Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques

Clinical evaluation of a computer assisted spine surgical system is presented. Eighty pedicle screws were inserted using computer assisted technology in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae for treatment of different types of disorders including fractures, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. Fifty-two patients with severe fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudoarthrosis of T10 to L5 were treated using a computer assisted technique on 1/2 the patients and performing the screw insertion manually for the other 1/2. At the same time, 28 pedicle screws were inserted in T12 to L4 vertebrae for scoliosis with the help of the computer assisted technique. Surgery was followed in all cases (66 vertebrae; 132 pedicle screws) by postoperative radiographs and computed tomographic examination, on which measurements of screw position relative to pedicle position could be done. For fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudarthrosis, comparison between the two groups showed that four screws in 52 (8%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with computer assisted technique whereas 22 screws in 52 (42%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with manual insertion. In patients with scoliosis, four screws in 28 (14%) vertebrae had incorrect placement. In all of the patients (132 pedicle screws) there were no neurologic complications. These results show that a computer assisted technique is much more accurate and safe than manual insertion.     

Computer assisted spine surgery

When inserting screws into a vertebral pedicle, the surgeon usually exposes the back part of the vertebra and uses his or her anatomic knowledge to align the drill in the proper direction. A slight error in direction may result in an important error in the position of the tip of the screw. This is done with no direct visibility of crucial structures (spinal cord, pleura, vessels). Statistical analysis of a series of surgical procedures has shown that 10% to 40% of the screws are not installed correctly. To reduce the risk of complication, a computer assisted method is proposed that enables the surgeon to place a screw at a position preoperatively defined in 3 dimensions using computed tomography images. This allows the surgeon to align a standard surgical drill with the optimal position and direction. The depth of the pilot hole during drilling also is monitored by the system to prevent penetration of the anterior cortex of the vertebral body. Using this procedure, in vitro tests were performed and showed that an accuracy of less than 1 mm can be obtained. Clinical trials were done in 10 patients who suffered severe scoliosis or spondylolisthesis. The trajectory of the holes drilled in L2, L3, L4, and L5 vertebrae were checked for all clinical tests. Postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans showed that the screws were well inserted in each plane for each pedicle. This technique also can be used to perform osteosynthesis at the thoracic and cervical levels.     

Bone registration method for robot assisted surgery: pedicle screw insertion

A registration method that identifies bone geometry with respect to a robotic manipulator arm is presented. Although the method is generally applicable to many orthopaedic internal fixation procedures, it was only demonstrated for the insertion of pedicle screws in vertebral bodies for spine fixation. The method relies upon obtaining an impression of the vertebral bodies. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of both vertebrae and mould are reconstructed using a computer aided engineering (CAE) system. From the reconstructions, the surgeon is able to do preoperative planning including selection of pedicle screw diameter, direction of screw through pedicle, point of entry and length of engagement. The three-dimensional models are than meshed to determine positions of the surgeon's preoperative plan relative to the mould. Intra-operative positions are defined in space by a mechanical fixture rigidly attached to the mould and designed to allow a manipulator end-effector to recognize the global coordinates of the in vivo spine. The theory and methodology were validated using a five-axis manipulator arm. This initial presentation assumes and allows no relative motion between vertebrae in vivo.     

Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro assessment of accuracy and reliability of frameless stereotaxis for insertion of pedicle screws in human cadaveric lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To assess a new method of targeting and placing pedicle screws in a human cadaver study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation is common. Complications may occur from improper placement of screws. Even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons, improper placement can occur in 5.2% of pedicles instrumented. Development of computer-guided methods of pedicle screw insertion may decrease this complication rate. METHODS: The technique used preoperative computed tomography scans together with a commercial neurosurgical navigational computer system to assist in placing guidewires in the pedicles. A section of human cadaver spine was first scanned and the data transferred to the workstation. The image data set and physical specimen were then registered by using an instrumented articulated arm to identify selected points on the specimen and randomly sample surface points. Eight highly repeatable locations on each vertebral body were found to be suitable for registration, but better overall accuracy was obtained when surface matching was used in combination with these points. Under guidance of image on the computer, Kirschner wires were inserted into the pedicles of four vertebral bodies. The spine was rescanned, and the planned and resulting positions of the wires compared. RESULTS: The average distance between the planned and resulting wire entry point was 1.2 mm, with an average difference in planned and resulting trajectories of 6.0 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided pedicle screw instrumentation is feasible. Further technical points require clarification before widespread use is possible.     

Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement

STUDY DESIGN: Pedicle screws were pulled out of human cadaveric vertebrae before and after augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate or in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement. The fixation strength of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with that of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a new in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement might be suitable for augmenting the fixation of pedicle screws. The principle objective was to compare the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement with the pull-out behavior of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation was chosen as the standard because of its current clinical use. Five types of screws were tested to determine whether screw design had an effect on the efficacy of augmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although many factors affect the pull-out resistance of pedicle screws, a key determinant of their performance is the strength of their attachment to the spine. In elderly, osteopenic patients, the screw-bone interface is especially at risk for stripping during insertion or pull-out after surgery. In these patients, polymethylmethacrylate has been used to augment pedicle screw fixation, although its use is not without risk. In situ-setting calcium phosphate cements may provide an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate in this application. Like polymethylmethacrylate, calcium phosphate cements can be injected into the prepared screw hole. They have the added advantage of being resorbed and replaced during healing and normal bone remodeling. METHODS: Thirty human lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) were implanted bilaterally with one of five types of pedicle screws (n = 6 for each screw type). The screws were pulled out 3.0 mm at 0.25 mm/sec with a servohydraulic materials testing machine. The 3.0-mm pull-out distance, which was slightly longer than one thread pitch, was designed to strip the screw-bone interface but to leave the pedicle otherwise intact. After the initial testing, the screws in each vertebrae were removed, and the screw tracks were filled with 2.0 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (one side) or calcium phosphate cement (contralateral side). After augmentation, the screws were reinserted, and the cements were allowed to harden for 24 hours. Postaugmentation testing followed the protocols for preaugmentation testing, and the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. RESULTS: Mechanically, calcium phosphate cement compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate for augmenting pedicle screws. Both restored the strength of the screw-bone interface: across all screw types, the average increase in pull-out strength was 147% with polymethylmethacrylate augmentation and 102% with calcium phosphate cement. There were no significant differences because of screw type with either type of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement investigated in this study compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate in a single-cycle, pull-out test of augmented pedicle screws in senile trabecular bone. With further evaluation, this cement may offer an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for the enhancement of pedicle screw fixation clinically.     

Identification of a new cis-regulatory element in a Nicotiana tabacum polyubiquitin gene promoter

With the development of powerful computer systems, computer-assisted medical diagnosis and therapy have become common over the last 10 years. Even in the surgical field, computer- and robotic-assisted techniques are becoming practical but are not yet used on a daily basis. In the orthopaedic field, computer and robotic assistance is used in planning and performing demanding three-dimensional osteotomies, setting pedicle screws in the spine and milling the femoral medullary canal in total hip replacement. This article introduces a computer- and robotic-assisted system for performing arthroplasty in total knee replacement procedures.     

Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional regional bone mineral density of the pedicle was measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Biomechanical tests were performed to clarify the role of the pedicle in screw stability. OBJECTIVES: To identify the structural characteristics of the pedicle that supports pedicle screw stability and the differences in these characteristics between normal and osteoporotic vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The pedicle screw is an essential component of many systems used to align the spine. The contribution of the pedicle to screw stability, however, has not been fully investigated. METHODS: Trabecular, subcortical, and cortical bone mineral density and the area of the pedicle were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone mineral density also was recalculated in four circumferential layers. These parameters were compared between normal and osteoporotic individuals. The relative contribution of the pedicle to screw stability was evaluated by caudocephalad and pull-out loading in a vertebra with or without its body. RESULTS: Inner trabecular, middle subcortical, and outer cortical bone mineral density and cortical bone area in the pedicle were significantly lower in osteoporotic vertebrae than those in normal vertebrae. In the pedicle, bone mineral density increased close to the outer layer. Bone mineral density not as thick even in the outer layer in osteoporotic subjects. Approximately 80% of the caudocephalad stiffness and 60% of the pullout strength of the pedicle screw depended on the pedicle rather than on the vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Screw stability depends on the structural characteristics of the pedicle. The pedicle was denser in the subcortical bone, in which the threads of the screw engage, than in trabecular bone. In osteoporosis, bone mineral density was not as dense even in the outer layer, and the cortex was thinner than normal. A larger screw would not enhance screw stability and may break the thin cortex in osteoporotic vertebrae.     

Percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using image guided techniques

A computer assisted technique of iliosacral screw placement that is applicable to unstable pelvic ring fractures is proposed. The goals are to operate noninvasively with a percutaneous procedure to decrease the complications of surgical exposure and to provide greater accuracy in locating the close neurovascular structures. Preoperative computed tomographic images of the pelvis are provided and a computed tomography three-dimensional model is built. In this model, the optimal trajectories for the drilling are planned. An ultrasound based registration is performed intraoperatively. This registration is the most original part of this work. After performing the passive drilling guidance step, the surgeon places the screws. The accuracy of the ultrasound based registration is checked by comparison with a standard surface based registration at the end of the test experiment. Each screw position is verified by a computed tomographic examination. Four human anatomic specimen pelves were tested with three screw insertions for each pelvis (12 screws). All of the screws were considered to be placed correctly. The method is safe and encourages the start of clinical application.     

Transcutaneous or transconjunctival peribulbar anesthesia?

The complications of 648 consecutively inserted Universal AO pedicle screws (140 in the thoracic spine and 508 in the lumbar spine) performed by one surgical team to treat 91 patients with spinal problems, were reviewed. The spinal pathology consisted of: scoliosis (34 patients), degenerative lower lumbar spinal disease (25 patients), neoplastic spinal disease (11 patients), thoracic kyphosis (8 patients), spinal fractures (7 patients), lumbo-sacral spondylolisthesis (3 patients), and osteomyelitis (3 patients). Intraoperative complications were: screw misplacement (n = 3), nerve root impingement (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 2) and pedicle fracture (n = 2). Postoperative complications were; deep wound infection (n = 4), screw loosening (n = 2) and rod-screw disconnection (n = 1). The conclusion was that pedicle screw fixation has an acceptable complication rate and neurological injury during this procedure is unlikely.     

Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 21 patients in which cervical pedicle screw fixation was used at C7 with or without upper thoracic pedicle screw fixation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of pedicle screw placement in the lower cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of posterior cervical spine fixation, including lateral mass fixation, has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, lateral mass fixation at C7 is often hindered by lack of substantial high quality bone. The end level of long cervical spine constructs is frequently C7 or T1. Dissatisfaction with lateral mass fixation at C7 and T1 led the authors to use lower cervical pedicle screw fixation for several cervical spine disorders. METHODS: Twenty-one patients who had undergone cervical pedicle screw fixation at C7 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 12 males and 9 females, with an average age of 52 years. All pedicle screws were placed, after direct palpation of the pedicle, with a right angle nerve hook after laminoforaminotomy at C7. RESULTS: There were no neurologic complications related to pedicle screw placement, and no patient was symptomatically worse after the operation. Six patients with root pathology improved. Of 14 patients with cervical myelopathy, 12 improved at least one Nurick grade, and 2 had no improvement. There were no failures of fixation or complications related to pedicle fixation at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws in C7 placed with laminoforaminotomy and palpation technique appears to be safe and efficacious. Excellent fixation can be achieved.     

Accuracy of using computed tomography to identify pedicle screw placement in cadaveric human lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Utility of using computed tomography to predict pedicle screw misplacement. OBJECTIVE: This study defines the sensitivity and specificity of predicting pedicle screw placement by experienced clinicians using a CT scan image. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical and research settings, the method most commonly used to evaluate pedicle screws placement has been computed tomography. However, no current literature describes the accuracy of this method of evaluating screw placement. METHOD: Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy pedicle screws of identical size were placed in six cadaveric human lumbar spine. Wide laminectomy was performed to allow complete visualization of the pedicles. Three consecutive lumbar levels were instrumented in each spine, giving 36 pedicle screw placements to identify. The instrumented spines were imaged, and four orthopaedic spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist were asked to read the images to identify the accuracy of screw placement within the pedicles. RESULTS: The sensitivity rate of identifying a misplaced screw was 67 +/- 6% for cobalt-chrome screws compared with 86 +/- 5% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). The specificity rates of radiographic diagnosis of misplaced pedicle screws were 66 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws and 88 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Similarly, a statistically significant difference was found in the sensitivity rates of identifying screws placed correctly in the pedicle: 70 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws versus 89 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Overall accuracy rates were 68 +/- 7% for cobalt chrome screws versus 87 +/- 3% for titanium screws (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Reliance on the computed tomography scan data alone in determining accuracy of pedicle screws can lead to inaccuracies in both clinical and research conditions.     

Impact of chronic cough on quality of life

STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical influence of in situ setting hydroxyapatite cement was examined for use in pedicle screw revision surgery. Pull-out testing of control and pedicle screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement was performed in human cadaver vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine the immediate effect of using hydroxyapatite cement to augment revision pedicle screws after failure of the primary pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The potential problems associated with using polymethylmethacrylate to augment revision pedicular instrumentation have prompted the search for other solutions. The introduction of resorbable hydroxyapatite pastes may have provided new biocompatible solutions for pedicle screw revision. METHODS: Ten human cadaver vertebrae were instrumented with 6.0-mm pedicle screws in each pedicle. The screws were loaded to failure in axial tension (pull-out). The failed pedicles then were instrumented with 7.0-mm pedicle screws, either augmented with hydroxyapatite cement or nonaugmented, which also were loaded to failure. Finally, the nonaugmented 7.0-mm screw hole was reinstrumented with a hydroxyapatite cement-augmented, 7.0-mm pedicle screw and loaded to failure. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm, hydroxyapatite cement-augmented screws was 325% (P = 2.9 x 10(-5)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws, whereas the strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws was only 73% (P = 2.0 x 10(-2)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws. The 7.0-mm screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement also were able to salvage 7.0-mm pull-out sites to 384% (P = 6.9E-5) of the pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyapatite cement may be a mechanically viable alternative to polymethyl methacrylate for augmenting revision pedicular instrumentation and should be considered for future experimental, animal, and clinical testing.     

In vitro simulation. Early results of stereotaxy for pedicle screw placement

STUDY DESIGN: Frameless stereotaxy with doppler ultrasound and three dimensional computer model registration is assessed in vitro for pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To identify feasibility of pedicle screw navigation and placement using this technology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Inaccurate pedicle screw placement can lead to neurovascular injury or suboptimal fixation. Present techniques in pedicle screw placement involve only confirmation of hole orientation. METHOD: Forty-four pedicle screws were placed in lumbosacral models and cadaver specimens. Accuracy was assessed with a computed tomography scan and vertebral cross sectioning. RESULTS: All screws were intrapedicular. Accuracy of anterior cortical fixation was 1.5 mm, with a range of 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: In vitro frameless stereotaxy is accurate for pedicle screw placement. This technology adds a component of navigation to pedicle screw placement.     

Nitric oxide as a regulatory factor in sleep-wakefulness mechanisms

Most screws used in fracture fixation necessitate a separate step for tapping of the screw hole. Titanium screw systems have been developed in which the screws can be inserted directly after a drill hole is made. These self-tapping screws thereby eliminate an operative step. A retrospective study was conducted that evaluated all wrist and hand procedures performed between January 1992 and December 1994 by 1 surgeon using screw fixation. The results of 39 cases treated with standard tapped titanium screws were compared with 28 cases treated with self-tapping titanium screws. Nearly identical union and complication rates were obtained in each group. Comparable results can be obtained with self-tapping screw fixation, which limits the number of instruments needed, eliminates an operative step, and thereby may diminish operative risk and shorten operative time.     

Anatomic considerations of anterior transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic parameters of C1 and C2 were measured in 30 dried human cervical spines. Anterior transarticular C1-C2 screws were placed in 15 cadaveric spines. OBJECTIVE: To provide anatomic data for anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or C1-C2 screw and plate fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A posterior approach to fixation in the atlantoaxial joint has been well described. Damage to the vertebral artery is documented as a rare complication of posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. An anterior surgical approach to exposing the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone graft recently has been developed. No anatomic information regarding the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 is available in the literature. METHODS: Direct measurements using digital calipers and a goniometer were taken from 30 pairs of dried human C1 and C2 vertebrae. The anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw insertion point is at the junction of the lateral edge of the C2 vertebral body to 4 mm above the inferior edge of the C2 anterior arch. The parameters related to anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation or screw and plate fixation between the C1 lateral mass and the C2 vertebral body were measured. Fifteen embalmed cadavers were used for anterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement. Longer screws (30-40 mm) were used to detect whether the screw tips violated the upper cervical canal or vertebral arteries. RESULTS: In the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw placement, lateral angulation of the screw placement relative to sagittal plane ranged from 4.8 +/- 1.8 degrees to 25.3 +/- 2.6 degrees. The posterior angulation of the screw placement relative to the coronal plane ranged from 12.8 +/- 3.1 degrees to 22.6 +/- 3.2 degrees. The length of the medial screw path ranged from 14.7 +/- 1.5 mm to 25.4 +/- 2.8 mm. In the anterior screw and plate fixation, the anteroposterior diameter of the inferior facet articular surface ranged from 16.2 +/- 1.6 mm to 17.1 +/- 1.8 mm. The anteroposterior diameter of the C2 vertebral body ranged from 9.3 +/- 1 mm to 16.2 +/- 1.8 mm. The anterior prevascular retropharyngeal approach appropriately exposed the atlantoaxial joint for anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw placement. No screws violated the vertebral artery and cervical canal. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw 15-25 mm long can be inserted with a lateral angulation of 5-25 degrees relative to the sagittal plane and a posterior angulation of 10-25 degrees relative to the coronal plane. Additionally, in C1-C2 anterior plate fixation screws 15 mm long could be anchored in the inferior facet of the C1, and screws 9-15 mm long could be anchored in the C2 vertebral body.     

Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone

STUDY DESIGN: Insertion torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws were compared in human cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of the conical design with the cylindrical design, and to determine whether insertional torque correlates with pull-out strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A tapered pedicle screw design may lessen the likelihood of implant failure. Its effect on thread purchase is not known. Previous studies of cylindrical designs on the relation between insertion torque and pull-out strength have been conducted in bovine and synthetic bone. METHODS: Seventy-eight pedicles were assigned randomly to one of the following pedicle screw: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN), Steffee VSP (Acromed, Cleveland, OH), Diapason (Dimso, Paris, France), AO Schanz (Synthes, Paoli, PA), or Synthes USS (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Pedicle screws were inserted with a torque screwdriver. Each screw was extracted axially from the pedicle at a rate of 1.0 mm/sec until failure using an MTS machine (Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN). Force data were recorded. RESULTS: The conical design had the highest insertion torque. There were no significant differences in pull-out between any of the screw types. Correlation between insertional torque and pull-out strength was statistically significant only with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital and Steffee VSP in L4 and AO Schanz in L5. CONCLUSIONS: A conical screw profile increases insertion torque, although insertional torque is not a reliable predictor of pull-out strength in cadaveric bone. Screw profile (with similar dimensions) has little effect on straight axial pull-out strengths in cadaveric bone.     

Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical testing with human cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies was used to determine the utility of an injectable carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement for improving the structural performance of pedicle screws subjected to axial pull-out or transverse cyclic loading. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether augmentation with a carbonated apatite cement can enhance pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The beneficial effects of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on pedicle screw pull-out strength have been demonstrated. Cancellous bone cement, however, may provide an attractive alternative in this application, as it is remodelable, biocompatible, and nonexothermic. METHODS: Forty-three cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented with pedicle screws. In 20 of these specimens, axial pull-out strength was compared between the control screws and those augmented with cancellous bone cement. In the remaining 23 specimens, the screws were loaded in the superior-inferior direction with a peak displacement of +/- 1 mm at a frequency of 3 Hz for 5000 cycles. Three parameters were calculated from the force-versus-time data: 1) the energy dissipated, 2) the peak force at the start of the test, and 3) the peak force at the end of 5000 cycles. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the augmented pedicles averaged 68% greater than that of the control side. In response to cyclic loading, all measures of bio-mechanical performance improved 30-63%. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that augmentation with this carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement can enhance immediate screw fixation.     

Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the effect of change in screw dimensions and hole augmentation in pedicle screw revisions, the insertional torque was determined, and results were compared with those in control specimens in an in vitro study using cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the best method of salvage for failed pedicle screws, by evaluating the insertional torque after placing a larger diameter or longer screw into a stripped hole. Use of a shim and use of larger and longer screws were also investigated. Finally, the effect on insertional torque of simply removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole was investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effects of using bigger or longer screws and shims to salvage failed pedicles have been studied. The interaction between how much larger, how much longer, and inserting with or without shims, has not been well studied. Optimizing reinsertional torque through the use of bigger screws risks exceeding the pedicle capacity. Using longer screws risks violation of the anterior vertebral body, thereby placing the great vessels and viscera at risk. By knowing the relative contribution of increase in length and diameter, the surgeon can optimize the risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: Eight cadaveric spines from T10 to S1 were harvested. The specimens underwent radiographic screening and bone densitometry. A modified Latin square randomization was designed to evaluate the screw diameters and lengths. Each pedicle was its own control. A 35- x 6.5-mm screw was used as a control. Test screws were placed after pedicle screw hole failure was achieved and documented by stripping. For the test screws, the diameters were increased by 1 mm and 2 mm, the lengths were increased by 5 mm and 10 mm. Shims were added randomly. The peak insertional torque was measured for each control screw and test screw placement. In addition, during each screw placement, the screw was removed and replaced to determine the effect. RESULTS: Insertional torque, after the pedicle screw is removed and replaced in the same hole, was decreased by 34% (P < 0.000005). Increasing the diameter of the salvage screw by 2 mm caused the insertional torque to be increased by 8.4% of the original. Increasing the length of the screw did not improve the salvage screw insertional torque. There was an interaction effect for the 1-mm increase in diameter and the increase in length. At this diameter, increasing the length had a significant effect (P = 0.009) on the salvage torque. Using a shim created no improvement in salvage insertional torque (P = 0.77). There was a poor linear correlation between torque and bone mineral density (r = 0.18) in these osteoporotic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole substantially decreases its mechanical fixation. For pedicle salvage, increasing the diameter causes the greatest restoration of strength. Shims had no effect in pedicle salvage in osteoporotic specimens.     

Cellular regulation of prostaglandin H synthase catalysis

PURPOSE: To determine the pullout strength of adaption screws in laryngeal cartilage and its relationship to drill hole and screw diameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screw pullout strength in human cadaver thyroid cartilage was measured using a load cell. Screw sizes of 1.3, 1.5, and 2.0 mm were tested using drill hole diameters of 0.76, 1.1, and 1.5 mm. RESULTS: Maximum pullout strength was achieved using a drill hole diameter of 0.76 mm and a 1.5 mm screw. Pullout strength for this combination was 27.5 N. CONCLUSION: Adaption screws can be used in thyroid cartilage but pullout strengths will be less than in bone. Drill holes for screws in thyroid cartilage should be smaller than those used for cortical bone. Maximum strength will be achieved using a 1.5 mm screw in a 0.76 mm drill hole.     

Implant/bone constructs in femoral neck osteotomy. An autopsy study

Previous studies have suggested that three rather than two screws may give better results in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. In the present study, the strength of various screw/bone constructs in femoral neck osteotomy was analyzed. Transverse osteotomies on 65 cadaver femora were fixed with two or three screws of two types: one with a shank diameter of 6 mm and thread diameter of 8 mm, and a prototype screw with equal shank and thread diameter of 7 mm. The femoral heads were subjected to static and cyclic loads in the one-legged stance position. Single-energy quantitative computed tomography measurements were correlated to load. The two experimental models resulted in different patterns of failure of the bone/implant constructs, otherwise the results were similar. Three of the prototype screws gave the strongest construct, while two of the other screw type were stronger than three. The explanations for the diverging properties of the different bone/implant constructs may be that large threads destroy too much of the bone trabeculae, and that screw threads larger than the shank may destroy the drill canal and produce an unstable situation compared with screws with equal shank and thread diameter.