major adverse effect on the mother or neonate.     

A comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block

The onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during an interscalene block are not known. The potentially improved safety profile of ropivacaine may allow the use of higher concentrations to try and speed onset time. We compared bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anesthetic and concentration for interscalene brachial plexus block. Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for outpatient shoulder surgery under interscalene block were entered into this double-blind, randomized study. Patients were assigned (n = 25 per group) to receive an interscalene block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.75% ropivacaine. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. At 1-min intervals after local anesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of shoulder abduction and loss of pinprick in the C5-6 dermatomes. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time of first oral narcotic use, when incisional discomfort began, and when full sensation returned to the shoulder. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was <6 min in all groups. Duration of sensory blockade was similar in all groups as defined by the three recovery measures. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference in times to onset and recovery of interscalene block for bupivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5%, and ropivacaine 0.75% when injected in equal volumes. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we demonstrated a similar efficacy between equal concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In addition, increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.5% to 0.75% fails to improve the onset or duration of interscalene brachial plexus block.     

Mucosal melanomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of epidural analgesia on biochemical markers of stress, plasma oxytocin concentrations and frequency of uterine contractions during the first stage of labour. METHODS: Nine nulliparous women, in spontaneous labour, with a singleton fetus and cervical dilatation < or = 5 cm were enrolled. Epidural bupivacaine 0.25% (range 10-14 ml) was administered and bilateral sensory blockade to ice (T8-L4) achieved. Blood samples were collected before the epidermal block and every 10 min for one hour after the block was achieved for the measurement of plasma beta-endorphin, cortical, glucose, lactate and oxytocin concentrations. No exogenous oxytocin was given. Intensity of pain was assessed at the time of the blood sampling using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The frequency of uterine contractions was recorded for 60 min before and after the epidural block. RESULTS: There was a decrease in plasma beta-endorphin and cortisol concentrations after epidural block (P < 0.01). There were no changes in plasma glucose and lactate concentrations. The mean VAS for pain decreased 10 min after epidural block was achieved and remained < 2 throughout the study period (P < 0.001). Mean plasma oxytocin concentrations did not change. The frequency of uterine contractions before and after the epidural block was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic stress response to the pain of labour was attenuated by epidural analgesia. In contrast, plasma oxytocin concentration and frequency of uterine contractions were unaffected by the attenuation of metabolic stress response.     

Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml for elective caesarean section. A clinical and pharmacokinetic comparison of 150 mg and 187.5 mg

BACKGROUND: The new, long-acting local anaesthetic ropivacaine has shown less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine and a concentration of 7.5 mg/ml can therefore be used for epidural anaesthesia in Caesarean section. The present pilot study was undertaken to find indications for an optimal dosage by comparing the clinical effects, quality of anaesthesia and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine 150 mg (lower dose = LD) vs 187.5 mg (higher dose = HD) for women undergoing elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: Sixteen full-term women scheduled for elective Caesarean section in two equal-sized consecutive groups received 20 or 25 ml ropivacaine epidurally in this non-randomised, open study. Study parameters included sensory and motor blockade, circulatory response, intraoperative pain and discomfort, neonatal evaluation and pharmacokinetic determinations. RESULTS: Block height varied between T5 and T2 in the LD group, whereas the HD group produced 4 unnecessarily high blocks (C8 in 3 women and C7 in 1 woman). Surgical anaesthesia was excellent in both groups. Circulatory stability was pronounced in the LD group (no ephedrine given), while 4 women required ephedrine in the HD group. Neonatal outcome as judged by Apgar scores; umbilical blood gas determinations and NACS scores were excellent in both groups. The plasma concentration-time profiles indicated linearity in the concentration range studied, with similar clearance values to those reported previously. Placental drug equilibrium was rapid; however, the foetal drug exposure depended on intrauterine exposure time. CONCLUSIONS: 20-25 ml ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml produced very satisfactory conditions for elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. In this small population, 150 mg ropivacaine seemed optimal, while 187.5 mg produced unnecessarily extended block height in 50% of the women.     

Estimating the prevalence of delayed median nerve conduction in the general population

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of 25 patients after abdominal aortic surgery, we compared patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with epidural versus intravenous pethidine. All patients received continuous epidural infusions of 0.125% bupivacaine adjusted to maintain appropriate sensory levels. The 48 hour study period commenced 36 to 48 hours after surgery and covered postoperative days 2 and 3. There was a crossover in PCA mode (epidural or intravenous) after 24 hours. Plasma pethidine concentration at the end of each 24 hour period and the total 24 hour pethidine dose did not change significantly between postoperative days 2 and 3. Pethidine plasma concentration was lower after 24 hours epidural than after intravenous PCA [125 (SD 108) ng/ml versus 171 (SD 107) ng/ml, P = 0.03], although pethidine dose did not differ significantly [mean 147 (SD 124) mg/24 h]. Visual analog pain scores (VAS) did not differ significantly between postoperative days 2 and 3, or at rest between epidural and i.v. groups. However, VAS with coughing and with abdominal palpation were lower in the epidural PCA group (P = 0.05, 0.008). With a background epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine, PCA with epidural pethidine provided better pain control than PCA intravenous pethidine and this was achieved at lower plasma pethidine concentrations.     

Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 for pain relief during labour

We have assessed the dose-response relationship of a solution of ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1, given as a continuous extradural infusion to women in labour. A total of 133 parturients were allocated randomly to one of four groups to receive a fixed rate ropivacaine infusion of 4, 6, 8 or 10 ml h-1 with additional bolus doses as necessary. Contraction pain, quality of analgesia, sensory block, motor block and neonatal Apgar scores were assessed. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of analgesia or motor block, although significantly more bolus doses were required by the group receiving 4 ml h-1 (P < 0.05 compared with the other groups), and a significantly higher total dose of ropivacaine was administered to the 10-ml h-1 group compared with the 6-ml h-1 group (P = 0.044). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of obstetric or neonatal outcome. We conclude that ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 was effective and well tolerated when given as a continuous extradural infusion at 6-8 ml h-1 and may be used as the sole analgesic during labour.     

Diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in experimental mice and field-infected camels by detection of antibody to trypanosome tyrosine aminotransferase

We designed this double-blind study to evaluate the effect of adding small-dose ketamine in a multimodal regimen of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Ninety-one patients, ASA physical status I-III, undergoing major surgery, received a standardized general anesthesia and epidural catheterization in an appropriate intervertebral space after surgery. A PCEA device was programmed to deliver a regimen of morphine 0.02 mg/mL, bupivacaine 0.8 mg/mL, and epinephrine 4 microg/mL, with the addition of ketamine 0.4 mg/mL (ketamine, n = 45) or without (control, n = 46). The mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores during cough or movement for the first 3 days after surgery were higher in the control group than in the ketamine group (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VAS score at rest for the first 2 days were higher in the control group than in the ketamine group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients in the control group consumed more multimodal analgesics than patients in the ketamine group for the first 2 days (P < 0.05). The sedation scores and the incidence of side effects (pruritus, nausea, emesis, sleep deprivation, motor block, and respiration depression) were similar between the two groups. We conclude that adding ketamine 0.4 mg/mL in a multimodal PCEA regimen provides better postoperative pain relief and decreases consumption of analgesics. Implications: Many studies have evaluated one or a combination of two analgesics for postoperative pain control, but few have examined a multimodal approach using three or four different epidural analgesics. This study demonstrates an additive analgesic effect when ketamine is added to a multimodal analgesic treatment.     

Metabolic changes during recovery in normothermic versus hypothermic patients undergoing surgery and receiving general anesthesia and epidural local anesthetic agents

BACKGROUND: Mild hypothermia is accompanied by metabolic changes. Epidural local anesthetic agents attenuate the surgical stress response, but it is not known whether they modulate thermal stress. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing colorectal surgery, performed by one surgical team, received epidural 0.5% bupivacaine to achieve T3-S5 sensory block. They were then assigned randomly to two groups of 15 patients each. The control or unwarmed group was left to cool during surgery, whereas active warming was used in the warmed group. General anesthesia was induced by thiopentone, vecuronium, fentanyl, nitrous oxide in oxygen, and enflurane. At the end of surgery, both groups received epidural 0.25% bupivacaine to maintain a T5-L3 sensory block. Aural canal (core) and skin surface (15 sites) temperatures; oxygen consumption; pain visual analogue score; and concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucose, cortisol, lactate, and free fatty acids in plasma were measured before epidural blockade, 30 min after epidural blockade, at the end of surgery, and for 4 h after surgery. Patients and those measuring the outcomes were unaware of group allocation. RESULTS: Core and mean skin temperatures decreased significantly in the control group (P < 0.001) but not in the warmed group. Catecholamine concentrations in plasma decreased significantly after epidural block, and although concentration of epinephrine in plasma increased from baseline sharply in the control group at the end of surgery (P = 0.004), it decreased in the warmed group (P = 0.007). During recovery, there was no difference between the two groups for norepinephrine concentrations in plasma, body weight-adjusted oxygen consumption, pain visual analogue score, and metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative metabolic changes obtained with epidural block were similar except for an attenuated concentration of epinephrine in normothermic patients compared with those who were mildly hypothermic.     

Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia and its management--a literature review

The purpose of our study was to find out whether patient-controlled epidural administration (PCEA) of a mixture containing a low-dose local anaesthetic, opioid and alpha 2-agonist provides as good or better postoperative analgesia as continuous epidural administration of the same analgetic solution. METHODS: 30 patients (ASA I-III), scheduled for major abdominal surgery, were randomly divided into 2 groups. 90 minutes after induction of general anaesthesia all patients received a continuous epidural infusion of 5 ml/h of the analgetic solution (50 micrograms sufentanil + 150 micrograms clonidine in 50 ml 0.125% bupivacaine) until the end of surgery. Immediately postoperatively the patients of group A received a continuous infusion of the study solution (5-8 ml/h), the patients of group B received a baseline continuous epidural infusion (3 ml/h), additionally they could self-administer 5 ml boli via a PCEA device. Measurements included the total dose of infused drug solution, pain at rest and on exercise by a visual analogue scale, cardiorespiratory data and side effects within the first 24 hours postoperatively. A standardised interview on analgesia and side effects was held 2 days after surgery. RESULTS: The PCEA group demanded less epidural analgesics (gr. B: 112 +/- 33 ml vs. gr. A: 135 +/- 20 ml) p < 0.01). Both continuous epidural infusion and patient-controlled administration provided very good analgesia at rest (gr. A: VAS 0.4 +/- 0.4 and gr. B: VAS 0.4 +/- 0.5) (n.s.). On exercise continuous epidural infusion of analgesics resulted in significantly lower pain scores (gr. A: 1.9 +/- 1.1) than patient-controlled application (gr. B: 3.4 +/- 1.1) (p < 0.01). We did not notice severe side effects such as respiratory depression or drop of heart rate or blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In patients at rest both continuous and patient-controlled epidural administration of analgesics provides excellent analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Contrariwise, patients on exercise who could use a PCA-device experienced more pain compared to those with a continuous epidural infusion technique. On the other hand the patients of the PCA-group consumed less epidural analgesics. We did not notice any severe side effects such as respiratory depression or cardiovascular instability during the study.     

Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline

BACKGROUND: Basic pharmacological research indicates that there are synergistic antinociceptive effects at the spinal cord level between adrenaline, fentanyl and bupivacaine. Our clinical experience with such a mixture in a thoracic epidural infusion after major surgery confirms this. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects on postoperative pain intensity, pain relief and side effects when removing adrenaline from this triple epidural mixture. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, cross-over study was carried out in 24 patients after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Patients with only mild pain when coughing during a titrated thoracic epidural infusion of about 10 ml.h-1 of bupivacaine 1 mg.ml-1, fentanyl 2 micrograms.ml-1, and adrenaline 2 micrograms.ml-1 were included. On the 1st and 2nd postoperative days each patient was given a double-blind epidural infusion, at the same rate, with or without adrenaline. The effect was observed for 4 h or until pain when coughing became unacceptable in spite of a rescue analgesic procedure. Rescue analgesia consisted of up to two epidural bolus injections per hour and i.v. morphine if necessary. All patients received rectal paracetamol 1 g, every 8 h. Fentanyl serum concentrations were measured with a radioimmunoassay technique at the start and end of each study period. Main outcome measures were extent of sensory blockade and pain intensity at rest and when coughing, evaluated by a visual analogue scale, a verbal categorical rating scale, the Prince Henry Hospital pain score, and an overall quality of pain relief score. RESULTS: The number of hypaesthetic dermatomal segments decreased (P < 0.001) and pain intensity at rest and when coughing increased (P < 0.001) when adrenaline was omitted from the triple epidural mixture. This change started within the first hour after removing adrenaline. After 3 h pain intensity when coughing had increased to unacceptable levels in spite of rescue analgesia (epidural bolus injections and i.v. morphine). Within 15-20 min after restarting the triple epidural mixture with adrenaline, pain intensity was again reduced to mild pain when coughing. Serum concentration of fentanyl doubled from 0.22 to 0.45 ng.ml-1 (P < 0.01), and there was more sedation during the period without adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenaline increases sensory block and improves the pain-relieving effect of a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl infused epidurally at a thoracic level after major thoracic or abdominal surgery. Serum fentanyl concentrations doubled and sedation increased when adrenaline was removed from the epidural infusion, indicating more rapid vascular absorption and systemic effects of fentanyl.     

The effect of supervision of residents on quality of care in five university-affiliated emergency departments

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the analgesic and side effects of two epidurally administered mixtures of bupivacaine and fentanyl with the same drug ratios. METHODS: One hundred patients scheduled for colorectal surgery were randomized to receive a thoracic epidural infusion of either bupivacaine 0.12% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml or bupivacaine 0.24% with fentanyl 4 micrograms/ml during 48 h postoperatively. The pumps were adjusted to keep the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at 3 or less (on a scale of 0-10) with a minimum of adverse effects. RESULTS: There were no statistically significantly differences between the two groups in VAS pain scores. The average VAS pain score resting varied between 0.5 and 1, and coughing between 1.9 and 3.4. One case of respiratory depression with breathing frequency 7 occurred in each group, but none of the patients required naloxone. One patient in the low concentration group developed partial motor weakness in both legs 36 h postoperatively. Equal drug amounts--bupivacaine 10.8-11 mg/h and fentanyl 18-18.4 micrograms/h--were given in both groups throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups had low pain scores with few and comparable adverse effects. It thus seems that the volume is not important when mixtures of bupivacaine and fentanyl in the studies concentrations are infused epidurally at a low thoracic level. Practical reasons favour the higher concentration mixture.     

Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.375% bupivacaine in paediatric patients

We have determined the effectiveness and degree of motor block produced by the new local anaesthetic, ropivacaine, when used for caudal anaesthesia in children. We studied 60 children, aged 3-6 yr, ASA I, allocated randomly in a double-blind manner, to receive one of two local anaesthetics: 0.375% ropivacaine 1.0 ml kg-1 or 0.375% bupivacaine 1.0 ml kg-1. Patients were anaesthetized with continuous infusion of propofol 200 micrograms kg-1 min-1. The lungs were ventilated with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Heart rate and arterial pressure were measured every 5 min after administration of local anaesthetic until discharge from the recovery room. The extent of motor block in the recovery room was scored as 1-3. Adverse events and time to first analgesic requirements were recorded. Patients in the two groups did not differ in age, weight or height. There were no differences in heart rate or arterial pressure between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. The degree of motor block was significantly different between the two groups. The ropivacaine group showed a shorter duration of motor block than the bupivacaine group (P < 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was required at a mean time of 5 (SD 3.2) h in the ropivacaine group compared with 5 (2.8) h in the bupivacaine group. These findings suggest that caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine in paediatric patients is effective and produces less motor block in the postoperative period.     

Tat-induced lesions in transgenic mice do not correlate with the HIV-1 LTR transactivation

A pilot study was conducted in 7 normal volunteers to demonstrate the feasibility of employing pharmacokinetic tailoring to achieve matching plasma opioid concentration-time curves after epidural (e.p.) and intravenous (i.v.) alfentanil administration. Each subject participated in 1 pretest and 2 test sessions. Our pain model was cutaneous electrical stimulation of the finger and toe, adjusted to produce a baseline pain report of 5 (strong pain on a 0-5 scale). On test day 1, subjects received e.p. alfentanil (750 micrograms) and an i.v. saline infusion. Serial measurements of analgesia, end tidal CO2, pupil size, subjective side effects, and plasma alfentanil concentrations were conducted before and at various time intervals over a 4-h period after alfentanil administration. On test day 2, subjects received e.p. saline and a pharmacokinetically tailored i.v. infusion (using individual pharmacokinetics determined on the pretest day) designed to achieve a plasma concentration-time profile identical to that observed on the epidural day. The same battery of effect measurements was administered as on the 1st test day. Plasma alfentanil was measured to verify the accuracy of the tailored infusion. Plasma alfentanil concentration profiles were nearly identical on both test days. Peak plasma alfentanil concentrations were near the reported minimum effective analgesic concentration (MEAC). Overall, analgesia was slightly greater with e.p. administration. Onset of pain relief was rapid, and duration was approximately 1.5 h with e.p. and 1 h with i.v. alfentanil. There were no differences in pupil size, ETCO2, or subjective side effects between e.p. versus i.v. administration. We conclude that systemic redistribution from the epidural space appears to account for most, but not all, of the analgesia.     

Continuous analgesia with a femoral catheter: plexus or femoral block?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the spread and quality of sensitive blockade produced by continuous and prolonged use of a femoral catheter inserted for postoperative analgesia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective non comparative evaluation. PATIENTS: The study included 20 consecutive patients undergoing major knee surgery with postoperative analgesia obtained with a femoral catheter, a technique commonly used in our department. METHODS: Regional analgesia was induced after surgery with a bolus injection of 30 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine 1 in 200,000, maintained by continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine + morphine 0.03 mg.mL-1 + clonidine 2 micrograms.mL-1 for 48 h. The infusion rate was 0.1 mL.kg-1.h-1. The evaluation was based on: 1) the quality of analgesia at rest, at 30 min, h1, h3, h6, h12, h24 and h48; 2) the sensitive and motor blockade at the same time intervals. RESULTS: A "3 in 1" block was only observed in 50% of patients after the initial bolus via the femoral catheter. During the maintenance of analgesia with a continuous infusion a blockade of the three main nerves of the lumbar plexus occurred in less than 20% of patients after 6 h and was limited to the territory of the femoral nerve in 45 to 50% of patients after 12 to 48 h. In all cases the median values of VAS were below 42 mm. CONCLUSION: In most patients, a local anaesthetic administered continuously via a femoral catheter produces a blockade limited to the femoral nerve. These data do not substantiate the conclusions by those who consider they are producing a continuous "3 in 1" block with this technique. However, it is obviously not essential to produce a sensitive blockade of the three main nerves of the lumbar plexus to obtain an effective analgesia after knee surgery.     

Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient

The effectiveness of two epidural analgesic regimens on the ability to ambulate was compared in women in labor by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One group of patients received epidural fentanyl, a 75-micrograms bolus and an infusion of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/mL at 15 mL/h (FENT, n = 53). A second group received ultra low-dose bupivacaine (0.04%), epinephrine (1.7 micrograms/mL), and fentanyl (1.7 micrograms/mL) (BEF, n = 77), a 15-mL bolus followed by an infusion at 15 mL/h. Adequate analgesia was rapidly obtained in 90.6% of patients in the FENT group and 92.2% of patients in the BEF group (P = 0.89). Seventy percent of patients in the FENT group ambulated versus 68% in the other group. The BEF mixture provided analgesia of longer duration (287 +/- 171 min versus 156 +/- 72 min, P = 0.0001). The number of patients delivering during administration of only their study drug (without needing higher doses of local anesthetics) was 52% for BEF and 21% for FENT (P = 0.0005). Hip flexion weakness precluding ambulation occurred in 17% (P = 0.002) of BEF patients and orthostatic hypotension in 9% (P = 0.08). Neither problem occurred in FENT patients. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Approximately 70% of women receiving epidural analgesia with fentanyl or ultra low-dose bupivacaine, epinephrine, and fentanyl may ambulate safely during labor.     

Redistribution of sufentanil to cerebrospinal fluid and systemic circulation after epidural administration in dogs

Due to its higher lipid solubility, sufentanil may be less likely than morphine to migrate rostrally in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and cause delayed respiratory depression following epidural administration. However, early respiratory depression has been reported in patients after relatively large doses of epidural sufentanil. This has been attributed to systemic drug uptake. We used a dog model to investigate the pharmacokinetics and rostral spread of epidural sufentanil in CSF. Sampling catheters were placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space, the cisterna magna, and femoral arteries of six mongrel dogs. Samples of cisternal CSF, lumbar CSF, and blood were drawn at 0, 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min after lumbar epidural sufentanil injection. We measured sufentanil concentrations by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and used the least squares method to a fit tri-exponential function to each sufentanil concentration versus time data set. Paired t-test was used to test for statistical significance. After epidural sufentanil, lumbar CSF concentrations were significantly higher than plasma or cisternal CSF sufentanil concentrations at all assessment times. Sufentanil concentrations were significantly higher in cisternal CSF than in plasma at 30 and 60 min after injection. Sufentanil appeared rapidly in lumbar CSF, reaching a maximum concentration (Cmax) of 57 ng/mL at 6.5 min. In cisternal CSF, a Cmax of 1.2 ng/mL was reached at 21 min, and Cmax in plasma was 0.35 ng/mL at 6 min. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of sufentanil in cisternal CSF was approximately six times higher than the plasma AUC (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative study of postoperative analgesia with methadone and fentanyl in continuous peridural perfusion

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl, which is more liposoluble than methadone, provides a similar level of analgesia with fewer side effects than methadone administered by the same route for postoperative pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective double blind study of 40 patients, randomly assigned to two groups. Group F (n = 20) received 300 micrograms-1200 micrograms/24 h in epidural perfusion. Group M (n = 20) received 9 mg-18 mg/24 h in epidural perfusion. In both cases treatment was for pain in the first 72 h after abdominal surgery. Analgesia quality was evaluated on a visual analog (VAS) scale from 1 to 10 at rest and moving. Need for complementary analgesia was also recorded, as were side effects related to the technique. RESULTS: Quality of analgesia was good and similar which both drugs. Postoperative pain did not surpass 3 on the VAS at rest or 4.5 while moving, although group F patients' need for complementary analgesia was significantly greater (p < 0.05). The incidence of hypoxemia was greater in group M than in group F (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl provides good analgesia and is associated with less hypoxemia than is methadone.