Ultraviolet (UV) transmittance characteristics of daily disposable and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

The ultraviolet (UV) transmittance spectra of daily wear hydrogel and disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses were measured. Average transmittance percentages were calculated for each lens for the entire UV spectrum and individually for the UVC, UVB and UVA portions of the spectrum. The significance of the differences in transmittance spectra obtained for the lenses was analysed using a one-way ANOVA planned comparisons test (alpha=0.05). The transmittance data were then used to calculate a UV protection factor (PF) for each contact lens brand tested. The PFs for 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST (6.22), ACUVUE ADVANCE (10.02) and ACUVUE OASYS (11.96) contact lenses show that these contact lenses have superior UV-blocking capabilities. The PFs for Focus DAILIES (1.79), SofLens 1-day disposables (1.72), NIGHT & DAY (1.84), O2 Optix (1.99) and Purevision (2.62) show that these contact lenses posses more modest UV-blocking characteristics. This paper reviews the importance of protection of the anterior ocular surface from UV damage and quantifies the protection afforded by selected commercially available disposable contact lenses.     

Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of spherical aberration (SA) correction with aspheric contact lenses (aspheric lenses) based on lens power, and compare the results with those of spherical contact lenses (spherical lenses).MethodsOcular higher-order aberrations were measured with a wavefront sensor, in 11 myopic subjects wearing an aspheric lens (Medalist Fresh fit (PUREVISION 2 HD); Bausch + Lomb) or a spherical lens (ACUVUE Oasys; Johnson & Johnson). Six different lens powers (−7.00 diopters (D), −5.00 D, −3.00 D, −1.00 D, +1.00 D, +3.00 D) were used for all subjects. The amount of SA correction from the contact lens at each power was calculated as the difference between SA with the contact lens on-eye and SA of the eye alone.ResultsFor the spherical lenses, SA correction was close to 0.00 μm for the +1.00 D lens, became more positive as the labeled lens power increased and became more negative as the labeled lens power decreased. For the aspheric lenses, SA correction was consistent, from −0.15 to −0.05 μm, for all lens powers except for the −1.00 D lens. SA correction for the spherical and aspheric lenses was significantly different at −7.00 D (p = 0.040), −3.00 D (p = 0.015), −1.00 D (p < 0.001), +1.00 D (p = 0.006), and +3.00 D (p < 0.001) powers.ConclusionAn aspheric lens is capable of correcting SA at different lens powers, and has SA correction in the range of −0.15 to −0.05 μm over a 6 mm aperture.     

In vitro power profiles of multifocal simultaneous vision contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate the power profile of multifocal contact lenses (CLs) using a new technology based on quantitative deflectometry.MethodsThe Nimo TR1504 was used to analyze the power distribution of multifocal CLs. The CLs under study were: Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Low, Medium and High Addition and Focus Progressives. Three lenses of each model were considered.ResultsAll multifocal CLs showed a power profile characterized by a change toward more positive power values when aperture sizes become smaller. The near refractive addition of the lenses under study was +2.61 D, +1.44 D, +1.30 D and +0.30 D for the Focus Progressives, the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal High, Medium Add and Low Add, respectively. The refractive power of the Focus Progressives did not reach the value of the nominal distance power until a radial distance of 0.9 mm from the center of the lens. For the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Low Add the distance nominal power was reached at a radial distance of 1.5 mm from the center of the lens, whereas this occurred at a distance of 1.8 mm for the Air Optix Aqua Multifocal Medium and High Add.ConclusionThe relation between the pupil diameter of the patients and the power profile of these CLs has a crucial implication on the final distance correction and near addition that these lenses provide to patients. Practitioners should know the power profile of these CLs and measure the pupil diameter of each patient in different situations in order to carry out a customized fitting.     

Comparison of fitting stability of the different soft toric contact lenses

PurposeTo compare lens orientation and rotational recovery of five currently available soft toric lenses.MethodsTwenty subjects were recruited and trialed with each of the study lenses in a random order. Study lenses were PureVision^® Toric (B&L), Air Optix^® for Astigmatism (Alcon), Biofinity^® Toric (CooperVision), Acuvue^® Advance for Astigmatism (Vistakon), and Proclear^® Toric (CooperVision). Lens orientation in primary position to determine the lens rotation form the vertical position and rotational recovery to primary gaze orientation following a 45° manual misorientation for the different lenses was compared.ResultsThe Biofinity Toric showed the lowest rotation from the vertical position and the Proclear Toric the highest. Also, the highest and the lowest reorientation speed were related to the Biofinity Toric and the Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism, respectively. The Repeated Measures ANOVA showed a significant difference in the lens rotation (P = 0.004) and rotational recovery (P < 0.001) among different contact lenses and the performed multiple comparisons indicated differences in rotation and also in reorientation speed were only seen between the Biofinity Toric when compared to four other lenses (P < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough there was appropriate fitting, based upon lens orientation and reorientation speed, with each of the study lenses it would appear that the optimized ballast technique used in the design of the Biofinity Toric helps reduce lens rotation and improve rotational recovery compared to others.     

Trend of soft contact lens prescribing in an optometry centre in India: A 6-year analysis

This six-year retrospective longitudinal study was conducted to examine the changes in the pattern of prescribing soft contact lenses in an optometry centre located in a University in South India. Details regarding the type of lenses, lens material, wearing pattern and the clinical diagnoses were analyzed from January 2006 to December 2011. A total of 1273 soft contact lens fits (n = 1273) were analyzed. Two-third of the total lenses dispensed was for females and their mean age (24.0 ± 8.3 yrs) was less than that of male (27.0 ± 11.2 yrs) lens users. Nearly 70% of them had myopia and 48% wore conventional soft contact lenses. During the studied six years, the percentage of conventional lenses declined by 60%. This study demonstrated a gradual and significant increase in popularity of disposable contact lenses and silicone hydrogel lens material which is comparable to the global trend.     

The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma

PurposeTo investigate the accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure over a silicone hydrogel contact lens using Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes with glaucoma.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized study and enrolled 28 patients (28 right eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was taken with and without a silicone hydrogel contact lens (−0.50 D), in situ (using Goldmann applanation tonometry), in a randomized order of measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and Bland–Altman plot.ResultsThe mean difference (± standard deviation) found between intraocular pressure measurement without (mean 16.7 ± 3.2 mmHg) and with (mean 17.3 ± 3.0 mmHg) contact lens was found to be −0.57 ± 2.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval, −1.5 to 0.3). No significant statistical difference was found between the two groups with paired t-test (p = 0.19). The Bland Altman plot showed some evidence of increasing variability of differences between two measures of intraocular pressure, with increasing intraocular pressure. The 95% limits of agreement of the Bland Altman plot were unacceptably large (−5 mmHg to 3.9 mmHg).ConclusionAgreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without contact lenses seems to be poor in patients with glaucoma, especially for high intraocular pressure.     

Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens

PurposeTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with ocular response analyzer (ORA) with and without soft contact lenses (CL) on eye.MethodsGoldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured in 56 eyes of 28 subjects without any ocular pathology, using ORA. One eye was fitted with Narafilcon A (1-Day Acuvue True Eye, Johnson & Johnson) and the other eye with Nelfilcon A (Daily AquaComfort Plus, Ciba Vision), each with −3.00D and IOPg and IOPcc were again measured over CL. The variation in the IOP with and without CL was determined.ResultsOut of 28 subjects, 54% (15) were female. Mean age of the subjects was 29.4 ± 9.8 years. Both the IOPg and IOPcc when measured with CL, were found statistically significantly lower than without CL (p < 0.05). In subjects wearing Narafilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found 0.88 ± 2.04 mmHg and 1.55 ± 2.16 mmHg lower than without CL, respectively. Similarly, with Nelfilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found to be 1.03 ± 1.93 mmHg and 1.62 ± 3.12 mmHg lower, respectively. IOPcc was highly affected and underestimated by more than 3 mmHg in upto 36% of the subjects.ConclusionMeasurement of IOP over minus (−3.00D) CL with ORA is dependent upon CL properties when measured in normal IOP population. It showed lower IOP over Narafilcon A and Nelfilcon A soft CL in comparison to the pressures measured without lenses. IOPg was found less affected by CL. For the accurate measurement of IOP with ORA, CL should be removed.     

Corneal changes following short-term miniscleral contact lens wear

PurposeTo examine the influence of short-term miniscleral contact lens wear on corneal shape, thickness and anterior surface aberrations.MethodsScheimpflug imaging was captured before, immediately following and 3 h after a short period (3 h) of miniscleral contact lens wear for 10 young (mean 27 ± 5 years), healthy participants. Natural diurnal variations were considered by measuring baseline diurnal changes obtained on a separate control day without contact lens wear.ResultsSmall but significant anterior corneal flattening was observed immediately following lens removal (overall mean 0.02 ± 0.03 mm, p < 0.001) which returned to baseline levels 3 h after lens removal. During the 3 h recovery period significant corneal thinning (−13.4 ± 10.5 μm) and posterior surface flattening (0.03 ± 0.02 mm) were also observed (both p < 0.01). The magnitude of posterior corneal flattening during recovery correlated with the amount of corneal thinning (r = 0.69, p = 0.03). Central corneal clearance (maximum tear reservoir depth) was not associated with corneal swelling following lens removal (r = −0.24, p > 0.05). An increase in lower-order corneal astigmatism Z(2,2) was also observed following lens wear (mean −0.144 ± 0.075 μm, p = 0.02).ConclusionsFlattening of the anterior corneal surface was observed immediately following lens wear, while ‘rebound’ thinning and flattening of the posterior surface was evident following the recovery period. Modern miniscleral contact lenses that vault the cornea may slightly influence corneal shape and power but do not induce clinically significant corneal oedema during short-term wear.     

Evaluation of daily disposable senofilcon A contact lenses in a symptomatic population

PurposeTo evaluate the comfort performance of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? Technology among symptomatic contact lens wearers by using Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) comfort scores and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8) discomfort and dryness scores.MethodsThree clinical trials evaluated comfort and dryness when refitting symptomatic contact lens wearers to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? lenses. This analysis combined the CLUE comfort and CLDEQ-8 scores obtained at baseline and 2-week follow-up and compared average scores between visits. Subjects were grouped by habitual lens modality (daily disposable or daily wear reusable) and habitual lens material (silicone hydrogel or hydrogel). The analysis included data from 107 subjects.ResultsSignificant increases in mean CLUE comfort scores between baseline and 2–week follow-up occurred in all subject groups across habitual lens modality and material, indicating an improvement in overall comfort. CLUE comfort score improved clinically (≥5-point increase) among 75.7% of subjects (81/107). Similarly, significant decrease in mean CLDEQ-8 scores between baseline and 2-week follow-up occurred in all subject groups, indicating a decrease in the prevalence of dryness and discomfort symptoms. CLDEQ-8 score improved clinically (≥3-point reduction) among 82.2% of subjects (88/107). A majority of subjects (57.0%) became asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 11 points) after 2 weeks of bilateral wear.ConclusionRefitting symptomatic contact lens patients to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? can improve overall comfort and reduce symptoms of dryness and discomfort, irrespective of the previous lens modality or habitual lens material.     

The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations

PurposeTo investigate the differences of functional visual acuity (FVA) and high order aberrations (HOAs) in relation to tinted and clear hydrogel soft contact lens (SCL) wear.MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed in 16 eyes of 16 healthy volunteers. Dynamic visual acuity (using a FVA measurement system) and higher-order aberrations (using a wavefront sensor) were compared in subjects wearing two types of soft contact lenses: 1-day Acuvue^® (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) clear and the 1-day Acuvue^® Define^TM (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) tinted lens. The blink rates were recorded during FVA testing. The correlation between the difference of HOAs and differences in FVA values was analyzed.ResultsThe mean LogMAR FVA scores with clear and tinted SCLs were 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.14 ± 0.17 (P < 0.05). The mean blink frequencies with clear and tinted SCL wear were 18.4 ± 8.3 and 25.3 ± 4.7 blinks/min (P < 0.05). Both 3rd-order aberrations and total HOAs showed statistically significant differences between the two types of soft contact lenses for 6 mm pupil measurements (P < 0.05). A significant positive linear correlation was observed between ΔHOAs and ΔLogMAR FVA for 6 mm pupil measurements (R = 0.53, P = 0.04).ConclusionsTinted contact lens wear appears to induce a reduction in optical quality. Functional visual acuity measurement is a useful procedure to study the changes of visual performance and quality in tinted contact lens wear.     

Comparison of conventional method of contact lens fitting and software based contact lens fitting with Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with corneal scar

PurposeTo compare conventional method of contact lens fitting with software based contact lens fitting using Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with nebular and macular corneal scars.MethodsFifteen participants who were diagnosed with nebular and macular scars were fitted with rigid gas permeable lenses using conventional method of contact lens fitting. During the lens dispensing visit, participants underwent Medmont corneal topography. Agreement between the two methods of contact lens fitting was studied.ResultsParameters of contact lenses which were concluded using conventional method was compared to that of software based fitting. Mean difference in base curve of contact lens between the two methods was 0.094 mm ± 0.147 mm (95% CI: +0.383 to −0.194). Mean difference in diameter of contact lens between the two methods was 0.16 mm ± 0.172 mm (95% CI: +0.497 to −0.177). Contact lens parameters that were achieved using two different methods of fitting showed good correlation. Correlation coefficients, as comparison of two methods in base curve and diameter were 0.96 (P < 0.05) and 0.94 (P < 0.05), respectively.ConclusionSoftware based contact lens fitting would be useful for contact lens practitioners to predict initial base curve of contact lens in corneal scars.     

Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regularity in subjects with keratoconus.MethodsNineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of −3.00, −1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00 D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8 mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated.ResultsNegative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p > 0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p < 0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00 D lenses (p = 0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p > 0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8 mm diameter for all lens powers (p < 0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p > 0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p < 0.05).ConclusionNegative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.     

An acute clinical comparison of corneal staining and comfort associated with contact lens care solutions

PurposeThis study compared the biocompatibility and comfort of 4 lens care solutions currently marketed in France.MethodsThis was a randomized, interventional, double-masked, single-center crossover study assessing balafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses, bilaterally, straight from the blister pack solution (control) and pre-soaked in the following lens care solutions: Regard^® (containing sodium chlorite), ReNu^® (containing a PHMB [polyhexamethylene biguanide] derivative), CyClean™ and MeniCare™ Soft (both containing PHMB). Subjects were randomized to the order of test solution use. For each of the 5 solutions tested, subjects attended a baseline/lens dispensing visit and an intervention visit 2 h later. At both visits, evaluation included slit-lamp examination, corrected-distance visual acuity, corneal staining, and subject-assessed photophobia, ocular comfort, and ocular redness.ResultsThirty subjects were enrolled and 28 were evaluable. Corneal staining severity was significantly worse than baseline after 2 h of wearing lenses soaked in CyClean, MeniCare, or ReNu (P ≤ 0.001). The MeniCare group alone demonstrated a significant improvement in ocular comfort after 2 h of lens wear (P = 0.02). No group demonstrated significant changes in ocular redness or photophobia. Corrected-distance visual acuity was similar between baseline and intervention visits for each test solution. No adverse events were reported during the study.ConclusionsSilicone hydrogel contact lenses presoaked in lens solutions containing PHMB or a PHMB derivative produced an increase in corneal staining after 2 h of lens wear. The higher levels of corneal staining in the 2 solutions did not correlate with increased discomfort within this 2-h timeframe.     

Preparation,characterization and antimicrobial study of a hydrogel (soft contact lens) material impregnated with silver nanoparticles

PurposeContact lenses that incorporate antimicrobial properties may reduce the risk for microbial-associated adverse events for lens wearers. The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles (NP) when impregnated in a hydrogel material.MethodsHydrogel disks, used as a proxy for soft contact lenses, were prepared with silver NPs to add an antimicrobial effect to the polymer. Six groups of disks were created, each with a different concentration of silver NPs. The antimicrobial effect of the hydrogels against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC15442) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC6538) was evaluated at 6, 24, 48 and 72 h.ResultsSilver NP concentrations ranged from 20.71 to 98.06 μg/disk. All groups demonstrated excellent antibacterial effects against P. aeruginosa at each time point. After 6 h all disks didn’t exhibit desirable antibacterial activity against S. aureus; whereas except those with 20.71 μg silver NPs showed antibacterial activity at 24 h and only the disks with 57.13 and 98.06 μg silver NPs showed antimicrobial activity at 48 and 72 h.ConclusionsThe development of contact lenses made of a silver NP-impregnated hydrogel material may bring antimicrobial effects sufficient to decrease the risk of microbial-related adverse events for lens wearers.     

Contact lens prescribing pattern in India—2011

PurposeTo understand the pattern of prescribing contact lenses (CL) among Indian practitioners.MethodsSurvey forms were sent to 257 practitioners across the country to collect information about their last 10 CL fits, location and type of practice, years of experience and educational qualification. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any association of various factors to the lens fitting pattern and chi-square test was used to compare proportions. The data were analyzed using SPSS v.16.ResultsCL fitting details from 227 practitioners were acquired representing a total of 2270 fits. The mean age of patients was 26.8 ± 7.4 years and 67% of them were females. Ninety-eight percent of patients wore soft CL comprising 24% toric lenses. Ninety percent patients preferred disposable modality with 65% of these opting for monthly disposable lenses. Twenty-eight percent of the lenses dispensed were silicone hydrogel (SiH) lenses. Optometry practices located in metropolitan cities dispensed significantly higher numbers of disposable (p < 0.001) and SiH lenses (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed Fellowship of International Association of Contact Lens Educators (FIACLE) (OR: 13.79, 95% CI: 2.61–72.70), post graduate degree (OR: 3.87, 95% CI: 0.87–17.12) and years of experience were directly associated with fitting of advanced CL.ConclusionThe CL prescribing patterns in India elicited from this survey suggest the dominance (90%) of prescribing of disposable soft CL. Higher level of education, greater experience and a FIACLE status were significantly associated with advanced fitting.     

Bitoric rigid gas permeable contact lenses in the optical management of penetrating keratoplasty

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the complexity and effectiveness of fitting bitoric rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCLs), compared to spherical RGPCLS, when used in the correction of high amounts of post-penetrating keratoplasty astigmatism.MethodsRecords of post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) patients being managed with bitoric RGPCLs were compared to controls (post-PKP patients managed with spherical RGPCLs). Factors that were analyzed included the number of diagnostic RGPCLs used to assess the initial fit, the number of RGPCLs ordered to finalize the fit and the number of total doctor visits to finalize the fit.ResultsFourteen eyes of 14 patients satisfied the study criteria. The average amount of total astigmatism in this study group was 10.0 D ± 5.0 compared to the control group which was 3.3 D ± 2.6. The number of diagnostic RGPCLs used for the study group was 1.2 ± 0.4 compared to 1.0 ± 0.0 for the control group. The mean number of contact lenses ordered to complete the fitting for the study group was 1.9 ± 0.7 compared to the control which was 2.1 ± 0.8. The study group presented for an average of 6.3 ± 1.6 visits whereas the control group presented for 4.9 ± 1.1 visits. Contact lens corrected acuity for the study group was 0.101 ± 0.11 (20/25) compared to the control group 0.08 ± 0.12 (20/24).ConclusionsThe complexity of fitting bitoric RGPCLs was found to be similar to fitting spherical RGPCLs on post-PKP eyes and the visual outcomes were not different.     

Corneal changes following short-term rigid contact lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this cross-over study was to investigate the changes in corneal thickness, anterior and posterior corneal topography, corneal refractive power and ocular wavefront aberrations, following the short term use of rigid contact lenses.MethodFourteen participants wore 4 different types of contact lenses (RGP lenses of 9.5 mm and 10.5 mm diameter, and for comparison a PMMA lens of 9.5 mm diameter and a soft silicone hydrogel lens) on 4 different days for a period of 8 h on each day. Measures were collected before and after contact lens wear and additionally on a baseline day.ResultsAnterior corneal curvature generally showed a flattening with both of the RGP lenses and a steepening with the PMMA lens. A significant negative correlation was found between the change in corneal swelling and central and peripheral posterior corneal curvature (all p ≤ 0.001). RGP contact lenses caused a significant decrease in corneal refractive power (hyperopic shift) of approximately 0.5 D. The PMMA contact lenses caused the greatest corneal swelling in both the central (27.92 ± 15.49 μm, p < 0.001) and peripheral (17.78 ± 12.11 μm, p = 0.001) corneal regions, a significant flattening of the posterior cornea and an increase in ocular aberrations (all p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionThe corneal swelling associated with RGP lenses was relatively minor, but there was slight central corneal flattening and a clinically significant hyperopic change in corneal refractive power after the first day of lens wear. The PMMA contact lenses resulted in significant corneal swelling and reduced optical performance of the cornea.     

Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of two silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, approved for continuous wear for one week, following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).MethodsForty seven myopic patients (94 eyes) undergone bilateral PRK were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked, comparative study. One eye of each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B lens (Ciba Vision, Duluth, US; 30-day recommended replacement) whereas the fellow eye was fitted with an Asmofilcon A lens (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan; 14-day recommended replacement). Epithelial defect size was assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy on the day of surgery and at days 1–4 post-operatively. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity and retinal straylight (C-Quant, Oculus Optigerate, Germany) were evaluated pre-operatively and one month post-operatively.ResultsAverage epithelial defect size for Asmofilcon A and Lotrafilcon B was 25.5 ± 11.0 mm² vs. 27.1 ± 9.9 mm² at day 1 (p = 0.007) and 6.3 ± 7.0 mm² vs. 9.2 ± 9.5 mm² at day 2 (p = 0.012) post-operatively. Re-epithelialization at day 3 was completed in 87.2% of the eyes fitted with Asmofilcon A lenses, compared to 74.5% with Lotrafilcon B lenses (p = 0.012). At the 3rd post-operative day 29.8% of re-epithelialized eyes showed irregular suture with Lotrafilcon B, compared to 12.8% eyes with Asmofilcon A lenses (p < 0.001). Finally, no statistically significant differences were found post-operatively between the two lenses retinal straylight (p = 0.98) and best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.68).ConclusionsSiH lenses can be used as an effective bandage after PRK due to the limited time requested for achieving complete corneal re-epithelialization. Faster and smoother epithelial healing is provided with Asmofilcon A over Lotrafilcon B lenses.     

Spectral transmittance of UV-blocking soft contact lenses: A comparative study

BackgroundThree major parts of sunlight consist of visible, ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can result in a spectrum of skin and ocular diseases. UV-blocking contact lenses help provide protection against harmful UV radiation. We studied the ultraviolet and visible light rays transmission in some soft UV-blocking contact lenses.Material and methodsFour available tinted soft lenses (Acuvue Moist, Zeiss CONTACT Day 30 Air spheric, Pretty Eyes and Sauflon 56 UV) have been evaluated for UV and visible transmission. One-way ANOVA testing was performed to establish is there a statistically significant difference between the UV regions and visible spectra means for the contact lenses (α = 0.05).ResultsPretty Eyes, Zeiss CONTACT, Acuvue Moist and Sauflon 56 UV showed UV-B transmittance value of 0.65%, 10.69%, 1.22%, and 5.78%, respectively. Pretty Eyes and Acuvue Moist had UV-A transmittance values of 32% and 34%, Sauflon 56 UV and Zeiss CONTACT had transmittance values of 48% and 43%, respectively. All of the studied lenses transmitted at least 94.6% on the visible spectrum. The results of the one-way ANOVA statistical analysis show that a statistically significant difference exists within the group of contact lenses tested for the visible (p < 0.001), UV-B (p < 0.001) and UV-A (p < 0.001) portions of the spectrum (α = 0.05).ConclusionAcuvue Moist has the best UV-blocking property and also visible transmission between other tested contact lenses in this study.     

Peripheral myopization and visual performance with experimental rigid gas permeable and soft contact lens design

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of two experimental contact lenses (CL) designed to induce relative peripheral myopic defocus in myopic eyes.MethodsTen right eyes of 10 subjects were fitted with three different CL: a soft experimental lens (ExpSCL), a rigid gas permeable experimental lens (ExpRGP) and a standard RGP lens made of the same material (StdRGP). Central and peripheral refraction was measured using a Grand Seiko open-field autorefractometer across the central 60° of the horizontal visual field. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartman-Shack aberrometer, and monocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured with a VCTS6500 without and with the three contact lenses.ResultsBoth experimental lenses were able to increase significantly the relative peripheral myopic defocus up to −0.50 D in the nasal field and −1.00 D in the temporal field (p < 0.05). The ExpRGP induced a significantly higher myopic defocus in the temporal field compared to the ExpSCL. ExpSCL induced significantly lower levels of Spherical-like HOA than ExpRGP for the 5 mm pupil size (p < 0.05). Both experimental lenses kept CSF within normal limits without any statistically significant change from baseline (p > 0.05).ConclusionsRGP lens design seems to be more effective to induce a significant myopic change in the relative peripheral refractive error. Both lenses preserve a good visual performance. The worsened optical quality observed in ExpRGP was due to an increased coma-like and spherical-like HOA. However, no impact on the visual quality as measured by CSF was observed.