General practitioners' opinions of continence care training

AIMS: To examine general practitioners' confidence in the diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence, to define their unmet continence training and educational needs, and to evaluate the current provision of continence care in general practice, including the role of practice nurses. METHODS: A pre-tested postal questionnaire was sent to 600 general practitioners throughout New Zealand to obtain information about their demography and training in incontinence management, their confidence in diagnosis and treatment, and their perceptions of met and unmet educational needs in continence care. They were also asked about current provision of continence promotion in their practice and their views on the role of practice nurses in caring for incontinent patients. Confidence data were recorded on five point scales and analysed using chi square tests. Cluster analysis was used to describe groups with different opinions on practice nurses' roles. RESULTS: The response rate from eligible contacts was 81.3%. Although most respondents provide continence care, only 2.6% offered special clinics for continence promotion. Fewer than half felt confident to diagnose the causes of incontinence. Confidence in managing incontinence in children was consistently lower than for other incontinence presentations. There was no difference by sex in confidence in caring for incontinent patients although female respondents were more likely to consider management of continence care part of a practice nurse's role (chi 2 = 47.5, p < 0.01) and to routinely ask well women about incontinence (chi 2 = 243.6, p < 0.01). Most respondents (71.9%) could not remember having had any formal training in the management of incontinence at either undergraduate or postgraduate level. Recall of postgraduate education was associated with greater levels of confidence in management of continence problems. There was general agreement that it was appropriate to include training in continence management in vocational and continuing medical education. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of general practitioners perceive a lack of adequate medical training in incontinence care at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. There is a need for improved education for both general practitioners and practice nurses.     

Acute gastroenteritis diagnostic practices of New Zealand general practitioners

AIMS: A sample of New Zealand general practitioners was surveyed to determine the laboratory referral practices of general practitioners for patients with acute gastroenteritis, with particular reference to viral gastroenteritis. METHODS: A mail questionnaire was sent to 209 general practitioners throughout New Zealand. RESULTS: The most important criteria for laboratory referral of a diarrhoeal specimen were prolonged duration of illness, presence of blood in the stool, a recent history of overseas travel, tramping or camping, shellfish consumption, or if the patient worked in the food, child care, or health care industries. Most general practitioners reported that they would refer diarrhoeal specimens from less than 25% of their patients with acute gastroenteritis. Requests for testing for viruses other than rotavirus were rare. CONCLUSION: The viral agents causing acute gastroenteritis were less likely to receive laboratory confirmation than other causes of gastroenteritis. On the basis of current laboratory investigation practices of general practitioners, foodborne viral gastroenteritis outbreaks are unlikely to be identified as such in New Zealand.     

Management of somatisers in primary care: are family doctors motivated?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to assess the attitudes of Spanish general practitioners towards somatisers and the degree of involvement that family doctors are ready to adopt in the care of these patients. METHOD: A postal questionnaire on attitudes was sent to a representative sample (n = 135) of general practitioners from two health districts of the region of Aragon. Seventy (51.8%) of them returned usable questionnaires. RESULTS: Most of the general practitioners were interested in the treatment of somatisers and considered that they should be treated at primary care level. However, when specific treatment tasks were proposed, they only accepted to act as a filter to specialised care and to care for patients with chronic functional syndromes. Additionally, they refuse to detect presenting somatisers, to prescribe psychotropic drugs or offer any psychological approach, and to avoid reinforcing abnormal illness behaviour in these patients and their families. These findings can be explained because the main emotions somatisers produce in doctors are frustration and anger. CONCLUSIONS: Family doctors need a lot more help, education and support in the management of somatisers, and psychiatrists need to provide it. Any management program for the treatment of somatisers in primary care should include methods to modify general practitioners' attitudes towards these patients.     

General practitioners' attendance at courses accredited for the postgraduate education allowance

An analysis was undertaken in the northern half of the South Western Regional Health Authority of general practitioners' attendance at courses accredited for the postgraduate educational allowance over one year. A total of 358 courses provided 2341 hours of accredited education and produced a total general practitioner attendance of 50,389 hours. The mean attendance per principal in the area was 49.2 hours although the region may be a net importer of attenders from outside the area. Of the 50,389 total hours of attendance, 28.3% were in health promotion, 48.2% in disease management and 23.5% in service management. Course provision and attendance varied considerably over the year. September, October and November accounted for 42.7% of the total hours of attendance, compared with 6.8% in June, July and August. Courses of two to four days or of one week duration accounted for 48.3% of total attendance hours; 10.1% of total attendance hours were at commercially organized courses and 5.6% at courses organized by practices. A total of 66.1% of attendance hours were in postgraduate centres and 6.8% in the practice. Courses with more than 30 participants accounted for 15.9% of courses attended. A total of 174 general practitioners and others organized courses, 21 of them influencing 33,521 hours of general practitioner education. The study shows that in this area, there was an encouraging provision, range and uptake of continuing education courses for general practitioners. The concentration of educational activities in postgraduate centres underlines the need for increased provision for developing educational skills for clinical tutors.     

General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To compare general practitioners' reported management of acute back pain with 'evidence based' guidelines for its management. DESIGN: Confidential postal questionnaire. SETTING: One health district in the South and West region. SUBJECTS: 236 general practitioners; 166 (70%) responded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Examination routinely performed, 'danger' symptoms and signs warranting urgent referral, advice given, and satisfaction with management. RESULTS: A minority of general practitioners do not examine reflexes routinely (27%, 95% confidence interval 20% to 34%), and a majority do not examine routinely for muscle weakness or sensation. Although most would refer patients with danger signs, some would not seek urgent advice for saddle anaesthesia (6%, 3% to 11%), extensor plantar response (45%, 37% to 53%), or neurological signs at multiple levels (15%, 10% to 21%). A minority do not give advice about back exercises (42%, 34% to 49%), fitness (34%, 26% to 41%), or everyday activities. A minority performed manipulation (20%) or acupuncture (6%). One third rated their satisfaction with management of back pain as 4 out of 10 or less. CONCLUSIONS: The management of back pain by general practitioners does not match the guidelines, but there is little evidence from general practice for many of the recommendations, including routine examination, activity modification, educational advice, and back exercises. General practitioners need to be more aware of danger symptoms and of the benefits of early mobilisation and possibly of manipulation for persisting symptoms. Guidelines should reference each recommendation and discuss study methodology and the setting of evidence.     

Diagnosis and treatment of affective disorders

The rates of major depression (5-12%) are considerably higher than for bipolar disorder (ca. 1%). Depressive disorder is most frequent in general practice. Although general practitioners recognise and manage efficiently a large number of depressed patients, at any consultation about half the patients are not diagnosed. Recognising depression is made difficult by the frequency in general practice of presentations with somatic symptoms (masked depression) and of depression related to physical disorder. The best method for the general practitioner to overcome these problems is by using a relatively direct interview for the main specific symptoms of depression. The general practitioner has a key role in the management of depression and as a gatekeeper with a prime responsibility to make appropriate referrals to specialists. Counselling members of the family or friends and recommending self-help groups are important to improve the therapeutic compliance of the patients.     

General practitioners and smoking. General practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and smoking habits and the relationship between these assessed by a questionnaire study in the county of Aarhus

The objects of the investigation were to investigate the smoking habits of general practitioners, their assessment of tobacco as a risk factor for ischaemic cardiac disease, attitudes to intervention to stop smoking and to assess whether there was a connection between these. The project was carried out as a questionnaire investigation in the County of Aarhus, where all of the general practitioners received questionnaires. A total of 313 general practitioners replied to the questionnaire which corresponds to 84% participation. 33% of the general practitioners smoked and nine were chain smokers. The majority of the general practitioners accepted that smoking was a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease and were prepared to make great efforts to combat smoking. A connection was present between smoking habits and attitudes: Non-smokers considered that smoking was of great significance as a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease and were prepared to make efforts to alter the smoking habits of their patients. General practitioners doubted the effect of their advice about stopping smoking.     

Identification of acute-phase proteins (APP) in circulating immune complexes (CIC) in esophageal cancer patients'' sera

OBJECTIVES: We describe the attitude and views of general practitioners towards the menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia. METHODS: A total of 216 general practitioners were nominated by a random sample of urband-welling women aged 45-54 years who formed the Brisbane Women's health study. A 20-30 minute face-to-face questionnaire with the general practitioners was administered and analysed by demographic characteristics. RESULTS: There was a 93% response rate. Management of the menopause and HRT was routinely undertaken by general practitioners for their own patients. After deciding to initiate HRT, > 60% of general practitioners ordered five investigations or more. They may have confused the risk of thrombo-embolism from oestrogens used in the post-menopause with that for contraception. There were differences between male and female practitioners in some areas. Male general practitioners, in particular, reported more difficulty with tailoring and adjusting regimes. CONCLUSIONS: Specific areas for further education are explored to meet the educational needs of general practitioners.     

General practitioners'' attitudes to psychiatric and medical illness

BACKGROUND: General practitioners are increasingly involved in the care of patients with long-term psychiatric disorders. We have previously reported that general practitioners are less willing to treat patients with schizophrenia than those without such a diagnosis, but this may have been attributable to a reluctance to treat patients with any psychiatric or chronic illness. We, therefore, examined general practitioners' attitudes to patients with chronic psychiatric or medical illnesses. METHODS: A random sample of 260 local general practitioners were each sent one of our case vignettes which were identical apart from mention of a previous diagnosis of schizophrenia, depression, diabetes or no illness. The general practitioners were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 13 attitudinal statements based on the vignette. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six (66%) of the general practitioners responded to the case vignettes. Those responding to the vignette about the patient with schizophrenia were less happy to have that patient on their practice list and were more concerned about the risk of violence and the child's welfare. Those responding to the depression vignette were more likely to offer the patient antidepressants or counselling; and those who replied to the diabetes case were most likely to refer the patient to a hospital specialist. These differences were not attributable to the personal or practice characteristics of the general practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia arouse concerns in general practitioners that are not simply due to those patients suffering from a psychiatric or chronic illness. Our results suggest that some patients with schizophrenia may find it difficult to register with a general practitioner and receive the integrated community-based health care service they require. Psychiatrists should provide education and support to general practitioners who look after patients with schizophrenia.     

Is histological examination of tissue removed by general practitioners always necessary? Before and after comparison of detection rates of serious skin lesions

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether histological examination of all tissue removed by general practitioners in minor surgery increases the rate of detection of clinically important skin lesions, and to assess the impact of such a policy on pathologists' workload. DESIGN: Before and after comparison. SETTING: Stratified random sample of 257 general practitioner partnerships from the catchment areas of 19 English pathology laboratories. SUBJECTS: Tissue removed in minor surgery by general practitioners during the control period (September 1992 to February 1993) and intervention period (September 1993 to February 1994). INTERVENTION: General practitioners referred to their local pathology laboratory all solid tissue removed in all minor surgery, irrespective of their previous policy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of specimens referred for histology by general practitioners during intervention and control periods; numbers of primary malignant melanomas, non-melanoma malignancies, premalignant lesions, and benign lesions. RESULTS: 257/330 partnerships participated (response rate 78%). During the intervention period 5723 specimens were sent, compared with 4430 during the control period. The referral rate increased by an estimated 1.34 specimens per 1000 patient years (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.76, P < 0.0001). General practitioners sent 204 specimens that were malignant (including 16 malignant melanomas) in the control period and 188 that were malignant (including 15 malignant melanomas) during the intervention period (change in total number of malignancies, -1.0 per 100,000 patient years (-5.9 to 3.8, non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was associated with a substantial increase in laboratory workload, all of which was accounted for by increases in non-serious lesions. This observation should be taken into account when considering the merits of a policy requiring histological examination in every case.     

Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management

OBJECTIVES: To study the incidence and management of intrinsic shoulder disorders in Dutch general practice, and to evaluate which patient characteristics are associated with specific diagnostic categories. METHODS: In 11 general practices (35,150 registered patients) all consultations concerning shoulder complaints were registered during a period of one year. Patients with an intrinsic shoulder disorder who had not consulted their general practitioner for the complaint during the preceding year (incident cases) were asked to participate in an observational study. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding the nature and severity of their complaints. The general practitioners recorded data on diagnosis and therapy. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of shoulder complaints in general practice was estimated to be 11.2/1000 patients/year (95% confidence limits 10.1 to 12.3). Rotator cuff tendinitis was the most frequently recorded disorder (29%). There were 349 incident cases enrolled in the observational study. Patient characteristics showed small variations between different diagnostic categories. Age, duration of symptoms, precipitating cause and restriction of movement seemed to be discriminating factors. Twenty two percent of all participants received injections during the first consultation; most (85%) were diagnosed as having bursitis. The majority of patients with tendinitis (53%) were referred for physiotherapy. CONCLUSION: With respect to diagnosis and treatment, the practitioners generally appeared to follow the guidelines issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. Although the patient characteristics of specific disorders showed some similarities with the clinical pictures described in the literature, further research is required to demonstrate whether the proposed syndromes indeed constitute separate disorders with a different underlying pathology, requiring different treatment strategies.     

Frequency of patients' consulting in general practice and workload generated by frequent attenders: comparisons between practices

BACKGROUND: Patients who attend frequently may present a problem for general practitioners (GPs) in several ways. The frequency of patients' consulting, comparisons between practices, and the effect of frequent consulting on the clinical workload have not been quantified previously. AIMS: To examine the distribution of the number of consultations per patient in four general practices. To estimate the clinical workload generated by frequent attenders. To model the data to demonstrate the contribution of age, sex, and practice on the likelihood of attending frequently. METHOD: Analysis and modelling of a validated data set of date records of consultations collected routinely over a 41-month period from four practices in and around Leeds, representing 44,146 patients and 470,712 consultations. RESULTS: A minority of patients consulted with extreme frequency. All practices had similar distributions but varied with respect to the numbers of frequent attenders, and the frequencies of their consulting. The most frequent 1% of attenders accounted for 6% of all consultations, and the most frequent 3% for 15% of all consultations. Females and older people were more likely to be frequent attenders. CONCLUSION: Frequent attenders have an important effect on GPs clinical workload. Between one in six and one in seven consultations are with the top 3% of attenders. Further research is needed to explain the behaviour underpinning frequent attendance in order to identify appropriate management strategies; such strategies could have an important effect on clinical workload.     

Incentives for general practitioners to provide brief interventions for alcohol problems

AIMS: To assess current practices and attitudes of general practitioners towards prevention and intervention with problem drinkers. METHODS: GPs randomly selected in the Central and Southern Health Regions answered a 134 item questionnaire on their involvement with patients with alcohol related problems. RESULTS: In all, 136 general practitioners responded representing 85% of those approached. When asked how often they provided interventions with alcohol problems, 86% reported managing under 13 patients per year, indicating an intervention rate of less than 1% of the mean practice size. In terms of disease prevention, 86% rated 'drinking moderately' as important but this endorsement ranked fifth behind other lifestyle behaviours such as 'not smoking' at 99%. When asked about their perceived role, they indicated higher role legitimacy but lower work satisfaction with alcohol problems. In terms of training, three-quarters stated they had received less than eleven hours of postgraduate alcohol education. They also rated their current effectiveness with alcohol problems as substantially less than potential effectiveness. They indicated the main obstacles to be: government funding policies, lack of adequate training and a need for improved resources and support services. CONCLUSIONS: With research having established the effectiveness of interventions for harmful alcohol consumption, attention has shifted to ways of engaging general practitioners in providing interventions. This study highlighted how changes to government health policy and improved competency and skilled based training could lead to a greater acceptance by general practitioners of the role they could play in reducing alcohol related problems.     

Decision making by general practitioners in diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in women

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing decision making by general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women. SETTING: Two suburban London general practices. SUBJECTS: Women presenting to their family doctor with lower urinary tract symptoms. DESIGN: After each consultation the doctor completed a questionnaire on presenting symptoms; clinical examination; investigations undertaken; presence of psychological, social, and menstrual problems; patients' requests for antibiotics; antibiotic prescribing; knowledge of the patient; attitude towards the consultation; and any other factors assisting in diagnosis and management. Finally, doctors predicted the presence or absence of clinically important bacteriuria. Each woman completed a demographic questionnaire, the 12 item general health questionnaire, and the modified menstrual distress questionnaire, after which each provided a clean catch midstream urine sample. Case notes were examined for information on previous reports of results of urine analysis. RESULTS: When the general practitioners did not know the patients well they were 4.5 times more likely to assume that there was a clinically important infection. When they knew the patient well, they were four times more likely to make a correct prediction of the test result and 12 times less likely to prescribe antibiotics. Doctors were five times more likely to predict the test result correctly in patients from social classes 1 and 2 and were six times more likely to prescribe antibiotics for the older women in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: In women presenting with urinary tract symptoms, these family practitioners seemed to take no particular regard of physical, psychological, or menstrual factors in making their assessments. They were most accurate in their prediction of the result of urine analysis and least likely to prescribe antibiotics when they had a good general knowledge of the patient. Which came first, the diagnosis or prescribing, is difficult to say and probably differed in individual cases. Doctors tended to be more conservative in their management of older women and those whom they knew less well.     

Chronic debilitating fatigue in Irish general practice: a survey of general practitioners' experience

BACKGROUND: Doctors are called upon to treat chronic debilitating fatigue without the help of a protocol of care. AIMS: To estimate the incidence of chronic debilitating fatigue in Irish general practice, to obtain information on management strategy and outcome, to explore the attitudes of practitioners (GPs) towards the concept of a chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and to recruit practitioners to a prospective study of chronic fatigue in primary care. METHOD: A total of 200 names were selected from the database of the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP); 164 of these were eligible for the study. RESULTS: Altogether, 118 questionnaires were returned (72%). Ninety-two (78%) responders identified cases of chronic fatigue, giving an estimated 2.1 cases per practice and an incidence of 1 per 1000 population. All social classes were represented, with a male to female ratio of 1:2. Eleven disparate approaches to treatment were advocated. Many (38%) were dissatisfied with the quality of care delivered, and 45% seldom or hardly ever referred cases for specialist opinion. The majority (58%) accepted CFS as a distinct entity, 34% were undecided, and 8% rejected it. Forty-two (35%) GPs volunteered for a prospective study. CONCLUSION: Chronic fatigue is found in Irish general practice among patients of both sexes and all social classes. Doctors differ considerably in their management of patients and are dissatisfied with the quality of care they deliver. Many cases are not referred for specialist opinion. A prospective database is required to accurately assess the scale of this public health problem and to develop a protocol of care.     

The general practitioner's role in breast cancer screening: a survey in Otago-Southland

AIMS: To study the experience of general practitioners in Otago and Southland with the existing breast cancer screening programme and the reviews on future programmes. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 210 general practitioners in Otago and Southland in June 1996. RESULTS: The response rate was 71%. All the 141 respondents except one encouraged eligible women to take part in the programme; this was done mainly during individual doctor-patient consultations, by pamphlets and posters, and in the work of the practice nurse. Ten percent of practitioners had a practice-based recall system for breast cancer screening. Seventy-five percent of general practitioners currently provide a list of eligible women to the programme, and of these, 52% check the list to exclude ineligible women. Only 24% of practitioners supplying a patient list to the programme reported that a patient had ever requested that their name be excluded from the list. Twenty-five percent of general practitioners providing lists had a notice in the waiting room stating that. Of those who did not provide lists, concerns about logistics, ethical issues and cost were raised, although 40% of these general practitioners intended to provide lists in the future. In a future programme, 57% of general practitioners felt they should be paid for supplying lists defined by age only and 82% felt they should be paid for supplying a list of women eligible by both age and medical history. Most general practitioners felt that general practitioner lists were the preferred source for invitations to the breast screening programme and that general practitioners had an important part in any future programme. Screening at the ages 50-64 (as currently proposed) is supported by 95% of general practitioners; in addition, 64% supported screening at ages 65-69. Only a minority of general practitioners supported screening at ages 40-49 or ages 70-74. Most general practitioners would offer screening to women under age 50 with either a strong or a weak family history, or even with a past history of a fibroadenoma. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that almost all general practitioners support breast cancer screening programmes and feel that they have an important role in future programmes. The majority support extension of the programme to ages 65-69, but not to ages 40-49. The majority support screening women with individual risk factors at ages under 50, although their responses show that better information on the importance of different risk factors is required.