Estimating global production and supply costs for green hydrogen and hydrogen-based green energy commodities

Green energy commodities are expected to be central in decarbonising the global energy system. Such green energy commodities could be hydrogen or other hydrogen-based energy commodities produced from renewable energy sources (RES) such as solar or wind energy. We quantify the production cost and potentials of hydrogen and hydrogen-based energy commodities ammonia, methane, methanol, gasoline, diesel and kerosene in 113 countries. Moreover, we evaluate total supply costs to Germany, considering both pipeline-based and maritime transport. We determine production costs by optimising the investment and operation of commodity production from dedicated RES based on country-level RES potentials and country-specific weighted average costs of capital. Analysing the geographic distribution of production and supply costs, we find that production costs dominate the supply cost composition for liquid or easily liquefiable commodities, while transport costs dominate for gaseous commodities. In the case of Germany, importing green ammonia could be more cost-efficient than domestic production from locally produced or imported hydrogen. Green ammonia could be supplied to Germany from many regions worldwide at below the cost of domestic production, with costs ranging from 624 to 874 $/t NH₃ and Norway being the cheapest supplier. Ammonia production using imported hydrogen from Spain could be cost-effective if a pan-European hydrogen pipeline grid based on repurposed natural gas pipelines exists.     

加氢站流程和配置技术现状与展望

加氢站（HRS）是氢能高效利用的重要环节,是促进燃料电池汽车行业发展的重要基础设施。本文介绍了外供氢加氢站一般系统流程及配置方法;整理了国内外关于系统流程的优化措施,其中包括常规系统的部件（如长管拖车、站侧储罐配置及预冷系统）的配置优化,以及非常规部件的新型系统（如喷射器、涡流管或膨胀机）的集成;最后对未来优化方向进行了展望。     

Impact of hydrogen refueling configurations and market parameters on the refueling cost of hydrogen

The cost of hydrogen in early fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) markets is dominated by the cost of refueling stations, mainly due to the high cost of refueling equipment, small station capacities, lack of economies of scale, and low utilization of the installed refueling capacity. Using the hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model (HDSAM), this study estimates the impacts of these factors on the refueling cost for different refueling technologies and configurations, and quantifies the potential reduction in future hydrogen refueling cost compared to today's cost in the United States. The current hydrogen refueling station levelized cost, for a 200 kg/day dispensing capacity, is in the range of $6–$8/kg H₂ when supplied with gaseous hydrogen, and $8–$9/kg H₂ for stations supplied with liquid hydrogen. After adding the cost of hydrogen production, packaging, and transportation to the station's levelized cost, the current cost of hydrogen at dispensers for FCEVs in California is in the range of $13–$15/kg H₂. The refueling station capacity utilization strongly influences the hydrogen refueling cost. The underutilization of station capacity in early FCEV markets, such as in California, results in a levelized station cost that is approximately 40% higher than it would be in a scenario where the station had been fully utilized since it began operating. In future mature hydrogen FCEV markets, with a large demand for hydrogen, the refueling station's levelized cost can be reduced to $2/kg H₂ as a result of improved capacity utilization and reduced equipment cost via learning and economies of scale.     

Two-tier pressure consolidation operation method for hydrogen refueling station cost reduction

An operation strategy known as two-tier “pressure consolidation” of delivered tube-trailers (or equivalent supply storage) has been developed to maximize the throughput at gaseous hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). The high capital costs of HRSs and the consequent high investment risk are deterring growth of the infrastructure needed to promote the deployment of FCEVs. Stations supplied by gaseous hydrogen will be necessary for FCEV deployment in both the near and long term. The two-tier pressure consolidation method enhances gaseous HRSs in the following ways: (1) reduces the capital cost compared with conventional stations, as well as those operating according to the original pressure consolidation approach described by Elgowainy et al. (2014) [1], (2) minimizes pressure cycling of HRS supply storage relative to the original pressure consolidation approach; and (3) increases use of the station's supply storage (or delivered tube-trailers) while maintaining higher state-of-charge vehicle fills.     

Vehicle refueling with liquid hydrogen thermal compression

We have modeled an approach for dispensing pressurized hydrogen to 350 and/or 700 bar vehicle vessels. Instead of relying on compressors, this concept stores liquid hydrogen in cryogenic pressure vessels where pressurization occurs through heat transfer, reducing the station energy footprint from 12 kW h/kgH₂ of energy from the US grid mix to 1.5–2 kW h/kgH₂ of heating. This thermal compression station presents capital cost and reliability advantages by avoiding the expense and maintenance of high-pressure hydrogen compressors, at the detriment of some evaporative losses. The total installed capital cost for a 475 kg/day thermal compression hydrogen refueling station is estimated at about $611,500, an almost 60% cost reduction over today's refueling station cost. The cost for 700 bar dispensing is $5.23/kg H₂ for a conventional station vs. $5.45/kg H₂ for a thermal compression station. If there is a demand for 350 bar H₂ in addition to 700 bar dispensing, the cost of dispensing from a thermal compression station drops to $4.81/kg H₂, which is similar to the cost of a conventional station that dispenses 350 bar H₂ only. Thermal compression also offers capacity flexibility (wide range of pressure, temperature, and station demand) that makes it appealing for early market applications.     

Green hydrogen production potential for developing a hydrogen economy in Pakistan

Pakistan's energy crisis can be diminished through the use of Renewable and alternative sources of energy. Hydrogen as an energy vector is likely to replace the fossil fuels in the future owing to the political, financial and environmental factors associated with the latter. In this regard it is imperative that conscious effort is directed towards the production of hydrogen from Renewable resources. Renewable energy resources are abundantly available in Pakistan. The need to produce Hydrogen from Renewable resources in Pakistan (or any developing economy) is investigated because it is possible to store vast amount of intermittent renewable energy for later use. Thus the introduction of Hydrogen in the energy supply chain implies the start of a Pakistan Hydrogen Economy. Many nations have developed the Hydrogen Energy Roadmap, and if Pakistan has to follow suite it is only possible through the employment of Renewable energy resources. This study estimates the potential of different Renewable resources available in Pakistan i.e. Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Biomass and Municipal Solid waste. An estimate is then made for the potential of producing hydrogen from various established technologies from each of these Renewable resources. A number of reviews have been published stating the availability and usage of Renewable energy in Pakistan; however no specific study has been focused on the use of Renewable resources for developing a Hydrogen economy or a power-to-gas system in Pakistan. This study concludes that that Biomass is the most feasible feedstock for developing a Hydrogen supply chain in Pakistan with a potential to generate 6.6 million tons of Hydrogen annually, followed by Solar PV that has a generation potential of 2.8 million tons and then Municipal solid waste with a capacity of 1 million ton per annum.