Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute periapical abscesses

The activity, safety and tolerability of the azalide azithromycin were compared with those of co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute periapical abscesses in adults in an open, randomized, multicentre comparative study. Patients of either sex, recruited from 106 dental practices in Belgium, were aged between 18 and 75 years and had acute periapical abscesses not requiring drainage, confirmed by radiology. Azithromycin was administered as a 500-mg tablet orally once daily for 3 days (n = 150) and co-amoxiclav as a 625-mg capsule three times daily, for 5-10 days (n = 153). Both before and after treatment, masticatory pain, percussion pain, headache, and oedema and redness of soft tissue were graded on a four-point scale. Overall clinical success (cure plus improvement) was seen in 131/144 (91%) evaluable patients receiving azithromycin and in 142/148 (96%) receiving co-amoxiclav (difference not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence or severity of adverse events or in the number of discontinuations because of adverse events.     

A comparison of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of sinusitis in adults

The efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of non-severe acute maxillary/ethmoidal sinusitis were compared in a randomized, open clinical trial in 254 adult patients. The predominant pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae (83 patients). Azithromycin was administered orally to 165 patients at a single daily dose of 500 mg for 3 days, and co-amoxiclav (4:1) to 89 patients, at a dose of 500 mg three times daily for 10 days. The overall clinical response rates were 87.5% for azithromycin and 83.7% for co-amoxiclav at follow-up (day 21-28). Microbiological responses to both drugs were good, with only five patients in each group having a persistent infection after treatment. Both drugs were well tolerated and produced similar incidences of adverse events, which were mostly gastrointestinal. Azithromycin was as effective, and as well tolerated as co-amoxiclav, and its shorter simpler dosing regime may offer advantages in compliance and cost.     

Vascularized partial first metatarsal transfer for the treatment of phalangeal osteomyelitis

In this double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, 169 patients with symptoms of maxillary sinusitis but without radiographically confirmed empyema (pus) were randomly assigned to receive either 500 mg azithromycin once daily for 3 days (87 patients) or placebo daily for 3 days (82 patients). Nasal secretion, maxillary tenderness and pain, nasal obstruction, general malaise, and hyposmia were assessed at the start of the study and on days 4, 11, and 25 of treatment. After 11 days 58% of the patients in the azithromycin group were cured versus 31% in the placebo group; after 25 days the cure rate was 79% versus 67%, respectively. When both cure and improvement were considered, the corresponding figures after day 25 were 90% and 88%, respectively. Adverse events, predominantly gastrointestinal, occurred in 24 (27%) of the azithromycin-treated patients and in 15 (18%) of those treated with placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was a difference in efficacy in favor of azithromycin in the treatment of rhinitis with symptoms of maxillary sinusitis but without radiological signs of empyema (pus). Antibiotics should only be used to alleviate symptoms in patients with moderate to severe symptoms, as the results after 25 days for both improvement and cure are equal. In the treatment of acute rhinitis with symptoms and signs of maxillary sinusitis but without empyema, treatment with azithromycin seems to result in a better cure rate after 10-12 days when compared with placebo.     

Controlled study of brodimoprim and cephalexin in the treatment of patients with acute sinusitis in general practice

Brodimoprim, a new dehydrofolate reductase inhibitor, was compared with cephalexin in the treatment of patients with acute sinusitis. A total of 49 patients were randomly assigned to receive either brodimoprim 200-mg tablets once a day (400 mg on the first day as a loading dose) or cephalexin 500-mg tablets three times a day for 8 to 12 days. Nearly all patients treated were judged clinically cured/improved; in fact, only one failure (in the cephalexin group) was noted. In the 45 assessable patients, the time until disappearance of the symptoms and the duration of treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups. A bacteriologic examination was performed in all patients at baseline as well as at the end of therapy. Bacteriologic eradication was obtained in 88% of the patients treated with brodimoprim and in 76% of those receiving cephalexin. Both compounds were generally well tolerated (one patient in the brodimoprim group complained of skin reactions). These results suggest that once-daily treatment with brodimoprim represents safe and effective therapy for adults with acute bacterial sinusitis.     

Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefdinir and amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis. Cefdinir Sinusitis Study Group

Cefdinir is an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin that is active against pathogens commonly seen in acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis (ACABS), including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Two randomized, investigator-blind, multicenter trials (one in the United States and one in Europe) compared two dosage regimens of cefdinir (600 mg once a day for 10 days and 300 mg twice a day for 10 days) to amoxicillin-clavulanate (A-C) (500 mg three times a day for 10 days) for adult and adolescent patients with ACABS. Twelve hundred twenty-nine patients entered the U.S. study, 698 with antral puncture; 569 patients entered the European study, all with antral puncture. Clinical response (cure or improvement) was determined 7 to 14 days and 3 to 5 weeks posttherapy. Microbiologic eradication rates were determined 10 to 30 days posttherapy in a subset of patients who underwent pre- and posttherapy sinus aspirate culture. Rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were examined. Cefdinir, given once or twice daily, was as effective clinically (approximately 90% cure rate) as amoxicillin-clavulanate given three times daily in the treatment of ACABS. Microbiologic eradication rates were also similar in the three groups. The major side effect was mild diarrhea, occurring in approximately 20% of each group. Cefdinir caused fewer adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation.     

Multicentre comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of paediatric patients with otitis media

An open multicentre study was conducted in 484 children between the ages of 6 months and 12 years with otitis media to compare the efficacy, the safety and the tolerance of once-daily azithromycin given for three days versus thrice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (CA) given for ten days. A satisfactory response (cure plus improvement) was noted 10 to 14 days after the start of treatment in 199 of 215 (92.6%) azithromycin-treated children and in 186 of 198 (93.9%) amoxicillin/CA-treated children. The relationship between treatment and clinical response was independent of chronicity of infection and the presence or absence of a perforated eardrum. Improvement in signs and symptoms of otitis media occurred significantly more rapidly in the children treated with azithromycin. Treatment-related or possibly treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 11 of 243 (4.5%) azithromycin-treated patients and in 20 of 240 (8.3%) treated with amoxicillin/CA. No patients in the azithromycin treatment group were withdrawn from treatment, but six amoxicillin/CA patients, including two < 2 years of age, discontinued treatment prematurely because of adverse events; the difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0146). It is concluded that azithromycin given as an oral suspension once daily for three days is as safe and effective as amoxicillin/CA given thrice daily for ten days in the treatment of children with otitis media.     

Applicability of semi-automatic segmentation for volumetric analysis of brain lesions

Acute maxillary sinusitis is a common condition requiring broad-spectrum therapy to prevent development of chronic disease. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (n = 185) and clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily (n = 185), both administered for 10 days, in the treatment of patients with acute sinusitis. Efficacy was determined by assessment of clinical response at post-treatment and follow-up, and by radiological assessment at pre-treatment and follow-up. Assessment of days absent from work due to illness was also made. In the cefuroxime axetil group, 169/185 (91%) patients were cured/improved at post-treatment, as were 172/185 (93%) patients receiving clarithromycin and, of these, 137/169 (81%) and 143/172 (83%) maintained their response at follow-up. Follow-up radiography showed a reduction in incidence of air fluid level and/or opacification from 96% to 15% (cefuroxime axetil) and from 96% to 11% (clarithromycin), and a decrease in frequency of mucosal thickening from 58% to 28% (cefuroxime axetil) and from 56% to 29% (clarithromycin). Only 10% of patients in either group experienced adverse events and days absent from work were comparable. This study demonstrated clinical equivalence between twice-daily cefuroxime axetil and clarithromycin, both treatments being effective and well tolerated.     

Safety and efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in children

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of azithromycin with amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, including atypical pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. METHODS: Multicenter, parallel group, double blind trial in which patients 6 months to 16 years of age with community-acquired pneumonia were randomized 2:1 to receive either azithromycin for 5 days or conventional therapy for 10 days (amoxicillin/clavulanate if < or =5 years of age or erythromycin estolate if >5 years of age). Patients from 23 geographically diverse sites were evaluated for clinical outcomes and/or adverse events at Days 3 to 5, Days 15 to 19 and 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy. Microbiology (culture or polymerase chain reaction) was done at baseline and Days 15 to 19 for bacteria, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Serology for C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae was done at baseline and 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy. RESULTS: Of 456 patients enrolled during 17 consecutive months, 420 were evaluable. Clinical success at Study Days 15 to 19 was 94.6% in the azithromycin group and 96.2% in the comparative treatment group (P = 0.735) and at 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy 90.6 and 87.1%, respectively (P = 0.330). Evidence of infection was identified in 46% of 420 evaluable patients (1.9% bacteria, 29.5% M. pneumoniae and 15% C. pneumoniae). Microbiologic eradication was 81% for C. pneumoniae and 100% for M. pneumoniae in the azithromycin group vs. 100 and 57%, respectively, in the comparator group. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11.3% of the azithromycin group and 31% in the comparator group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Azithromycin used once daily for 5 days produced a satisfactory therapeutic outcome similar to those of amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin given three times a day for 10 days for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Azithromycin had significantly fewer side effects than comparator drugs.     

Cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute sinusitis in childhood

A study of the efficacy of cefuroxime axetil was conducted for the treatment of acute sinusitis in childhood. Thirty-nine patients aged 5-14 years were given cefuroxime axetil 20 mg/kg/day divided into two doses for seven days. The diagnosis of acute sinusitis was based on history, physical examination, and radiological findings. The results of throat cultures before treatment were 17 patients with group A beta-haemolytic streptococci, seven patients with pneumococci, and two patients with Staphylococcus aureus; in the remainder of the patients only normal throat flora were isolated. In 36 patients (92%) a satisfactory improvement was reported at the end of the treatment. It was found that cefuroxime axetil was efficaceous for the treatment of sinusitis in childhood.     

Pyrimethamine plus azithromycin for treatment of acute toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate azithromycin in combination with pyrimethamine for treatment of acute Toxoplasma encephalitis in patients with AIDS. Of the 14 patients given 75 mg pyrimethamine and 500 mg azithromycin daily for four weeks, eight were evaluable for clinical response. Five responded favorably, one had an intermediate response and two an unfavorable response. Of the nine patients evaluable for radiological response, six responded favorably, and three had an intermediate response. Eleven adverse events occurred in nine patients: rash (n = 5), abnormal liver function (n = 2), vomiting (n = 3) and hypoacousia (n = 1). This pilot study suggests that the combination of pyrimethamine and azithromycin may be further investigated and that the optimal dosage of azithromycin has yet to be determined.     

Initial and repeat screening for Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy

BACKGROUND: We examined the efficacy and safety of three different dosages of venlafaxine hydrochloride (75, 225, and 375 mg/day) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-group study. METHOD: Outpatients, 18 to 65 years old, who met DSM-III criteria for major depression were included (N = 358 randomized; 194 completed). Of the total patients completing the trial, 59%, 56%, 51%, and 51% were in the placebo, 75-mg, 225-mg, and 375-mg groups, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21) total, HAM-D21 depression item, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total, and Clinical Global Impressions scale. RESULTS: Each dosage of venlafaxine was associated with statistically significant improvement as compared with placebo, based on the intent-to-treat sample. The two higher dosages were associated with a modestly greater antidepressant response than was the 75-mg dosage. Nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and anorexia were the most common adverse events attributable to venlafaxine. Since headache occurred at a similar frequency in both the drug and placebo groups, we did not consider it to be attributable to venlafaxine use. Withdrawal from the study due to adverse events occurred in 5%, 17%, 24%, and 30% of the patients in the placebo, 75-mg, 225-mg, and 375-mg groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine, at dosages of 75-375 mg/day, is an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant. With increasing dosage, greater efficacy and possibly more adverse effects will occur.     

Comparison of ceftibuten once daily and amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In medical practice, antibiotics are generally given empirically for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). To be effective, antibiotic therapy should be broad in spectrum, and it should also cover the common beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. In this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study, 469 patients with AECB were randomized (in a ratio of 2:1) to receive 400-mg oral ceftibuten capsules once daily or 500-mg amoxicillin-clavulanate tablets three times daily for 5 to 15 days. Patients receiving ceftibuten were further divided into those who took the capsule with a meal (fed) and those who took the capsule 1 hour before a meal (fasted). Clinical and microbiologic responses were evaluated after treatment at 0 to 6 days (end of treatment) and 7 to 21 days (follow-up). Overall clinical success was determined by cure/improvement of signs and symptoms of AECB at the end of treatment and at follow-up. Overall microbiologic assessment was graded as eradication, persistence, relapse, reinfection, colonization, superinfection, or unassessable. Tolerability was evaluated by grading observed adverse events. The mean duration of treatment was 10.4 days for patients who received ceftibuten and 10.1 days for patients who received amoxicillin-clavulanate. A total of 252 patients receiving ceftibuten and 117 patients receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate were evaluable for clinical efficacy, and 55 patients were evaluable for microbiologic response. Both treatments improved the signs and symptoms of bronchitis, and overall clinical success rates were equivalent for patients treated with ceftibuten (211 of 252 [84%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (93 of 117 [79%]) (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5% to 13.6%). Overall microbiologic eradication rates were also similar for patients treated with ceftibuten (36 of 37 [97%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (12 of 14 [86%]) (95% CI, -5.2% to 21.2%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances, which occurred in 15% (47 of 316) and 24% (36 of 152) of patients treated with ceftibuten and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the ceftibutenfed and ceftibuten-fasted groups in overall clinical assessments of the clinical efficacy population and safety population. In conclusion, 400 mg oral ceftibuten once daily has a similar clinical success rate to 500 mg amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily, with a trend toward fewer gastrointestinal side effects, in the treatment of patients with AECB.     

Peroral famciclovir in the treatment of experimental ultraviolet radiation-induced herpes simplex labialis: A double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial

Three doses of famciclovir were tested for treatment of experimental ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced herpes labialis. Patients received 125, 250, or 500 mg of famciclovir or placebo 3 times a day for 5 days beginning 48 h after UVR exposure, a model of early episodic intervention. Of 248 patients irradiated, 102 developed lesions while on treatment. There were no significant differences between groups in the number of lesions. The mean maximal lesion size was reduced in a dose-proportional manner: 139, 105, 77, and 55 mm2 for the placebo and 125-, 250-, and 500-mg famciclovir groups, respectively (P=.040, linear regression). Median time to healing was faster in the 500-mg famciclovir group than in the placebo group, both by investigator (4 vs. 6 days, 33% reduction, P=.010) and patient assessment (3.0 vs. 5.8 days, 48% reduction, P=.008) analyses. These findings suggest that evaluation of higher drug doses for herpes labialis treatment is warranted.     

Double-blind, comparative study of rufloxacin once daily versus amoxicillin three times a day in treatment of outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of two dosage schedules of rufloxacin once daily were compared with those of amoxicillin three times a day in the treatment of 192 outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Rufloxacin was given as a single oral dose of 400 mg on day 1 and single daily doses of 200 mg on the subsequent 9 days (n = 64) or as 300 mg on day 1 and then 150 mg daily for 9 days (n = 63); amoxicillin was given as 500 mg orally three times a day for 10 days (n = 65). Clinical and bacteriological assessments were carried out before treatment, between study days 3 and 5, and at days 1 and 8 after treatment. Pretreatment cultures were positive for 139 patients, the most frequently isolated pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. Clinical success rates were comparable in the three groups (94, 95, and 98%, respectively), as were bacteriological success rates at the end of treatment (93, 95, and 91%, respectively) and at follow-up (88, 95, and 98%, respectively). The power to detect a significant 15% difference in cure rates was 74.9%. Follow-up bacteriological failures from pneumococcal infection were 18% in both rufloxacin groups combined and 5% in the amoxicillin group. The 200-mg dose regimen achieved average steady-state concentrations in plasma higher than did the 150-mg dose regimen (3.75 versus 2.72 micrograms/ml). Adverse events occurred in 11 and 13 patients, respectively, on rufloxacin and 8 on amoxicillin. This study shows that rufloxacin once daily ay be a possible option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 200-mg daily oral dose preceeded by a loading dose of 400 mg displays a better pharmacokinetic profile than the lower dose.     

A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections

One hundred and forty-five children with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections were entered into this multicentre, General Practice, investigator-blind study, designed to demonstrate equivalent efficacy between clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions. Seventy one children were randomised to treatment with clarithromycin suspension 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight twice daily and 74 to treatment with amoxycillin suspension 125 mg (bodyweight < 25 kg) or 250 mg (bodyweight > or = 25 kg) three times a day according to bodyweight. Duration of therapy was 5-10 days as determined by the investigator. Clinical evaluations were performed pretreatment, during treatment and post-treatment within 72 hours of cessation of therapy. Fifty two children in the clarithromycin group and 57 in the amoxycillin group were clinically evaluable. Both study medications were effective and there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to clinical cure rate (60% for clarithromycin and 63% for amoxycillin), clinical success rate (cure plus improvement, 96% for clarithromycin and 95% for amoxycillin) or rate of resolution of clinical signs and symptoms in clinically evaluable patients. The intention to treat analysis for all patients entered similarly showed no significant differences in efficacy. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to incidence or severity of adverse events which were generally mild and associated with the gastrointestinal system. Therapy was withdrawn because of adverse events in three children on clarithromycin and one on amoxycillin. Bacteriological cure rates could not be determined because of an insufficient number of evaluable pre-treatment sputum samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of once-daily doses of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg) and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 520 patients, was to compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole (40 and 20 mg once daily) with placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer. METHODS: Treatment with omeprazole or placebo lasted 4 wk; those whose ulcers remained unhealed continued the same treatment regimen for an additional 4 wk. The effects of therapy were determined by endoscopy and assessment of GI symptoms. Safety and tolerability were evaluated through reported adverse events, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: At weeks 4 and 8, the proportion of patients with healed ulcers was significantly greater in the omeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). At week 8, the healing rate was significantly greater in the 40-mg group than in the 20-mg group (82.7 vs 74.8%, p < 0.05). In patients with large ulcers (>1 cm), the 40-mg regimen was associated with a significantly higher healing rate (78.9%) than both the 20-mg regimen (61.4%) and placebo (34.6%) at week 8 (p < 0.05 vs omeprazole 20 mg; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Healing rates in patients with small ulcers were similar for the 40- and 20-mg groups. Omeprazole was well tolerated, with no significant differences versus placebo in the overall incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 40 and 20 mg, administered once daily, healed a significantly greater proportion of patients than did placebo. The 40-mg regimen offered significant advantages over the 20-mg regimen in patients with large ulcers.     

Effect of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate one hour after dosing in patients with stable angina pectoris. IMDUR Study Group

The effect of extended-release isosorbide mononitrate (ER-ISMN) on exercise tolerance 1 hour after dosing was compared with that of placebo in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of 151 patients with stable effort-induced angina. During a 9- to 24-day placebo run-in, patients underwent Bruce protocol baseline exercise tolerance tests, after which they received ER-ISMN or placebo for 5 days. ER-ISMN patients took 60 mg each morning for the first 4 days and 120 mg on the morning of the fifth day. One hour after dosing, ER-ISMN patients had a significantly greater increase in total exercise time (days 1 to 4: 5 +/- 53 seconds; day 5: 53 +/- 58 seconds) than the placebo-treated patients (days 1 to 4: 14 +/- 37 seconds; day 5: 21 +/- 48) (p <0.001). The times to development of angina and 1-mm ST-segment depression were significantly longer in the ER-ISMN group than in the placebo group. The difference between the groups in mean time to onset of angina was 34 seconds after the 60-mg dose (p = 0.004) and 49 seconds after the 120-mg dose (p <0.001). The mean time to development of a 1-mm ST-segment depression was 51 and 61 seconds longer after the 60-mg and 120-mg ER-ISMN doses, respectively, than after placebo (p <0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37% (28 of 75) and 7% (5 of 76) of patients in the ER-ISMN and placebo groups, respectively. As expected, headache was more frequent in the ER-ISMN group than in the placebo group (28% and 1%, respectively). The effects of ER-ISMN (60 mg and 120 mg) are clinically evident 1 hour after dosing, resulting in better exercise tolerance in patients with angina pectoris.     

Prevention of nausea and vomiting with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium given orally every 12 hours (amoxicillin, 875 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) with that given every 8 hours (amoxicillin, 500 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. DESIGN: Multicenter double-blind randomized double-dummy controlled trial. SETTING: Physicians' offices and ambulatory care clinics. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy patients at least 18 years of age with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis who could be treated with an oral antimicrobial agent were randomized, and data from 134 were suitable for evaluation. Four patients were withdrawn from this study because of adverse effects. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate orally every 12 hours (amoxicillin, 875 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) or every 8 hours (amoxicillin, 500 mg; clavulanate, 125 mg) for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical success at the end of therapy. RESULTS: Clinical success at the end of therapy was similar for the 2 treatment groups, 93% and 88% of patients in the every 12-hour and every 8-hour groups, respectively (P = .76; 95% confidence interval, -4.0% to 15.6%). Clinical success rates at follow-up 2 to 4 weeks after the end of therapy were also similar in the 2 groups. Adverse events related to treatment were reported with similar frequency in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin and clavulanate given every 12 hours is as effective and as safe as administration every 8 hours for the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.     

Treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin. The Sparfloxacin Multi Center UUTI Study Group

The efficacy and safety of a 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin were compared with those of a 3-day regimen of ofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Four hundred nineteen women were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, observer-blinded, multicenter study; 204 received sparfloxacin as a 400-mg loading dose on the first day and 200 mg once daily thereafter, and 215 received ofloxacin as 200 mg twice daily. A total of 383 patients met the criteria for clinical evaluability, and 174 were also bacteriologically evaluable; all treated patients were included in the safety analysis. Escherichia coli (86%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.6%) were the organisms most commonly isolated. Positive clinical responses were obtained 5 to 9 days after therapy in more than 92% of the patients in each group; sustained clinical cure rates 4 to 6 weeks after therapy were 78.3 and 76.9% in the sparfloxacin and ofloxacin groups, respectively. A positive bacteriologic response was observed in 98% of the bacteriologically evaluable patients in each treatment group at 5 to 9 days posttherapy and in 88.2 and 92.6% of the patients in the sparfloxacin and ofloxacin groups, respectively, 4 to 6 weeks after therapy. Almost 90% of all adverse events were of mild or moderate severity; the most frequent events at least possibly related to drug treatment were those common to the fluoroquinolones, namely, nausea, diarrhea, headache, insomnia, and photosensitivity. Photosensitivity was more frequent in the sparfloxacin group (6.9% versus 0.5% in the ofloxacin group); insomnia was more frequent in the ofloxacin group (3.7% versus 1.0% in the sparfloxacin group). These data suggest that a once-daily, 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin is effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.     

Naratriptan is effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine. Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. The Naratriptan S2WA3003 Study Group

The efficacy and tolerability of naratriptan tablets (2.5 mg, 1 mg, and 0.25 mg) compared with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, four-period crossover study. Five hundred eighty-six assessable patients received naratriptan 2.5 mg, 595 received 1 mg, 591 received 0.25 mg, 602 received placebo. Headache relief (moderate or severe pain reduced to mild or none) 4 hours postdose was reported in 68% of patients after treatment with naratriptan 2.5 mg compared with 57% after 1 mg, 39% after 0.25 mg, and 33% after placebo (p < 0.001 naratriptan 2.5 mg and 1 mg versus placebo and 1 mg and 2.5 mg versus 0.25 mg). Headache relief was maintained 8, 12, and 24 hours postdose with no use of rescue medication or a second dose of study medication by significantly (p < 0.001) greater percentages of patients after treatment with naratriptan 2.5 mg or 1 mg compared with naratriptan 0.25 mg or placebo. Naratriptan was also more effective than placebo in reducing clinical disability and the incidences of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. The overall incidence of adverse events and the incidences of specific adverse events did not differ in the naratriptan groups compared with placebo. No clinically relevant changes in ECG, blood pressure, or laboratory findings were reported. These data demonstrate that naratriptan is effective and well tolerated for the acute treatment of migraine. The 2.5-mg dose was associated with superior efficacy, whereas its adverse event profile was similar to that of placebo.