Globoside expression within the human placenta

PURPOSE: To validate a computer-based area calculation method of quantification of rectal evacuation by using defecography videotapes and to use that method to compare evacuation in constipated patients with that in control subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For validation of the method, simultaneous defecography and weight measurements were compared in 36 patients with constipation or incontinence. Evacuation was calculated as the rate of change of the contrast medium-covered rectal area (percentage per second) or of the evacuated amount of contrast medium (percentage per second [relative] and grams per second [absolute]). After method validation, from a series of 215 consecutive constipated patients, individuals with an isolated radiologic diagnosis of intussusception greater than 0.6 cm (n = 27), rectocele greater than 2 cm (n = 19), enterocele (n = 12), or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction (n = 12) were selected. Rectal evacuation in these groups was compared with that in 30 control subjects. RESULTS: Rectal evacuation rates measured at defecography correlated well with weighed amounts of evacuated contrast medium during the initial and total evacuation periods in 21 patients without contrast medium leak (r = 0.92, P < .001). Constipation overall, a rectocele greater than 2 cm, or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction were associated with impaired evacuation (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Area calculations of rectal evacuation reflect rectal emptying. A rectocele greater than 2 cm or a paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction may be associated with obstructed defecation.     

Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse

PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze how often internal rectal intussusception develops into total rectal prolapse. METHODS: Repeated investigations with defecography were performed in 312 patients because of persisting symptoms. In 79 patients who had a rectal intussusception at the first defecography, results of the second defecography and the patients' records were studied. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients had not undergone any surgical treatment of rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse between the first and second defecographies. One of these patients had a rectal prolapse at the second defecography, and another developed a clinical prolapse after the second defecography. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the risk of developing a rectal prolapse in patients with rectal intussusception is small. This risk should, therefore, not be used as an indication for surgery.     

Role of radiologic diagnosis in rectal mucosal prolapse

Defecography (DG) is a useful method to detect many morpho-functional deformities of anus and rectum and pelvic floor. We report on a clinical and radiologic study of 165 patients (36 men and 129 women) suffering from defecation disorders and rectal muscosal prolapse (RMP). All the patients had been submitted to clinical examination, endoscopy and double contrast enema to rule out organic colorectal conditions. DG was performed with a dedicated conmode and high-density barium and videorecorded on VHS cassettes to assess the dynamics of evacuation phases and to reduce exposure doses. DG showed single RMP in 28% of cases and multiple RMP in 72% of cases; the condition was isolated in 22% of cases, while in 88% of cases it was associated with other anorectal dysfunctions, such as rectocele (65%), perineal descent syndrome (PDS) (15%), puborectal muscle syndrome (14%) and intussusception (8%). RMP appeared at DG as a wall defect bulging into rectal lumen, which was more evident under straining and during barium evacuation. In 12 patients with multiple RMP, dynamic CT of the pelvis was carried out to study the whole pelvic floor and in 5 cases it showed levator ani diastasis. Fifty-eight patients were submitted to surgery by elastic binding of RMP; DG follow-up showed RMP remission in 47 patients, single RMP relapse in 3 patients and multiple RMP relapse in 3 patients. One patient with PDS and intussusception was submitted to rectopexy and mucosectom.     

Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence in elderly patients

Fecal incontinence is a physically and psychologically disabling condition that affects millions of Americans, especially those over the age of 65 years. The pathophysiology is often multifactorial, with decreased anorectal sensation, reduced rectal compliance. anal sphincter dysfunction, altered stool consistency and immobility playing significant roles. A detailed history and a thorough physical examination are always necessary in patients with fecal incontinence and physiologic tests, including anorectal manometry, cinedefecography and electromyography, may be required for proper diagnosis and treatment. In most patients fecal incontinence is initially treated with conservative measures, such as biofeedback training or alteration of the stool consistency (if appropriate). If conservative management fails, surgical intervention, such as sphincteroplasty or gracilis muscle transposition, may be considered.     

Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training

Dyschezia may be caused by pelvic floor dyssynergia, which takes place when a paradoxical contraction or a failure to relax the pelvic floor muscles occurs during attempts to defecate. The aim of our study was to set up a new bimodal rehabilitation programme for pelvic floor dyssynergia, which combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback, and to evaluate the results of this treatment. Thirty-five patients (age range: 28-64 years; mean age: 42.5 years) from the outpatient unit of the Clinica Chirurgica of the University of Florence, Italy, and an age-matched group of 10 healthy control subjects (age range: 31-59 years; mean age 45.7 years) with normal bowel habits and without any defecatory disorders, were studied. The 35 patients were symptomatic for dyschezia without slow colonic transit and had been diagnosed as being affected by pelvic floor dyssynergia. No evidence of any organic aetiology was present but all demonstrated both manometric and radiological evidence of inappropriate function of the pelvic floor. All of the patients underwent bimodal rehabilitation, using the combined training programme Clinical evaluation, computerized anorectal manometry and defecography were carried out 1 week before and 1 week after a completed course in bimodal rehabilitation. The control group underwent manometric and defecographic examination. Their results were compared with those of the 35 patients before and after training. After the programme, all 35 patients had a very significant increase in stool frequency (P < 0.001), while laxative and enema-induced bowel movements had become significantly less frequent (P < 0.001). After bimodal rehabilitation, computerized anorectal manometry showed some peculiar results. Resting anal canal pressure had increased but not significantly. Pre-programme values that indicated a shorter duration ("exhaustio") of maximal voluntary contraction than found in the controls had returned to normal values. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), with incomplete relaxation, which had been shorter than that of controls, became normal by the end of the rehabilitation. All RAIR parameters were significantly different especially when pre- and post-treatment values were compared (P < 0.001). No differences were found as regards rectal sensation parameters and rectal compliance between those before or after bimodal rehabilitation. Defecographic pretreatment X-ray films showed indentation of the puborectalis and poor anorectal angle (ARA) opening, at evacuation, with trapping barium of at 50%. After pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training, the indentation had disappeared and the ARA had become significantly larger (P < 0.001) during evacuation. No differences were found after rehabilitation, when both were compared with those of controls. The pelvic floor descent was also significantly deeper (P < 0.001) than before the start of the programme. The bimodal rehabilitation technique can be considered a useful therapeutic option for functional dyschezia as shown by our clinical evaluations, manometric data and defecographic reports.     

A retrospective study of the effects of pelvic irradiation for gynecological cancer on anorectal function

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of anorectal dysfunction following therapeutic pelvic irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anorectal function was evaluated in 15 randomly selected patients (aged 47-84 years) who had received pelvic irradiation for treatment of carcinoma of the uterine body and cervix 5 and 10 years earlier. The following parameters were assessed in each patient: (a) anorectal symptoms (questionnaire), (b) anorectal pressures at rest and in response to rectal distension, voluntary squeeze, and increases in intraabdominal pressure (multiport anorectal manometry with concurrent electromyography of the anal sphincters), (c) rectal sensation (rectal balloon distension) and, (d) anal sphincteric morphology (ultrasound). Results were compared with those obtained in nine female control subjects. RESULTS: Ten of the 15 patients had urgency of defecation and 4 also suffered fecal incontinence. Basal anorectal pressures measured just proximal to the anal canal (p = 0.05) and anorectal pressures generated in response to voluntary squeeze measured at the anal canal were less (p < 0.01) in the patients. The fall in anal pressures in response to rectal distension was greater in the patients (p < 0.05) and the desire to defecate occurred at lower rectal volumes (p < 0.05). The slope of the pressure/volume relationship in response to rectal distension was greater (p < 0.05) in the patients, suggestive of a reduction in rectal compliance. In 14 of the 15 patients at least one parameter of anorectal motor function was outside the control range. There was no difference in the thickness of the anal sphincters between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Abnormal anorectal function occurs frequently following pelvic irradiation for gynecological malignant diseases and is characterized by multiple dysfunctions including weakness of the external anal sphincter, stiffness of the rectal wall, and a consequent increase in rectal sensitivity.     

Defecographic assessment after colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis

Colonic J pouch anal anastomosis is widely employed after rectal resection. In the 36 patients who participated in our retrospective study, although postoperative continence was retained/maintained in each individual, a survey questionnaire indicated some difficulties in neoanorectal function. Therefore, defecography was performed in 20 of these patients. Patients experiencing soiling were found to have an increased ano-pouch angle and pelvic floor descent. Loss of sensation and incomplete evacuation were also associated with an abnormally large pelvic floor descent. However, stool frequency, urgency, and the need for medication showed no correlation with any of the defecography parameters. These findings thus suggested that the puborectal muscle and the levator ani muscle played an important role in postoperative function. Defecography was also found to provide a dynamic assessment of the postoperative state of colonanal reconstruction.     

Does uncomplicated diverticular disease produce symptoms?

A questionnaire dealing with bowel symptoms was administered to 97 outpatients referred for air-contrast barium enema. Subsequently, the barium enema was interpreted by a radiologist who did not know the results of the questionnaire. Forty-nine had normal x-rays, and 27 had uncomplicated diverticular disease. Weight loss, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, and pain at night were as common in those with a normal examination as in those with diverticula. Symptoms of colon dysfunction included abdominal pain relieved by defecation, altered stool frequency and consistency with pain onset, abdominal distension, feeling of incomplete evacuation after defecation, and mucus in the stool. These were equally prevalent in both groups. Therefore, no symptoms could be ascribed to the presence of diverticula.     

A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients

PURPOSE: Constipation is a common complaint; however, clinical presentation varies with each individual. The aim of this study was to assess a standard scoring system for evaluation of constipated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation who were referred for anorectal physiologic testing were assessed. A subjective constipation score was calculated based on a detailed questionnaire that included over 100 constipation-related symptoms. Based on the questionnaire, scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating normal and 30 indicating severe constipation. The constipation score was then compared with the objective findings of the physiology tests, which include colonic transit time (CTT), anal manometry (AM), cinedefecography (CD), and electromyography (EMG). Colonic inertia was defined as diffuse marker delay on CTT without evidence of paradoxical contraction on AM, CD, or EMG. Pelvic outlet obstruction was defined as paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectal prolapse or rectoanal intussusception, rectocele, or sigmoidocele. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (185 females and 47 males) of a mean age of 64.9 (range, 14-92) years were evaluated. All patients had a score of more than 15; on evaluation of the significance of different symptoms in the constipation score with the Pearson's linear correlation test, 8 of 18 factors were identified as significant (P < 0.05). These factors included frequency of bowel movements, painful evacuation, incomplete evacuation, abdominal pain, length of time per attempt, assistance for evacuation, unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 hours, and duration of constipation. All 232 patients had objective obstruction attributable to one or more of the following causes: paradoxical puborectalis contraction (81), significant rectocele or sigmoidocele (48), rectoanal intussusception (64), and rectal prolapse (9). CONCLUSION: The proposed constipation scoring system correlated well with objective physiologic findings in constipated patients to allow uniformity in assessment of the severity of constipation.     

Results of transperineal levator-plasty in treatment of symptomatic rectocele

A rectocele is a herniation of the anterior rectal wall through the rectovaginal septum into the vagina. The most important risk factors are a previous hysterectomy, obstetic injuries and the descending perineum syndrome. In some patients the rectocele becomes symptomatical because of defecation disorders. The patients have to give manual vaginal or perineal help during defecation. Radiological parameters like the size of the rectocele or retention of barium only have limited value for the clinical evaluation. In a high percentage we find simultaneous symptoms of fecal incontinence. Transperineal anterior levatorplasty makes it possible to close the rectocele. This procedure has a positive influence on defecation and continence. In a prospective study we performed anterior levatorplasty in 35 female patients having a rectocele in combination with rectal outlet obstruction. Subjective improvement of the defecation disorder was found in 74%. Only 1 patient complained of deterioration. No patient needed manual vaginal help postoperatively. Patients who needed perineal help preoperatively had worse results. Patients who did not need any manual help preoperatively nevertheless reported an improvement postoperatively. Fifteen of 20 patients, who suffered from fecal incontinence preoperatively, reported a better continence postoperatively (75%). Even in patients with incontinence the anterior levatorplasty is a good method for rectocele repair, as it improves rectal emptying and simultaneously provides therapy for fecal incontinence.     

Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals

AIMS: A study is made of the alterations in anorectal physiology among rectal prolapse patients, evaluating the differences between fecal continent and incontinent individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with complete rectal prolapse were divided into two groups: Group A (8 continent individuals) and Group B (10 incontinent women), while 22 healthy women were used as controls (Group C). Clinical exploration and perineal level measurements were performed, along with anorectal manometry, electrophysiology, and anorectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. RESULTS: The main antecedents of the continent subjects were excess straining efforts, while the incontinent women presented excess straining and complex deliveries. Pathological perineal descent was a frequent finding in both groups, with a hypotonic anal canal at rest (p < 0.001 vs controls) and at voluntary squeezing (p < 0.001 vs controls). In turn, the incontinent patients exhibited a significantly lower anal canal pressure at rest than the continent women (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and C in terms of pudendal motor latency, though latency was significantly longer in Group B than in the controls (p < 0.01). Moreover, pudendal neuropathy was more common, severe and often bilateral in Group B. There were no differences in rectal sensation to distention or in terms of the volumes required to relax the internal anal sphincter. In turn, both prolapse groups exhibited diminished anal canal and rectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal prolapse exhibit a hypotonic anal canal at rest, regardless of whether they are continent to feces or not. Continent patients have less pudendal neuropathy and therefore less pressure alterations at voluntary sphincter squeeze than incontinent individuals.     

Pathophysiology and treatment of anterior rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to investigate the clinical presentation and laboratory findings of anterior rectal mucosal prolapse (ARMP) and to assess the results of two therapeutic modalities. METHODS: Some 162 women with ARMP were assessed clinically and by defaecography and rectoanal manometry before and 1 year after one or two sessions of submucosal sclerotherapy or, in the case of recurrence, after transanal excision of the prolapsing mucosa. RESULTS: Almost all patients reported a combination of symptoms suggesting obstructive defaecation. At defaecography anterior rectocele and excessive perineal descent at straining were present in 78 and 72 per cent respectively. The size of coexisting anterior rectocele and the extent of perineal descent were significantly related to the duration of the disease (P< 0.001). One or, in the event of recurrence, two sessions of sclerotherapy led to an overall success rate of 51 per cent. Improvement after sclerotherapy was associated with partial recovery of anal tone and improvement of anal sampling and rectal sensation. Failure of sclerotherapy was related to rectocele of larger size (P< 0.001) and a longer perineal descent at straining (P< 0.001) than in patients with a successful outcome. Excision of the prolapsing mucosa resulted in symptomatic improvement in 42 of 47 patients and was associated with significant improvement of the defaecographic and manometric findings. CONCLUSION: ARMP is usually associated with anterior rectocele and excessive perineal descent. Submucosal sclerotherapy is successful in half of the cases, but only in the presence of a rather small anterior rectocele and short perineal descent. Failures after sclerotherapy can be treated by transanal excision of the prolapsing mucosa.     

Influence of age and prostate-specific antigen on the chance of curable prostate cancer among men with nonpalpable disease

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the Mayo Clinic experience of descending perineum syndrome from 1987-1997. METHODS: Clinical records were abstracted for demographic features, risk factors, results of anorectal and defecation tests, and a mailed questionnaire evaluated outcome and current symptoms. RESULTS: All results are mean +/- SD. Clinically, 39 patients (38 women, one man), mean age 53+/-14 yr, presented with constipation (97%), incomplete rectal evacuation (92%), excessive straining (97%), digital rectal evacuation (38%), and fecal incontinence (15%). Laboratory tests showed anal sphincter resting pressure was 54+/-26 mm Hg, and squeeze pressure was 96+/-35 mm Hg; expulsion from the rectum of a 50-ml balloon required > 200 g added weight in 27%; perineal descent was 4.4+/-1 cm (normal < 4 cm) by scintigraphy. Scintigraphic evacuation, rectoanal angle change during defecation, and perineal descent were abnormal in 23%, 57%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. Associated features included female gender (96%), multiparity with vaginal delivery (55%), hysterectomy or cystocele/rectocele repair (74%). On follow-up, 64% responded; 17 of these 25 responders underwent pelvic floor retraining. At 2-yr median follow-up (range, 1-6 yr), 12 still experienced constipation or excessive straining; their perineal descent was greater than in patients who responded to retraining (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Descending perineum syndrome is identifiable by clinical history and examination, and the most prevalent abnormality on testing is perineal descent > 4 cm; rectal balloon expulsion is an insensitive screening test for descending perineum syndrome. Pelvic floor retraining is a suboptimal treatment for this chronic disorder of rectal evacuation; the extent of perineal descent appears to be a useful predictor of response to retraining.     

Video laparoscopic surgery and rectal prolapse. Our experience in rectopexy

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is gaining an important role in the treatment of benign colorectal disorders. The aim of this study is the evaluation of clinical and functional results in 4 patients submitted to a laparoscopy rectopexy according to Wells. METHODS: Four females (22-76, mean 53.7 years) affected from a total rectal prolapse with fecal incontinence underwent this procedure from 1993 through 1995. Six months after surgery, at the end of a rehabilitation program consisting of kinesitherapy, bio-feedback and electrostimulations, all patients have been re-evaluated by means of a clinical exam, anorectal manometry, defecography. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results seem satisfactory and may allow to prefer this approach instead of the traditional open one.     

Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination

OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of obstructive defecation is unclear. We investigated whether impaired rectoanal coordination causes obstructive defecation and if this dysfunction can be corrected by biofeedback therapy. METHODS: We prospectively studied 25 healthy subjects and 35 consecutive patients with constipation (>1 year) with anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test. Symptoms were assessed from diary cards. Patients found to have obstructive defecation were offered biofeedback therapy. After treatment, their defecation dynamics and symptoms were reassessed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had obstructive defecation and 17 had normal defecation dynamics (nonobstructive). Five normals (20%) exhibited obstructive pattern but only one failed to expel balloon. In the obstructive group, during straining, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index were lower (p < 0.05), and anal residual pressure was higher (p < 0.01) when compared with the nonobstructive group or normals. After biofeedback therapy, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index increased (p < 0.02) and anal residual pressure decreased (p < 0.001); stool frequency, degree of straining, and bowel satisfaction scores improved (p < 0.05); 67% stopped laxatives and 11 patients discontinued stooling with digitation. CONCLUSION: Patients with obstructive defecation showed impaired rectal contraction, paradoxical anal contraction, or inadequate anal relaxation. These features suggest that rectoanal coordination was impaired. Biofeedback therapy rectified these pathophysiological disturbances and improved constipation.     

Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome

A prospective study was undertaken to assess the correlation between electromyography (EMG) and cinedefecography (CD) for the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPR). Clinical criteria for NRPR included straining, incomplete evacuation, tenesmus, and the need for enemas, suppositories, or digitation. EMG criteria included failure to achieve a significant decrease in electrical activity of the puborectalis (PR) during attempted evacuation. CD criteria included either paradoxical contraction or failure of relaxation of the PR along with incomplete evacuation. In addition, other etiologies for incomplete evacuation, such as rectoanal intussusception or nonemptying rectocele, were excluded by proctoscopy and defecography in all cases. One hundred twelve patients with constipation, 81 females and 31 males, with a mean age of 59 (range, 12-83) years were studied by routine office evaluation, CD, and EMG. Forty-two patients (37 percent) had evidence of NRPR on CD (rectal emptying: none, 24; incomplete, 18). Twenty-eight of these patients (67 percent) also had evidence of NRPR on EMG. EMG findings of NRPR were present in 12 of 70 patients (17 percent) with normal rectal emptying. Conversely, 14 of 72 patients (19 percent) with normal PR relaxation on EMG had an NRPR pattern on CD. The sensitivity and specificity for the EMG diagnosis of NRPR were 67 percent and 83 percent, and the positive and negative predictive values were 70 percent and 80 percent, respectively. Conversely, if EMG is considered as the ideal test for the diagnosis of NRPR, CD had a sensitivity of 70 percent, a specificity of 80 percent, and positive and negative predictive values of 66 percent and 82 percent, respectively. In summary, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of EMG and CD are suboptimal. Therefore, a combination of these two tests is suggested for the diagnosis of NRPR.     

Manometric evaluation of constipation--Part I

Tests of anorectal function have evolved into clinically useful investigations, and they should no longer be regarded as esoteric tools. This transformation has led to major advances in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of defecation disorders, such as constipation. Because constipation is a heterogeneous condition, it cannot be assessed by a single test. Judicious use of anorectal manometry, colon transit study, a test of simulated defecation, and defecography may provide invaluable pathophysiological information. Undoubtedly, examination of rectal and anal pressure activity, rectal sensation, rectoanal reflexes, and the functional morphology of the defecation unit provides more information than any other test of gastrointestinal motor function; however, there is no uniform criteria for defining manometric abnormalities. There is also an urgent need for establishing international standards for manometric techniques and for diagnosis. Nevertheless, knowledge and experience have paved the way for innovative diagnostic techniques and therapeutic approaches for patients with constipation.     

Constipation assessed on the basis of colorectal physiology

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a collective term for symptoms of different aetiologies and pathophysiologies. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of colorectal pathophysiology findings in a prospective series of patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 155 consecutive patients with chronic constipation underwent anorectal manometry, electromyography (EMG), the balloon expulsion test, colonic transit-time study, and defecography. RESULTS: All investigations were completed by 134 patients (112 females) with a median age 52 (range, 17-79) years. Patients were categorized on the basis of transit time and pelvic-floor function as belonging to 1 of 4 groups: slow-transit constipation (STC) (delayed transit time but normal pelvic-floor function, n = 28), pelvic-floor dysfunction (PFD) (pelvic-floor dysfunction and normal transit time, n = 32), combined slow transit and pelvic-floor dysfunction (STC + PFD) (n = 27), and normal-transit constipation (NTC) (normal transit time and normal pelvic-floor function, n = 47). There was no difference between diagnostic groups in anal sphincter pressures. However, rectal sensitivity to balloon distension was lower (P < 0.05) in patients with delayed transit. Paradoxical puborectalis contraction (PPC) was found on EMG in 42 patients (31%). The prevalence of PPC was higher (P < 0.001) in patients with pelvic-floor dysfunction. Inability to evacuate the rectal balloon was reported by 37% of patients with pelvic-floor dysfunction and 12% of patients with normal pelvic-floor function (P < 0.001). Rectocele was the only anatomic abnormality at defecography which was associated with poor rectal emptying. CONCLUSIONS: About two-thirds of our patients with constipation had objective evidence of delayed transit or pelvic-floor dysfunction. No single test could reliably identify any of the pathophysiologic subgroups of constipation.     

Value of abdominal rectopexy in obstructive disorders of defecation. A prospective study using a defecation index, manometry and radiology

A prospective clinical, manometric, electromyographic and radiological study was conducted to judge the degree of success achieved with anterior-posterior rectopexy in 18 female patients suffering from obstructed defecation and varying degrees of incontinence. Prior to being operated on, 6 of the patients showed symptoms of intussusception, 4 an internal prolapse of the anterior rectum wall, and 5 a rectocele at least 2 cm in size; all of them had significant perianal descent. The main aim of this study was more precise definition of the pre- and postoperative bowel evacuation using a defecation index. This study shows that obstructed defecation is significantly associated with a lasting feeling of needing to defecate after evacuation, a sensation of incomplete evacuation, perianal pain and necessity for manual support during defecation. The patients had a mean age of 62 (range, 38-78) years. All underwent anterior-posterior rectopexy (Ivalon or Vicryl) with posterior pelvic repair of the puborectalis muscle. In 2 patients rectopexy was combined with sigmoidectomy, in 11 cases, with left hemicolectomy, and in 2, with subtotal colectomy. The median follow-up was 40.8 months (range, 6-66 months). Postoperatively anorectal manometry showed a significant increase in the resting anal pressure and the maximum voluntary pressure (P = 0.05). Continence was improved in 10 patients (55%), 7 (39%) of whom regained normal continence. No significant change in pelvic descent or anorectal angle was observed. Only 8 patients reported a complete evacuation of the rectum postoperatively.     

Synergistic augmentative effect of interleukin-10 and CD27/CD70 interactions on B-cell immunoglobulin synthesis

BACKGROUND: Patients who complain of constipation can be divided into those who have lost the natural call to stool, but develop abdominal discomfort after several days without a bowel movement (no urge); and those who experience a constant sensation of incomplete evacuation (urge). AIMS: To determine whether the two groups differ in symptoms, colonic transit, and perceptual responses to controlled rectal distension. METHODS: Forty four patients with constipation were evaluated with a bowel symptom questionnaire, colonic transit (radiopaque markers), and rectal balloon distension. Stool (S) and discomfort (D) thresholds to slow ramp (40 ml/min) and rapid phasic distension (870 ml/min) were determined with an electronic distension device. Fifteen healthy controls were also studied. RESULTS: All patients had Rome positive irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); 17 were no urge and 27 urge. Mean D threshold to phasic rectal distensions was 28 (3) mm Hg in no urge, 27 (3) mm Hg in urge (NS), but higher in the control group (46 (2) mm Hg; p < 0.01). Sixty seven per cent of no urge and 69% of urge were hypersensitive for D. Slow ramp distension thresholds were higher in no urge (S: 26 (3); D: 45 (4) mm Hg) compared with urge (S: 16 (2); D: 31 (3) mm Hg; p < 0.01), or with controls (S: 15 (1); D: 30 (3); p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hyposensitivity to slow rectal distension is found in patients with IBS who complain of constipation and have lost the call to stool even though their sensitivity to phasic distension is increased.